ObjectiveClimate change is the single greatest threat to global human health, contributing to changes in disease patterns, water and food insecurity, vulnerability in shelter and human settlements, climatic volatility, and population growth and migration. Healthcare generates between 8 - 10% of all greenhouse gas emissions. Surgical care accounts for a significant proportion due to equipment and drug use, sterility requirements, and life support systems. There are currently minimal data describing this carbon consumption. The purpose of this study was to determine the carbon utilization of common vascular interventions and to identify variables associated with increased carbon utilization. MethodsWe conducted an observational study of all elective and urgent vascular surgery procedures performed at our institution in a two-month period in 2023. All waste generated was weighed and cataloged per hospital waste practices. Additional characteristics of the procedures were also collected. Carbon utilization was determined by applying DEFRA greenhouse gas life-cycle conversion factors to the mean waste produced. These factors take into account greenhouse gas emissions generated in the initial production and eventual disposal. Variables associated with increased carbon production were evaluated by linear regression models with log-transformed outcomes. Results59 procedures were included. Complex endovascular aortic procedures were the most carbon intensive (69.35kg CO2), equivalent to driving a medium-sized vehicle 369 kilometers. Dialysis access procedures (11.5kg CO2) and minor amputations (10.6kg CO2) were the least carbon intensive. Open surgical bypasses (28.4kg CO2) and cerebrovascular procedures (20.3kg CO2) produced a moderate amount of carbon. Endovascular interventions were 50% more carbon intensive than open interventions (95% CI: 28%, 77%; p <0.01). Aortic interventions were 63% more carbon intensive than non-aortic interventions (95% CI: 28%, 109%; p<0.01). In both models, there was nearly a half percent increase in carbon generated for each minute of additional operating time (p<0.01). Blood loss was not consistently associated with carbon utilization. ConclusionsClimate change is a major threat to human health. The environmental impact of day-to-day surgery is rarely considered but clearly significant. Larger procedures are associated with increased carbon utilization, particularly if they are endovascular or aortic. The duration of the case is also associated with increased utilization. Further work should be done to identify additional variables and opportunities for carbon reduction.