HomeRadiologyVol. 56, No. 3 PreviousNext EditorialInternational Recommendations on Radiological ProtectionRevised by the International Commission on Radiological Protection at the Sixth International Congress of Radiology, London, July 1950Published Online:Mar 1 1951https://doi.org/10.1148/56.3.431MoreSectionsPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In AbstractIntroductionDevelopments in nuclear physics and their practical applications since the last International Congress have greatly increased the number and scope of potential hazards. At the same time biological research has led to an extension of our knowledge of the dangers associated with ionizing radiations. This increase of biological knowledge has not only brought a realization of the importance of certain effects, particularly carcinogenic and genetic effects, but has also provided more information as to the permissible levels of radiation. The International Commission on Radiological Protection has therefore adopted new radiation safety standards with more rigid criteria. Such standards must, in view of the still limited experience of the effects of radiation, be kept continually under review.It appears that the effects to be considered are :1. Superficial injuries.2. General effects on the body, particularly the blood and blood forming organs, e.g., production of anemia and leukemias.3. The induction of malignant tumors.4. Other deleterious effects including cataract, obesity, impaired fertility, and reduction of life span.5. Genetic effects.While it is still fundamental to express whole body exposure in terms of a single number, it is not practicable, in general, in view of the complexity of circumstances now arising, to express the maximum permissible hazards in terms of a single parameter. It is, for example, highly desirable to derive values of maximum permissible concentrations of radioactive materials, in the air or in drinking water, taking into account the metabolism of the materials concerned, and assuming standard anatomical, physiological, and chemical data. Furthermore, the pre-viously accepted value of 1 r per week for maximum permissible exposure to external radiation itself needs revision in the light of the nature of the radiations to which workers are now exposed. There is the added difficulty that the roentgen is not an acceptable unit of dose for all ionizing radiations. Accordingly the following recommendations are based on considerations of the equivalent energy absorbed in tissue coupled with the appropriate relative biological efficiency.While the values proposed for maximum permissible exposures are such as to involve a risk which is small compared to the other hazards of life, nevertheless in view of the unsatisfactory nature of much of the evidence on which our judgments must be based, coupled with the knowledge that certain radiation effects are irreversible and cumulative, it is strongly recommended that every effort be made to reduce exposures to all types of ionizing radiations to the lowest possible level.Exposure to External RadiationArticle HistoryPublished in print: Mar 1951 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByRadiation Protection of a Pregnant Worker, the Embryo and Fetus: Historical Changes in ICRP Recommendations and Current IssuesNobuyukiHAMADA2017 | Japanese Journal of Health Physics, Vol. 52, No. 3Individual response to ionizing radiationNicolasForay, MichelBourguignon, NobuyukiHamada2016 | Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, Vol. 770Interim Report of the JHPS Expert Committee on Radiation Protection of the Lens of the Eye (I)KeiichiAKAHANE, TakeshiIIMOTO, TakeshiICHIJI, SatoshiIWAI, HiroyukiOHGUCHI, KazukoOHNO, ChiyoYAMAUCHI-KAWAURA, HideoTATSUZAKI, NorioTSUJIMURA, NobuyukiHAMADA, YukiFUJIMICHI, YutakaHOTTA, TadashiYAMASAKI, SumiYOKOYAMA2014 | Japanese Journal of Health Physics, Vol. 49, No. 3Why the concept of hormesis has not been incorporated into mainstream radiation health theory: Radiation perspectiveArthur C.Upton2000 | Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2Annex D List of the commission's publications1991 | Annals of the ICRP, Vol. 21, No. 1-3Issues and Reviews in TeratologyWilliam J.Schull, Julia K.Bailey1984Publications of the commission1977 | Annals of the ICRP, Vol. 1, No. 3Radiation protection standards (Part 2)Lauriston S.Taylor, Harold O.Wyckoff1972 | C R C Critical Reviews in Environmental Control, Vol. 2, No. 1-4Radiation DosimetryC.C.Wang, L.L.Robbins1956Konstitution Allergische Krankheiten Krankheiten der Knochen, Gelenke und Muskeln Krankheiten Aus Äusseren Physikalischen Ursachen Ernährungskrankheiten Vitamine und VitaminkrankheitenGerhardSchubert, GünterHöhne1954Künstliche Radioaktive IsotopeGerhardSchubert, GünterHöhne1953Recommended Articles RSNA Education Exhibits RSNA Case Collection Vol. 56, No. 3 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download