Prolonged Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery in Relapsed Platinum-Sensitive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Secondary cytoreductive surgery is a treatment option for relapsed platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer, but no clear indications are defined for the procedure. This systematic review aims to establish clear indications and compare outcomes versus standard-of-care chemotherapy. We conducted an electronic literature search across three databases and identified 2033 articles, including three phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCT). The review adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (no. CRD42022379817). Despite varying patient selection methods, surgery plus chemotherapy demonstrated significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared to chemotherapy alone. However, overall survival outcomes were inconsistent: while GOG-0213 did not show extended overall survival, recent studies with stricter defined criteria for surgery (SOC-1 and DESKTOP-III) reported improved overall survival with the addition of surgery. Morbidity and mortality rates were low, with no difference in quality of life between the surgery and no-surgery groups. In conclusion, cytoreductive surgery presents a promising option for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer treatment. Nonetheless, well-defined selection criteria appear crucial for achieving increased overall survival compared to conventional treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Fruquintinib-Based Treatment in Patients with Refractory Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma after Developing Resistance to Several TKIs: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved as second-line therapy in refractory sarcoma, prolonging progression-free survival (PFS) but with short-lived duration of disease control. Fruquintinib is a TKI that specifically inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1,2,3 with no metabolism by liver enzymes. In this retrospective study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib-based treatment in patients with refractory sarcoma after developing several lines of TKI resistance. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with refractory sarcoma after they had developed several lines of resistance to TKIs and who received fruquintinib-based treatment from November 2021 to August 2023. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival rate at 4 months (4m-PFSR). Secondary endpoints were the median PFS, overall survival (OS), objective response rate, disease control rate, and adverse effects (AEs). PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A log-rank test was used to compare survival curves between different clinical and pathological factors. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to identify PFS-related prognostic factors. We included 124 patients: 56 (45.2%) with osteosarcoma, 28 (22.6%) with Ewing sarcoma, seven (5.6%) with chondrosarcoma, and 33 (26.6%) with soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Only 18 (14.5%) patients received monotherapy with fruquintinib. With a median follow-up time of 6.8 (interquartile range [IQR], 4.6-9.4) months, 22 (17.7%) patients had partial response and 78 (62.9%) had stable disease. The 4m-PFSR was 58.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.6%-67.1%). The median PFS and OS were 4.4 (95% CI, 3.9-5.0) months and 11.4 (95% CI, 10.3-12.5) months. In multivariate analysis, a high hazard ratio for progression was associated with target lesions located outside the lung and bone with 1.79 (95% CI, 1.10-2.93; p = 0.020). Eighty-eight AEs were recorded in 47 (37.9%) patients; the most common were pneumothorax (18/124, 14.5%), diarrhea (8/124, 6.5%), oral mucositis (7/124, 5.6%), and thrombocytopenia (7/124, 5.6%). Fruquintinib may be a potential option for patients with refractory sarcoma after developing several lines of TKI resistance, with a satisfactory efficacy and safety profile in combination therapy. However, the degree of contribution of fruquintinib to results is unclear when combined with other effective substances. Additional prospective trials of fruquintinib should be conducted, especially involving different pathological types and combination regimens.

A Podcast on Practical Considerations in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Cancer Receiving First-Line Cisplatin- or Carboplatin-Based Chemotherapy Followed by Avelumab Maintenance in a Changing Therapeutic Landscape.

Platinum-based chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma for decades, based on its proven efficacy and well-characterized safety profile. Although enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab showed superior efficacy versus platinum-based chemotherapy in the EV-302 phase 3 trial, common and potentially cumulative toxicities associated with EV plus pembrolizumab may make this combination less suitable for some patients, such as those with pre-existing neuropathy, hyperglycemia, or hepatic impairment, or patients likely to have favorable outcomes with platinum-based chemotherapy. The availability of EV plus pembrolizumab in various countries may also be limited by financial considerations. Thus, platinum-based chemotherapy is likely to remain a valuable option for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Eligibility for cisplatin- or carboplatin-based regimens can be determined by assessing renal function, performance status, and specific comorbidities. In cisplatin-eligible and -ineligible patients without disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy, avelumab first-line maintenance is standard of care based on findings from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial, which showed that avelumab first-line maintenance plus best supportive care prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival compared with best supportive care alone across clinically relevant subgroups. Adverse events associated with avelumab were generally consistent with those observed with other immune checkpoint inhibitors, and long-term follow-up showed no new safety concerns with prolonged treatment. Efficacy benefits and safety profiles were similar in patients who received avelumab first-line maintenance after cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. The effectiveness and safety of avelumab first-line maintenance have been confirmed in several real-world studies. Overall, these data support the use of avelumab first-line maintenance for all platinum-treated patients without disease progression. In this podcast, we discuss the evolving role of platinum-based chemotherapy in this disease setting in the context of EV-302 trial results and describe practical considerations in patients receiving first-line cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy followed by avelumab maintenance therapy.

Fasting Blood Glucose-Based Novel Predictors in Detecting Metastases and Predicting Prognosis for Patients with PNENs

Objective: To explore three novel fasting blood glucose (FBG)-based novel indicators, including the FBG-to-albumin ratio (FAR), FBG-to-lymphocytes ratio (FLR), and FBG-to-hemoglobin ratio (FHR), in predicting prognosis and detecting metastasis for patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) after resection. Materials and Methods: A total of 178 pNENs patients who underwent surgical resection were included in this study. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnosis values of FAR, FLR, and FHR, and the cutoff values were obtained for further analyses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the independent predictors. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the pNENs patients. Results: The optimal cutoff values of FAR, FLR, and FHR were 0.17, 2.85, and 0.028, respectively. As for PFS, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.693 for FAR, 0.690 for FLR, and 0.661 for FHR, respectively. The AUC was 0.770, 0.692, and 0.715 accordingly for OS. The groups with lower FAR, FLR, and FHR were significantly associated with prolonged PFS and OS (p < 0.05). In patients with metastasis, the lower FAR group was correlated with significantly longer PFS and OS (p = 0.022 and 0.002, respectively). The FLR was an independent predictor of PFS in pNENs patients, and the FAR was a predictor of OS. FAR was an independent indicator of PFS in patients with metastasis. Conclusions: Preoperative FAR, FLR, and FHR are effective in predicting the prognosis of pNEN patients and detecting the synchronous metastases.

Central nervous system efficacy of aumolertinib versus gefitinib in patients with untreated, EGFR-mutated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer: data from a randomized phase III trial (AENEAS).

The initial randomized, double-blinded, actively controlled, phase III ANEAS study (NCT03849768) demonstrated that aumolertinib showed superior efficacy relative to gefitinib as first-line therapy in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Metastatic disease in the central nervous system (CNS) remains a challenge in the management of NSCLC. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of aumolertinib versus gefitinib among patients with baseline CNS metastases in the ANEAS study. Eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to orally receive either aumolertinib or gefitinib in a double-blinded fashion. Patients with asymptomatic, stable CNS metastases were included. Follow-up imaging of the same modality as the initial CNS imaging was performed every 6 weeks for 15 months, then every 12 weeks. CNS response was assessed by a neuroradiological blinded, independent central review (neuroradiological-BICR). The primary endpoint for this subgroup analysis was CNS progression-free survival (PFS). Of the 429 patients enrolled and randomized in the ANEAS study, 106 patients were found to have CNS metastases (CNS Full Analysis Set, cFAS) at baseline by neuroradiological-BICR, and 60 of them had CNS target lesions (CNS Evaluable for Response, cEFR). Treatment with aumolertinib significantly prolonged median CNS PFS compared with gefitinib in both cFAS (29.0 vs. 8.3 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.56; P < 0.001) and cEFR (29.0 vs. 8.3 months; HR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11-0.57; P < 0.001). The confirmed CNS overall response rate in cEFR was 85.7% and 75.0% in patients treated with aumolertinib and gefitinib, respectively. Competing risk analysis showed that the estimated probability of CNS progression without prior non-CNS progression or death was consistently lower with aumolertinib than with gefitinib in patients with and without CNS metastases at baseline. No new safety findings were observed. These results indicate a potential advantage of aumolertinib over gefitinib in terms of CNS PFS and the risk of CNS progression in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC with baseline CNS metastases. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03849768.

Evaluating the Clinical Impact and Feasibility of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Pazopanib in a Real-World Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Cohort.

Pazopanib is registered for metastatic renal cell carcinoma and soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). Its variable pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics and narrow therapeutic range provide a strong rationale for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Prior studies have defined target levels of drug exposure (≥20.5 mg/L) linked to prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), but the added value of using TDM remains unclear. This study investigates the effect of TDM of pazopanib in patients with STS on survival outcomes and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and evaluates the feasibility of TDM-guided dosing. A TDM-guided cohort was compared to a non-TDM-guided cohort for PFS, overall survival (OS) and DLTs. PK samples were available from all patients, though not acted upon in the non-TDM-guided cohort. We evaluated the feasibility of TDM by comparing the proportion of underdosed patients in our TDM cohort with data from previous publications. A total of 122 STS patients were included in the TDM-guided cohort (n = 95) and non-TDM-guided cohort (n = 27). The average exposure in the overall population was 30.5 mg/L and was similar in both groups. Median PFS and OS did not differ between the TDM-guided cohort and non-TDM-guided cohort (respectively 5.5 vs 4.4 months, p = 0.3, and 12.6 vs 10.1 months, p = 0.8). Slightly more patients in the non-TDM-guided cohort experienced DLTs (54%) compared to the TDM-guided cohort (44%). The proportion of underdosed patients (13.3%) was halved compared to historical data (26.7%). TDM reduced the proportion of patients with subtherapeutic exposure levels by ~50%. Nonetheless, the added value of TDM for achieving target trough levels of ≥20.5 mg/L for pazopanib on survival outcomes could not be confirmed in STS patients.

The effect of BMI on survival outcome of breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The main goal of the present research is to explore the potential link of body mass index (BMI) with different survival metrics in breast cancer patients. Our aim is to offer the latest and most thorough meta-analysis, assessing the strength and reliability of the connection that BMI has with prognostic indicators in this disease. As of January 2024, we conducted a systematic literature search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. Our search aimed to identify studies examining BMI as an exposure factor, with breast cancer patients constituting the study population, and utilizing adjusted hazard ratio (HR) as the data type of interest. The evidence synthesis incorporated a total of 61 eligible articles involving 201,006 patients. Being underweight posed a risk factor for overall survival (OS) in breast cancer patients compared to normal weight (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.98-1.35; P = 0.08). Overweight or obesity, in comparison to normal weight, was a risk factor for OS (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.14-1.23; P < 0.00001), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08-1.13; P < 0.00001), relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.22; P = 0.03), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11-1.26; P < 0.00001), but not for progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.10; P = 0.33). Notably, in subgroup analyses, overweight patients achieved prolonged PFS (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-0.99; P = 0.04), and compared to the obese population, the overweight cohort exhibited a significant difference in OS (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.16; P < 0.00001) and DFS (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.10; P = 0.0004), with a considerably stronger association. Furthermore, compared to HER- patients, HER + patients exhibited a greater predictive value for OS (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10-1.37; P = 0.0004), RFS (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03-1.64; P < 0.00001), and DFS (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03-1.17; P = 0.003). The results of our meta-analysis reveal a notable association between BMI and various survival measures in breast cancer prognosis. These findings provide a solid basis for predicting breast cancer outcomes and implementing more effective therapeutic approaches.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates: The New Treatment Approaches for Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer (OC), accounting for approximately 200,000 deaths worldwide annually, is a heterogeneous disease showing major differences in terms of its incidence, tumor behavior, and outcomes across histological subtypes. In OC, primary chemotherapy, paclitaxel carboplatin, bevacizumab, and PARP inhibitors have shown prolonged progression-free survival and a favorable overall response rate compared to conventional treatments. However, treatment options for platinum-resistant recurrence cases are limited, with no effective therapies that significantly prolong the prognosis. Recently, mirvetuximab soravtansine, an alpha-folate receptor (FRα)-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with FRα-positive recurrent epithelial OC (EOC). This approval was based on a Phase II study, which demonstrated its efficacy in such patients. ADCs comprise an antibody, a linker, and a payload, representing new concept agents without precedence. Advanced clinical studies are developing ADCs for patients with OC, targeting solid tumors such as gynecologic cancer. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating ADCs targeting FRα and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, trophoblast cell surface antigen-2, sodium-dependent phosphate transport protein 2B, and cadherin-6 in Phase II/III studies. In this review, we summarize the existing evidence supporting the use of ADCs in OC, discuss ongoing clinical trials and preclinical studies, and explore the potential of these innovative agents to address the challenges in OC treatment.

Unraveling the influence of TTF-1 expression on immunotherapy outcomes in PD-L1-high non-squamous NSCLC: a retrospective multicenter study

IntroductionSeveral studies explored the association between thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) and the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy. However, the effect of TTF-1 on the therapeutic efficacy of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor/chemoimmunotherapy in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-Sq NSCLC) with a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score of 50% or more who are highly susceptible to immunotherapy remains unresolved. Therefore, we evaluated whether TTF-1 has a clinical impact on this population.MethodsPatients with non-Sq NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression who received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy between May 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Treatment efficacy was compared after adjusting for baseline differences using propensity score matching.ResultsAmong the 446 patients with NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression, 266 patients with non-Sq NSCLC were analyzed. No significant differences in therapeutic efficacy were observed between the TTF-1-positive and -negative groups in the overall and propensity score-matched populations. Of chemoimmunotherapy, pemetrexed containing regimen significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared to chemoimmunotherapy without pemetrexed, regardless of TTF-1 expression (TTF1 positive; HR: 0.46 (95% Confidence interval: 0.26-0.81), p&amp;lt;0.01, TTF-1 negative; HR: 0.29 (95% Confidence interval: 0.09-0.93), p=0.02).DiscussionTTF-1 expression did not affect the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in patients with non-Sq NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression. In this population, pemetrexed-containing chemoimmunotherapy demonstrated superior anti-tumor efficacy, irrespective of TTF-1 expression.

Understanding the experience, treatment preferences and goals of people living with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in Australia

BackgroundListening to patient voices is critical, in terms of how people experience their condition as well as their treatment preferences. This research explored the patient journey, therapy attributes and goals among treatment experienced adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We sought to understand patient experiences, needs and expectations to identify areas for improvement of treatment and care delivery.MethodsTwo online surveys were developed for completion by CLL patients. In Stage 1, participants completed a best-worst scaling (BWS) task to evaluate eleven previously validated healthcare journey moments that matter (MTM). Responses were used to generate the patient experience index (PEI) score. In Stage 2, participants completed a survey that included both a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to assess drivers of treatment preferences by evaluating the relative attribute importance (RAI) of seven features and a BWS exercise which explored long-term treatment goals.ResultsTwenty-five patients completed Stage 1 and thirty patients Stage 2. Treatment experience was balanced between oral and intravenous medication. The most important/least satisfied MTM were treatment effectiveness, access to support and other treatments as well as monitoring progress. The median PEI score was 66.2 (out of 100). DCE results demonstrated that patients most value treatments for CLL that are associated with prolonged progression free survival (PFS; RAI: 24.6%), followed by treatments that have a lower risk of severe side effects and lower out-of-pocket costs (RAI: 19.5%, 17.4%, respectively). The remainder of the weight in decision making (38.5%) was split between the remaining attributes, namely ‘mild to moderate side effects’ (13.4%), ‘long-term risks’ (12.2%), type of treatment (i.e., oral, IV or a combination of oral and IV; 8.7%) and treatment duration (i.e., ongoing versus fixed; 4.2%). Patients preferred oral to intravenous therapy. The most valued long-term treatment goal was to be physically healthy, followed by living a long life, spending time with family/friends, and avoiding hospitalization.ConclusionTreatment experienced patients with CLL are focused on receiving effective, safe therapies and value long PFS. Consideration and discussion of other attributes, such as once daily dosing, oral only medication, out-of-pocket costs and access to support services may affect patient treatment choices and ultimately enhance their healthcare experience and outcomes.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of frontline immunotherapy combinations in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a network meta-analysis highlighting the value of PD-L1 expression positivity scores

IntroductionThe systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) consolidate all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to initial immunotherapy treatments for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Our goal is to thoroughly assess the effectiveness and safety of various immunotherapy methods, focusing on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with advanced ESCC positive for PD-L1.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, covering all records from their inception until January 22, 2024. The inclusion criteria targeted patients with advanced ESCC undergoing first-line immunotherapy or chemotherapy, limiting the study selection to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exclusively. The study upholds the values of openness, originality, and dependability, as evidenced by its enrollment in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024504992).ResultsOur analysis encompasses 7 RCTs, totaling 4688 patients, and evaluates 8 distinct immunotherapy combinations. In advanced ESCC patients irrespective of PD-L1 expression, both sintilimab-chemotherapy and toripalimab-chemotherapy regimens demonstrated comparable OS benefits (HR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.64-1.33). The most pronounced PFS advantages were seen with sintilimab-chemotherapy and camrelizumab-chemotherapy as compared to standard chemotherapy (HR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.46-0.58). Notably, camrelizumab-chemotherapy (HR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.59-1.16) and nivolumab-ipilimumab (HR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.60-1.17) demonstrated significant safety profiles over chemotherapy alone. Subgroup analysis based on PD-L1 expression revealed nivolumab-chemotherapy to yield the highest OS benefit (HR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.37-0.79) in ESCC patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1%. Furthermore, camrelizumab-chemotherapy (HR=0.51, 95% CI: 0.39-0.67) exhibited superior PFS benefits. Among patients with PD-L1 expression ≥10%, camrelizumab-chemotherapy (HR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.35-0.78) emerged as the most efficacious in improving OS, while serplulimab-chemotherapy (HR=0.48, 95% CI: 0.34-0.68) was associated with the longest PFS benefit.ConclusionThe integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy appears to significantly enhance survival outcomes in patients with advanced ESCC compared to chemotherapy alone. Sintilimab-chemotherapy is potentially the optimal regimen for patients without PD-L1 expression. In contrast, nivolumab-chemotherapy and camrelizumab-chemotherapy are likely to offer the best OS and PFS benefits, respectively, in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1%. Among those with PD-L1 expression ≥10%, camrelizumab-chemotherapy is projected to provide the greatest OS advantage, whereas serplulimab-chemotherapy is anticipated to offer the most prolonged PFS benefit. Since most of the patients in this study originated from Asia, the above findings are more applicable to the Asian population.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024504992.

Efficacy and safety of multikinase inhibitors for patients with refractory thyroid cancer: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) improve the treatment of refractory thyroid cancer, included radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR-DTC) and advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma (aMTC). This study aims to compare the efficacy of MKIs in improving survival outcomes and safety. Comprehensive database searches of MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane performed from inception to December 2023. Three independent authors selected these studies. Randomised-controlled trials that compared the use of a MKI to other MKIs or placebo were included. This review followed PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias was analyzed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. Treatments were grouped into common nodes based on the type of MKI. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included objective response rate, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, and adverse events. Cabozantinib 60 mg/d (CAB60) was associated with the highest prolonged PFS in RAIR-DTC patients, followed by lentivatinib 18 or 24 mg/d (LEN18 or LEN24), and apatinib. PFS was also improved in in aMTC patients received CAB 140 mg/d (CAB140), CAB60, or anlotinib. A significantly greater improvement on the performance of OS was seen in CAB60, LEN24, anlotinib, and sorafenib in RAIR-DTC patients, but which in aMTC patients were lack of statistical differences. Compared with the low-dose of MKIs, high-dose of MKIs such as CAB, LEN, and vandetanib increased the incidence of adverse events. CAB60, LEN, and apatinib are promising topical MKIs with statistically significant primary outcomes in RAIR-DTC patients, while CAB and anlotinib are effective in prolonging PFS in aMTC patients.

Identification of peripheral blood test parameters predicting the response to palbociclib and endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective study in a single institution.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors have been used in endocrine therapy for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer. Although randomized trials have shown that combined therapies prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in comparison to endocrine monotherapy, the predictors of efficacy are unknown. This study aimed to identify the blood test parameters to predict the effects of palbociclib and endocrine therapy. Seventy-nine patients treated with palbociclib and endocrine therapy between December 2017 and June 2022 were reviewed. We assessed PFS in patients according to factors evaluated based on patient characteristics and peripheral blood tests. Patients in the C-reactive protein (CRP)-high, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-high, and albumin (Alb)-low groups had significantly shorter PFS than those in the normal group. A multivariate analysis revealed that high LDH and low Alb levels were independent factors that affected PFS. The Alb-low group had an inferior disease control rate. Patients in the CRP-high, LDH-high, and Alb-low groups who received these therapies as first- or second-line treatments showed poor PFS. Several predictors of the efficacy of palbociclib and endocrine therapy were identified in the peripheral blood test parameters of patients with ER-positive and HER2-negative subtypes of metastatic breast cancer.

Immune-related adverse events can predict progression-free and overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BackgroundDifferent combination therapies using anti - PD-1 / PD-L1 or CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) are widely used in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In the absents of established biomarkers, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been discussed as potential predictors of response. MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, data of 134 patients with mRCC undergoing ICI treatment (Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab and Axitinib or Avelumab and Axitinib) between 2015 and 2021 were analyzed. To examine the utility of irAEs as predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), separate Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional regression analyses were applied. Landmark analysis was conducted after 12 weeks to reduce immortal time bias. ResultirAEs were observed in 85 patients (63.4%). Cutaneous (n=52, 38.8%), endocrine (n=33, 24.6%) and hepatic (n=19, 14.2%) irAEs were most commonly observed. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients experiencing irAEs showed favorable median PFS (15 months, 95% CI 9.91-20.09) compared to the non-irAE subgroup (5 months, 95% CI 3.56-6.44, p<0.001). The median OS was 25 months (95% CI 16.79-33.21) in the non-irAE subgroup, while it was not reached in the irAE subgroup (p=0.002). In multivariable analysis, the presence of any irAE was associated with favorable PFS [HR 0.46 (95% CI 0.26-0.82) p=0.008] and OS [HR: 0.28 (95% CI 0.12-0.63) p=0.002], respectively. Landmark analysis after 12 weeks showed mixed results depending on the classification of the irAE subgroup at the landmark time. ConclusionThe presence of irAEs under ICI therapy in patients with mRCC is associated with better PFS and OS. Thus, manageable irAEs should not be cause for premature discontinuation of ICI therapy, as they seem to indicate favorable outcomes.Considering the time-dependent nature of irAEs is crucial estimating their value as predictive markers. Micro-AbstractImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are widely used in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This study analyzed immune-related adverse events (irAE) as predictors of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in a real-world setting and found the presence of irAE to be associated with prolonged PFS and OS.

Prognostic Value of Alpha-Fetoprotein in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with Lenvatinib and Camrelizumab.

This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) who underwent hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab. A retrospective review was conducted on patients with u-HCC receiving treatment with HAIC combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab. Early AFP response was defined as a >20% decrease in AFP within 4 weeks, and AFP response as a >75% decrease in AFP within 8 weeks. The correlation between early AFP response, AFP response, therapeutic response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) was investigated. The study included 63 patients. AFP responders exhibited superior objective response rates compared to AFP non-responders, as determined by RECIST v1.1 or mRECIST criteria (45.5 vs. 18.2%, p=0.014, or 81.8 vs. 48.5%, p=0.013). Furthermore, early AFP responders demonstrated prolonged OS (not reached vs. 8.0 months, p<0.001) and PFS (13.3 vs. 3.0 months, p= 0.018) relative to early AFP non-responders. Similarly, AFP responders exhibited improved OS (not reached vs. 9.0 months, p<0.001) and PFS (19.3 vs. 5.1 months, p=0.002) compared to AFP non-responders. Multivariate analysis results indicated that both early AFP response and AFP response independently predicted OS [hazard ratio (HR) 2.963, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.333-6.585, p=0.008, and HR 6.182, 95% CI 1.780-21.466, p=0.004] and PFS (HR 2.186, 95% CI 1.107-4.318, p=0.024, and HR 3.078, 95% CI 1.407-6.730, p=0.005), serving as significant prognostic values. Early AFP response and AFP response serve as predictive biomarkers for the effectiveness of HAIC combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab in patients with u-HCC.

Systematic review on the efficacy and safety of ixabepilone-based chemotherapy regimen in triple-negative breast cancer

Context: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has poor prognosis, high mortality, and recurrence rates. Ixabepilone or ixempra could be a promising agent for TNBC, especially in the taxane- and/or anthracycline-resistant population. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ixabepilone-based chemotherapy compared to ixabepilone-free chemotherapy in TNBC patients. Methods: This review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. The eligibility criteria included randomized control trials (RCTs) in 2013-2023 comparing ixabepilone-based with ixabepilone-free chemotherapy regimen in TNBC. Results: This study identified four eligible RCTs. One study showed that patients treated with ixabepilone had a significant improvement in disease-free survival, had a better response, and a lower risk of disease recurrence compared to those treated with taxane-based regimen. However, two studies showed no differences in terms of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and pathological complete responses rates in both treatment arms. Ixabepilone addition to capecitabine significantly prolonged progression-free survival and objective response rate in TNBC patients, but did not significantly improve OS (n = 1). Conclusions: The effectiveness and safety of ixabepilone-based chemotherapy versus ixabepilone-free treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients vary among studies. More research is needed to better understand the effectiveness and safety of ixabepilone-based chemotherapy versus ixabepilone-free treatment in TNBC patients.

A randomized phase 2 study of HLX22 plus trastuzumab biosimilar HLX02 and XELOX as first-line therapy for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the fourth most common cause of cancer death worldwide, yet the prognosis of advanced disease remains poor. This was a randomized, double-blinded, phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04908813). Patients with locally advanced/metastatic HER2-positive gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer and no prior systemic antitumor therapy were randomized 1:1:1 to 25mg/kg HLX22 (a novel anti-HER2 antibody)+ HLX02 (trastuzumab biosimilar)+ oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) (group A), 15mg/kg HLX22+ HLX02+ XELOX (group B), or placebo+ HLX02+ XELOX (group C) in 3-week cycles. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) assessed by independent radiological review committee (IRRC). Between November 29, 2021, and June 6, 2022, 82 patients were screened; 53 were randomized to group A (n= 18), B (n= 17), and C (n= 18). With 14.3months of median follow-up, IRRC-assessed median PFS was prolonged with the addition of HLX22 (A vs. C, 15.1 vs. 8.2months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-1.27]; B vs. C, not reached vs. 8.2months, HR 0.1 [95% CI 0.04-0.52]). Confirmed ORR was comparable among groups (A vs. B vs. C, 77.8% vs. 82.4% vs. 88.9%). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 18 (100%), 16 (94.1%), and 17 (94.4%) patients, respectively. One (5.6%) patient in group C reported a grade 5 TRAE. Adding HLX22 to HLX02 and XELOX prolonged PFS and enhanced antitumor response in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive gastric cancer, with manageable safety. Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc.

LINC01432 binds to CELF2 in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma promoting short progression-free survival to standard therapy.

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a highly prevalent and incurable form of cancer that arises from malignant plasma cells, with over 35,000 new cases diagnosed annually in the United States. While there are a growing number of approved therapies, MM remains incurable and nearly all patients will relapse and exhaust all available treatment options. Mechanisms for disease progression are unclear and in particular, little is known regarding the role of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) in mediating disease progression and response to treatment. In this study, we used transcriptome sequencing to compare newly diagnosed MM patients who had short progression-free survival (PFS) to standard first-line treatment (PFS < 24 months) to patients who had prolonged PFS (PFS > 24 months). We identified 157 differentially upregulated lncRNAs with short PFS and focused our efforts on characterizing the most upregulated lncRNA, LINC01432. We investigated LINC01432 overexpression and CRISPR/Cas9 knockdown in MM cell lines to show that LINC01432 overexpression significantly increases cell viability and reduces apoptosis, while knockdown significantly reduces viability and increases apoptosis, supporting the clinical relevance of this lncRNA. Next, we used individual-nucleotide resolution cross-linking immunoprecipitation with RT-qPCR to show that LINC01432 directly interacts with the RNA binding protein, CELF2. Lastly, we showed that LINC01432-targeted locked nucleic acid antisense oligonucleotides reduce viability and increases apoptosis. In summary, this fundamental study identified lncRNAs associated with short PFS to standard NDMM treatment and further characterized LINC01432, which inhibits apoptosis.

Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting beads versus lipiodol in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: propensity score matching.

Since the introduction of drug-eluting beads (DEB), the result comparing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) using lipiodol, also called conventional transarterial chemoembolization (c-TACE), and DEB-TACE shows considerable controversy. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of c-TACE and DEB-TACE to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). This retrospective study used propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to analyze clinical data from 113 cases of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated at our hospital from September 2016 to July 2021. The safety and efficacy of the two treatment modalities were analyzed after 1:1 matching. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rates (DCRs), and objective response rates (ORRs) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and postoperative complications. Twenty-nine patients underwent DEB-TACE and 84 received c-TACE; 28 pairs of patients were eventually matched. After matching, baseline characteristics between groups were comparable. The median PFS of the DEB-TACE group was 10 months compared to 6 months in the c-TACE group (P=0.002). The median OS was 23 months in the DEB-TACE group vs. 14 months in the c-TACE group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.265). The ORR at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months in the DEB-TACE group (69%, 78%, 60%, and 52%) were significantly higher than those in the c-TACE group (39%, 39%, 26%, and 8%) (P<0.05). The DCR at postoperative 3 months was significantly higher in the DEB-TACE group (95%) (P<0.05). There was one case of postoperative liver abscess in the DEB-TACE group, and the patient recovered well after drainage. No serious complications occurred. Compared to c-TACE, DEB-TACE prolonged PFS and exhibited better short-term ORR with a similar level of safety. However, there was no significant advantage in terms of OS.

Efficacy and safety of sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy for recurrent extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective study.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) no longer are approved for second-line or later treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), and have not been studied in combination with chemotherapy. Exploring the efficacy and safety of second-line or later immunotherapy for ES-SCLC is an urgent clinical question that needs to be addressed, and combination therapies are an important research direction. This study intended to investigate the efficacy and safety of the sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy as a second-line and beyond treatment option for ES-SCLC. Medical records of patients who received treatment with sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone as a second-line or beyond therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The study evaluated efficacy and safety. Indicators of efficacy included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety indicators included adverse events (AEs). This cohort comprised of 46 patients: 24 in the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group and 22 in the chemotherapy group. Chemotherapy received by both groups was either albumin-bound paclitaxel or irinotecan. Compared with the chemotherapy group, the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group had higher ORR and DCR (ORR: 37.5% vs. 9.1%, P=0.04; DCR: 75.0% vs. 40.9%, P=0.04), and significantly prolonged PFS and OS [median PFS (mPFS): 5.07 vs. 2.45 months, P=0.006; median OS (mOS): 14.43 vs. 10.34 months, P=0.009]. Also, there was no significant increase in the incidence of AEs in the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group, which was well tolerated by patients. Sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy is superior to single-agent chemotherapeutic treatment as second-line or later therapy in ES-SCLC patients who have not received prior immunotherapy. These results need to be confirmed in future clinical trials.