Programmed Cell Death-1 Inhibitor Research Articles

Prognostic value of esophageal cancer immune prognostic index in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with anti-programmed cell death-1 therapy.

This study aimed to determine whether the immune prognostic index (ECIPI), based on hemoglobin (Hb) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), could predict the prognosis in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) receiving programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor treatment. Advanced ESCC patients who had been treated with PD-1 inhibitors from Jan 2016 to Oct 2021 were included. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to analyze progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The overall response rate (ORR) was the percentage of complete and partial responses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used for estimating hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Patients were grouped by ECIPI (good: Hb > 105 g/L and NLR ≤ 4.3; intermediate: Hb ≤ 105 g/L and NLR ≤ 4.3, or Hb > 105 g/L and NLR < 4.3; poor: Hb ≤ 105 g/L and NLR > 4.3). Variables for the multivariate model were selected if the p-value was below 0.05 in the univariate analysis. All statistical comparisons were two-way, and a p-value below 0.05 was set as statistical significance. Totally, of 123 ESCC patients with stage III or IV were included in the study. Efficacy evaluation showed that patients with pretreatment ECIPI good had the best ORR compared with those with ECIPI intermediate and ECIPI poor (53% vs. 22% vs. 8%, p< 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that ECIPI was an independent influential factor for PFS (p= 0.004) and OS (p< 0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that patients with ECIPI good had the longest PFS (median: 11.6 vs. 3.5 vs. 1.7months, p< 0.0001) and OS (median: 23.6 vs. 16.7 vs. 4.0months, p< 0.0001) compared with those with ECIPI intermediate and ECIPI poor. Subgroup analysis indicated that ECIPI good was associated with improved PFS and OS in patients with ECOG 0-1, PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy, first-line treatment, and smoke (all p< 0.05). Pretreatment ECIPI was associated with the prognosis in advanced ESCC patients with anti-PD-1 therapy, suggesting that ECIPI may be a useful tool to identify patients likely sensitive to PD-1 inhibitors.

Correlation and efficacy of TACE combined with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus based on immunological features.

Although the appearance of portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is significantly associated with unfavorable prognosis, there is insufficient evidence to confirm the efficacy and safety of the triple combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), lenvatinib, and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and PVTT. Furthermore, it remains unclear which patient type can obtain the best survival benefit from this combination therapy. The data of 160 patients with HCC and PVTT treated with TACE combined with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor (TACE+LEN + PD-1 group) or TACE combined with lenvatinib (TACE+LEN group) were retrospectively collected and analyzed. To estimate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy for patients with advanced HCC, tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), biochemical indices, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed in this study. More importantly, tumor immune-related cytokines were used to identify biomarkers predicting the therapeutic response of combination therapy. TACE+LEN + PD-1 was superior to TACE+LEN in OS (23.5 vs. 18.3 months, p=0.0002) and PFS (7.5 vs. 4.3 months, p < 0.0001). Moreover, TACE+LEN + PD-1 achieved more preferable benefits with respect to disease control rate (80.00% vs. 56.67%) and objective response rate (38.57% vs. 24.45%) compared with TACE+LEN in patients with HCC and PVTT (p=0.025). Multivariate analysis showed that Child-Pugh grade, PVTT classification, treatment option, and interleukin (IL)-6, IL-17, interferon (IFN)-α, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels were independent factors related to OS, whereas PVTT classification, treatment option, and IL-6 and IFN-α levels were independent factors related to PFS. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis illustrated that the inflammatory cytokines VEGF, IL-6, IL-17, and IFN-α might be novel biomarkers for predicting the survival prognosis of patients with advanced HCC and PVTT treated with TACE+LEN + PD-1. The safety in the combination group was acceptable. Compared with TACE+LEN, the triple combination treatment of TACE+LEN + PD-1 has more promising clinical outcomes and acceptable safety in patients with HCC and PVTT. Child-Pugh grade, PVTT classification, and IL-6, IL-17, IFN-α, and VEGF levels are independent prognostic factors for survival time.

Structure-based small inhibitors search combined with molecular dynamics driven energies for human programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) protein

Human immune system is specialized in distinguishing normal cells from foreign particles mainly through proteins expressed on immune cells called ‘checkpoints’. Immune checkpoints work as a switch to activate and deactivate immune responses. T cells express one of the immune checkpoint, human programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), which normally operates as an off-switch function to protect the normal cell from T-cell attack. Binding of PD-1 to its ligand, the programmed cell death ligand (PD-L1/2) expressed on myeloid/cancer cells, induce downstream inhibitory signals, leading to tumor immune evasion. Targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 can boost the immune response against cancer cells. To design novel small molecule inhibitors for the PD-1, in silico structure-based screening on pharmacophoric points and molecular docking were performed. Based on the docking score and significant binding interaction with the crucial residues of PD-1 (Thr59, Glu61, Ser62, Glu84, Arg86 and Ala132), compounds were selected from the ZINC20 database, and their dynamic behavior and conformational stability were examined through molecular dynamic simulations. Besides, the Molecular Mechanics/Generalized Born Surface Area (MM/GBSA) method was used to calculate the binding strength of each selected inhibitor complexed with PD-1. The binding energy calculations revealed that these selected inhibitors show a considerable affinity for PD-1. The selected novel inhibitors exhibit excellent drug-like and pharmacokinetic properties (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity). In conclusion, the identified novel compounds (ZINC1443480030, ZINC1002854123, ZINC988238128, ZINC1481242350, ZINC1001739421, ZINC1220816434 and ZINC1167786692) from the current study can be validated in-vitro as potential PD-1 inhibitors and for discovery of novel drugs against PD-1 in the future. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma

Efficacy and Safety of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Alone or Combination with Programmed Death-1 Inhibitors in Treating of Hepatitis C-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) combined with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor is a potential treatment modality for patients with HCV-related unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). The participants of the present work included the patients having HCV-related uHCC who were treated with TKI monotherapy (TKI group) or TKI combined with PD-1 inhibitors therapy (combination group) in our center between June 2018 and June 2021. In addition, the patients were classified into RNA-positive and RNA-negative groups based on whether or not the baseline HCV RNA was detectable. The overall survival (OS) was used as the primary efficacy endpoint, while progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were used as secondary endpoints. The adverse events were recorded and evaluated. Among the 67 patients contained this work, 43 patients were classified into the TKI group, while 24 patients formed the combination group. In relative to the TKI group, the combination group presented notably better median OS (21 months vs 13 months, p = 0.043) and median PFS (8 months vs 5 months, p = 0.005). No evident differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the DCR (58.1% vs 79.2%, p = 0.080), ORR (13.9% vs 25.0%, p = 0.425) and the incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events (34.8% vs 33.3%, p = 1.000). In addition, there existed no obvious difference between the RNA-positive group and RNA-negative group in terms of median OS (14 months vs 19 months, p = 0.578) and median PFS (4 months vs 6 months, p = 0.238). The patients having HCV-related uHCC after being treated with the TKI and PD-1 inhibitor combination therapy exhibited a better prognosis and manageable toxicity compared to the patients who underwent TKI monotherapy.

Risk of diabetes mellitus among users of immune checkpoint inhibitors: A population-based cohort study.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly established cancer therapeutics, but they are associated with new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM). Such risks have not been adequately quantified, and between-class and -sex differences remain unexplored. This was a prospective cohort study of cancer patients receiving any ICI in Hong Kong between 2013 and 2021. Patients with known DM were excluded. Due to few patients using other ICIs, only programmed cell death 1 inhibitors (PD-1i) and programmed death ligand 1 inhibitors (PD-L1i) were compared, alongside between-sex comparison. When comparing PD-1i against PD-L1i, patients with the use of other ICIs or both PD-1i and PD-L1 were further excluded. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to minimize between-group covariate imbalances. Altogether, 3375 patients were analyzed (65.2% males, median age 62.2 [interquartile range 53.8-69.5] years old). Over a median follow-up of 1.0 [0.4-2.4] years, new-onset DM occurred in 457 patients (13.5%), with a 3-year risk of 14.5% [95% confidence interval 13.3%, 15.8%]. IPTW achieve acceptable covariate balance between sexes, and between PD-1i (N=622) and PD-L1i (N=2426) users. Males had significantly higher risk of new-onset DM (hazard ratio 1.35 [1.09, 1.67], p=0.006), while PD-1i and PD-L1i users did not have significantly different risks (hazard ratio vs PD-L1i 0.81 [0.59, 1.11], p=0.182). These were consistent in those with at least 1 year of follow-up, and on competing risk regression. Users of ICI may have a substantial risk of new-onset DM, which may be higher in males but did not differ between PD-1i and PD-L1i.

PD-1 inhibitor plus anlotinib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a real-world study.

Management and treatment of terminal metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains heavily debated. We sought to investigate the efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor plus anlotinib as a potential solution for terminal mCRPC and further evaluate the association of genomic characteristics with efficacy outcomes. We conducted a retrospective real-world study of 25 mCRPC patients who received PD-1 inhibitor plus anlotinib after the progression to standard treatments. The clinical information was extracted from the electronic medical records and 22 patients had targeted circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing. Statistical analysis showed that 6 (24.0%) patients experienced prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and 11 (44.0%) patients experienced PSA reduction. The relationship between ctDNA findings and outcomes was also analyzed. DNA-damage repair (DDR) pathways and homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway defects indicated a comparatively longer PSA-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS; 2.5 months vs 1.2 months, P = 0.027; 3.3 months vs 1.2 months, P = 0.017; respectively). This study introduces the PD-1 inhibitor plus anlotinib as a late-line therapeutic strategy for terminal mCRPC. PD-1 inhibitor plus anlotinib may be a new treatment choice for terminal mCRPC patients with DDR or HRR pathway defects and requires further investigation.

The introduction of LAG-3 checkpoint blockade in melanoma: immunotherapy landscape beyond PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition.

Despite major advances with immunotherapy and targeted therapy in the past decade, metastatic melanoma continues to be a deadly disease for close to half of all patients. Over the past decade, advancement in immune profiling and a deeper understanding of the immune tumor microenvironment (TME) have enabled the development of novel approaches targeting and a multitude of targets being investigated for the immunotherapy of melanoma. However, to date, immune checkpoint blockade has remained the most successful with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, alone or in combination, yielding the most robust and durable clinical outcome in patients with metastatic melanoma. The highest rate of durable responses is achieved with the combination with PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition, and is effective in a variety of settings including brain metastases; however, it comes at the expense of a multitude of life-threatening toxicities occurring in up to 60% of patients. This has also established melanoma as the forefront of immuno-oncology (IO) drug development, and the search for novel checkpoints has been ongoing with multiple relevant targets including T-cell immunoglobulin and mucinodomain containing-3 (TIM-3), LAG-3, V-domain immunoglobulin suppressor T-cell activation (VISTA), T-cell immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) domain (TIGIT), among others. Lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3), which is a co-inhibitory receptor on T cells that suppress their activation, has revolutionized immunomodulation in melanoma. The 'game changing' results from the RELATIVITY-047 trial validated LAG-3 blockade as a relevant biological target and established it as the third clinically relevant immune checkpoint. Importantly, LAG-3 inhibition in combination with PD-1 inhibition offered impressive efficacy with modest increases in toxicity over single agent PD-1 inhibitor and has been U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved for the first-line therapy of patients with metastatic melanoma. The efficacy of this combination in patients with untreated brain or leptomeningeal metastases or with rare melanoma types, such as uveal melanoma, remains to be established. The challenge remains to elucidate specific mechanisms of response and resistance to LAG-3 blockade and to extend its benefits to other malignancies. Ongoing trials are studying the combination of LAG-3 antibodies with PD-1 inhibitors in multiple cancers and settings. The low toxicity of the combination may also allow for further layering of additional therapeutic approaches such as chemotherapy, oncolytic viruses, cellular therapies, and possibly novel cytokines, among others.

High PD-L2 Predicts Early Recurrence of ER-Positive Breast Cancer.

T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity is suppressed when programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) is bound by PD-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1) or PD-L2. Although PD-1 inhibitors have been approved for triple-negative breast cancer, the lower response rates of 25%-30% in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer will require markers to identify likely responders. The focus of this study was to evaluate whether PD-L2, which has higher affinity than PD-L1 for PD-1, is a predictor of early recurrence in ER+ breast cancer. PD-L2 protein levels in cancer cells and stromal cells of therapy-naive, localized or locoregional ER+ breast cancers were measured retrospectively by quantitative immunofluorescence histocytometry and correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) in the main study cohort (n = 684) and in an independent validation cohort (n = 273). All patients subsequently received standard-of-care adjuvant therapy without immune checkpoint inhibitors. Univariate analysis of the main cohort revealed that high PD-L2 expression in cancer cells was associated with shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.6; P = .001), which was validated in an independent cohort (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.8; P = .026) and remained independently predictive after multivariable adjustment for common clinicopathological variables (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.9; P < .001). Subanalysis of the ER+ breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 197) revealed that high PD-L2 levels in cancer cells associated with short PFS in univariate (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.4; P = .003) and multivariable analyses (HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.9 to 6.2; P < .001). Up to one third of treatment-naive ER+ breast tumors expressed high PD-L2 levels, which independently predicted poor clinical outcome, with evidence of further elevated risk of progression in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Collectively, these data warrant studies to gain a deeper understanding of PD-L2 in the progression of ER+ breast cancer and may provide rationale for immune checkpoint blockade for this patient group.

Neoadjuvant PD-1 Inhibitor Plus Apatinib and Chemotherapy Versus Apatinib Plus Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Cohort Study.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus apatinib and chemotherapy (PAC) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). Seventy-three patients with resectable LAGC were enrolled and named the PAC group (n=39) or apatinib plus chemotherapy (AC) group (n=34) based on the treatment they chose. Neoadjuvant therapy was administered in a 21-day cycle for 3 consecutive cycles, after which surgery was performed. The PAC group exhibited a higher objective response rate than the AC group (74.4% vs. 58.8%, P=0.159). Moreover, the PAC group showed a numerically better response profile than the AC group (P=0.081). Strikingly, progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.019) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.049) were prolonged, whereas disease-free survival (DFS) tended to be longer in the PAC group than in the AC group (P=0.056). Briefly, the 3-year PFS, DFS, and OS rates were 76.1%, 76.1%, and 86.7% in the PAC group and 46.9%, 49.9%, and 70.3% in the AC group, respectively. Furthermore, PAC (vs. AC) treatment (hazard ratio=0.286, P=0.034) was independently associated with prolonged PFS in multivariate Cox regression analyses. The incidence of adverse events did not differ between the two groups (all P>0.05), where leukopenia, anemia, hypertension, and other adverse events were commonly observed in the PAC group. Neoadjuvant PAC therapy may achieve a preferable pathological response, delayed progression, and prolonged survival compared to AC therapy with a similar safety profile in patients with LAGC; however, further validation is warranted.

The risks of hematological toxicities of nivolumab in cancer patients: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.

Nivolumab is the human programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)-blocking antibody showing significant effect in many refractory cancers. However, little is known about its risks of hematological toxicities, rare but clinically serious and potentially life-threatening adverse events. We want to explore whether nivolumab can increase the risks of hematological toxicities compared with other immunotherapy or chemotherapy drugs. The databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of science, and CNKI were searched. We used the medical subject heading terms "Nivolumab" plus keyword "Nivolumab" to search studies published from August 1990 to October 2021. For the included articles, we calculated the relative risks and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risks of anemia, neutropenia, and leukopenia in patients treated with nivolumab versus control drugs. Five original articles on the nivolumab trials were identified with 2399 patients enrolled in this meta-analysis. The relative risks of anemia, neutropenia, and leukopenia were 0.343 (95% CI: 0.177-0.663; P = .001), 0.020 (95% CI: 0.008-0.053; P = .000), and 0.054 (95% CI: 0.015-0.191; P = .000), respectively. The PD-1 inhibitor-nivolumab did not increase the risk of anemia, neutropenia and leukopenia. It may enhance awareness about lower risks of hematological toxicities when choosing nivolumab as PD-1 inhibitor among clinicians.

TKI or TKI combined with PD-1 inhibitors as second-line treatment for HCC patients after sorafenib failure.

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in combination with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors become the potential treatment modality for patients undergoing unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in the first-line setting. However, the efficacy and safety of this combination regimen in patients after sorafenib failure remains unclear. Methods: Participants in this study included patients with uHCC after sorafenib failure who received TKI monotherapy (TKI group) or TKI combined with PD-1 inhibitors therapy (combination group) in our center from July 2018 to July 2021. The overall survival (OS) was used to be the primary efficacy endpoint, while progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were applied to be secondary endpoints. In addition, the adverse events are recorded and evaluated. Results: Among the 92 patients contained in this work, 50 patients were categorized into the TKI group, while 42 patients were in the combination group. There existed no evident differences between the two groups concerning the ORR (8.0% vs. 9.5%, p = 1.000). However, the DCR in the combined group was better in relative to that in the TKI group (71.4% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.037). In comparison with the TKI group, it was found that the combination group presented notably better median PFS (8.1 months vs. 4.7months, p = 0.005) and median OS (21.9months vs. 16.6months, p = 0.042). According to multivariate analysis, PFS (HR 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.8, p = 0.005) and OS (HR 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-1.0, p = 0.051) were improved in the combination group in relative to the TKI group after the adjustment for some risk factors. Additionally, the incidence rates of grade ≥1 adverse event in the TKI group and the combination group were 96.0% and 97.6%, respectively. The most normal adverse event in the TKI group was neutropenia (n = 24,48.0%) and the combination group was hypoalbuminemia (n = 23,54.8%). All of these adverse events improved after symptomatic treatment, and no new toxic events were found to occur. Conclusion: TKI combined with PD-1 inhibitors showed better prognosis with manageable toxicity in uHCC patients after sorafenib failure compared with TKI monotherapy.

IMAGENE trial: multicenter, proof-of-concept, phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of niraparib with PD-1 inhibitor in solid cancer patients with homologous recombination repair genes mutation

Previous clinical trials have demonstrated the potential efficacy of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) in patients with cancer involving homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene-mutation. Moreover, HRR gene-mutated cancers are effectively treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with the increase in tumor mutation burden. We have proposed to conduct a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial (IMAGENE trial) for evaluating the efficacy and safety of niraparib (PARPi) plus programmed cell death-1 inhibitor combination therapy in patients with HRR gene-mutated cancers who are refractory to ICIs therapy using a next generation sequencing-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and tumor tissue analysis. Key eligibility criteria for this trial includes HRR gene-mutated tumor determined by any cancer gene tests; progression after previous ICI treatment; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ≤ 1. The primary endpoint is the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) in all patients. The secondary endpoints include the confirmed ORR in patients with HRR gene-mutation of ctDNA using the Caris Assure (CARIS, USA). The target sample size of the IMAGENE trial is 57 patients. Biomarker analyses will be performed in parallel using the Caris Assure, proteome analysis, and T cell repertoire analysis to reveal tumor immunosurveillance in peripheral blood. Our trial aims to confirm the clinical benefit of PARPi plus ICI combination therapy in ICI-resistant patients. Furthermore, through translational research, our trial will shed light on which patients would benefit from the targeted combination therapy for patients with HRR gene-mutated tumor even after the failure of ICIs. The IMAGENE trial: jRCT, Clinical trial no.: jRCT2051210120, Registered date: November 9, 2021.

Combining PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy is a good strategy for the treatment of extensive small cell lung cancer: A retrospective analysis of clinical studies.

To provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Clinicaltrials and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched to extract RCTs concerning the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of ES-SCLC from the time of database inception to October 31, 2022. The literature was independently selected, information was extracted and the risk of bias of the RCTs was evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Stata14.0 was used for the meta-analysis. Six studies involving 2,600 patients were included in the analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly improved the OS (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.66-0.80; P<0.0001), prolonged PFS (HR: 0.66,95% CI: 0.55-0.79; P<0.0001) and did not increase overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.97-1.09; P=0.330) in ES-SCLC patients compared with chemotherapy alone. The subgroup analysis found that patients with negative PD-L1 expression (< 1%) benefited in OS, whereas patients with positive PD-L1 expression (≥1%) had no statistically significant difference in OS. There was a statistically significant difference in PFS between PD-L1-negative (< 1%) and PD-L1-positive (≥1%) patients. The addition of a PD-1 inhibitor or PD-L1 inhibitor to the chemotherapy regimen can improve OS and prolong PFS in patients with ES-SCLC. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combination chemotherapy significantly improves PFS and OS in ES-SCLC patients without increasing the overall incidence of TRAEs.

Efficacy and safety comparison of PD-1 inhibitors vs. PD-L1 inhibitors in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Evidence from clinical research and meta-analyses have suggested that programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy could achieve a significant survival benefit for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients. However clinical researches concerned about the comparation between the PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors were relatively lacking. We collected the data of ES-SCLC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors or PD-L1 inhibitors. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoint included adverse events (AEs). The data of 221 ES-SCLC patients treated with PD-1 (n=146) or PD-L1 inhibitors (n=75) between February 2017 and June 2020 were retrospectively collected. The median OS (mOS) and median PFS (mPFS) were 19.07 and 8.27 months, respectively, in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. In the PD-L1 group, mOS has not been reached, and mPFS was 7.95 months. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in OS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.472; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.847-2.220; P=0.198] and PFS (HR, 0.816; 95% CI, 0.577-1.155; P=0.251). The rates of patients showed AEs of any grade treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 were 67.12% and 64.00%, with no significant difference (P=0.642, χ2=0.216), ≥3 grade AEs occurred in 42 (28.76%) and 16 (21.33%) patients treated with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors separately, also no significant difference (P=0.234, χ2=1.415) was observed. According to subgroup analysis, camrelizumab revealed a longer mPFS (15.17 months) compared with other immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors revealed comparable efficacy in ES-SCLC patients with brain metastases, with no significant differences in OS (HR, 1.505; 95% CI, 0.684-3.311; P=0.309) and PFS (HR, 0.649; 95% CI, 0.356-1.182; P=0.157). PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors might achieved comparable survival benefit and safety in ES-SCLC patients. A longer PFS was observed in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors in the first-line treatment, and the PD-1 inhibitor camrelizumab might have achieved a better PFS compared with other ICIs.

Impact of Corticosteroids for IrAEs on the Clinical Outcome of Immunotherapy in Patients With NSCLC.

The impact of corticosteroids for the treatment of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) on the antitumor effect of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor is unclear. A total of 172 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with PD-1 inhibitors were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into four groups: those who did not develop irAEs [1] and those who developed irAE and were either not treated with corticosteroids [2] or treated with low [3] or high doses [4], and overall survival (OS) was analyzed by the time of corticosteroid treatment. Landmark analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard model with time-dependent covariates. A high-dose steroid treatment within 60 days correlated with a significantly worse OS than that of the group with irAEs without steroids (p=0.004). Moreover, there was no significant difference in OS between the irAE without steroid and low-dose steroid groups. Early severe irAEs and high-dose corticosteroid treatment were poor prognostic factors in patients with NSCLC treated with PD-1 inhibitors.

Effects of postoperative radiotherapy and docetaxel and PD-1 inhibitors on the survival and safety of glioblastoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The present standard treatment rarely allows the complete removal of glioblastoma (GBM). So postoperative treatments are provided to prevent or delay tumor recurrence. The overall survival (OS) rate and safety of postoperative chemotherapy alone, or combined with radiotherapy (RT), or programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor in GBM is still unclear. The present goal was to explore postoperative treatment's effect on the survival and safety of patients with GBM. We searched the mainstream online databases for clinical studies of RT and chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitors in the treatment of GBM published up to May 2020. The patients in the experimental group accepted an anti-PD-1 drug alone and RT + chemotherapy, whereas the controlled patients were treated with docetaxel alone. The literature qualities were assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0, and studies were assigned. The meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.4 software. A total of 927 articles were identified through the online database search. The articles unable to meet the inclusion criteria were excluded leaving 6 studies for inclusion in the study. Compared with docetaxel-based chemotherapy for GBM, combined RT chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitor therapy had better OS [mean difference (MD), -1.75; 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.99 to -0.51; P=0.006] and progression-free survival (PFS) and a lower incidence of adverse reactions (MD, -7.03; 95% CI: -7.64 to -6.42; P<0.00001) above grade III. Postoperative combination of RT and chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitors had some advantages over docetaxel in terms of effectiveness. More clinical trials are needed to confirm effectiveness.

Effectiveness and safety of programmed cell death-1 inhibitor in the treatment of advanced non-HBV non-HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma

Effectiveness and safety of programmed cell death-1 inhibitor in the treatment of advanced non-HBV non-HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma

Role of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Literature Review.

Numerous malignancies, including metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which has long been associated with a poor prognosis, have been transformed by the widespread use of immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that target and block programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) have demonstrated encouraging outcomes in the treatment of patients with metastatic TNBC. The PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab is the first-line treatment of metastatic PD-L1+ TNBC in combination with chemotherapy, and the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab has also shown clinical activity. The median progression-free survival for pembrolizumab or atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy increased by 4.1 months and 2.5 months, respectively, with the addition of immunotherapy. Despite this progress, there is still more to be desired. The addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy improved the pathological complete response (PCR) rate compared to chemotherapy with placebo in landmark phase III trials in the early-stage neoadjuvant context, whereas others reported no meaningful improvement in PCR.There are various ongoing trials that show that more research and studies are needed for components in the TNBC microenvironmentand to further explore its importance in the treatment of TNBC.

Toxicity profile of combined immune checkpoint inhibitors and thoracic radiotherapy in esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Therapies based on the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) are transforming the treatment landscape of esophageal cancer. Nevertheless, the available data on adverse events (AEs) mainly stemmed from several prospective clinical trials and retrospective studies, in which, AE data are often handled and reported with less rigor than the primary beneficial outcomes of the study. Thus, we conducted a systematic review to investigate the toxicity spectrum of these novel regimens. We searched for all prospective clinical trials investigating the role of ICIs combined with TRT published between January 2010 and August 2022. Study articles and conference proceedings involving esophageal cancers and reporting the overall incidence or details of treatment-related AEs (trAEs) were synthesized to determine the toxicity profile of combination treatment. We compared trAEs between cancer type, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, and between sequential and concurrent administration of ICIs and TRT to identify potentially high-risk patients. We obtained toxicity data from 14 clinical trials involving 863 patients. The pooled overall incidence was 88.97% for any-grade trAEs and 18.48% for high-grade trAEs. The three most frequent non-hematologic any-grade trAEs were reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP, 63.80%), esophagitis (51.54%), and fatigue (33.63%). Meanwhile, RCCEP (15.69%) was the most common non-hematologic high-grade trAE, followed by nausea (4.91%) and anorexia (3.81%). The occurrence rates of any-grade and high-grade pneumonitis were 10.82% and 0.66%, respectively. In subgroup analysis, the toxicity profiles of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors were mostly similar, except for any-grade pneumonitis (15.20% vs 4.88%, p=0.03) and high-grade leukopenia (6.25% vs 59.09%, p=0.00). In addition, concurrent treatment seemed to have a higher incidence of any-grade trAEs (95.20% vs 70.85%, p=0.03) compared with sequential treatment. ESCC seems to have higher incidence of any-grade hypothyroidism (22.55% vs 8.96%, p=0.049) compared to EAC. Our study is the first systematic review to provide a toxicity profile of trAEs in esophageal cancer patients who received ICIs combined with TRT. Most AEs of this combination treatment are tolerable, although the incidence of any-grade trAEs was higher in the concurrent group. The difference in any-grade pneumonitis between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitor groups needs further validation in a large clinical trial.

Preliminary Analysis of Concurrent Programmed Cell Death-1 Inhibitor Combination with Chemoradiation for Recurrent/Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Phase II Study

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors has been recommended as the first-line treatment for recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC), but progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was still unsatisfactory. Basic studies have already confirmed PD-1 inhibitors had concurrent synergistic effect with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Few studies concerned about the treatment pattern for concurrent PD-1 inhibitors combination with chemoradiation for R/M NPC. There was still much uncertainty about the timing, fraction dose and total dose for PD-1 inhibitors combination with radiation. Therefore, we aimed to explore the substantial effect and toxicity of this new pattern for R/M NPC. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> We prospectively enrolled 42 R/M NPC patients from August 2018 to May 2021 in out institution. All the patients received concurrent PD-1 inhibitor combination with chemoradiation, and followed with maintenance of PD-1 inhibitors, and we analyzed PD-L1 expression by 22C3 kit. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were calculated by irRECIST 1.1. CTCAE-5.0 was used to evaluate the toxicity and Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze survival rate. <h3>Results</h3> The median age was 48 years old (range 25-81), the median follow up time was 16.5 months (range 2-62). Nine patients had recurrent disease, 33 patients had metastatic disease, and 3 patients had both recurrence and metastasis disease. The median numbers of metastatic sites were 3 (range 1-7), and the most common metastatic sites were lung and liver. All the recurrent and measurable metastatic lesions were treated with radiotherapy. 9 recurrent patients received a median radiation dose of 60Gy. The measurable metastatic lesions received a median radiation dose of 54Gy. The median cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy were 5. Median time of PD-1 inhibitor was 9.5 months. At 3 months after the completion of chemoradiation, ORR and DCR were 90.5% and 100% respectively. The median PFS was 18 months, with 6 and 12 months PFS rates were 90.2% and 70.7%. 1 and 2-years OS rates were 94.6% and 86.2%, and the median OS had not reached. For the PD-L1 expression, 24 patients were positive, 18 were negative. The median PFS was 20.7 and 16.5 months for positive and negative group, respectively (p=0.01). Most common G3-4 toxicities were leucopenia (45.2%), anemia (38.1%), anorexia (7.1%), and fatigue (7.1%). There was no G3-4 toxicity for pneumonia, and no G5 toxicity was observed. <h3>Conclusion</h3> This new treatment pattern of concurrent PD-1 inhibitors combination with chemoradiation shows a promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity for R/M NPC. The patients with positive PD-L1 expression had better survival outcome than negative group. Keywords: PD-1 inhibitors, concurrent, recurrent, metastatic, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, chemoradiation