You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023PD14-04 OPTIMIZING ANTIBIOTIC USE IN THE TREATMENT OF OVERACTIVE BLADDER: EVALUATING THE NEED FOR PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS PRIOR TO ONABOTULINUMTOXINA INJECTION Justina Tam, Heng Ruan, Matthew Mikula, Hannah Koenig, Alvaro Lucioni, Wai Lee, Jason Kim, Una Lee, and Kathleen Kobashi Justina TamJustina Tam More articles by this author , Heng RuanHeng Ruan More articles by this author , Matthew MikulaMatthew Mikula More articles by this author , Hannah KoenigHannah Koenig More articles by this author , Alvaro LucioniAlvaro Lucioni More articles by this author , Wai LeeWai Lee More articles by this author , Jason KimJason Kim More articles by this author , Una LeeUna Lee More articles by this author , and Kathleen KobashiKathleen Kobashi More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003261.04AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX) is safe and efficacious in the treatment of neurogenic and non-neurogenic overactive bladder (OAB). Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a known potential adverse event. Published guidelines for cystoscopic procedures with manipulation recommend the use of prophylactic antibiotics, and prophylactic antibiotics are commonly administered pre-BTX. However, there is a paucity of data demonstrating that pre-procedural antibiotic administration decreases the rate of post-procedural UTI after BTX. In the era of antibiotic stewardship and avoidance of antibiotic overuse, we aimed to study the difference in UTI rates between patients asymptomatic for UTI who receive and do not receive antibiotics at the time of BTX in a prospective, randomized multi-institutional study. Here, we report our preliminary study results. METHODS: Patients with OAB undergoing BTX who were not symptomatic for UTI and had urinalysis demonstrating fewer than 2+ leukocyte esterase at the time of injection were randomized to receive either a single dose of pre-procedural prophylactic antibiotics or no antibiotics. Patients who had taken antibiotics within 48 hours of the procedure were excluded from study participation. Symptomatic UTIs within 2 weeks of injection was identified and recorded. Demographics and past medical history were recorded. RESULTS: Of 86 patients who have been enrolled, 40 were randomized to receive antibiotics, and 46 were randomized to not receive antibiotics. Table 1 summarizes the patient demographics, clinical history, and UTI rate. At 2-week follow up, a total of 4 patients developed UTI. One patient in the antibiotic group developed UTI, and 3 patients who did not receive antibiotics developed UTI. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results suggest that the use of a single dose of prophylactic antibiotic may not affect the rate of post-procedural UTI. Patient enrollment is ongoing to determine if these findings hold true in a larger patient cohort. Source of Funding: 2020 Society of Urodynamics Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogenital Reconstruction Foundation Grant © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e413 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Justina Tam More articles by this author Heng Ruan More articles by this author Matthew Mikula More articles by this author Hannah Koenig More articles by this author Alvaro Lucioni More articles by this author Wai Lee More articles by this author Jason Kim More articles by this author Una Lee More articles by this author Kathleen Kobashi More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract