The process of culture formation As instructor in a graduate course in the history of science based on the study of the original works of the leading pioneers of science since its origins in Greek antiquity. I found it advisable to resort to an educational stratagem that served to stimulate the student’s interest in the subject. This artifice proved of significance beyond its original motive. The stratagem required that students look about them and select a dozen man-made items, name the inventor, place and date of origin, the reception accorded each, and the rate and extent of their diffusion. Since each student had to list twelve objects and also six concepts such as magnetism, gravity, hell, arteries, acceleration, ballads, dadaism, etc., each class produced quite a list of man’s cultural artifacts ranging from bricks, glass, cotton, buttons, paper, to electric lights, zippers, the alphabet, movable type, money, and dozens of conceptual terms. Among the inventors most frequently cited were Edison, Eli Whitney, Alexander Graham Bell, Ampere, Faraday, Gutenberg, Darwin, Shakespeare, Newton, Pasteur, Freud, Jonas Salk, and other prominent Olympians of modern science and the humanities. Each new school year enriched the pile of answer sheets although more than ninety percent of the items named lacked names of inventors, dates, and places of origin. Yet, what I learned served my purposes well enough because all participants came to realize that their unawareness of past gifts and benefactors of humanity revealed a universal weakness in human nature. It soon became apparent that essentially we were studying the historical growth of a culture under more or less verifiable conditions. Anthropologists have studied primitive cultures as they had found them, hence largely in the absence of sequential development. They could seldom record the mode of origin and spread of innovations or rites, or the group’s attitude toward the influx of one artifact or another or of concepts from neighboring cultures. In our own case, it seemed we were clearly studying certain aspects of our culture from within, which process could enable us to see phases of culture growth which conventional study had not observed. Our own had ample records of the conditions that prevailed at the time of an invention’s birth and its spread, of its psychological and social impact, of its acceptance or the resistance to it, and its fusion with established practices or beliefs. The lesson we garnered from our data was that every element of a culture is the brainchild of gifted individuals as a rule crystallized by the mind of a uniquely gifted one. Some modifications or additions may be the achievements of no particularly outstanding