Prognostic Factors For Pulmonary Metastasectomy Research Articles

Prognostic Factors of Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Oligometastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Spread to the Lungs.

Background/Objectives: Pulmonary metastasis is the most prevalent type of extrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) metastasis. International guidelines recommend systemic treatment for patients with HCC having pulmonary metastases. However, the role of pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) remains relatively unexplored. Therefore, we assessed the survival outcomes and the factors influencing them in patients who underwent PM for metastatic HCC. Methods: Clinical data were collected from patients with HCC who underwent PM for metastasis at a single tertiary center between January 2004 and December 2022. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors associated with survival outcomes. Results: Overall, 63 patients underwent PM with a median follow-up time of 84.0 months. The cumulative survival rates after the initial PM at 1, 2, and 5 years were 79.1%, 63.9%, and 35.6%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, early intrathoracic recurrence <6 months, number and size of metastases, resection margin status, and PM bilaterality were significantly associated with overall survival. A larger size of the primary HCC, increased number of repeated PM, and frequent lobectomy were more common in patients with early (<6 months) recurrence after PM than in those without early recurrence. Conclusions: PM in patients with metastatic HCC may provide acceptable survival outcomes for those with smaller, unilateral lung metastases that can be resected with generous surgical margins. However, early recurrence with reduced overall survival is likely in patients with a larger-size initial HCC after prior PM and lobectomy.

Survival after Lung Metastasectomy from Esophageal Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Database

To clarify the clinical impact and to identify prognostic predictors of surgical intervention for pulmonary metastasis from esophageal cancer, a registry database analysis was performed. From January 2000 to March 2020, patients who underwent resection of pulmonary metastases from primary esophageal cancer at 18 institutions were registered in a database developed by the Metastatic Lung Tumor Study Group of Japan. An amount of 109 cases were reviewed and examined for the prognostic factors for pulmonary metastasectomy of metastases from esophageal cancer. As a result, five-year overall survival after pulmonary metastasectomy was 34.4% and five-year disease-free survival was 22.1%. The multivariate analysis for overall survival revealed that initial recurrence site, maximum tumor size, and duration from primary tumor treatment to lung surgery were selected as the significant prognostic factors (p = 0.043, p = 0.048, and p = 0.037, respectively). In addition, from the results of the multivariate analysis for disease free survival, number of lung metastases, initial recurrence site, duration from primary tumor treatment to lung surgery, and preoperative chemotherapy for lung metastasis were selected as the significant prognostic factors (p = 0.037, p = 0.008, p = 0.010, and p = 0.020, respectively). In conclusion, eligible patients with pulmonary metastasis from esophageal cancer selected based on the identified prognostic predictors would be good candidates for pulmonary metastasectomy.

Preoperative prognostic factors for 5-year survival following pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

We seek to identify preoperative prognostic factors and measure their effect on 5-year survival following pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for Colorectal Cancer (CRC). We systematically reviewed the databases of Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase and Google Scholar from January 2000 to April 2021 to identify preoperative factors that have been investigated for their prognostic effect on survival following PM. Quality assessment was performed using the QUIPS tool. The prognostic effect of each identified factor on 5-year survival post-PM was estimated using random-effects meta-analyses. We identified 115 eligible articles which included 13294 patients who underwent PM from CRC. The overall 5-year survival after resection of the lung metastasis was 54.1%. The risk of bias of the included studies was at least moderate in 93% (107/115). Seventy-seven preoperative factors had been investigated for their prognostic effect. Our analysis showed that 11 factors had favourable and statistically significant prognostic effect on 5-year survival post-PM. These included solitary metastasis, size <2 cm, unilateral location, N0 thoracic disease, no history of extra-thoracic or liver metastasis, normal carcinoembryonic antigen levels both before PM and CRC excision, no neo-adjuvant chemotherapy before PM, CRC T-stage < T4 and no p53 mutations on CRC. Disease-free interval at 24 months did not appear to affect 5-year survival. Despite the considerable risk of bias in the literature, our study consolidates the available evidence on preoperative prognostic factors for PM from CRC. These findings can complement both clinical practice and the design of future research on the field of PM.

Survival Outcomes of Complete Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas.

PurposeMetastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is relatively poor; however, depending on the selected cases, pulmonary metastasectomy can be a practical therapeutic option. This study aimed to identify the outcomes of complete metastasectomy based on each primary site and to investigate unfavorable prognostic factors.Patients and MethodsWe used the database from the Metastatic Lung Tumour Study Group of Japan. Between November 1980 and April 2017, 231 patients were deemed eligible. According to anatomy and the current epidemiology of HNSCC, the patients were divided into three groups: nasopharynx, oropharynx, and salivary gland (n = 40, Group 1), oral cavity, tongue, and paranasal sinuses (n = 69, Group 2), and larynx and hypopharynx (n = 122, Group 3).ResultsThe 5-year overall survival after complete pulmonary metastasectomy was 58.5%, 25.0%, and 46.9% in G1, 2, and 3, respectively (p < 0.01). Multivariate analyses revealed unfavourable prognostic factors to be G2, and pathological maximum diameter was >20 mm. Therefore, on dividing group 1 and 3 with or without diameter, the 5-year overall survival was significantly worse in HNSCC with a diameter >20 mm (n = 74) than that in the remnant (n = 88; 61.9% vs 35.5%; p < 0.01).ConclusionAccording to the multi-institutional Japanese data, pulmonary metastasectomy from HNSCC indicates a potential survival benefit. Oral cavity, tongue, and paranasal sinuses cancer, and tumour size (>20 mm) were poor prognostic factors for pulmonary metastasectomy from head and neck cancer.

Outcome of Repeated Resection of Pulmonary Metastases for Renal Cell Cancer.

To date, many studies investigated results and prognostic factors of pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) in renal cell cancer (RCC). However, reports concerning repeated resection for patients with recurrent pulmonary metastases (RPM) are limited. In this study, we analyzed safety, efficacy, and prognostic factors for survival after PM focusing on RPM for RCC. Clinical, operative, and follow-up data of patients who underwent PM or RPM for RCC in our institution were retrospectively collected and correlated with each other from January 2005 to December 2019. Altogether 154 oncological pulmonary resections in curative intention as PM or RPM were performed in 82 and 26 patients. Postoperative complications were similar in both groups (n = 22 [26.8%] vs. 4 [15.4%], p = 0.2). Zero mortality was documented up to the 30th postoperative day. RPM was not associated with decreased 5-year-survival compared with PM (66.2 vs. 57,9%, p = 0.5). Patients who underwent RPM for recurrent lung metastases had a better overall survival in comparison with the other treatments including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and best supportive care (p = 0.04). In the multivariate analysis, disease-free survival was identified as an independent prognostic factor for survival (hazard ratio: 0.969, 0.941-0.999, p = 0.04). RPM is a safe and feasible procedure. The resection of recurrent lung metastases shows to prolong survival in comparison with the other therapeutic options for selected patients with RCC.

Prognostic Factors of Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Soft Tissue Sarcomas Arising in the Trunk Wall and Extremities.

Simple SummaryPulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is often performed in sarcoma patients with resectable oligo-metastases in the lungs. Although there have been several studies on PM for sarcomas, few have analyzed only soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) arising in the trunk wall and extremities, and many of these studies are older. Therefore, it would be of interest to confirm the outcomes of PM for STS in recent years, when systemic treatment has advanced, in accordance with the latest WHO classification. In the present study, we investigated our recent results of PM for STSs arising in the trunk and extremities, and analyzed the prognostic factors and safety of PM.Although there is no evidence from prospective randomized controlled trials to support this practice, pulmonary metastases of sarcomas are often treated surgically if they are resectable. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prognostic factors and outcome of pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) arising in the trunk wall and extremities in 66 consecutive patients. Prognostic factors associated with disease-specific survival after PM were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. The patients included 38 men and 28 women, with a median age of 49 years. The median disease-specific survival after PM was 48 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 45%. No major perioperative complications occurred. Disease-free interval (<12 months), size of largest lung lesion (≥20 mm), and non-curative resection were independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. PM was effective in selected patients with pulmonary metastases from STSs arising in the trunk wall and extremities. Disease-free interval, maximum size of metastases, and resectability were identified as prognostic factors.

Prognostic Factors for Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Soft Tissue Sarcoma: An Integrative Review

The lung is one of the most common sites of metastasis from soft tissue sarcoma (STS). In the absence of a randomized control trial, pulmonary metastasectomy is commonly performed in an effort to improve survival. However, data from retrospective analysis and case series remain subject to selection bias. The aim of this study was to review the published data, especially to identify prognostic factors, to inform future clinical practice in the field of pulmonary metastasectomy for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. We searched the SCOPUS database using the terms "pulmonary metastasectomy" or "lung resection" or "lung metastasectomy" or lung metastasectomies" and sarcoma and survival in the title, abstract, and keywords of all documents. Over the study period (1976-June 2021), a total of 438 documents of published articles were retrieved and 192 were identified for bibliometric analysis, and of those, 128 articles were included in the content analysis. No randomized trial was identified. 'Bradford's law' was applied to classify journals into 'zones' and 6 journals appeared to publish 70/192 (36.4%) of all articles, receiving 52% of the citations. The vast majority of articles 64% were retrospective cohort analyses. A total of 49 articles reported on prognostic factors. Pulmonary metastasectomy is frequently performed for lung metastases originating from STS. The literature continues to evolve in the form of retrospective cohort studies. It is important to review and utilize the prognostic factors to identify patients for pulmonary metastasectomy to enhance the survival outcome.

The Assessment of Prognostic Factors for Lung Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Previously Resected Liver Metastases

The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic factors of lung metastasectomy in patients with previously resected liver metastases. Thirty-three patients underwent complete resection of lung metastases after previous liver metastasectomy from colorectal cancer between January 2004 and December 2013. In univariate analyses, all cumulative survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences in variables were evaluated using the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The 5-year survival rate of all 33 patients after lung metastasectomy was 31%. Univariate analysis identified 2 significant prognostic factors: preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level (P = 0.035) and maximum tumor size (P = 0.029). Subgroup analysis with a combination of these 2 independent prognostic factors revealed 2-year survival rates of 100%, 92.3%, and 0% for patients with 0, 1, and 2 risk factors, respectively. We identified 2 independent poor prognostic factors for pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with previously resected liver metastases: high serum carcinoembryonic antigen level before lung metastasectomy, and maximum size of lung metastases. When these 2 factors are combined, higher- and lower-risk subgroups can be identified, which may help select patients with previously resected liver metastases who benefit most from lung metastasectomy.

Clinical Factors Predictive of a Better Prognosis of Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The lung is the most common site of extrahepatic metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors for pulmonary metastasectomy of HCC. One hundred three patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for HCC between January 2005 and December 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Patient demographic data and characteristics of the primary tumors and pulmonary metastasis were investigated to identify factors significantly correlated with prognosis. Of 103 patients, 75 (72.8%) had 1 site pulmonary metastasis, 22 (21.4%) had 2, and 6 (5.8%) had 3 or more. Liver recurrence at the time of pulmonary metastasectomy was noted in 34 patients. The estimated 5-year overall survival rate was 38.5% after pulmonary metastasectomy. Univariate prognostic analysis showed that liver recurrence at the time of pulmonary metastasectomy, extent of resection, laterality of pulmonary metastasis, tumor location, number of metastatic sites, and metastatic tumor size were significantly associated with favorable overall survival after pulmonary metastasectomy. Multivariate analysis revealed that liver recurrence at the time of pulmonary metastasectomy and the number of metastatic sites wereindependent prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis with a combination of these 2 independent prognostic factors revealed 5-year overall survival rates for patients with 0, 1, and 2 risk factors of 58.5%, 23.8%, and 0.0%, respectively. Pulmonary metastasectomy is a safe and effective treatment for well-selected patients with pulmonary metastasis of HCC. Liver recurrence at the time of pulmonary metastasectomy and the number of metastatic sites were identified as independent prognostic factors. The number of risk factors significantly influenced patient survival.

Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of pulmonary metastasectomy for osteosarcoma and soft tissue sarcoma.

The prognostic factors of pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with osteosarcoma and soft tissue sarcoma remain controversial. The purpose of our analysis was to explore the prognostic factors and outcomes of patients with osteosarcoma and soft tissue sarcoma who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy at our institution. We reviewed the data of 44 patients who underwent resection of pulmonary metastases from 1996 to 2016at our institution. The Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and multivariate Cox hazard model were used for comparison and survival analyses. There was no perioperative mortality. The median post-metastasectomy overall survival was 24.8 months, and the 5-year overall survival rate of all patients was 43.5%. The 5-year survival rate of the patients who underwent repeat thoracotomies was 60.0%. Incomplete resection, a largest tumor size > 2cm and a disease-free interval < 12months were associated with poor survival in multivariate analyses. Among eight patients, who underwent repeat pulmonary resection, two remain alive with no evidence of disease. These patients had the longest DFI and DFI-2 (time from first pulmonary metastasectomy to the diagnosis of recurrent pulmonary metastasis), respectively. The survival of patients with a relatively long disease-free interval, small tumor size and complete resection was favorable following the treatment of osteosarcoma and soft tissue sarcoma with pulmonary metastasectomy. Repeat pulmonary metastasectomies also provide favorable prognosis in select patients.

Long-Term Survival and Prognostic Factors of Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Lung is the most common extrahepatic metastatic organ of liver cancer. Surgical resection is a common local treatment for pulmonary metastasis. But the long-term prognosis of pulmonary metastasectomy varies greatly due to the small sample size and different results of previous studies. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the combined 5-year overall survival (OS) rate and prognostic factors after pulmonary metastasectomy in liver cancer. Key words such as liver cancer pulmonary metastasis and metastasectomy were retrieved firstly in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Chinese Wanfang databases. Eligible studies were identified by manual searches. Each included study should report 5-year OS rate and/or prognostic factors of pulmonary metastasectomy. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment, and heterogeneity was estimated by I2. We calculated the combined 5-year survival rates and determined the prognostic factors for OS by the hazard ratios (HR) and number of events. Seventeen cohort studies with a total of 513 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The combined 5-year survival rates after pulmonary metastasectomy were 33% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 29-37%]. The poor prognostic factors were disease-free interval (DFI)<12months (HR=2.421 95% CI 1.384 4.236) and existence of cirrhosis (HR=1.936 95% CI 1.031 3.636). The 5-year OS rate of patients with pulmonary metastasectomy after resection of primary liver cancer is 33%. DFI<12months and existence of cirrhosis are probably poor prognostic factors.

Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of pulmonary metastasectomy in breast cancer patients: a systematic review

Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of pulmonary metastasectomy in breast cancer patients: a systematic review

Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma: a High Volume Academic Institution Experience

背景与目的肺是骨与软组织肉瘤最常见的远隔转移脏器，肺转移严重影响患者长期生存。肺转移瘤切除术有助于改善预后，然而对其临床地位、适应证及预后影响因素的认识目前仍存在争议。由于发病率较低难以开展随机对照研究，同时国际单中心大宗病例回顾研究也极为罕见，国内尚无类似报道。本研究旨在回顾本组单中心大样本肺转移性骨与软组织肉瘤的外科治疗结果，并且对预后影响因素进行分析。方法2007年1月-2015年12月期间，经病理确诊为骨与软组织肉瘤，已在多学科综合治疗框架下完成原发病灶根治性切除，并且至少经过1次肺转移瘤切除术的所有患者均纳入分析。收集相关临床变量，运用Cox风险比例回归法进行单因素及多因素分析寻找与预后影响因素。结果144例骨与软组织肉瘤患者符合纳入标准，总共行155次肺转移瘤切除术。多因素分析结果提示非R0切除、无病间期 < 1年、肺转移灶数目≥3枚、肺转移灶的长径总和≥45 mm均是预后的独立危险因素。结论积极行肺转移瘤外科治疗有助于改善转移性骨与软组织肉瘤患者的长期预后。R0切除，无病间期时间较长，转移瘤数目较少及长径总和较小是本组患者良好的预后因素。

Long-Term Results and Prognostic Factors of Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Patients with Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma.

Objective We wanted to assess the prognostic factors and the efficacy of the treatment in patients who underwent lung resections for transitional cell carcinoma metastases. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective, multicenter study. Between January 1995 and May 2014, 69 patients underwent lung metastasectomy with curative intent. We evaluated primary site of the tumor, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy after urological operation, disease-free interval (DFI; lower or higher than 24 months), type of lung resection, number of lung metastases, presence of metastatic lymph nodes, and diameter of the metastasis (less or more than 3 cm). Results Among 69 patients, 55 (79%) had bladder as primary site of disease and 12 of them received a transurethral bladder resection. Fourteen (21%) patients developed primary tumor in the renal pelvis or ureter; 53 (76%) patients presented with a single metastasis, 16 (24%) with multiple metastasis. The median DFI was 37 months and the median follow-up was 50 months. Sampling lymphadenectomy was done in 42 patients and nodal metastases were found in 7 patients. The overall 5-year survival was 52%, median 62 months. At univariate analysis, the DFI had a significant impact on survival (5-year survival of 58% for patients with DFI ≥ 24 months vs. 46%; p = 0.048) and diameter of metastasis (5-year survival of 59% for diameter less than 3 cm group vs. 33%; p = 0.001). The multivariate analysis confirmed metastasis' diameter as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.001). Conclusion Our study found that, in addition to DFI that remains a common prognostic factor in patients with metastatic lung disease, in lung metastases by transitional cell carcinoma, the diameter of the lesion is another significant prognostic factor.

Prognostic factors for resection of isolated pulmonary metastases in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lung is a common organ of metastases in patients with primary breast cancer. Pulmonary metastasis of primary breast cancer is usually considered as a systemic disease, however, the systemic approaches have achieved little progress in terms of prolonging survival time. In contrast, some studies revealed a probable survival benefit of pulmonary metastasectomy for such patients. However, the prognostic factor for pulmonary metastasectomy in breast cancer patients is still a controversial issue. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies to assess the pooled 5-year overall survival (OS) rate and the prognostic factors for pulmonary metastasectomy from breast cancer. An electronic search in MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE (via OVID), CENTRAL (via Cochrane Library), and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM) complemented by manual searches in article references were conducted to identify eligible studies. All cohort studies in which survival and/or prognostic factors for pulmonary metastasectomy from breast cancer were reported were included in the analysis. We calculated the pooled 5-year survival rates, identified the prognostic factors for OS and combined the hazard ratios (HRs) of the identified prognostic factors. Sixteen studies with a total of 1937 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled 5-year survival rates after pulmonary metastasectomy was 46% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 43-49%]. The poor prognostic factors were disease-free interval (DFI) (<3 years) with HR =1.70 (95% CI: 1.37-2.10), resection of metastases (incomplete) with HR =2.06 (95% CI: 1.63-2.62), No. of pulmonary metastases (>1) with HR =1.31 (95% CI: 1.13-1.50) and the hormone receptor status of metastases (negative) with HR =2.30 (95% CI: 1.43-3.70). Surgery with a relatively high 5-year OS rate after pulmonary metastasectomy (46%), may be a promising treatment for pulmonary metastases in the breast cancer patients with a good performance status and limited disease. The main poor prognostic factors were DFI (<3 years), resection of metastases (incomplete), No. of pulmonary metastasis (>1) and hormone receptor status of metastases (negative). And prospective randomized trials will be needed to address these issues in the future.

Resection of subsequent pulmonary metastases from treated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pulmonary metastasectomy involves the surgical removal of pulmonary nodules. It is a recognised therapeutic modality for the treatment of metastatic disease. There is no consensus as to the role of pulmonary metastasectomy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The objective of this study was to determine whether, in selected patients, resection of subsequent pulmonary metastases prolongs survival in patients already treated for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and to identify independent risk factors that influence 5-year survival of patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy. A systematic review of English and non-English articles using MEDLINE (1950-present), EMBASE (1980-present), NHS evidence and Cochrane databases. Search terms included but were not limited to: squamous cell carcinoma, pulmonary metastasectomy or resection, head and neck cancer, malignancy or tumour. Studies examining outcomes for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for metachronous pulmonary metastases were included. Independent data extraction of articles by two trained researchers using predefined data fields was performed. Thirteen of 47 studies (all retrospective) fulfilled eligibility criteria, with a total of 403 patients. In total, 11 papers reported 5-year survival rates (Kaplan-Meier) in 387 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma following pulmonary metastasectomy. Meta-analysis of survival data showed an overall absolute 5-year survival rate of 29.1% for patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for metachronous metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Two papers reported significantly worse 5-year survival rates in patients with oral head and neck squamous cell carcinoma compared with other sites (9.2% versus 32.4%, P < 0.001 and 15.4% versus 45.2%, P = 0.01). Two papers reported that the presence of cervical lymph node metastases at diagnosis of the primary tumour significantly worsened 5-year survival rates following pulmonary metastasectomy (13.8% (N+) versus 32% (N0) P = 0.01 and 24% (N+) versus 60% (N0) P = 0.025). Other significant poor prognostic factors included incomplete pulmonary resection and the presence of multiple pulmonary nodules. This systematic review provides level 2a evidence of the effectiveness of pulmonary metastasectomy for metachronous pulmonary metastases from head and neck squamous carcinoma, which may offer prolonged survival for selected patients. Poor prognostic factors for pulmonary metastasectomy in this cohort of patients include the presence of lymph node metastasis at the diagnosis of the original tumour, squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, incomplete pulmonary resection and the presence of multiple pulmonary nodules.

骨軟部肉腫肺転移の治療成績と予後因子解析

骨軟部肉腫は肺に転移することが多く，その治療は予後を左右する重要な因子である．2002年9月から2013年12月の間に，当院で骨軟部肉腫肺転移に対し肺切除を施行した36例を対象とし，その治療成績を評価し，予後因子の検討を行なった．骨軟部肉腫全体の術後成績は5年生存率65.7％で，疾患別では骨肉腫と軟部肉腫はそれぞれ63.6％と67.1％であった．予後因子の解析では，肺転移切除時の年齢が若年者群（45歳未満vs. 45歳以上）で有意に成績が良好であった（5年生存率92.3％vs. 44.3％，p=0.03）．その他，有意差はないものの術式が楔状切除，DFIが12ヵ月以上，原発巣治療後の初回再発部位が肺の症例は成績が良好な傾向が認められた．肺転移切除時年齢，術式，DFI，原発巣治療後の初回再発部位が予後因子となる可能性があり，手術適応の判断基準になりうると思われた．

Survival impact of pulmonary metastasectomy for patients with head and neck cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival impact and prognostic factors of pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with pulmonary metastasis from head and neck cancer. A retrospective study of 69 patients was analyzed. Twenty-four patients (35%) underwent pulmonary metastasectomy, and the remaining 45 patients (65%) were treated with chemotherapy or best supportive care. The 1-year overall survival (OS) of 69 patients was 28%. Pulmonary metastasectomy (p = .01) and histology (p < .001) had a significant impact on the prognosis. One-year OS of patients who underwent metastasectomy and those who did not was 90% and 35%, respectively. In the metastasectomy group, recurrence of primary ahead of lung metastasis (p = .006) and disease-free interval (DFI; ≤21.4 months; p = .046) were significant negative prognostic factors. Pulmonary metastasectomy has an impact on survival in carefully selected patients, especially for those with a long DFI and with no recurrence of primary cancer ahead of lung metastasis.

Prognostic Factors for Pulmonary Metastasectomy in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This study aimed to present our experience with pulmonary metastasectomy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and to evaluate the prognostic factors. The clinicopathologic data of 17 patients including presence of viral hepatitis, the serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, the number of metastases, and laterality were analyzed. The overall survival rates and the prognostic factors were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model for multivariate analysis. The median follow-up periods after pulmonary resection and initial hepatic resection were 28.9 and 46.2 months, respectively. The actuarial overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates after pulmonary metastasectomy were 64.7 +/- 11.6%, 29.4 +/- 11.1%, and 11.8 +/- 7.8%, respectively. Using multivariate analysis, disease-free interval (DFI) of more than 24 months (hazard ratio = 2.36, 95% confidence interval = 1.33-25.33, p = 0.020) and AFP levels after pulmonary resection (hazard ratio = 51.3 95% confidence interval = 3.68-716.66, p = 0.003) were found to be independent prognostic factors. Although only a small number of patients were enrolled in this study, a disease-free interval more than 24 months and the serum AFP level after pulmonary metastasectomy might be important prognostic factors.

Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Pulmonary Metastases of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas

The lung is the major organ for distant metastasis from head and neck cancers, and pulmonary metastasectomy is indicated for selected cases. The efficacy of surgical treatment for pulmonary metastatic lesions from head and neck cancers has not been thoroughly examined. The database developed by the Metastatic Lung Tumor Study Group of Japan was retrospectively reviewed. Between November 1980 and September 2006, 237 patients underwent resection of pulmonary metastases from primary head and neck cancers. After excluding nonsquamous cell carcinomas, 114 cases were analyzed, and the survival and prognostic factors for pulmonary metastasectomy for metastases from head and neck cancers were determined. The overall 5-year survival rate after pulmonary metastasectomy was 26.5%, and the median survival time was 26 months. As determined by univariate analysis, poor prognostic factors were oral cavity cancers, lymph node metastasis, a disease-free interval of 24 months or less, and incomplete resection. Multivariate analysis revealed that poor prognostic factors were being male, having oral cavity cancers, lymph node metastasis, and incomplete resection. When patients were divided into males with oral cavity cancers (n = 17) and all others (n = 97), the 5-year survival rates were 0% and 31.6%, respectively. Survival of male patients with oral cavity cancer that metastasized was significantly reduced (p < 0.001). Male sex, oral cavity cancers, lymph node metastasis, and incomplete resection were poor prognostic factors for pulmonary metastases, but there is the potential for a good surgical outcome in carefully selected patients.