Primary Endpoint Of Non-inferiority Research Articles

Nine-month angiographic and 2-year clinical follow-up of the NOYA biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions: the NOYA I trial

This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the NOYA stent which is a cobalt chromium-based sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) with DL-polylactide biodegradable polymer (Medfavour Medical, Beijing, China) in treating de novo coronary artery lesions. The NOYA I trial was designed to compare the NOYA stent with the FIREBIRD2™ stent, a durable polymer SES widely used in China (MicroPort Medical, Shanghai, China); the trial was a non-inferiority trial with a primary angiographic endpoint of the in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) at nine-month follow-up. The secondary endpoints were binary restenosis rates within nine months, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target lesion revascularisation (TLR), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) at 24-month follow-up. A total of 300 patients (n=150 in each group) were enrolled in the study from 16 Chinese centres. The LLL in the NOYA group at nine-month follow-up was similar to the FIREBIRD2 group (0.11±0.18 mm vs. 0.14±0.23 mm, p=0.16; non-inferiority p<0.001). The rates of MACE, death, MI and TLR at 24-month follow-up were comparable between these two devices (p>0.05, respectively). The biodegradable polymer NOYA stent was non-inferior to the FIREBIRD2 durable polymer stent with respect to the primary non-inferiority endpoint of in-stent LLL at nine-month follow-up. Clinical outcomes at 24-month follow-up were comparable between the two stents. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01226355).

Efficacy and safety of valsartan compared to enalapril in hypertensive children

This study compares efficacy and safety of valsartan with enalapril in hypertensive children aged 6-17 years. This was a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled study. After a single-blind placebo run-in period (4-28 days), patients with mean sitting systolic blood pressure (BP) (MSSBP) at least 95th percentile for age, gender, and height were randomized to receive half the assigned dose for first week, and force-titrated to full dose for 11 weeks (≥18 to <35 kg - valsartan: 80 mg, enalapril: 10 mg; ≥35 to <80 kg - valsartan: 160 mg, enalapril: 20 mg; ≥80 to ≤160 kg - valsartan: 320 mg, enalapril: 40 mg). The primary efficacy variable was changed from baseline in MSSBP to show noninferiority of valsartan to enalapril. Other efficacy variables were changed from baseline in MSDBP, SBP control rate, and 24-h ambulatory BP parameters. Of 300 randomized patients, 281 (94%) completed the study. At week 12, MSSBP reductions were similar for valsartan and enalapril (primary endpoint of noninferiority, P < 0.0001). Least square mean BP reductions from baseline of -15.4/-9.4 mmHg were observed for valsartan compared with -14.1/-8.5 mmHg for enalapril. A similar proportion of patients achieved SBP control (valsartan: 67%; enalapril: 70%). In the subset of patients who underwent ambulatory BP assessments, valsartan provided greater reductions than enalapril in mean 24-h SBP (valsartan: -9.8 mmHg, enalapril: -7.2 mmHg: P = 0.03). The overall incidence of AEs was similar (valsartan 60%, enalapril 58%) with headache, cough, and nasopharyngitis reported most frequently. Valsartan and enalapril provided comparable BP reductions and effective BP control and were well tolerated in hypertensive children aged 6-17 years.

Mesalazine in left-sided ulcerative colitis: Efficacy analyses from the PODIUM trial on maintenance of remission and mucosal healing

Background and aimLeft-sided colitis is the most prevalent subtype of ulcerative colitis, a chronic inflammatory disease of the colon. The standard of care for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis is mesalazine. The PODIUM study compared a once daily to a twice daily dosing regimen of a slow-release mesalazine (Pentasa®); here we assess the efficacy, in terms of maintenance of remission and mucosal healing, of both regimens in patients with left-sided disease. Patients and methodsEligible patients were randomised to once daily (1×2g) or twice daily (2×1g) oral treatment with mesalazine, for 12months. Disease activity was assessed clinically and endoscopically at baseline and at 12months using the Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index, without endoscopic assessment at months 4 and 8. ResultsThe study met the primary endpoint of non-inferiority in terms of remission, for once daily versus twice daily dosing, in patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis; an 8% difference was reported in the 12-month clinical and endoscopic remission rates (69% [95% CI: 59.5–76.5] and 61% [95% CI: 51.4–69.6] with once daily and twice daily dosing, respectively; p=0.310). Mucosal healing scores after 12months were 0 or 1 for 84.4% of the once daily and 78.8% of the twice daily population. Slow-release mesalazine was well tolerated in both dosing regimens, with no difference in reported adverse events. ConclusionsOnce daily slow-release mesalazine is similarly effective to the standard twice daily schedule in patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis for the maintenance of remission in mild-to-moderate disease.

A randomized, controlled, multi-center trial comparing the safety and efficacy of zotarolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo lesions in coronary arteries: Final results of the ZoMaxx II trial

Background/ObjectivesThe purpose of this prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZoMaxx™) with a paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent (Taxus™ Express2™) in patients with angina pectoris and a single native coronary artery lesion between 10–28mm in length and 2.5–3.75mm in diameter. MethodsPatients were enrolled at 75 international institutions between June 2005 and November 2006. Results1099 (1672 originally planned) patients received 557 ZoMaxx and 542 Taxus stents: cohorts were well-matched for diabetes (27% vs. 27%), reference vessel diameter (2.73±0.46mm vs. 2.74±0.45mm) and lesion length (14.8±6.7mm vs. 14.3±6.4mm). Nine month clinical and angiographic follow-up was available in 1052/1099 (96%) and 649/836 (78%) patients, respectively. The safety profiles for the two stents (myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death and/or target vessel revascularization (TVR)) were similar (ZoMaxx 8.7% vs. Taxus 6.9%, p=NS). The primary endpoint of 9-month TVR occurred more frequently after treatment with ZoMaxx (6.8%) as compared with Taxus (4.2%), therefore the primary clinical endpoint was not met. However, the 9-month in-segment late lumen loss for ZoMaxx (0.29±0.47mm) and Taxus (0.22±0.41mm, p=NS) were similar, thus satisfying the primary angiographic endpoint. Secondary endpoints of the rates of in-segment and in-stent binary restenosis were also similar (5.9% vs. 5.8%, 7.8% vs. 7.9%, respectively). ConclusionsAt 9months, the ZoMaxx stent failed to achieve the primary endpoint of non-inferiority in TVR to the Taxus stent, but safety endpoints were equal between the two stent systems.

Randomized Clinical Trial in Clostridium difficile Infection Confirms Superiority of Fidaxomicin Over Vancomycin

The usual treatments of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), metronidazole, or vancomycin (VAN), have cure rates of 80%–90% but 20%–30% of patients experience a relapse. This phase III, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) compared fidaxomicin (FDX), a first-in-class bacteriocidal macrocyclic antibiotic, with VAN in treatment of CDI. Eligible patients had acute CDI symptoms and a positive stool toxin test. Patients received oral FDX (200 mg twice daily) or oral VAN (125 mg 4 times daily) for 10 days. The primary end point was clinical cure. Secondary end points were CDI recurrence (diarrhea and positive stool toxin test within 4 weeks after treatment), and global cure (clinical cure with no recurrence). This RCT comprised 535 subjects with 524 available for safety, 509 for modified intent-to-treat (mITT), and 451 for per-protocol (PP) analyses. Europe (39%), the United States (30%), and Canada (31%) contributed subjects from 100 clinical sites. All data are given for the PP population; the mITT population was similar in all instances. The primary noninferiority end point of cure was met with 91.7% cured vs 90.6% (FDX vs VAN, respectively). Recurrence was seen in 12.8% vs 25.3% (FDX vs VAN, respectively; P = .002). Global cure was noted in 79.6% vs 65.5% (FDX vs VAN, respectively; P < .001). Concomitant antibiotics (CAs) to treat infections other than CDI were given to 59% of patients during CDI treatment. Those who received CAs had a lower cure rate (86.1% with CAs vs 98.4% without; P ≤ .001), a higher recurrence rate (23.9% with CAs vs 8.1% without; P ≤ .001), and lower global cure rate (59.8% with CAs vs 90.3% without; P ≤ .001). For those given CAs, FDX treatment was associated with lower recurrences (17.6% FDX vs 29.5% VAN; P = .027) and higher global cures (67.5% FDX vs 53.4% VAN; P = .020), but no difference in cures. FDX was well tolerated with an adverse event profile similar to that of VAN. This RCT found equivalent cure rates with FDX and VAN, but significantly fewer relapses and higher global cures. A previously reported RCT of identical design revealed the same findings. CAs had a deleterious effect on lowering cures and global cures and increasing relapses; however, FDX therapy significantly improved the relapse rate and global cures in the CA group. A total of 1100 CDI subjects in 2 RCTs have established the potential benefits of FDX in CDI treatment, even when CAs are administered.

Reduced Risk of Restenosis in Small Vessels and Reduced Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Long Lesions With the New Thin-Strut TAXUS Liberté Stent: 1-Year Results From the TAXUS ATLAS Program

The TAXUS ATLAS Small Vessel (SV) and Long Lesion (LL) multicenter studies compared the performance of the thin-strut (0.0038 inch) TAXUS Liberté 2.25-mm stent (Boston Scientific; Natick, Massachusetts) and the TAXUS Liberté 38-mm long stent (Boston Scientific; Natick, Massachusetts) with the earlier paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Express (Boston Scientific) stent that has identical polymer, drug dosage, and release kinetics but different stent geometry and thicker struts (0.0052 inch). The TAXUS Liberté stent was designed with thinner and more even strut spacing to provide more uniform drug distribution, as well as increased flexibility and conformability. Clinical benefits of the new stent design have not been evaluated. The TAXUS ATLAS SV and LL studies are nonrandomized studies comparing outcomes of the TAXUS Liberté 2.25 mm (N = 261) and TAXUS Liberté 38 mm (N = 150) stents to TAXUS Express historical control groups derived from the TAXUS IV and V trials. Inclusion/exclusion criteria for TAXUS Express and Liberté groups were similar in both studies. Each study met its primary end point of noninferiority of 9-month in-segment diameter stenosis. Furthermore, TAXUS Liberté 2.25 mm, when compared with TAXUS Express, significantly reduced the rate of both 9-month angiographic restenosis (18.5% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.0219) and 12-month target lesion revascularization (6.1% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.0039). In addition, TAXUS Liberté 38 mm significantly reduced the risk of 12-month myocardial infarction compared with TAXUS Express (1.4% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.0246). The thinner-strut TAXUS Liberté stent improved outcomes compared with the earlier TAXUS Express stent in both SVs and LLs (A Study of the TAXUS Liberté Stent for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions in Small Vessels; NCT00371748; A Study of the TAXUS Liberté Stent for the Treatment of Long De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions; NCT00371475).

Polymer-Based, Paclitaxel-Eluting TAXUS Liberté Stent in De Novo Lesions: The Pivotal TAXUS ATLAS Trial

The goal of this research was to assess non-inferiority of the next-generation TAXUS Liberté stent (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts) versus the TAXUS Express stent (Boston Scientific Corp.). The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) has shifted clinical practice towards more complex lesion subsets, prompting the need for more deliverable DES. TAXUS Liberté was designed to combine the established polymer-based, paclitaxel-elution TAXUS technology with the more advanced Liberté stent platform. The TAXUS ATLAS study is a global, prospective, single-arm trial evaluating outcomes in de novo coronary lesions visually estimated to be 10 to 28 mm in length in vessels 2.5 to 4.0 mm in diameter. The control group is an entry-criteria-matched population of TAXUS Express patients from the TAXUS IV and V trials. The primary end point is non-inferiority of TAXUS Liberté versus TAXUS Express for 9-month target vessel revascularization. Despite similar inclusion criteria, quantitative coronary angiography-determined baseline lesion characteristics were significantly more complex for TAXUS Liberté than TAXUS Express. The primary non-inferiority end point was met with the 1-sided 95% confidence bound of 2.98% less than the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 3% (p = 0.0487). Despite the treatment of more complex lesions with TAXUS Liberté, the primary end point was met, demonstrating that TAXUS Liberté is non-inferior to TAXUS Express. The successful transfer of the proven TAXUS technology to the more advanced TAXUS Liberté platform was demonstrated. (TAXUS ATLAS: TAXUS Liberté-SR Stent for the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00371709?order=1; NCT00371709).

Randomised comparison of Nobori, biolimus A9-eluting coronary stent with a Taxus(R), paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent in patients with stenosis in native coronary arteries: the Nobori 1 trial.

We studied the Nobori coronary stent coated with a bioabsorbable polymer and the anti-proliferative agent Biolimus A9 which may reduce neointimal formation. Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in up to two native coronary arteries, in 29 centres across Europe, Asia and Australia were randomly (2:1) assigned to receive the Biolimus A9 eluting stent Nobori (85 patients) or paclitaxel eluting stent Taxus(R) (35 patients). The two groups were well matched in baseline characteristics. The primary end point of non-inferiority for in-stent late loss of Nobori stent versus Taxus(R) stent, at 9 months, was reached with the values of 0.15+/-0.27 mm with Nobori stent and 0.32+/-0.33 mm with Taxus(R) stent (p=0.006). Neointimal volume obstruction was 2.2+/-6.0% and 8.9+/-9.2% for Nobori and Taxus(R) stent respectively (p=0.017). The rates of death, myocardial infarction and any target vessel revascularisation at 9 months were 0%, 4.7%, and 7.1% respectively for Nobori stent, and 0%, 8.6% and 14.3% respectively for Taxus(R) stent. Clinically-driven target lesion revascularisation rate was 0% for Nobori stent and 2.9% for Taxus(R) stent. Stent thrombosis rates at 9 months were 0% in both groups. In this trial the Nobori Biolimus A9 eluting stent proved to be safe and effective in reducing neointimal proliferation. The long term safety remains to be confirmed during the extended follow-up period of 5 years.

Dalbavancin: A review

Dalbavancin is a second-generation lipoglycopeptide bactericidal agent. Due to its once-weekly intravenous (i.v.) dosing and greater tissue penetration, dalbavancin may offer advantages in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as compared to vancomycin, the gold standard in the treatment of MRSA. Dalbavancin binds to the terminal D-alanyl-D-alanine moiety of peptidoglycan precursors in bacterial cell walls. Such binding blocks enzymes involved in the final stages of peptidoglycan synthesis and cell wall formation. Dalbavancin exhibits an elimination half-life of approximately 200 hours, allowing it to be dosed weekly. The best-studied dosing schedule for dalbavancin involves the i.v. administration of 1 g of dalbavancin followed by 500 mg one week later. Phase III clinical trials comprising more than 1,500 patients evaluated once-weekly dalbavancin in Gram-positive skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). When compared to linezolid, cefazolin or vancomycin, dalbavancin met the primary endpoint of noninferiority at two weeks following therapy. The side-effect profile of dalbavancin is mild, with headache and pyrexia being the most common adverse effects. Dalbavancin is eliminated renally and hepatically, and does not need dose adjustments in patients with renal insufficiency. Once-weekly dosing with dalbavancin gives it another advantage when compared with vancomycin, and may alleviate the need for the continued presence of indwelling catheters in some patients with SSTIs and other infections requiring prolonged doses of antibiotics. While some in vitro evidence supports dalbavancin's effectiveness against vancomycin-resistant S. aureus, the preponderance of in vivo evidence does not demonstrate its effectiveness against vancomycin-resistant S. aureus.

Randomized controlled study of tenofovir and adefovir in chronic hepatitis B virus and HIV infection: ACTG A5127

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in subjects coinfected with HIV. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) are licensed for the treatment of HIV-1 and HBV infection, respectively, but both have in vivo and in vitro activity against HBV. This study evaluated the anti-HBV activity of TDF compared to ADV in HIV/HBV-coinfected subjects. ACTG A5127 was a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of daily 10 mg of ADV versus 300 mg of TDF in subjects with HBV and HIV coinfection on stable ART, with serum HBV DNA >/= 100,000 copies/mL, and plasma HIV-1 RNA </= 10,000 copies/mL. This study closed early based on results of a prespecified interim review, as the primary noninferiority end point had been met without safety issues. Fifty-two subjects were randomized. At baseline, 73% of subjects had a plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL, 86% were HBeAg positive, 94% were 3TC resistant, median serum ALT was 52 IU/L, and 98% had compensated liver disease. The mean time-weighted average change in serum HBV DNA from baseline to week 48 (DAVG(48)) was -4.44 log(10) copies/mL for TDF and -3.21 log(10) copies/mL for ADV. There was no difference in toxicity between the 2 treatment arms, with 11 subjects (5 ADV and 6 TDF) experiencing elevations of serum ALT on treatment. In conclusion, over 48 weeks, treatment with either ADV or TDF resulted in clinically important suppression of serum HBV DNA. Both drugs are safe and efficacious for patients coinfected with HBV and HIV.

Dalbavancin: A review for dermatologists

Most complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) are caused by Staphylococcus aurens (SA) and streptococcus (SC). More and more isolates of SA and SC are resistant to methicillin (MRSA) and there are concerns that SA will become resistant to vancomycin (VRSA), the current standard of treatment. Dalbavancin (BI397) is a novel semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide that was designed to improve uon the natural glycopeptides currently available, vancomycin and teicoplanin. Phase-III clinical trials comprising more than 1,500 patients evaluating once-weekly dalbavancin in skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) associated with Gram-positive bacteria met the primary endpoint of non-inferiority in patients whose clinical response was evaluated at 2 weeks following therapy when compared to linezolid, cefazolin, or vancomycin, the three most widely administered standard-of-care agents for SSTIs. The side effect profile of dalbavancin is mild, with headache and pyrexia being the most adverse effects. Once-a-week dosing with dalbavancin may obviate the need for the continued presence of IV lines in some patients, which could translate into fewer local infections and blood stream infections and which could facilitate transfer of the patients to skilled nursing facilities. Unlike other new antibiotics, such as oritavancin and tigecycline, dalbavancin is not active against vancomycin-resistant enterococcus or VRSA. Its approval by the FDA is expected soon. The extent to which dalbavancin will supplant vancomycin and whether it will be preferred other newer agents such as linezolid.