Primary Health Care Centers Research Articles

Factors Influencing the Skill Level of Primary Healthcare Workers in Managing Paediatric Emergencies

Paediatric emergencies continue to be a significant public health concern in Nigeria, particularly in rural areas where primary healthcare centers (PHCs) often serve as the sole source of medical care. The ability of healthcare workers in these settings to effectively manage paediatric emergencies is crucial for improving child health outcomes. This study aimed to assess the factors influencing the skill level of primary healthcare workers in managing paediatric emergencies in Zaria, Nigeria. A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among 139 randomly selected healthcare workers in Sabon Gari and Zaria Local Government Areas. A pre-tested questionnaire was used to collect data on socio-demographic characteristics, work experience, and skills in managing paediatric emergencies. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21. The results revealed that healthcare workers in PHCs in Zaria exhibited varying levels of skills in managing paediatric emergencies. Several factors were identified as influencing their skill levels. Healthcare workers with higher academic qualifications demonstrated significantly better skills in managing paediatric emergencies. This suggests that formal education plays a crucial role in developing the necessary competencies. While experience can be a valuable asset, the study did not find a strong association between years of experience and skill levels. This may indicate that experience alone is not sufficient for developing the necessary skills, and additional training and support may be required. Healthcare workers who had received recent training or participated in continuing medical education (CME) programs related to paediatric emergency management tended to have higher skill levels. This highlights the importance of ongoing professional development in maintaining and improving skills. The findings of this study suggest that a combination of factors influences the skill level of primary healthcare workers in managing paediatric emergencies. While academic qualifications are important, ongoing training and access to resources are also essential. It is crucial to address these factors through targeted interventions to improve the skills of healthcare workers and enhance the quality of care provided to children in need. This study highlights the critical need for targeted interventions to improve the skills of primary healthcare workers in managing paediatric emergencies in Zaria, Nigeria. By addressing factors such as academic qualifications, training, resource availability, and work environment, policymakers and healthcare providers can significantly enhance the quality of care provided to children in need.

Challenges to the Digital Inclusion of Women in a Vulnerable Area in ColombiaDesafios da inclusão digital das mulheres em uma área vulnerável na Colômbia

To identify women's technological capabilities and describe their appropriation and use of technology in a community in a vulnerable area of Colombia. Observational cross-sectional study conducted in the subregion of Urabá, Colombia. A survey was conducted in primary health care centers, in which 1478 women between 18 and 49 years of age responded to questions about their technological capabilities, their experience with the use of web-based information, and their appropriation of technology. Access to and use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) varied according to age, educational level, and socioeconomic stratum, with observed differences in preferences and critical consumption of information. The women in this study faced multiple access barriers to appropriate use of ICTs for health promotion. The appropriation of these tools in Colombia, specifically in the Urabá subregion, is a complex challenge that requires a comprehensive and multidimensional approach.

Investigating the Use and Sustainable Adoption of Digital Health Tools for Public Health Emergencies in Primary Healthcare Centres in Northern Nigeria

Investigating the Use and Sustainable Adoption of Digital Health Tools for Public Health Emergencies in Primary Healthcare Centres in Northern Nigeria

Perception of parents on barriers and facilitators of treatment outcomes among children and adolescents attending psychotherapy services in a primary health care centre in Belize

Background: The study assessed the perception of parents on barriers and facilitators treatment outcomes among children and adolescents attending psychotherapy services in a primary health care centre. Methods: A cross sectional descriptive study using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative method used retrospective review of records of 65 children and adolescent clients who accessed psychotherapy services between January 2022 and December 2023 at Port Loyola Health Centre in Belize city. The qualitative method used in-depth interviews of twenty parents of the patients randomly selected from the clinic registers. Univariate and bivariate analyses was used for the quantitative data while thematic analysis was used for the qualitative data. Results: 25 (38.5%) of the patients completed their treatment and 34 (52.3%) dropped out, with half dropped out after the first visit. The identified parental perceived barriers and facilitators are organized into four main themes. The first theme was related to knowledge and understanding of mental health problems by the parents which showed that respondents had good knowledge about mental health problems. The second theme identified attitudes towards treatment as a major factor to completion of treatment. The third theme was related to structural factors like transportation cost and parents’ work schedule identified as key barriers. The fourth theme was related to inconvenient appointment time and lack of flexibility in the scheduling of appointment at the clinic. Conclusions: The study highlights key areas of interventions to minimize barriers to completion of treatment among children accessing mental health services.

PHC visits trends effects on control of blood pressure for hypertensive patients following up in PHCs in Makkah, Saudi Arabia

Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, stroke, and kidney disease. In Saudi Arabia, the prevalence of hypertension is estimated to be 14%. Primary health care centers (PHCCs) play a major role in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of hypertensive patients in Saudi Arabia. This study employed a cross-sectional design to collect data from medical records of hypertension patients registered with primary health care centers (PHCCs) in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. The data was obtained through a comprehensive review of these medical records. Out of the 16,623 patients included in the study, the average annual visit frequency was 5.5 for females and 6 for males. 65.6% (10,910 patients) completed all four annual visits. There was no statistically significant difference in visit completion rates between males and females. The visit count was found to be negatively correlated with Systolic BP (-0.151, 95% CI [-0.195, -0.165]), Diastolic BP (-0.137, 95% CI [-0.147, -0.117]), and MAP (-0.176, 95% CI [-0.191, -0.161]), with a P-value < 0.001 for all parameters. Our findings indicate that the number of visits to Makkah Primary Health Centers positively influences blood pressure control in hypertensive patients.

Atrial fibrillation, prevention and rehabilitation in a primary healthcare setting. A feasibility study

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) often influences daily life with symptoms like palpitations, dyspnoea, fatigue, fear and anxiety. Research show that patients with AF benefit from prevention and rehabilitation interventions. However, evidence is scarce and mainly hospital-based, and it is unknown whether the transition to the primary healthcare sector gives the same positive results. In 2019, a Danish primary care Health Center and the cardiology department at the local hospital completed a multidimensional prevention and rehabilitation intervention for patients with AF. Purpose To investigate the feasibility of delivering a multidimensional prevention and rehabilitation intervention for patients with AF in a primary care Health Center. Methods This study was a mixed-methods, non-randomized, intervention, feasibility study. A convergent mixed-methods design was used, and results were illustrated in side-by-side joint displays. Patients were included at a Hospital AF clinic referring to the Health Center. The prevention and rehabilitation intervention consisted of risk factor management, patient education, physical activity and yoga. Two patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) were used, the HeartQoL measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) measuring symptoms of anxiety and depression. Data were collected at baseline (T0), at end of intervention (T1), and at two-months follow-up (T2) and analysed descriptively. Focus group interviews were analysed thematically and covered experiences of participating, needs and preferences, outcomes and feasibility of collecting PROMs. The reporting was guided by the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) extension to pilot and feasibility trials. Results 43 patients (53% women; median age 66 (range 52-81) years) completed the intervention. Table 1 shows that HRQoL increased, and symptoms of anxiety and depression decreased. These results maintained at follow-up. Figure 1 shows the qualitative themes. Patients experienced being understood and supported by health professionals and peers. They thought it difficult to know what their needs were. However, some patients had specific preferences for interventions. For changes in outcomes, the patients identified that gaining tools and knowledge about the disease from the interventions helped. It was feasible to collect PROMs during the intervention and finally, the patients had an attention to what comes next, when finishing the intervention in the primary care setting. Conclusion It was feasible to deliver a multidimensional prevention and rehabilitation intervention for patients with AF at a primary care Health Center. HRQoL increased and symptoms of anxiety and depression decreased. The patients experienced being supported and gaining tools and knowledge to handle AF. Future large randomized controlled trials must confirm these results.

Evaluating the psychological antecedents of vaccination in applicants to primary health care centers

Abstract Background Vaccine acceptance can be enhanced by understanding the psychological antecedents of vaccination. The 5C model identifies relevant factors: confidence, complacency, constraints, calculation, and collective responsibility. This study aims to evaluate these factors among primary health care center applicants in Ankara. Methods A total of 1712 individuals aged 18 and over, who visited primary health care centers, participated in the study. The face-to-face survey included questions about sociodemographic characteristics, Vaccination Psychological Antecedents Scale, individuals’ attitudes and behaviors towards vaccination, and internet usage. Factors with a significance level of p < 0.20 from previous analyses were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The factors influencing the decision to get vaccinated without hesitation when necessary were investigated. Results The likelihood of getting vaccinated without hesitation in necessary situations is higher among those with higher income than expenditure(OR:1,517, 95%CI=1,094-2,104), those without chronic diseases in their family(OR:1,411, 95%CI=1,109-1,795), and those who do not actively use social media(OR:1,380, 95%CI=1,051-1,813). Additionally, an increase in the confidence score(OR:1,276, 95%CI=1,239-1,315) and the collective responsibility score(OR:1,096, 95%CI=1,058-1,134), was associated with an increased likelihood, while an increase in the calculation dimension(OR:0,928, 95%CI=0,895-0,962) was associated with a decreased likelihood. Conclusions Income status, presence of chronic illness in the family, active social media usage, confidence, collective responsibility, and calculation are factors influencing vaccine acceptance without hesitation. Communication strategies based on trust and collective responsibility should be developed to improve vaccine acceptance. The risk factors causing vaccine hesitancy among social media users should be investigated, and measures should be taken. Key messages • Develop trust-based, collective responsibility-focused communication to boost vaccine acceptance. • Investigate and address social media-driven vaccine hesitancy.

An intersectional approach on menstrual inequity as lived by women in circumstances of socioeconomic vulnerability in an urban and rural setting in Spain: a qualitative study

Since menstrual health and menstrual inequity are determined by social power structures, this study proposes to analyse, from an intersectional perspective, the experiences of menstrual inequity of women and people who menstruate (PWM) (≥18 years) under circumstances of socioeconomic vulnerability in an urban and rural setting in Catalonia (Spain), focusing on menstrual poverty, menstrual management and access to health care for menstrual health. An exploratory and interpretative qualitative study was conducted. Venue-based convenience sampling was carried out, recruiting women from a non-governmental organisation and a primary health care centre. Eighteen individual semi-structured interviews were conducted between October 2022 and February 2023. Data were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis. Analysis revealed that menstrual care was generally a distant preoccupation that revolved around circumstances of socioeconomic vulnerability, housing, and productive/reproductive work. Menstrual poverty, menstrual management and menstrual self-care challenges, barriers to accessing health care for menstrual health, and menstrual taboo, stigma and discrimination were commonplace and deepened by socioeconomic vulnerability. In this way, women’s menstrual experiences were rooted in intersecting axes of inequity, based on gender, race and class. Intersectional and critical participatory research, policy and practice are imperative to develop counter mechanisms that confront systems of privilege-oppression to modulate menstrual experience, health and equity.

Real world data after the implementation of coronary computed tomography angiography in Swedish primary care to rule out coronary artery disease, a cross-sectional study based on pre-test probability

Abstract Background In primary care, most patients with of non-acute chest pain will neither receive a heart related diagnosis nor be referred to a cardiologist. Studies indicate a better cardiovascular prognosis in chest pain patients referred to Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) as compared to risk stratification solely based on risk prediction instruments(1). CCTA is recommended since 2019 for low to intermediate cardiovascular (CV) risk patients(2). In the study setting, the primary care has implemented CCTA as first line test for patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and a Pre-Test Probability (PTP) of <15% and any CV risk factor, with PTP mandatorily entered in the referral letters. Purpose To study the outcome of CCTA based on referred PTP values categorised into <5%, 5-15% and >15%. We hypothesized that the presence of significant stenosis would be on par with the mean PTP. Methods In this cross-sectional retrospective cohort study, all consecutive clinical referrals for a CCTA from primary health care centres with a catchment area of ~470 000 inhabitants in the country of Sweden between 1 June 2021 and 7 Dec. 2022, with PTP estimates and completed CCTA were included. CCTA findings were stratified as normal, atheromatosis, or significant stenosis (≥50% coronary lumen obstruction). Patient baseline characteristics routinely registered on the day of CCTA was retrieved from a nationwide quality registry, SWEDEHEART(3). Pearsons’s Chi2 and one-way ANOVA was used to test differences in group distributions. Results During the study period, 381 patients with a PTP had obtained CCTA, of which 75% (n=286) had PTP <15%. The mean age was 60 years (standard deviation [SD] 11), 70% were female, 30% were prescribed lipid-lowering medication and 47% anti-hypertensives (Table 1). In total, the mean PTP was 12.4% (SD 8.7) and in 18% a suspected significant stenosis was identified. (Figure 1). Among patients referred with PTP 5-15%, the presence of suspected significant stenosis was 12% and cardiology consultation was less frequently described than for PTP <5 or ≥15% (14% vs 33% vs 44%, p < 0.001). Conclusions This study indicates that PTP is an efficient means to select patients for CCTA in primary care. In total, about 1/5 had a suspected significant stenosis, which often requires further investigations, and about 4/5 could be reassured that symptoms were not due to coronary artery disease. In 31% atheromatosis was identified, potentially facilitating counselling on CV prevention. We conclude that CCTA is a clinically effective option for primary care physicians to rule out CAD in patients with low PTP.Figure 1Table 1

Mammography screening among women attending primary healthcare centers in Monastir, Tunisia

Abstract Background Breast cancer is the leading cancer among women worldwide. Early detection through mammography screening improves prognosis and enhances survival rate for this disease. The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with mammography screening utilization among women attending primary healthcare centers. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in four primary healthcare centers in Monastir governorate in October 2023 using a pre-tested questionnaire. Women aged over 45 years-old were included as they were the target group in the breast cancer screening strategy. Univariate then multivariate analyses were performed in order to identify the factors associated with mammography screening utilization. Data was analyzed by SPSS 21.0. Results A total of 192 women were included in the study with a mean age of 56.7±8.8 years-old. Among them, 79.7 % (n = 153) were married and 51.6% (n = 98) had three children and less. A total of 55.3 % (n = 94) had a primary education level. Regarding participants’ practices of breast cancer screening, 35% of our participants have had mammogram. Univariate analysis showed that the knowledge about breast cancer symptoms (p = 0.015), practicing Breast self-examination (BSE) (p = 0.002), being aware about mammography (p = 0.001) and the recommended age of the screening at 45 years-old (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with adherence to breast cancer screening. Multivariate analysis revealed that practicing BSE (ORa=2.60 [95%CI: 1.22-5.55] and knowing the recommended age of mammography screening (ORa=2.28 [95%CI: 1.17-4.45] were significant (P < 0.05) predictors of mammography screening utilization. Conclusions Mammography screening rate is low. This study had provided some informations about factors influencing mammography screening. Policymakers and public health practitioners should consider the identified factors when developing intervention programs to improve breast cancer screening. Key messages • There is a need to conduct education sessions in schools to raise awareness about breast cancer screening at an early age. • Social media can be a tool for health education on mammography screening.

The effect of team-model on healthcare usage and treatment levels among people with type 2 diabetes

Abstract Background In North Karelia Finland, a team-based service model was implemented in some municipalities’ primary healthcare (PHC) centers during 2020. In this team-model, a healthcare customer contacts a nurse who initiates the service process immediately. Nurses can also consult or direct customers to other healthcare professionals and arrange physical appointments if needed. The aims of the model are improved customer and personnel experience and satisfaction, and improved quality and effectiveness of care. We assess the effect of this team-model on treatment levels, measurement activity, and health care usage among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods Patients with T2D were identified using the ICD-10 code E11 from the regional electronic health records. The data include all patients diagnosed by 2016 who were alive and residing in North Karelia in 2023 (N = 6312). Diabetes-related contacts with nurses or doctors in outpatient PHC and specialized healthcare (SHC) were considered, along with measurement activity and levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and low-density lipoproteins (LDL) between the years 2017 and 2022. Annual differences between areas were analyzed using logistic and linear mixed models. Results In 2017, patients’ mean age was 66 and age range 20-93. The proportion of men was 55% and 45% resided in team-model areas in 2023. The team-model increased T2D-related outpatient PHC remote contact with nurses for a couple of years. But eventually they decreased to a lower level than before. Additionally, the team-model reduced the number of other contacts. An increased difference between areas in measurement activity on HbA1c and LDL levels was also observed. But the difference between areas in proportion of those who achieved treatment targets stayed unchanged. Conclusions In the long-term, the team-model reduced the number of T2D-related contacts and increased the measurement activity of HbA1c and LDL, but it had no effect on treatment levels. Key messages • Team-based service models might potentially reduce service use in the long term. • More research and evidence are needed on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of team-based service models.

Cardiometabolic multimorbidity and associated risk factors in a cohort identified through community-based screening in Eastern Nepal

Abstract Background Cardiometabolic multimorbidity constitutes a major cause of premature mortality and morbidity in low- and middle-income countries like Nepal. Early detection of associated risk factors and timely management at primary care centres can significantly reduce the impact at individual level. Lack of quality research data in resource poor setting often pose a challenge to plan for efficient delivery of health services. Purpose This analysis of secondary data from a cohort identified through a community based NCD intervention program intends to explore the distribution of cardiometabolic multimorbidity and associated risk factors in adult population of Eastern Nepal. Methods This report is a part of integrated NCD management strategy, a KHDC (Kidney, Hypertension, Diabetes, and Cardiovascular disease) program, implemented through community-based screening and interventions focused on primary level healthcare centres. The KHDC program involved screening of 14,517 individuals aged 18 years and above at baseline during a period of 2019-2023 for selected NCDs, including, cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, diabetes, and kidney disease. Individual level data was collected through anthropometric measurements, participants’ self-report, vitals assessment, laboratory parameters and diagnostic adjuncts including ECG and Echocardiography. Outcome of cardiometabolic multimorbidity1 was defined as presence of two or more of diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular diseases including myocardial infarction and stroke. Results About 12.8% (n=1862) of the participants had at least one cardiometabolic multimorbidity, while less than one per cent (n=47) had two or more multimorbidity. Presence of at least one multimorbidity was associated with older age ≥ 40 years [OR: 3.870 (95% CI: 3.285-4.558)], male gender [OR: 1.326 (95% CI: 1.202-1.463)], BMI ≥ 23 kg/cm2 [OR: 1.348 (95% CI: 1.208-1.503)], current tobacco consumption [OR: 1.164 (95% CI: 1.038-1.305)] and co-occurrence of hypertension [OR: 1.736 (95% CI: 1.550-1.943)]. The presence of both diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease was associated with age ≥ 40 years [OR: 7.612 (95% CI: 1.846-31.395)] and co-occurrence of hypertension [OR: 2.544 (95% CI: 1.401-4.620)]. Conclusion Disproportionate burden of cardiometabolic multimorbidity was apparent among adult population screened in our program. Older age and co-occurrence of hypertension was identified as contributing factors for the presence of such multimorbidity. A baseline information on the distribution and risk factors for the same among general population can provide a valuable insight into understanding the disease progression and prognostic outcomes.Table of Outcomes

Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of Interactive Breastfeeding Scale

Objective: To assess factors influencing mother-child interaction during breastfeeding and validate the Arabic version of the Interactive Breastfeeding Scale (IBfS). Methods: A descriptive (cross- sectional study design) was carried out to evaluate the factors that interfere with the mother-child interaction during breastfeeding. A non-probability 'purposive sample' consists of (377) mothers who attending primary health care centers in Baghdad City. The study was started at January/2024 to July / 2024. Results: The Arabic version of the Interactive Breastfeeding Scale reveals strong psychometric properties with Cronbach’s Alpha values ranging from 0.71 to 0.86. Significant correlations were found between the scale and factors like Mother’s Perspective (r = .886) and Child Perspective (r = .661). The findings highlight the importance of mother and child-related factors in breastfeeding experiences. Conclusions: The Arabic version of the Interactive Breastfeeding Scale (IBfS) demonstrates strong reliability and validity, making it a robust tool for assessing breastfeeding dynamics. Key factors such as Mother’s Perspective and Child Perspective show significant correlations with IBfS, underscoring their critical role in the breastfeeding experience. The scale’s psychometric properties support its use in diverse settings, providing valuable insights into mother-child interactions during breastfeeding.

Work engagement in public primary healthcare centers: psychometric analysis of a scale for its evaluation

PurposeThis study aims to validate the 17-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-17) within Public Primary Healthcare Centers, addressing the need for a reliable measure of work engagement among health workers.Design/methodology/approachThis study conducted a validity and reliability analysis of the UWES-17 among community health workers in Chile, exploring its psychometric properties and structure, focusing on its three-factor structure and examining the causal relationships between work engagement dimensions.FindingsThe UWES-17 demonstrated a valid and reliable three-factor structure among Chilean health workers, with a significant construct dependence among its dimensions –vigor, dedication and absorption – highlighting their interrelated nature.Research limitations/implicationsWhile validated for community health workers in Chile, the UWES-17’s applicability across healthcare settings and professions warrants further investigation.Practical implicationsThe validated UWES-17 can guide human resource practices in assessing and enhancing work engagement among health workers, potentially improving employee well-being and performance.Social implicationsAddressing work engagement and burnout among health workers is vital for a resilient healthcare system. This validated measure contributes to efforts to improve health worker well-being and healthcare service quality.Originality/valueThis study contributes a validated measure of work engagement specifically tailored to public primary healthcare centers, offering valuable insights for future research on health workers' well-being and performance. This research enhances the understanding of organizational dynamics within public healthcare settings.

Validity of the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups system on the utilisation of healthcare services in Norway: a retrospective cross-sectional study

BackgroundThe Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) System is a validated electronic risk stratification system. However, there is a lack of studies on the association between different ACG risk scores and the utilisation of different healthcare services using different sources of input data. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the validity of the association between five different ACG risk scores and the utilisation of a range of different healthcare services using input data from either general practitioners (GPs) or hospitals.MethodsRegistry-based study of all adult inhabitants in four Norwegian municipalities that received somatic healthcare in one year (N = 168 285). The ACG risk scores resource utilisation band, unscaled ACG concurrent risk, unscaled concurrent risk, frailty flag and chronic condition count were calculated using age, sex and diagnosis codes from GPs and a hospital, respectively. Healthcare utilisation covered GP, municipal and hospital services. Areas under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were calculated and compared to the AUC of a model using only age and sex.ResultsUtilisation of all healthcare services increased with increasing scores in the “resource utilisation band” (RUB) and all other investigated ACG risk scores. The risk scores overall distinguished well between levels of utilisation of GP visits (AUC up to 0.84), hospitalisation (AUC up to 0.8) and specialist outpatient visits (AUC up to 0.72), but not out-of-hours GP visits (AUC up to 0.62). The score “unscaled ACG concurrent risk” overall performed best. Risk scores based on data from either GPs or hospitals performed better for the classification of healthcare services in their respective domains. The model based on age and sex performed better for distinguishing between levels of utilisation of municipal services (AUC 0.83–0.90 compared to 0.46–0.79).ConclusionsRisk scores from the ACG system is valid for classifying GP visits, hospitalisation and specialist outpatient visits. It does not outperform simpler models in the classification of utilisation of municipal services such as nursing homes and home services and outpatient emergency care in primary healthcare. The ACG system can be applied in Norway using administrative data from either GPs or hospitals.

Utilizing laser therapy to manage oral potentially malignant disorders in older adults at the primary care level.

Oral lesions are a significant concern among older adults because they can progress to oral cancer if not diagnosed and treated promptly and effectively. Transportation to the hospital is a major barrier to oral healthcare for many older adults. The purpose of this editorial is to address the challenges of managing oral potentially malignant disorders in the older population, highlighting the barriers they face in accessing healthcare services, the potential use of laser therapy for management, and the direction of research in this area. Due to the limited access of the older to healthcare services, primary healthcare facilities within communities serve as their primary providers. Laser therapy is recommended for the management of oral potentially malignant disorders due to its favorable outcomes. This approach has been tested in several primary healthcare centers in Thailand. In our project, laser therapy was used to treat oral potentially malignant disorders in primary and secondary healthcare services. This includes photodynamic therapy for older patients with extensive lesions, as well as individuals with oral leukoplakia and erythroplakia who have declined curative surgery. It has also been used in cases of recalcitrant lichen planus to steroid or photobiomodulation therapy. This approach has been well accepted by both oral healthcare providers and patients. To expand access to these treatment options in such settings, it is critical to empower healthcare professionals, particularly dentists and dental nurses, to integrate laser techniques into geriatric care and oral cancer screening. Establishing a network foundation for orofacial laserology would also enhance the potential of such settings.

Changes in healthcare seeking behaviors among caretakers of children in the previously occupied ISIS territory: Hadeetha, Anbar, Iraq: a cross-sectional survey of 415 households.

The western province of Anbar, and the district of Hadeetha, have suffered direct impacts from the second United States led invasion (2003) through the ISIS invasion (2014-2017). With the primary health care centers being closed or inaccessible, the remaining population experienced changes in health seeking. The area of Anbar, Iraq remains largely remote from the discourse of health system recovery post-conflict. The objective of this study was to describe changes in health seeking behaviors of caregivers of children ages 12-72months of age in Hadeetha, Anbar, Iraq from the conflict period of ISIS (Islamic State of Syria and Iraq), 2014-2017, to the post-conflict period, 2021. This was a mixed-methods study composed of a cross-sectional 415 household survey and focus groups in Hadeetha, Anbar, Iraq. Caretakers of children were interviewed from February to April 2021. Children were sampled from a list of children who missed at least one vaccination appointment without a return for follow-up from the birth cohorts of 2014 to 2020. Healthcare workers focus groups and key informant interviews occurred from 2019 to 2021 centered around experiences from the 2014 to 2021 period. In the post-conflict period, there were no differences in health seeking based upon provider type between respondents. Physicians were primary healthcare providers in the post-conflict period for 79% of respondents versus only 47% in the conflict period. Healthcare workers described major barriers to delivering services in Hadeetha during the ISIS occupation due to infrastructure damage, threats of violence, decreased medical personnel, lack of compensation and disruptions in medical supplies from 2014 to 2017. This study provides insight into health seeking challenges among the many individuals who remained in Hadeetha during the ISIS occupation. Health use patterns by provider type mirror the concerns the healthcare providers shared: limited availability, efflux of professional workers, limited resources and security challenges to providing care. Positive trends toward increased access to physicians during periods of peace are an encouraging marker for continued population resilience during the post-conflict period. Recovery efforts continue to be hampered by internal sectarian discord within Iraq as well as insufficient resources to maintain health services as well as provide catch-up health services, such as immunizations.

Knowledge about cardiovascular diseases in a first-level healthcare center in Lima, Peru.

Motivation for the study. In Peru, the knowledge level of patients about their cardiovascular health is unknown at the first level of care, which receives 85% of the population, and where primary disease prevention activities are carried out. Main findings. More than 70% of people had an inadequate level of knowledge about their own cardiovascular health. Implications. Our results highlight the need to improve the education of people on cardiovascular health issues at the first level of care, taking into account that these diseases are increasingly frequent in the population. This study aimed to determine the level of knowledge about cardiovascular diseases in people in a primary healthcare center (PHCC). A descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out by surveying people who attended a PHCC in Lima, Peru. A score less than 6 was considered inadequate knowledge. A total of 400 people were surveyed, 66.3% were women and the mean age was 46.8 ± 16.2 years. The average score was 4.52 +/- 1.85. We found that 71% of those surveyed had an inadequate level of knowledge, regardless of age, gender or education level. Our findings show that the level of knowledge about risk factors and cardiovascular disease was inadequate in the primary care population. It is necessary to achieve proper specific education in cardiovascular risk factors in order to reduce the impact of these diseases.

Exploration of preschool hearing screening at primary healthcare centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study

The hearing status of children should be examined throughout early childhood, even if they have passed the newborn hearing loss because hearing loss can occur at any time and may affect their ability to learn. Preschool hearing screening (PHS) is vital to continue screening throughout early childhood. The current practice of PHS in the primary healthcare centers (PHCs) in Saudi Arabia is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate PHS in the PHCs. This cross-sectional descriptive study used an in-person-administered questionnaire to collect data. A total of 106 out of 120 participants (male = 61; female = 45) representing the PHCs in Riyadh were interviewed. Most of the participants were aged 31–40 years and held a bachelor's degree as the highest academic qualification with limited years of experience. PHS was mostly performed through subjective measures by asking the parents (71.7%) and the child (65.1%). The audiometric evaluation was conducted for preschool children in only half of the PHCs. General practitioners and nurses usually perform PHS. Substantial gaps in the practice of PHS were identified. The lack of training and appropriate instruments and the need for audiological services were the main challenges. Incorporating robust and objective protocols for PHS into the educational system is a valuable strategy for identifying hearing loss early and reducing its impact through the establishment of effective intervention plans.

Translation and Validation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire in Indonesian Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

The purpose of the study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the 24-item Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ) for Indonesian patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and evaluate its psychometric properties. Forward-backward translation, adaptation involving 7 experts, and pretesting to develop the Indonesian version of DKQ were conducted. Psychometric analysis was carried out among T2D patients from 40 primary health care centers in Indonesia. Known-group, convergent and discriminant validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed. Additionally, a descriptive item analysis was conducted. In total, 39 patients participated in the pretesting and 304 patients in the validation process and descriptive analysis. Of the 24 items, 2 were adjusted during the adaptation process, and 1 item was deleted because it did not adequately reflect the original item. Known-group validity was demonstrated because patients with younger ages, higher educational levels, and longer diabetes duration had significantly higher DKQ scores. Convergent validity was demonstrated by a significant positive correlation of the DKQ scores with overall treatment satisfaction. The 23-item DKQ Bahasa Indonesia showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.73; omega total = 0.72) and good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.87 in a sample of 27 patients). No floor and ceiling effects were found in the item analysis. The study demonstrates adequate validity and reliability of the 23-item DKQ Bahasa Indonesia for assessing diabetes knowledge in Indonesian primary care patients with T2D. This instrument can be used to identify room for improvement and develop diabetes education programs.