395 Background: Anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) therapy plus chemotherapy has become standard first-line therapy for patients with high PD-L1-expressing advanced ESCC. The benefit for patients with low PD-L1-expressing ESCC remains debatable. Methods: Eligible studies were phase III trials investigating anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy plus chemotherapy (immunochemotherapy) vs chemotherapy as first-line therapy of advanced ESCC. Study-level pooled analyses of hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), were used to compare the different groups in random-effects model. PD-L1 expression levels with tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 1% vs < 1%, tumor area positivity (TAP) ≥ 10% vs < 10%, and combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10 vs < 10 were collectively categorized as high vs low PD-L1 expression. The impact of two different chemotherapy regimens, TP (paclitaxel plus platinum) and PF (platinum pus fluoropyrimidine), stratified by PD-L1 expression levels, on the survival benefit of immunochemotherapy vs chemotherapy was investigated. Results: Eight randomized controlled trials including 4733 subjects were enrolled. Immunochemotherapy vs chemotherapy was associated with significantly improved PFS and OS irrespective of PD-L1 expression levels or chemotherapy regimens (Table). The PFS and OS benefits were more pronounced in high PD-L1 group than low PD-L1 group. In patients with high PD-L1 expression, the PFS and OS benefits were not significantly different between two chemotherapy regimen subgroups. However, in patients with low PD-L1 expression, the PFS benefit was more significant in TP subgroup than PF subgroup, and OS benefit trended to be in favor of TP subgroup. Conclusions: The addition of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy to TP chemotherapy may associate with more significant survival benefit than to PF chemotherapy in advanced ESCC with low PD-L1 expression. Population PFS (immunochemotherapy vs chemotherapy) OS (immunochemotherapy vs chemotherapy) HR(95% CI) P value(subgroup differences) HR(95% CI) P value(subgroup differences) All patients 0.63 (0.57-0.69) 0.69 (0.64-0.74) High PD-L1 group 0.54 (0.49-0.60) P < 0.01 0.60 (0.53-0.67) P < 0.01 Low PD-L1 group 0.71 (0.62-0.81) 0.78 (0.70-0.87) TP group 0.56 (0.50-0.62) P < 0.01 0.66 (0.59-0.74) P = 0.32 PF group 0.68 (0.62-0.75) 0.72 (0.65-0.79) Among high PD-L1 patients TP subgroup 0.56 (0.45-0.69) P = 0.75 0.60 (0.46-0.78) P = 0.90 PF subgroup 0.53 (0.45-0.62) 0.59 (0.50-0.69) Among low PD-L1 patients TP subgroup 0.59 (0.48-0.74) P = 0.01 0.72 (0.55-0.93) P = 0.32 PF subgroup 0.82 (0.72-0.94) 0.84 (0.72-0.97)
Read full abstract