You have accessJournal of UrologyUrinary Diversion: Bladder Reconstruction, Augmentation, Substitution, Diversion II1 Apr 2010948 PERITONEUM PRESERVING RETROGRADE RADICAL CYSTECTOMY FOR ELDERLY AND HIGH RISK BLADDER CANCER PATIENTS Senji Hoshi, Taku Yamamuro, Yukihiko Ogata, Kenji Numahata, and Osamu Sugano Senji HoshiSenji Hoshi More articles by this author , Taku YamamuroTaku Yamamuro More articles by this author , Yukihiko OgataYukihiko Ogata More articles by this author , Kenji NumahataKenji Numahata More articles by this author , and Osamu SuganoOsamu Sugano More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.1827AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Radical cystectomy is gold standard of treatment of invasive bladder cancer. However, for elderly patients more than 70 yeas old, mortality rate of perioperative time is reported 8.8% (AUA06-Abstract No. 31). The most common postoperative complication is prolonged ileus. For elderly and high risk patients, we are selecting completely extraperitoneal cystectomy, and single stoma bilateral ureterocutaneostomy with Toyoda Method (J Urol, 117, 276). We established easy technique of complete peritoneum preserving retrograde radical cystectomy. At first, prostatic deep vein complex and urethra are dissected. Prostate and seminal vesicle were dissected retrogradely. Bilateral ureters are dissected at the distal end and retrograde cystectomy is done. Peritoneum detachment from bladder is easily done because peritoneum is rising like as a tent and peritoneum bladder adhesion line is easily detected. Operation time is short and no peritoneal defect. Then we compared the time of peritoneum detachment from bladder up to now ante-grade procedure and new technique of retrograde procedure. METHODS Twenty patients of old age male bladder cancer, mean age 75, range 73-83, candidate for radical cystectomy and ureterocutaneostomy were divided randomly. And 10 were performed ante-grade peritoneum detachment (AD) from bladder and 10 were performed retrograde peritoneum detachment (RD). Informed consent was obtained. From the operation video of each patient, operation time of AD and RD was calculated. In all patients, the double barreled single ureterocutaneostomy stoma was created with Toyoda Method (J Urol, 117, 276). Operative time of ureterocutaneostomy was also compared with neoblader diversion (15) or ilial conduit diversion (30). The operations were performed by single surgeon (SH). RESULTS Mean time and range of AD and RD was 25 minutes, 20-38 minutes and 15 minutes, 10-20 minutes, respectively (p<0.01). Operation time requiring peritoneum detachment from bladder with RD was clearly shorter than that with AD. Mean operation time of ureterocutaneostomy was clearly shorter than those of neoblader diversion or ilial conduit diversion(p<0.01). All patients ureterocutaneostomy diversion could drink and eat the next day of the operation and the median length of hospital stay was shorter than those of neoblader diversion or ilial conduit diversion (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS We established easy and time saving technique of complete peritoneum preserving retrograde radical cystectomy. Yamagata, Japan© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e369 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Senji Hoshi More articles by this author Taku Yamamuro More articles by this author Yukihiko Ogata More articles by this author Kenji Numahata More articles by this author Osamu Sugano More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...