Amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is a rare and severe obstetrics emergency, and a significant cause of maternal mortality. Since first described by Meyer in 1926, the underlying pathophysiology of AFE has eluded researchers and clinicians (Hecser et al. J Exper Med Surg Res 2008;15:159–63). A 9-year population-based cohort study of AFE in 120 established cases (Kitzpatrick et al. BJOG 2015; in press) confirmed the rarity of the condition, and that it continues to be a leading cause of maternal death. In 1949, Shotton and Taylor published a case of pulmonary embolism by amniotic fluid with a literature review (Shotton et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1949;56:46–53). They described the then contemporary symptoms of sudden and profound shock, dyspnoea, cyanosis, and pulmonary oedema. Onset was thought to occur in labour, concurrent with contractions, or shortly after delivery, with resultant stillbirth and maternal death within minutes to hours. The paper highlights the necessity of maternal autopsy in reaching a conclusive diagnosis, dependent on demonstrating amniotic fluid, containing fetal particulates, in the pulmonary vasculature (Figure 1), but also within uterine and cerebral vessels. Present-day diagnosis increasingly recognises clinical features, in order to exclude other pregnancy-related complications or medical conditions. Early diagnosis may be the best way to improve outcomes and authors of case reports over the last 70 years have been looking for better clues as to how to facilitate diagnosis and improve outcomes. The signs of AFE have remained essentially unchanged over the years: sudden cardiovascular collapse, respiratory distress with severe maternal hypoxia and coagulopathy, with cardiac arrest found to be the main predictor of death or permanent neurological injury. The early papers suggested increased odds of AFE among multigravidae, fetal macrosomia, post-dates pregnancies, and a strong association with violent uterine contractions. Contemporary studies have found an increased incidence in women aged over 35 years, in those presenting with polyhydramnios, eclampsia, or placenta praevia, and following cervical trauma, induction of labour, instrumental vaginal delivery, and caesarean delivery (Conde-Agudelo et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;201:445.e1–e13), with caesarean section associated with the highest odds ratios for AFE (Kramer et al. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2013;27:436–41). Early and later papers all agree on presentation occurring close to delivery, predominantly after membrane rupture, with contractile pressure gradients accounting for liquor entry into the maternal venous system. The haemodynamic response in true cases of AFE appears to be biphasic, with initial pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure, followed by left ventricular failure (Conde-Aguledo et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;201:445.e1–e13). It remains unclear why only certain women proceed to develop the fatal acute reaction. Suggestions include the volume or type of fluid content exposure, maternal factors, a maternal immune reaction, or a type of anaphylactic reaction. Early responses were limited to the use of morphine, atropine, and oxygen. Although there remains no specific treatment, current management focuses on oxygenation, maintenance of cardiac output, haemorrhage control, and correction of coagulopathy. Promising therapies include selective pulmonary vasodilators and recombinant activated factor VIIa. None declared. Completed disclosure of interests form available to view online as supporting information. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.