Primary Patellar Dislocation Research Articles

Age Is a Key Factor Influencing the Choice of Treatment for Primary Patellar Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Primary patellar dislocation has a certain recurrence rate after either conservative or surgical treatment, and the optimal treatment for patients with primary patellar dislocation of different ages remains unclear. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of surgical and conservative treatments for primary patellar dislocation across different age groups. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist, we conducted a systematic search for randomized controlled trials. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials of primary patellar dislocation treated surgically or conservatively up to January 2023. Data searching, extraction, analysis, and quality assessment were carried out in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. A total of nine studies with 433 patients were included in our study. There was no statistically significant difference between the two treatment modalities in terms of Kujala score, pain score, patient satisfaction, reoperation, and Tegner score. The rate of re-dislocation after surgical treatment is lower than that after conservative treatment. Subgroup analysis based on mean age showed that when the age was >20 years, Kujala scores were higher after surgical treatment than after conservative treatment (p < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.41-21.30). When the age was ≤20 years, the difference in Kujala scores between the two treatment modalities was not statistically significant. When the age was >20 years, the recurrence rate of patellar dislocation was lower after surgical treatment than after conservative treatment (p = 0.009, 95% CI = 0.08-0.70). When the age was ≤20 years, the difference in the recurrence rate of patellar dislocation between the two treatment modalities was not statistically significant. When the age of patients with primary patellar dislocation is ≤20 years, both surgical and conservative treatments result in similar clinical outcomes. When the age is >20 years, better clinical outcomes can be achieved by opting for surgical treatment. Therefore, surgery may be a better option for patients with primary patellar dislocation whose age is >20 years.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Augmentation Repair for Primary Patellar Dislocation With Concomitant Chondral or Osteochondral Injury in Children and Adolescents: Outcomes at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Treatment of primary patellar dislocation (PPD) with chondral or osteochondral injury without patellar stabilization in the adolescent population may lead to unsatisfactory outcomes. Surgical treatment, with or without traditional medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, is a topic of interest. To compare postoperative outcomes and rates of patellar redislocation and return to the operating room (OR) in patients who sustained a PPD with chondral or osteochondral injury and were surgically treated with versus without suture tape augmentation repair of the MPFL. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Adolescents who sustained a PPD with chondral or osteochondral injury confirmed via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and who were treated by a single surgeon between January 2009 and November 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into those who underwent chondral or osteochondral treatment with suture tape augmentation repair of the MPFL (ST group; n = 20) and those who did not have suture tape augmentation or repair (no-ST group; n = 20; 11 patients within the no-ST group did undergo medial imbrication). Demographic characteristics, postoperative knee range of motion, pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements, and preoperative MRI parameters were recorded, and minimum 2-year patient-reported outcomes were collected. Data were compared between the ST and no-ST groups. The mean patient age was 15.02 years (range, 12.64-17.61 years) in the ST group and 14.18 years (range, 10.56-16.38 years) in the no-ST group, with a mean follow-up of 3.63 years (range, 2.01-6.11 years) in the ST group and 4.98 years (range, 2.23-9.03 years) in the no-ST group. Significantly more patients returned to the OR in the no-ST group compared with the ST group (7 [35%] vs 0 [0%]; P = .008). Further patellar stabilization with an MPFL allograft (n = 5) and manipulation under anesthesia (n = 2) were reasons for returning to the OR. There were no redislocation events in the ST group. Treating PPDs with chondral or osteochondral injury using suture tape to augment and repair the MPFL has promising advantages over not repairing it-including lower rates of postoperative patellar instability and return to the OR.

Patellar Dislocation: Workup and Decision-Making.

Acute patellar dislocation (PD) is usually a problem of adolescents and young adults. In most cases, it is a sports-related injury. It is the result of an indirect force on the knee joint, which leads to valgus and external rotation of the tibia relative to the femur. PD is unlikely to occur on a knee with normal patellofemoral joint (PFJ) anatomy. Acute PD consists of an acute injury of the ligamentous medial patellar stabilizers in the background of factors predisposing to patellar instability. These factors are classified into three groups. The first group refers to the integrity of the ligamentous medial patellar restraints, particularly, the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). The second group refers to an abnormal PFJ anatomy, which renders the patella inherently unstable inside the trochlea. The third group refers to the overall axial and torsional profile of the lower limb and to systemic factors, such as ligament laxity and neuromuscular coordination of movement. PD at a younger age is associated with an increased number and severity of patellar instability predisposing factors and lower stress to dislocate the patella. Acute primary PD is usually treated conservatively, while surgical treatment is reserved for recurrent PD. The aim of treatment is to restore the stability and function of the PFJ and to reduce the risk of patellar redislocation. Surgical procedures to treat patellar instability are classified into non-anatomic and anatomic procedures. Non-anatomic procedures are extensor mechanism realignment techniques that aim to center the patella into the trochlear groove. Anatomic procedures aim to restore the PFJ anatomy (ruptured ligaments, osteochondral fractures), which has been severed after the first incident of PD. Anatomic procedures, especially MPFL reconstruction, are more effective in preventing recurrent PD, compared with non-anatomic techniques. Theoretically, all factors that affect PFJ stability should be evaluated and, if possible, addressed. This is practically impossible. Considering that the MPFL ruptures in almost all PDs, MPFL reconstruction is the primary procedure, which is currently selected by most surgeons as a first-line treatment for patients with recurrent PD. Restoration of the axial and torsional alignment of the lower limbs is also increasingly implemented by surgeons. Non-anatomic surgical techniques, such as tibial-tuberosity osteotomy, are used as an adjunct to anatomic procedures. In the presence of multiple PFJ instability factors, acute MPFL reconstruction may be the treatment of choice for acute primary PD as well. Skeletal immaturity of the patient precludes osseous procedures to avoid premature physis closure and subsequent limb deformity. Unfortunately, restoration of the patient's previous activity level or participation in more strenuous sports is questionable and not easy to predict. In the case of competitive athletes, PD may prevent participation in elite levels of sports.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction appears to be a better treatment than repair, proximal realignment, or conservative management for primary patellar dislocation: A network meta-analysis.

The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes and re-dislocation rates of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, MPFL repair, combined proximal realignment (CPR), and conservative management for primary patellar dislocation by conducting a systematic literature search of the available studies. The hypothesis was that MPFL repair and MPFL reconstruction would be better options for treating primary patellar dislocation. Randomized controlled trials or prospective studies of primary patellar dislocation treated with MPFL reconstruction, MPFL repair, CPR, or conservative management were identified from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases through December 31, 2021. A total of 626 patients met the prespecified inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of each study was assessed using a risk of bias table, Detsky quality index, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The end-point data collected included comparisons of the mean in functional scores on knee outcomes scales and the number of patients who experienced re-dislocation. A network meta-analysis of the relevant literature was performed to investigate which treatment showed better outcomes. In total, 10 trials were included in this study. There was no statistically significant difference in the subgroup analysis in terms of the functional outcomes among MPFL reconstruction, MPFL repair, CPR, and conservative management. However, MPFL reconstruction showed statistically significantly better outcomes than MPFL repair, CPR, or conservative management in terms of the re-dislocation rate. Additionally, surface under the cumulative ranking curve percentage showed that MPFL reconstruction had a lower probability of re-dislocation than MPFL repair even though there was no significant difference (0.24, 95% confidence interval: 0.02-2.91). Using a network meta-analysis, this meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in functional outcomes in a subgroup analysis. In re-dislocation subgroup analysis, MPFL repair and MPFL reconstruction produced significantly better results than other treatments. Also, surface under the cumulative ranking curve percentage showed that MPFL reconstruction had a lower probability of re-dislocation than MPFL repair.

Potential of patellar height measurement methods in predicting recurrent patellar dislocation incidence: a case-control study

BackgroundRecurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) is a multifactorial disease that affects young and active people. Patellar height measurements are used clinically to screen and diagnose knee conditions. However, there are no known studies that have assessed and compared the performance of patellar height indices for predicting the incidence of RPD, which could be used to recommend surgical treatment after primary patellar dislocation. This case-control study aimed to determine if the patellar height index could be used to predict the incidence of RPD, and to identify the optimal method in terms of its diagnostic ability for RPD.MethodAltogether, 133 patients (52 patients with RPD [Group R] and 81 sex- and age-matched controls [Group C]) were enrolled in this study. The Insall-Salvati (IS), Blackburne-Peel (BP), Caton-Deschamps (CD), and modified IS (mIS) methods were used to measure the patellar height index. The intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities of these four methods were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive ability of each index and identify the cut-off values that indicated significantly increased risk of RPD.ResultsPatient demographics were similar between the two groups. The inter-observer and intra-observer reliabilities were good for all four methods. In patients with RPD, the mean index values for the four methods were significantly higher than those in the matched controls. The area under the curve (AUC) values for IS, BP, CD, and mIS were 0.91 (standard error [SE], 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84–0.96), 0.72 (SE, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.63–0.81), 0.86 (SE, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.79–0.92), and 0.96 (SE, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.94–0.99), respectively.ConclusionPatellar height indices had high predictive performance for the incidence of RPD. The mIS method had the highest AUC.

Framing Patellar Instability: From Diagnosis to the Treatment of the First Episode.

The patellofemoral joint (PFJ) is a complex articulation between the patella and the femur which is involved in the extensor mechanism of the knee. Patellofemoral disorders can be classified into objective patellar instability, potential patellar instability, and patellofemoral pain syndrome. Anatomical factors such as trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, and the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance contribute to instability. Patellofemoral instability can result in various types of dislocations, and the frequency of dislocation can be categorized as recurrent, habitual, or permanent. Primary patellar dislocation requires diagnostic framing, including physical examination and imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for assessing the extent of damage, such as bone bruises, osteochondral fractures, and medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) rupture. Treatment options for primary dislocation include urgent surgery for osteochondral fragments or conservative treatment for cases without lesions. Follow-up after treatment involves imaging screening and assessing principal and secondary factors of instability. Detecting and addressing these factors is crucial for preventing recurrent dislocations and optimizing patient outcomes.

PATELLAR DISLOCATION AND PATELLAR INSTABILITY PANORAMIC REVIEW

Introduction: Primary patellar dislocation is usually the initial manifestation of patellofemoral instability. Among the long-term repercussions of this disorder are recurrent dislocation and indefinable knee dysfunction. At present, there is no agreement on the optimal treatment of patellar dislocation. Objective: to detail the current information related to patellar dislocation, epidemiology, mechanism of action, clinical evaluation, imaging evaluation, classification, differential diagnosis, treatment and complications of the disease. Methodology: a total of 30 articles were analyzed in this review, including review and original articles, as well as clinical cases, of which 22 bibliographies were used because the other articles were not relevant to this study. The sources of information were PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane; the terms used to search for information in Spanish, Portuguese and English were: patella, knee anatomy, patellar dislocation, knee instability. Results: Approximately 5% of the time it is related to osteochondral fractures. To define whether a patella is high or low, a lateral radiograph should be taken with the knee in 30° of flexion to determine Blumensaats line. The increase in the Q angle facilitates patellar dislocation. Most patellar dislocations are related to congenital anomalies of the patella or trochlea, high patella, hypoplasia of the vastus medialis and hypertrophy of the lateral retinaculum. Conclusions: Patellar dislocation is usual in individuals with connective tissue disorders and hypermobility, the patella can be dislocated laterally, superiorly or intra-articularly, presenting different mechanisms of action for each case. It is important to have a good knowledge of the anatomy and to measure the Q angle because the increase of this angle facilitates patellar dislocation. It is essential to establish the etiology of the dislocation, especially in those with recurrent dislocations as this may alter the management plan. In addition to the clinical evaluation it is important to request anteroposterior, lateral knee and axial projections. When conservative treatment is chosen, reduction and immobilization with a cast or orthosis should be performed with the knee in extension, the long knee brace can be used, with or without arthrocentesis to relieve the symptomatology; surgical treatment is mostly used in recurrent dislocations. At the moment, no surgical technique is able to correct all the problems of patellar alignment. It should be kept in mind that the surgical procedure should take into account the individuals age, diagnosis, activity level and the situation of the patellofemoral joint. Patellofemoral instability should be treated with the goal of correcting all of the alignment issues. The usual complications are loss of knee mobility, recurrent dislocation and patellofemoral pain. KEY WORDS: dislocation, patella, knee, instability.

Incidence and concomitant chondral injuries in a consecutive cohort of primary traumatic patellar dislocations examined with sub-acute MRI

PurposeTo present age- and sex-specific cumulative annual incidences of primary traumatic lateral patellar dislocation (LPD) and to detail patient characteristics and concomitant chondral injuries including osteochondral fractures, as visualized on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in a large consecutive cohort of knee-injured individuals.MethodsData on primary traumatic lateral patellar dislocations were collected from a large consecutive cohort of knee injuries examined with sub-acute MRI in a single centre with a well-defined catchment area. Annual incidences for different age-groups in relation to gender were calculated together with the risk of concomitant chondral and osteochondral injury, during sports and in general.ResultsA total of 184 primary patellar dislocations were identified in the cohort of 1145 acute knee injuries (n=175) and surgical records (n=9). Knee MRI was performed within a median of six days of injury. Median age of patients with primary LPD was 16 years (interquartile range, 14–21; range, 9–47) and 41% were females. Males were significantly older than females at the time of injury (median age 17 vs. 15, P = 0.021) and sustained their primary LPD during sports more often than females (65 vs. 40%, P < 0.001). Primary LPD occurred most frequently at the age of 13 to 15 years where the annual incidence was 125 (95% CI, 96–160) per 100,000 persons. The overall annual incidence of primary LPD was 14 (95% CI, 12–16) per 100,000 persons, with a predominance of males versus females (17 vs. 11, P = 0.01). Concomitant lesions to joint surfaces were displayed on MRI or during surgery in 75 (43%) knees. Osteochondral fractures were seen in 32 knees (18%). We found no statistically significant difference in the risk of osteochondral fracture between those injured during sports or during leisure activity (14 vs. 24%, P = 0.08).ConclusionsThe annual incidence of first-time patellar dislocation was found to be 14 per 100,000 individuals with the highest incidence found among those aged 13–15 years. Primary LPD was more common among males and was sustained during sports activity in 55% of the cases. Associated injuries to the chondral surfaces should be expected in 43% of knees with primary LPD where 18% represent osteochondral fractures.

Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating patellar dislocation.

Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating patellar dislocation.

Incidence of primary patellar dislocation in Colombia

Introduction and objectivesPrimary acute patellar dislocations (PAPD) account for 3% of all traumatic knee lesions, and several studies have estimated the general incidence of patellar dislocation to be between 2 and 77.4 per 100,000 person-years. Few studies have evaluated the incidence of primary lateral patellar dislocation in Latin America. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of patellar dislocation in patients from a reference center in the Colombian southwest, report trends in the incidence of dislocation, and describe the rate of surgical treatment. Materials and methodsWe performed an observational, analytical, cross-sectional study including all patients older than 9 years old with primary lateral patellar dislocation (PLPD), between January 2011 and June 2018, in a tertiary care center in Latin America. ResultsIn our population, the incidence of primary lateral patellar dislocation (PLPD) was 32.38 per 100,000 person-years. The age group between 14 and 18 years old had the highest incidence (187.74 per 100.000). In the 10 to 13-year-old group, females had a significantly higher incidence (179.05 vs 59.85 /100,000, p-value<0.001). ConclusionsWith an incidence of 32.38 per 100,000 person- years, primary patellar dislocation is a frequent orthopaedic injury in our population. The peak incidence by age group was in adolescents between 14 to 18 years old.

Predictors of Occult Chondral Injury Sustained After a Primary Patellar Dislocation.

Background and objectivePrimary patellar dislocations can concomitantly involve osteochondral injuries for which prompt recognition is paramount for joint preservation. These injuries can be missed on radiographs, necessitating MRI examinations. In this study, we aimed to identify patient parameters that correlate with occult osteochondral injuries.MethodsPatients were retrospectively identified between 2015 and 2020 through a chart review. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients diagnosed with a primary patellar dislocation with three radiographic views and an MRI of the injured knee. Demographic and radiographic data were evaluated.ResultsA total of 61 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were no statistically significant demographic differences between patients with osteochondral injuries and those without (p>0.05). Seven knees (88%) with an osteochondral lesion and 20 (38%) without had an effusion (p=0.02). There was no association in terms of ligamentous laxity (p=0.49), Caton-Deschamps index (CDI) (p=0.68), sulcus angle (SA) (p=0.68), congruence angle (CA) (p=0.56), and lateral patellofemoral angle (LPFA) (p=0.25) between patients with and without an occult osteochondral injury.ConclusionAmong the parameter examined, the presence of an effusion was the only one that correlated with the presence of occult osteochondral injury in our cohort.

High Rates of Damage to the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament, Lateral Trochlea, and Patellar Crest After Acute Patellar Dislocation: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis

The primary outcome of interest of this study was to determine the frequency, location, and extent of chondral injuries and medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) tears, along with the rate of loose bodies, in the knee after acute primary patellar dislocation. The secondary outcome of interest was to conduct a multivariate analysis to investigate whether the presence of pathoanatomic abnormalities, including structural differences in the knees of the patients, is associated with the features of the lesions. Patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging after primary acute patellar dislocation were identified from our institutional databases. We analyzed a total of 175 magnetic resonance imaging scans of patients aged between 14 and 25 years who were eligible for inclusion. Chondral damage to the medial facet of the patella was present in 36 patients; patellar crest, 78 patients; and lateral patellar facet, 28 patients. One patient presented with chondral defects in the medial trochlear facet, whereas 118 patients showed chondral defects in the lateral trochlear facet. Loose bodies were present in 142 patients. A total of 161 patients (92%) showed MPFL damage. The patellar portion was affected in 119 patients. Of the patients, 28 showed a partially damaged MPFL (<50%), 42 showed MPFL damage greater than 50%, and 49 presented with a complete tear of the MPFL. MPFL lesions were observed on the femoral side in 42 patients. Fourteen patients presented with an avulsion fracture on the patellar side; 28 patients, on the femoral side. The MPFL was injured in 92% of 175 patients after a first-time acute patellar dislocation. Chondral damage was most frequent at the patellar crest, followed by the lateral femoral epicondyle. No association was found between patella alta, the sulcus angle, the Q angle, the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance, trochlear and patellar dysplasia, and soft-tissue damage. Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

Primary and recurrent patellar dislocation: recommendation fordiagnostic evaluation, risk stratification and treatment

The dogma that (every) primary patellar dislocation should be treated non-operatively is considered outdated. Therefore, every first-time dislocation, as well as every recurrent dislocation, should be fully diagnosed with regard to the injury pattern and anatomically predisposing risk factors. This enables the use of risk stratification models to assess the risk of recurrent episodes of instability, thereby supporting the clinical decision-making process. The reconstruction of the MPFL can be considered an established and successful treatment strategy for patellar instability. However, the additional correction of bony risk factors is often useful. In this context, the preoperative grading of the Jsign and dynamic assessment of patellar instability (dynamic apprehension test) are of utmost importance. These findings, combined with the radiographic imaging findings, can be used as a clinical decision aid for a bony correction procedure.

Risk assessment and management of primary patellar dislocation is complex and multifactorial: a survey of Australian knee surgeons

ObjectivesRecurrent patellar instability following first-time lateral patellar dislocation is associated with a variety of bony, soft tissue and patient-related risk factors. The specific management of recurrent dislocation may vary depending on the presence and combination of these factors as well as the treating physician’s interpretation of these. Therefore, this study aimed to determine which factors Australian knee surgeons regard as increasing the risk of recurrence following first-time patellar dislocation and to characterise the surgical decision-making process of these surgeons in the management of lateral patellar instability.MethodsAn online survey was sent to all active members of the Australian Knee Society (AKS). The survey addressed (i) risk factors for recurrence following first-time patellar dislocation and (ii) the surgical decision-making process in treating patellar instability.ResultsSeventy-seven per cent (53 of 69) Australian Knee Society members responded. Factors identified by respondents as significantly increasing the risk of recurrence were a history of contralateral recurrent patellar dislocation (74% respondents), an atraumatic injury mechanism (57%), trochlear dysplasia (49%) younger age (45%), patella alta (43%) and generalised ligamentous laxity (42%). Forty-four per cent replied that there may be an indication for surgical intervention following first-time patellar dislocation with no apparent loose body present. All respondents would recommend operative management of recurrent patellar dislocation after a third episode, with 45% of surgeons recommending surgery after a second episode. The most common surgical procedures performed by respondents were medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction (94%), tibial tuberosity medialisation (91%) and tibial tuberosity distalisation (85%). Only 23% of respondents consider trochleoplasty for primary surgical intervention.ConclusionSurgeons identified a large number of factors that they use to assess risk of recurrence following first-time patellar dislocation, many of which are not supported by the literature. The two highest ranked factors (history of contralateral recurrent patellar dislocation and an atraumatic injury mechanism) are without a significant evidence base. There was considerable variation in the criteria used to make the decision to perform a patellar stabilisation procedure. MPFL reconstruction was the most commonly used procedure, either in isolation or combined with another procedure.Level of evidenceCross-sectional study; expert opinion (Level V).

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patellofemoral Morphometry Reveals Age and Gender Variations in the Knees of Children and Adolescents.

Background: The morphology and alignment of the patellofemoral joint are crucial risk factors for patellar instability, and the incidence of acute primary patellar dislocation is the highest in women in their second decade of life. The purpose of the study was to analyze age and gender variations of the patellofemoral joint using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: A total of 852 patients aged between 4 and 18 years with a history of knee MRI examinations were screened for eligibility and 663 patients (470 males, 193 females) were included. Patients were divided into groups according to age and sex. The age group was divided into five groups (Group 1, 4–6 years; Group 2, 7–9 years; Group 3, 10–12 years; Group 4, 13–15 years; and Group 5, 16–18 years). Three orthopaedic surgeons measured MRI parameters reflecting the patellofemoral morphology (sulcus angle, lateral trochlear inclination, trochlear facet symmetry, and femoral depth) and alignment (tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance, percent sulcus location, and percent tibia tuberosity location). Results: Parameters including tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance, sulcus angle, percent tibial tuberosity location, trochlear facet symmetry, and femoral depth showed significant differences between the age groups (p < 0.05). The sulcus angle decreased fin Group 2, and the femoral depth showed an increasing trend with aging in male patients. However, the sulcus angle in females decreased first and then increased in Group 3 as the inflection point. The femoral depth showed an opposite pattern. Conclusions: Patellofemoral morphometry showed age and gender variation. Notably, the sulcus angle and femoral depth were significantly different between males and females and changed according to the development. These findings may reflect the sex difference and peak incidence of the patellar instability risk. Understanding the morphological changes and differences of the patellofemoral joint may facilitate the diagnosis of patellofemoral pathologies.

Patellar instability: will my patella dislocate again?

The incidence of patellar instability in pediatric patients ranges is 50-100 in 100,000 patients per year. Risk of recurrent dislocations however has been cited from 8.6% to 88% depending on individual patient factors. This manuscript highlights the demographical, historical, and anatomic factors associated with recurrent patellar instability following a first-time patella dislocation in the pediatric population. In recent years, various studies have focused on identifying risk factors for recurrent patellar instability following a primary patellar dislocation. A mix of patient factors, including age of first dislocation, patella alta, elevated tibial tubercle to trochlear groove and trochlear dysplasia have all been noted in the literature, which have helped to develop various scoring tools to predict recurrent dislocation following nonoperative treatment. Risk of recurrent patellar instability in patients who have previously suffered a patellar dislocation can be due to many factors. These risk factors should be used and applied to a variety of risk scores in order to provide physicians and healthcare providers with a tool to counsel patients and families on their patellar redislocation risk and help guide further management.

Conservative versus tailored surgical treatment in patients with first time lateral patella dislocation: a randomized-controlled trial

BackgroundPatellar instability has a high incidence and occurs particularly in young and female patients. If the patella dislocates for the first time, treatment is usually conservative. However, this cautious approach carries the risk of recurrence and of secondary pathologies such as osteochondral fractures. Moreover, there is also risk of continuous symptoms apparent, as recurrent patella dislocation is related to patellofemoral osteoarthritis as well. An initial surgical treatment could possibly avoid these consequences of recurrent patella dislocation.MethodsA prospective, randomized-controlled trial design is applied. Patients with unilateral first-time patella dislocation will be considered for participation. Study participants will be randomized to either conservative treatment or to a tailored patella stabilizing treatment. In the conservative group, patients will use a knee brace and will be prescribed outpatient physical therapy. The surgical treatment will be performed in a tailored manner, addressing the pathologic anatomy that predisposes to patella dislocation.The Banff Patellofemoral Instability-Instrument 2.0, recurrence rate, apprehension test, joint degeneration, and the Patella Instability Severity Score will serve as outcome parameters. The main analysis will focus on the difference in change of the scores between the two groups within a 2-year follow-up.Statistical analysis will use linear mixed models. Power analysis was done for the comparison of the two study arms at 2-year follow-up with regard to the BPII Score. A sample size of N = 64 per study arm (128 overall) provides 80% power (alpha = 0.05, two-tailed) to detect a difference of 0.5 standard deviations in a t-test for independent samples.DiscussionAlthough several studies have already dealt with this issue, there is still no consensus on the ideal treatment concept for primary patellar dislocation. Moreover, most of these studies show a unified surgical group, which means that all patients were treated with the same surgical procedure. This is regarded as a major limitation as surgical treatment of patella dislocation should depend on the patient’s anatomic pathologies leading to patellar instability. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating whether patients with primary patella dislocation are better treated conservatively or operatively with tailored surgery to stabilize the patella.Trial registrationThe study will be prospectively registered in the publicly accessible database www.ClinicalTrials.gov.

Increased tibial tubercle-trochlear groove and patellar height indicate a higher risk of recurrent patellar dislocation following medial reefing

PurposeIdentifying anatomical risk factors on recurrent dislocation after medial reefing is important for deciding surgical treatment. The present study aimed to retrospectively analyze the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based parameters of patients treated with medial reefing and whether these parameters lead to a higher risk of recurrent dislocation.MethodsFifty-five patients (18.6 ± 6.6 years) who underwent medial reefing after primary traumatic patellar dislocation (84% with medial patellofemoral ligament [MPFL] rupture) were included. Patients were followed up for at least 24 months postoperatively (3.8 ± 1.2 years) to assess the incidence of recurrent patellar dislocation. In patients without recurrent dislocation, the Kujala and subjective IKDC scores were assessed. Moreover, the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG), sulcus angle, patellar tilt, patellar shift, and lateral trochlea index (LTI) were measured. The patellar height was measured using the Caton-Dechamps (CDI), Blackburne-Peel (BPI), and Insall-Salvati index (ISI). The cohort was subclassified into two groups with and without recurrent dislocation. Differences between groups were analyzed with respect to the MRI parameters.ResultsForty percent had a pathological sulcus angle of > 145°, 7.2% had an LTI of < 11°, 47.3% had a patellar tilt of > 20°, and 36.4% had a TT-TG of ≥ 16 mm. Increased patellar height was observed in 34.5, 65.5, and 34.5% of the patients as per CDI, BPI, and ISI, respectively. Nineteen (34.5%) patients suffered from recurrent dislocation. Compared with patients without recurrent dislocation, those with recurrent dislocation had a significantly lower LTI (p = 0.0467). All other parameters were not significantly different between the groups. Risk factor analysis showed higher odds ratios (OR > 2), although not statistically significant, for MPFL rupture (OR 2.05 [95% confidence interval 0.38–11.03], LTI (6.6 [0.6–68.1]), TT-TG (2.9 [0.9–9.2]), and patellar height according to ISI (2.3 [0.7–7.5]) and CDI (2.3 [0.7–7.5])). Patients without recurrent dislocation had a Kujala score of 93.7 ± 12.1 (42–100) points and an IKDC score of 90.6 ± 11.7 (55.2–100) points.ConclusionAnatomical, MRI-based parameters should be considered before indicating medial reefing. A ruptured MPFL, an LTI < 11°, a TT-TG ≥ 16 mm, a patellar tilt > 20 mm, and an increased patellar height according to ISI and CDI were found to be associated, although not significantly, with a higher risk (OR > 2) of recurrent patellar dislocation after medial reefing. Thorough preoperative analysis is crucial to reduce the risk of recurrent dislocation in young patient cohorts.Level of evidenceLevel IV

Medial Patellofemoral Complex Advancement for Recurrent Lateral Patellar Instability and Selective Acute Primary Patellar Dislocations

Medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) is considered as the primary medial patellar restraint and has a static, as well as dynamic, component. MPFL reconstruction (MPFL-R) restores only the static component of MPFC, is associated with multiple technical concerns, and has a steep learning curve. Need for physeal sparing techniques and relatively high rates of complications including patella fracture are some other concerns with MPFL-R. We propose a simple procedure for advancement of MPFC onto patella, which is indicated in most of the recurrent lateral instabilities (with a positive lateral glide test result and an intact MPFL on magnetic resonance imaging). The procedure is also indicated in selective acute primary dislocations—those with associated chondral lesions and magnetic resonance imaging–documented isolated patellar side avulsion/injury. MPFC advancement is a more anatomical procedure that also restores dynamic medial checkrein of patella and can be performed even by a novice surgeon. MPFC advancement is devoid of the multiple technicalities of MPFL-R, does not require intraoperative imaging or any postoperative immobilization, and renders complications like donor graft-site morbidity and patella fractures irrelevant. It requires no modifications in patients with open physes and can be performed in isolation or with other procedures as per à la carte principle.

原发性髌骨脱位在保守治疗与手术治疗长期比较的荟萃分析

原发性髌骨脱位在保守治疗与手术治疗长期比较的荟萃分析