Prolonged Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy for recurrent extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective study.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) no longer are approved for second-line or later treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), and have not been studied in combination with chemotherapy. Exploring the efficacy and safety of second-line or later immunotherapy for ES-SCLC is an urgent clinical question that needs to be addressed, and combination therapies are an important research direction. This study intended to investigate the efficacy and safety of the sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy as a second-line and beyond treatment option for ES-SCLC. Medical records of patients who received treatment with sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone as a second-line or beyond therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The study evaluated efficacy and safety. Indicators of efficacy included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety indicators included adverse events (AEs). This cohort comprised of 46 patients: 24 in the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group and 22 in the chemotherapy group. Chemotherapy received by both groups was either albumin-bound paclitaxel or irinotecan. Compared with the chemotherapy group, the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group had higher ORR and DCR (ORR: 37.5% vs. 9.1%, P=0.04; DCR: 75.0% vs. 40.9%, P=0.04), and significantly prolonged PFS and OS [median PFS (mPFS): 5.07 vs. 2.45 months, P=0.006; median OS (mOS): 14.43 vs. 10.34 months, P=0.009]. Also, there was no significant increase in the incidence of AEs in the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group, which was well tolerated by patients. Sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy is superior to single-agent chemotherapeutic treatment as second-line or later therapy in ES-SCLC patients who have not received prior immunotherapy. These results need to be confirmed in future clinical trials.

Primary Malignant Melanoma of the Cervix with Rapidly Progressing Metastases

Introduction: Mucosal melanomas only account for 0.03% of newly diagnosed cancer cases. Female genital tract melanomas account for only 3% of all melanomas, with melanoma of the cervix accounting for less than 3% of all female genital tract melanomas. It is difficult to understand how mucosal melanomas arise as the pathogenesis is still unknown. The incidence of cutaneous melanoma has greatly increased over the years whereas the incidence of mucosal melanomas has stayed relatively steady. Given the rarity of melanoma of the cervix, a standard of care treatment has not been established. Based on the limited cases that have previously been treated, the first option is surgery for early stage melanomas with adjuvant radiation therapy indicated in some cases. The use of systemic chemotherapy is still controversial as it has not been shown to prevent metastases. Case Report: A 66-year-old postmenopausal female presented with heavy vaginal bleeding. A transvaginal ultrasound showed a complex cystic structure in the cervix and she was referred to gynecologic oncology. She was up to date on her pap smears, and they have always been normal. Patient was found to have a fungating 4 x 5 cm mass in the upper vagina and pathology demonstrated poorly differentiated malignant neoplasm. The patient was diagnosed with FIGO Stage IIA2 cervical cancer. Patient’s initial PET/CT demonstrated hypermetabolic area in the cervix consistent with known cervical carcinoma with no other uptake in the uterus. Weekly chemosensitization with cisplatin and external beam radiation was initiated. On clinical examination after treatment by the gynecologic oncologist, visible disease was seen confined to the cervix. An MRI of the pelvis showed response with the suspected tumor limited to the cervical stroma in the anterior and lateral portion of the cervix with no definitive parametrial tumor and no evidence of nodal metastasis. Second opinion from pathology review was received and results showed poorly differentiated malignant neoplasm immunohistochemically consistent with “melanoma”. After 25 fractions of daily radiotherapy with weekly cisplatin, patient underwent exploratory laparotomy for radical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic lymph node sampling. Final pathology of the uterus and cervix showed invasive poorly differentiated melanoma with deepest invasion of melanoma measuring 8mm and negative surgical margins. All lymph nodes removed during surgery were negative for malignancy. Adjuvant Pembrolizumab was started at this time. Two months postoperatively, the patient underwent CT surveillance again due to new onset chest wall and axillary nodules varying in size from 2-4 cm. Right chest wall axilla biopsy pathology was consistent with melanoma. At this time Pembrolizumab was discontinued and the patient was transitioned to Nivolumab and Ipilimumab 19 days after discontinuing Pembrolizumab. Four months postoperatively, additional CT scans were performed showing widespread metastatic disease in the lungs, chest wall, liver, peritoneum, retroperitoneum and left eye. Patient underwent left frontal craniotomy with tumor resection, and pathology was consistent with metastatic melanoma. Subsequent to craniotomy, the patient underwent three treatments with stereotactic radiosurgery. Despite treatment, six months postoperatively, the patient’s symptoms continued to progress with slurred speech, generalized weakness and abdominal pain. Ultimately, the patient passed away nine months after the diagnosis and four months after a combination of external beam radiotherapy, surgery, and vaginal brachytherapy. Discussion: Melanoma of the cervix is a rare type of cervical cancer with poor prognosis. Globally, 5-year survival is 18.8% for stage I, 11.1% for stage II, and 0% for stages III–IV. It has been shown that median overall survival time decreases with increasing FIGO stage. Risk factors have not been identified for gynecologic melanomas or most other mucosal melanomas. Pembrolizumab is most effective for cutaneous melanomas, however, has been shown to prolong progression free survival in mucosal melanomas. The median overall survival is significantly shorter for patients with mucosal melanoma (11.3 months) as compared to patients with a cutaneous primary (23.5 months). Primary malignant melanoma of the cervix (PMMC) remains a rare tumor and the prognosis is generally poor. Radical hysterectomy, chemoradiation, and immunotherapy have all been utilized in the treatment of PMMC. Further investigation of primary melanoma of the cervix is necessary to formulate a standard of care treatment.

Primary Malignant Melanoma of the Cervix with Rapidly Progressing Metastases

Introduction: Mucosal melanomas only account for 0.03% of newly diagnosed cancer cases. Female genital tract melanomas account for only 3% of all melanomas, with melanoma of the cervix accounting for less than 3% of all female genital tract melanomas. It is difficult to understand how mucosal melanomas arise as the pathogenesis is still unknown. The incidence of cutaneous melanoma has greatly increased over the years whereas the incidence of mucosal melanomas has stayed relatively steady. Given the rarity of melanoma of the cervix, a standard of care treatment has not been established. Based on the limited cases that have previously been treated, the first option is surgery for early stage melanomas with adjuvant radiation therapy indicated in some cases. The use of systemic chemotherapy is still controversial as it has not been shown to prevent metastases. Case Report: A 66-year-old postmenopausal female presented with heavy vaginal bleeding. A transvaginal ultrasound showed a complex cystic structure in the cervix and she was referred to gynecologic oncology. She was up to date on her pap smears, and they have always been normal. Patient was found to have a fungating 4 x 5 cm mass in the upper vagina and pathology demonstrated poorly differentiated malignant neoplasm. The patient was diagnosed with FIGO Stage IIA2 cervical cancer. Patient’s initial PET/CT demonstrated hypermetabolic area in the cervix consistent with known cervical carcinoma with no other uptake in the uterus. Weekly chemosensitization with cisplatin and external beam radiation was initiated. On clinical examination after treatment by the gynecologic oncologist, visible disease was seen confined to the cervix. An MRI of the pelvis showed response with the suspected tumor limited to the cervical stroma in the anterior and lateral portion of the cervix with no definitive parametrial tumor and no evidence of nodal metastasis. Second opinion from pathology review was received and results showed poorly differentiated malignant neoplasm immunohistochemically consistent with “melanoma”. After 25 fractions of daily radiotherapy with weekly cisplatin, patient underwent exploratory laparotomy for radical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic lymph node sampling. Final pathology of the uterus and cervix showed invasive poorly differentiated melanoma with deepest invasion of melanoma measuring 8mm and negative surgical margins. All lymph nodes removed during surgery were negative for malignancy. Adjuvant Pembrolizumab was started at this time. Two months postoperatively, the patient underwent CT surveillance again due to new onset chest wall and axillary nodules varying in size from 2-4 cm. Right chest wall axilla biopsy pathology was consistent with melanoma. At this time Pembrolizumab was discontinued and the patient was transitioned to Nivolumab and Ipilimumab 19 days after discontinuing Pembrolizumab. Four months postoperatively, additional CT scans were performed showing widespread metastatic disease in the lungs, chest wall, liver, peritoneum, retroperitoneum and left eye. Patient underwent left frontal craniotomy with tumor resection, and pathology was consistent with metastatic melanoma. Subsequent to craniotomy, the patient underwent three treatments with stereotactic radiosurgery. Despite treatment, six months postoperatively, the patient’s symptoms continued to progress with slurred speech, generalized weakness and abdominal pain. Ultimately, the patient passed away nine months after the diagnosis and four months after a combination of external beam radiotherapy, surgery, and vaginal brachytherapy. Discussion: Melanoma of the cervix is a rare type of cervical cancer with poor prognosis. Globally, 5-year survival is 18.8% for stage I, 11.1% for stage II, and 0% for stages III–IV. It has been shown that median overall survival time decreases with increasing FIGO stage. Risk factors have not been identified for gynecologic melanomas or most other mucosal melanomas. Pembrolizumab is most effective for cutaneous melanomas, however, has been shown to prolong progression free survival in mucosal melanomas. The median overall survival is significantly shorter for patients with mucosal melanoma (11.3 months) as compared to patients with a cutaneous primary (23.5 months). Primary malignant melanoma of the cervix (PMMC) remains a rare tumor and the prognosis is generally poor. Radical hysterectomy, chemoradiation, and immunotherapy have all been utilized in the treatment of PMMC. Further investigation of primary melanoma of the cervix is necessary to formulate a standard of care treatment.

Primary Malignant Melanoma of the Cervix with Rapidly Progressing Metastases

Introduction: Mucosal melanomas only account for 0.03% of newly diagnosed cancer cases. Female genital tract melanomas account for only 3% of all melanomas, with melanoma of the cervix accounting for less than 3% of all female genital tract melanomas. It is difficult to understand how mucosal melanomas arise as the pathogenesis is still unknown. The incidence of cutaneous melanoma has greatly increased over the years whereas the incidence of mucosal melanomas has stayed relatively steady. Given the rarity of melanoma of the cervix, a standard of care treatment has not been established. Based on the limited cases that have previously been treated, the first option is surgery for early stage melanomas with adjuvant radiation therapy indicated in some cases. The use of systemic chemotherapy is still controversial as it has not been shown to prevent metastases. Case Report: A 66-year-old postmenopausal female presented with heavy vaginal bleeding. A transvaginal ultrasound showed a complex cystic structure in the cervix and she was referred to gynecologic oncology. She was up to date on her pap smears, and they have always been normal. Patient was found to have a fungating 4 x 5 cm mass in the upper vagina and pathology demonstrated poorly differentiated malignant neoplasm. The patient was diagnosed with FIGO Stage IIA2 cervical cancer. Patient’s initial PET/CT demonstrated hypermetabolic area in the cervix consistent with known cervical carcinoma with no other uptake in the uterus. Weekly chemosensitization with cisplatin and external beam radiation was initiated. On clinical examination after treatment by the gynecologic oncologist, visible disease was seen confined to the cervix. An MRI of the pelvis showed response with the suspected tumor limited to the cervical stroma in the anterior and lateral portion of the cervix with no definitive parametrial tumor and no evidence of nodal metastasis. Second opinion from pathology review was received and results showed poorly differentiated malignant neoplasm immunohistochemically consistent with “melanoma”. After 25 fractions of daily radiotherapy with weekly cisplatin, patient underwent exploratory laparotomy for radical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic lymph node sampling. Final pathology of the uterus and cervix showed invasive poorly differentiated melanoma with deepest invasion of melanoma measuring 8mm and negative surgical margins. All lymph nodes removed during surgery were negative for malignancy. Adjuvant Pembrolizumab was started at this time. Two months postoperatively, the patient underwent CT surveillance again due to new onset chest wall and axillary nodules varying in size from 2-4 cm. Right chest wall axilla biopsy pathology was consistent with melanoma. At this time Pembrolizumab was discontinued and the patient was transitioned to Nivolumab and Ipilimumab 19 days after discontinuing Pembrolizumab. Four months postoperatively, additional CT scans were performed showing widespread metastatic disease in the lungs, chest wall, liver, peritoneum, retroperitoneum and left eye. Patient underwent left frontal craniotomy with tumor resection, and pathology was consistent with metastatic melanoma. Subsequent to craniotomy, the patient underwent three treatments with stereotactic radiosurgery. Despite treatment, six months postoperatively, the patient’s symptoms continued to progress with slurred speech, generalized weakness and abdominal pain. Ultimately, the patient passed away nine months after the diagnosis and four months after a combination of external beam radiotherapy, surgery, and vaginal brachytherapy. Discussion: Melanoma of the cervix is a rare type of cervical cancer with poor prognosis. Globally, 5-year survival is 18.8% for stage I, 11.1% for stage II, and 0% for stages III–IV. It has been shown that median overall survival time decreases with increasing FIGO stage. Risk factors have not been identified for gynecologic melanomas or most other mucosal melanomas. Pembrolizumab is most effective for cutaneous melanomas, however, has been shown to prolong progression free survival in mucosal melanomas. The median overall survival is significantly shorter for patients with mucosal melanoma (11.3 months) as compared to patients with a cutaneous primary (23.5 months). Primary malignant melanoma of the cervix (PMMC) remains a rare tumor and the prognosis is generally poor. Radical hysterectomy, chemoradiation, and immunotherapy have all been utilized in the treatment of PMMC. Further investigation of primary melanoma of the cervix is necessary to formulate a standard of care treatment.

Correlation between immune-related adverse events and efficacy of PD-(L)1 inhibitors in small cell lung cancer: a multi-center retrospective study.

Patients receiving PD-(L)1 inhibitors frequently encounter unusual side effects known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). However, the correlation of irAEs development with clinical response in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is unknown. This retrospective study enrolled 244 stage IV SCLC patients who receiving PD-(L)1 inhibitors from 3 cancer centers. The correlation of irAEs with objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. 140 in 244 (57%) patients experienced irAEs, with 122 (87.1%) experiencing one and 18 (12.9%) experiencing two or more. Compared to patient without irAEs, those developing irAEs had higher ORR (73.6% vs. 52.9%, P < 0.001) and DCR (97.9% vs. 79.8%, P < 0.001), as well as prolonged median PFS (8.8 vs. 4.5 months, P < 0.001) and OS (23.2 vs. 21.6 months, P < 0.05). Among the different spectra of irAEs, thyroid dysfunction, rash, and pneumonitis were the most powerful indicator for improved PFS. When analyzed as a time-dependent covariate, the occurrence of irAEs was associated with significant improvement in PFS rather than in OS. Furthermore, patients experiencing multisystem irAEs displayed a longer PFS and OS compared with single-system irAEs and the irAE-free ones. IrAEs grade and steroid use did not impact the predictive value of irAEs on PFS. The presence of irAEs predicts superior clinical benefit in SCLC. Patients who develop multi-system irAEs may have an improved survival than those developed single-system irAEs and no-irAEs. This association persists even when systemic corticosteroids were used for irAEs management.

Body mass index and adiposity influence responses to immune checkpoint inhibition in endometrial cancer.

Obesity is the foremost risk factor in the development of endometrial cancer (EC). However, the impact of obesity on the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in EC remains poorly understood. This retrospective study investigates the association between body mass index (BMI), body fat distribution, and clinical and molecular characteristics of EC patients treated with ICI. We analyzed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in EC patients treated with ICI, categorized by BMI, fat mass distribution, and molecular subtypes. Incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAE) after ICI was also assessed based on BMI status. 524 EC patients were included in the study. Overweight and obese patients exhibited a significantly prolonged PFS and OS compared to normal BMI patients after treatment with ICI. Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed the independent association of overweight and obesity with improved PFS and OS. Elevated visceral adipose tissue (VAT) was identified as a strong independent predictor for improved PFS to ICI. Associations between obesity and OS/PFS were particularly significant in the copy number-high/TP53abnormal (CN-H/TP53abn) EC molecular subtype. Finally, obese patients demonstrated a higher irAE rate compared to normal BMI individuals. Obesity is associated with improved outcomes to ICI in EC patients and a higher rate of irAEs. This association is more pronounced in the CN-H/TP53abn EC molecular subtype. NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA008748 (MSK). K08CA266740 and MSK Gerstner Physician Scholars Program (J.C.O). RUCCTS Grant #UL1 TR001866 (N.G-B and C.S.J). Cycle for survival and Breast Cancer Research Foundation grants (B.W).

Effect of age on safety and efficacy of novel cancer drugs investigated in early-phase clinical trials

BackgroundElderly patients are underrepresented in clinical trials, particularly in early-phase studies. Our study assessed the safety and efficacy of novel anti-cancer treatments investigated in early-phase clinical trials, comparing outcomes between younger and elderly patients. MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed data from patients enrolled in phase I/II trials at our center between January 2014 and April 2021. We evaluated clinicopathologic characteristics, toxicity, and clinical efficacy, categorizing patients into younger (≤ 65 years) and elderly (> 65 years) groups. Results419 patients were included with a median age of 56 years. Among these, 107 (26 %) were older than 65 years. Predominant cancers included breast (48 %), lung (10 %), and melanoma (5 %). Patients were treated in 64 trials, predominantly receiving immunotherapy-based (47 %) or targeted therapy-based (45 %) treatment. Elderly presented with poorer ECOG performance status (P = 0.001) and had fewer prior therapy lines (P = 0.01) than younger patients. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were similar across age groups (31 % younger vs 33 % elderly; P = 0.7), including in combination therapy scenarios. However, elderly patients experienced more AEs with antibody-drug conjugates compared to younger counterparts (56 % vs 14 %, P = 0.036) and were more likely to discontinue treatment due to toxicity (15 % vs 7 %; P = 0.011). No significant age-related differences in response rates and survival outcomes were observed across treatment modalities, except for immunotherapy-based regimens for which elderly patients exhibited higher response rates, disease control rates, and prolonged progression-free survival. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that elderly exhibit comparable safety and efficacy outcomes to younger patients in early-phase clinical trials for new cancer drugs. This underscores the importance of including elderly patients in phase I/II trials to ensure the generalizability of study results and mitigate age-related disparities in cancer treatment access.

Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant vs fulvestrant alone for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer following progression on a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy: Primary outcome of the phase 3 postMONARCH trial.

LBA1001 Background: The combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) + endocrine therapy (ET) is the standard first line treatment for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC). While disease progression occurs in nearly all patients (pts) with ABC, the optimal treatment for pts who experience progression on a CDK4/6i + ET remains uncertain. Real-world evidence suggests that use of abemaciclib after disease progression on a prior CDK4/6i prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) in ABC; however, Phase 2 trials with other CDK4/6i have generated mixed results. Here we present the primary outcome analysis for the Phase 3 postMONARCH trial (NCT05169567) of fulvestrant + abemaciclib or placebo in pts with HR+, HER2- ABC following disease progression on prior CDK4/6i + ET. Methods: postMONARCH was a global, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with pts randomized 1:1 to abemaciclib + fulvestrant or placebo + fulvestrant. Eligible pts had disease progression on a CDK4/6i + AI as initial therapy for ABC or relapse on/after a CDK4/6i + ET as adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer. No other prior treatment for ABC was permitted. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS; secondary endpoints included PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Assuming a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.7, the study had ~80% power to detect superiority for abemaciclib, with a cumulative 2-sided type I error of 0.05. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS curves and treatment effect was estimated using a stratified Cox proportional hazard model. Results: A total of 368 pts were randomized to abemaciclib + fulvestrant (n = 182) or placebo + fulvestrant (n= 186). Most pts (99%) enrolled directly after CDK4/6i + ET as initial therapy for ABC. Prior CDK4/6i was 59% palbociclib, 33% ribociclib, and 8% abemaciclib. At interim analysis, the study reached the pre-specified criteria for significantly improved investigator-assessed PFS with abemaciclib + fulvestrant compared to placebo + fulvestrant (169 events, HR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.48 – 0.91; p = 0.01). At primary analysis (258 events), the HR was 0.73 (95% CI 0.57 – 0.95), with PFS rates at 6 months of 50% vs 37% for the abemaciclib and placebo arms, respectively. Consistent effect was seen across major clinical and genomic subgroups, including pts with baseline ESR1 or PIK3CA mutations. ORR was improved with abemaciclib compared to placebo (17% vs 7%, respectively, in pts with measurable disease). PFS according to BICR was also improved with HR = 0.55 (95% CI 0.39 - 0.77). OS remains immature (20.9% event rate). Safety was consistent with the known profile of abemaciclib. Conclusions: Abemaciclib + fulvestrant demonstrated statistically significant PFS improvement in pts with ABC progression on prior CDK4/6i-containing therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT05169567 .

Superior outcomes and high-risk features with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone combination therapy for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: Results of the multicenter KMMWP2201 study.

Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) combination therapy improves the survival of patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Nonetheless, evidence on the use of KRd in Asian populations remains scarce. Accordingly, this study aimed at investigating this regimen's efficacy in a large group of patients. This retrospective study included patients with RRMM who were treated with KRd at 21 centers between February 2018 and October 2020. Overall, 364 patients were included (median age: 63 years). The overall response rate was 90% in responseevaluable patients, including 69% who achieved a very good partial response or deeper responses. With a median follow-up duration of 34.8 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 23.4 months and overall survival (OS) was 59.5 months. Among adverse factors affecting PFS, highrisk cytogenetics, extramedullary disease, and doubling of monoclonal protein within 2 to 3 months prior to start of KRd treatment significantly decreased PFS and overall survival (OS) in multivariate analyses. Patients who underwent post-KRd stem cell transplantation (i.e.delayed transplant) showed prolonged PFS and OS. Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were observed in 56% of the patients, and non-fatal or fatal AE's that resulted in discontinuation of KRd were reported in 7% and 2% of patients, respectively. Cardiovascular toxicity was comparable to that reported in the ASPIRE study. In summary, KRd was effective in a large real-world cohort of patients with RRMM with long-term follow-up. These findings may further inform treatment choices in the treatment of patients with RRMM.

Efficacy and Safety of Taletrectinib in Chinese Patients With ROS1+ Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase II TRUST-I Study.

Taletrectinib, a highly potent, CNS-active, ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has demonstrated high and durable response rates, high intracranial objective response rate (ORR), prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), and activity against G2032R with a favorable safety profile. We report outcomes from the pivotal TRUST-I study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04395677) of taletrectinib for ROS1+ non-small cell lung cancer in China. TRUST-I evaluated TKI-naїve and crizotinib-pretreated patients. The primary end point was confirmed ORR (cORR) by independent review committee; key secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), PFS, and safety. As of November 2023, 173 patients were enrolled (median age, 55 years; 58% female; 73% never smoked; TKI naїve: n = 106; crizotinib pretreated: n = 67). In TKI-naїve patients, cORR and intracranial cORR were 91% and 88%, respectively, and 52% and 73% in crizotinib-pretreated patients. In TKI-naїve patients, median DOR and median PFS were not reached (NR) with 22.1-month and 23.5-month follow-up, respectively. In crizotinib-pretreated patients, the median DOR was 10.6 months (95% CI, 6.3 months to NR; 8.4-month follow-up), and the median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 12.0 months; 9.7-month follow-up). Eight of 12 patients (67%) with G2032R mutations responded. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were increased AST (76%), diarrhea (70%), and increased ALT (68%), most of which were grade 1-2. Incidences of neurologic TEAEs were low (dizziness: 23%; dysgeusia: 10%) and mostly grade 1. Discontinuations (5%) and dose reductions (19%) due to TEAEs were low. Taletrectinib continues to show high and durable overall responses, prolonged PFS, robust activity against intracranial lesions and acquired resistance mutations including G2032R, and a favorable safety profile with a low incidence of neurologic TEAEs.

TACE combined with tislelizumab and lenvatinib in the treatment of advanced liver cancer: A real world study.

e16270 Background: The combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus Lenvatinib prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than Lenvatinib or TACE monotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study assessed the efficacy and safety of Lenvatinib plus monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD1) and TACE for patients with advanced HCC. Methods: Pts with advanced HCC who treated with Lenvatinib plus anti-PD1 and TACE were enrolled. Objective response rate (ORR), PFS, disease control rate (DCR) and OS were calculated to assess the antitumor response and the treatment-related adverse events to the safety. Consecutive pts were identified from September 2021 to August 2023.The Patients were included based on the following chief eligibility criteria. After signing the informed consent form, patients received sequential treatment with TACE in combination with Lenvatinib and tislelizumab. The anti-PD1 were recommended to be used continually every 3 weeks until disease progression, or intolerable toxicity. Lenvatinib was recommended to be used continually every day until disease progression, or intolerable toxicity. Follow up TACE should be given according to the patient's condition, no more than 3 times. Results: Between Sep. 2021 to Aug. 2023, 45 were enrolled. All pts received at least one dose of study treatment. The median age was 56 years(range34,73), 4 of the pts are BCLC-B stage, 41 of the pts are BCLC-C stage.Progression occurred in 8 of 45 patients and 14 patients died. The median PFS was 13.4 months (95% CI: 10.9-15.8 months) and the median OS was 20 months (95% CI: 9.8-30.4months). Of the 45 patients, a total of 3 (6.7%) patients achieved complete response (CR), and these 3 patients were treated with surgical resection. Partial Response (PR) was achieved in 12 patients (20%), Stable Disease (SD) in 22 pts (33.3%), Progressive Disease (PD) in 8 pts (17.8%), and Objective Response Rate (ORR) in patients. The Objective Response Rate (ORR) was 33.3% and the Disease Control Rate (DCR) was 82.2%.Treatment-related adverse events included increased AST 44.4%(20/45), increased ALT 51.1%(23), increased total bilirubin 42.2%(19/45), rash 44.4%(20/45), pruritus 42.2%(19/45), gastrointestinal reaction 33.3%(15/45), abdominal pain 24.4%(11/45), sensory abnormality 20%(9/45), and arthralgias 4.4%(2/45), etc., and Grade 3 Adverse events were increased ALT 2.2%(1/45), increased AST 4.4%(2/45), increased total bilirubin 2.2%(1/45), rash 2.2%(1/45), and gastrointestinal reaction 2.2%(1/45).No grade 4 or above adverse events occurred. Conclusions: In this study, TACE plus anti-PD1 and targeted therapies showed favorable efficacy and manageability in patients with advanced HCC. Toxicity was manageable with a low incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events. There were no unexpected safety signals.

Efficacy and safety assessment of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with molecular targeted agents or immunotherapy in unresectable hepatocellullar carcinoma: Real-world evaluation.

e16164 Background: Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) is established as a safe and effective treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent advancements in molecular targeted agents and immunotherapy have led to exploration of combining DEB-TACE with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or immunotherapy. However, real-world evaluations of DEB-TACE in combination with TKIs or immunotherapy are limited. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE alone, DEB-TACE with TKIs, and DEB-TACE with TKIs and immunotherapy. Methods: This study retrospectively enrolled 124 patients with unresectable HCC treated at Peking University Cancer Hospital from April 2018 to April 2023. Patients were divided into three groups: DEB-TACE alone (DTACE, 45 patients), DEB-TACE plus TKI (DTACE+TKI, 51 patients), and DEB-TACE plus TKI and immunotherapy (DTACE+TKI+IM, 28 patients). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare efficacy and safety between DTACE and DTACE+TKI. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), assessed by RECIST Version 1.1. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE version 5.0. Results: Among the patients, 99 were male and 25 were female, with 88.7% in BCLC-B or C stage. Before enrollment, 50.8% had received other treatments. In the DTACE+TKI+IM group, mPFS and mOS were higher compared to DTACE or DTACE+TKI alone (mPFS: 15.2 vs 9.2 for DTACE, 8.7 for DTACE+TKI; mOS: 32.3 vs 25.0 for DTACE, 20.9 for DTACE+TKI), though not statistically significant. ORR and DCR were 31.3% and 86.7% in DTACE, 35.3% and 84.3% in DTACE+TKI, and 39.3% and 96.4% in DTACE+TKI+IM, respectively. PSM analysis for DTACE and DTACE+TKI showed slightly better mPFS and mOS in DTACE+TKI (mPFS: 9.5 vs 9.2 months; mOS: 26.2 vs 19.4 months). No treatment-related deaths occurred, and serious adverse events (AEs) were comparable among the groups, with pain being the most common. AE. Notably, the frequency and severity of pain were closely related to the type of drug-eluting beads used, with the incidence of severe pain significantly lower in the HepaSphere DEB-TACE group compared to the CalliSphere or DCB group (0% versus 12.4% versus 19.7%, respectively; p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: DEB-TACE has been demonstrated as a safe, feasible, and efficacious treatment option for patients with unresectable HCC. There is a notable trend towards prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when DEB-TACE is combined with TKIs and immunotherapy. Moreover, HepaSphere DEB-TACE shows a lower incidence of severe pain compared to other types of drug-eluting beads, further highlighting its potential advantages in managing HCC.

State of the Art in Low-Grade Glioma Management: Insights From Isocitrate Dehydrogenase and Beyond.

Low-grade gliomas present a formidable challenge in neuro-oncology because of the challenges imposed by the blood-brain barrier, predilection for the young adult population, and propensity for recurrence. In the past two decades, the systematic examination of genomic alterations in adults and children with primary brain tumors has uncovered profound new insights into the pathogenesis of these tumors, resulting in more accurate tumor classification and prognostication. It also identified several common recurrent genomic alterations that now define specific brain tumor subtypes and have provided a new opportunity for molecularly targeted therapeutic intervention. Adult-type diffuse low-grade gliomas are frequently associated with mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2), resulting in production of 2-hydroxyglutarate, an oncometabolite important for tumorigenesis. Recent studies of IDH inhibitors have yielded promising results in patients at early stages of disease with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and delayed time to radiation and chemotherapy. Pediatric-type gliomas have high rates of alterations in BRAF, including BRAF V600E point mutations or BRAF-KIAA1549 rearrangements. BRAF inhibitors, often combined with MEK inhibitors, have resulted in radiographic response and improved PFS in these patients. This article reviews emerging approaches to the treatment of low-grade gliomas, including a discussion of targeted therapies and how they integrate with the current treatment modalities of surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation.

Efficacy and safety assessment of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with molecular targeted agents or immunotherapy in unresectable hepatocellullar carcinoma: Real-world evaluation.

e16164 Background: Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) is established as a safe and effective treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent advancements in molecular targeted agents and immunotherapy have led to exploration of combining DEB-TACE with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or immunotherapy. However, real-world evaluations of DEB-TACE in combination with TKIs or immunotherapy are limited. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE alone, DEB-TACE with TKIs, and DEB-TACE with TKIs and immunotherapy. Methods: This study retrospectively enrolled 124 patients with unresectable HCC treated at Peking University Cancer Hospital from April 2018 to April 2023. Patients were divided into three groups: DEB-TACE alone (DTACE, 45 patients), DEB-TACE plus TKI (DTACE+TKI, 51 patients), and DEB-TACE plus TKI and immunotherapy (DTACE+TKI+IM, 28 patients). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare efficacy and safety between DTACE and DTACE+TKI. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), assessed by RECIST Version 1.1. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE version 5.0. Results: Among the patients, 99 were male and 25 were female, with 88.7% in BCLC-B or C stage. Before enrollment, 50.8% had received other treatments. In the DTACE+TKI+IM group, mPFS and mOS were higher compared to DTACE or DTACE+TKI alone (mPFS: 15.2 vs 9.2 for DTACE, 8.7 for DTACE+TKI; mOS: 32.3 vs 25.0 for DTACE, 20.9 for DTACE+TKI), though not statistically significant. ORR and DCR were 31.3% and 86.7% in DTACE, 35.3% and 84.3% in DTACE+TKI, and 39.3% and 96.4% in DTACE+TKI+IM, respectively. PSM analysis for DTACE and DTACE+TKI showed slightly better mPFS and mOS in DTACE+TKI (mPFS: 9.5 vs 9.2 months; mOS: 26.2 vs 19.4 months). No treatment-related deaths occurred, and serious adverse events (AEs) were comparable among the groups, with pain being the most common. AE. Notably, the frequency and severity of pain were closely related to the type of drug-eluting beads used, with the incidence of severe pain significantly lower in the HepaSphere DEB-TACE group compared to the CalliSphere or DCB group (0% versus 12.4% versus 19.7%, respectively; p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: DEB-TACE has been demonstrated as a safe, feasible, and efficacious treatment option for patients with unresectable HCC. There is a notable trend towards prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when DEB-TACE is combined with TKIs and immunotherapy. Moreover, HepaSphere DEB-TACE shows a lower incidence of severe pain compared to other types of drug-eluting beads, further highlighting its potential advantages in managing HCC.

Efficacy and safety of eribulin-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer: A single-centre retrospective study.

e13121 Background: Eribulin, a nontaxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor, which was approved for the third-line treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) in China in 2019. This retrospective study aimed to assess efficacy and safety of Eribulin-based chemotherapy in ABC patients, especially for patients exhibiting HER2-0 and HER2-low status (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 1+ or IHC 2+with a negative in situ hybridization assay). Methods: This single-center retrospective study planned to include 126 ABC patients from January 2020 to December 2023. Enrolled participants received Eribulin either as monotherapy or in combination with other regiments such as anti-angiogenic therapy, PD-1 inhibitor, or alternative chemotherapy in clinical practice. The primary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety assessments. Results: A total of 84 patients with ABC received Eribulin were enrolled. Patients' baselines were summarized as follows: The median age was 53.3 years (range 30.0–86.0 years). 53 (63.1%) patients were HER2-low while 40 (47.6%) patients were hormone receptor (HR) positive. 63.1% patients have received at least one line chemotherapy before the use of Eribulin. According to the K-M survival analysis, the median PFS was 6.0 (range 3.2-11.3) months for all patients. The median PFS was longer for patients received aromatase inhibitors (AI) for over 6 months than patients with AI naive (median 10.1 vs 6.6 months; p=0.192) in HR positive patients. Patients who received CDK4/6 therapy had longer PFS than patients (median 10.7 vs 6.6 months; p=0.38). There was a trend toward prolonged PFS in the HER2-0 group compared with HER2-low group (median 10.13 vs 6.03 months; p=0.154), although there was no significant difference. A nonsignificant improvement of PFS was observed in HR-/HER2-0 patients, compare with HR-/HER2-low patients (median 16.4 vs 4.7mo; p=0.21). Meanwhile the median PFS of HER2-0 and HER2-Low was similar in HR positive patients. The objective response rate was 35.5% in HER2-0 group and 30.2% in HER2-low group. In multivariate cox regression, Eribulin as first line treatment (HR, 4.028; 95% CI, 1.131-14.337) and HER2-0 (HR, 2.903; 95% CI, 1.257-6.702) showed prognostic values regarding PFS. Common grade 3 or 4 adverse events that were reported in more than 10% were neutropenia (41.6%) and leukopenia (26.2%). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: This single-center study demonstrated encouraging efficacy and safety in the ABC patients treated with Eribulin. Significant PFS benefit was associated with Eribulin treatment in patients with HER2-0 compared with HER2-low. This study still needs longer follow-up to evaluate its efficacy more comprehensively.

Immune phenotype profiling based on anatomic origin of melanoma and impact on clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

9569 Background: The inflamed immune phenotype is associated with a favorable response to immunotherapy in metastatic malignant melanoma. Although variations in molecular features across melanoma subtypes and differing ethnic distributions have been well reported, studies investigating immune phenotypes across multiple institutions within the context of different melanoma subtypes are scarce. We examined the association of immune phenotypes with outcomes after immunotherapy, based on subtypes of malignant melanoma. Methods: Two institutional advanced melanoma cohortsrepresenting Asian and Western populations (YUHS, n = 123; Stanford University, n = 102) were included. H&amp;E-stained tumor slides were assessed using Lunit SCOPE IO, an AI-powered whole slide image analyzer, to define the inflamed score (IS, % of inflamed area) and the inflamed phenotype (&gt;33.3% IS). Clinical outcomes after immune checkpoint inhibitor (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) treatment, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall-survival (OS), were assessed. Results: In the overall cohort (n = 225), the inflamed phenotype was associated with prolonged PFS (HR = 0.634, 95% CI: 0.453 – 0.887, p = 0.007) and OS (HR = 0.655, 95% CI: 0.432 – 0.992, p = 0.044). On analysis of melanoma subtypes, we identified non-acral cutaneous melanomas (CM, n = 94), acral melanomas (AM, n = 52), mucosal melanomas (n = 43), uveal melanomas (n = 16), and melanomas of unknown primary site (n = 20), with a disproportionate enrichment of AM (37.4%) and mucosal (29.3%) melanoma cases in the YUHS cohort and CM cases (68.6%) in the Stanford cohort. The IS varied across different melanoma subtypes, with the highest IS observed in CM (median, [IQR]; 34.0, [5.8–52.2]), and significantly lower scores in AM (22.3, [7.7–36.9]), mucosal (13.6, [0–31.4]), and uveal melanoma (5.5, [0–13.6]). Among CM patients, the inflamed phenotype was significantly associated with better post-immunotherapy PFS (HR = 0.476, 95% CI: 0.274 – 0.826, p = 0.007). In contrast, the inflamed phenotype did not correlate with survival in AM patients (p = 0.58), who exhibited universally poorer PFS compared to non-AM patients (HR = 2.124, 95% CI: 1.486 - 3.005). Conclusions: AI-powered immune phenotype assessment highlights a heterogeneity of immune phenotypes across specific melanoma subtypes, as well as differential association with outcomes after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. While CM patients were well-stratified by immune phenotype, the predictive value of immune phenotyping was less pronounced in acral melanomas, which demonstrated poorer outcomes following immunotherapy.

Updated results on multiple antigens stimulating cellular therapy (MASCT-I) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A randomized, open-label, phase I trial.

2545 Background: The appropriate treatment for mUC remains unmet medical needs. MASCT-I, an adoptive transfer of dendritic cells (DCs) presenting 15 types of tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), showed valuable treatment in solid tumors. We previously reported the efficacy and safety of MASCT-I alone, or plus camrelizumab or chemotherapy in mUC (NCT03034304). The biomarker analysis and long-term follow-up to for this promising approach was unknown. Methods: All enrolled patients were divided into in five groups (G) as previous reported. Patients in G2 receiving maintenance therapy of MASCT-I after first-line platinum based-chemotherapy were allowed to enter enrolled in G3 and receiving MASCT-I plus camrelizumab when disease progressed. We updated the exploratory endpoint of the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay, which was used to measure activation of the cytotoxic T Lymphocyte (CTL) response in eligible patients. Long-term follow-up results for safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were reported. Results: 39 patients were enrolled. By January 31st, 2024, median follow-up time was 31.1 months. No new safety signals were updated. As previously reported, the most common adverse events (AEs) associated with MASCT-I included grade 1 and 2 flushing, pruritus, rash, muscle cramp, fever, and arthralgia. No MASCT-I-related death occurred. Median PFS and OS for all patients were 2.3 months, and 16.9 months, respectively. Patients in G2 presented superior OS of 41.2 months and duration of response (DOR) of 6.4 months. Nine patients treated with MASCT-I and camrelizumab after progression on MASCT-I in G2 presented a 24-month PFS rate of 55.6% and a 48-month DOR rate of 71.8%. Five patients had prolonged PFS for more than 20 months while two of them had PFS of more than 43 months. To identify the potentially beneficial population, IFN-γ ELISPOT data analysis revealed that patients who had positive TAAs ELISPOT response had significant prolonged PFS and OS compared to the non-responders (median PFS: 10.1 months vs 4.8 months, HR=0.30, 95% CI: 0.14-0.61, P&lt;0.005; median OS: not reached vs 13.6 months, HR=0.16, 95% CI: 0.05-0.57, P&lt;0.005). The Cmax value of INF-γ-positive T cells after cell infusion was also higher in patients with better PFS. In addition, we observed a significant increase in INF-γ-positive T cell activities in patients who progressed from G2 and were subsequently treated with a combination of MASCT-I and camrelizumab (Cmax mean (SD): 72 spots per million bulk PBMCs at G2 to 186 spots per million bulk PBMCs after transfer to G3, P=0.002). Conclusions: MASCT-I alone or in combination with immunotherapy or chemotherapy are safe and well tolerated, with inspiring survival benefit. The combination of PD-1 inhibitors may enhance the antitumor activity of MASCT-I. IFN-γ ELISPOT might be able to predict potentially beneficial populations. Clinical trial information: NCT03034304 .

Percutaneous cryoablation of breast cancer metastases: Analysis of long-term single center experience, efficacy and outcomes.

e13105 Background: Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation is a minimally invasive loco-regional treatment modality with wide availability and advantages of minimal sedation, short recovery, and ability to continue concurrent systemic therapy. However, there is a paucity of data about its long-term effects in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer despite evidence suggesting a potential survival advantage with loco-regional therapy for oligo-metastatic disease. Methods: We conducted retrospective analysis of patients who underwent CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation for metastatic breast cancer and had at least 1 follow up post cryoablation. Patient data including demographics, cancer treatment history and outcomes were extracted by chart review after IRB approval. Descriptive analyses of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to next-line treatment (TTNL) was performed. Results: The study encompassed 37 metastatic breast cancer patients who underwent cryotherapy between 2004-2021. These ablation procedures targeted various metastatic sites, which included the liver, lung, renal, lymph nodes, subcutaneous nodules, and bone. Their median age at the time of cryoablation was 58 years (range: 34-90). Among them, 46% had triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), 41% were HR+/HER2-, and 8% were HER2+. Prior to first cryoablation procedure, 59% of patients had received more than one line of systemic therapy, and 73% were actively undergoing systemic treatment. The median size of the metastatic lesions treated with cryoablation was 1.8 cm (range: 0.4-6.5 cm). The most frequent site for cryotherapy was the liver (38%), followed by lymph nodes (30%). For the entire cohort, median PFS, TTNL, and OS were 7.1, 14, and 65.7 months, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed mPFS of 3.1, 7.4 and 14.2 months for TNBC, Her2+ and HR+/Her2- cohorts respectively. Subgroup analysis for OS was not reported due to the small number of events and premature follow up time. Among the 27 patients who experienced disease progression, the majority (74%) had distant progression, with 22% occurring within the same organ but outside the ablation zone. Local recurrence within the ablation zone was rare, observed in only 4% of cases. Conclusions: Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of metastatic breast cancer lesions demonstrated durable local response, prolonged PFS, TTNL and OS. Future studies investigating cryoablation as part of a multidisciplinary treatment approach for patients with metastatic breast cancer are worthwhile to confirm disease control rate and improvement in survival.

Elacestrant in combination with abemaciclib in patients (pts) with brain metastasis from estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer: Preliminary data from ELECTRA, an open-label, multicenter, phase 1b/2 study.

1064 Background: Endocrine therapy plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor (ET+CDK4/6i) is the mainstay in first-line ER+, HER2- mBC; however, tumors develop resistance to ET. In EMERALD, single-agent elacestrant was associated with significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and a manageable safety profile vs standard-of-care (SOC) ET in pts with ER+, HER2-, estrogen receptor 1 mutated ( ESR1-mut) mBC previously treated with ET+CDK4/6i, resulting in the first oral SERD approved. Pts in the elacestrant arm had a 45% reduction in the risk of progression or death vs SOC ET (HR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77; p = 0.0005) (1). In those pts with ≥12 months’ prior ET+CDK4/6i, median PFS with elacestrant was 8.6 mo vs 1.9 mo with SOC ET (SABCS 2022). To address additional resistance mechanisms and enable an oral-oral combination, ELECTRA (NCT05386108) phase 1b is evaluating the safety of elacestrant + abemaciclib in pts regardless of metastases site and ESR1 status. Phase 2 will evaluate efficacy and safety of the combination in pts with brain metastases since both compounds cross the blood-brain barrier (2,3). Methods: Eligible pts have ER+, HER2- mBC. For phase 1b, brain metastases are not required for eligibility. For phase 2, presence of ≥1 active and measurable brain metastases per RECIST v1.1 is required. In the mBC setting, pts must have previously received ≥1 ET, ≤2 chemotherapy regimens, and 0-2 prior CDK4/6i (excluding abemaciclib). The phase 1b primary objective is to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of elacestrant + abemaciclib. For this analysis, RP2D, updated adverse events (AEs) and preliminary efficacy for the combination from the phase 1b portion will be presented. Results: As of January 2024, 26 pts were enrolled in the phase 1b elacestrant + abemaciclib cohorts, none with brain metastases. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. RP2D of elacestrant with abemaciclib will be reported. The most common all-grade (Gr) AEs were diarrhea (n=21, 81%; 0 Gr3), nausea (n=16, 62%; 0 Gr3), and decreased neutrophils/neutropenia (n=13, 50%; n=10, 38% Gr 3). No Gr4 AEs or Gr3 diarrhea were observed. In 21 evaluable pts, 6 had partial response (1 unconfirmed) and 9 had stable disease (2 unconfirmed) as best tumor response. To date, up to 11 cycles of the combination have been administered. Updated safety, PK, and preliminary efficacy will be reported. Conclusions: The RP2D for elacestrant + abemaciclib will be reported; the combinationdemonstrated a manageable and predictable safety profile. Preliminary efficacy data showed encouraging antitumor activity. Elacestrant has the potential to become the ET backbone for combination regimens. 1. Bidard, 2022. 2.Conlan, 2020. 3.Tolaney, 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT05386108 .

Length of treatment after partial or complete remission in immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma: An EUMelaReg real world study.

9531 Background: A significant proportion of patients (pts) with non-resectable melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) achieve durable remissions, but there is limited data on the optimal duration of ICI therapy in these pts. Therefore, the influence of the duration and maintenance of ICI therapy in pts with a partial (PR) or complete remission (CR) on further outcome was investigated. Methods: Primary objectives was the survival outcome after achieving PR or CR in non-resectable stage III/IV melanoma in relation to baseline prognostic variables and duration of maintenance treatment with ICIs in 1st line. This retrospective study evaluated melanoma cases from the EUMelaReg treatment registry, who achieved a best overall response (BOR) of PR or CR with either single agent anti-PD1 or combined anti-PD1/anti-CTLA4 in 1st line. Cases were stratified according to treatment duration after achieving a PR or CR: &lt; 6 months (M), 6-12 M, &gt; 12 M. To address immortal time bias, cases with early progression were cloned into all respectively compatible strata. These synthetical strata were further analyzed and compared by propensity score weighting, and robust confidence intervals were retrieved by bootstrapping techniques. Results: A total of 1,291 pts were included in the analysis. After cloning, 2,144 cases could be stratified to the synthetical arms of &lt;6 M (26.5%), 6-12 M (31.4%) or &gt;12 M (42.1%) treatment continuation after achieving PR or CR. Adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that treatment until progressive disease (PD) or &gt; 12 M after remission resulted in prolonged progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to the &lt; 6 M arm (hazard ratio (HR): 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.6-0.9] and HR: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.5-0.9], respectively).This effect was more pronounced in PR (HR 0.66 for OS) than in (HR 0.84 for OS). Treatment for 6-12 M compared to &lt; 6 M also showed a trend towards prolonged PFS and OS (HR: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.7-1.1] and HR: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.6-1.1], respectively). Conclusions: This study showed PFS and OS benefit for pts continuing on treatment for &gt; 12 M or until progression after achieving PR or CR compared to pts treated for &lt; 6 M. [Table: see text]