The Department of Defense processed 83,173 FOIA requests in 1985; Health and Human Services had 105,687 requests, with 45,953 to the Food and Drug Administration; Treasury had 23,217 and the Department of Energy, 5,723. An estimated 91 percent of all requests were completely filled. Requests are wideranging. A research assistant at a California college and a newspaper reporter in Oregon asked the Department of Energy for detailed information on the Nuclear Emergency Search Team (NEST). A Maryland-based consulting firm asked the Navy for copies of procurement contracts. A Japanese firm in Kyobashi wanted a copy of an application for a drug dealing with antiarrythmia. An inmate in a mid-western prison asked the Army for instructions on making a bomb and advice on where to place it to blow up Denver. A hospital in Massachusetts requested a Quality Assurance Profile conducted by the FDA.' The management of FOIA and the way we think about information have both changed during the past 20 years. Government information in the 1980s has become a tangible commodity with a dollar value. Information Management is being defined as a multi-faceted process involving the collection, processing, storage, transmission, and use of Each facet is governed by different regulations. Businesses have become major requesters; submitters of information are seeking new protections for their data; the costs of providing information have been significantly higher than Congress anticipated. The Executive branch and a number of legislators are advocating that requesters pay for the records they receive as well as their value. For example, the proposed Senate bill to amend the FOIA (S.150) would permit agencies to charge a fair value fee or royalties for government records containing commercially valuable technological information. But there is little guidance on how to price the future value of Some argue that too much government information is being released harming government decision making and intelligence gathering as well as private sector competition. Others claim that access to government information is being sharply curtailed, damaging scientific exchange, research, and democratic processes. The focus of this discussion is the management of FOIA, but this is inextricably entwined in the larger question of information policy. The historical context out of which FOIA evolved is sketched first. Next, the way in which FOIA has been implemented and managed, is examined, with attention to how selected agencies have balanced the conflicting demands of Congress and the executive branch against their own goals