Professor Of Criminology Research Articles

Path dependence and criminal justice reform: Introducing the special issue

The Howard Journal of Crime and JusticeVolume 62, Issue 1 p. 3-10 INTRODUCTION Path dependence and criminal justice reform: Introducing the special issue Thomas Guiney, Thomas Guiney Thomas Guiney is Assistant Professor of Criminology, University of NottinghamSearch for more papers by this authorAshley Rubin, Ashley Rubin Ashley Rubin is Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Hawai‘i at MānoaSearch for more papers by this authorHenry Yeomans, Corresponding Author Henry Yeomans H.P.Yeomans@leeds.ac.uk Henry Yeomans is Professor of Criminology, University of Leeds Correspondence Henry Yeomans, Professor of Criminology, University of Leeds. Email: H.P.Yeomans@leeds.ac.ukSearch for more papers by this author Thomas Guiney, Thomas Guiney Thomas Guiney is Assistant Professor of Criminology, University of NottinghamSearch for more papers by this authorAshley Rubin, Ashley Rubin Ashley Rubin is Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Hawai‘i at MānoaSearch for more papers by this authorHenry Yeomans, Corresponding Author Henry Yeomans H.P.Yeomans@leeds.ac.uk Henry Yeomans is Professor of Criminology, University of Leeds Correspondence Henry Yeomans, Professor of Criminology, University of Leeds. Email: H.P.Yeomans@leeds.ac.ukSearch for more papers by this author First published: 20 March 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12520Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Volume62, Issue1Special Issue: Path Dependence and Criminal Justice Reform: Investigating Continuity and Change across Historical TimeMarch 2023Pages 3-10 RelatedInformation

15‐minute cities and the denial(s) of auto‐freedom

15‐minute cities and the denial(s) of auto‐freedom

Introduction: Critical Criminology for the 21st Century

Introduction: Critical Criminology for the 21st Century

Green Criminology: Its Foundation in Critical Criminology and the Way Forward

AbstractThis article outlines the field of critical criminology and how its development was essential for the development of green criminology. Through a personal trajectory, I use my experiences first as a student and later as Professor of Criminology at the University of Oslo as an entry point. I draw on my involvement with the European Group for the Study of Deviance and Social Control to explore how critical criminology has influenced green critical criminology. Critical criminology, with its focus on the crimes of the powerful, is concerned with victims of injustice, and a social harm approach was, I argue, a necessary foundation for non‐speciesist, green critical criminology. The article concludes by elucidating the challenges for a green critical non‐speciesist criminology, which includes a presentation of my current research project, ‘Criminal justice, wildlife conservation and animal rights in the Anthropocene – CRIMEANTHROP’.

Disguised Plagiarism

Disguised Plagiarism

Cyrille Fijnaut: a pioneer from the low countries

ABSTRACT Inspired by American pioneers in the field of police research like Jerome Skolnick, Cyrille Fijnaut resigned in 1969 as a police lieutenant from the police force in the city of Tilburg, the Netherlands in order to create the opportunity to study criminology and philosophy at the KU Leuven in Belgium. At the same university, he wrote in the years 1974–1978 his Ph.D. dissertation on the political history of policing in Europe since the Napoleonic Era. This thesis became the starting point of a rich career as a professor of criminology and criminal law at the Erasmus University Rotterdam, the KU Leuven, Tilburg University and NYU Law School (Global Law School Programme). Over the years, he became an internationally renowned expert in the fields of police and judicial cooperation, organized crime and terrorism, and the transatlantic history of criminology and the criminal justice system. In these and other fields he wrote some 50 books and edited some 50 volumes, and published more than 400 articles in academic and professional journals. In addition, he was one of the founding fathers of the Belgian journal of criminology and criminal law Panopticon and the European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice. He also served as an expert in some of Dutch and Belgian committees of inquiry, e.g. the committee that investigated the safety and security problems of Pim Fortuyn, the Dutch politician who was killed in May 2002. The Dutch government rewarded him with a Knighthood in the Order of the Dutch Lion, and the Belgian government appointed him Commandeur in the Crown Order.

The Origins of and Need to Control Supermax Prisons

DOI 10.1515/cjpp-2013-0009 Calif. J. Politics Policy 2013; 5(2): 146–167 Keramet Reiter* The Origins of and Need to Control Supermax Prisons Abstract: Supermaxes are prisons designed to impose long-term solitary con- finement. Supermax prisoners spend 23 h or more per day in windowless cells. Technology, like centrally controlled automated cell doors and fluorescent lights that are never turned off, allows prisoners to be under constant surveillance, while minimizing all human contact. California built two of the first and largest supermaxes in 1988 and 1989. Corcoran State Prison and Pelican Bay State Prison, which together house more than 3000 prisoners in supermax conditions, were two of 23 new prisons built in California during the late twentieth century era of rapidly increasing incarceration rates and prison capacities. This article will address three stages of supermax operation in California: (1) the early, tumul­tuous years of total administrative discretion and egregious abuses; (2) the middle years of controlled expansion and entrenchment of supermax use; and (3) the recent events and reforms initiated following a hunger strike in California’s segregation units in the summer of 2011. The history of California’s use of supermax prisons reveals both the role of administrative discretion in shaping the initial design and day-to-day operation of the institutions, as well as the perverse incentives that made these institutions increasingly invisible and decreasingly governable. Supermaxes, then, serve as an important piece of the story of mass incarcera- tion in California, a microcosm of the larger trends in administration, law, and politics, which have created the social and economic behemoth of a state prison system facing Californians today. Keywords: California prison system; correctional institutions; penology; prisons; solitary confinement; supermax. *Corresponding author: Keramet Reiter, Assistant Professor of Criminology, Law and Society and of Law, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA, e-mail: reiterk@uci.edu They had sent me up there saying that I was a gang member, that I was a shot caller, that I was involved in violence . . . I’ll never forget that day . . . I remember go[ing] up on a bus, and it took forever to get there . . . I’m just looking at trees, birds. And you see it’s a beautiful coast out there . . . the big old pelicans and I’m trying to get every[thing] I can because I know that it’s over . . . There’s rumors, Lord . . . They say that you are 24 hours a day in your cell. That’s what they were bragging about the place – it’s the worst of the worst. It’s the new Alcatraz . . . Then

Tennessee's New Abolitionists: The Fight to End the Death Penalty in the Volunteer State (review)

Reviewed by: Tennessee's New Abolitionists: The Fight to End the Death Penalty in the Volunteer State Patricia Brake Rutenberg (bio) Tennessee's New Abolitionists: The Fight to End the Death Penalty in the Volunteer State. Edited by Amy L. Sayward and Margaret Vandiver. (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 2010. Pp. 300. $24.95 paper) David Garland's important new study, Peculiar Institution: America's Death Penalty in an Age of Abolition (2010), argues that the persistent legacy of slavery, lynching, and racism accounts for America's unique reluctance to fully relinquish the death penalty. Like Garland, Amy L. Sayward and Margaret Vandiver, in their engaging Tennessee's New Abolitionists: The Fight to End the Death Penalty in the Volunteer State, place Tennessee's circuitous effort to abolish the death penalty in the context of the political, economic, and social history of the state, all of which were influenced in varying degrees by racial issues. Sayward states in the introduction that the "history of the abolition movement in Tennessee provides a valuable window on America's history with capital punishment" (p. 13). Tennessee's New Abolitionists, although placed within the context of the modernization [End Page 136] of the New South period and religious movements that support both sides of the issue, falls short in effectively positioning Tennessee in the larger context of the American death-penalty abolition movement. This task would have entailed a detailed examination of the reform and religious movements that led to successful abolition efforts in other parts of the country. Instead, Sayward, a history professor at Middle Tennessee State University, and Vandiver, a professor of criminology at the University of Memphis and author of Lethal Punishment: Lynching and Legal Executions in the South (2005), offer a collection of essays that constitute a highly sympathetic account of death-penalty abolitionist work in the state. The dedication of the book to the memory of death-penalty abolitionist Harmon Wray aptly conveys the tone. The two essays written by the editors remain the most substantive in this collection. The essays trace the "ambivalence" of the abolitionist past of Tennessee, from Governor John Sevier's request of the state legislature to eliminate the death penalty through the short-lived Progressive-era abolition of the death penalty for murder—but not for rape. The essays further note that abolitionist efforts in Tennessee subsided until the 1950s. Citing the influence of the Highlander Folk School and the efforts of Governor Frank Clement to eradicate the death penalty, the essays also trace the impact in Tennessee of U.S. Supreme Court decisions Furman v. Georgia (1972), which ruled that the death penalty in this and two other cases under consideration constituted cruel and unusual punishment and therefore violated the U.S. Constitution, and Gregg v. Georgia (1976), which in effect upheld the death penalty and led to the reinstatement of Tennessee's death penalty in 1977. Although the current death row population of Tennessee is over ninety, it has carried out only six executions since 1976, placing it last in number of executions among the former states of the Confederacy. These chapters, which are a significant portion of Part I: "The History of the Abolition Movement in Tennessee," are clearly the outstanding contributions in the collection of essays; in fact, the book would have been more convincing if the focus had remained historical. [End Page 137] Part II: "Confronting Capital Punishment in the Volunteer State" is instead largely anecdotal, with the exception of Bill Redick's essay, which describes in detail death-penalty defense representation. Part II includes former Tennessee Supreme Court associate justice Penny White's essay on "Judicial Independence and Capital Punishment in Tennessee," which offers a brief overview on judicial selection in Tennessee and the impact of politics on the judiciary, but concludes with an extensive "Case in Point" in which she describes herself as "the target of a successful 'just say no' campaign" (p. 174). Dixie Gamble's painful firsthand experience with the mental illness of her own son clearly influences her essay on mental illness and the American judicial system. Part III concludes the essay collection with contributions from "Rarely Heard Voices," including reflections of death-row...

“Nobody’s Pretending That It’s Ideal”: Conflict, Women, and Imprisonment in Northern Ireland

Based on primary qualitative research with women prisoners in Northern Ireland (conducted for the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission by the author with Professor Phil Scraton 1, Professor of Criminology, School of Law, Queens University Belfast), this article documents the serious and persistent breaches of international rights standards experienced by incarcerated women and the continued impact of the violent political conflict in the North on women’s penal regimes. Feminist authors have commented on the gendered nature of the state’s punishment of politically motivated women in Armagh prison during the years of conflict and have also discussed the ways in which women prisoners used their bodies as weapons of resistance. It is argued here that the failure of the authorities to effectively tackle the historical and current breaches of women prisoners’ rights as part of the process of transition to a more peaceful society has allowed the continuation of control and punishment-oriented regimes for “ordinary” women prisoners. The article explores the state’s failure to reform the women’s prison system in Northern Ireland in the face of successive critical reports from regional, national, and international inspection and “watchdog” bodies that have recommended the establishment of a new “rights-based” women’s prison unit alongside the development of a gender-specific strategy and policies. The article concludes by assessing the current opportunities for change.

Research as reform?

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Additional informationNotes on contributorsAlison LieblingAlison Liebling is Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of Cambridge

From the Guest Editors: Re‐shaping Policing: Ideas in Action

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Additional informationNotes on contributorsClifford ShearingClifford Shearing holds a South African Research Chair in Security and Justice, hosted by the Department of Criminal Justice, Faculty of Law, University of Cape Town, funded by the Department of Science and Technology and administered by the National Research Foundation. He is Professor of Criminology and Director of the Institute of Criminology at the University of Cape Town. He is also a Professor at the Regulatory Institutions Network, Australian National University. His most recent books are Governing security: Explorations in policing and justice (with Les Johnston, 2003, Routledge), Imagining security (with Jennifer Wood, 2007, Willan), and Policing (with Michael Kempa, forthcoming, Routledge).Jennifer WoodJennifer Wood is a Fellow at the Regulatory Institutions Network at the Australian National University. Her recent books include Democracy, society and the governance of security (co‐edited with Benoît Dupont, 2006, Cambridge University Press), Fighting crime together: The challenges of policing and security networks (co‐edited with Jenny Fleming, 2006, University of New South Wales Press), and Imagining security (co‐authored with Clifford Shearing, 2007, Willan).

Law, Citizenship, and the Construction of (Some) Immigrant "Others"

Law & Social InquiryVolume 30, Issue 2 p. 401-420 Law, Citizenship, and the Construction of (Some) Immigrant “Others” Kitty Calavita, Kitty Calavita Kitty Calavita is professor of criminology, law and society at University of California, Irvine. The research she refers to here was funded by a grant from the Law and Social Sciences Program of the National Science Foundation, SES-0004218. She would like to thank Linda Bosniak and Leti Volpp for their helpful comments on earlier drafts.Search for more papers by this author Kitty Calavita, Kitty Calavita Kitty Calavita is professor of criminology, law and society at University of California, Irvine. The research she refers to here was funded by a grant from the Law and Social Sciences Program of the National Science Foundation, SES-0004218. She would like to thank Linda Bosniak and Leti Volpp for their helpful comments on earlier drafts.Search for more papers by this author First published: 28 July 2006 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2005.tb01017.xCitations: 28AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume30, Issue2April 2005Pages 401-420 RelatedInformation

INVOLVING LAY PEOPLE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Criminology & Public PolicyVolume 3, Issue 4 p. 693-702 INVOLVING LAY PEOPLE IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADAM CRAWFORD, ADAM CRAWFORD Adam Crawford is Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the Centre for Criminal Justice Studies, University of Leeds, U.K. His most recent books include The Local Governance of Crime; Crime Prevention and Community Safety; Integrating a Victim Perspective within Criminal Justice; Crime and Insecurity: The Governance of Safety in Europe; and Youth Offending and Restorative Justice (with Tim Newburn). He has published extensively in a variety of peer-reviewed journals on matters of youth justice, criminal justice policy, policing, community safety, and restorative justice. He has worked for the New Zealand Ministry of Justice, the French Ministry of the Interior, the Northern Ireland Office, and the Home Office on matters of community safety and restorative justice. He is currently writing a book on shifting relations between public and private policing for Oxford University Press with his colleague Stuart Lister. He has recently been awarded a Leverhulme Trust Major Research Fellowship to conduct research into the contractual governance of deviant behavior which will be published as a book by Cambridge University Press.Search for more papers by this author ADAM CRAWFORD, ADAM CRAWFORD Adam Crawford is Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the Centre for Criminal Justice Studies, University of Leeds, U.K. His most recent books include The Local Governance of Crime; Crime Prevention and Community Safety; Integrating a Victim Perspective within Criminal Justice; Crime and Insecurity: The Governance of Safety in Europe; and Youth Offending and Restorative Justice (with Tim Newburn). He has published extensively in a variety of peer-reviewed journals on matters of youth justice, criminal justice policy, policing, community safety, and restorative justice. He has worked for the New Zealand Ministry of Justice, the French Ministry of the Interior, the Northern Ireland Office, and the Home Office on matters of community safety and restorative justice. He is currently writing a book on shifting relations between public and private policing for Oxford University Press with his colleague Stuart Lister. He has recently been awarded a Leverhulme Trust Major Research Fellowship to conduct research into the contractual governance of deviant behavior which will be published as a book by Cambridge University Press.Search for more papers by this author First published: 07 March 2006 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2004.tb00073.xCitations: 12AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume3, Issue4November 2004Pages 693-702 RelatedInformation

Smuggled Chinese: Clandestine Immigration to the United States (review)

Reviewed by: Smuggled Chinese: Clandestine Immigration to the United States Franklin Ng (bio) Ko-lin Chin . Smuggled Chinese: Clandestine Immigration to the United States. Foreword by Douglas S. Massey. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1999. xxiv, 226 pp. Hardcover $64.50, ISBN 1-56639-732-4. Paperback $22.95, ISBN 1-56639-733-2. Why, and by what means, do Chinese illegal immigrants try to enter the United States? Ko-lin Chin, a professor of criminology at Rutgers University, has attempted to provide answers to these and other questions in his new book, Smuggled Chinese: Clandestine Immigration to the United States. In June 1993 , when the Golden Venture ran aground near New York City, the event received widespread coverage in the American media. Several hundred Chinese illegal immigrants braved the cold waters of the Atlantic to escape from their ship. Ten passengers died, and others were injured. This was by no means the only instance of clandestine Chinese immigration to the United States: between 1992 and 1995 at least thirty-six ships bearing Chinese passengers were detected near American waters. That so many attempts were being made to ship Chinese to the United [End Page 72] States led one immigration official to declare: "The way these boats have been coming in, I wouldn't be surprised if I saw one land in Topeka, Kansas. They seem to have the ability to show up anywhere" (p. 64 ). An authority on Chinese gangs in America, Chin decided to investigate the international traffic in Chinese illegal immigrants by conducting research in both the United States and China. In an office on the Lower East Side of Manhattan, near New York City's Chinatown, his associates interviewed three hundred Chinese illegal immigrants. He found many of his informants by using the snowball technique of asking his friends, his interviewers, and the interviewees to supply the names of other informants. All his subjects were paid forty dollars in cash after they completed their interviews. Since the illegal immigrants were Fujianese, he also made two research trips to Fujian Province in China to learn more about their places of origin. He made one trip to Fuzhou City in 1993 and another to Pingtan County in 1995. On both occasions, he was accompanied by his father-in-law, who had been born and raised in Fujian, and who helped with the research and interviews. The Fujianese who immigrate to the United States come from a region of China with a population higher than the national average: 248 persons per square mile as compared to the national figure of 118. Fujian has two seaports, at Xiamen and Fuzhou, which have historically been centers of commerce and smuggling. Like Guangdong, Fujian is an active participant in the increasing liberalization and market-oriented economic change that is sweeping China. Its residents are all too aware of the ubiquitous foreign businessmen and overseas Chinese in their midst. The Fujianese especially envy the prominent status of the meiguoke, the Chinese from the United States. They covet that prestige and desire it for themselves, not aware that in America the meiguoke may have only a marginalized status and low income. And so they migrate, from places in Fujian such as Changle City, Fuzhou City, Tingjiang Township, Mawei District, and Lianjiang County. With contact and informal trade between Taiwan and China on the increase since 1987, Taiwanese and Taiwanese ships have been heavily involved in the clandestine trafficking in Chinese illegal immigrants. Chin illuminates many fascinating aspects of this illegal traffic from Fujian. There are a variety of push and pull factors, including economic conditions, the desire to maximize household income, the quest for better job opportunities and higher wages, and the hope for political asylum. But once a steady flow of illegal immigrants is initiated, then migrant networks and supportive frameworks exist to help perpetuate the clandestine migration. The actors involved in this human smuggling include "big snakeheads" (arrangers and investors), "small snakeheads" (recruiters), transporters, corrupt officials, guides and crew members, enforcers, support personnel, and debt collectors. Chinese illegal immigrants may arrive by air, sea, overland travel, or a combination of these methods. Each has its [End Page 73] own advantages and disadvantages, which...

PROFESSOR SIR LEON RADZINOWICZ, LL.D, FBA: A Tribute to Mark His 90th Birthday

Journal Article PROFESSOR SIR LEON RADZINOWICZ, LL.D, FBA: A Tribute to Mark His 90th Birthday Get access ROGER HOOD ROGER HOOD CBE, FBA, Professor of Criminology, Univenity of Oxford, Director of the Centre for Criminological Research, and Fellow of All Souls College Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The British Journal of Criminology, Volume 37, Issue 1, Winter 1997, Page 1, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014127 Published: 01 January 1997

The Variable Effects of Arrest on Criminal Careers: The Milwaukee Domestic Violence Experiment

This research was supported by grant 86IJCXKO43 to the Crime Control Institute from the National Institute ofJustice. The points of view or opinions stated herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the U.S. Department of Justice or the Milwaukee Police Department. We are deeply indebted to former Milwaukee Police Chief Robert J. Ziarnik for his support of this research and to Chief Philip Arreola for continuing that support. We also thank Kathleen Stolpman and the staff of the Sojourner Truth House for their maintenance of hotline records of repeat violence. This article also reflects the work of many Crime Control Institute staff members and interviewers and the advice of Drs. Joel Garner, Albert J. Reiss, Jr., Robert Boruch, and Kinley Larntz, as well as Lucy Friedman and Allen Andrews. Most important were the officers who carried out the experiment, all of whom entered eligible cases into it: Joseph Vukovich, Zygmunt Lipski, Kenneth Jones, Michael Dubis, Lawrence Roberts, Thomas Skovera, Alan Singer, Frederick Birts, Thomas Bohl, Daniel Halbur, Peter Panasiuk, Scott Rinderle, Michael Braunreiter, Timothy Koceja, John Bogues, Edgar Bullock, Kim Stack, Mick Heinrich, Jerome Sims, John Wallace, Wayne Armon, Rosalie Gallegos, Edward Prah, Dean Schubert, Richard Thompson, Debra Glass, Cheryl Switzer, Robert Eckert, Daniel Kent, Tracy Becker, Steven Fyfe, Jeffery Watts, Gregory Blumenberg, Mark Hilt, and Kathleen Borkowski. * Lawrence W. Sherman is Professor of Criminology, University of Maryland and President, Crime Control Institute. Ph.D. Yale University, 1976. Janell D. Schmidt is Director, Milwaukee Office, Crime Control Institute. M.S., University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, 1985. Dennis P. Rogan is Vice President, Crime Control Institute. Ph.D., University of Maryland, 1988. Douglas A. Smith is Professor of Criminology, University of Maryland. Ph.D., Indiana University, 1982. Patrick R. Gartin is Associate in Criminology, University of Florida. Ph.D., University of Maryland, 1992. Ellen G. Cohn is Visiting Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice, Indiana University at Indianapolis. Ph.D., Cambridge University, 1991. Dean J. Collins is Deputy Inspector, Milwaukee Police Department. M.S., University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, 1973. Anthony R. Bacich is Captain, Milwaukee Police Department. M.S., University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, 1986.

Feminist Jurisprudence — or Women-Wise Penology?

Pat Carlen, Professor of Criminology at the University of Keele, argues that 'women-wise' penal strategies should be devised to right some of the wrongs presently suffered by women in the criminal justice system.

Communists and Their Criminal Law Revisited

The way any country defines and treats its offenders may well serve as its calling card. Maria toos, professor of criminology at the University of Ottawa, in her recently published book, Communist Ideology, Law and Crime, has much to say about offenders and how they are defined and treated in two major Communist-ruled countries-the USSR and Poland. The book seems to address two kinds of readers: criminologists innocent of any knowledge about Communist countries, and those specializing in Soviet/East European studies who lack expertise in criminal law and criminology (at xiii). The book, in spite of some errors of fact and/or judgment,1 contains much useful information for these two categories of

Reinventing Probable Cause: Target Selection in Proactive Investigations

Journal of Social IssuesVolume 43, Issue 3 p. 87-94 Reinventing Probable Cause: Target Selection in Proactive Investigations Lawrence W. Sherman, Corresponding Author Lawrence W. Sherman University of Maryland and Crime Control Institute, Washington, DC. LAWRENCE W. SHERMAN is Professor of Criminology at the University of Maryland and President of the Crime Control Institute in Washington, D.C. His current research interests include controlled experimentation in the effectiveness of criminal sanctions, the criminology of place and time, and reinventing the police.Crime Control Institute, 2125 Bancroft Place, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20008-4019.Search for more papers by this author Lawrence W. Sherman, Corresponding Author Lawrence W. Sherman University of Maryland and Crime Control Institute, Washington, DC. LAWRENCE W. SHERMAN is Professor of Criminology at the University of Maryland and President of the Crime Control Institute in Washington, D.C. His current research interests include controlled experimentation in the effectiveness of criminal sanctions, the criminology of place and time, and reinventing the police.Crime Control Institute, 2125 Bancroft Place, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20008-4019.Search for more papers by this author First published: Fall 1987 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1987.tb02350.xCitations: 1 AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume43, Issue3Fall 1987Pages 87-94 RelatedInformation

LEARNING THEORY AND MODERN PSYCHOBIOLOGY

CriminologyVolume 18, Issue 1 p. 130-134 LEARNING THEORY AND MODERN PSYCHOBIOLOGY A Response to Halbasch C. RAY JEFFERY, C. RAY JEFFERY Florida State University C. Ray Jeffery received his Ph.D. in sociology from Indiana University where he studied with E. H. Sutherland. He has held postdoctoral fellowshihps at the University of chicago Law School and the University of Wisconsin. Dr. Jeffery has served as editor of Criminology as well as Vice President and President of the American Society of Criminology, and he has received the Bloch Award and the sutherland Award from ASC. Last year he was a Fulbright-Hays research fellow to the Netherlands where he studied the impact of psychobiology on Dutch criminology. He is currently Professor of Criminology at Florida State University.Search for more papers by this author C. RAY JEFFERY, C. RAY JEFFERY Florida State University C. Ray Jeffery received his Ph.D. in sociology from Indiana University where he studied with E. H. Sutherland. He has held postdoctoral fellowshihps at the University of chicago Law School and the University of Wisconsin. Dr. Jeffery has served as editor of Criminology as well as Vice President and President of the American Society of Criminology, and he has received the Bloch Award and the sutherland Award from ASC. Last year he was a Fulbright-Hays research fellow to the Netherlands where he studied the impact of psychobiology on Dutch criminology. He is currently Professor of Criminology at Florida State University.Search for more papers by this author First published: May 1980 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1980.tb01353.xCitations: 2 AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume18, Issue1May 1980Pages 130-134 RelatedInformation