Programmed Death Ligand-1 Inhibitors Research Articles

Comparative Impact of PD-1 and PD-L1 Inhibitors on Advanced Esophageal or Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Programmed death 1 (PD-1) and PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have demonstrated varying effectiveness in treating esophageal or gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment in patients with esophageal or G/GEJ cancer by analyzing the types of medications. Randomized controlled trials comparing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 to control therapy were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) rates, and serious adverse events (SAEs), evaluating the differences in therapy types, including a comparison between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. Eight studies were included in the analysis. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors affected the overall OS rate increment without influencing the PFS rate (HR, 0.837; 95% CI, 0.753–0.929; p = 0.001; HR 0.991; 95% CI, 0.778–1.263; p = 0.942, respectively). Anti-PD-1 was significantly more beneficial for increasing OS and PFS than PD-L1 inhibitors. Anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 use was not significantly associated with SAE development in esophageal or G/GEJ cancer patients. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor use was associated with improved OS and PFS rate increase among PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. Considering response variations to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 usage, more individualized treatments should be introduced in clinical practice.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Single and Double Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based First-Line Treatments for Advanced Driver-Gene Wild-Type Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival for advanced wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) significantly, but few studies compared single ICI (SICI)-based treatments and double ICIs (DICI)-based treatments. We summarized the general efficacy of ICI-related treatments, compared the efficacy and safety of SICI-based [programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) or cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors ± chemotherapy (CT)] and DICI-based (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors+CTLA-4 inhibitors ± chemotherapy) treatments vs. CT in the first-line treatment.MethodsWe included phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including patients with histologically confirmed stage IIIB–IV driver-gene wild-type NSCLC who received first-line ICI-related therapy in at least one arm. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2020. This network meta-analysis was performed in a Bayesian framework using GEMTC and JAGS package in R.3.6.1. The research was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020184534).ResultsTwenty RCTs were involved, including 13,032 patients and 17 treatment regimens. The results showed that ICI-based therapies could provide a pooled median overall survival (mOS) (POS) of 15.79 (95% CI: 14.85–16.73) months, and there were no significant differences in OS, progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and grade 3 or higher adverse events (≥3AEs) between DICI-based treatments (POS: 14.81, 12.11–17.52 months) and SICI-based treatments (POS: 16.17, 14.59–17.74 months) in overall patients. However, DICI-based treatments had significantly prolonged the OS over SICI-based treatments in squamous and PD-L1 <1% subgroups. The ranking of OS benefit by Bayesian surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) spectrum showed that DICI+chemotherapy ranked first for overall population and subgroups including squamous, non-squamous, any level of PD-L1 expression, smoking, male, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) = 0/1, age < 65/≥65 while SICI+CT for low tumor mutation burden (TMB), non-smoking, and female subgroups, and DICI for high TMB subgroups.ConclusionsIn the first-line therapy for advanced wild-type NSCLC, both SICI- and DICI-based treatments could bring significant overall advantages over chemotherapy, with comparable outcomes of efficacy and ≥3AEs. DICI-based treatments were more effective than SICI-based treatments in squamous and PD-L1 <1% subgroups. For most populations, DICI+chemotherapy could be the best choice with a survival benefit, while SICI+chemotherapy has established its position actually.Systematic Review Registration[PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42020184534].

Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 Inhibitors Versus Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Inhibitors in Addition to Chemotherapy for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IntroductionThe addition of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors to first-line chemotherapy (CT) improved the outcomes of advanced NSCLC. Nonetheless, no direct comparison exists between these combination treatments. MethodsWe performed a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of PD-(L)1 inhibitors in combination with first-line CT for advanced NSCLC. ResultsA total of eight randomized clinical trials were included. The addition of a PD-(L)1 inhibitor to CT improved progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate compared with CT alone. The risk of grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related adverse events was slightly higher with the addition of a PD-(L)1 inhibitor to CT as compared with CT alone. A subgroup analysis according to the targeted receptor (PD-1 versus PD-L1) revealed that the addition of a PD-1 inhibitor to CT led to better objective response rate (p = 0.0001), progression-free survival (p = 0.006), and overall survival (p = 0.002) compared with that of a PD-L1 inhibitor. The risk of grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related adverse events was significantly increased with the addition of a PD-L1 inhibitor to CT, but not with the addition of a PD-1 inhibitor. A direct comparison using the meta-regression analysis confirmed the statistical significance of all previous findings. ConclusionsOn the basis of this meta-analysis, the addition of a PD-1 inhibitor to first-line CT revealed statistically significant better outcomes and less additional toxicity compared with that of a PD-L1 inhibitor, as compared with CT alone, in advanced NSCLC, regardless of PD-L1 status.

Cancer cachexia syndrome and clinical outcome in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: results from a prospective, observational study.

BackgroundCancer cachexia syndrome (CCS) is an adverse prognostic factor in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy or surgical procedures. We performed a prospective study to investigate the effect of CCS on treatment outcomes in patients with non-oncogene driven metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing therapy with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors.MethodsPatients were categorized as having cancer cachexia if they had weight loss >5% in the last 6 months prior to immunotherapy (I-O) initiation or any degree of weight loss >2% and body mass index (BMI) <20 kg/m2 or skeletal muscle index at the level of third lumbar vertebra (LSMI) <55 cm2/m2 for males and <39 cm2/m2 for females. LSMI was calculated using computed tomography (CT) scans of the abdomen at the beginning of I-O and every 3 months thereafter.ResultsEighty-three patients were included in the analysis and the prevalence of cancer cachexia at the beginning of I-O was 51.8%. The presence of CCS was associated with inferior response rates to ICIs (P≤0.001) and consisted an independent predictor of increased probability for developing disease progression as best response to treatment, OR =8.11 (95% CI: 2.95–22.40, P≤0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of baseline cancer cachexia consisted an independent predictor for inferior survival, HR =2.52 (95% CI: 1.40–2.55, P=0.002). Reduction of LSMI >5% during treatment did not affect overall survival (OS; P=0.40).ConclusionsCCS is associated with reduced PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor efficacy in NSCLC patients and should constitute an additional stratification factor in future I-O clinical trials. Further research at a translational and molecular level is required to decipher the mechanisms of interrelation of metabolic deregulation and suppression of antitumor immunity.

CheckMate 73L: A Phase 3 Study Comparing Nivolumab Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Durvalumab for Previously Untreated, Locally Advanced Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionThe 5 year survival rate for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) not amenable for definitive resection with historical standard-of-care concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) ranges from 15% to 32%. cCRT primes anti-tumor immunity and also upregulates programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), providing a rationale for combining an immune checkpoint inhibitor with cCRT to improve outcomes. In the PACIFIC trial, consolidation therapy with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) vs. placebo in patients with stage III NSCLC who did not have disease progression after cCRT. CheckMate73L (NCT04026412), a randomized phase 3 study, evaluates the efficacy of nivolumab plus cCRT followed by nivolumab with or without ipilimumab vs. cCRT followed by durvalumab for untreated, stage III NSCLC. Patients and MethodsPatients with untreated, stage III NSCLC will be randomized 1:1:1 to nivolumab plus cCRT followed by nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab (Arm A) or nivolumab alone (Arm B); or cCRT followed by durvalumab (Arm C). Primary endpoints are PFS and OS (Arm A vs. Arm C). Secondary endpoints include additional analyses of PFS and OS (Arm A vs. Arm B; Arm B vs. Arm C), as well as objective response rate, complete response rate, time to response, duration of response, time to death or distant metastases, and safety and tolerability. Recruitment began on August 20, 2019, and the estimated primary completion date is October 17, 2022.

Ocular adverse events in PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors

BackgroundProgrammed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors can cause unique immune-related adverse effects due to non-specific immunological activation. However, less is known about adverse effects of these drugs...

Abstract 1592: Palbociclib enhances anti-PD-L1 therapeutic efficacy in oral squamous cell carcinoma was associated with CXCR4 inactivation

Abstract Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a subtype of HNSCC, which was recognized as a common malignant tumor with high mortality in the world. Oral cancer treatment methods include surgery, radiotherapy and adjuvant therapy, but none of these treatment methods can effectively improve the prognosis of oral cancer. The development of OSCC is driven by abnormal cell cycle regulation and immunosuppressive microenvironment. Palbociclib is an inhibitor of CDK4/6, which can trigger cell cycle arrest in cells. Currently, the development of CDK4/6 inhibitors has achieved certain effects on breast cancer patients. However, whether CDK4/6 inhibitors may be used in other cancers, such as OSCC and other cancers still need further discussion and research. In addition, the immunotherapy of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors has recently been explored on many types of cancers. While current data suggested that PD-L1 inhibitor may only be effectively on patient with PD-L1 molecules expression on tumor tissue. Studies have also pointed out that CDK4/6 inhibitor (palbociclib) treatment can induce PD-L1 expression in many different types of cancer and show potential to enhance the efficacy of PD-L1 inhibitors. C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 was also known to regulate the treatment efficacy via modulating tumor microenvironment (TME). Furthermore, whether CXCR4 inhibition can improve TME and enhance the treatment efficacy of PD-L1 still needs to be investigated. Thus, the goal of this study is to identify whether CDK4/6 can be used to suppress cell proliferation and enhance PD-L1 efficacy via altering TME in OSCC. Here, we used cell viability test, Western blotting, flow cytometry, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and animal experiments to explore the effects of palbociclib combined with PD-L1 inhibitor in OSCC. Our results indicated that palbociclib may suppress cell viability and induce the surface expression of PD-L1 in both human OSCC SAS and mouse OSCC MOC1 cells. Moreover, palbociclib effectively induce extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis (caspase-3, -8, -9, and mitochondria membrane potential) of OSCC cells. The expression of CXCR4 and its related downstream signaling were decreased by palbociclib. Immune suppressive factors, such as IDO, VEGF, TGF-β was also reduced by palbociclib. Smallest tumor size was also found in palbociclib combined PD-L1 inhibitor groups. Palbociclib may not only suppress tumor proliferation, induce apoptosis and downregulated tumor suppressive factors expression which result in the efficacy induction of anti-PD-L1. In sum, we proposed that palbociclib may enhance treatment efficacy of PD-L1 inhibitor through the inhibition of CXCR4 mediated signaling pathway. Citation Format: Chi-Lung Wang, I-Tsang Chiang, Fei-Ting Hsu, Yuan Chang. Palbociclib enhances anti-PD-L1 therapeutic efficacy in oral squamous cell carcinoma was associated with CXCR4 inactivation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1592.

Abstract CT227: A phase 1 multiple ascending dose study to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and preliminary efficacy of KD033 in subjects with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors

Abstract Background: IL-2 and IL-15 signal through the shared IL-2/15 βγ receptor, but unlike IL-2, IL-15 does not expand regulatory T cells (Tregs). In addition, unlike IL-2, IL-15 does not mediate activation-induced cell death and is expected to have an improved therapeutic index compared to IL-2. KD033 is a fusion antibody molecule generated by combining a fully human, high affinity anti-human Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) IgG1 antibody with the human IL-15 receptor alpha (IL15Rα) sushi domain and human IL-15 (IL-15). KD033 (or its mouse cross reactive surrogate molecule, srKD033) has been extensively characterized in multiple in vitro and in vivo nonclinical studies to understand the pharmacology, pharmacokinetic (PK) and toxicology properties. The fusion of anti-PD-L1 antibody to IL-15 significantly increases the maximal-tolerated dose (MTD) of srKD033 in mice compared to free-IL-15. The increased safety and efficacy of PD-L1-targeted IL-15 observed in pre-clinical studies warranted evaluation of KD033 in humans. Methods: This is a phase 1, open-label, multiple ascending dose, multi-center clinical trial being conducted in patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors (NCT04242147). The primary objective is to determine the safety and tolerability and the MTD of KD033. KD033 is administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes every 14 days (i.e., a cycle equals 2 weeks). The starting dose of KD033 is 3 µg/kg, with step-up dosing to 12.5 µg/kg in the first cohort of 3 subjects. After the first cohort, the dose escalation will use a standard 3+3 design with planned doses from 25 µg/kg to 600 µg/kg. The dose escalation phase will be followed by one expansion cohort, which will enroll patients who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor but have either progressed or are refractory to therapy. Secondary objectives include characterization of PK and immunogenicity, evaluation of immune correlates that will potentially differentiate the impact of KD033 versus monotherapy as well as investigate IL-15 biology and determine best overall response and duration of response. (NCT04242147) Citation Format: Jason J. Luke, Anthony J. Olszanski, Igor Puzanov, Dan Lu, Adrian Hackett, Stella Martomo, Jeegar Patel, Olivier Schueller, Alessandro Mora, Miranda L. Schlitt, Linghui Li. A phase 1 multiple ascending dose study to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and preliminary efficacy of KD033 in subjects with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT227.

CD137 and PD-L1 targeting with immunovirotherapy induces a potent and durable antitumor immune response in glioblastoma models

BackgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating primary brain tumor with a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and treatment with oncolytic viruses (OVs) has emerged as a promising strategy for these tumors. Our...

CX-072 (pacmilimab), a Probody® PD-L1 inhibitor, in advanced or recurrent solid tumors (PROCLAIM-CX-072): an open-label dose-finding and first-in-human study

BackgroundProbody® therapeutics are antibody prodrugs that are activated in the tumor microenvironment by tumor-associated proteases, thereby restricting the activity to the tumor microenvironment and minimizing ‘off-tumor’ toxicity. We report dose-escalation...

CX-072 (pacmilimab), a Probody PD-L1 inhibitor, in combination with ipilimumab in patients with advanced solid tumors (PROCLAIM-CX-072): a first-in-human, dose-finding study

BackgroundProbody® therapeutics are antibody prodrugs designed to be activated by tumor-associated proteases. This conditional activation restricts antibody binding to the tumor microenvironment, thereby minimizing ‘off-tumor’ toxicity. Here, we report the...

Current and future drug combination strategies based on programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer.

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have made breakthroughs in the field of lung cancer and have become a focal point for research. Programmed death-1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor monotherapy was the first to break the treatment pattern for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, owing to the limited benefit of ICI monotherapy at the population level and its hyper-progressive phenomenon, it may not meet clinical needs. To expand the beneficial range of immunotherapy and improve its efficacy, several research strategies have adopted the use of combination immunotherapy. At present, multiple strategies, such as PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibitors, and radiotherapy, as well as combined treatment with new target drugs, have been evaluated for clinical practice. To further understand the current status and future development direction of immunotherapy, herein, we review the recent progress of ICI combination therapies for NSCLC.

PD-L1 Dysregulation in COVID-19 Patients.

The COVID-19 pandemic has reached direct and indirect medical and social consequences with a subset of patients who rapidly worsen and die from severe-critical manifestations. As a result, there is still an urgent need to identify prognostic biomarkers and effective therapeutic approaches. Severe-critical manifestations of COVID-19 are caused by a dysregulated immune response. Immune checkpoint molecules such as Programmed death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) play an important role in regulating the host immune response and several lines of evidence underly the role of PD-1 modulation in COVID-19. Here, by analyzing blood sample collection from both hospitalized COVID-19 patients and healthy donors, as well as levels of PD-L1 RNA expression in a variety of model systems of SARS-CoV-2, including in vitro tissue cultures, ex-vivo infections of primary epithelial cells and biological samples obtained from tissue biopsies and blood sample collection of COVID-19 and healthy individuals, we demonstrate that serum levels of PD-L1 have a prognostic role in COVID-19 patients and that PD-L1 dysregulation is associated to COVID-19 pathogenesis. Specifically, PD-L1 upregulation is induced by SARS-CoV-2 in infected epithelial cells and is dysregulated in several types of immune cells of COVID-19 patients including monocytes, neutrophils, gamma delta T cells and CD4+ T cells. These results have clinical significance since highlighted the potential role of PD-1/PD-L1 axis in COVID-19, suggest a prognostic role of PD-L1 and provide a further rationale to implement novel clinical studies in COVID-19 patients with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

Adverse Events Induced by PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors: A Real-World Single-Centre Experience with a Management-Based Approach.

AimTo assess the efficacy and tolerance of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and the impact of a standardised management-based protocol in a real-world setting.Patients and MethodsData from patients who had received anti-PD-(L)1 were collected from our pharmacy database. Clinical response and toxicity were assessed using RECIST criteria and CTCAE version 5.0, respectively. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method. Potential prognostic factors were identified using Cox’s model.ResultsA total of 196 patients and 201 lines of treatment were included (median age: 66 (range: 38–89) years). Types of cancer included non-small cell lung cancer (73%), transitional cell carcinoma (10%), renal cell carcinoma (6%), small cell lung cancer (5%), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (4%) and classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma (1%). Twenty-five (12%) patients had pre-existing autoimmune conditions. Our standardised management-based protocol included 129 (64%) patients. Objective response rate was 29%, median OS was 10 months (IQR: 7–15) and median PFS was 5 months (IQR: 1–22). Patients with an abnormal baseline complete blood count had a worse OS (HR=2.48 [95% CI: 1.24–4.96]; p=0.0103). Thirty-three (16%) patients experienced severe (grade 3 or 4) immune-related adverse event (irAE). There were three (1%) irAE-related deaths. AEs resolved faster when patients were assessed by an internist before anti-PD-(L)1 initiation (p=0.0205).ConclusionPD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are effective and safe in a real-world setting. Implementation of a standardised management-based protocol with internal medicine specialists is an effective way to optimise irAE management.

The clinical impact of three validated PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays as a prognostic factor in small cell lung cancer.

BackgroundEvidence of the clinical impact of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is scarce and conflicting, even though atezolizumab became the first PD-L1 inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in recent years for the initial treatment of extensive-stage (ES)-SCLC.MethodsWe investigated PD-L1 expression in SCLC tumors using the three validated PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays (SP263, SP142, and 22C3) and assessed the correlation between PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological factors to determine the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression. The three PD-L1 IHC analyses were prospectively used to assess tumor samples of patients with SCLC at diagnosis.ResultsOf the total of 59 patients, 47 patients received the active treatment beyond platinum-based chemotherapy at our institution. PD-L1 expression was positive in 39.0% with SP263, 37.3% with SP142, and 22.0% with 22C3. In a univariate analysis, the positive result of at least one of the three PD-L1 assays and the positive result of the SP142 assay were associated with longer overall survival (OS). A multivariable analysis confirmed that performance status, stage, and the SP142 assay were independent predictors of OS. In subgroup analysis, these results revealed more significant prognostic factors in ES than in limited-stage (LS). In patients with SCLC, especially those with ES, the expression of the SP142 assay is a significant independent prognostic factor.ConclusionsAlthough these results need to be further validated in larger cohorts, this information will benefit clinicians and patients in determining the immunotherapy for patients with ES-SCLC.

One dimensional magneto-optical nanocomplex from silver nanoclusters and magnetite nanorods containing ordered mesocages for sensitive detection of PD-L1

Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a typical immune checkpoint protein, whose up-regulation on the membrane of different tumor cells inhibits the immune response of T cells and leads to the escape of tumor cells. In this work, we designed a facile and highly specific surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor to detect PD-L1 in human plasma based on magnetite nanorods containing ordered mesocages (MNOM) and silver nanoclusters (AgNCs). Magneto-optical nanocomplex MNOM@AgNCs with superior magneto-optical properties and high signal-to-noise ratio were fabricated to improve the detection sensitivity owing to the high specific surface area of MNOM and excellent localized SPR of AgNCs. The PD-L1 Antibody on the surface of gold chip and the PD-L1 aptamer on MNOM@AgNCs could realize dual selective recognition of PD-L1, providing the specificity of the sensor and reducing non-specific binding. The SPR sensor showed a good linear range of PD-L1 from 10 ng/mL to 300 ng/mL with the detection limit of 3.29 ng/mL. The practical performance of this immunosensing platform had been successfully verified by clinical samples which included healthy donors and cancer patients. Based on the analysis, the developed immunosensor provided a new strategy for point-of-care detection of PD-L1 and could be used as clinical companion diagnosis of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy.

Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of o-(Biphenyl-3-ylmethoxy)nitrophenyl Derivatives as PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors with Potent Anticancer Efficacy In Vivo.

Two series of novel o-(biphenyl-3-ylmethoxy)nitrophenyl compounds (A1-31 and B1-17) were designed as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. All compounds showed significant inhibitory activity with IC50 values ranging from 2.7 to 87.4 nM except compound A17, and compound B2 displayed the best activity. Further experiments showed that B2 bound to the PD-L1 protein without obvious toxicity in Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cells. Furthermore, B2 significantly promoted interferon-gamma secretion in a dose-dependent manner in vitro and in vivo. Especially, B2 exhibited potent in vivo anticancer efficacy in an LLC-bearing allograft mouse model at a low dose of 5 mg/kg, which was more active than BMS-1018 (tumor growth inhibition rate: 48.5% vs 17.8%). A panel of immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry assays demonstrated that B2 effectively counteracted PD-1-induced immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment, thereby triggering antitumor immunity. These results indicate that B2 is a promising PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor worthy of further development.

Trial in progress: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial of trilaciclib versus placebo in patients receiving first- or second-line gemcitabine and carboplatin for locally advanced unresectable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (PRESERVE 2).

TPS1107 Background: Trilaciclib is an intravenous (IV), highly potent and selective, reversible cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor that protects hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells during chemotherapy (myeloprotection) and may directly enhance antitumor immunity (anticancer efficacy). In a randomized phase 2 trial of trilaciclib administered prior to gemcitabine and carboplatin (GC) versus GC alone in advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), although the primary endpoint of myeloprotection was not met, the addition of trilaciclib resulted in a substantial improvement in median overall survival (OS; 19.8 months with trilaciclib vs 12.6 months with placebo, hazard ratio [95% CI] = 0.37 [0.21–0.63]; O’Shaughnessy et al. SABCS 2020 [PD1-06]). Clinically meaningful improvements in OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were also observed in both programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)–positive and –negative subsets. Methods: The PRESERVE 2 trial (EudraCT: 2020-004930-39) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy of trilaciclib administered prior to GC in patients with mTNBC. Two mTNBC patient populations will be studied and analyzed separately: cohort 1 (N = 170) will evaluate first-line, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor–naïve patients with ≥6 months between completion of last curative treatment and first recurrence; cohort 2 (N = 80) will evaluate second-line PD-L1–positive patients following ≥4 months of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy in the advanced setting. Key eligibility criteria for both cohorts include age ≥18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1, and available tumor tissue. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to trilaciclib 240 mg/m2 or placebo prior to gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the curve 2 IV on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. Stratification factors (cohort 1 only) include tumor PD-L1 status by Ventana SP-142 IVD assay, disease-free interval, and country. Study treatment will continue until progressive disease per RECIST v1.1, unacceptable toxicity, or investigator/patient decision, after which, patients will be followed every 3 months for survival. Up to 80 patients will be consented for optional paired baseline and on-treatment biopsies. Archival tissue and serial peripheral blood will be collected from all patients. The primary endpoint is OS, and the key secondary endpoint is time to confirmed deterioration in fatigue. Other secondary endpoints include PFS, myeloprotection, and safety/tolerability. Exploratory endpoints will assess pharmacodynamic parameters, including those related to immune-based mechanisms, and efficacy by CDK4/6-dependence signatures. Study enrollment is open. Clinical trial information: 2020-004930-39 .

Intratumoral CD39+CD8+ T Cells Predict Response to Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 or Programmed Death Ligand-1 Blockade in Patients With NSCLC

IntroductionProgrammed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade is currently widely used in the treatment of metastatic NSCLC. Despite available biomarker stratification, clinical responses vary. Thus, the search for novel biomarkers with improved response prediction is ongoing. Previously, using mass cytometry or cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF), our group demonstrated that CD39+CD8+ immune cells represent tumor antigen-specific, cytotoxic T cells in treatment-naive NSCLC. We hypothesized that accurate quantitation of this T cell subset would predict immunotherapy outcome. MethodsTo translate this to a clinical setting, the present study compared CyTOF data with a range of clinically relevant methods, including conventional immunohistochemistry (IHC), multiplex IHC or immunofluorescence (mIHC), and gene expression assay by NanoString. ResultsQuantification using mIHC but not conventional IHC or NanoString correlated with the CyTOF results. The specificity and sensitivity of mIHC were then evaluated in a separate retrospective NSCLC cohort. CD39+CD8+ T cell proportion, as determined by mIHC, successfully stratified responders and nonresponders to PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (objective response rate of 63.6%, compared with 0% for the negative group). This predictive capability was independent from other confounding factors, such as total CD8+ T cell proportion, CD39+ lymphocyte proportion, PD-L1 positivity, EGFR mutation status, and other clinicopathologic parameters. ConclusionsOur results suggest that the mIHC platform is a clinically relevant method to evaluate CD39+CD8+ T cell proportion and that this marker can serve as a potential biomarker that predicts response to PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade in patients with NSCLC. Further validation in additional NSCLC cohorts is warranted.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy/bevacizumab therapy for patients with advanced lung cancer and heavily treated with EGFR mutation: a retrospective analysis.

BackgroundEGFR-mutated lung cancer poorly responded to anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monotherapy. Whether patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer can benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy combined with other drugs remains controversial. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of the PD-1 inhibitor combined with other drugs (chemotherapy and/or bevacizumab) in patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer, who have progressed on EGFR–TKI treatment to determine the activity of the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy combined with chemotherapy or/and bevacizumab therapy in heavily treated patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer.MethodsWe identified 56 patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone or combined with the chemotherapy/bevacizumab therapy. The objective response rates were assessed using RECIST v1.1. Adverse events (AEs) were graded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study was approved by the Academic Ethics Committee of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital. (NO. 2019 160), and individual consent for this retrospective analysis was waived.ResultsObjective responses were observed in 6 of 56 (10.7%) patients, and the disease control rate was 53.6% (30/56). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.33 months with 95% CI of 1.58–5.08 months. No patient achieved a complete response. All six patients that achieved PR were treated with the PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy or bevacizumab therapy. Three of the six patients who achieved PR were treated with radiotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor-based therapy. Patients treated with the PD-1 inhibitor-based therapy as second-line therapy showed relatively longer PFS and higher objective response rates than those treated with PD-1 inhibitor-based therapy as third- or late-line therapy (PFS: 5.50 vs. 3.27 months, P=0.301; objective response rates: 25.0% vs. 6.82%, P=0.071). No additional AE profile was observed.ConclusionsThe PD-1 inhibitor combined with the chemotherapy/bevacizumab therapy showed acceptable toxicity profile and moderate efficacy on heavily treated advanced EGFR-mutated lung cancer after the exhaustion of target therapy.