Primary Surgery Research Articles

Correlation of the treatment sensitivity of patient-derived organoids with treatment outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer (SOTO): protocol for a prospective observational study

IntroductionOrganoids have been successfully used in several areas of cancer research and large living biobanks of patient-derived organoids (PDOs) have been developed from various malignancies. The characteristics of the original...

Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing reoperation with solitary fibrous tumors/hemangiopericytomas and malignant progression of tumors.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical outcomes and malignant progression of tumors in patients who underwent reoperation for recurrent solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) and hemangiopericytomas (HPCs). We identified 48 patients who underwent reoperation because of tumor recurrence at Tangdu Hospital between January 2010 and December 2021 and analyzed the clinical outcomes, namely, the rate of gross total resection (GTR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), malignant progression of tumors and radiotherapy. The survival curves for each group were plotted using the Kaplan‒Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. Of the 48 patients (25 men and 23 women, mean age 49.5 ± 14.3 years), 25 experienced a second recurrence or metastasis, 15 of whom underwent a third surgery, and the remaining 10 patients who did not undergo surgery ultimately died after tumor progression. The median time (95% CI) to tumor recurrence was 40.0 (32.3-47.7) months after reoperation, with 3-, 5- and 10-year PFS rates of 54.6%, 29.5% and 14.8%, respectively. The median (95% CI) survival time was 70.0 (46.6-93.4) months, with 3-, 5- and 10-year survival rates of 67.9%, 55.1% and 36.7%, respectively. Among the 48 patients who underwent reoperation, 27 (56.3%) achieved GTR, and 21 (43.8%) achieved STR. Twelve patients in the GTR group (12/27, 44.4%) received radiotherapy after surgery, and 18 patients in the STR group (18/21, 85.7%) received radiotherapy. Of the 48 recurrent SFTs, 24 were classified as WHO grade 1, 14 were classified as WHO grade 2, and 10 were classified as WHO grade 3 based on 2021 WHO classification after the primary operation. After reoperation, 9 tumors developed malignant progression, including 4 WHO grade 1 tumors progressing to WHO grade 2 tumors, 1 WHO grade 1 tumor progressing to a WHO grade 3 tumor and 4 WHO grade 2 tumors progressing to WHO grade 3 tumors. GTR after reoperation was associated with better PFS and OS compared to STR. However, the PFS after the third surgery was significantly shorter than that after the second surgery, and the rate of GTR also decreased. Malignant progression may occur after second or third tumor recurrence. Furthermore, compared with WHO grade 1 SFTs, WHO grade 2 and grade 3 SFTs significantly decreased PFS, but OS did not differ among the three groups. Radiotherapy did not prolong PFS or OS in patients who underwent reoperation.

Examining Disparities in Regional Anesthesia Utilization, Opioid Prescriptions, and Pain Scores Among Patients Who Received Primary or Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most performed surgical operations in the United States. Managing postoperative pain after TKA is of vital importance, as it is positively associated with outcome measures related to recovery of function and quality of life. Two commonly used methods to control postoperative pain are regional anesthesia (RA), consisting of a single or a combination of peripheral nerve and epidural blocks, and pain medication, such as opioids. Our retrospective analysis sought to better understand whether revision versus primary TKA impacted previously discovered disparities in perioperative pain management and use of RA at the Atlanta Veterans Affairs Health Care System (AVAHCS). Before data collection, we hypothesized that revision TKA would have a higher proportion of Black and older patients and that revision TKA patients would have lower postoperative pain scores. This was a retrospective analysis of AVAHCS patients who underwent elective unilateral primary or revision TKA surgery between 2014 and 2020. After application of our exclusion criteria, data from 562 patients were analyzed. Data collected included demographics information, type of RA used, and pain scores. Statistical analyses included chi-square test, t-tests, multiple logistic regression, and multiple linear regression, as appropriate to the outcomes of interest. Revision TKA patients were more likely to be Black (P = .018) and younger (P = .023 for <50 years of age group, P = .006 for 50 to 64 years of age compared to the >65 years group). Black patients, compared to White patients, had significantly higher pain scores at baseline (P = .0086) and at 24 hours postsurgery (P = .0037). Older patients (≥50 years old) had significantly higher baseline pain scores (P = .021 for the 50 to 64 years group, P < .01 for the >65 years group) and significantly lower first postanesthesia care unit pain scores (P < .05). Black race (P < .01) and age > 65 years (P < .01) were associated with a significant decrease in total oral morphine equivalents (OME) prescribed at discharge. None of the predictor variables-race, age, type of surgery (primary versus revision), baseline, and first postanesthesia care unit pain scores-were significantly associated with the use of RA in our cohort. Sociodemographic disparities in pain management have been reported in all healthcare systems, including the VAHCS. This moderately sized retrospective study, conducted at a single veterans affairs site, yielded several noteworthy findings. One finding of particular interest was that, despite Black patients reporting higher baseline and 24-hour postoperative pain scores, they were prescribed fewer opioids at discharge. Our results highlight the presence of clinically significant disparities in perioperative TKA pain management, emphasizing the need for continuous investigation and focused mitigation efforts among Veterans.

ACTH stimulation and oral salt loading tests detect biochemical outcome early after primary aldosteronism surgery.

In primary aldosteronism (PA), the biochemical outcomes of the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome study are used to assess aldosterone hypersecretion 6-12 months after surgery. However, few studies have investigated whether the outcomes can be predicted in the early postoperative period. In this retrospective study, we evaluated whether the adrenocorticotropin stimulation test (AST) and oral salt loading test (OST) performed immediately after surgery could predict biochemical outcomes 1 year after surgery. We assessed 268 patients with PA who underwent adrenalectomy at our hospital between 2008 and 2020, underwent AST and OST within 15 days of surgery, and were assessed for biochemical outcomes 1 year after surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: biochemical complete success (B-com; n = 219) and incomplete success (B-inc; n = 49). Patients were divided into clinical complete and partial success and absent success groups. The relationships between various AST and OST values and outcomes were analyzed. The B-inc group had significantly higher plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and PAC/serum cortisol ratio (PAC/Cort) at baseline and after ACTH loading in AST and 24-hour urine aldosterone in OST than the B-com group. PAC/Cort at 30 min after ACTH loading (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.76) and 24-hour urine aldosterone (AUC = 0.77) were relatively superior predictors of the outcome. Parameters after ACTH loading were better predictors of biochemical and clinical outcomes than baseline. AST and OST immediately after surgery can predict biochemical and clinical outcomes 1 year after surgery in patients with PA.

Proficiency in bariatric surgery may shorten the learning curve for minimally-invasive D2 gastrectomy.

Evidence from Asian studies suggests that minimally-invasive gastrectomy achieves equivalent oncological but improved perioperative outcomes compared to open surgery. Oncological gastric resections are less frequent in European countries. Index procedures may play a role for the learning curve of minimally-invasive gastrectomy. The aim of our study was to evaluate if skills acquired in bariatric surgery allow a safe and oncologically adequate implementation of minimally-invasive gastrectomy in a cohort of european patients. In this single-center retrospective study, all patients who received primary bariatric surgery between January 2015 and December 2018 and minimally-invasive surgery for gastric cancer treated from June 2019 to January 2023 were evaluated. Primary endpoints were operation time, lymph node yield and lymph node fractions. Secondary endpoints included postoperative complications and oncological outcomes. Learning curves for two surgeons with 350 bariatric procedures and 44 minimally-invasive gastrectomies were analyzed. For bariatric surgery, the mean operation time decreased from initially 82 ± 27 to 45 ± 21min and 118 ± 28 to 81 ± 36min for sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), while the complication rate remained within the international benchmark. For laparoscopic gastrectomy (n = 30), operation times decreased but then remained stable over time. Operation times for the robotic platform were longer (302 ± 60 vs. 390 ± 48min; p < 0.001) with the learning curve remaining incomplete after 14 procedures. R0 status was achieved in 95.5% of patients; the mean number of lymph nodes retrieved was 37 ± 14 with no differences between the groups. Complete mesogastric excision was more frequently achieved during the later laparoscopic cases whereas it occurred earlier for the robotic group (p = 0.004). Perioperative morbidity was comparable to the European benchmark. Textbook outcome was achieved in 54.4% of the cases. In summary, we could demonstrate a successful skill transfer from bariatric surgery to minimally-invasive laparoscopic oncological gastric surgery enabling safe and oncologically adequate minimally-invasive D2 gastrectomy in a central European patient collective.

Multimodal prehabilitation improves functional capacity in patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery

ObjectivePrehabilitation, defined as the preparatory intervention to increase patient preparedness in the lead-up to surgery, has shown a decrease in post-operative complications in various types of surgery. However, there is...

Clinical outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients with obesity and idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Obesity is a major risk factor for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Effective therapeutics for preventing disease progression and alleviating symptoms are limited. This study aims to examine the effects of bariatric surgery on clinical outcomes of IIH. We retrospectively collected data from the medical record of 97 patients with obesity and an existing diagnosis of IIH who underwent primary bariatric surgery at the Cleveland Clinic health system in the USA between 2005 and 2023. Pre- and postoperative data on presence of symptoms and clinical markers of IIH (headaches, visual field defects, papilledema, visual symptoms), intracranial pressure, andusage of IIH medications were compared. A total of 97 patients (98% female, median age 46.7years, median BMI 48.3kg/m2) with IIH who underwent bariatric surgery including Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 66, 68%), sleeve gastrectomy (n = 27, 27.8%), and gastric banding (n = 4, 4.1%) were analyzed. In a median follow-up time of 3.0years, the median total weight loss was 24% (interquartile range, 13-33%). There was a significant improvement in headache, papilledema, visual field deficits, and visual symptoms after bariatric surgery. The mean lumbar opening pressure before and after bariatric surgery was 34.8 ± 8.2cm CSF and 24.2 ± 7.6cm CSF, respectively, with a mean reduction of 10.7 cm CSF (95% confidence interval, 4.7 to 16.6), p = 0.003. The dosage of acetazolamide and topiramate, as well as the number of medications taken for IIH, decreased significantly after bariatric surgery (p < 0.001). For patients who have obesity, bariatric surgery is a viable treatment modality for alleviation or improvement of symptoms of IIH.

Textbook oncologic outcome is an easy-to-use composite quality measure that is strongly associated with survival in advanced-stage ovarian cancer

ObjectiveTextbook oncologic outcome (TOO) has been validated in surgical oncology as a composite quality measure correlated with oncologic outcomes. We aimed to assess the association between TOO and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing primary treatment for advanced epithelial tubo-ovarian cancer (AEOC). MethodsPatients undergoing surgery for AEOC between 2008 and 2019 were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) cohorts were analyzed separately. TOO was defined as achieving complete debulking, length of hospital stay <10 days, no 30-day readmission, no death within 90 days, and initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy within 42 days. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 5-year OS by TOO status and Cox regression to evaluate the relationship between TOO and death within 5 years. ResultsA total of 21,657 patients were included: 51.4% in the PDS cohort and 48.6% in the IDS cohort. TOO was achieved (TOO+) in 20.5% of the PDS cohort and 39.2% of the IDS cohort. For the PDS cohort, achieving TOO was associated with improved 5-year OS: 59.0% TOO+ vs. 39.5% TOO- (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.49–0.57). For the IDS cohort, a similar benefit was seen for 5-year OS: 43.9% TOO+ vs. 31.2% TOO- (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.63–0.70). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that patients achieving TOO were at lower risk of death within 5 years in both the PDS cohort (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.54–0.62) and the IDS cohort (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.65–0.73). ConclusionsThe TOO composite measure is associated with improved long-term survival and could be a useful quality assessment tool for patients undergoing primary treatment for AEOC, irrespective of surgical timing. This tool reflects the ability to deliver risk-based individualized decision-making using a multidisciplinary approach.

Circulating methylated HOXA9 tumor DNA as a biomarker for mortality in recurrent breast cancer: An exploratory study.

Methylated homeobox A9 (meth-HOXA9) circulating tumor DNA may be a relevant biomarker in breast cancer, although its clinical significance remains unknown. The present exploratory study aimed to investigate the association between meth-HOXA9 and mortality in patients with recurrent breast cancer. The cohort study enrolled 51 patients with breast cancer recurrence from the Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark (Vejle, Denmark). Tissue samples from primary surgery and biopsies, and plasma samples obtained at the time of recurrence were analyzed for meth-HOXA9 using a methylation-specific droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Using Cox regression, hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing patients with detectable and undetectable meth-HOXA9 in both tumor tissue and plasma were estimated. Among the 50 patients with data on tumor tissue meth-HOXA9, there was no association between meth-HOXA9 in the primary tumor and mortality (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.47-2.52). A total of 34 patients had data on plasma meth-HOXA9 at the time of recurrence. Detectable plasma meth-HOXA9 was associated with higher mortality (HR 3.95, 95% CI 1.50-10.37). Among the 20 patients with data on both plasma and metastatic tissue meth-HOXA9, meth-HOXA9 was detectable in 90% of metastases and 65% of plasma samples. In conclusion, detectable plasma meth-HOXA9 was significantly associated with higher mortality in recurrent breast cancer; therefore, plasma meth-HOXA9 may prove useful as a prognostic marker in patients with breast cancer.

Impact of pre-existing mesh at the hiatus at revisional hiatal hernia surgery.

Recurrence after laparoscopic hiatus hernia repair (LHR) is high, with few symptomatic patients undergoing redo LHR. Morbidity is higher in redo surgery compared with the primary operation. Tens of studies have explored the safety of redoing LHR. However, the impact of existing mesh on operative risk is rarely examined. We aim to assess the impact of mesh at the hiatus on the safety of redo LHR. This was a cohort study examining redo LHR patients from a prospectively maintained database from January 2002 to December 2023. The primary outcome was intra-/postoperative complications. Follow-up was extracted from clinical records. Predictors of complications were assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Redo LHR was performed in 100 patients; 22 had previous mesh. One encountered mortality with 23 complications. Five patients had absorbable mesh, with the remainder nonabsorbable. Overall complications were significantly higher with mesh at nine (40.9%) compared to no mesh redo at 14 (17.9%), P = 0.023. There was no difference in rates of visceral injury with mesh at four (18.2%) and no mesh at six (7.7%), P = 0.22. The median follow-up was 7months; there was no difference in reflux rates (P = 0.70) but higher rates of dysphagia (P = 0.010). Higher overall complications were noted in patients with previous hiatal mesh repair at the time of LHR. However, major visceral complications were similar regardless of mesh use. Mesh at the hiatus should not be a deterrent for reoperative hiatus surgery.

Revision of Press-Fit Bone-Anchored Prosthesis After Implant Failure.

The present video article describes the revision of a bone-anchored prosthesis in patients who received an osseointegration implant after transfemoral amputation. Clinical follow-up studies have shown that approximately 5% of all patients who receive press-fit cobalt-chromium alloy femoral implants experience failure of the intramedullary stem component as a result of septic loosening or stem breakage. For stem breakage, stem diameter and the occurrence of infectious events were identified as risk factors. We began regularly utilizing the standard German press-fit endo-exo cast cobalt-chrome implant in 2009, but changed to the forged titanium version in 2014 (BADAL X, OTN Implants) because of the breakages associated with the former implant. No breakages have been reported since making the switch, and as such we currently still utilize the titanium implant. Current Commission Européenne-certified bone-anchored implants for transfemoral amputation include a screw-type stem and a press-fit stem. The revision technique demonstrated in the present article may apply to both types of implant system, but this video is limited to demonstrating the use of a press-fit implant. We describe the 3 stages of debridement, removal, and subsequent implantation of a bone-anchored prosthesis in a revision setting. We perform this procedure in up to 3 stages, with 10 to 12 weeks between removal of the failed implant and implantation of the revision prosthesis. For stage 1, in case of mechanical failure, the broken remnants of the implant, which may dangle in the soft tissues, are removed. The stoma is debrided, after which spontaneous stoma healing is achieved. In cases of septic loosening, stage 1 includes removal of the implant by retrograde hammering, followed by multiple debridements with flexible reamers and jet lavage until negative cultures are obtained. In stage 2, the broken osseointegration implant is removed with use of a custom-made titanium water-cooled hollow drill. With the use of this drill, we have always been successful in removing the broken implant while maintaining sufficient bone stock for future implant revision. If the corer fails, a larger approach is needed to remove the implant. The corer drill should have a wall that is as thin but as robust as possible in order to avoid cortical perforation, and should be manufactured from a strong material in order to resist the usage against the implant. We utilized a steel corer when initially performing this procedure, which was frequently unsuccessful, necessitating a larger approach to remove the implant. We currently utilize a 3D-printed corer drill with integrated water-cooling system with greater success (Xilloc Medical). This corer is custom-made and needs about 6 weeks for designing and manufacturing. This tool is utilized in the present video article. Stage 3 includes revision implantation of an osseointegration prosthesis, utilizing similar templating as in the primary surgical procedure. The time needed for the bone to recover from explantation is arbitrary, but we allow around 2 to 3 months before implanting a new intramedullary component. In cases of poor bone stock, a bone impaction graft can be applied prior to insertion of revision implant. A return to the prior mobilization level is an alternative to revision of the failed implant. Failure due to stem breakage can occur in cases utilizing small-diameter cobalt-chromium implants. Such cases can be revised with use of large-diameter titanium implants, provided there is sufficient bone stock. Failure due to septic loosening may occur in patients who are not properly indicated for this procedure, such as those with severe dysvascular disease or diabetes mellitus. A revised implant is also at increased risk for recurrent failure. Revision of bone-anchored prostheses includes up to 3 stages depending on whether the revision is for septic loosening or stem breakage. Although we allow 10 to 12 weeks before implanting a new intramedullary component, the time needed for the bone to recover from the explantation is arbitrary. During this interval, a temporary socket can be manufactured to allow mobilization with use of an artificial limb; however, most patients use just crutches and/or a wheelchair during this interval. Be aware of the type of implant that needs to be removed.Prepare for long operative times, especially in cases in which implants need to be cut or when dense cortical bone is expected.Account for 1.5 to 2 mm of extra diameter of the coring drill on either side in order to allow for the curvature of the press-fit implant.Plan for and acquire the right tools. Make sure to have at least 2 corer drills present in case of damage or malfunction.Utilize a fluoroscope frequently during initial drilling around the stem remnant.In case of poor bone stock, prepare for future bone impaction grafting when planning for revision implantation of a bone-anchored prosthesis. OI = osseointegration implantBAP = bone-anchored prosthesisBIG = bone impaction grafting.

Laparoscopic prediction of primary cytoreducibility of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Ovarian cancer affects thousands of women every year and represents the female cancer with the highest mortality rate. Effectively, it is a severe disease that requires a multidisciplinary approach for optimal treatment. Surgery currently is the cornerstone of its treatment and numerous methods have been analyzed and developed to predict the possibility of obtaining a residual tumor of 0 (RT=0). This review aimed to analyze the available data in the literature about minimally invasive surgical methods to predict an RT=0 in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma undergoing primary debulking surgery. An accurate review of the literature has been performed on the available data about the surgical criteria of cytoreducibility during primary debulking surgery. An accurate assessment of the extent of intra- and extra-abdominal pathology is essential to guide the surgeon in the most appropriate therapeutic choice for patients with ovarian cancer and multidisciplinary approaches that combine different methodologies such as radiological methods (magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography and computed tomography), surgical (mini-laparotomy, laparoscopy) and serological (CA-125, HE4) data provide a complete picture in determining the extent of the tumor and an enormous aid in personalizing the therapeutic approach.

Nasal Light Reflex: A Useful Intraoperative Tool in Correction of Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity.

The correction of a unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity remains a challenge to cleft surgeons. It is difficult to obtain a routinely predictable outcome. This is in part due to there being no objective intraoperative method to assess the correction. We have come up with a simple objective intraoperative method to plan and assess the correction of the nasal deformity. This is done by assessing the nasal light reflex using a mobile phone camera to define the deformity. The points of the desired correction of the lower lateral cartilage are transposed onto the patient. Once the lip and nose repair is completed, another photograph is taken to assess the nasal light reflex and assess the extent of correction. If this is inadequate, further nasal correction is performed. We have used this procedure in 122 cleft lip patients with 93 complete and 29 incomplete. We have found this to be a useful objective intraoperative method to assist in obtaining improved nasal correction in cleft lip patients. As is well known, relapse of the nose is common in cleft lip repairs, but this method allows one to better gauge the correction at the primary surgery. Nasal light reflex should be added to the armamentarium of cleft surgeons to assist in superior correction of the nose, which is an item that continues to vex these surgeons.

Eco-logistical comparison of non-radioactive seeds and the wire-guided localization for intraoperative detection of breast lesions

BackgroundThe current standard for the preoperative marking of non-palpable breast lesions is wire guided localization (WGL) which is associated with logistical efforts and patient discomfort. Non-radioactive seeds (NRS) recently challenged the use of WGL; but do they provide a better alternative from a logistical and environmental perspective? MethodsWGL standard was compared with NRS available in Germany: Magseed®, Pintuition®, SAVI SCOUT ® and LOCalizer™ on a logistical and carbon-footprinting basis. In the logistical analysis the number of patient contacts with the healthcare system for lesion localization/removal and the number of breast punctures were evaluated in two different clinical scenarios (primary surgery and secondary surgery after neoadjuvant treatment). The carbon footprints of WGL and NRS (with exception of LOCalizer) were assessed based on their material compositions and operating energy in a streamlined approach. ResultsApplication of NRS reduces the number of contacts by 33.3 % (2 vs. 3) in primary, by 50 % (2 vs. 4) in secondary surgery, and the number of breast punctures by 33.3 % (2 vs.3). Annual Germany-wide material- and energy-based carbon footprints of NRS (1.6 to 3.2 tons CO2eq) are significantly lower in comparison to WGL (10.3 tons CO2eq). The implementation of NRS would lead to a CO2eq reduction by around 79 % compared to WGL. ConclusionsThe use of NRS for the localization of non palpable breast lesions is more favorable from the environmental and logistical perspective, when compared to WGL with possible benefits for patients, healthcare providers and the environment.

What to expect following targeted muscle reinnervation/regenerative peripheral nerve interface: Pain outcomes in an amputee population

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) and Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) have shown promise in improving and/or preventing neuropathic pain and reducing narcotic use in amputees. However, anecdotally, some patients experience an increase in pain in the first few months post-operatively. This study explored the pain trajectory of 22 upper and lower extremity amputees following their TMR and/or RPNI procedure in their first post-operative year, with a focus on the patterns of recovery the first few months. Our study found an overall decrease in the amount of pain and pain medication use at various time points post-operatively. Of note, several individuals had an increase in pain or required an increase in pain medications in the first three months. Different outcomes for patients who underwent primary versus secondary surgery were seen, which has been observed in other studies. Further prospective studies are warranted to evaluate these trends in pain after TMR or RPNI surgery in individuals with major limb amputations.

Remission of hypertension after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass: a systematic review of randomized control trials

BackgroundBesides its benefits for weight loss, current findings suggest that bariatric surgery can induce remission of hypertension. Limited data report the effect of bariatric surgery on this obesity-associated comorbidity. ObjectiveCompare the short-term, mid-term, and long-term remission of hypertension after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass MethodsFour databases (Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on hypertension remission at <1 year, 2–4 years, and ≥5 years. Patients with a history of hypertension and who had primary bariatric surgery were included. ResultsAfter reviewing 11,814 studies, only 11 RCTs were included. In total, the analysis included 2323 patients, with 1158 in the SG group (49.85%) and 1165 in the RYGB group (50.15%). It was found that SG and RYGB procedures had comparable hypertension remission at ≤1 year (Relative risk: 1.11, 95% CI .83–1.48, P = .49), and between 2 and 4 years (Relative risk: 1.11, 95% CI .90–1.37, P = .34). However, there was a significant difference in hypertension remission at ≥ 5 years, favoring RYGB (relative risk: 1.39, 95% CI 1.06–1.82, P = .02). ConclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs demonstrates that RYGB is superior to SG in resolving hypertension beyond 5 years postoperatively. These findings highlight the long-term benefits of RYGB over SG in managing hypertension, providing valuable insights for surgical decision-making and patient counseling.

Permanent pacemaker implantation after combined mitral- and tricuspid valve surgery: a nationwide multicentre study.

The threshold to perform concomitant tricuspid valve (TV) repair during primary mitral valve (MV) surgery has decreased, based on recent randomized evidence. Based on these developments, the indication for TV repair during MV surgery is expected to increase further. However, concerns have been raised regarding the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) during a concomitant procedure. Therefore, we aim to assess the incidence of PPI in combined MV and TV surgery in a nationwide registry. The current study uniquely cross-linked the Cardiothoracic and Pacemaker/ICD registry of the Netherlands Heart Registration. Patients undergoing primary MV and TV surgery (± atrial septal defect closure, rhythm surgery, coronary artery bypass grafting) between 1 January and 31 December2021 were included. The primary outcome was PPI within 30 days after surgery. Subgroup analyses were performed for isolated MV and TV surgery and MV repair. The association between concomitant TV surgery and PPI was assessed using multivariable binary logistic regression analyses. A total of 1060 patients (n = 833 MV, n = 227 MV + TV) were included. The overall incidence of PPI was 4.3%. No significant difference in PPI between MV and MV + TV surgery were found (3.7% vs 6.6%, P = 0.06). Concomitant TV surgery was not an independent risk factor for PPI after surgery after adjustment for covariates. These results were robust after sensitivity analyses. The current study was not able to find a statistical difference between the PPI rate in MV surgery patients and MV + TV surgery patients. Extension of the waiting period prior to PPI, may result in decreased PPI rates.

Venous Thromboembolic Events Following Revisional Gastric Bypass: An Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database from 2015 to 2019 Using Propensity Matching.

Primary bariatric surgery is associated with moderate-to-high risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTE); however, the risk for revisional surgery lacks granularity. Our primary objective was to define the risk of VTE following revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) compared to primary RYGB. Adults who underwent primary or revision/conversion RYGB between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, with a BMI ≥ 35kg/m2 were identified in a bariatric specific database. VTE was defined as pulmonary embolus and/or deep venous thrombosis. Thirty-day VTE and transfusion rates were compared between the two groups using propensity score matching of 3:1. Primary RYGB was performed in 197,186 (92.4%) patients compared to 16,144 (7.6%) in the revisional group. Patients in the revisional group had fewer comorbidities than those undergoing primary RYGB. In the matched cohort of 64,258 procedures, there were 48,116 (74.9%) primary RYGB cases compared to 16,142 (25.1%) RYGB revisions. The rate of VTE was similar in the revisional surgery group compared to the propensity matched primary RYGB group (0.4% vs. 0.3%, p > 0.580); however, transfusion was more common in the revisional group (1.4% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.005). Revisional group had higher rates of readmission, reoperation, increased length of stay, and operation length ≥ 180min compared to matched primary RYGB group (p < 0.001). VTE rates for both primary and revisional RYGB are similar. Revisional RYGB cases impose increased risk of bleeding among other outcomes. Thus, identifying those at higher risk of complications is critical.

TCT-292 Prognostic Value of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Primary Valve Surgery Combined With Coronary Artery Disease

TCT-292 Prognostic Value of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Primary Valve Surgery Combined With Coronary Artery Disease

Trends and Factors Influencing Surgical Choices for Femoral Neck Fractures

Introduction: Femoral neck fractures pose significant health risks, particularly in the elderly population, leading to mortality, morbidity, and decreased quality of life. Surgery is the preferred treatment to restore function and alleviate pain, with options including total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA). However, clinical guidelines for selecting surgical procedures remain heterogeneous, prompting the need for further investigation into treatment trends and influencing factors. Methods: Data from the NIS database spanning 2016–2019 were analyzed, focusing on patients diagnosed with intracapsular femoral neck fractures and undergoing THA or HA as primary in-hospital surgeries. Advanced statistical analyses using SPSS and MATLAB were conducted to identify trends and factors influencing surgical choices. Results: Comorbidity profiles varied significantly between HA and THA patients, with specific conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease showing higher prevalence in HA patients. Demographic differences included a higher proportion of females and Medicare-insured individuals in the HA group. Racial disparities were observed, with differences in surgical preferences among various ethnic groups. THA adoption gradually increased over the study period, indicating a shift in surgical priorities. Additionally, THA patients tended to be younger on average compared with HA patients. Conclusions: This study highlights evolving trends in surgical management for femoral neck fractures and identifies factors influencing treatment decisions in our cohort. Understanding these trends and disparities is crucial for optimizing patient care and informing future clinical guidelines. Further research should focus on assessing different surgical approaches’ long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.