Prior Therapy Research Articles

INNV-07. IVOSIDENIB AND BEVACIZUMAB IN HEAVILY PRETREATED PATIENTS WITH IDH1 MUTANT GLIOMAS

Abstract Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) inhibitors are transforming the treatment of patients with non-enhancing IDH1 mutant gliomas that have only undergone surgical resection. Questions remain on the utility of IDH1 inhibitors in patients that have received prior therapies such as radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy (e.g. temozolomide (TMZ)) and have progressive disease. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ivosidenib, an oral IDH1 inhibitor, in combination with bevacizumab (BEV), a monoclonal antibody targeting VEGF-A, in IDH1 mutant glioma patients that were heavily pretreated. Fourteen patients received combination ivosidenib and bevacizumab starting between February 2021 to July 2023. In our small cohort, patient age range was 26 to 73 years with seven female patients and seven male patients. Diagnoses represented were astrocytoma, IDH1 mutant (n=10) and oligodendroglioma, IDH1 mutant (n=4). At the time of IDH1 therapy initiation, the majority of patients (n=10) had a grade 3 tumor. All patients (n=14) had canonical IDH1 mutation (p.Arg132His) and had enhancing disease. Therapies initiated prior to ivosidenib therapy included: prior RT (n=12), prior TMZ (n=14) and prior BEV (n=10). The median number of progressions prior to initiation of ivosidenib combination therapy was 3 (range 2 to 6). All patients received ivosidenib dosed at 500 mg daily with bevacizumab doses varying from 5 to 15 mg/kg IV dosed every 2 to 3 weeks. Combination therapy was well tolerated with minimal patients experiencing toxicities requiring dose interruptions; diarrhea (n=2), creatine phosphokinase elevations (n=1), QTc prolongation (n=1), and thrombocytopenia (n=1). The median treatment duration on ivosidenib combination therapy was 4.42 months (range 0.69 to 11.4 months). In this cohort, the combination of ivosidenib and bevacizumab was well tolerated. More information is needed on the benefit of ivosidenib in combination with other therapies and in heavily pretreated patients with IDH1 mutant gliomas.

CTNI-68. UPDATES ON A POTENTIALLY PIVOTAL TRIAL CNS-201: A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF BERUBICIN VS. LOMUSTINE AFTER FIRST-LINE THERAPY FOR GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME (GBM)

Abstract Berubicin, derived from doxorubicin (Dox), appears to cross the BBB and has shown significant central nervous system (CNS) uptake and anti-tumor activity. A current, potentially pivotal trial for patients with recurrent GBM after first-line therapy has completed enrollment in the US and Europe: a total of 252 patients were randomized 2:1 (Berubicin:Lomustine) after failure of prior therapy. All patients had to have certification of progression by a central reader, were Grade 4 IDH WT, and were stratified by MGMT methylation status. The primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), is maturing in this blinded trial; however, data will be presented that will document the demographics of the Berubicin and Lomustine arms, and provide a comparison of safety profiles and disposition of the patients enrolled on the study. Recently, a pre-planned non-binding futility analysis of the primary endpoint, OS, was evaluated when the trial reached ~30% of expected events (44 events). This interim analysis was performed by an independent statistician under the supervision of the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), which was additionally comprised of two oncologists. The DSMB’s charter mandated that they review the primary endpoint, OS, as well as secondary endpoints and safety data to determine whether these data for the risk-benefit profile warranted modification or discontinuation of the study. The DSMB recommended that the study continue as it was currently planned, with no modifications required, having met a pre-determined conditional endpoint. After the results of this interim analysis, CNS Pharmaceuticals completed enrollment with 252 patients evaluable for efficacy based on OS evaluations. Based on the decision of the DSMB, as well as the data presented herein, which includes comparative safety and balanced randomization of the arms, we will provide our recommendations and highlight our further development of Berubicin as a therapeutic option for patients with recurrent GBM as well as other CNS malignancies.

Efficacy and safety of teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To synthesize the evidence on the efficacy and safety of teclistamab in treating relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). A systematic search for records published from inception until June 2024 was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases. Five studies with 661 RRMM patients were included in the analysis. The pooled results showed that teclistamab led to an overall response rate (ORR) of 62.8% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 58.6-66.8), a ≥ very good partial response or better (VGPR) of 52.1% (95% CI: 46.8-57.3), and a ≥ complete response or better (CR) of 29.5% (95% CI: 21.9-38.4). When the ORR was assessed in different subgroups, we found that patients with extramedullary disease (EMD) had considerably lower ORR than those without EMD (45% vs. 71%, p < 0.0001). The ORR was significantly lower in patients with prior (B-cell maturation antigen) BCMA-directed therapy (OR: 2.24, p = 0.002) and those with stage III disease (OR: 3.69, p = 0.0001). However, the subgroup analyses showed no considerable difference in the ORR between patients with high or standard-risk cytogenetics (OR: 1.05 p = 0.82) and those with penta-drug or triple-class-refractory disease (OR: 0.97 p = 0.89). Regarding the safety of teclistamab, the pooled results showed that the incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was high (90.7%). However, grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxic events were low (1.5% and 2.2%, respectively). RRMM patients treated with teclistamab display good response rates.

Randomized Phase II Study of Durvalumab with or without Tremelimumab in Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is overexpressed by dendritic cells in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing on androgen receptor pathway inhibitors. We tested whether checkpoint blockade could enhance antitumor activity in mCRPC. In a multicenter open-label non-comparative randomized phase II study, patients with mCRPC treated with £ 1 prior cytotoxic chemotherapy, with measurable disease and progression on abiraterone and/or enzalutamide were randomized to durvalumab (D) 1500mg IV Q4 weeks ± 4 doses of tremelimumab (T) 75mg IV. The primary endpoint was objective response (OR) by iRECIST using a Simon 2-stage design. Correlative testing included PD-L1/CD8 immunohistochemistry on baseline tumour biopsies and deep targeted sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA. 52 patients were enrolled. Median age was 70 years (range, 50-83 years) and 52% had prior taxane therapy for mCRPC. In stage 1, 13 patients were randomized to D with no OR observed. D+T advanced to stage 2 with 39 patients enrolled (receiving a median 3 cycles, range 1-53). D+T related adverse events (AEs) were mainly £ grade 2 but led to discontinuation in 7 patients . There were seven OR (19.4% [95% confidence interval: 8.2-36.0%]; intention to treat (ITT) 17.9% [95% confidence interval: 7.5-33.5%]). Five responding tumours were PD-L1 positive and two exhibited DNA damage repair defects. Responses were observed without high tumour mutational burden or other genomic indices of immunotherapy sensitivity. D+T is active in mCRPC but patient selection remains a challenge. Further studies to develop predictive biomarkers are warranted.

Equecabtagene Autoleucel in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Equecabtagene autoleucel (eque-cel), a fully human-derived B-cell maturation antigen-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, has exhibited potential for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), and further investigation in a larger cohort is necessary. To evaluate whether eque-cel can benefit patients with RRMM and determine the overall response rate postinfusion. The FUMANBA-1 trial was a single-arm, open-label, phase 1b/2 trial that evaluated eque-cel in adult patients with RRMM. Enrollment began in April 2020, and patients who received eque-cel will be monitored for a minimum of 15 years following the infusion. As of September 2022, patients with heavily pretreated RRMM who received at least 3 prior courses of therapy from 14 centers were enrolled. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to September 2022. Patients received a single infusion of eque-cel at 1.0 × 106 CAR-positive T cells/kg after the lymphodepletion. Efficacy was the primary objective, and safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were secondary objectives. Of 103 patients who received an eque-cel infusion, 55 (53.4%) were male, and the median (range) age was 58 (39-70) years. A total of 101 patients were evaluable for efficacy. At a median (range) follow-up of 13.8 (0.4-27.2) months, the overall response rate was 96.0% (97 of 101), with 74.3% (75 of 103) achieving a complete response or better. Among the 12 patients who had prior CAR T-cell treatment, 75% (9 of 12) achieved a response. The median progression-free survival was not reached, with a 12-month progression-free survival rate of 78.8% (95% CI, 68.6-86.0). A total of 96 patients (95.0%) achieved minimal residual disease negativity at a sensitivity threshold of 10-5. Adverse events were favorable: 96 of 103 patients (93.2%) experienced cytokine release syndrome (grade 1 to 2 in 95 patients [92.3%]) and 2 (1.9%) experienced immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (grade 1 to 2). All cases of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome and 94 of 96 cases of cytokine release syndrome resolved with treatment. Additionally, only 20 patients (19.4%) developed antidrug antibodies. Cellular kinetic analysis confirmed CAR-positive T cells in all patients, with the longest duration at 735 days. In this trial, eque-cel led to early, deep, and durable responses in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM with a manageable safety profile. Patients with prior CAR T-cell therapy also benefitted from eque-cel. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000033946.

Blood Loss in Women of Childbearing Potential Taking Oral Anticoagulants for Venous Thromboembolism (The BLEED Study).

Oral anticoagulants (OAC) may exacerbate menstrual bleeding in women of childbearing age; however, the existing literature on this issue has several limitations. This study investigates abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in women of childbearing age taking oral anticoagulants-Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC)-for venous thromboembolism through a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Uterine bleeding was assessed using the Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) and hemoglobin (Hb) values during anticoagulation compared to prior therapy. The number of unplanned medical visits for bleeding complications was also calculated. From June 2014 to November 2023, 110 women were recruited (median age, 36 years). PBAC scores correlated with Hb values at baseline and during therapy (ANOVA, p<0.01), with a significant difference in Hb values before and during anticoagulant therapy (Δ Hb) among groups (ANOVA, p=0.034). Seventeen women (15.4%) reported fibroids, experiencing a greater reduction in Hb values during anticoagulant administration than women without fibroids (Δ 0.3, IQR -0.8, 2.9 vs -0.5, IQR -1.2, 0.3; p=0.012). Women with fibroids required more frequent unplanned medical consultations for bleeding (mean visits 5 vs 4 respectively; Poisson regression, p<0.05). Among women with fibroids, those taking apixaban showed smaller Hb changes than those on other oral anticoagulants (ANOVA, p=0.047). This difference persisted even after adjusting for potential confounders (MANOVA, p=0.004). Women of childbearing potential taking OAC frequently experience changes in Hb values and PBAC scores during treatment, with fibroids playing a significant role.

Lipoprotein (a) Testing in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in 5 Large US Health Systems.

Lipoprotein (a) is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, lipoprotein (a) testing remains variable and it is unclear what factors influence testing and if testing changes clinical management. A retrospective study using electronic medical record data from 5 health systems identified an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease cohort divided into those with and without a lipoprotein (a) test between 2019 and 2021. Baseline characteristics and lipid-lowering therapy patterns were assessed. Multivariable regression modeling was used to determine factors associated with lipoprotein (a) testing. Among 595 684 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, only 2587 (0.4%) were tested for lipoprotein (a). Those who were older or Black individuals were less likely to have lipoprotein (a) testing, while those with familial hypercholesterolemia, ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, peripheral artery disease, prior lipid-lowering therapy, or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥130 mg/dL were more likely to be tested. Those with a lipoprotein (a) test, regardless of the lipoprotein (a) value, were more frequently initiated on any statin therapy (30.3% versus 10.6%, P < 0.001), ezetimibe (7.65% versus 0.8%, P < 0.001), or proprotein convertase substilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (6.7% versus 0.3%, P < 0.001) compared with those without a test. Those with an elevated lipoprotein (a) level more frequently initiated ezetimibe (11.5% versus 5.9%, P < 0.001) or proprotein convertase substilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (10.9% versus 4.8%, P < 0.001). Lipoprotein (a) testing in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is infrequent, with evidence of disparities among older or Black individuals. Testing for lipoprotein (a), regardless of level, is associated with greater initiation of any lipid-lowering therapy, while elevated lipoprotein (a) is associated with greater initiation of nonstatin lipid-lowering therapy. There is a critical need for multidisciplinary and inclusive approaches to raise awareness for lipoprotein (a) testing, and its implications on management.

Utilization management and physician burnout.

This study was designed to assess physician experiences with utilization management and burnout and investigate whether they are linked. We conducted an electronic survey with items related to demographics, profession, utilization management, burnout, and potential policy solutions. The survey was sent to 7222 physicians working in outpatient settings who were recruited from a large, opt-in database. Outcome measures were responses to categorical and Likert-style survey items related to demographics, utilization management, burnout, and potential policy solutions. Of 7222 requests sent, 501 physicians completed the survey and were included in the final data set (77% men; mean [SD] age, 57 [9.8] years; mean [SD] years in practice, 24 [8.9]). Of these, 200 were general practitioners and 301 were nonhospital specialists. Physicians indicated that utilization management procedures for prior authorization (81%), step therapy (79%), and nonmedical switching (69%) were major or significant barriers to their clinical and patient care. More than half (52%) reported spending 6 to 21 or more hours per week on paperwork related to health insurance utilization management, 67% had experienced burnout at some point in their careers, and 64% indicated that utilization management had been a contributing factor to feelings of burnout, with an additional 8% citing it as the main factor. Physicians favored streamlining prior authorization practice (77%), requiring step therapy to be based on science (73%), and ensuring that peer-to-peer reviews are done by qualified medical experts (67%). These findings indicate that utilization management has a detrimental impact on physicians and patient care and contributes to physician burnout.

Leveraging machine learning for preoperative prediction of supramaximal ablation in laser interstitial thermal therapy for brain tumors.

Maximizing safe resection in neuro-oncology has become paramount to improving patient survival and outcomes. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) offers similar survival benefits to traditional resection, alongside shorter hospital stays and faster recovery times. The extent of ablation (EOA) achieved using LITT is linked to patient outcomes, with greater EOA correlating with improved outcomes. However, the preoperative predictors for achieving supramaximal ablation (EOA ≥ 100%) are not well understood. By leveraging machine learning (ML) techniques, this study aimed to identify these predictors to enhance patient selection and therefore outcomes. The objective was to explore preoperative predictors for supramaximal EOA using ML in patients with glioblastoma. A retrospective study was conducted on the medical records of 254 patients undergoing LITT from 2013 to 2023 at a single tertiary center. Cohort criteria included age ≥ 18 years, diagnosis of glioblastoma, single-trajectory ablation, and a complete dataset. The study assessed preoperative clinical and radiographic factors, using EOA ≥ 100% as the endpoint. Five ML models were used: logistic regression, random forest (RF), gradient boosting, Gaussian naive Bayes, and support vector machine. Training and testing cohorts were subsequently assessed across ML models with fivefold cross-validation. Models were optimized using hyperparameter tuning. Performance was primarily quantified using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve. The final cohort consisted of 72 patients. Among the ML models, RF achieved the highest AUC (mean ± SD 0.94 ± 0.06). The leading models identified that lower preoperative volume, history of prior radiation therapy, history of prior craniotomy, preoperative neurological deficits, history of preoperative seizures, and distance from intracranial heat sinks were predictive of successful ablations in patients. Additionally, RF had the best mean metrics: accuracy 0.88, precision 0.87, specificity 0.87, and sensitivity 0.89. This is the first study to investigate the role of ML for optimizing ablation volumes in LITT. These ML models suggest that low preoperative volumes, previous craniotomy, previous radiation therapy, no previous neurological deficits, larger catheter-heat sink distance, and the presence of preoperative seizures are important prognostic factors for predicting successful supramaximal ablations with LITT.

Evaluation of HRR (Hemoglobin/Red Blood Cell Distribution Width Ratio) and RAR (Red Blood Cell Distribution Width/Albumin Ratio) in Myocarditis Patients: Associations with Various Clinical Parameters.

This study investigates the prognostic value of the Hemoglobin/Red Blood Cell Distribution Width Ratio (HRR) and the Red Blood Cell Distribution Width/Albumin Ratio (RAR) in patients with myocarditis. We aimed to evaluate how these novel biomarkers correlate with clinical parameters, disease severity, and outcomes. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 301 patients diagnosed with myocarditis between January 2020 and March 2024. Inclusion criteria were adults with confirmed myocarditis based on clinical, ECG and echocardiographic evaluations. Exclusion criteria included incomplete records and prior immunosuppressive therapy. We assessed various blood parameters, including HRR and RAR, and analyzed their associations with clinical outcomes, hospital stay duration, and complications. The study found that HRR and RAR were significantly associated with several clinical outcomes in myocarditis patients. Higher HRR values correlated with improved outcomes, while higher RAR values were linked to worse outcomes. HRR was associated with pericardial effusion, inotropic support, and other parameters, while RAR was correlated with similar factors, including recent gastroenteritis. Patients with longer hospital stays exhibited higher inflammation markers and lower ejection fractions, underscoring the severity of their condition. HRR and RAR are promising biomarkers for assessing disease severity and prognosis in myocarditis. They provide additional prognostic information beyond traditional markers such as troponin and CRP, potentially guiding more personalized treatment strategies.

Post-hoc analyses from the ADAPT clinical study demonstrate aggregate sustained benefit of Efgartigimod in generalized myasthenia gravis

ObjectivesThis post-hoc analysis evaluates the long-term efficacy of efgartigimod versus placebo in adult patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) with acetylcholine-receptor autoantibodies (AChR-Ab+), based on data from the ADAPT RCT and its open-label extension ADAPT+. MethodsChanges from baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) and Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores were assessed by treatment group over the ADAPT (up to 20 weeks) and ADAPT+ time horizon (extended to 64 weeks for efgartigimod group patients). Response to treatment was defined as (Meriggioli, 2009 [3])5-point reduction in QMG or (Meriggioli, 2009 [3])3-point reduction in MG-ADL vs. baseline values. ResultsAChR-Ab+ patients treated with efgartigimod spent a substantially greater percentage of time in response in ADAPT based on at least a 5-point change in QMG compared to the placebo group (44 % versus 13 % respectively, p = 0.0034). Analyses based on a 3-point change in MG-ADL in ADAPT showed the percentage of time in response was nearly double for efgartigimod versus placebo (59 % versus 30 % respectively, p = 0.010). These trends were also maintained using different response definitions, as well as in patients with and without prior immune therapy exposure and by time from diagnosis (<7 years versus ≥7 years). ConclusionsThe clinical benefit of efgartigimod was sustained over repeat treatment cycles and maintained over the long term. Response to treatment was consistent regardless of response definition and was repeated in different patient subgroups. Overall, the results of this analysis indicate that efgartigimod is an effective therapeutic option, demonstrating a robust benefit among AChR-Ab+ patients with gMG.

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has less efficacy in Richter transformation than in de novo large B-cell lymphoma and transformed low-grade B-cell lymphoma.

The activity of anti-CD19 chimerci antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with Richter's transformation (RT) to aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is largely unknown. In a multicenter retrospective study, we report the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with RT (N=30) compared to patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma (N=283) and patients with transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) (N=141) between April 2016 and January 2023. Two-thirds of patients received prior therapy for CLL before RT and 89% of them received B-cell receptor and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors. Toxicities of CAR T-cell therapy in RT were similar to other lymphomas, with no fatalities related to cytokine release syndrome or immune effector-cell associated neurotoxicity synderome. The 100-day overall response rate and complete response rates in patients with RT were 57% and 47%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 19 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 months in patients with RT compared to 18 months in de novo LBCL and not reached in patients with transformed iNHL. The OS at 12 months was 45% in patients with RT compared with 62% and 75% in patients with de novo LBCL and transformed iNHL, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, worse OS was associated with RT histology, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and more prior lines of therapy. CAR T-cell therapy can salvage a proportion of patients with CLL and RT exposed to prior targeted agents; however, efficacy in RT is inferior compared to de novo LBCL and transformed iNHL.

Predictors of wound healing after surgical deroofing in Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

Surgical deroofing is an essential part of ongoing management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa, including persistent lesions non-responsive to medical therapy. The variables associated with delayed wound healing after surgical deroofing are contradictory within the literature due to the inclusion of heterogeneous surgical intervention methods. We aimed to assess the predictors of time to wound healing after surgical deroofing in HS. Patients who underwent in-office surgical deroofing between 2020 and 2024 at a single tertiary HS referral centre were included in analysis. Demographic, disease and blood variables were collected as per standard of care. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate correlation, with multiple regression performed to explore the interactions between variables and identify variables predictive of time to wound healing. A total of 270 individuals were included in the analysis. The median time to wound healing was 9.6 weeks with a range from 4 to 22 weeks. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significant differences with the log rank test when comparing biologic use versus no use, normal versus abnormal CRP and normal versus abnormal haemoglobin. Cox regression analysis identified biologic use with a significant hazard ratio compared to no biologic therapy (HR = 2.512, p < 0.0001) along with baseline CRP (HR = 0.968, p < 0.0001) and baseline haemoglobin (HR = 1.052, p < 0.001). Time to wound healing after in-office deroofing can be decreased with prior biologic therapy and markers of systemic inflammation in blood are also significantly associated with delays in healing. This correlates well with the existing literature promoting concurrent medical and surgical therapy to improve patient outcomes in HS.

Real-World Evaluation of Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Costs, and Healthcare Resource Utilization Among Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the US Receiving Sotorasib.

Sotorasib was the first drug approved for adults with Kirsten rat sarcoma G12C-mutated locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received prior systemic therapy in the US. This study aimed to provide initial real-world evidence on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and healthcare costs (HCC) associated with sotorasib in US clinical practice. A retrospective observational study was conducted using the Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart US claims database spanning January 2016 to March 2023. The study population included adults with a diagnosis of lung cancer (diagnosis (Dx) date), claims for sotorasib on/post-Dx date (index date), Continuous enrollment for medical/pharmacy benefits from 180 days pre-Dx date to≥30 days post-index date was required. Patients receiving treatments for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) pre-index were excluded. Outcomes were analyzed for patients receiving sotorasib as second or subsequent line (2L+) treatment and included adherence [proportion of days covered (PDC)], treatment duration, time to next treatment (TTNT), HCRU, and HCC during sotorasib treatment. Among 169 patients with lung cancer that met all inclusion criteria, 140 patients received sotorasib as 2L+ treatment (mean age: 71 years; 67.1% females). Mean PDC for sotorasib was 94.9%. Kaplan-Meier median treatment duration was 4.3 months. Median TTNT in patients with subsequent treatment (n=31) was 6.8 months. During sotorasib treatment, patients had a mean 3.87 outpatient, 0.09 inpatient, and 0.11 emergency visits per month. Mean monthly HCC during sotorasib treatment were US$23,063 versus $25,541 during the 180-day pre-index period. Patients in the US receiving sotorasib as 2L+ therapy for NSCLC in real-world clinical practice showed high adherence, TTNT comparable to progression-free survival observed in clinical trials, and HCC similar to those immediately prior to treatment demonstrating real-world benefits with no additional impact on healthcare resources with sotorasib.

Combination of moderate-intensity statins and ezetimibe versus high-intensity statins alone for primary prevention of cardiovascular events

Abstract Background Combination of a moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe can lead to similar reductions in cardiovascular events as monotherapy with a high-intensity statin in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The comparative effectiveness of these two cholesterol-lowering strategies in the primary prevention setting is unknown. Purpose To compare incident ASCVD events associated with a combination of moderate-intensity statin and ezetimibe versus monotherapy with a high-intensity statin in adults without prior history of cardiovascular disease. Methods We conducted a new-user active comparator retrospective population-based cohort study in Canada. We included all adults aged ≥ 67 years (eligible for drug coverage) with a first prescription of either a combination of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe ("combination therapy") or high-intensity statin alone between January 2010 and December 2022. Patients were excluded if they had not received any prior lipid lowering therapies or had a history of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease or prior coronary revascularisation at any time before or within 3 months of treatment initiation. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, hospitalization for MI or stroke, or coronary revascularization. An inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score was used to account for confounding (demographics, comorbidities, laboratory tests, other medications). Results Among 67,884 patients (mean age: 74.0±5.5y; 53% females), 8,798 (13%) initiated combination therapy and 59,086 (87%) initiated a high-intensity statin. At 1 year, after weighting, the mean achieved LDL-C was ~1.9 mmol/L in both groups. The median follow-up was 6.5 years. The cumulative incidence of the primary outcome at 10 years in the weighted cohort was 32.7% in the combination therapy group and 36.1% in the high-intensity statin group (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.82 to 0.92; p&amp;lt;0.001; absolute risk reduction: 3.5%; 95% CI: 0.8 to 6.1; Figure 1). This result was primarily driven by a lower risk of all-cause death (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.91; p&amp;lt;0.001; Figure 2) and stroke (cause-specific [cs] HR: 0.86; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.99; p=0.04), whereas no differences were observed in the risk of MI (csHR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.15) or coronary revascularization (csHR: 0.97; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.11). Conclusion The combination of moderate-intensity statins with ezetimibe was associated with a lower risk of incident ASCVD compared with high-intensity statins alone among primary prevention patients in a real-world setting. These results were driven by a lower risk of all-cause death and stroke, but not coronary events. The influence of statin intolerance on the allocated strategy and adherence to therapy cannot be addressed in this analysis, which, along with verifying these estimates, may be best determined in a prospective randomized trial.

Efficacy of vortioxetine versus desvenlafaxine in the treatment of functional impairment in patients with major depressive disorder: Results from the multinational VIVRE study.

In VIVRE (NCT04448431), vortioxetine was associated with significantly higher rates of symptomatic and functional remission, better daily and social functioning, and greater treatment satisfaction than desvenlafaxine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and partial response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy. This analysis further explored the relative improvement in patient functioning with vortioxetine versus desvenlafaxine. VIVRE was a randomized, double-blind study of vortioxetine (10 or 20mg/day) versus desvenlafaxine (50mg/day) in adults with MDD and partial response to initial SSRI monotherapy. Mean percentage changes from baseline to week 8 in Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) total and domain scores were analyzed by treatment group in the overall population and in working patients. In the overall population, the mean reduction in FAST total score from baseline after 8weeks of treatment was 37.2% in vortioxetine-treated patients versus 31.8% in desvenlafaxine-treated patients (P=0.04). Significantly greater improvements versus desvenlafaxine were seen in vortioxetine-treated patients for FAST autonomy, cognitive functioning, and interpersonal-relationships scores (all P<0.05). In working patients, the mean reduction in FAST total score from baseline at week 8 was 38.7% versus 32.1% in the vortioxetine and desvenlafaxine groups, respectively (P=0.04). Significant correlations were seen between absolute changes in patient functioning, and those in depression severity and health-related quality of life. Vortioxetine was significantly better than desvenlafaxine in improving overall functioning as well as daily, social, and cognitive functioning in patients with MDD with inadequate response to prior SSRI therapy.

Outcome of Endometriosis Treatment In Infertile Patients In A Tertiary Level Hospital

Introduction: Prevalence of endometriosis is 6-10% in reproductive-age females. Around 25-35% of infertile women may be affected by endometriosis. Modalities of treatment for infertile patients depends on the stage of the disease. It starts from ovulation inducing drug to advanced ART. The objective of this study was to assess the outcome of surgical treatment in infertile, endometriosis patients. Materials and Methods: It was an observational study, which was conducted at Reproductive Endocrinology and infertility Unit, Dhaka Medical College. Total 144 patients were included during July 2018 to July 2021, aged 20-40 yrs. All the demographic variables, clinical and sonographic findings, and hormonal assessment were done. Then, staging was done by clinical pelvic assessment, and ultrasonographic findings. Patients who had ovarian endometrioma, more than 4 cm, were selected for laparoscopic surgery. In patients whose endometrioma was less than 4 cm, or had no ovarian endometrioma, were selected for ovulation induction with or without prior GnRH agonist therapy. Further infertility management were planned according to ovarian reserve, tubal patency, and male factor. Result: Mean age of the patients were 28.30±4.95 yrs. 75.0% patients had primary infertility. Dysmenorrhea was the most common symptom (86.96%), followed by chronic pelvic pain (81.16%). Bilaterality of endometrioma was associated with decreased serum AMH. Laparoscopic surgery was the mainstay of treatment, Cystectomy was done in 58% patients. Conservative treatment was done in remaining patients. Fertility enhancing treatment was done by ovulation inducing drug -letrozole, GnRH agonist, followed by controlled ovarian stimulation and followed by IUI. IVF was advised for fertility management in 26patients (18.06%). Conclusion: Endometriosis is not only associated with decreased ovarian reserve but also responsible for diminished response to ovarian stimulation. So, it is a great challenge to obtain successful fertility treatment for this group of patients. J Dhaka Med Coll. 2023; 32(1) : 9-15

Long-term 3-year follow-up of mosunetuzumab in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma after ≥2 prior therapies

AbstractMosunetuzumab, a CD20×CD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody, redirects T cells to eliminate malignant B cells. We present updated efficacy and safety data of a pivotal phase 1/2 study after a median follow-up of 37.4 months in 90 patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) and ≥2 prior lines of therapy treated with fixed-duration mosunetuzumab. Investigator-assessed complete response (CR) rate and objective response rate were 60.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.1-70.2) and 77.8% (95% CI, 67.8-85.9), respectively. Among 70 responders, median duration of response was 35.9 months (95% CI, 20.7 to not estimable [NE]). Among 54 patients who achieved CR, 49 remained in CR at the end of treatment; median duration of CR was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 33.0 to NE); Kaplan-Meier-estimated 30-month remission rate was 72.4% (95% CI, 59.2-85.6). Estimated 36-month overall survival (OS) rate was 82.4% (95% CI, 73.8-91.0); median OS was NR (95% CI, NE to NE). Median progression-free survival was 24.0 months (95% CI, 12.0 to NE). Median time to CD19+ B-cell recovery was 18.4 months (95% CI, 12.8-25.0) after 8 cycles of mosunetuzumab treatment. No new cytokine release syndrome events or fatal, serious, or grade ≥3 adverse events were reported. With extended follow-up, mosunetuzumab demonstrated high response rates, durable remissions, and manageable safety with no long-term concerns. This supports outpatient mosunetuzumab administration as an off-the-shelf, fixed-duration, safe, and effective treatment for patients with R/R FL, including those with high-risk disease. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02500407.

HLX07 alone or combined with serplulimab, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A phase 2 study.

The combination of anti-PD-1 antibody serplulimab and chemotherapy is considered standard first-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but few later-line treatments are available. Here we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of the recombinant, humanized anti-EGFR antibody HLX07 when used alone or together with serplulimab and chemotherapy against advanced ESCC. This open-label, non-randomized, two-cohort, phase 2 trial involved patients 18-75 years old with histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic ESCC, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Patients who had failed first-line immuno-chemotherapy or at least two lines of other systemic therapy received HLX07 monotherapy intravenously at a dose of 1,000 mg once every 2 weeks (Q2W). Patients with no prior systemic therapy received HLX07 (1,000 mg, day 1) and serplulimab (200 mg, day 1) intravenously Q2W for up to 2 years, concurrently with cisplatin (50 mg/m2, day 1) for up to 8 cycles and 5-fluorouracil (1,200 mg/m2, days 1-2) for up to 12 cycles intravenously Q2W. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Overall, 50 patients were enrolled. In the HLX07 monotherapy group, ORR was 15.0% (3/20), and the median PFS was 1.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 3.7). The median duration of response was not reached, and the rate of patients showing an objective response lasting at least 6 months was 66.7% (95% CI, 5.4 to 94.5). Two (10.0%, 2/20) patients experienced grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), including hypomagnesemia, hypocalcemia, and fatigue. No patient experienced grade 5 TRAEs. In the HLX07 combination group, the ORR was 60.0% (18/30), and the median PFS was 7.8 months (95% CI, 3.3 to 9.1). Fourteen (46.7%, 14/30) patients experienced grade 3-4 TRAEs, and one (3.3%, 1/30) patient died due to serplulimab-related pneumonitis. HLX07 monotherapy and its combination with serplulimab and chemotherapy showed manageable toxicity and promising antitumor activity in patients with recurrent or metastatic ESCC. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to further establish the safety and efficacy of HLX07 against ESCC. This trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05221658).

Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of zanubrutinib (MAGNOLIA, BGB-3111-AU-003) versus ibrutinib (PCYC-1121) and rituximab (CHRONOS-3) in relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma.

In the absence of head-to-head randomized trials, unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were conducted to estimate the relative efficacy of zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib and zanubrutinib versus rituximab in relapsed or refractory marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Logistic propensity score models were used to estimate weights for the patient-level data from two phase II single-arm trials, MAGNOLIA and BGB-3111-AU-003, such that their characteristics matched the ibrutinib and rituximab aggregate-level data from PCYC-1121 and CHRONOS-3, respectively. The base case model for each comparison incorporated four key prognostic factors: prior lines of therapy, MZL subtype, response to prior therapy, and age. A sensitivity analysis incorporating additional prognostic factors was also conducted for the ibrutinib comparison. The impact of each covariate was explored via a leave-one-out analysis. Compared with ibrutinib and rituximab, zanubrutinib demonstrated significant benefits in terms of both overall response and progression-free survival in patients with previously treated MZL.