Prolapse Size Research Articles

Variations in structural support site failure patterns by prolapse size on stress 3D MRI.

Our objective was to develop a standardized measurement system to evaluate structural support site failures among women with anterior vaginal wall-predominant prolapse according to increasing prolapse size using stress three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ninety-one women with anterior vaginal wall-predominant prolapse and uterus in situ who had undergone research stress 3D MRI were included for analysis. The vaginal wall length and width, apex and paravaginal locations, urogenital hiatus diameter, and prolapse size were measured at maximal Valsalva on MRI. Subject measurements were compared to established measurements in 30 normal controls without prolapse using a standardized z-score measurement system. A z-score greater than 1.28, or the 90th percentile in controls, was considered abnormal. The frequency and severity of structural support site failure was analyzed based on tertiles of prolapse size. Substantial variability in support site failure pattern and severity was identified, even between women with the same stage and similar size prolapse. Overall, the most common failed support sites were straining hiatal diameter (91%) and paravaginal location (92%), followed by apical location (82%). Impairment severity z-score was highest for hiatal diameter (3.56) and lowest for vaginal width (1.40). An increase in impairment severity z-score was observed with increasing prolapse size among all support sites across all three prolapse size tertiles (p < 0.01 for all). We identified substantial variation in support site failure patterns among women with different degrees of anterior vaginal wall prolapse using a novel standardized framework that quantifies the number, severity, and location of structural support site failures.

Clinical Pilot Study of Rectal Suppository Containing Combined Extract of Cissus quadrangularis Linn. and Acmella paniculata (Wall ex. DC.) R. K. Jansen in Acute Hemorrhoids.

Background Cissus quadrangularis Linn. (CQ) is a medicinal plant with good evidence for the treatment of hemorrhoids, listed in the Thai National List of Herbal Products in the oral dosage form. Acmella paniculata (Wall ex. DC.) R. K. Jansen. (AP) is a medicinal plant with a local anesthetic effect. Objective To investigate the potential of rectal suppositories containing CQ and AP extracts to alleviate symptoms of hemorrhoids compared with the commercialized rectal suppository containing hydrocortisone and cinchocaine. Materials and Methods Hemorrhoid outpatients (n = 105) with different severity grades (I, II, or III) from eight hospitals in northern Thailand were included in this study. Hemorrhoid severity was graded by proctoscopy associated with either anal pain or bleeding related to hemorrhoids or both. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups: CQ-AP group (n = 52) or the commercialized rectal suppository group (n = 53). One suppository was rectally administered twice daily in the morning and at bedtime for seven days. Evaluations were performed by physicians on days 1, 4, and 8 of the study. The primary endpoints were bleeding and prolapse size, while the secondary endpoint was anal pain. Results Baseline demographics, lifestyle, constipation, number of prolapses, grade of hemorrhoid severity, and duration of experiencing hemorrhoids were comparable in both groups of patients. The effects of CQ-AP and the commercialized rectal suppository on bleeding, prolapse size, and anal pain were comparable. The patients in both groups were satisfied with both products at comparable levels and stated a preference for further use in the case of hemorrhoids recurrence. In terms of safety, the patients in the commercialized rectal suppository group experienced a higher incidence of adverse events, including anal pain and bleeding. Conclusion Rectal suppositories containing a combined extract of CQ and AP show potential in alleviating hemorrhoidal symptoms with a good safety profile.

Mechanisms of hiatus failure in prolapse: a multifaceted evaluation

We investigated whether factors influencing pelvic floor hiatal closure are inter-related or independent, hypothesizing that (1) hiatus size is moderately correlated with levator defect, pelvic floor muscle strength, and change in hiatus size with contraction and (2) urogenital hiatus (UGH) and levator hiatus (LH) measures are similar in patients with anterior wall (AW) and posterior wall (PW) prolapse. This cross-sectional case-control study included subjects with AW prolapse (n = 50), PW prolapse (n = 50), and normal support (n = 50). Hiatus measurements and levator defects were assessed on MRI, and vaginal closure force was measured with an instrumented speculum. Pearson correlation coefficients and simple and multivariable linear regression models were performed. During contraction, LH narrowed 47% more in the PW compared to AW group (p = 0.001). With straining, LH lengthened 34% more in the PW than AW group (p < 0.001). With straining, UGH and LH lengthening was greater by 72% and 44% in those with major compared to no/minor defect (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004). Contraction strength explained, at most, 4% of UGH (r = 0.17) or LH (r = 0.20) shortening during contraction (r = 0.17 and r = 0.20, respectively), indicating that these factors are largely independent. After controlling for prolapse size, resting UGH and levator defect status were associated with straining UGH (p < 0.001, p = 0.004), but muscle strength and resting tone were not. Hiatus measures are complex and differ according to prolapse occurrence and type. They are, at best, only weakly correlated with pelvic floor muscle strength and movement during contraction.

Total colpocleisis technique in huge neglected ulcerated uterovaginal prolapse

We present a video describing the technical considerations for performing a total colpocleisis in the management of significant, neglected, ulcerated, and symptomatic complete uterovaginal prolapse. A 79-year-old debilitated woman presented with a large, ulcerated pelvic bulge. A previous attempt at pessary treatment failed because of a disproportion of the pessary with the prolapse size. She had a history of liver insufficiency and hypertension. Obliterative colpocleisis surgery was selected because the healing of a large ulcerated vagina was not likely within a short timeframe. Sharp dissection with scissors and de-epithelialisation of the remaining non-eroded vaginal mucosa with the friction of a sharp-edged surgical knife were performed. Closely located purse strings were used to obliterate potential spaces. Two mirror image triangles in the anterior and posterior vaginal walls were removed. After the formation of a new perineal body, the diamond-shaped vaginal incision was closed vertically to narrow introitus. The patient was discharged on the first postoperative day and an uncomplicated postoperative course ensued. At the 4-week follow-up, there was no evidence of infection, recurrent prolapse, de novo stress incontinence, or voiding with difficulty. Total colpocleisis is an excellent surgical option in women with multiple, large cervicovaginal ulcers and multiple comorbidities with no desire for penetrative vaginal function.

Structural, functional, and symptomatic differences between women with rectocele versus cystocele and normal support

Prolapse of the anterior and posterior vaginal walls has been generally associated with apical descent and levator ani muscle defects. However, the relative contributions of these factors to the pathophysiology of descent in the different vaginal compartments is not well understood. Furthermore, symptoms uniquely associated with prolapse in these compartments have not been well characterized. The objectives of the study were to compare the associations between the following: (1) apical support, (2) levator ani muscles, and (3) pelvic floor symptoms in women with posterior-predominant prolapse, anterior-predominant prolapse, and normal support. This is a cross-sectional study with 2 case arms: 60 women with posterior prolapse, 90 with anterior prolapse, and a referent control arm with 103 asymptomatic subjects with normal support, determined from pelvic organ prolapse quantification examinations. Levator muscle defects were graded from magnetic resonance imaging. Vaginal closure forces above resting were measured with an instrumented speculum during maximal contraction. Pelvic floor symptoms were measured via the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-Short Form. Mean point C location in controls was -6.9 cm [1.5] (mean [standard deviation]); and was higher in posterior prolapse (-4.7 cm [2.7], 2.2 cm below controls) than the anterior prolapse group (-1.2 cm [4.1]; 5.6 cm below controls, P < .001 for all comparisons). Normal-appearing muscles (ie, muscle without a visible defect) occurred at similar frequencies in posterior prolapse (45%) and controls (51%, P= .43) but less often in anterior prolapse (28%, P ≤ .03 for pairwise comparisons). Major levator ani defects occurred at similar rates in women with posterior (33%) and anterior prolapse (42%, P= .27) but less often in controls (16%, P ≤ .012 for both pairwise comparisons). Similarly, there were significant differences in generated vaginal closure forces across the 3 groups, with the prolapse groups generating weaker closure forces than the control group (P= .004), but the differences between the 2 prolapse groups were not significant after controlling for prolapse size (P= .43). Pelvic floor symptoms were more severe for the posterior (mean Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory score, 129) and anterior prolapse groups (score, 128) than the controls (score, 40.2, P < .001 for both comparisons); the difference between the 2 prolapse groups was not significant (P= .83). Posterior-predominant prolapse involves an almost 3-fold less apical descent below normal than anterior-predominant vaginal prolapse. Levator ani defects and muscle impairment also have a lower impact. Pelvic floor symptoms reflect the presence and size of prolapse more than the predominant lax vaginal compartment.

Interactions among pelvic organ protrusion, levator ani descent, and hiatal enlargement in women with and without prolapse

Pelvic organ prolapse has 2 components: (1) protrusion of the pelvic organs beyond the hymen; and (2) descent of the levator ani. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system measures the first component, however, there remains no standard measurement protocol for the second mechanism. We sought to test the hypotheses that: (1) difference in the protrusion area is greater than the area created by levator descent in prolapse patients compared with controls; and (2) prolapse is more strongly associated with levator hiatus compared to urogenital hiatus. Midsagittal magnetic resonance imaging scans from 30 controls, 30 anterior predominant, and 30 posterior predominant prolapse patients were assessed. Levator area was defined as the area above the levator ani and below the sacrococcygeal inferior pubic point line. Protrusion area was defined as the protruding vaginal walls below the levator area. The levator hiatus and urogenital hiatus were measured. Bivariate analysis and multiple comparisons were performed. Bivariate logistic regression was performed to assess prolapse as a function of levator hiatus, urogenital hiatus, levator area, and protrusion. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated. The levator area for the anterior (34.0 ± 6.5 cm2) and posterior (35.7 ± 8.0 cm2) prolapse groups were larger during Valsalva compared to controls (20.9 ± 7.8 cm2, P < .0001 for both); similarly, protrusion areas for the anterior (14.3 ± 6.2 cm2) and posterior (14.4±5.7 cm2) prolapse groups were both larger compared to controls (5.0 ± 1.8 cm2, P < .0001 for both). The levator hiatus length for the anterior (7.2 ± 1 cm) and posterior (6.9 ± 1 cm) prolapse groups were longer during Valsalva compared to controls (5.2 ± 1.5 cm, P < .0001 for both); similarly, urogenital hiatus lengths for the anterior (5.7 ± 1 cm) and posterior (6.3 ± 1.1 cm) prolapse groups were both longer than controls (3.8 ± 0.8 cm, P < .0001 for both). The difference in levator area in prolapse patients compared with controls was greater than the difference in protrusion area (14.0 ± 7.2 cm2 vs 9.4 ± 5.9 cm2, P < .0002). The urogenital hiatus was more strongly associated with prolapse than the levator hiatus (odds ratio, 12.9; 95% confidence interval, 4.1-39.2, and odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-7.5). Levator hiatus and urogenital hiatus are both correlated with levator and protrusion areas, and all were associated with maximum prolapse size (P ≤ .001, for all comparisons). In prolapse, the levator area increases more than the protrusion area and both the urogenital hiatus and levator hiatus are larger. The odds of prolapse for an increase in the urogenital hiatus are 3 times larger than for the levator hiatus, which leads us to reject both the original hypotheses.

A multi-compartment 3-D finite element model of rectocele and its interaction with cystocele

We developed a subject-specific 3-D finite element model to understand the mechanics underlying formation of female pelvic organ prolapse, specifically a rectocele and its interaction with a cystocele. The model was created from MRI 3-D geometry of a healthy 45 year-old multiparous woman. It included anterior and posterior vaginal walls, levator ani muscle, cardinal and uterosacral ligaments, anterior and posterior arcus tendineus fascia pelvis, arcus tendineus levator ani, perineal body, perineal membrane and anal sphincter. Material properties were mostly from the literature. Tissue impairment was modeled as decreased tissue stiffness based on previous clinical studies. Model equations were solved using Abaqus v 6.11. The sensitivity of anterior and posterior vaginal wall geometry was calculated for different combinations tissue impairments under increasing intraabdominal pressure. Prolapse size was reported as pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q) point at point Bp for rectocele and point Ba for cystocele. Results show that a rectocele resulted from impairments of the levator ani and posterior compartment support. For 20% levator and 85% posterior support impairments, simulated rectocele size (at POP-Q point: Bp) increased 0.29mm/cm H2O without apical impairment and 0.36mm/cm H2O with 60% apical impairment, as intraabdominal pressures increased from 0 to 150cm H2O. Apical support impairment could result in the development of either a cystocele or rectocele. Simulated repair of posterior compartment support decreased rectocele but increased a preexisting cystocele. We conclude that development of rectocele and cystocele depend on the presence of anterior, posterior, levator and/or or apical support impairments, as well as the interaction of the prolapse with the opposing compartment.

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in an elderly population with external rectal prolapse: clinical and anal manometric results.

We report the clinical and anal manometric results of elderly patients treated with laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) for full-thickness rectal prolapse. From March 2009 to June 2012, patients were consecutively included. A modified laparoscopic Orr-Loygue procedure with posterior mobilisation was used. The patients were evaluated preoperatively, 2 months postoperatively and after 1 year. We registered Wexner incontinence scores and laxative uses by a questionnaire and performed simple anal manometry. A total of 46 patients underwent operation, all women. The median age was 83 years (range 34-99), median prolapse size was 8 cm (range 2-15), and 30 % had previous prolapse surgery. The median operative time was 135 min (range 90-215), and the median length of stay was 2 days (range 1-14). The 30-day morbidity rate was 15 %, and there were two (4 %) deaths within 30 days. There was a significant reduction in incontinence scores after 2 months and 1 year. The anal resting pressures improved from 10 cm H(2)O slightly to 16 cm H(2)O after 2 months, significantly, and still significant after 1 year at 13 cm H(2)O. There were no changes in the use of laxatives. The median follow-up time was 1.5 years (range 0.5-3), and there were two prolapse recurrences (4 %) in this period. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy with posterior mobilisation seems to be effective and relatively well tolerated, although not without mortality in elderly debilitated patients. It improves incontinence. With increased life-year expectance, these patients may benefit from a lower risk of recurrence compared with perineal procedures.

Post-reduction stress urinary incontinence rates in posterior versus anterior pelvic organ prolapse: a secondary analysis

Stress incontinence with vaginal prolapse reduction is less common in women with posterior-predominant prolapse (rectocele) compared with those with anterior-predominant prolapse (cystocele). This was a secondary analysis of a cohort of prospectively enrolled women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse at or beyond the hymen and prolapse-reduced stress urinary incontinence (SUI) testing. Subjects were included if they had anterior- or posterior-predominant prolapse with at least a 1 cm difference in pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) points Ba and Bp (N = 214). We evaluated the prevalence and risk factors of post-reduction SUI between the two groups. Comparing posterior (n = 45) and anterior (n = 169) prolapse groups, we identified similar rates of post-reduction SUI (posterior: 6/45, 13.3 %; anterior:18/169, 10.7 %; p = 0.52) and SUI without reduction (posterior:4.4 %; anterior:11.2 %; p = 0.26). Maximum prolapse size was slightly larger in anterior than in posterior patients (+3.1 vs +2.0 cm beyond the hymen, p = 0.001), while a higher proportion of posterior subjects reported a prior hysterectomy (p = 0.04). Among posterior subjects, lower maximum urethral closure pressure values (MUCP; p = 0.02) were associated with post-reduction SUI. In contrast, among anterior-predominant prolapse, larger prolapse measured at POP-Q point Ba (p = 0.003) and maximum POP-Q measurement (p = 0.006) were each associated with higher rates of post-reduction SUI and were highly correlated with each other (R = 0.90). We observed similar rates of post-reduction SUI in women with anterior- and posterior-predominant pelvic organ prolapse. Factors affecting the anterior and posterior prolapse groups differed, suggesting different mechanisms of continence protection. These findings suggest that reduction incontinence testing for operative planning would be as relevant to posterior-predominant prolapses as it is to anterior prolapse.

Do repetitive Valsalva maneuvers change maximum prolapse on dynamic MRI?

This study seeks to quantify differences in anterior vaginal wall prolapse during sequential Valsalva attempts on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Subjects were taken from an on-going case-control study evaluating anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Women with a prolapse whose leading edge extended >or=1 cm beyond the hymenal ring were included (n = 40). All subjects performed three maximal Valsalva efforts while mid-sagittal dynamic MRI scans were obtained. Bladder descent between the first, second, and third maximal Valsalva efforts were compared. Forty percent of women had a greater than 2-cm increase in prolapse size from their first to third Valsalva attempt. Ninety-five percent of women extended their prolapse further with a third Valsalva. As is true during clinical examination, several attempts may be required to have maximal anterior compartment prolapse present during dynamic MRI of the pelvic floor.

Structural position of the posterior vagina and pelvic floor in women with and without posterior vaginal prolapse

The objective of the study was to compare pelvic structure location on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during maximal Valsalva among women with posterior prolapse and those with normal support. Subjects (n=37) had posterior vaginal wall (PVW) prolapse of +1 cm or greater. All underwent midsagittal, dynamic MRI. Structure locations (distal vagina, apex, perineal body, external anal sphincter) were determined. PVW length, levator and urogenital hiatus diameters, and prolapse diameter were measured. Subjects had more caudal structures (P<.001) and larger hiatus diameters (P<.005); the posterior wall was longer, whereas the straight-line distance between the apex and distal vagina was shorter. In enteroceles, the apex was more ventrally displaced compared with rectoceles (P=.003). Unlike apical descent (r=-0.3; P=.1), PVW length and point Bp were correlated with MRI prolapse size (r=0.5; P=.002; r=0.7; P<.001, respectively). At maximal Valsalva on MRI, structures are more caudal in women with posterior prolapse. The posterior vaginal wall is longer; this length strongly correlates with prolapse size.

The Impact of Bladder Filling and Time of Day on the Assessment of Genital Prolapse

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate whether it is necessary to consider time of day and bladder filling when assessing genital prolapse. Women with prolapse often experience larger bulge and heaviness in the evening and are more bothered when the bladder is full, but it is unclear whether this has any impact on the evaluation of the prolapse. Traction on the cervix with a tenaculum is still used by some gynecologists in the examination of a prolapse. This may be painful for the patients and it is uncertain whether it yields more information than performing a maximal Valsalva maneuver. Methods: Fifteen patients scheduled for prolapse surgery were examined before 10 am and after 8 pm according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. In addition, traction on the cervix was compared with maximal Valsalva maneuver when assessing the cervical descent. For a clinical difference of 1 cm in prolapse size and a type I error of 5% and a power of 90%, a paired sample of 15 were necessary. Results: No clinically relevant differences could be demonstrated, neither between morning and evening examination nor between examination with a full and empty bladder. There was very good correlation in the cervical descent between maximal Valsalva maneuvers and tenaculum traction on the cervix (correlation coefficient = 0.96, P = 0.001). Conclusions: Traction on the cervix is not necessary if the patient is able to perform the Valsalva maneuver. It is unnecessary to take into account bladder filling and time of day when assessing a genital prolapse.

Validation of an Italian version of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire

Objective: To validate the italian translated version of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire (P-QOL). Study design: The P-QOL questionnaire was translated into Italian and administered to women recruited from a gynaecology outpatient clinic. All women completed a P-QOL questionnaire at the time of the visit, and were examined in left lateral position using the ICS prolapse score. A second P-QOL questionnaire was posted and completed by women 1 week later. The validity was assessed by measuring levels of missing data, comparing symptom scores with objective prolapse stages and between affected and asymptomatic women. The reliability was assessed by testing internal consistency and stability using 1-week test retest analysis. Results: 132 symptomatic and 61 asymptomatic women were studied. The number of missing items was 2%. P-QOL domain scores were significantly different between symptomatic and asymptomatic women ( P<0.001). Severity according to P-QOL strongly correlated with the prolapse size ( P<0.01, ρ>0.5). All items achieved a Cronbach alpha greater than 0.8. The test retest reliability confirmed a highly significant correlation between the total scores for each domain. Conclusion: The Italian version of the P-QOL questionnaire has been validated, providing a reliable, easily comprehensible and valid instrument for the symptomatic assessment of Italian-speaking women with uterovaginal prolapse.