Primary Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Group Research Articles

Fibrinolysis or Primary PCI in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BackgroundIt is not known whether prehospital fibrinolysis, coupled with timely coronary angiography, provides a clinical outcome similar to that with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) early after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).MethodsAmong 1892 patients with STEMI who presented within 3 hours after symptom onset and who were unable to undergo primary PCI within 1 hour, patients were randomly assigned to undergo either primary PCI or fibrinolytic therapy with bolus tenecteplase (amended to half dose in patients ≥75 years of age), clopidogrel, and enoxaparin before transport to a PCI-capable hospital. Emergency coronary angiography was performed if fibrinolysis failed; otherwise, angiography was performed 6 to 24 hours after randomization. The primary end point was a composite of death, shock, congestive heart failure, or reinfarction up to 30 days.ResultsThe primary end point occurred in 116 of 939 patients (12.4%) in the fibrinolysis group and in 135 of 943 patients (14.3%) in the primary PCI group (relative risk in the fibrinolysis group, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.09; P=0.21). Emergency angiography was required in 36.3% of patients in the fibrinolysis group, whereas the remainder of patients underwent angiography at a median of 17 hours after randomization. More intracranial hemorrhages occurred in the fibrinolysis group than in the primary PCI group (1.0% vs. 0.2%, P=0.04; after protocol amendment, 0.5% vs. 0.3%, P=0.45). The rates of nonintracranial bleeding were similar in the two groups.ConclusionsPrehospital fibrinolysis with timely coronary angiography resulted in effective reperfusion in patients with early STEMI who could not undergo primary PCI within 1 hour after the first medical contact. However, fibrinolysis was associated with a slightly increased risk of intracranial bleeding. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00623623.)

THROMBOLYSIS OR PRIMARY PCI FOR MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION WITH ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION? THE STREAM TRIAL (STRATEGIC REPERFUSION EARLY AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION)

Ambiguous data about comparability regarding clinical outcomes for prehospital thrombolysis, coupled with timely coronary angiography, and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the early after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), there are now. In the STREAM trial 1892 patients with STEMI diagnosed within 3 hours after onset of symptoms, and whom it was impossible to perform primary PCI within 1 h after the first medical contact, were randomly assigned into two treatment groups: a) primary PCI b) prehospital thrombolytic therapy with bolus tenecteplase (dose decreased by half in patients aged ≥75 years) in combination with clopidogrel and enoxaparin followed by admission to the hospital, where it was possible to perform PCI. Emergency coronary angiography performed if thrombolysis failed. Coronary angiography and PCI of the infarct-related artery were performed in the period from 6 to 24 hours after randomization and thrombolytic therapy in the case of an effective thrombolysis. Primary endpoints include a composite of death, shock, congestive heart failure, or reinfarction up to 30 days. The primary endpoint occurred in 116 of 939 patients (12.4 %) of the thrombolysis group and in 135 of 943 patients (14.3%) of the primary PCI group (relative risk in the group thrombolysis 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.68-1.09, p=0.21). Emergency angiography was required in 36.3% of patients in the thrombolysis, and the remaining patients, coronary angiography and PCI were performed at a mean of 17 hours after randomization and thrombolytic therapy. Thrombolysis group had more intracranial hemorrhages than primary PCI group (1.0% vs 0.2%, p=0.04; after correction protocol and dose reduction by half of tenecteplase in patients ≥75 years: 0.5% vs. 0.3%, p=0.45). The rate of non- intracranial bleeding in two treatment groups did not differ. Prehospital thrombolysis followed by coronary angiography and timely PCI provide effective reperfusion in patients in the early stages of STEMI that was not possible to carry out primary PCI within 1 h after the first medical contact. Nevertheless, fibrinolysis was associated with a slight increase in the risk of intracranial bleeding.

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT REPERFUSION STRATEGY ON BRAIN NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE LEVELS AND PROGNOSIS OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

ObjectivesTo investigate the effect of different reperfusion strategy on brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels and prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Methods102 patients with AMI were divided into four...

Impact of TIMI 3 patency before primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction on clinical outcome: results from the ASSENT-4 PCI study

Early restoration of blood flow of the infarct-related artery is associated with an improved outcome in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Previous studies have shown a low mortality in patients with TIMI 3 flow before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Most likely these patients had spontaneous recanalization of the infarct vessel and might constitute a low-risk subgroup. The purpose of the present analysis was to investigate whether TIMI 3 flow obtained with fibrinolysis before PCI is associated with a clinical outcome comparable to that in patients with spontaneous TIMI 3 flow. Patients with STEMI <6 hours enrolled in the ASSENT-4 PCI study were randomized to facilitated PCI with tenecteplase or primary PCI. For this analysis, patients were divided into three groups according to the TIMI flow of the infarct vessel before PCI: TIMI 0/1, TIMI 2, and TIMI 3. From a total of 1617 patients, 861 had TIMI 0/1, 279 had TIMI 2, and 477 TIMI 3 flow. The rates of TIMI 3 flow after PCI were 84.6, 89.7, and 95.6%, respectively. Complete ST resolution was observed most often in the TIMI 3 flow group (47.5, 53.6, and 58.6%). The incidence of cardiogenic shock (6.2, 5.5, and 3.6%) and 90-day mortality (6.1, 4.7, and 4.0%) were lowest in the group with TIMI 3 patency before PCI, respectively. The rate of TIMI 3 flow before PCI was higher in the facilitated PCI group than in the primary PCI group (43.9 vs. 15.2%). The 90-day mortality in patients with TIMI 3 before PCI was identical in the facilitated and the primary PCI groups (14/353, 4.0% vs. 5/124, 4.0%). In this post-hoc analysis of ASSENT-4 PCI, TIMI grade 3 flow in the infarct-related artery before PCI, occurring either spontaneously or obtained by fibrinolysis, is associated with a higher TIMI patency after PCI, better improved ST resolution and a trend towards a favourable clinical outcome after 90 days.

Reperfusion Strategies and Outcomes of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients in Canada: Observations From the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) and the Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events (CANRACE)

Background We examine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients receiving various reperfusion therapies in 2 contemporary Canadian registries. Methods Of 4045 STEMI patients, 2024 received reperfusion therapy and had complete data on invasive management. They were stratified by reperfusion strategy used: primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n =716); fibrinolysis with rescue PCI (n =177); fibrinolysis with urgent/elective PCI (n =210); and fibrinolysis without PCI (n =921). Data were collected on clinical and laboratory findings, and outcomes. Results Compared with fibrinolytic-treated patients, patients treated with primary PCI were younger and had higher Killip class, had longer time to delivery of reperfusion therapy, and utilized more antiplatelet therapy but less heparin, β-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. In-hospital death occurred in 2.7% of patients treated with primary PCI, 1.7% fibrinolysis-rescue PCI, 1.0% fibrinolysis-urgent/elective PCI, and 4.8% fibrinolysis-alone ( P =0.009); the rates of death/reinfarction were 3.9%, 4.0%, 4.3%, and 7.1% ( P =0.032), respectively. The rate of shock was highest in the primary PCI group. Rates of heart failure or major bleeding were similar in the 4 groups. In multivariable analysis, no PCI during hospitalization was associated with death and reinfarction (adjusted odds ratio = 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.70; P =0.04). Conclusions Clinical features, time to reperfusion, and medication utilization differed with respect to the reperfusion strategy. While low rates of re-infarction/death were observed, these complications occurred more frequently in those who did not undergo PCI during index hospitalization.

E0485 Clinic study of domestic tirofiban on TIMI Flow during facilitated PCI

ObjectiveTo assess Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow of the nation-produced tirofiban in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI).Methods120 patients with STEMI during...

Upstream High‐Dose Tirofiban Does Not Reduce Myocardial Infarct Size in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pilot Study

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is more effective than fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but initial treatment delay to intervention is the main limitation of this strategy. Upstream use of high-dose tirofiban could reduce myocardial infarct size, using analysis of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI). Patients with STEMI within 12 hours after symptom onset were randomized to a facilitated PCI group (n = 19) or to a primary PCI group (n = 20). The primary endpoint was myocardial infarct size evaluated by the volume of delayed hyperenhancement on CE-MRI at 1 month after index procedure. The baseline clinical characteristics were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Although the incidence of pre-PCI thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 2 to 3 was significantly higher in the facilitated PCI group than in the primary PCI group (47.4% vs 15.0%, P = 0.03), the achievement of myocardial blush grade 2 to 3 or ST-segment resolution at 30 minutes after procedure was not significantly different between the facilitated PCI and the primary PCI group (36.8% vs 40%, P = 0.84 and 31.6% vs 20%, P = 0.41, respectively). Infarct size on CE-MRI was similar in the facilitated PCI group and the conventional primary PCI group (22.1% +/- 11.7% vs 25.2% +/- 13.2%, P = 0.44). At 6 months, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on echocardiography was 52.6% +/- 10.4% in the facilitated PCI group and 50.9% +/- 9.8% in the primary PCI group (P = 0.68). Despite the improvement of initial TIMI flow grade, the upstream use of high-dose tirofiban did not reduce myocardial infarct size measured by CE-MRI.

Comparison of Early Mortality of Paramedic-Diagnosed ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Immediate Transport to a Designated Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Center to That of Similar Patients Transported to the Nearest Hospital

Speed of reperfusion is critical in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We assessed the safety and feasibility of an integrated metropolitan approach in which advanced-care paramedics interpret the prehospital electrocardiogram and independently refer patients with STEMI to a designated center for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We developed and implemented a protocol in which paramedics trained in electrocardiographic interpretation bypassed the nearest emergency room and referred patients with suspected STEMI directly to a designated primary PCI center (paramedic-referred primary PCI). Outcomes of these patients were compared with those of a retrospective cohort of 225 consecutive patients with STEMI transported by ambulance to the nearest hospital emergency department. We treated 108 consecutive patients with STEMI using ambulance services according to the paramedic-referred primary PCI protocol. Primary PCI was performed in 93.5% versus 8.9% in the control group, and the median door-to-balloon time was 63 versus 125 minutes in the control group (p <0.0001 for 2 comparisons). Thrombolytic therapy was prescribed to 80.4% of the control group, with a median door-to-needle time of 41 minutes. In-hospital mortality was 1.9% in the paramedic-referred primary PCI group versus 8.9% in the control group (p = 0.017) and remained significantly lower after statistical adjustment for baseline risk. In conclusion, paramedic-referred primary PCI is a safe and feasible strategy for treating STEMI that is associated with rapid and effective reperfusion and very low in-hospital mortality.

Outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients aged over 75 years

The optimal reperfusion strategy in elderly patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, in-hospital and one-year clinical outcomes for patients > 75 years of age with STEMI receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), compared with those treated by conservative approach. One hundred and two patients > 75 years of age with STEMI presented < 12 hours were randomly allocated to primary PCI (n = 50) or conservative therapy only (n = 52). The baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcome and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization at one-year clinical follow-up were compared between the two groups. Age, gender distribution, risk factors for coronary artery disease, infarct site and clinical functional status were similar between the two groups, but the patients in primary PCI group received less low-molecular-weight heparin during hospitalization. Compared with conservative group, the patients in primary PCI group had significantly lower occurrence rate of re-infarction and death and shortened hospital stay. The composite endpoint for in-hospital survivals at 30-day follow-up was similar between the two groups, but one-year MACE rate was significantly lower in the primary PCI group (21.3% and 45.2%, P = 0.029). Left ventricular ejection fraction was not significantly changed in both groups during follow-up. Multivariate analysis revealed that primary PCI (OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.21 - 0.69, P = 0.03) improved MACE-free survival rate for STEMI patients aged > 75 years. Our results indicated that primary PCI was safe and effective in reducing in-hospital mortality and one-year MACE rate for elderly patients with STEMI.