Profunda Artery Perforator Flap Research Articles

Alternatives to the Gold Standard: A Systematic Review of Profunda Artery Perforator and Lumbar Artery Perforator Flaps for Breast Reconstruction.

Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the current gold-standard autologous option. The profunda artery perforator (PAP) and lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flaps have more recently been described as alternatives for patients who are not candidates for a DIEP flap. The aim of this study was to review the survival and complication rates of PAP and LAP flaps, using the DIEP flap as a benchmark. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Papers were screened by title and abstract, and full texts reviewed by three independent blinded reviewers. Quality was assessed using MINORS criteria. Sixty-three studies were included, for a total of 745 PAP, 62 stacked PAP, 187 LAP, and 23,748 DIEP flap breast reconstructions. The PAP (98.3%) had comparable success rate to DIEP (98.4%), and the stacked PAP (88.7%) and LAP (92.5%) success rate was significantly lower (P < 0.0001). The PAP and LAP groups both had a low incidence of fat necrosis. However, the revision rate for the LAP group was 16.1% whereas the PAP group was 3.3%. Donor site wound dehiscence rate was 2.9 in the LAP group and 9.1% in the PAP group. Profunda artery perforator and DIEP flaps demonstrate very high rates of overall survival. The LAP flap has a lower survival rate. This review highlights the survival and complication rates of these alternative flaps, which may help clinicians in guiding autologous reconstruction technique when a DIEP flap is unavailable.

Sizing-Up a Novel Medial Thigh Flap: A Comprehensive Volumetric Analysis of the Chimeric Gracilis and Profunda Artery Perforator Flap.

The presence of a chimeric gracilis and profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap with a common arterial pedicle has been demonstrated on computed tomography angiography (CTA) in up to 59% of patients and confirmed in a cadaveric model1,2. Already utilized for head & neck reconstruction by Heredero et al., this novel flap could provide more volume than either flap alone which is advantageous, particularly in patients with sizable defects.3 The purpose of this study was to determine the average tissue volume that can be utilized from this chimeric flap. CT Angiogram imaging studies exhibiting chimeric flap anatomy were reviewed over a 7 year period at a single institution utilizing Visage Version 7.1, a radiology picture archiving and communication system (PACS). This software was used to trace the flap pedicles and to capture estimated soft tissue volumes of each respective flap. A total of 31 patients, consisting of 52 lower extremity gracilis and PAP chimeric flaps, underwent tissue volume analysis. The average total volume of soft tissue supplied by the gracilis flap was found to be 70.21 cm3 (SD=26.99). The average volume of the PAP flap was 31.73 cm3 (SD=26.12). The average total volume captured by the chimeric gracilis and PAP flap was 101.94 cm3 (SD=62.40). The potential soft tissue volume that can be harvested from a chimeric gracilis and PAP flap is significantly greater than solitary gracilis or PAP flaps. This chimeric flap may serve as a viable and advantageous reconstructive option for patients requiring large volume soft tissue coverage, particularly if other sizable options are not available.

Donor site scar preference in head and neck free flap reconstruction: The patient point of view

BackgroundSeveral free flaps are nowadays available for functional reconstruction after hemi-glossectomy in head and neck oncologic surgery. Radial forearm free flap (RFFF) and anterolateral thigh (ALT) have been played a workhorse role until recent years, when other valuable options such as Medial Sural Artery Perforator (MSAP) flap and Profunda Artery Perforator (PAP) flap demonstrated to be suitable contenders and are increasingly taken into account. This study aims to investigate the preference of the donor site in the light of esthetical and functional outcomes. MethodsThe participants attended a one-to-one interview with a surgeon explaining a standardized head and neck oncological procedure requiring a soft tissue reconstruction. The donor site preference in terms of esthetical, functional and overall outcomes among these four flap options was investigated. ResultsUnivariable and multivariable analysis were performed comparing the donor site preference between the two most widespread free flap RFFF vs ALT. Subsequently, the analysis was performed comparing RFFF, ALT, MSAP and PAP. ConclusionsThe study illustrated that a diverse group of patients exhibits similarly diverse preferences and expectations. As we observe a shift in the age distribution of patients with OSCC from the fifth-sixth decade towards the two extremes, and an increased incidence in the female population, it becomes essential to enhance reconstructive options provided to patients. This ensures that, while maintaining an equivalent functional outcome, we maximize patient satisfaction to the fullest extent possible.

One versus two vein anastomoses in breast reconstruction with a profunda artery perforator flap-does it make a difference.

The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has gained popularity as a reliable alternative in breast reconstruction. Extensive research has focused on its vascular supply, dissection techniques, and broader applications beyond breast reconstruction. This study aims to investigate the correlation between the number of veins anastomosed for the PAP flap and postoperative complications. A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of breast reconstructions with PAP flaps at our institution between 2018 and 2022. A total of 103 PAP flaps in 88 patients were included. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between flaps with one vein anastomosis and those with two vein anastomoses. Patient characteristics, intra and postoperative parameters were analysed. One vein anastomosis was used in 36 flaps (35.0%), whereas two vein anastomoses were used in 67 flaps (65.0%). No significant differences were found in patient characteristics between the one vein and two vein groups. The comparison of ischemia times between flaps with one versus two veins revealed no statistically significant difference, with mean ischemia times of 56.2 ± 36.8 min and 58.7 ± 33.0 min, respectively. Regarding outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences in secondary lipofilling, revision of vein anastomosis, or total flap loss between the two groups. Fat necrosis was observed in 5 (13.9%) one vein flaps and 5 (7.5%) two vein flaps, indicating no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = .313). In the one vein group, the most frequently employed coupler ring had a diameter of 2.5 mm. In the two vein group, the most prevalent combination consisted of a 2.0 mm diameter with a 2.5 mm diameter. Based on our study results, both one vein anastomosis and two vein anastomoses are viable options for breast reconstruction with PAP flap. The utilization of either one or two veins did not significantly affect ischemia time or flap loss. Fat necrosis exhibited a higher incidence in the single-vein group; however, this difference was also not statistically significant. These findings underscore the effectiveness of both approaches, providing surgeons with flexibility in tailoring their surgical techniques based on patient-specific considerations and anatomical factors.

Profunda artery perforator flap—a novel approach to soft tissue reconstruction post lower limb amputation: a case report

The authors report a case with successful resurfacing of a through- knee amputation stump using two ipsilateral profunda artery perforator flaps from the same vascular tree.

Buried Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Outcomes and Technical Considerations.

The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes in patients undergoing buried and non-buried free flaps for breast reconstruction, in addition to evaluating the safety and reliability of venous flow couplers. A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing free flap breast reconstruction between 2013 and 2023. The primary outcomes were free flap failure, complications and the number of procedures required to complete the reconstructive journey. A total of 322 flaps were performed in 254 consecutive patients, with 47.5% (n = 153) being buried and 52.0% (n = 169) being non-buried reconstructions. The most common flap of choice being deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps (81.9%) followed by profunda artery perforator flaps (14.3%). There was no significant difference between the two groups in complications, including flap failure (buried 2.0% vs. non-buried 1.8% p = 0.902). There was a significant reduction in the number of procedures required to complete the reconstructive journey, with 52.2% (n = 59) of patients undergoing single-stage breast reconstruction in the buried group compared with only 25.5% (n = 36) in the non-buried group (p < 0.001). Two (0.6%) patients experienced a false negative in which the signal of the flow coupler was lost but the flap was perfused during re-exploration. No flap losses occurred without being identified in advance by a loss of audible venous flow signal. Buried free flap breast reconstruction is safe and requires fewer operations to complete patients' reconstructive journey. Flow couplers are a safe and effective method of monitoring buried free flaps in breast reconstruction.

Patient-reported and surgical outcomes of profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap breast reconstructions compared to deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) using BREAST-Q

BackgroundAutologous breast reconstruction patients require thorough assessment, with the profunda femoris artery perforator flap (PAP) having become an important autologous reconstruction option alongside the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP). Breast reconstruction impacts patients psychologically, physically and mentally. The BREAST-Q aids to assess patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs). We aim to critically compare post-operative clinical outcomes, aesthetic results, morbidity and patient satisfaction between DIEP and PAP patients, using clinical follow-up and PROMs. MethodsA non-blinded two-armed prospective cohort study was performed. Patients undergoing PAP or DIEP reconstructions between January 2021 and February 2022 were included and followed up for at least one year post-operatively. Demographic and per-operative data was acquired. Breast-Q data was collected pre-operatively, and at 2-week, 3-month and 1-year intervals post-operatively. Results157 patients had autologous breast reconstruction (207 flaps), with 129 (82.1%) DIEP patients and 21 (13.3%) PAP patients. 37 (28.6%) patients underwent bilateral DIEP reconstructions and 1 (5%) PAP case was bilateral. Remaining PAP cases were stacked flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction. Mean ischaemia time for PAP was 55.29 (+/- 15.59minutes) compared to 69.52 (+/- 21.74minutes) for DIEP (p=0.014). Donor site wound dehiscence was significantly higher with PAP reconstructions (p=0.014). ConclusionsAt one year follow-up, no significant differences in PROMs across all domains between DIEP and PAP flap reconstructions were noted. This reflects that PAP flaps, despite having a more challenging donor site and higher donor site complications, provide an excellent reconstructive option with similar patient-reported outcomes when compared to the gold-standard DIEP flap reconstruction.

Complex breast reconstruction using bilateral profunda artery perforator-free-flaps in a resource-limited setting: a case report

Interestingly, the current shift in mastectomy patterns and advances in reconstruction techniques have contributed to an increasing number of patients requesting breast reconstruction postmastectomy every year. Depending on available expertise, patients can access breast reconstruction options (immediate or delayed), autologous, or implant-based. We present a case of a 36-year-old female patient 5 years into remission, having undergone mastectomy for invasive ductal carcinoma of the right breast and now preferred risk reduction surgery (prophylactic mastectomy) of her left unaffected breast with immediate reconstruction. The microsurgical technique utilized bilateral profunda artery perforator flaps from both thighs for (immediate and delayed) breast reconstruction. In our scenario, the authors had an unfavorable outcome on the side of delayed breast reconstruction (right) with a venous insufficiency diagnosis leading to unilateral complete flap loss, which was subsequently debrided and reconstructed with an obliquely-oriented pedicled Latissimus dorsi flap. In contrast, following risk reduction surgery and immediate reconstruction on the left side, the buried flap was a complete success, with the free nipple graft doing well postoperatively.

Microsurgical Reconstruction for Advanced Head and Neck Tumors in Africa-Rescued Patients

Although an early diagnosis and treatment would be ideal for head and neck tumors, sometimes it isn´t possible for patients who live in some regions of Africa. We treated some of these patients with tumors rarely seen today in well-developed countries. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all free flap reconstructions for advanced head and neck tumors in Africa rescued patients between June 2014 and December 2017. Patient age, surgical treatment and reconstruction, complications and outcomes were analyzed. Results: Twelve patients have been treated. There were 5 fibular bone flaps, 2 anterolateral thigh flaps, 2 profunda artery perforator flaps, 2 vertical rectus abdominal myocutaneous flaps and 1 latissimus dorsi muscle flap. No flap failures have been recorded. Two serious postoperative complications have been detected (one cerebrovascular event and one nosocomial infection) and one patient was diagnosed with distant disease in the follow-up. No locoregional relapse has been detected. Conclusion: Surgical resection and microsurgical reconstruction may be safe and effective in these advanced head and neck tumors, although it isn`t without potential serious complications.

"Categorizing Patient Selection, Outcomes, and Indications in a Decade of 405 PAP Flaps".

Autologous tissue is the only permanent option for breast reconstruction. While abdominal tissue remains popular, considering alternative donor sites ensures comprehensive care tailored to a patient. The thigh has been established as an excellent choice in autologous reconstruction. We present a ten-year experience with 405 profunda artery perforator flaps (PAP flaps). An IRB approved ten-year retrospective review of all patients treated with PAP flaps for breast reconstruction was performed. Procedures were carried out by two surgeons at the same institution. PAP flaps were divided into four consecutive groups with approximately 100 flaps in each group. Demographics, indications, intraoperative data, post-operative complications, revisions, and patient reported outcomes were recorded and analyzed. 207 patients (405 PAP flaps) were included. This accounted for 17.2% of all breast reconstruction flaps. 55% of patients underwent a multi-flap procedure. The average flap weight was 354.3 g (+/- 117.2), which significantly decreased over time (p<0.001). Rates of major complications were 9.6% wounds, 4.4% seromas, 4.7% hematomas, and 3.5% infections. Total flap loss was 2%, 67% of which were in stacked patients. Satisfaction routinely improved from pre-operative to post-operative. As available flap donor sites continue to evolve, tailoring breast reconstruction to the individual patient is standard in centers of excellence. The PAP flap has emerged as an excellent choice for autologous-based breast reconstruction through utilization of proper patient selection and surgical technique.

The Preferred Design of the Profunda Artery Perforator Flap for Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Transverse or Diagonal?

Since its introduction for autologous breast reconstruction in 2010, the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has emerged as a preferred choice when an abdominal flap is suboptimal. The traditional transverse design (tPAP) was popularized, given the inconspicuous donor scar. A diagonal design (dPAP) has since evolved to address some of the shortcomings of the tPAP. The authors aimed to compare outcomes of tPAP/dPAP flaps harvested for breast reconstruction by a single surgeon. A retrospective review was conducted from 2017 to 2022 of patients undergoing tPAP versus dPAP-based breast reconstruction by a single surgeon at a tertiary cancer center. Patient variables and operative variables were assessed. Need for additional symmetrizing breast procedures were compared. Complications and BREAST-Q patient-reported outcome measures were analyzed. Thirty-nine flaps were used to reconstruct 35 breasts in 24 patients. Average follow-up for the group was 1.8 years. The groups were similar with respect to demographics. The majority of dPAP flaps had two perforators, whereas most tPAP flaps had one perforator. The dPAP flaps had greater average weights, width, and overall surface area. There were no cases of partial/total flap loss. Complications and PROM results were similar between the two groups. The dPAP design allows for a larger skin paddle and greater tissue harvest and capture of cutaneous perforators, without increasing the risk of complications or compromising satisfaction. It should be considered as a viable option in patients unable to undergo abdominal-based reconstruction. Additional patients and multi-institutional efforts are necessary to better compare advantages of either design.

Minimal Scar Autologous Breast Reconstruction with Skin-sparing Mastectomy.

We analyzed 20 patients with unilateral breast cancer who underwent skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction using a free flap (deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in 13 patients and profunda artery perforator flap in seven). Approximately 1 year after primary reconstruction, nipple reconstruction using an arrow flap designed on the skin paddle and resection of the residual skin paddle were performed. Several months later, medical areola tattooing was performed. Bilateral breast symmetry scores, obtained from the distances between anatomic landmarks, were compared before and after breast reconstruction. Postoperative complications such as necrosis of the reconstructed nipple were not observed after two-stage reconstruction, and all procedures including total resection of the skin paddle, nipple reconstruction, and medical tattooing were performed successfully in all cases. Aesthetic outcomes were excellent: comparison of symmetry scores showed no significant differences in any parameters between before surgery and after reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex. We have established step-by-step strategies for mastectomy, autologous breast reconstruction, and then nipple reconstruction, keeping in mind that the skin paddle would later be totally resected in nipple reconstruction, and thereby achieved breast reconstruction with markedly reduced postoperative scarring compared with conventional autologous breast reconstruction.

A Simplified Algorithmic Approach to Vulvar Reconstruction According to Various Types of Vulvar Defects.

Various surgeons adopt various vulvar reconstruction methods for different types of vulvar defects to restore anatomical structures. Vulvar reconstruction has relatively few references as it is performed in many different ways. Our report aimed to create a simplified reconstruction algorithm that can be used to select the reconstruction flap and to compare clinical outcomes. The patients who underwent vulvar reconstruction between April 2017 and May 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The reconstruction flap was selected according to a suggested algorithm, which accounted for the defect location depending on the vulvo-thigh junctional crease-the visual landmark of the inferior pubic ramus-and proper perforator location. Postoperative surgical complications, functional outcomes, and oncologic outcomes were analyzed according to the histologic and flap types. Forty-seven patients underwent reconstruction with 31 internal pudendal artery perforator flaps (66%) and 16 profunda artery perforator flaps or transverse upper gracilis flaps (34%). The histologic type included 21 extramammary Paget disease (44.7%), 20 squamous cell carcinoma (42.6%), and 6 other types (12.8%). Postoperative complications, including wound and functional complications, occurred in 10 patients (21.3%). There were more cases of wound complications with profunda artery perforator flaps and transverse upper gracilis flaps (37.5%) than those with internal pudendal artery perforator flaps (12.9%) (P = 0.04). There were 7 cases (14.9%) of 2-year oncologic recurrence with no significant differences in terms of histologic or flap types. According to our suggested simplified algorithm, various types of flaps resulted in reliable surgical outcomes with minimal complication rates and acceptable functional and oncologic outcomes, and the primary goals of vulvar reconstruction were achieved effectively. Using our algorithm, selection of the reconstruction method could be simplified and specified despite the complexity of vulvar defects.

A novel flap design technique for subtotal tongue reconstruction with an “Individualized and Convenient Tongue Model”

BackgroundTo achieve improved functional outcomes in subtotal tongue reconstruction, a flap design with sufficient volume and appropriate shape is necessary. In this study, we introduce an “Individualized and Convenient Tongue Model” (ICTM) for flap design in subtotal tongue reconstruction. MethodsBy studying the anatomical morphology of the tongue, we found a similar geometry within the dorsum and body of the tongue as well as the mouth floor. This can be used to create an ICTM through folding and splicing. We can simulate tongue defects in the ICTM and transform defect shapes into guide plates for flap design. In this study, fifty-eight patients requiring subtotal tongue reconstruction were randomly divided into two groups: an ICTM group (35 patients) and a conventional group (31 patients). In the ICTM group, we individually designed profunda artery perforator flaps (PAPFs) or anterolateral thigh flaps (ALTFs) using the ICTM method. In the conventional group, the flap was designed according to the surgeon’s clinical experience. Patient demographics, operative and follow-up data were recorded. Swallowing, speech intelligibility, and cosmetic results were assessed using appropriate scales. ResultsAll flaps survived, although there were no significant differences in tumor size, operation time, flap size, and complication rate compared to the conventional group. Patients in the ICTM group had significantly improved speech intelligibility (p = 0.019), cosmetic appearance (p = 0.009), and swallowing ability (p = 0.003). ConclusionsThe ICTM technique is an effective and convenient solution for subtotal tongue reconstruction that provides an individualized flap design and improves functional outcomes compared to the conventional design.

Aesthetic Implications of Bilateral Profunda Artery Perforator Flaps on Thigh and Buttock Proportions.

The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has emerged as an excellent secondary option for autologous breast reconstruction. Despite the increased acceptance, potential secondary benefits concerning aesthetic proportions of proximal thigh and buttock at the donor site have never been systematically investigated. A retrospective review of 151 patients who underwent breast reconstruction with horizontally designed PAP flaps (292 flaps) from 2012 to 2020 was performed. Patient characteristics, complications, and numbers of revision surgeries were collected. In bilateral reconstructions, pre- and postoperative standardized patient photographs were analyzed to identify postoperative changes in proximal thigh and buttock contour. The patients' own perception of postoperative aesthetic changes was determined by an electronic survey. The patients had a mean age of 51 and a mean body mass index of 26.3 kg/m2. The most common complications were minor and major wound complications affecting 35.1% of patients, followed by cellulitis (12.6%), seroma (7.9%), and hematoma (4.0%). A total of 38 patients (25.2%) underwent revision of the donor site. After reconstruction, patients were found to have aesthetically improved proximal thigh and buttock proportions, indicated by a wider thigh gap (thigh gap-hip ratio: 0.05 ± 0.04 vs. 0.13 ± 0.05, p < 0.0001) and reduction in lateral thigh-to-buttock ratio (0.85 ± 0.05 vs. 0.76 ± 0.05, p < 0.0001). Among the 85 patients who responded to the survey (56.3% response rate), 70.6% felt that PAP surgery had aesthetically either improved their thigh contour (54.12%) or not changed it (16.47%), whereas only 29.4% reported that the surgery negatively impacted their thigh contour. PAP flap breast reconstruction leads to improved aesthetic proportions of the proximal thigh and buttock. This approach is ideal for patients with ptotic tissue of the inferior buttocks and medial thigh, a poorly defined infragluteal fold, and inadequate anterior-posterior buttock projection.

Profunda Artery Perforator Flap Tongue Reconstruction: An Effective and Safe Alternative to the Anterolateral Thigh Flap.

The anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap is a workhorse flap for tongue reconstruction. The authors present an alternative option using the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap for glossectomy reconstruction compared to the ALT flap. A retrospective review was conducted of 65 patients who underwent subtotal or total glossectomy reconstruction between 2016 and 2020 (46 ALT vs. 19 PAP flaps). Flap volume was assessed using CT scans at two different time points. Quality of life and functional outcomes were measured using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for head and neck cancer (MDASI-HN). Patients undergoing a PAP flap had significantly lower BMI compared to ALT flaps (22.7±5.0 vs. 25.8±5.1; p=0.014). Donor site and recipient site complications were similar as was the mean flap volume seven months after surgery (30.9% for ALT vs. 28.1% for PAP; p=0.93). Radiation and chemotherapy did not appear to have a significant effect on flap volume change over time. The most frequently reported high-severity items in MDASI-HN were swallowing/chewing and voice/speech for both cohorts. Patients who had reconstruction with a PAP flap had significantly better swallowing function (p=0.034). Both the PAP and ALT flaps appear to be safe and effective choices for subtotal and total tongue reconstruction. The PAP flap can serve as an alternative donor site, especially in the setting of malnourished patients with thin lateral thigh thickness undergoing reconstruction of extensive glossectomy defects.

A 10-year experience in microsurgical reconstruction of the nose with a lower extremity flap

BackgroundTraditionally, radial forearm free flaps are utilized for nasal lining reconstruction when local flaps cannot provide adequate coverage. However, according to our clinical observation, the skin of the forearm flap is relatively thin and prone to collapse. We present a series of nasal reconstructions using free flaps harvested from the lower extremities to determine if the thick flap could provide more support and decrease the tendency of airway collapse. MethodsFrom March 2011 to July 2021, we identified 15 patients who underwent total or subtotal nasal reconstruction with free flap from the lower extremities (10 anterolateral thigh flap, 4 medial sural artery perforator flap, and 1 profunda artery perforator flap). We included 15 patients who underwent free forearm flap reconstruction as controls. The Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation (NOSE) score was utilized to subjectively evaluate the degree of nasal obstruction symptoms. ResultsThe lower extremity group had a lower NOSE score than the forearm group (25.4 vs. 40). It took more time (6.5 vs. 4.2 months) and more surgeries (4.6 vs. 2.6) from the first free flap reconstruction till forehead flap reconstruction in the lower extremity group than in the forearm group, although the total number of surgeries was comparable between the 2 groups (7.2 vs. 8.1). ConclusionsUtilizing free flaps from the lower extremities in total or subtotal reconstruction of the nasal lining may decrease the tendency of flap collapse and alleviate airway obstruction symptoms and may also allow reconstruction of surrounding defects simultaneously compared with using forearm flaps.

The Use of Conventional Lower-Frequency Color Doppler Ultrasound for Flap Planning in the Lower Extremity.

Handheld Doppler is often inaccurate in localization of perforators for pedicled and free flaps. Color Doppler ultrasound (CDU), in contrast, allows more accurate mapping and characterization of perforators to facilitate rapid flap harvest. Forty-seven flaps harvested from the lower extremity were evaluated preoperatively with CDU by a single surgeon with a conventional low-frequency ultrasound device (Philips Sparq, Cambridge, Mass). Flaps evaluated included profunda artery perforator flaps (n = 36), anterolateral thigh flaps (n = 2), pedicled propeller perforator flaps (n = 7), and toe transfers (n = 2). In all cases where a free profunda artery perforator or anterolateral thigh flap was used, the location of the dominant perforator visualized preoperatively correlated exactly with intraoperative findings. In cases where CDU was used preoperatively to locate a large perforator close to a lower extremity defect for reconstruction with a propeller perforator flap, all perforators could be used, and all flaps were successful. Preoperative CDU is particularly useful for flap planning where knowledge of the location of the dominant perforator is critical. This includes planning of thin and superthin free flaps, as well as freestyle perforator flaps. Our clinical experience suggests that this technology should be routinely adopted in certain aspects of reconstructive microsurgery.

SP24. The Profunda Artery Perforator Flap in Breast Reconstruction: Long-term Outcomes, Risk Factors and Comparison with Other Flaps

SP24. The Profunda Artery Perforator Flap in Breast Reconstruction: Long-term Outcomes, Risk Factors and Comparison with Other Flaps

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Clinical Outcomes of Profunda Artery Perforator Versus Gracilis Thigh Flap as a Second Choice for Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Autologous breast reconstruction remains a versatile option to produce a natural appearing breast after mastectomy. The deep inferior epigastric perforator remains the most commonly used flap choice, but when this donor site is unsuitable or unavailable, the transverse upper gracilis (TUG) or profunda artery perforator (PAP) flaps are popular secondary alternatives. We conduct a meta-analysis to better understand patient outcomes and adverse events in secondary flap selection in breast reconstruction. A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE and Embase for all articles published on TUG and/or PAP flaps for oncological breast reconstruction in postmastectomy patients. A proportional meta-analysis was conducted to statistically compare outcomes between PAP and TUG flaps. The TUG and PAP flaps were noted to have similar reported rates of success and incidences of hematoma, flap loss, and flap healing (P > 0.05). The TUG flap was noted to have significantly more vascular complications (venous thrombosis, venous congestion, and arterial thrombosis) than the PAP flap (5.0% vs 0.6%, P < 0.01) and significantly greater rates of unplanned reoperations in the acute postoperative period (4.4% vs 1.8%, P = 0.04). Infection, seroma, fat necrosis, donor healing complications, and rates of additional procedures all exhibited high degree of heterogeneity precluding mathematical synthesis of outcomes across studies. Compared with TUG flaps, PAP flaps have fewer vascular complications and fewer unplanned reoperations in the acute postoperative period. There is need for greater homogeneity in reported outcomes between studies to enable for synthesis of other variables important in determining flap success.