Abstract Participants performed a memory-scanning task (Steinberg, 1966, 1969a) in which probe letters were displayed unilaterally or bilaterally after sets of two, four, or six letters were memorized. The mean response time (RT) to bilateral presentations was significantly longer than the mean RT to unilateral presentations, but the slope of the set-size function was not affected, suggesting that presenting stimuli bilaterally affected stages other than memory scanning. There were no significant visual-field effects in either the bilateral or unilateral conditions, suggesting that memory scanning is not a lateralized process. There was no evidence that bilateral presentation increased visual-field differences. This is not consistent with Boles' (1983, 1990) hypothesis that visual-field asymmetry effects are more pronounced with bilateral than with unilateral presentation of stimuli. Two methods are often used to assess visual-field differences in perception. One is the unilateral method, which involves presenting a single stimulus either in the left or the right visual field. A less frequently used method is bilateral presentation of stimuli, which involves presenting two different stimuli, one in each visual field, with an indication to the subject as to which stimulus to respond to. A response time (RT) or accuracy advantage for a visual field is then taken to indicate contralateral hemispheric specialization for the task. Boles (1983, 1990) has claimed that bilateral presentations of stimuli produce visual-field asymmetries larger than those of unilateral presentations. His explanation for this effect is that bilateral stimulation effectively disrupts communication between the two hemispheres, preventing information transfer. If information cannot be transferred between the hemispheres, each hemisphere's capability can be assessed more accurately, and any hemispheric differences would be accentuated. In the experiment reported here, subjects performed a memory-scanning task (Sternberg, 1966, 1969a) in which probe stimuli were presented both unilaterally and bilaterally. In a typical memory-scanning task, subjects memorize a set of between one and seven items and then decide whether a probe item is in the memorized list. Sternberg found that RT increased linearly with the number of items in the set and that the slope of this function was the same for Yes and No responses, which was taken to suggest that subjects perform an exhaustive, serial memory scan. Sternberg (1966) elaborated his memory-scanning theory by differentiating among four stages of processing: stimulus encoding, memory scanning, response selection, and response execution. The zero-intercept of the linear set size function is a measure of the total duration of all processes that occur just once, regardless of the size of the memory set -- that is, stimulus encoding, response selection, and execution. The slope, on the other hand, measures the rate at which members of the memory set are scanned. Introducing a new factor in a memory-scanning experiment could influence the RT function in two ways. It could influence the memory-scanning stage only, reflected in a change in slope and not in the zero-intercept. Alternatively, it might influence the stimulus encoding, response selection or execution stages, altering the zero-intercept and not the slope. The aim of the present experiment was to investigate the effect of bilateral stimulus presentation on memory scanning. Two different aspects were of interest. The first had to do with the effects that bilateral as opposed to unilateral presentation has on the different stages of a memory-scanning task. If bilateral and unilateral presentation have different effects on the memory-scanning stage, it would be reflected in a difference in slopes for unilateral and bilateral presentations. Alternatively, if presenting stimuli bilaterally only had an effect on stages other than memory scanning, there would be only an intercept difference between unilateral and bilateral presentations. …