Profunda Artery Perforator Flap Research Articles

Breast reconstruction using the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap: Technical refinements and evolution, outcomes, and patient satisfaction based on 116 consecutive flaps

When a deep inferior epigastric artery flap is not suitable, the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap can be a good alternative for autologous breast reconstruction. Popularity of the PAP flap is expanding, but it is still only slowly being adopted worldwide. We report our experience with 116 consecutive PAP flaps showing refinements and evolution of the technique towards improvement in outcomes and patients' satisfaction. We prospectively collected data from consecutive PAP flap breast reconstructions performed from 2016 to 2019. Patients' demographics, pre-, intra-, postoperative data, and revision procedures were analyzed. The BREAST-Q and a specific questionnaire investigating outcomes at the donor site were completed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. One-hundred and sixteen PAP flaps were performed in 86 patients, 64 unilateral and 22 bilateral breast reconstructions. Mean body mass index was 24.72kg/m2 (range 18.9-29.2) and mean flap weight was 251.30g (range 152-455g). Complications included donor site hematoma (1.7%), seroma (2.6%), fat necrosis (1.7%), and wound dehiscence (2.6%). No arterial/venous thrombosis nor flap losses were recorded. Patients reported high satisfaction in all BREAST-Q domains, with mean postoperative scores being higher than preoperative ones, suggesting a positive effect in quality of life and satisfaction. Scores were significant in the satisfaction with breast domain (p=0.0016). Breast reconstruction with PAP flap yields a high success, low complications, and excellent cosmetic outcomes in the breast and donor sites. It improves patients' satisfaction and quality of life; hence, it can be considered an excellent option for autologous breast reconstruction.

Inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) flap versus profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap as an alternative option for free autologous breast reconstruction

When patients are unsuitable for deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction, the inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) flap has been used as an alternative option. However, the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap is also gaining popularity as an alternative to the DIEP flap for several reasons. This retrospective cohort study compares baseline characteristics, peri- and post-operative outcomes following IGAP flap and PAP flap breast reconstructions after mastectomy for cancer. In a single center in the UK, from September 2008 through December 2016, 43 women underwent IGAP Flap(s) breast reconstruction and 51 received PAP flap(s) breast reconstructions. Statistical analysis was performed to compare baseline, peri-operative and post-operative variables between the two reconstruction methods. Perioperative complications requiring reoperation were experienced in women undergoing IGAP flap breast reconstructions only (21% versus 0%, p=0.001), principally due to the risk of total flap failure (12% versus 0%, p=0.01). Women undergoing IGAP flap breast reconstructions were at significantly higher odds of revision surgery (OR 17 [95% CI: 5.5-53], p<0.001), which was unchanged after adjusting for bilateral reconstructions (adjusted OR 18 [95% CI: 5.3-58], p<0.001). PAP flaps appear to be associated with significantly fewer complications and revision surgeries than IGAP flaps for breast reconstruction in women undergoing mastectomy for cancer and who are unsuitable for a DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Anatomic study of the profunda artery perforators by multidetector CT scanner and clinical use of the banana-shaped flap design for breast reconstruction.

The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap is a well-known free flap for breast reconstruction. However, a reproducible perforator mapping system has yet to be developed. The PAP perforators were localized by CTA using a novel X-Y axis system. Flap dimensions were based on the CTA images and localized PAP-perforators. Perioperative findings and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. A total of 70 lower limbs and 180 PAP perforators were evaluated. An average of 2.78 ± 1.22 and 2.22 ± 0.96 perforators were seen, in the right and left legs, respectively, and were divided in five clusters (PAP1-PAP5) based on their location on the Y-axis. The course of the perforators was noted as well as the average diameter at the origin. The overall average diameter was 1.99 ± 0.86 mm. A banana-shaped PAP-flap was harvested in 10 patients. The mean operative time was 278 min, pedicle length 76 ± 12 mm, and mean flap weight 247 g. No major complications were seen. The PAP flap can be mapped by CTA in a reproducible way. The X and Y axes are based on fixed anatomic landmarks and may form the basis for a banana-shaped flap design of the PAP-flap.

Perineal Reconstruction With the Profunda Artery Perforator Flap.

Abdominoperineal resection is used to treat a variety of colorectal pathologies. Traditionally, the vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap has been most commonly used for reconstruction. Here, we explore the role of the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap for perineal reconstruction. A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively analyzed to identify patients who had undergone perineal reconstruction with a pedicled PAP flap. Parameters of interest included age, sex, body mass index, primary diagnosis, comorbidities, and history of radiation, and postoperative complications. Fifteen patients (5 men and 10 women) with a median age of 52 years (interquartile range, 48.5-61.5 years) were included in the study. Median body mass index was 26.3 kg/m2 (interquartile range, 24.0-29.3 kg/m2). Patients underwent abdominoperineal resection for treatment of rectal cancer (n = 9, 60.0%), recurrent anal squamous cell carcinoma (n = 3, 20.0%), and Crohn's disease (n = 3, 20.0%). Twelve patients (80.0%) underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Eight patients (53.3%) experienced a total of 10 complications (2 major and 8 minor). The most common complication was donor (n = 3, 20.0%)/recipient (n = 3, 20.0%) site wound dehiscence. Stable soft tissue coverage was achieved in all patients. The PAP flap provides stable soft tissue coverage of perineal defects with a low donor-site morbidity. This flap should be strongly considered in the reconstructive algorithm when approaching perineal defects.

Utility of ERAS Pathway in Nonabdominal-Based Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: Efficacy in PAP Flap Reconstruction?

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are effective in decreasing hospital length of stay and inpatient opioid consumption. Implementation of these protocols in abdominally based breast reconstruction has been successful. When a patient is a poor candidate for abdominally based flaps a popular secondary option is the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap. We present our experience with implementation of our ERAS protocol in patients treated with PAP flaps for breast reconstruction. Retrospective review of patients treated with autologous breast reconstruction using PAP flaps before and after ERAS implementation were performed. Patient characteristics, postoperative oral morphine equivalents (OMEs), and flap data were collected. A total of 87 patients were included in this study (58 patients in pre-ERAS and 29 patients in ERAS group). There was no statistical difference in patient age, comorbidities, smoking, and radiation between two groups. The ERAS group had statistically lower hospital length of stay (2.6 vs. 3.8 days), procedure time (315 vs. 433 minutes), postoperative day 0 (54.8 vs. 96.3), postoperative day 1 (29.9 vs. 57.7), and total opioid consumption (103.7 vs. 192.1). There was no statistical difference in average pain scores between two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that procedure time significantly increased the amount of opioid consumption while ERAS implementation significantly reduced LOS and opioid consumption. Use of an ERAS protocol in PAP flap breast reconstruction has not been previously studied. Our work shows that ERAS implementation in PAP flap breast reconstruction significantly reduces inpatient opioid use and length of hospital stay.

Use of the Vertical Profunda Artery Perforator Flap to Capture the Dominant Perforator: A Cadaver Dissection and Imaging Study.

While the originally described transverse profunda artery perforator (tPAP) flap is designed to capture the first profunda perforator, our group hypothesized the dominant perforator may not always be captured in this configuration. This study maps the location of dominant profunda perforators using imaging and cadaveric dissections to determine the probability of capturing dominant perforators with the transverse flap design versus the vertical PAP (vPAP) variant. Fifty preoperative magnetic resonance angiogram or computed tomographic angiogram scans (100 total extremities) were examined from autologous breast reconstruction patients between 2015 and 2019. Profunda perforator characteristics that were examined included the distance from the pubic tubercle to the infragluteal fold (IGF), the distance of the perforators from the IGF, distance posterior to the gracilis, the diameter of the perforator at fascial exit, and total number of perforators present. Profunda perforator dissection was performed in 18 cadaveric extremities. Analysis included mean distance from pubic tubercle, distance posterior to the gracilis, diameter at fascial exit, and total number of perforators. In imaging analysis, the mean distance from the IGF to the fascial exit of all dominant perforators was 7.04 cm. The mean diameter of the dominant perforator at the fascial exit was 2.61 mm. Twenty-six thighs (26%) demonstrated dominant perforators that exited the fascia greater than 8 cm below the IGF. In cadaver dissections, the mean distance from the pubic tubercle to the fascial exit of all the dominant perforators was 10.17 cm. Nine cadaver specimens (50%) demonstrated perforators that exited the fascia greater than 8 cm below the estimated IGF. The dominant perforator can often be missed in the traditional tPAP design. The vPAP incorporates multiple perforators with a long pedicle, excellent vessel diameter, and favorable donor-site.

4: Four-flap Breast Reconstruction: Assessing Breast-q And Donor Site Morbidity In Bilateral Stacked Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Purpose:Patients undergoing bilateral autologous breast reconstruction may benefit from increased flap volume using bilateral stacked deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and profunda artery perforator (PAP) flaps. Four-flap reconstruction patients are a unique population in which to compare donor site morbidity of the two most commonly used free flaps in breast reconstruction (DIEP and PAP). Our aim was to characterize the donor site morbidity and overall patient outcomes of four-flap breast reconstruction patients.Methods:Retrospective chart review was performed for all patients undergoing four-flap breast reconstruction by two surgeons between 2014-2019 at a single academic medical center. Inpatient surgical site pain location and pain scores by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) were recorded during the immediate post-operative admission. All patients were contacted to complete the BREAST-Q reconstructive module and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Four-flap BREAST-Q scores were compared to bilateral DIEP and to bilateral PAP patients as reference populations.Results:A total of 63 patients undergoing four-flap breast reconstruction were identified. BREAST-Q (n=38) scores demonstrated mean Satisfaction With Breasts of 66.1+/-32.2, Psychosocial Well-Being 70.8+/-34.3, Sexual Well-Being 44.5+/-36.5, Physical Well-Being Chest 72.8+/-32.5, and Physical Well-Being Abdomen 63.6+/-34.9. In comparison to bilateral DIEP (n=180), and bilateral PAP reconstruction patients (n=43), four-flap BREAST-Q scores were similar. No difference in BREAST-Q scores remained after matching four-flap patients to bilateral DIEP patients by Age, Race, BMI, Zip Code, and radiation history. With regard to donor site morbidity, mean instances of donor site pain location recorded at the abdomen (9.72, 95%CI[7.78-11.66]) were significantly higher than the thigh (2.82, 95%CI[1.63-4.00]) during the post-operative admission (p=<0.0001). Mean pain scores by NPRS were similar between abdomen, thigh, and breast surgical sites. Subjective survey data revealed more donor site pain at the PAP site, a patient preference for the DIEP donor site, and easier post-operative care for the DIEP donor site. Further, a majority of patients felt the thighs were aesthetically improved post-operatively (54.29%). Long term survey outcomes from the LEFS (n=35) demonstrated a mean score of 92.4% (SD 10.9). The majority of women would make the same decision for four flap breast reconstruction (81.82%).Conclusion:This is the largest consecutive series of four-flap breast reconstruction outcomes reported to date. Patients undergoing four-flap breast reconstruction have more immediate donor site pain at the abdomen than the thigh, but more thigh pain after discharge home once ambulating. BREAST-Q scores in four-flap patients demonstrate overall high patient satisfaction that is similar to both bilateral DIEP and bilateral PAP reconstruction patients. In patients who require increased flap volume for body appropriate breast reconstruction, four-flap reconstruction is comparable to bilateral DIEP and bilateral PAP by BREAST-Q scores.

The Profunda Artery Perforator Flap: A Versatile Option for Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Although the profunda artery perforator flap has gained popularity in breast reconstruction, it has not been well described for reconstruction of head and neck defects. The authors report their experience with free profunda artery perforator flaps in postoncologic head and neck reconstruction. A retrospective review of all free profunda artery perforator flaps used for head and neck reconstruction from 2016 to 2019 was performed. Overall, 61 profunda artery perforator flap reconstructions were performed: 45 single independent flaps, 12 in conjunction with a second free flap, and four in combination with two other free flaps. The profunda artery perforator flaps were most commonly used for reconstruction of the tongue (n = 19), cheek (n = 11), parotid (n = 10), and maxilla (n = 6). The profunda artery perforator flaps averaged 7.1 × 12.1 × 1.9 cm, with a mean pedicle length of 11.5 cm. The A, B, and C perforators were located at mean distances of 7.4 cm (range, 4 to 11.5 cm), 11.7 cm (range, 8 to 18 cm), and 16.1 cm (range, 14 to 20.5 cm) from the pubic tubercle along the axis of the adductor longus muscle and 7.9 cm (range, 7 to 11cm), 7.6 cm (range, 7 to 15.5 cm), and 7.2 cm (range, 6 to 16 cm) posterior and perpendicular to the axis. There were three partial flap losses. Eight patients (13 percent) had recipient-site complications necessitating operative intervention: four for vascular compromise of the profunda artery perforator flap, two for hematoma evacuation, and two for infection. Donor-site complications were noted in seven patients (11 percent), two of whom required operative intervention. The profunda artery perforator flap is a versatile and reliable flap with consistent anatomy and a low complication rate. The profunda artery perforator flap seems to be a reasonable alternative for reconstruction of head and neck defects. Therapeutic, IV.

The profunda artery perforator free flap for lower extremity reconstruction.

The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has been reported in several types of reconstructions. This report aims to evaluate the usefulness and the clinical outcome of patients who underwent the PAP free flap for lower limb reconstruction. Between February 2018 and February 2020, nine patients with injury at lower third of the leg, foot dorsum or foot plant (eight acute injuries and one chronic ulcer) were selected. Mean wound size was 12.5 × 6.3cm (9 × 5-14.5 × 6.5). Inclusion criteria consisted in patient's request to hide the donor site scar and the absence of previous traumas or surgery in the donor site. Patients considered unable to bear prolonged surgery were excluded. Patients underwent preoperative CT angiography and peri-operative Doopler, for perforator selection. All flaps were designed with pinch test, in elliptical shape. Microvascular anastomosis was performed to the tibialis anterior/posterior or medial plantar vessels. Outcomes were evaluated in terms of wound coverage success and patient's quality of life through Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) questionnaire. The mean size of the harvested skin paddle was 13.5 × 7.4cm (9 × 6-15 × 8) and mean pedicle length was 8.5cm. Mean flap harvest time was 43.5min (35-55). Flap survival rate was 100%, with one re-exploration with minimal partial flap loss. Mean follow-up was 13.5months . Reconstructive results were successful in wound coverage and function. All patients reported satisfaction with their result by LEFS questionnaire (score:64.7). With proper patient selection, there was 100% flap survival rate with no major complication. According to our data, the PAP free flap could be a valuable option for lower extremity reconstruction.

The Conjoined TUGPAP Flap for Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Illustrative Anatomy.

Background:Although abdominally based flaps continue to be the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction, alternative donor sites are necessary when the abdominal region is unavailable or inadequate for flap harvest. In this case, thigh-based flaps, such as the profunda artery perforator (PAP), transverse upper gracilis (TUG), or newly described TUGPAP, are thought to be reliable with low morbidity and satisfactory cosmesis. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of breast reconstruction with PAP, TUG, or TUGPAP, and present anatomy and surgical techniques through illustrative examples.Methods:A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Articles were included if they used a PAP, TUG, or TUGPAP flap for oncologic, traumatic, or congenital breast reconstruction in patients 18 years or older.Results:Forty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. Seven hundred five patients underwent 906 breast reconstructions with 1037 flaps (755 TUG, 230 PAP, and 52 TUGPAP). Mean patient age was 45.9 years. The mean flap weight for TUG, PAP, and TUGPAP flaps were 323.4, 346.9, and 437.0 g, respectively. The most common recipient vessel was the internal mammary artery in 821 flaps. The overall flap survival rate was 97.2% (1008/1037). TUG flaps had a significantly higher recipient and donor complication rate compared with both PAP (recipient: 18.1% versus 7.8%, P = 0.0001; donor: 25.8% versus 7.0%, P < 0.00001) and TUGPAP flaps (recipient: 18.1% versus 2.0%, P < 0.001; donor: 25.8% versus 7.7%, P < 0.01).Conclusion:The TUGPAP flap is a safe and effective alternative for autologous breast reconstruction when the abdominal donor site is unavailable.

The PAP Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Practical Option for Slim Patients.

The posterior thigh-based profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has been an emerging option as a secondary choice in breast reconstructions. However, whether a PAP flap could consistently serve as the secondary option in slim patients has not been investigated. Records of immediate unilateral breast reconstructions performed from May 2017 to June 2019 were reviewed. PAP flap breast reconstructions were compared with standard deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions, and were grouped into single or stacked PAP flaps for further analysis. Overall, 43 PAP flaps were performed to reconstruct 32 breasts. Eleven patients underwent stacked PAP flap reconstruction, while 17 patients underwent 21 single PAP flap reconstruction. The average body mass index (BMI) of the patients was 22.2 ± 0.5 kg/m2. The results were as follows: no total loss, one case of venous congestion (2.3%), two donor site wound dehiscence cases (4.7%), and one case of fat necrosis from partial flap loss (2.3%). When compared with 192 DIEP flap reconstructions, the final DIEP flap supplied 98.1 ± 1.7% of mastectomy weight, while the final PAP flap supplied 114.1 ± 6.2% of mastectomy weight (p < 0.005), demonstrating that PAP flaps can successfully supply final reconstruction volume. In a separate analysis, single PAP flaps successfully supplied 104.2% (84.2-144.4%) of mastectomy weights, while stacked PAP flaps supplied 103.7% (98.8-115.2%) of mastectomy weights. In our series of PAP flap reconstructions performed in low-to-normal BMI patients, we found that PAP flaps, as single or stacked flaps, provide sufficient volume to reconstruct mastectomy defects.

Redefining the Reconstructive Ladder in Vulvoperineal Reconstruction: The Role of Pedicled Perforator Flaps.

Gynecological reconstruction is difficult, particularly in cases with recurrence and received previous surgeries and/or radiotherapy and necessitate secondary reconstruction. Perforator flaps can preserve other donor sites for potential later reconstruction, and they also can be better tailored to the defect. We hypothesized that the use of perforator-based flaps can better restore the defect with less complications. A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent vulvar-perineum reconstruction between 2011 and 2018 by the senior author, and oncologic and reconstructive outcomes and complications were analyzed. Thirty-three patients underwent 55 soft tissue reconstructions for vulvar-perineum defects during the study period. The mean follow-up time was 27.6 ± 28.9 months. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common cancer (45.5%). For 11 patients (33.3%), the procedures were performed for the treatment of recurrent cancer. The average defect size was 39.8 ± 34.3 cm2. The overall survival rate was 90.3%. Profunda artery perforator flaps were the most commonly applied flap for reconstruction in both the primary and recurrent groups. Poor wound healing was the most common complication which occurred in 10 of the 55 flaps (18.2%). Perforator flaps presented fewer complications than myocutaneous flaps or traditional random flaps. Similarly, Island pedicle flap design also presented fewer complications than traditional rotation flaps. With proper reconstruction, previous surgery or radiotherapy did not contribute to an increase in complications. In our experience, perforator flaps can provide satisfactory reconstruction for perineum reconstruction with low postoperative complications while preserving other donor sites in the event of disease recurrence for repeat resection and reconstruction. Previous surgery or radiotherapy did not increase the complications or preclude its usage. A redefined reconstructive ladder was created to help selecting the best state-of-the-art technique for reconstruction to achieve better results.

The combined use of pedicled profunda artery perforator and bilateral gracilis flaps for pelvic reconstruction: A cohort study

The result of an extra-levator abdominoperineal excisionof the rectum (ELAPE) is a composite three-dimensional defect. This is performed for locally advanced anorectal cancer, and may involve partial excision of the vagina. The aim of reconstruction is to achieve wound healing, restore the pelvic floor and to allow micturition and sexual function. We aim to evaluate the concurrent use of profunda artery perforator (PAP) and bilateral gracilis flaps for vaginal and pelvic floor reconstruction. We performed a retrospective case note review of patients undergoing pelvo-perineal reconstruction with combined gracilis and PAP flaps between July 2018 and December 2019. Eighteen pedicled flaps were performed on six patients with anal or vulval malignancies. All underwent pre-operative radiotherapy. Four patients had extended abdominoperineal tumour resections, while two patients underwent total pelvic exenteration. The median age was 57 (range 47-74) years, inpatient stay was 22 (11-47) days and the follow-up was 10 (5-21) months. Four patients developed partial perineal wound dehiscence, of which one was re-sutured. One patient had a post-operative bleed requiring radiological embolisation of an internal iliac branch and had subsequent 1cm PAP flap loss. All other flaps survived completely. Median time to heal was 4 (1-6) months. This is the first series reporting combined bilateral gracilis and PAP flaps for pelvic reconstruction. The wound dehiscence rate and healing times were expected in the context of irradiation and radical pelvic tumour resection. This is a reliable technique for perineal and vaginal reconstruction with minimal donor site morbidity.

The Chimeric Gracilis and Profunda Artery Perforator Flap: Characterizing This Novel Flap Configuration with Angiography and a Cadaveric Model.

A chimerically configured gracilis and profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap is highly prevalent based on recent computed tomography (CT)-imaging data. The purpose of this study is to further characterize the vascular anatomy of this novel flap configuration and determine the feasibility of flap dissection. To characterize flap arterial anatomy, lower extremity CT angiograms performed from 2011 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. To characterize venous anatomy and determine the feasibility of flap harvest, the lower extremities of cadavers were evaluated. A total of 974 lower extremity CT angiograms and 32 cadavers were included for the assessment. Of the 974 CT angiograms, majority (966, 99%) were bilateral studies, yielding a total of 1,940 lower extremities (right-lower-extremity = 970 and left-lower-extremity = 970) for radiographic evaluation. On CT angiography, a chimerically configured gracilis and PAP flap was found in 51% of patients (n = 494/974). By laterality, chimeric anatomy was present in 26% of right lower extremities (n = 254/970) and 25% of left lower extremities (n = 240/970); bilateral chimeric anatomy was found in 12% (n = 112/966) of patients. Average length of the common arterial pedicle feeding both gracilis and PAP flap perforasomes was 31.1 ± 16.5 mm (range = 2.0-95.0 mm) with an average diameter of 2.8 ± 0.7 mm (range = 1.3-8.8 mm).A total of 15 cadavers exhibited chimeric anatomy with intact, conjoined arteries and veins allowing for anatomical tracing from the profunda femoris to the distal branches within the tissues of the medial thigh. Dissection and isolation of the common pedicle and distal vessels was feasible with minimal disruption of adjacent tissues. Chimeric flap venous anatomy was favorable, with vena commitante adjacent to the common pedicle in all specimens. Dissection of a chimeric medial thigh flap consisting of both gracilis and PAP flap tissues is feasible in a cadaveric model. The vascular anatomy of this potential flap appears suitable for future utilization in a clinical setting.

Alternative flaps in autologous breast reconstruction.

The gold standard for autologous reconstruction in the post-mastectomy patient remains the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap, although many women may not be candidates for abdominally based free tissue transfer. In this scenario, there are several other donor site options based from the thigh (transverse and diagonal upper gracilis flaps, profunda artery perforator flap, lateral thigh flap) and trunk (lumbar artery perforator flap, superior and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps). This study will review the history, relevant anatomy, surgical technique and outcomes for alternative flaps in autologous reconstruction. Additionally, preoperative imaging (CTA, MRA) and novel applications (stacking flaps, neurotization) in breast reconstructive microsurgery will be discussed.

The Thin Profunda Artery Perforator Flap: Customized Design and Harvest

A thin profunda artery perforator flap harvested from the left thigh is shown in this video. Preoperative computed tomographic angiography is used to assess morphology of the perforators and its branches, pedicle length and vertical location of the two branches from the ischial tuberosity. These measurements are translated on to the patient. Locations of both branches are confirmed with a handheld doppler. The authors concluded that preoperative computed tomographic angiography is a useful technique to provide detailed anatomic information on morphology of perforators, course through the septum or muscle above the deep fascia and skin thickness. Computed tomographic angiography allows quick and easy assessment of the whole vascular anatomy of the leg and helps to arrive at the decision about selection of the best flaps based on the characteristics of the defect and on the individual anatomy of the patient.

Consecutive Bilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Stacked Abdominally Based and Posterior Thigh Free Flaps.

Multiple perforator flap breast reconstruction is an option that avoids implants in selected patients with minimal donor tissue. The technique addresses the need for additional skin to help create a breast envelope with more natural ptosis and additional volume to help create a body-appropriate breast mound while avoiding serial fat grafting. Using four flaps for the reconstruction of two breasts (bilateral stacked flap reconstruction) has recently become feasible with the advancement of microsurgical techniques, increased experience with alternative perforator flaps, and use of co-surgery. In this article, we describe our early experience with bilateral stacked flap breast reconstruction. From January of 2014 to October of 2018, the senior co-surgeons performed 50 consecutive bilateral stacked flap operations at a single institution. All reconstructions were performed in delayed fashion with a mean operative time of 10 hours. Most breasts (94 percent) were reconstructed with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap combined with a profunda artery perforator flap. Most flap microanastomoses (91.5 percent) were performed directly with internal mammary vessels. The larger of the two flaps was typically placed inferiorly (66 percent), but there was significant inset variability. Of 200 flaps, five were lost (2.5 percent). Seven take-backs were needed for a flap-related concern, which included two negative explorations and a flap salvage. The most common non-flap-related complication was a thigh wound (17 total, eight requiring a procedure). The authors' early experience suggests that bilateral stacked flap breast reconstruction is a powerful tool that can be performed with an acceptable microsurgical risk and an acceptable complication profile in highly selected patients. Therapeutic, IV.

Perforator Mapping of the Profunda Artery Perforator Flap: Anatomy and Clinical Experience.

Discovering alternatives to workhorse flaps that have more consistent anatomy and lower donor-site morbidity has become a focus of reconstructive surgery research. This study provides a simplified approach to profunda artery perforator flap design and harvest based on reliable anatomical landmarks. A retrospective review was conducted of 70 patients who underwent 83 profunda artery perforator flap reconstructions for postoncologic defects from 2016 to 2018. The authors recorded and analyzed the profunda artery perforator flap sizes and clinical applications, the numbers and locations of the perforators, and the patient outcomes. Most of the profunda artery perforator flaps were for head and neck [46 patients (65.7 percent)] and breast [21 patients (30 percent)] reconstructions. Flaps were most commonly based on perforator A (33.7 percent) and perforator B (33.7 percent), followed by perforators B and C combined (18.1 percent). Perforators were located a mean of 7.5 cm (perforator A), 12.7 cm (B), and 17.6 cm (C) distal to the pubic tubercle parallel to the axis between the pubic tubercle and the medial femoral condyle and 7.9 cm (A), 7.3 cm (B), and 6.1 cm (C) posterior from the axis. There was no flap loss. One patient underwent successful salvage surgery after arterial flap thrombosis. Eight patients (9.6 percent) developed superficial wound dehiscence that was managed conservatively. Perforator mapping demonstrated consistent anatomical locations of sizeable profunda artery perforators in the inner thigh. Along with its consistent and robust vascular anatomy and minimal donor-site morbidity, the profunda artery perforator flap's volume and pliability make it a reliable option for soft-tissue reconstruction. Therapeutic, IV.

The Feasibility of Harvesting an Innervated Profunda Artery Perforator Flap for Breast Reconstruction

Summary:The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has become an alternative option for breast reconstruction. Reliable perforators arise through the adductor magnus muscle, and dissection of the perforator is straightforward. Recently, we have found that the PAP flap with the sensory nerves can be harvested as an innervated flap. We discuss the feasibility of PAP flap neurotization. We reviewed 13 patients for whom innervated PAP flap harvesting was considered. The average age was 50.7 years. There are 3 different patterns of innervated PAP flap harvesting, Type 1: including a sensory nerve that can be found in the adipose tissue around the PAP flap, Type 2: including a sensory nerve that runs along the medial femoral circumflex system, and Type 3: including a sensory nerve that runs along the profunda artery perforators. The average flap harvest time was 2:11 ± 0:31, and a sensory nerve was identified in 10 of 13 cases (77%). No sensory nerves were found in the other 3 cases. The length of the included sensory nerve was 5.5 ± 1.6 mm on average. Types 1 and 2 were found in 3 patients (30%), Type 3 was found in 2 patients (20%), and combined Types 1 and 3, 2 and 3 were found in one patient each (10%). As sensory nerves run around the PAP flap or close to the perforators, it is easy to perform flap neurotization with the PAP flap. We believe that the PAP flap could be an alternative option to achieve sensate breast reconstruction.

Breast reconstruction with the extended profunda artery perforator flap

The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap is a reliable flap for breast reconstruction. By extending the traditional flap, it is possible to include more tissue and thereby enhance flap volume. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the technique for extended profundal artery perforator flap harvest and to demonstrate results in a population otherwise not suited for autologous breast reconstruction. Retrospective chart review of all patients who received extended PAP flap breast reconstruction between 2016 and 2018 was performed. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative complications were recorded in a pre-defined form and analyzed. A fully illustrated and step-by-step description of the procedure was created and included. A total of 46 extended PAP flaps for breast reconstruction were performed on 28 patients. Forty-three were 'regular' extended PAP flaps, one was a stacked flap, and two were transverse myocutaneous gracilis flaps with extended PAP flap skin design. Mean pre-operative breast volume was 330 cc, and mean flap weight was 400 g. The success rate was high (97.8%), and complications included one partial flap loss (2.2%), one wound dehiscence of the breast (2.2%), and wound dehiscence of the donor site (11 patients, 23.9%). The modified and extended profunda artery perforator flap is an excellent autologous tissue option for breast reconstruction even in large-breasted patients or patients with a relatively low body mass index. Advantages include higher flap volume, reliable blood supply, higher skin volume, and the possibility of choosing from several perforators, making dissection more convenient.