Ranking Of Programs Research Articles

Trends in PubMed-Indexed Research in Matched Urology Applicants: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 2017 to 2021 Match Cycles

Purpose: Urology is one of the most competitive specialties for residency matches in the United States. Data reported by the American Urological Association from match cycles spanning 2014 to 2021 reveal a median of 0.34% (0%-3%) of unfilled spots, a median of 1.48 (1.28-1.87) applicants per position, and a median of 75% (63%-87%) match rate. Recent research has shown that program directors value applicants' research highly. We sought to assess the research productivity of matched urology residency applicants, identify trends in research volume over time, and investigate the potential correlation between research output and program ranking. Materials and Methods: Doximity Urology program ranking list from the 2017 to 2021 match cycles was sorted by reputation, extracted, and populated using each program's official website resident roster, including name, medical school, postgraduate year, and additional degrees. Rosters were crossed-checked against social media posts from the official accounts. Each identified urology resident was queried in PubMed. Journal ranking was determined through Scimagojr; top-quartile journals were classified as Q1. Results: In total 131 of 145 programs were identified, and 1605 matched applicants spanning the 2017 to 2021 match cycles. The mean and median total publications were 2.44 and 1, respectively, and 2.17 and 1 when excluding case reports. 64.2% of applicants had at least one publication, and 42.2% had at least one urological publication. Applicants matching into higher-ranked programs had more research and urological research. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that Q1 research (β 2.38) and urology research (β 2.33) significantly affected rank. Match cycle analysis revealed an increase in total and urology-focused research, whereas regression analysis demonstrated significant increases in total publications (β 0.019) per cycle. Conclusion: Overall research, urology-focused research, first authorship, and publication in higher-ranked journals play an essential role in the urology match.

Is the h-Index Enough? A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of 871 Academic Plastic Surgeons and Their Departments/Divisions.

In plastic surgery academia, research output is heavily used as a metric of accreditation, from assessing residency applicants to evaluating faculty for promotion. The h index, defined as an author's h papers with at least h citations, is commonly used as a measure of academic success. However, the index itself disfavors junior researchers, favors publication quantity, and discounts highly cited works. Given the importance of bibliometrics within plastic surgery, there is a paramount need to adopt additional metrics to measure research productivity. The authors sought to validate the use of time-independent bibliometrics to complement the h index in measuring citation impact. The genders and academic titles of plastic surgeons affiliated with US plastic surgery programs were recorded. Author publications were retrieved from Scopus. Bibliometrics software was used to calculate the following metrics per surgeon: h index, e index, and g index. Time-adjusted versions of these indices were used to correct for the number of years since first publication. Medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) are reported. Departmental ranks were determined using the cumulative sum of time-corrected indices and compared with Doximity departmental research rankings. P < 0.05 was deemed significant. Indices were calculated for 871 academic plastic surgeons in 85 departments/divisions. Men had statistically greater h index (median, 13.0 [IQR, 7.0-21.0] vs 6.0 [IQR, 3.0-13]; P < 0.001), e index (18.3 [IQR, 10.0-28.7] vs 11.1 [IQR, 5.5-18.4]; P < 0.001), and g index (23.0 [IQR, 11.0-39.0] vs 11.0 [IQR, 5.0-22.0]; P < 0.001) than women. Professors had the highest median time-uncorrected indices. After adjusting for the number of years since an author's first publication, there were no significant differences in m quotient (men: 0.66 [IQR, 0.40-0.98] vs women: 0.57 [IQR, 0.33-0.90]; P = 0.05) and ec index (men: 0.93 [IQR, 0.62-1.3] vs women: 0.87 [IQR, 0.50-1.3]; P = 0.08) between genders. Departmental chairs had significantly higher indices than other faculty after correcting for time. The calculated program rankings were low to moderately correlated with that of Doximity (correlation coefficient τ = 0.49 [95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.59; P < 0.001]). Men and women have statistically similar citation patterns after correcting for the time. Citation differences between academic levels are less pronounced when controlling for time, suggesting comparable research quality between academic roles.

Applicant-Fellow Virtual Sessions in Recruitment for Gastroenterology Fellowship.

Since the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, virtual interviews have become a norm for gastroenterology (GI) fellowship recruitment. Most interviews hold a session for applicant and current fellow interaction. There is wide variability of the sessions across programs. There are a paucity of data on the influence of these sessions on applicants' ranking of programs. We aim to describe applicants' experiences and perceptions of virtual happy hours (i.e., applicant-fellow sessions) during the GI fellowship application process. We surveyed applicants participating in the 2022 GI fellowship match cycle to understand their experience with virtual fellow-only happy hours. Mixed methods analyses were performed. The survey was completed by 68 (13.91%) applicants, of which, 75% reported that at least half of the interviews they attended had conducted a virtual, fellow-only happy hour. Most respondents preferred that the virtual happy hours should be conducted prior to the interview day (58%) and that breakout rooms with a smaller ratio of applicants to fellows are helpful (78%). The majority (87%) of respondents reported attending these sessions at least 75% of the time. Nearly half (44%) of respondents reported that these sessions influenced/altered their ranking decisions with respect to programs. Given the advantages associated with virtual interviews and their ongoing support by professional societies, the virtual platform is likely here to stay in future. Virtual fellow-only happy hours help provide a representation of the program's mission and when successfully implemented, can be leveraged to optimize recruitment and attract qualified, diverse candidates.

High Research Productivity During Orthopaedic Surgery Residency May Be Predicted by Number of Publications as a Medical Student.

Orthopaedic applicants have increased the average number of publications on their residency application to compete with the growing competitiveness of the field. The purpose of this study was to assess whether research productivity before orthopaedic residency and caliber of one's institution is correlated with academic productivity during residency. Scopus was used to extract publication metrics. Quantity and quality (how often the publications were cited) were analyzed at 2 different time periods: before and during residency. All subjects in the study had graduated an ACGME-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency in 2021. Military residents, international medical graduates, and residents not listed on their department's website were excluded. Residents were categorized as both high (≥2 publications) or low (<2 publications) publishers according to their pre-residency publications. They were also categorized based on their program's Jones et al. research productivity ranking. For the 758 residents, the median number of publications was 0 (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 0-2) and 3 (IQR: 1-6) before and during residency, respectively. High publishing medical students had more publications during training than low publishers (6 [IQR: 3-14] and 2 [IQR: 1-4], p < 0.001). Residents at higher ranked programs also had more publications (4 [IQR: 2-9] and 2 [IQR: 0-4], p < 0.001). High publishing students now training at lower ranked institutions had more publications during residency than low publishers who trained at more productive institutions (4 [IQR: 1-9] and 3 [IQR: 1-6], p < 0.001). Having 2 or more publications before residency is correlated with an increased number of publications during residency. While attending a higher academically productive program is associated with increased resident publications, a high publishing medical student would be expected to have more publications during residency than a low publishing student, regardless of program rank. Notably, most matched applicants continue to have zero publications before matriculation.

Exploring Trends in Immediate Postresidency Career Paths: A Multi-year Analysis of Plastic Surgery Resident Graduates Across the United States.

Plastic surgery is one of the most diverse specialties in medicine. Because of the competitiveness of plastic surgery residency, applicants are entering the field with increased experience and more developed interests in specific specialties. Programs and prospective applicants may find it beneficial to know trends in the career paths of recent graduates. To identify trends in postresidency career paths for plastic surgery graduates. Data from all integrated plastic surgery residency programs were analyzed from 2013 to 2022. Eighty-eight residency programs were analyzed for review. Residency websites were the primary source of data. Postresidency career paths were categorized into subspecialty fellowships, academic practice, or private practice. Secondary data included program rank, size of the program, associated fellowship program, associated independent program, and program location. Seventy-three programs met the inclusion criteria. Private practice was the most common immediate postgraduation path. Microvascular and aesthetic fellowships demonstrated maximum growth in the last 10 years, followed by hand fellowships. Programs ranked in the top 25 by Doximity reputation were significantly associated with graduates going into craniofacial (P = .05) and microvascular fellowship (P = .021), and immediate academic practice (P = .011). Lower-ranked programs were correlated with higher levels of graduates entering directly into private/community hospital practice (ρ = 0.327). Life after residency is a necessary consideration for training physicians. Understanding trends in postresidency career paths could help programs and prospective applicants make more informed decisions on what programs may offer the best opportunities to pursue their desired career path.

Athletic competition between the states: The rapid spread of Name, Image, Likeness laws and why it matters for understanding policy diffusion

AbstractIn the study of the policy diffusion process, scholars have found that states adopt policies to remain competitive with one another over economic resources. But the rapid spread of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) policies, which treat college athletes as professionals, is not readily explained by economic competition nor other diffusion mechanisms. The NIL phenomenon points to a new dimension of competition between the states, which is more closely tied to states protecting or enhancing their reputations than it is to directly accruing economic resources. To test if NIL spread as the result of athletic reputation competition, we model the adoption of NIL legislation as a function of internal characteristics (i.e. number, value, and ranking of college football programs) and interstate dynamics (i.e. actions of football, conference, and Power 5 competitors). We test the effect of these measures alongside traditional diffusion indicators, finding that both internal and interstate indicators of athletic competition drive states to adopt and implement NIL. NIL is important to study as it has changed the landscape of amateur sports, as well as our scholarly understanding of policy diffusion in the American federal system, specifically broadening our conceptualization of the competition mechanism and developing customized measures of it.

Education Research: Virtual Residency Interviews and the Second Look: The Mayo Clinic Neurology Tri-Site Experience.

The 2023 Match cycle was the third virtual interview season for adult neurology residency programs. This recruitment cycle differed from years prior because an in-person second-look event was offered by some programs to complement the virtual interview day. We sought feedback from those who interviewed for adult neurology residency positions at Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota to gain applicants' perspectives on such events and identify best practices to improve the interview experience for future applicants. Virtual interviews were conducted for adult neurology residency positions at Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota for the 2023 Match. Each site hosted optional, in-person, no-stakes second-look events after program rank lists were finalized. After Match Day, interviewees at all 3 sites were invited to complete an anonymous electronic survey using Qualtrics software to gather feedback on the in-person events. Of the 240 interviewees for adult neurology residency positions at Mayo Clinic, 52 candidates participated in the in-person second-look event on the Arizona, Florida, or Minnesota campus in 2023. One-third of applicants (80/240) completed the anonymous survey, and of them, 34% (27/80) of respondents had attended a Mayo Clinic second-look event. The desire to step foot on campus, meet the residents in person, and visit the geographic area were the most important reasons driving attendance. Those who did not participate cited financial burden, lack of time, and insufficient notice to make travel plans as the most common factors influencing their decision not to attend. Nearly half of attendees who responded to the survey (10/21, 48%) changed their rank order list after the in-person event. Most of them who participated in a Mayo Clinic second-look event (19/21, 91%) would encourage future applicants to partake. While there are many advantages to virtual residency interviews, most applicants who participated in second-look events found that having an opportunity to visit the program in person was valuable when determining their rank list. Offering an optional, no-stakes, in-person visit allows interviewees to make more informed rank lists. Second-look events have the potential to complement the virtual interview day and may ultimately lead to greater satisfaction for matched applicants.

Variable Practice, Variable Results: Impact of Postinterview Communication Practices Among Critical Care Medicine/Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Applicants and Program Directors

BackgroundWhile post-interview communication (PIC) guidelines exist, adherence is voluntary. There are no studies of PIC practices in Critical Care Medicine (CCM) and Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) fellowship recruitment. Research QuestionWhat is the frequency, format, goals, and content of PIC between CCM/PCCM applicants and program directors (PD)? What is the impact of PIC on applicant and program rank order lists (ROL)? Study Design and MethodsCCM/PCCM applicants and PDs were separately surveyed after the 2022-2023 National Resident Matching Program Specialty Match. Surveys included multiple-choice, Likert-scale, and two free text questions. Thematic content analysis of free text responses was performed. ResultsOne-third of eligible participants responded (applicants: n=373, 34%; PDs: n=86, 32%). Applicant respondents applied to CCM (19%), PCCM (69%), or both (12%). PDs represented CCM (17%), PCCM (57%), or both (26%) programs. Applicant (66%) and PD (49%) respondents reported initiating PIC. PIC did not impact ROL decision for most applicants (73%) or PDs (83%), though 21% of applicants and 17% of PDs moved programs or applicants up on their ROL in response to PIC. A quarter (23%) of applicants strongly agreed or agreed that PIC was helpful in creating their ROL, 27% strongly disagreed or disagreed, and 29% were neutral. PIC challenges identified by both groups included time, lack of uniformity, peer pressure, misleading language, and uncertainty about motives, rules, and response protocols. InterpretationPIC is common among CCM/PCCM applicants and PDs. About 50% of applicants and 20% of PDs share ranking intentions via PIC. While PIC did not impact ROL for most applicants and PDs, a minority of applicants and PDs moved programs up on their ROL after receiving PIC from the other party. Applicants have mixed perspectives on PIC value. Applicants and PDs alike desire clear guidance on PIC to minimize ambiguous and misleading communication.

Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendation: Relevance to Urology Match Outcomes and Pursuit of Fellowship Training/Academic Career

To review applications to a single urology residency program to determine application characteristics predictive of (1) successful match into urology residency and (2) pursuit of fellowship training and/or academic practice after completion of residency. Our principal variables of interest were gender bias as assessed in letters of recommendation (LOR), personal statements, Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE), race, and gender. Applications submitted to our urology residency program in the 2014 cycle were reviewed. Twenty-three variables were analyzed, including applicant demographics, application materials, and gender bias. Deidentified text from LOR, personal statements, and MSPE was evaluated for gender bias using an open-source gender bias calculator. A subanalysis of applicants who matched at a top 25 urology program was performed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify applicant variables associated with (1) match success and (2) fellowship training or academic employment as of September 2021. Two hundred and twenty-two completed applications were analyzed. First authorship of a published manuscript was significantly associated with greater odds of matching. Female gender and top 25 medical school attendance were both significant predictors of matching at a top 25 urology program. The number of first-author publications was associated with completion of fellowship training or current employment in an academic position. First-author publications are the most important preinterview determinant of match success and subsequent pursuit of academic practice/fellowship training. Certain applicant characteristics are associated with matching at highly ranked programs. Gender bias in application materials (including LOR) does not appear to exert a significant influence on match and early career outcomes.

Exploring the Validity and Reliability of Neurosurgery Residency Program Rankings: A Quantitative Analysis

To evaluate the relationships between Doximity rankings (Doximity, Inc.) of residency programs and 2 new ranking systems based on publication rates and academic pursuits. We collected data on 550 neurosurgery graduates over 3years. We analyzed the median number of published manuscripts per resident and the percentage of residents pursuing academic careers and compared them across the Doximity Research Productivity and Reputation Rankings. We used logistic regression to evaluate the relationships among the rankings, publication rates, and academic pursuits. Neurosurgery residents published a median of 10 manuscripts per person (IQR: 6-17), and 50% (IQR: 33%-67%) of residents in a given program pursued an academic career. The distributions of the median number of published manuscripts across the Doximity Research Productivity Ranking and the Doximity Reputation Ranking tiers differed significantly (all P<0.001). Similarly, the distribution of the percentage of residents pursuing an academic career across both published Doximity ranking systems' tiers differed significantly (all P=0.02). Moreover, we found moderate agreement between the 2 Doximity rankings, fair agreement between the publication and the other 3 rankings, and slight agreement between the academic pursuit and the Doximity rankings. We introduced 2 new methods to rank residency programs based on the number of graduates pursuing an academic position and the median number of published manuscripts per resident. By taking a comprehensive approach, neurosurgery applicants can ensure that they select a residency program that meets their needs and offers them the best opportunity for success.

Selecting an Endourology Society Fellowship Program: The Candidates' Perspectives.

Introduction: Understanding the factors that influence the decision of urology residents to pursue an Endourology Society (ES) fellowship and the criteria used by applicants to rank programs may help residents and program directors (PDs) optimize the match process. In the present study, we surveyed current ES fellows to gain better insight surrounding their decision-making process. Materials and Methods: A survey was emailed to all ES fellows, comprising Endourology and Stone Disease (ESD), Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery (MIS), and combination of ESD/MIS (COM) programs. A Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 was used. The survey captured demographics such as geographic region, program type, duration, applicants' reasons for pursuing fellowship, criteria for ranking programs, and perceived improvements in surgical comfort levels at the end of their training. Results: Out of the 60 fellows who were surveyed, 40 (66.7%) responded. Among the respondents, 9 (22.5%) pursued ESD, 10 (25%) pursued MIS, and 21 (52.5%) pursued COM programs. The primary reason for seeking a fellowship was to improve surgical skills while increasing earning potential and enhancing research opportunities were deemed the least important. Fellows enrolled in 1-year programs were less likely to pursue fellowships for academic reasons. The two most significant factors in selecting a program were both related to gaining operative experience. Lastly, there was an increase in the level of comfort performing all endourological surgeries independently after fellowship. Conclusions: ES fellowship is seen as an opportunity to hone surgical skills and increase job competitiveness. When selecting a program, operative experience is the most important factor, and fellowship improves operative confidence. The information obtained from this study may mutually help guide future applicants and PDs in the decision process of the Endourology Match.

Ranking the community psychology research output of institutions and authors: A new system of evaluating the field.

There have been multiple efforts to evaluate the contributions of the field of Community Psychology, and one of the more popular methods has involved gathering citations and articles published in Community Psychology journals. In recent years, several sites have gathered citation analysis and article publication rates so that it is now relatively easy to summarize settings and scholar rankings. In the current study, articles published in the two major journals of the field of Community Psychology over the past five decades were evaluated for these publications and citations. Findings indicated that several of the settings with highest publication and citation rates have not developed Community Psychology graduate programs, thus indicating that many publishing authors are in settings without formal graduate programs in Community Psychology. The benefits and limitations of this method of ranking programs and individuals are reviewed.

The Rich Get Richer: The Matthew Effect in Open Payments

IntroductionThe Matthew Effect refers to a pattern of accumulated advantage, specifically how social status can lead to increased wealth and recognition. The Physician Payments Sunshine Act of the Affordable Care Act requires industry payments and the affiliated hospital to be publicly available through the Open Payments Database (OPD). The US News and World Report (USNWR) publishes a ranking of best medical school (research) programs yearly. The Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research (BRIMR) ranks medical schools annually by the amount of funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Whether medical school–affiliated hospitals with higher social ranking and more NIH funding receive more industrial support is unknown. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between open payment of medical school–affiliated hospitals and USNWR and BRIMR ranking. MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of the OPD for the fiscal year of 2021. Hospital industry payment information was collected for affiliated hospitals in general and research categories. NIH funding data and program rankings were collected from BRIMR and USNWR, respectively. All data were collected for the fiscal year of 2021. The open payments of schools ranked in the top 50 for USNWR (n = 50) and BRIMR (n = 49) were compared to the schools not ranked in the top 50 using SPSS with chi-squared and Mann–Whitney U tests. A multivariate linear regression was performed to evaluate the association between open payments, USNWR ranking, and BRIMR ranking. ResultsA total of 91 medical schools were included in this study. The top 50 ranked medical schools by BRIMR were found to have a higher median of total open payment ($5,652,628 versus $2,558,372, P < 0.001), open payment in research ($4,707,297 versus $1,992,597, P = 0.003), and general open payment ($1,083,018 versus $392,045, P < 0.001). When ranked by USNWR, the top 50 ranked medical schools were found similarly to have a higher median of total open payment (P < 0.001), open payment in research (P < 0.001), and general open payment (P < 0.001). USNWR ranking was an independent predictor of more total open payment (Coefficient 0.016, 95% confidence interval 0.002-0.029, P = 0.026) and research open payment (coefficient 0.018, 95% confidence interval 0.002-0.034, P = 0.028). USNWR ranking was not found to predict general open payments. BRIMR ranking was not associated with open payment in total, research, or general. ConclusionsHospital open payments were associated with the social reputation of their medical schools. NIH funding was not associated with open payments. A Matthew effect exists in current industry payments to medical school–affiliated hospitals.

Exploring the Agreement Between Perceived Rankings and Outcome Data Rankings for Professional Athletic Training Programs

Context The U.S. News &amp; World Report college ranking system is used to describe the best graduate programs in the country. Rankings of graduate programs are based solely on perceived ratings of quality by directors and/or deans. Athletic training is not listed by U.S. News &amp; World Report; however, the Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education (CAATE) reports key metrics such as the Board of Certification pass rate and program graduation rate, which could be helpful to create rankings. Objective To evaluate and rank CAATE-accredited professional athletic training (PAT) programs using 2 models: (1) perceived rating of academic quality by program directors (PDs) and (2) CAATE outcome data. Design Cross-sectional with survey and retrospective data. Setting Web-based survey. Patients or Other Participants One hundred fifty-five PDs and 230 CAATE-accredited PAT programs. Main Outcome Measure(s) The perceived rating survey for the PDs resembled the U.S. News &amp; World Report system using a 5-point Likert scale to assess the academic quality of each program. For the CAATE outcome data, we used publicly available information for each PAT program on the CAATE website. We ranked all PAT programs using the data from each model. A Cohen κ was performed to explore the agreement between the PDs’ perceived ranking and the CAATE outcome data rankings. Results No agreement was found between the perceived peer assessment and CAATE outcome data rankings (κ = −0.003, P = .401). Conclusion Perception by PDs did not align with objective data reported by CAATE. The lack of agreement between the 2 ranking systems highlights concerns about using the U.S. News &amp; World Report system for graduate health programs. We suggest exploring a more robust and comprehensive formula including overall pass rate and graduation rate to identify top-ranked programs in athletic training.

Pengaruh Green Business dan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan: Corporate Social Responsibility sebagai Pemoderasi

The aim of this study was conducted to find out whether green business using the annual reports of companies that received the Pollution Control, Evaluation and Ranking Program Award (PROPER) corporate social responsibility is influenced by the characteristics of the board of commissioners (number of independent commissioners, diversity of the board of commissioners, and concentration of ownership) and whether financial performance (ROA, ROE and Tobin's Q) is moderated by corporate social responsibility, in companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2015 to 2022. The population used is all companies listed on the Stock Exchange Indonesia for five consecutive years. The sampling method was selected using purposive sampling, namely non-financial companies included in Pefindo 25. This study used a quantitative approach. The samples used in this study were 22 companies with 110 observations. The data analysis method uses panel data regression (Eviews 9) with Descriptive Statistical Tests, Model Conformity Tests, namely the Chow test and Hausman test, followed by the F test, the Goodness of Fit test, the hypothesis test, and finally the t test. The results of research on green economy and good corporate governance which are proxied by the number of independent commissioners, the diversity of the board of commissioners and the majority ownership of the company have a positive effect on financial performance. moderated by corporate social responsibility has no positive effect on financial performance proxied by ROA, ROE and leverage.

The Utility of a Virtual Emergency Medicine Elective for Visiting Medical Students.

Background Away rotations allow emergency medicine (EM)-bound fourth-year medical students to experience a residency program's educational culture and influence the ranking of residency programs. The financial cost and geographic distance have limited student participation in away electives. In recent years, COVID-19 pandemic-related restrictions on away rotations resulted in the creation of multiple virtual courses. Despite the lifting of restrictions, these courses may still have utility in helping students circumvent barriers to away rotations. Limitations of previously described courses include insufficient student-faculty interaction, which influences students' understanding of the educational environment. We sought to develop and evaluate a virtual EM elective for fourth-year medical students, focused on student-faculty interaction including precepted patient contact. Methodology We developed a two-week virtual EM elective for fourth-year medical students incorporating teaching sessions designed to optimize student-faculty interactions and attending-supervised telemedicine visits. After completion of the course, students completed an anonymous course evaluation. Results Course evaluations showed that the course improved students' understanding of our residency's educational environment by providing students with access to our residency program. The most frequently cited factors preventing participation in a traditional away elective were financial cost, limit in the allowed number of away rotations, and challenges in finding housing. Conclusions We believe this course may be an effective way of improving visiting students' understanding of the educational culture of our EM residency program. Thus, although pandemic-related restrictions have been lifted, this course may serve as a valuable adjunct to the traditional away EM rotation.

Intern Experience Reflects Information Gathered During the Virtual Interview Process

The onset of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic brought many changes to the residency application process including transitioning to a virtual interview platform, which continues today. The transition brought many concerns from general surgery applicants about their ability to obtain adequate information about a program virtually. We sought to characterize how information presented by programs during the first ever virtual interview cycle matched the experience of general surgery interns after training at a program for 1 year. In May of 2022, a survey was distributed to 243 program directors who were asked to forward it to their general surgery categorical interns who matched during the 2021 virtual match cycle. Demographics, resources used to determine an impression of a program, and correlations between information presented virtually and what was subsequently experienced as an intern were collected. Forty-six program directors confirmed forwarding the survey to their categorical interns. A total of 102 general surgery interns completed the survey. Most interns (88.2%) agreed that their experience matched expectations based on information received through the virtual interview process and 98% of interns were satisfied with their experience at their training program. Interviews with faculty (40.0%), residents (68.0%) and the program web site (29.0%) were the top 3 resources used to create the most accurate impression of a program. Interns felt they were well informed during the virtual interview experience about support from fellow residents (84.3%), culture (73.0%), surgical volume (72.5%), and intern operative experience (71.6%). In addition, 65.7% of participants thought they were able to obtain a good understanding of the program's culture from the virtual process. However, 16.7% thought that their program unintentionally misrepresented aspects of the training program. The faculty and residency interviews were the most important factors in program ranking and most participants agreed that their virtual interview experience matched their expectations during their intern year. Most interns felt they were able to obtain a good understanding of the program's culture from the virtual process. In addition, a majority of interns felt well informed during the interview on aspects ranging from surgical volume, autonomy, and work hours to support from faculty and residents. If virtual interviews are to continue, residents can be satisfied that information gathered virtually will match the reality of their training. Programs should continue to make every effort to present their program realistically.

Assessment of Neurology Residency Program Websites across North America during COVID-19.

With virtual interviews for residency applications, residency program websites have become increasingly important resources for applicants. We evaluated the comprehensiveness of US and Canadian neurology residency program website, comparing this to published rankings of the best neurology and neurosurgery hospitals (for US programs) and number of residency positions (for US and Canadian programs). US program websites were found to be largely more comprehensive than Canadian websites, more extensive websites were associated with better program rankings and fewer residency seats in the US, and US regional differences in comprehensiveness were present. We recommend standardized guidelines to increase website comprehensiveness across programs.

Predictors of Career Placement Among American Neurotology Society Fellowship Graduates.

To identify predictors of practice type and location after neurotology fellowship based on demographics and educational history. Cross-sectional analysis. Conference programs from the American Neurotology Society Spring Meeting from 2016 to 2022. Percentage of neurotologists who pursued academic careers. A total of 114 neurotology fellows were identified. Of the 98 individuals included in final analysis, 64 (65%) pursued academic careers. Fellows most likely to enter academic practice trained at a residency program ranked in the top 50% based on Doximity residency rankings by reputation (74 versus 45%, p < 0.01) or graduated from a residency program with a neurotology fellowship (82 versus 56%, p < 0.01). Graduates from fellowship programs in the Northeast were most likely to enter academic careers (83%). Fifty percent of neurotologists practiced in the same region as their residency training, and 48% practiced the same region as their fellowship. The region with the highest number of practicing neurotology graduates was the South (47%). Residency program ranking and residency institutions with neurotology fellowships were the leading predictors of academic career placement in the field of neurotology. Many neurotologists tend to stay in a similar geographical location to where they underwent medical training.

Predictors of Matching into Anesthesiology and Surgery: Analysis of One Program's Results

The objectives of this study were to use a multivariable regression model to determine what application factors made anesthesiology and surgery applicants more or less likely to match into an anesthesiology or surgery residency program. Surgery and Anesthesiology applicants listed on the final National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) Rank Order Lists from WMC in the 2020-2021 application cycle were included in analysis. All applicant data were collected through the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS). All ERAS and letters of recommendation (LOR) data were deidentified and LOR were subsequently inputted into a linguistics software to analyze the language use in LOR. Descriptive analyses were conducted to compare variables between applicants that matched to a specific residency program and those who matched elsewhere. A multivariable regression model was then used to determine characteristics of anesthesiology and surgery applicants that were indicative of matching to a specific rank of residency program. A total of 116 anesthesiology and 78 surgery applicants were included in final analysis. Analysis of anesthesiology applicants yielded four significant application characteristics that influenced matching to a higher or lower ranked residency program: USMLE Step 2 CK scores, medical school attended, insight category words in LOR, and anger category words in LOR. Similarly, analysis of surgery applicants yielded four significant characteristics: Race, USMLE Step 1 scores, insight category words, and see category words. Our results demonstrated that specialties of anesthesiology and surgery considered different metrics regarding the residency application process. Among the many factors that were analyzed, USMLE scores and language in LOR were considered significant in both specialties. As the application process continues to evolve, we may see a shift in what application factors are considered more important than others.