Previous articleNext article No AccessAct and Person in ArgumentC. Perelman and L. Olbrechts-TytecaC. Perelman Search for more articles by this author and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 61, Number 4Jul., 1951 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/290789 Views: 9Total views on this site Citations: 17Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1951 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Iva Svačinová The Thesis of the Effectiveness of Quasi-logical Arguments, Argumentation 33, no.11 (Jul 2018): 75–106.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-018-9464-zFabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton Practical Reasoning Arguments: A Modular Approach, Argumentation 32, no.44 (Jan 2018): 519–547.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-018-9450-5Jenna L. Currie-Mueller Pointing fingers across the tracks: an examination of strategic messages in the Lac-Mégantic rail disaster, Journal of Risk Research 21, no.1010 (Jan 2017): 1197–1216.https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1281338Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton Using Quotations: Their Argumentative Uses and Their Manipulations, (Sep 2017): 1–33.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62545-4_1Chaim Noy , Discourse, Context & Media 16 ( 2017): 39.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.01.005Fabrizio Macagno Manipulating Emotions: Value-Based Reasoning and Emotive Language, Argumentation and Advocacy 51, no.22 (Feb 2017): 103–122.https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2014.11821842Maria Eronen Moral argumentation as a rhetorical practice in popular online discourse: Examples from online comment sections of celebrity gossip, Discourse & Communication 8, no.33 (Aug 2014): 278–298.https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313510818Fabrizio Macagno Strategies of Character Attack, Argumentation 27, no.44 (Jan 2013): 369–401.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-013-9291-1Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton Implicatures as Forms of Argument, (Nov 2013): 203–225.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01011-3_9Fabrizio Macagno Presumptive Reasoning in Interpretation. Implicatures and Conflicts of Presumptions, Argumentation 26, no.22 (Jan 2012): 233–265.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9232-9Pierre-Luc Lalonde, Mario Bourgault, Alain Findeli An empirical investigation of the project situation: PM practice as an inquiry process, International Journal of Project Management 30, no.44 (May 2012): 418–431.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.09.005David A. Frank, William Driscoll A Bibliography of the New Rhetoric Project, Philosophy & Rhetoric 43, no.44 (Jan 2010): 449–466.https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0449David Douglas Dunlap The conception of audience in Perelman and Isocrates: Locating the ideal in the real, Argumentation 7, no.44 (Nov 1993): 461–474.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00711062David S. Kaufer The ironist and hypocrite as presidential symbols: A Nixon‐Kennedy Analog, Communication Quarterly 27, no.44 (May 2009): 20–26.https://doi.org/10.1080/01463377909369347 Wayne C. Booth M. H. Abrams: Historian as Critic, Critic as Pluralist, Critical Inquiry 2, no.33 (Oct 2015): 411–445.https://doi.org/10.1086/447850Ray D. Dearin The philosophical basis of Chaim Perelman's theory of rhetoric, Quarterly Journal of Speech 55, no.33 (Oct 1969): 213–224.https://doi.org/10.1080/00335636909382948Wayne E. Brockriede Toward a contemporary Aristotelian theory of rhetoric, Quarterly Journal of Speech 52, no.11 (Feb 1966): 33–40.https://doi.org/10.1080/00335636609382755