Progression Of Chronic Allograft Nephropathy Research Articles

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in chronic allograft nephropathy.

Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition has been shown to slow progression of chronic allograft nephropathy in animal models, no studies have examined its efficacy in humans. We retrospectively analyzed 63 patients with biopsy-proven chronic allograft nephropathy who had > or =6 months dialysis-free follow-up at our institution. A total of 32 patients treated for > or =6 consecutive months with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and/or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) therapy (group 1) were compared with 31 patients not on these agents (group 2). Except for a higher incidence of hypertension (100 vs. 78%, P=0.005) in group 1, there were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics at time of biopsy. With a mean follow-up time of 27 months in both groups, 6 of 32 (19%) group 1 patients vs. 12 of 31 (39%) group 2 reached the primary endpoint of > or =50% increase in serum creatinine (P=0.10). Mean time to primary endpoint was 46.6 months in group 1 vs. 32.7 months in group 2 (P=0.07). Three of 32 (9%) of group 1 patients vs. 8 of 31 (26%) of group 2 returned to dialysis during this time (P=0.11). Significantly fewer patients in group 1 reached the combined secondary endpoint of allograft failure or death (9.4 vs. 35.5%, P=0.01); in addition, group 1 had a longer mean time to this endpoint (51.2 vs. 37.6 months, P=0.03). On multivariate analysis, the only predictor of progression to primary endpoint was a high baseline serum creatinine (P=0.02). No significant differences in hyperkalemia or anemia were found between the two groups. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition/angiotensin-receptor blocker therapy is well tolerated in renal allograft recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy. It is associated with a trend of slowing renal insufficiency as well as a significant survival benefit in the combined endpoint of allograft failure or death.

Reliability of chronic allograft nephropathy diagnosis in sequential protocol biopsies

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) progresses rapidly during the first few months and slowly thereafter. Although the presence of CAN in protocol renal biopsies is a predictor of outcome, the reliability of this diagnosis according to Banff criteria has not been characterized. Renal lesions were evaluated according to the Banff criteria in sequential protocol biopsies performed at 4 and 14 months in 310 biopsies obtained from 155 patients. CAN progressed from 40 to 53% (P=0.001) while serum creatinine remained stable (146 +/- 44 vs. 147 +/- 48 micromol/L, P=NS). Graft survival in patients with and without CAN in the first biopsy was 74 versus 91% (P < 0.05), and in the second biopsy 75 versus 94% (P < 0.05). In 54 patients (35%) no CAN was present in both biopsies, 39 (25%) showed progression to CAN, 19 (12%) showed regression of CAN, and 43 (28%) showed CAN in both biopsies. Graft survival was: 100%, 81.6%, 82.6% and 69.4%, respectively (P < 0.01). Assuming that CAN does not regress and sampling error is normally distributed, we estimated that 25% of biopsies cannot be properly classified. The increase in the incidence of CAN between the 4th and 14th month is lower than the proportion of misclassified biopsies. Thus, monitoring the progression of CAN by means of two sequential biopsies at 4 and 14 months is inaccurate. We suggest that progression of scarring be monitored by means of a donor and a protocol biopsy performed during the first year evaluated with a quantitative approach.

Early progressive interstitial fibrosis in human renal allografts.

Early fibrosis has been described in renal allografts and implicated in the progression of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). The precise factors implicated in the initiation and progression of early allograft fibrosis remain uncertain. We studied retrospectively 23 cadaveric renal allograft recipients over a 3-year period, who had paired renal biopsies (Bx) (at implantation and as clinically indicated) within 3 months of transplantation (Tx). Eight of them have progressed over an average period of 3.16 +/- 0.83 years to CAN. Histological evaluation of interstitial fibrosis (IF) relied on point count analysis of Masson's trichrome (MT) staining as well as immunostainable collagens III (iCol III) and IV (iCol IV). The severity of the IF scores was correlated with the clinical, biochemical and histological parameters. The nature and severity of the interstitial inflammatory infiltrate were also evaluated by immunofluorescence. In addition, patients were subdivided into those whose fibrosis progressed (> 50% increase in IF/iCol IlI; Group 1) and non-progressors (< 50% increase in fibrosis score; Group 2) in an attempt to determine discriminatory features. In the whole group, there was a significant increase in the IF score, as estimated by MT staining and iCol III, from implantation to follow-up Bx (p = 0.0027 and p = 0.0088, respectively). The changes in iCol IV were not significant. Further, the increase in interstitial inflammatory infiltrate of total T lymphocytes, and not of macrophages, from implantation (modal category = 2) to follow-up (modal category = 0) was significant (p = 0.0121). The predictive value of such increase was significant (R2 = 0.617, p = 0.03). The donor's age (R2 = 0.892, p = < 0.0001), death from cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (R2 = 0.822, p = 0.047), as well as recipient's body weight (R2 = 0.892, p = 0.001), male gender (R2 = 0.687, p = 0.041) and elevated mean arterial pressure (MAP) (R2 = 0.892, p = < 0.0001) were all significant risk factors for early IF. Delayed graft function (DGF) proved to be a significant predictor of early IF (R2 = 0.822, p = 0.003) and became more significant in the presence of superimposed acute rejection (AR) (p = 0.0001). Proteinuria > 1 g/day (R2 = 0.882, p = 0.004) and hypertriglyceridemia > 2.25 mmol/l (R2 = 0.808, p = < 0.0001) were also associated with early IF. Of the implantation histological parameters, iCol III proved to be a highly significant predictor of early IF (R2 = 0.892, p = < 0.0001). Interestingly, the predictive value of iCol III for graft survival in terms of CAN was significant (Cox p = 0.088). Group 1 progressor patients (n = 10) were all males (p = 0.038) and received their kidneys from donors who died from CVAs in 90% of cases (p = 0.011). They had, compared to non-progressors, a lower cyclosporin A level (p = 0.047), a higher incidence of AR episodes (80% versus 54%), a higher serum creatinine at 10 days post-Tx (p = 0.005), a higher proteinuria (2.07 +/- 3.89 g/l vs 0.96 +/- 0.97 g/l, p = 0.041) and a higher serum triglyceride (2.48 +/- 1.37 mmol/l vs 1.69 +/- 0.81 mmol/l, p = 0.039) level. 8% of Group 1 patients had DGF compared to 30% in Group 2 (p = 0.023). Of note, the modal category of cytotoxic: helper T lymphocytes ratio was greater than 1 in Group 1 (2:1) patients and not in Group 2 (1:1). Implantation histology, and in particular iCol III, is a predictor of early IF in a subgroup of patients with DGF and AR. Additional risk factors include hypertension, proteinuria and hypertriglyceridemia especially in patients receiving kidneys from older donors who died of CVAs.

Role of transforming growth factor-beta1 in the progression of chronic allograft nephropathy.

Chronic allograft nephropathy is the principal cause of late graft loss after the first year of renal transplantation. Transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) is a key fibrogenetic cytokine involved in the fibrosis of a number of chronic diseases of the kidney and other organs, and recently evidence has shown that TGF-beta1 is involved in the pathogenesis of chronic renal allograft dysfunction. Production of TGF-beta1 in these circumstances may be modulated by the intrarenal renin-angiotensin system (angiotensin II induces TGF-beta1 production and secretion by the mesangial cells) and by a direct effect of cyclosporin A, which stimulates the synthesis and expression of TGF-beta1. In a prospective study of 14 renal transplant patients exhibiting chronic graft nephropathy, we demonstrated that treatment with losartan significantly decreased plasma levels of TGF-beta1 by >50%. There was a significant correlation (P=0.04) between the increase in circulating angiotensin II after 2 weeks and the decrease in plasma TGF-beta(1) at the end of the study period, suggesting that the degree of angiotensin II receptor blockade plays a decisive role in the synthesis of TGF-beta1. A significant decrease in circulating endothelin-1 (ET-1) levels also occurred during treatment with losartan, together with a decrease in proteinuria. In a randomized 2x2 crossover study, the effects of losartan and amlodipine on renal haemodynamics and on profibrogenetic cytokines were analysed. Whereas amlodipine increased the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) through an increase in the FF and P(G), losartan slightly decreased the GFR, but with a significant decrease in FF and P(G). With respect to the profibrogenetic cytokines, losartan decreased the plasma levels of TGF-beta1 and ET-1, while amlodipine did not significantly change TGF-beta1 and slightly increased ET-1.

Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II antagonists in renal transplantation: Delaying the progression of chronic allograft nephropathy?

Advances in immunosuppressive therapy have improved the survival of both cadaveric and living donor renal transplants. The improved long-term survival is probably a consequence of these advances and concurrent improvements in the general medical management of the transplant recipients. One area of care that remains controversial in renal transplantation is the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). ACEI and ARB are now commonly used in patients with chronic renal insufficiency, proteinuria and hypertension caused by the disease of their own native kidneys. This article reviews the potential benefits of interrupting the production of angiotensin II (All) or blockade of the AT1 receptor for All in renal transplant recipients. The current hypotheses for the pathophysiology and the cytokine abnormalities in the progression of renal dysfunction include a facilitative role for All. In addition, calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, with the increased generation of transforming growth factor-β, is also affected by the actions of All. It is suggested that ACEI and ARB be used more widely in transplantation patients.

Rethinking chronic allograft nephropathy: the concept of accelerated senescence.

Rethinking chronic allograft nephropathy: the concept of accelerated senescence.