Processing Of Emotional Content Research Articles

The role of hand gestures in emotion communication: Do type and size of gestures matter?

We communicate emotions in a multimodal way, yet non-verbal emotion communication is a relatively understudied area of research. In three experiments, we investigated the role of gesture characteristics (e.g., type, size in space) on individuals' processing of emotional content. In Experiment 1, participants were asked to rate the emotional intensity of emotional narratives from the videoclips either with iconic or beat gestures. Participants in the iconic gesture condition rated the emotional intensity higher than participants in the beat gesture condition. In Experiment 2, the size of gestures and its interaction with gesture type were investigated in a within-subjects design. Participants again rated the emotional intensity of emotional narratives from the videoclips. Although individuals overall rated narrow gestures more emotionally intense than wider gestures, no effects of gesture type, or gesture size and type interaction were found. Experiment 3 was conducted to check whether findings of Experiment 2 were due to viewing gestures in all videoclips. We compared the gesture and no gesture (i.e., speech only) conditions and showed that there was not a difference between them on emotional ratings. However, we could not replicate the findings related to gesture size of Experiment 2. Overall, these findings indicate the importance of examining gesture's role in emotional contexts and that different gesture characteristics such as size of gestures can be considered in nonverbal communication.

Shared Attention Amplifies the Neural Processing of Emotional Faces.

Sharing an experience, without communicating, affects people's subjective perception of the experience, often by intensifying it. We investigated the neural mechanisms underlying shared attention by implementing an EEG study where participants attended to and rated the intensity of emotional faces, simultaneously or independently. Participants performed the task in three experimental conditions: (a) alone; (b) simultaneously next to each other in pairs, without receiving feedback of the other's responses (shared without feedback); and (c) simultaneously while receiving the feedback (shared with feedback). We focused on two face-sensitive ERP components: The amplitude of the N170 was greater in the "shared with feedback" condition compared to the alone condition, reflecting a top-down effect of shared attention on the structural encoding of faces, whereas the EPN was greater in both shared context conditions compared to the alone condition, reflecting an enhanced attention allocation in the processing of emotional content of faces, modulated by the social context. Taken together, these results suggest that shared attention amplifies the neural processing of faces, regardless of the valence of facial expressions.

Emotional memory for facial expressions in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: The role of encoding method

Memory is better for emotional rather than neutral events or materials (emotional enhancement of memory; EEM). Evidence suggests that this memory benefit remains intact in schizophrenia, but conflicting findings present the need for further research to understand how and when this process occurs. Here, we examine whether different encoding methods for learning emotional faces may result in different EEM patterns in those with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). A patient group (n = 28) and healthy comparisons (n = 29) encoded faces in two conditions that manipulated attentional focus to promote direct (emotion judgements) or indirect (sex discrimination) processing of emotional content. Based on literature in schizophrenia showing selective emotion perception deficits on tasks of direct processing but relatively intact emotion perception on indirect processing tasks, we hypothesized that patients would show greater EEM effects when faces were encoded indirectly. This hypothesis was not supported, and the patient group instead showed a similar intact EEM for angry and fearful faces to healthy comparisons in both encoding conditions. Further, using the Remember/Know paradigm, we demonstrated that the EEM in SSD appears selective to recollection-based memory, which helps to explain inconsistencies in past literature that has not differentiated between recognition domains. These findings have important implications for improving emotional memory and functional outcomes in SSD; future research should establish how the EEM for facial expressions may relate to social functioning.

Impairment of EEG functional connectivity in dementia during recognition of emotional facial expression

AbstractBackgroundThe performance of facial expression recognition is affected both in neurocognitive disorders and in healthy elderly. Emotional content processing is expected to be adversely affected in dementia and as well in Parkinson's disease patients. The present study aims to compare the impaired facial expression recognition between different types of dementia patients, functional connectivity changes in patients with mild cognitive impairment, and patients with dementia were investigated by event‐related EEG‐coherence.Method25 Healthy elderly controls (HC), 25 Mild Cognitive Impairment patients (MCI), 25 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), 15 patients with Parkinson's disease with Mild Cognitive Impairment (PDMCI), and 16 patients with Parkinson's disease Dementia (PDD) were included in the study. EEG was recorded while angry, happy, and neutral facial expressions were presented. The artifacts were rejected by using Independent‐Component‐Analysis and Current‐Source‐Density. Magnitude‐squared coherence values of theta (4‐7Hz, 50‐400ms) responses were calculated. Inter‐hemispheric and intra‐hemispheric (frontal and central centered) pairs of F3, F4, C3, C4, T7, T8, Tp7, Tp8, P3, P4, O1, O2 channels were used. Two separate inter and intra hemispheric repeated‐measures‐ANOVA models were used for group comparisons.ResultThere were no group differences for intra‐hemispheric comparisons, but GroupXLocation comparison (p=.040) was significant, HE and MCI groups had higher coherence values in central‐ temporal, central‐ temporoparietal, and central‐ occipital connections compared to PDMCI, PDD, and AD patient groups (Figure 1). FaceXGroup (p=.009) interaction was significant for inter‐hemispheric coherence values, HC and MCI groups had higher interhemispheric coherence values than the PDMCI, PDD, and AD, especially during recognition of "angry" facial expression.ConclusionThe connectivity between the central and posterior regions increased with emotional face content; this increase seems to be preserved in MCI. On the other hand, it wasn't maintained in patients with more severe neurocognitive impairment; PDMCI, PDD, and AD groups had reduced central‐posterior connectivity and interhemispheric connectivity during the facial expression recognition paradigm. The decrease in inter and intra‐connectivity in the posterior regions is consistent with behavioral scores and may indicate neural losses as a phenomenon.

Age differences in ventromedial prefrontal cortex functional connectivity during socioemotional content processing

Self-relevance effects are often confounded by the presence of emotional content, rendering it difficult to determine how brain networks functionally connected to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) are affected by the independent contributions of self-relevance and emotion. This difficulty is complicated by age-related changes in functional connectivity between the vmPFC and other default mode network regions, and regions typically associated with externally oriented networks. We asked groups of younger and older adults to imagine placing emotional and neutral objects in their home or a stranger's home. An age-invariant vmPFC cluster showed increased activation for self-relevant and emotional content processing. Functional connectivity analyses revealed age × self-relevance interactions in vmPFC connectivity with the anterior cingulate cortex. There were also age × emotion interactions in vmPFC functional connectivity with the anterior insula, orbitofrontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, and supramarginal gyrus. Interactions occurred in regions with the greatest differences between the age groups, as revealed by conjunction analyses. Implications of the findings are discussed.

How do Emotion Word Type and Valence Influence Language Processing? The Case of Arabic-English Bilinguals.

The current study examines the influence of word type (i.e., emotion-label vs. emotion-laden) and valence (i.e., positive vs. negative vs. neutral) on the processing of emotion words among bilinguals. To this end, three groups of Arabic-English bilinguals (n = 120 per group) completed the tasks of free recall, ratings for concreteness, imageability and context availability, and discrete word association. Two groups, representing different levels of second language (L2) exposure completed the tasks in English while the third group completed the tasks in Arabic. The results of the free recall and rating tasks generally supported the influence of word type, valence and L2 exposure on the processing of emotional content; namely, emotion-label vs. emotion-laden vs. neutral words and negative vs. positive emotion words generally behaved significantly differently, and the participants with increased L2 exposure usually outperformed the ones with less exposure. In contrast, the word association task often failed to present statistically significant findings. The results are interpreted in line with the specific nature of the Arabic mental lexicon, the existing literature, and relevant theoretical models of emotion and the bilingual mental lexicon. Directions for future research are proposed.

Language-based social feedback processing with randomized “senders”: An ERP study

ABSTRACTRecently, several event-related potential (ERP) studies investigated the impact of sender attributions on language-based social feedback processing. Results showed very early responses to the social context, while interactions or effects of emotional content started later. However, in these studies, sender attribution was varied across blocks, possibly inducing unspecific, anticipatory effects. Here, who was giving feedback was disclosed simultaneously with the decision itself.Participants’ ERPs differentiated between attributed senders starting with the early posterior negativity. P3 and late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes were also enlarged for the “human sender”. Emotion effects occurred in the P3 and LPP time windows. Further, we found an interaction on the P3: “Human” emotional feedback was selectively amplified. Source analysis localized enhanced processing of “human”-generated feedback in visual areas from around 300 ms after feedback onset and from 400 ms also in temporal regions. Enhancement of “human” emotional feedback resulted from increased activations in the left visual word form area.These findings highlight that decoding who is giving feedback precedes content processing, both in blocked and in randomly alternating situations. Further, in quasi-realistic social contexts, processing of emotional content is selectively amplified. Finally, involvement of semantic language processing structures indicates reintegration of words in a salient context.

Eye movement related brain responses to emotional scenes during free viewing

Emotional stimuli are preferentially processed over neutral stimuli. Previous studies, however, disagree on whether emotional stimuli capture attention preattentively or whether the processing advantage is dependent on allocation of attention. The present study investigated attention and emotion processes by measuring brain responses related to eye movement events while 11 participants viewed images selected from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). Brain responses to emotional stimuli were compared between serial and parallel presentation. An “emotional” set included one image with high positive or negative valence among neutral images. A “neutral” set comprised four neutral images. The participants were asked to indicate which picture—if any—was emotional and to rate that picture on valence and arousal. In the serial condition, the event-related potentials (ERPs) were time-locked to the stimulus onset. In the parallel condition, the ERPs were time-locked to the first eye entry on an image. The eye movement results showed facilitated processing of emotional, especially unpleasant information. The EEG results in both presentation conditions showed that the LPP (“late positive potential”) amplitudes at 400–500 ms were enlarged for the unpleasant and pleasant pictures as compared to neutral pictures. Moreover, the unpleasant scenes elicited stronger responses than pleasant scenes. The ERP results did not support parafoveal emotional processing, although the eye movement results suggested faster attention capture by emotional stimuli. Our findings, thus, suggested that emotional processing depends on overt attentional resources engaged in the processing of emotional content. The results also indicate that brain responses to emotional images can be analyzed time-locked to eye movement events, although the response amplitudes were larger during serial presentation.

The right hemisphere's contribution to emotional word processing in currently depressed, remitted depressed, and never-depressed individuals

To examine how unipolar depression influences hemispheric processing of emotional stimuli, words with clear affective content were assessed by depressed, remitted depressed, and never depressed participants. Semantic stimuli were selected for both their valence (positive vs. negative) and for their ability to engender affective arousal (high vs. low). After completing a structured clinical interview to determine depression experience, participants were asked to make valence judgements for laterally presented emotional words. Study results suggest that the right hemisphere (RH) is particularly sensitive to the affective semantic content of emotional stimuli, furthermore, two interesting higher order interactions were observed in the RH. First, in a replication of recent findings by Atchley et al. [2003. Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of emotional content in word meanings: The effect of current and past depression. Brain and Language, 84, 105–119], individuals who have experienced depression (both currently depressed and remitted depressed groups) show an advantage when processing negatively valent words, while the never depressed individuals show an advantage for positive words. Also in the RH, affective arousal interacted with stimulus valence (but not diagnostic group), such that all participants exhibited an advantage when categorizing highly arousing negative information, while for positive words the low arousing stimuli were identified more accurately. These results are discussed in the context of models of depressive cognition and in regards to general models of hemispheric specialization for emotion processing.

Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of emotional content in word meanings: The effect of current and past depression

We examined hemispheric lateralization of emotion processing by comparing the performance of clinically depressed, previously depressed, and control individuals on a divided visual field task. Participants were asked to make affective valence judgments for each in a series of laterally presented person-descriptive adjectives. Study results suggest that the right cerebral hemisphere (RH) is preferentially sensitive to the affective context of language. Among targets presented to the RH, depressed and previously depressed participants were significantly faster and more accurate in their judgments of negative target words, while controls responded more quickly and accurately to positive target words. No such effects were observed for targets presented to the left hemisphere. It is hypothesized that affective sensitivity may result in differences in semantic network organization across individuals who vary in affective experience.

An fMRI study investigating cognitive modulation of brain regions associated with emotional processing of visual stimuli

Brain regions modulated by cognitive tasks during emotional processing were investigated using fMRI. Participants performed indirect and direct emotional processing tasks on positive and negative faces and pictures. We used a multivariate technique, partial least squares (PLS) to determine spatially distributed patterns of brain activity associated with different tasks and stimulus conditions, as well as the interaction between the two. The pattern of brain activity accounting for the most task-related covariance represented a task×stimulus interaction and distinguished indirect processing of pictures and direct processing of faces from direct processing of pictures and indirect processing of faces. The latter two conditions were characterised by limbic (e.g. amygdala, insula, thalamus) and temporal lobe activity, in addition to greater activity in the ventral prefrontal cortex. Indirect and direct processing of pictures and faces, respectively, were represented by more dorsal prefrontal and parietal activity. These findings indicate that brain activity during processing of emotional content is critically dependent on both the type of stimulus and processing task. In addition, these results support the idea that the pattern of activity in the emotional network can be influenced in a ‘top–down’ fashion via cognitive factors such as attentional control, and as such, have important clinical implications for emotional disorders, such as depression and anxiety.