Adult Education is more integrated into the general educational framework than ever before. Issues related to workplace learning, adult and family learning, continuing professional education, and international development are almost constantly before the public eye. Yet, we must continuously ask ourselves, what are the unique contributions of adult educators to the public discussion on these issues? More specifically, the question is, what does adult education do to help explicate the central problems facing those involved in any area of lifelong learning? Today's adult education research, as in the past, is primarily descriptive. This means that adult education research is still often based on a best practices model. Many articles describe particular programmatic enterprises in the spirit of sharing or diffusing innovations. While this is, of course, interesting to those working directly in the field, this type of does not lead to broader generalizations or applications of findings. On the other hand, there has been a shift in educational in general, away from broad sweeping generalizations, and a new interest in the particular contexts that serve as the basis for understanding any event or phenomenon. Hence thick description leading to analysis are now elevated to a principal goal of research. The question remains, how do we translate into actual practice? I would almost venture to say that we have given up on this goal and the aim is now to translate practice into research. What then, does this say about the entire adult education endeavor? Looking through American adult education journals, one is struck by the emphasis on reflection and theory and the seeming retreat from the use of data, in any form at all. Whereas this is by no means universal, the principal purpose appears to be to move practitioners into a problem identification and problem-solving mode. While this aim is commendable, it is built on a model of either burned out or overly theorized professionals who cling to inappropriate models in the face of continual frustration. Alternatively, it also applies to overworked professionals who are filled with theory, but somehow cannot learn how to apply it Somehow, the culture of those actively engaged in adult education efforts has been too often ignored. In fact, one of the things that is striking about adult education is the paucity of teacher or more generally, practitioner research. While this has been a fertile area of within education generally, adult education, with its exclusive focus on the learner has often bypassed this central aspect of the learning enterprise and has so far not really developed this area as much as possible. We have some first person accounts of how an individual experiences self-development and change, but little systematic study of the experience of teaching adults in a multiplicity of environments. When we approach research, we usually have specific questions that need to be addressed. The questions flow from practice, from other research, from something we observe in other fields. It does not really matter the source of the initial question. Of course, this beginning is not a sufficient basis for research, and here I believe is the central problem. We have a question that needs to be answered. We recognize the question arises from a particular context and therefore, the answer needs to come from the context as well. But then, for some reason, we are unable to adapt current to our own individual circumstances. Somehow, we fail to move beyond our own particular context thus inhibiting the utility of much in the field. We need to know not only what worked in a specific situation, but why it worked and it is here that adult education fails miserably Hence, the remains atomized and not generally constructive. Because of the fluidity of its self-definition, adult education has a difficult time building a body of knowledge. …