Primary Care Professionals Research Articles

Perspectives of patients, partners, primary and hospital-based health care professionals on living with advanced cancer and systemic treatment

Abstract Purpose An emerging group of patients lives longer with advanced cancer while receiving systemic treatment. This study aimed to investigate psychosocial aspects of living longer with advanced cancer, and experiences with psychosocial care, from the perspectives of patients, partners, and health care professionals (HCPs). Methods From May to December 2020, participants were purposively selected. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted by video or phone call, containing open questions regarding psychosocial aspects and psychosocial care in oncology. The data was analysed following thematic analysis, leading to overarching psychosocial themes and indications for optimal organisation of psycho-oncological care. Results Fifteen patients, seven partners and eleven HCPs were interviewed. The main psychosocial aspects were increasing loss in several life domains, complexity of making life choices, ongoing uncertainty, and fluctuating fear and hope. Partners were affected by their loved ones’ condition and reported to put themselves second for longer periods of time, while sometimes missing adequate support. HCPs were challenged by addressing the altering psychosocial needs of patients, and tools to identify those in need for psychosocial support are currently lacking. Conclusions Living longer with advanced cancer presents unique challenges for patients and their partners, as well as for HCPs in delivering optimal psychosocial care. Implications for Cancer Survivors Identifying and addressing patients’ psychosocial needs from an early stage on, appointing a central hospital-based contact person, limiting the waiting time between scans and consultations, and addressing the partners’ wellbeing are suggestions to organise optimal psychosocial support in advanced cancer.

Tobacco use and readiness to treat tobacco users among primary healthcare professionals in Soweto.

Despite its hampering influence on the willingness of healthcare professionals (HCPs) to implement tobacco cessation treatments, the tobacco use status of these professionals remains understudied in South Africa. This cross-sectional study, which sampled 444 HCPs, was conducted in five community health centres in Soweto. A self-administered questionnaire collected information on socio-demography, tobacco use, quit attempts and readiness to implement tobacco cessation treatments for their patients. The mean age was 41 years. Most were female, 80% (n= 355); single, 54.1% (n= 240) and black professionals, 91.6% (n= 405). About 22% (n= 96) were ever-users of tobacco, 12.6% (n= 56) current users and 9% (n= 40) ex-users. About 56.6% (n= 30) of current users had contemplated quitting in the past year. Approximately 68% (n= 300) and 82.2% (n= 365) of respondents were ready and willing to implement tobacco cessation treatments, respectively. Only 32% (n= 143) of respondents had received any training on tobacco use and cessation treatments. There was no significant association between tobacco use and readiness to implement cessation treatments (p= 0.50). Tobacco use is prevalent among HCPs and does not influence the implementation of cessation treatments in South African primary health care. Although most reported readiness and willingness to quit tobacco use, more training is required in both formal education and continued professional development.Contribution:This study demonstrates the alarming rate of tobacco product use among primary health care professionals in South Africa. While there is a strong willingness to implement tobacco cessation treatments for their patients, most healthcare professionals still require training to enhance their self-efficacy.

Health Catch-UP!: a realist evaluation of an innovative multi-disease screening and vaccination tool in UK primary care for at-risk migrant patients

BackgroundMigrants to the UK face disproportionate risk of infections, non-communicable diseases, and under-immunisation compounded by healthcare access barriers. Current UK migrant screening strategies are unstandardised with poor implementation and low uptake. Health Catch-UP! is a collaboratively produced digital clinical decision support system that applies current guidelines (UKHSA and NICE) to provide primary care professionals with individualised multi-disease screening (7 infectious diseases/blood-borne viruses, 3 chronic parasitic infections, 3 non-communicable disease or risk factors) and catch-up vaccination prompts for migrant patients.MethodsWe carried out a mixed-methods process evaluation of Health Catch-UP! in two urban primary healthcare practices to integrate Health Catch-UP! into the electronic health record system of primary care, using the Medical Research Council framework for complex intervention evaluation. We collected quantitative data (demographics, patients screened, disease detection and catch-up vaccination rates) and qualitative participant interviews to explore acceptability and feasibility.ResultsNinety-nine migrants were assessed by Health Catch-UP! across two sites (S1, S2). 96.0% (n = 97) had complete demographics coding with Asia 31.3% (n = 31) and Africa 25.2% (n = 25), the most common continents of birth (S1 n = 92 [48.9% female (n = 44); mean age 60.6 years (SD 14.26)]; and S2 n = 7 [85.7% male (n = 6); mean age 39.4 years (SD16.97)]. 61.6% (n = 61) of participants were eligible for screening for at least one condition and uptake of screening was high 86.9% (n = 53). Twelve new conditions were identified (12.1% of study population) including hepatitis C (n = 1), hypercholesteraemia (n = 6), pre-diabetes (n = 4), and diabetes (n = 1). Health Catch-UP! identified that 100% (n = 99) of patients had no immunisations recorded; however, subsequent catch-up vaccination uptake was poor (2.0%, n = 1). Qualitative data supported acceptability and feasibility of Health Catch-UP! from staff and patient perspectives, and recommended Health Catch-UP! integration into routine care (e.g. NHS health checks) with an implementation package including staff and patient support materials, standardised care pathways (screening and catch-up vaccination, laboratory, and management), and financial incentivisation.ConclusionsClinical Decision Support Systems like Health Catch-UP! can improve disease detection and implementation of screening guidance for migrant patients but require robust testing, resourcing, and an effective implementation package to support both patients and staff.

Inclusion of Long Covid patients in the care trajectory post-Covid-19: evidence from Belgium

Abstract Background Evidence suggests that 10-30% of COVID-19 infected people develop persistent symptoms that can be diagnosed as Long Covid. Most Long Covid cases are in patients with a mild acute COVID-19 infection and are mainly treated in primary health care. In July 2022, a care trajectory (CT) post-Covid-19 was launched in Belgium, in which Long Covid patients can benefit from reimbursement of treatment costs when consulting health professionals in primary health care for their rehabilitation. Patients are included in this CT mainly through their general practitioner (GP) and depending on patients’ care needs, treatment is organized in a monodisciplinary or multidisciplinary way. Methods A population-based study on data collected by the Belgian network of Sentinel General Practitioners (SGP) on all Long Covid patients consulting their GP during March-December 2023. Information on inclusion in the CT post-Covid-19 was also registered. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results End of 2023 in Belgium, GPs initiated the CT post-Covid-19 for more than 1000 patients, this mainly for monodisciplinary treatment, less than 10% of included patients received multidisciplinary follow-up. By the SGP, among the registered Long Covid sufferers (N = 14), a total of six cases were included in the CT post-Covid-19. Of these cases, the majority were female, of older age, higher educated and had one or two chronic conditions. Most had a mild or moderate prior COVID-19 infection and all were vaccinated multiple times against COVID-19. Symptoms lasted one year or more for 83.3% of included patients. Treatment focused mainly on self-management, energy management and physical exercise programs, mainly in collaboration with physiotherapists. Conclusions This study yields recent data on patients included in the CT post-COVID-19 in primary care in Belgium. It is important to focus on guidance, follow-up and rehabilitation of Long Covid sufferers by healthcare professionals in Belgium. Key messages • Long Covid patients included in the care trajectory post-Covid-19 in Belgium experience years of debilitating symptoms after their prior COVID-19 infection. • The establishment of the care trajectory post-Covid-19 for Long Covid patients in primary care since July 2022 stimulated collaboration between care givers in Belgian primary health care.

Productivity and consultation times in Portuguese primary care: trends and payment model variations

Abstract Background Portugal faces a shortage of primary care workforce resulting in an increase in patients without Family Physician (FP). While expanding the patient list per FP may help, it could also result in excessive workloads, compromising Consultation Times (CT) and quality of care. Furthermore, it is important to study the role of the primary healthcare (PHC) financing model in incentivizing their productivity. This study aims to analyse the productivity and CT in PHC units in Portugal, variation over time, and differences across PHC unit payment models. Methods 6,563 PHC units with different payment models (salary at UCSP, salary and group pay-for-performance at USF-A, and salary, capitation, and individual pay-for-performance at USF-B) from 2015 to 2022 were analysed, including the annual numbers of medical and nursing consultations and full-time equivalents (FTE) of physicians and nurses. Weekly productivity (WP) was calculated using the consultations per FTE physician and nurse. CT were determined by dividing each FTE’s weekly workload by WP. Multivariate analysis explored differences in CT between PHC units, temporal variations, and the influence of the patient population characteristics. Results FTE physicians had a mean WP of 117 consultations (SD 39) lasting 22.4 minutes (SD 7.0). FTE nurses had a mean WP of 56 consultations (SD 18) lasting 41.0 minutes (SD 14.3). Compared to UCSPs, USF-A and USF-B had shorter CT (p < 0.05) by 2.48 to 4.05 minutes for medical consultations and by 5.51 to 8.04 minutes for nursing consultations. CT increased over time, decreased with higher PHC age and favorable socio-demographic context, and increased with higher population density and elderly patients’ proportion (p < 0.05). Conclusions USF-B professionals showed higher productivity and shorter CT, suggesting that financial incentives are effective in enhancing productivity but that gains may be obtained with losses in visit duration. Key messages • Effective workforce management is crucial given the current primary care professionals shortages. • Physicians and nurses in PHC units pay-for-performance exhibit higher productivity and shorter consultation time.

Perceptions of primary health care professionals from Brazil about the food and nutrition monitoring system.

The main factors related to the lack of coverage in Health Information Systems are concentrated in the scarce and incipient training of health professionals regarding the collection and typing of data, as well as the importance of using information. The aim of this study was to analyze the perceptions of primary health care professionals from Brazil about the functioning of the Food and Nutritional Monitoring System (SISVAN). Multicentric qualitative study, carried out with 38 health professionals in Basic Health Units (BHU) in five regions around the country. Data collection took place through interviews, which were submitted to content analysis, using the thematic modality. The treatment of the results and interpretation of the themes were carried out using the theoretical framework of the philosopher Michel Foucault. Four themes emerged: (Lack of) knowledge of SISVAN; SISVAN and the conditional income transfer program; Difficulties in the execution and use of SISVAN information; and Strengths. Some of the interviewees recognized the purpose of SISVAN's functioning. The collection of anthropometric data was related to the conditions of the Bolsa Família Program. Ignorance of the system and/or limited perception emerged as obstacles in the operability, use and quality of the data. The participants recognize that professional training is necessary to optimize the strengths of the system.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practice of primary care professionals regarding community activities: a descriptive study.

Promoting health via a community approach is one of the most effective strategies for reducing the current incidence of chronic diseases. Primary care (PC), through the implementation of community activities (CA), has the potential to achieve this goal. Yet the implementation of CA at health centers is not standardized and is often thanks only to the voluntariness of health professionals. To ascertain the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of PC professionals regarding the implementation of CA. We carried out a cross-sectional study by circulating a self-administered online questionnaire on CA, across the period December 2022 through June 2023 in Galicia (Spain). All health professionals working in the Galician Health Service PC setting were invited to participate. A total of 521 health professionals participated in the study. They included all types of PC health professionals (physicians, general and specialist nurses -midwives, pediatrics, family and community, mental health- and social workers), including residents in training. Only 14.8% and 12.5% of professionals correctly identified CAs and social prescription (SPr) interventions, respectively. Furthermore, 93.9% recognized that the development of CA in health centers was deficient. Despite this, 76.5% showed a good attitude toward participation in CA. PC professionals find it difficult to identify CA and SPr interventions. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the training of these professionals in the implementation of CA with a view to enhancing population health, reducing the incidence of chronic diseases, and helping lessen the healthcare burden of the health system.

Development of an Expert-Based Scoring System for Early Identification of Patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity in Primary Care Settings - the PIDCAP Project.

Early diagnosis of inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) has been shown to reduce mortality, morbidity, and healthcare costs. The need for early diagnosis has led to the development of computational tools that trigger earlier clinical suspicion by physicians. Primary care professionals serve as the first line for improving early diagnosis. To this end, a computer-based tool (based on extended Jeffrey Modell Foundation (JMF) Warning Signs) was developed to assist physicians with diagnosis decisions for IEIs in the primary care setting. Two expert-guided scoring systems (one pediatric, one adult) were developed. IEI warning signs were identified and a panel of 36 experts reached a consensus on which signs to include and how they should be weighted. The resulting scoring system was tested against a retrospective registry of patients with confirmed IEI using primary care EHRs. A pilot study to assess the feasibility of implementation in primary care was conducted. The scoring system includes 27 warning signs for pediatric patients and 24 for adults, adding additional clinically relevant criteria established by expert consensus to the JMF Warning Signs. Cytopenias, ≥ 2 systemic infections, recurrent fever and bronchiectasis were the leading warning signs in children, as bronchiectasis, autoimmune diseases, cytopenias, and > 3 pneumonias were in adults. The PIDCAP (Primary Immune Deficiency "Centre d'Atenció Primària" that stands for Primary Care Center in Catalan) tool was implemented in the primary care workstation in a pilot area. The expert-based approach has the potential to lessen under-reporting and minimize diagnostic delays of IEIs. It can be seamlessly integrated into clinical primary care workstations.

Use of The VES-13 and IVCF-20 Instruments for Risk Stratification of the Older Adults By Primary Care Professionals

Objective: To analyze the use of the Vulnerable Elders Survey 13 (VES-13) and the 20-item Clinical-Functional Vulnerability Index (IVCF-20) instruments in identifying vulnerable elderly individuals or those at risk of vulnerability. Theoretical Framework: The index of vulnerable elderly individuals or those at risk of vulnerability is approximately 30%, justifying the need for research to verify the instruments used by health professionals in their identification. Method: Quantitative approach through a descriptive study. Data collection was carried out through a questionnaire administered to professionals from the Health Strategy teams in a municipality in 2022. Results and Discussion: The VES-13 is the most used instrument by health professionals. However, there were evident difficulties in interpreting the collected data and effectively applying it to improve elderly care. The IVCF-20 was unknown to almost all participants. Research Implications: Based on the results, an extension course was conducted to promote the IVCF-20 to nursing professionals and to recommend training for other professionals. Originality/Value: This study, by analyzing the knowledge and practice of the participants, encouraged the adoption of measures for both the municipality’s adoption of the most updated elderly vulnerability risk stratification index (IVCF-20) and the training of health professionals involved in care.

Barriers and potential solutions for collaboration between primary and secondary care in patients with persistent somatic symptoms and functional disorders: A nominal group technique study

Background Persistent somatic symptoms and functional disorders (PSS/FD) are complex conditions requiring collaboration between healthcare professionals. This is especially true at the interface between primary and secondary care interface. The current fragmentation of care is a major barrier to this, leading to poor experiences and outcomes and high costs for healthcare and society. Objectives The aim is to identify barriers and possible solutions for collaboration between primary and secondary care in patients with PSS/FD. Methods In two sessions, using the nominal group technique, a mix of primary and secondary care professionals identified barriers and possible solutions to collaboration between primary and secondary care in PSS/FD care. Barriers to collaboration were identified during session one, with potential solutions identified during session two in response to the top eight barriers. Each session ended with a voting round ranking the barriers and solutions. Results A total of 102 healthcare professionals participated in two sessions. In the first session, 55 participants provided a list of 22 barriers, while in the second session, 47 participants provided 18 possible solutions. The top barriers related to shared language and protocols, referral quality, expectations and responsibilities between healthcare professionals and patients, and time pressure. The top solutions identified related to general practitioners using electronic consultations with specialists and shared terminology with patients. Conclusion The identified barriers and possible solutions for collaboration between primary and secondary care need attention when considering collaboration in PSS/FD care and related settings, both in new and ongoing collaborations.

Effectiveness of a health literacy intervention targeting both chronic kidney disease patients and health care professionals in primary and secondary care: a quasi-experimental study.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with limited health literacy are at risk for faster disease progression. To counteractthis problem, we developed 'Grip on your Kidneys' (GoYK), an intervention targeting patients and health care professionals. We assessed the effect on self-management, patient activation, clinical parameters, consultation quality, and the professionals' use of health literacy strategies. We further evaluated the process. A quasi-experimental study included 147 patients with CKD and 48 professionals from Dutch general practices and nephrology clinics. Patients and professionals in the intervention group (IG) received GoYK. Control patients received care-as-usual from the participating professionals. Data were collected with questionnaires and from patient records at baseline (T0), 4months (T1) and 9months (T2). No effects on self-management and patient activation were found. Conversely, at T2, the proportion of patients with hypertension decreased in the intervention group (odds ratio = 0.45, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) [0.20, 0.99]). In the intervention group, more lifestyle topics were discussed, at T1 (difference = 0.80, 95%CI [0.28, 1.31]) and T2 (difference = 0.69, 95%CI [0.14, 1.25]). Furthermore, several outcomes related to consultation quality improved. Professionals in the intervention group improved the use of health literacy strategies more, at T1 (difference = 0.64, 95%CI [0.33, 0.95]) and T2 (difference = 0.56, 95%CI [0.19, 0.93]). In general, patients and professionals considered GoYK to be useful. GoYK is promising, and offers a blueprint to optimize care for patients with limited health literacy. Researchers should develop and test interventions like GoYK, focusing on patients at risk for CKD, and with very low health literacy.

The association of social networks with the job performance of primary health care professionals: the mediating effect of knowledge sharing.

Social networks formed through social media platforms have facilitated knowledge sharing among primary health care professionals (PHCPs). However, the impact of these networks on PHCPs' job performance and the mediating role of knowledge sharing remain underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the association between social networks formed via social media and the job performance of PHCPs, and to explore the mediating role of knowledge sharing in this association. A cross-sectional survey was carried out among PHCPs in Henan Province, China, involving 655 valid responses. Validated scales measured the key variables, and structural equation modeling (SEM) tested the proposed hypotheses, including the mediating effect of knowledge sharing through bootstrap method. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 24.0 and AMOS 24.0. The degree centrality (β = 0.225; p = 0.001) and network heterogeneity (β = 0.093; p = 0.043) of the social network had a significant direct association with job performance, whereas the direct associations of betweenness centrality and network tie strength with job performance were not significant. Knowledge sharing mediated the relationship between degree centrality (β = 0.147; p = 0.001), network heterogeneity (β = 0.251; p = 0.043), and job performance. The study revealed the internal mechanisms by which social network characteristics influence PHCPs' job performance, highlighting the mediating role of knowledge sharing. Social networks formed within social media contexts have multifaceted effects on job performance, with knowledge sharing as a critical mediating variable. These findings underscore the importance of leveraging social media for professional networking and knowledge exchange to enhance PHCPs' job performance.

Effectiveness of a Motivational Interviewing-Based Intervention in Decreasing Risky Alcohol Use in Primary Care Patients in Spain: A Controlled Clinical Trial

Objective: Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention based on Motivational Interviewing (MI) performed by healthcare professionals in Primary Care (PC) patients with risky alcohol use through a multicenter, two-arm parallel, cluster-randomized, open-label controlled clinical trial. Methods: PC professionals were randomized into two groups: an Experimental Group (EG) and a Control Group (CG). The study was carried out in PC centers of the Andalusian Health Service, located in Cordoba, Spain. An MI-based approach was implemented with patients recruited in the EG, while health advice was provided to those included in the CG. The follow-up period was 12 months, with five visits scheduled. The consumption of standard drinking units per week was quantified, and risky alcohol use was estimated using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). An intention-to-treat statistical analysis was performed. Relative risk (RR), absolute risk reduction (ARR) and the number of subjects needed to treat (NNT) were used to estimate the intervention effect size. Results: A total of 268 patients were included, 148 in the EG and 120 in the CG. Considering the quantification of risky alcohol use, the ARR at 12 months after baseline visit was 16.46% (95% CI: 5.37–27.99), with an NNT of 6 (95% CI: 4–19). According to the AUDIT, the ARR at 12 months was 13.15% (95% CI: 2.73–24.24%), and the NNT was 8 (95% CI: 4–37). Conclusions: We concluded that MI is more effective than the usual health advice in decreasing risky alcohol use in patients treated in PC.

The hostile environment in primary care: Qualitative analysis of a cross sectional survey of health care professionals in primary care

BackgroundIn 2014 the UK government rolled out the then called hostile environment as a series of punitive policies designed to disenfranchise undocumented migrants from living in Britain. As part of these measures upfront charging was introduced in 2017 which saw patients being denied treatment without prior full payment based on their immigration status. AimAssess the knowledge of the charging regulations in a sample of primary care practitioners. Assess the impact of the regulations on both patients and practitioners in a primary care setting. MethodsBuilding on a previous survey by the RCPCH, a cross sectional survey was circulated through the RCGP faculties and GP training groups within England. Demographic information and likert responses were collected from over 300 responses. Thematic analysis of over 120 white space questions was undertaken to create themes and sub-themes. ResultsResults showed an overall poor knowledge of the regulations. Thematic analysis was split into two main categories, (i) human impact of the policies and (ii) the economic and political impact of the policies. Key points were (i) lack of knowledge and awareness of the regulations, (ii) evidence of patient harm through patients’ being denied care, avoiding care or having care delayed, (iii) evidence of clinician harm through burnout, stress, a loss of faith in practice and concerns over extra work and (iv) concerns over implicit bias and structural racism within primary care and (v) concerns over lack of economic analysis. ConclusionCharging of overseas visitors is poorly understood within primary care despite having an impact on both patients and practitioners within this setting. Recommendations to help tackle this issue and reduce harm include training of staff, systematic reporting of harm, and a system wide economic analysis.

What happens between first symptoms and first acute exacerbation of COPD - observational study of routine data and patient survey.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease affects nearly 400 million worldwide - over a million in the United Kingdom - and is the third leading cause of death. However, there is limited understanding of what prompts a diagnosis, how long this takes from symptom onset and the different approaches to clinical management by primary care professionals. Map out the clinical management and National Health Service contacts from symptom presentation to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis and first acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in three time periods; construct risk prediction for first acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Retrospective cohort study and cross-sectional survey. Primary care. Patients with incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease aged > 35 years in England. None. First acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum; new online survey. Forty thousand five hundred and seventy-seven patients were diagnosed between April 2006 and March 2007 (cohort 1), 48,249 between April 2016 and March 2017 (cohort 2) and 4752 between March and August 2020 (cohort 3). The mean (standard deviation) age was 68.3 years (12.0); 47.3% were female. Around three-quarters were diagnosed in primary care, with a slight fall in cohort 3. Compliance with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence diagnostic guidelines was slightly higher in cohorts 2 and 3 for all patients; 35.8% (10.0% in the year before diagnosis) had all four elements met for all cohorts combined. Multilevel modelling showed considerable between-practice variation in spirometry. The survey on the charity website had 156 responses by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Many respondents had not heard of the condition, hoped the symptoms would go away and identified various healthcare-related barriers to earlier diagnosis. Clinical Practice Research Datalink analysis showed notable changes in post-diagnosis prescribing from cohort 1 to 2, such as increases in long-acting muscarinic antagonist (21.7-46.3%). Triple therapy rose from 2.9% in cohort 2 to 11.1% in cohort 3. Documented pulmonary rehabilitation rose from just 0.8% in cohort 1 to 13.7% in cohort 2 and 20.9% in cohort 3. For all patients combined, the median time to first acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients who had one was 1.4 years in cohorts 1 and 2. Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prediction models identified some consistent predictors, such as age, deprivation, severity, comorbidities, post-diagnosis spirometry and annual review. Models without post-diagnosis general practitioner actions had a c-statistic of around 0.70; the highest c-statistic was 0.81, for cohort 2 with post-diagnosis general practitioner actions and 6-month follow-up. All models had good calibration. The three most important predictors in terms of their population attributable risks were being a current smoker and offered smoking cessation advice (32.8%), disease severity (30.6%) and deprivation (15.4%). The highest population attributable risks for variables with adjusted hazard ratios < 1 were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease review (-27.3%) and flu vaccination (-26.6%). Symptom recording and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis vary between practice; predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second had many missing values. There has been some improvement over time in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis and management, with large changes in prescribing, though patient and system barriers to further improvement exist. Data available to general practitioners cannot generate risk prediction models with sufficient accuracy. It will be important to expand the COVID-era cohort with longer follow-up and augment general practitioner data for better prediction. This study is registered as Researchregistry.com: researchregistry4762. This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/99/72) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 43. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Addressing menopause symptoms in the primary care setting: opportunity to bridge care delivery gaps.

Menopause symptoms affect quality of life and financial well-being but are often unaddressed in primary care clinics. Therefore, we evaluated the extent of menopause symptom documentation in electronic health records (EHRs) by primary health care professionals. We retrospectively reviewed adult women who reported moderate or higher vasomotor symptoms on a Mayo Clinic survey conducted from March 1, 2021, through June 30, 2021. We then assessed adequacy of menopause symptom documentation in the EHRs of these women who had primary care visits during the survey period. We reviewed the percentage of documented vasomotor symptoms from May 1, 2019, through May 1, 2021. In the Mayo Clinic Health System-Northwest Wisconsin Region, 229 women self-reported moderate or higher vasomotor symptoms in the Mayo Clinic survey. Although only 23% of these women had vasomotor symptoms listed in the EHR clinical problem lists, 60% of these women had vasomotor symptoms documented in their clinic notes from the primary care visit. Approximately 6% of women reported hormone therapy use for management of menopause symptoms, and nearly 15% reported use of nonhormone prescription therapies for vasomotor symptoms. A greater proportion of women in our study had EHR documentation of bothersome menopause symptoms than those reported in other studies, but vasomotor symptoms remain generally untreated. We need better methods for identifying midlife women with bothersome menopause symptoms in primary care clinics so that appropriate treatment options, including hormone therapy, can be discussed and offered.

Interprofessional Management of (Risk of) Malnutrition and Sarcopenia: A Grounded Theory Study from the Perspective of Professionals.

As our global population ages, malnutrition and sarcopenia are increasingly prevalent. Given the multifactorial nature of these conditions, effective management of (risk of) malnutrition and sarcopenia necessitates interprofessional collaboration (IPC). This study aimed to understand primary and social care professionals' barriers, facilitators, preferences, and needs regarding interprofessional management of (risk of) malnutrition and sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults. We conducted a qualitative, Straussian, grounded theory study. We collected data using online semi-structured focus group interviews. A grounded theory data analysis was performed using open, axial, and selective coding, followed by developing a conceptual model. We conducted five online focus groups with 28 professionals from the primary and social care setting. We identified five selective codes: 1) Information exchange between professionals must be smooth, 2) Regular consultation on the tasks, responsibilities, and extent of IPC is needed; 3) Thorough involvement of older adults in IPC is preferred; 4) Coordination of interprofessional care around the older adult is needed; and 5) IPC must move beyond healthcare systems. Our conceptual model illustrates three interconnected dimensions in interprofessional collaboration: professionals, infrastructure, and older adults. Based on insights from professionals, interprofessional collaboration requires synergy between professionals, infrastructure, and older adults. Professionals need both infrastructure elements and the engagement of older adults for successful interprofessional collaboration.

Structure Of The Single Health System For Diagnosis Of Htlv-1/2 In The Northern Region Of Tocantins

Background: The Human T-cell Lymphotropic Virus (HTLV), the first human retrovirus discovered, is associated with oncogenesis and is subdivided into several groups, with types 1 and 2 being the most prevalent and clinically relevant. Its main forms of transmission include unprotected sexual intercourse, blood transfusions, tissue and organ transplants, as well as vertical transmission (mother to newborn). In Brazil, mandatory testing for HTLV was implemented in the 1990s for blood donations and transplants, and expanded in 2024 by Ordinance No. 3,148 of the Ministry of Health, which includes testing during prenatal care. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the structure of the Unified Health System (SUS) in the municipalities of the far north of Tocantins for the diagnosis of HTLV-1/2. Methodology: This is a qualitative study, in which semi-structured questionnaires were applied to Primary Care professionals and municipal health managers. Results: The results indicated significant deficiencies in knowledge of national protocols and the absence of a structured municipal flow for testing. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the health structure of the municipalities evaluated is insufficient for the effective diagnosis of HTLV-1/2

National stakeholder consultation on how to measure care home residents' quality of life.

The Developing research resources And minimum data set for Care Homes' Adoption and use or DACHA study aims to create a prototype minimum data set combining residents' information recorded by care homes with their data held in health and social care data sets. The DACHA minimum data set will contain information on quality of life. Internationally and in the UK, there is no consensus on collecting information on quality of life in a standardised format equivalent to the consensus for health measures. This paper describes an online consultation with stakeholder representatives about how to measure the quality of life of residents in UK older-adult care homes, for inclusion in the DACHA minimum data set. We drew on principles of the Delphi technique, identifying participants knowledgeable about living, working in and visiting care homes, and preference scoring. We used a bespoke online research engagement platform (Thiscovery, www.thiscovery.org, Cambridge, UK) to engage the participants. Participants included care home staff and managers, old age specialists (clinical/research), commissioners/providers/regulators, primary care professionals, relatives/family carers of care home residents. The consultation is complementary to DACHA's research and patient and public involvement and engagement activities, which have involved people living in care homes; thus, care home residents were not included in this consultation. The first round asked 30 participants to rank the most important principles and domains to consider when measuring quality of life in care homes. Responses to round 1 informed the selection of quality of life measures that round 2 (September 2022) participants were asked to report their familiarity with and confidence in a range of outcome measures all of which met the criteria identified as important in round 1. Recruitment was extended in round 2, and 72 individuals participated. Based on the rankings and the qualitative feedback in round 2, we included four of the shortlisted quality of life outcome measures in DACHA's prototype minimum data set for care homes. The qualitative feedback suggested a shared understanding across the different representative groups about the strengths and limitations of the selected measures. This work makes an important contribution, understanding the opportunities that quality of life measures pose for different stakeholder groups as regular users of care home resident data. In future DACHA work, interviews and focus groups will collect further data about the perceptions of care home staff who completed measures during the pilot study and about the usefulness of the data collected via these measures. The quality-of-life section of the DACHA minimum data set can contribute to informing similar care home data sets internationally. This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number NIHR127234.

The impact of eHealth use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era: a systematic review

BackgroundIn recent years, eHealth has received much attention as an opportunity to increase efficiency within healthcare organizations. Adoption of eHealth might consequently help to solve perceived health workforce challenges, including labor shortages and increasing workloads among primary care professionals, who serve as the first point of contact for healthcare in many countries.The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the impact of general eHealth use and specific eHealth services use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era.MethodsThe databases of CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, IEEE Xplore, Medline ALL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched, using combinations of keywords including ‘eHealth’, ‘workload’, and ‘general practice’. Data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies were independently performed by at least two reviewers. Publications were included for the period 2010 – 2020, before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.ResultsIn total, 208 studies describing the impact of eHealth services use on general practice workload were identified. We found that two eHealth services were mainly investigated within this context, namely electronic health records and digital communication services, and that the largest share of the included studies used a qualitative study design. Overall, a small majority of the studies found that eHealth led to an increase in general practice workload. However, results differed between the various types of eHealth services, as a large share of the studies also reported a reduction or no change in workload.ConclusionsThe impact of eHealth services use on general practice workload is ambiguous. While a small majority of the effects indicated that eHealth increased workload in general practice, a large share of the effects also showed that eHealth use reduced workload or had no impact. These results do not imply a definitive conclusion, which underscores the need for further explanatory research. Various factors, including the study setting, system design, and the phase of implementation, may influence this impact and should be taken into account when general practices adopt new eHealth services.Study registration numberPROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) CRD42020199897; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=199897.