The article examines the problem of historical process models, shows the role of values as a stabilizing force of each period of history and scientific and technological discoveries as a dynamic force determining the change of eras. A model is proposed that combines the principles of civilizational and formational approaches to history, in which local civilizations could be considered a way of history until the beginning of the third globalization — the Renaissance, the scientific and technological achievements of which made it possible to unite the world into one economic system. The prehistory of globalization is shown — its early versions: political (the formation of ancient empires, with a single state structure and various cultures in its composition) and religious (the formation of supranational regional world religions, with a single culture in different parts of the corresponding region). The article discusses the role of Russia in this process. The main properties of the four stages of axiogenesis of its culture are shown: the adoption of Christianity, the formation of a single state, European modernization, the creation of a socialist society. The article examines the main problems of constructing a thesaurus of contemporary Russian culture: axiological abstractionism, axiological idolatry, and axiological anti-historicism. The article shows the main forms of interaction between contemporary Russia and the East and the West in the context of Russia's axiogenesis. Three negative aspects of this axiogenesis in relation to the West are highlighted: demonization, which forces one to refuse to understand the degree of inevitability of modernization; isolationism, which forces one to refuse to cooperate with the West; and finally, resentment, which forces one to refuse to understand the nature of one's own problems. Three negative aspects of Russia's axiogenesis in relation to the East are highlighted: angelization of the East, which provokes a refusal to understand the real content of Eastern cultures, and above all, their dependence on the West; underestimation of Eastern threats to Russian security; and finally, a refusal to understand how Eastern cultures are alien to Russian culture. It is argued that in the context of the global problems of our time, generated by the capitalist mode of production, only socialism is capable of stopping the world's continuous movement toward catastrophe. The experience of socialism in the USSR, together with all its negative aspects, must be taken into account and become the basis for the formation of a future thesaurus of Russian culture.
Read full abstract