Primary Efficacy Analysis Research Articles

Niraparib in patients with BRCA -mutated unresectable or recurrent biliary tract, pancreatic and other gastrointestinal cancers: An investigator-initiated phase 2 trial (NIR-B trial).

589 Background: It has been reported that there are BRCA1/2 -mutated patients in biliary tract, pancreatic, and other gastrointestinal cancers. Niraparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, and PARP inhibitors exert their cytotoxicity against cancer cells in the context of homologous recombination deficiency, such as BRCA mutations. Methods: Main eligibility criteria are unresectable, advanced or recurrent biliary tract cancers (BTC; cohort A), pancreatic cancers (PC; cohort B), and other gastrointestinal cancers (cohort C) with BRCA1/2 gene mutations identified by germline test or genomic profiling test with either circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or tumor tissue, refractory or intolerant to previous treatments, and adequate organ function. Patients with body weight of 77 kg or more and a platelet count of 150,000 /µL or more receive 300 mg of niraparib, and less than 77 kg or having a platelet count less than 150,000 /µL received 200 mg of niraparib, orally once daily, until disease progression or intolerable adverse events occurred. Primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) in each cohort with a threshold response rate of 10% and an expected response rate of 35%. Key secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Furthermore, pre-treatment ctDNA was collected and analyzed by Guardant360. Results: A total of 62 pts, 26 in cohort A, 26 in cohort B, and 10 in cohort C were enrolled between March 2021 and April 2023. Because one patient in cohort C did not receive protocol treatment, 61 pts were identified for primary efficacy and safety analysis. Median number of prior regimens was 1/2/2 (range, 1–2/1–2/1-6). In cohort A/B/C, the confirmed ORR was 15.4/15.4/0% [95% highest posterior density credible interval, 8.4–27.9/8.4–27.9/0.0–25.9]. The DCR, median (m) PFS, mOS were 57.7/53.8/22.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 36.9–76.6/33.4–73.4/2.8–60.0], 2.7/1.8/1.4 months (95% CI, 1.5–4.1/1.4–9.3/1.0–2.8), 7.8/9.5/7.4 months (95% CI, 5.9–9.8/3.5–NE/2.9–8.6), respectively. In the pts with BRCA mutations by Guardant360 (cohort A/B/C were 18/21/8), ORR was 11.1/19.0/0% (95% CI, 2.0-30.2/6.5–38.3/0.0–28.3). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (31.1%), anemia (27.9%), neutropenia (14.8%), nausea (36.1%), fatigue (29.5%), anorexia (24.6%). Conclusions: Although niraparib had signs of clinical activity in pts with BRCA -mutated BTC and PC, the primary endpoint was not achieved statistically. No new safety signal was observed. Alternative approaches, such as evaluation in biomarker-selected patients or in combination with other agents, may demonstrate greater clinical activity of niraparib in this setting. Clinical trial information: jRCT2011200023.

Low-dose aspirin to reduce recurrence rate in colorectal cancer patients with PI3K pathway alterations: 3-year results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

LBA125 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) affects 1.9 million individuals globally each year. Among patients with stage II-III CRC, 20-40% develop metastatic disease. Aspirin lowers the incidence of adenomas and CRC in high-risk patients. In addition, observational studies suggest that post-diagnosis aspirin treatment improves disease-free survival (DFS) in unselected populations. Furthermore, retrospective findings indicate that somatic PIK3CA mutations predict treatment response, but requires validation in randomized trials. Methods: The ALASCCA trial was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial with two parallel arms, across 33 hospitals in Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Norway. Patients with stage I-III rectal cancer or stage II-III colon cancer exhibiting somatic alterations in the PI3K signaling pathway were included. Patients were randomized to receive either 160 mg of aspirin daily or placebo, initiated within three months post-surgery and continued for three years. To detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.36 for the primary outcome of time to recurrence (TTR) assessed at 3 years, with 80% power and a two-sided alpha of 0.05, 150 patients with PIK3CA mutations in exon 9 and/or 20 (“Group A”) were required per arm. An additional 300 patients with other somatic PI3K pathway driver alterations (PIK3CA outside exon 9/20, PIK3R1, or PTEN; "Group B") were required for secondary analyses. A stratified Cox proportional hazards model was fitted for the primary efficacy analysis. Results: A total of 3508 patients were screened for somatic alterations in the PI3K pathway. Of the 2980 patients with conclusive genomic analyses, 1103 patients (37%) had an alteration in the PI3K pathway: 515 patients (17.3%) in Group A and 588 patients (19.7%) in Group B. In total, 626 patients were randomized. After three years of follow-up, the HRs for TTR comparing aspirin to placebo were 0.49 (95% CI; 0.24-0.98; p=0.044) in Group A and 0.42 (95% CI; 0.21-0.83; p=0.013) in Group B. For DFS, the HRs were 0.61 (95% CI; 0.34-1.08; p=0.091) in Group A, and 0.51 (95% CI; 0.29-0.88; p=0.017) in Group B. Three patients experienced aspirin-related severe adverse events (one GI-bleeding, one hematoma, one allergic reaction). Conclusions: Primary endpoint was met. Adjuvant treatment with 160 mg aspirin daily for three years reduced recurrence rate in CRC patients with somatic alterations in the PI3K signaling pathway. These findings could lead to immediate changes in clinical praxis for about a third of CRC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02647099 .

A prospective multi-site study to evaluate the performance and usability of an oral fluid-based HIV self-test in Canada

BackgroundBlood and oral fluid-based HIV self-tests are important for reaching the undiagnosed living with HIV. The study objectives were to evaluate the oral fluid-based OraQuick® HIV Self-Test (HIV-ST) performance in comparison to laboratory reference testing; determine if laypersons can correctly perform the HIV-ST; document if intended users can successfully interpret pre-made contrived positive, negative, and invalid results; and document if intended users can understand the key messages in the product labeling.MethodsThis prospective study enrolled consenting adult intended users of HIV self-testing from six community health centres in four Canadian provinces between June 2022 and January 2024. Positive and negative agreement was determined by comparing the results of the HIV self-tests with the results of the laboratory-based “gold standard” Abbott Alinity HIV Antigen/Antibody Combo test. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize usability self-test procedure steps.ResultsOverall, 951 participants were recruited and consented with 911 available for all analyses. With respect to sociodemographics: 84% of participants were between 18–45 years of age, 73% had at least a college education, 48% were Cis-male, 45% were employed; and 26% identified as White, 23% as African, Caribbean or Black, 5% as Indigenous [First Nations, Métis or Inuit], 33% as Asian, and 6% as LatinX. Primary efficacy analysis on the 911 who completed HIV-ST revealed a single confirmed positive participant and a negative percent agreement of 100% (880/880, 95% CI: 99.9–100%) with the comparator method. For usability determination, the average success rate for “critical” steps for completing the test was 94.1%. Approximately 97% of participants found the instructions easy to follow and 98% of participants reported they would use the test again. Of the 465 participants who interpreted the strong positive, weak positive, negative, and invalid pre-made contrived results, the average of correct interpretations ranged from 59–97%ConclusionsA licensed oral fluid-based HIV self-test in Canada can present an accurate, easy-to-use, and less invasive alternative to blood-based HIV testing. The addition of an oral-fluid self-test along with the current licensed blood-based HIV self-test could help reach the undiagnosed with HIV in Canada and positively impact HIV testing rates overall by offering individuals a choice of self-testing devices.

High versus low dose of 14 days treatment of primaquine in Plasmodium vivax infected patients in Cambodia: a randomised open-label efficacy study.

The WHO malaria treatment guidelines recommend a total dose in the range of 3·5 to 7·0 mg/kg of primaquine to eliminate Plasmodium vivax (P. vivax) hypnozoites and prevent relapses. There are however indications that for tropical P. vivax isolates, notably from Southeast Asia, the lower dose of 3·5 mg/kg is insufficient. Determining the most effective regimen to eliminate P. vivax hypnozoites is needed to achieve elimination of this malaria parasite. We conducted an open-label randomised controlled trial in Kampong Speu province, Western Cambodia. P. vivax infected patients with uncomplicated malaria, diagnosed at the community level or in health centres of the province, were offered to participate. Patients aged less than 15 years old, and pregnant or breastfeeding women were excluded. Enrolled patients were treated with a blood schizonticidal artesunate regimen of 2 mg/kg/day for 7 days. Upon enrolment, patients' glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity was determined. G6PD normal patients were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to receive either (i) 3·5 mg/kg (low dose as 0·25 mg/kg/day) or (ii) 7·0 mg/kg (high dose as 0·5 mg/kg/day) of primaquine over 14 days or (iii) no primaquine as comparator arm. G6PD deficient patients were assigned to the no-primaquine comparator arm. Randomisation was done by blocks of 5 using sealed envelopes. Upon enrolment, patients were relocated to the study site in Aoral town where no malaria transmission occurs to ensure that they were not reinfected during their 90-day follow-up. After 90 days of relocation, G6PD normal patients in the no-primaquine arm were provided 3·5 mg/kg for 14 days of primaquine to be taken unsupervised. At day 90, all the patients returned home and they were further followed monthly for three months until day 180. The primary outcome was the treatment failure rate defined as the proportion of patients with at least one P. vivax recurrence within 90 days of relocated follow-up. All patients that completed treatment and complied with relocation without interruption before any recurrence was detected were included in the primary efficacy analysis. All patients enrolled and assigned to an intervention arm were included in the safety analysis. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04706130). Between Nov 10, 2021, and Feb 10, 2024, a total of 160 patients were enrolled and 156 were allocated to one of the three study arms. Of these, 37 G6PD deficient patients were assigned to the no primaquine arm and 119 G6PD normal patients were randomised: 24 in the no primaquine arm, 49 in the primaquine 3·5 mg/kg arm, and 46 in the primaquine 7·0 mg/kg arm. The proportion of participants with at least one P. vivax recurrence within 90 days in the no primaquine arm was 81·4% (95% CI 69·6-89·2). The proportion of participants with recurrence was higher in the low dose primaquine arm (24·4%, 95% CI 14·2-38·7) compared to the high primaquine arm (4·7%, 95% CI 0·8-15·5, p=0·0141) resulting in a hazard ratio of high dose primaquine compared to low dose of 0·17 (95% CI 0·04-0·79, p=0·0229). Both primaquine arms were well tolerated. Not providing primaquine to patients led to a considerable rate of P. vivax recurrence. The risk of P. vivax recurrence was 5·9 times lower for the 7·0 mg/kg of primaquine treatment compared to 3·5 mg/kg. Tolerability and safety of both primaquine regimens in G6PD normal individuals was comparable. Policy makers in Cambodia and most likely in other Southeast Asian countries should endorse the 7·0 mg/kg of primaquine regimen to reduce the risk of P. vivax relapses. National Institutes of Health (R01AI146590).

Efficacy and Safety of Denileukin Diftitox-Cxdl, an Improved Purity Formulation of Denileukin Diftitox, in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma.

Denileukin diftitox (DD)-cxdl is a fusion protein comprising diphtheria toxin fragments A and B and human interleukin-2. This phase III, multicenter, open-label, single-arm registrational trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of DD-cxdl in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). In the main study, which followed a dose-finding lead-in, DD-cxdl was administered intravenously daily (5 days; 9 µg/kg/d once daily) every 21 days for up to eight cycles. Patients in the primary efficacy analysis set (PEAS) were required to have stage IA-IIIB CTCL (mycosis fungoides and/or Sézary syndrome) and at least ≥one previous systemic therapy. The primary efficacy end point was objective response rate (ORR) using the Global Response Score. Secondary end points were duration of response (DOR), time to response (TTR), skin tumor burden, and safety and tolerability. The PEAS included 69 patients (median age, 64.0 years). The ORR was 36.2% (95% CI, 25.0 to 48.7), including 8.7% with complete response. The median DOR was 8.9 months (95% CI, 5.0 to not estimable), and the median (Q1-Q3) TTR was 1.4 (0.7-2.1) months. A total of 84.4% of patients showed decreased skin tumor burden, with 48.4% showing a ≥50% decrease. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of special interest, most of which were grade 1 or 2, included infusion reaction (73.9%), hypersensitivity (68.1%), hepatotoxicity (36.2%), and capillary leak syndrome (20.3% [grade ≥3, 5.8%]). Other common TEAEs were nausea (43.5%) and fatigue (31.9%). Efficacy and safety results show that DD-cxdl would potentially fulfill a serious, unmet medical need for patients with R/R CTCL.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Use in Third Molar Impaction Surgery: INNOVATE Study.

The analgesic efficacy and safety of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) in third molar extraction was evaluated in this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of subjects undergoing bilateral third molar extraction. Subjects were randomized 2: 1 to infiltration with LB (133 mg/10 mL) or placebo, and received opioid rescue medication as needed. Primary efficacy measure was cumulative area under the curve (AUC) of numeric rating scale (NRS) pain severity scores through 48 hours (AUC of NRS0-48) postsurgery. Other measures included AUC of NRS0-24, AUC of NRS0-72, and AUC of NRS0-96, and incidence of adverse events. There were 150 subjects in the primary efficacy population (n = 99 LB, n = 51 placebo) and 89 in the per-protocol population (n = 59 LB, n = 30 placebo). Least-squares mean for AUC of NRS0-48 was 172.3 LB versus 194.7 placebo (P = .227) in the primary efficacy population and 120.8 LB versus 183.3 placebo (P = .023) in the per-protocol population. At all time points, between-group differences in AUC of NRS scores were significant in the per-protocol population (LB lower than placebo, P < .05) but not in the primary efficacy population. The adverse event profile was similar between groups. LB produced significantly lower cumulative pain scores versus placebo at all time points in the per-protocol analysis but not in the primary efficacy analysis because of protocol violations. This study indicates significant improvement in pain scores in the third molar model, but because of extensive protocol violations additional studies are warranted to demonstrate effectiveness.

Twice-Yearly Lenacapavir for HIV Prevention in Men and Gender-Diverse Persons.

Twice-yearly subcutaneous lenacapavir has been shown to be efficacious for prevention of HIV infection in cisgender women. The efficacy of lenacapavir for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in cisgender men, transgender women, transgender men, and gender-nonbinary persons is unclear. In this phase 3, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled trial, we randomly assigned participants in a 2:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous lenacapavir every 26 weeks or daily oral emtricitabine-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF). The primary efficacy analysis compared the incidence of HIV infection in the lenacapavir group with the background HIV incidence in the screened population. The secondary efficacy analysis compared the incidence of HIV infection in the lenacapavir group with that in the F/TDF group. Among 3265 participants who were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, HIV infections occurred in 2 participants in the lenacapavir group (0.10 per 100 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01 to 0.37) and in 9 participants in the F/TDF group (0.93 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.77). The background HIV incidence in the screened population (4634 participants) was 2.37 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 1.65 to 3.42). The incidence of HIV infection in the lenacapavir group was significantly lower than both the background incidence (incidence rate ratio, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.18; P<0.001) and the incidence in the F/TDF group (incidence rate ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.51; P = 0.002). No safety concerns were identified. A total of 26 of 2183 participants (1.2%) in the lenacapavir group and 3 of 1088 (0.3%) in the F/TDF group discontinued the trial regimen because of injection-site reactions. The HIV incidence with twice-yearly lenacapavir was significantly lower than the background incidence and the incidence with F/TDF. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; PURPOSE 2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04925752.).

Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma.

Patients receiving standard treatment for chronic subdural hematoma have a high risk of treatment failure. The effect of adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization on the risk of treatment failure in this population remains unknown. We randomly assigned patients with symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma to undergo middle meningeal artery embolization as an adjunct to standard treatment (embolization group) or to receive standard treatment alone (control group). Either surgical or nonsurgical standard treatment had been chosen for each patient before randomization. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of the following events: recurrent or residual chronic subdural hematoma (measuring >10 mm) at 180 days; reoperation or surgical rescue within 180 days; or major disabling stroke, myocardial infarction, or death from neurologic causes within 180 days. The primary safety outcome was a composite of major disabling stroke or death from any cause within 30 days. Among 310 enrolled patients, 149 were randomly assigned to the embolization group and 161 to the control group; 189 patients were to receive surgical standard treatment and 121 nonsurgical standard treatment. The mean age of the patients was 73 years, and 70% were men. In the primary efficacy analysis, a primary-outcome event occurred in 19 of 120 patients (16%) in the embolization group, as compared with 47 of 129 patients (36%) in the control group (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.66; P = 0.001). In the primary safety analysis, 4 of 144 patients (3%) in the embolization group and 5 of 166 patients (3%) in the control group either had a major disabling stroke or died within 30 days. Through 180 days, 12 patients (8%) in the embolization group and 9 patients (5%) in the control group had died, with death from neurologic causes occurring in 1 patient (1%) in the embolization group and in 3 patients (2%) in the control group. Among patients with symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma, adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization resulted in a lower risk of treatment failure than standard treatment alone, without resulting in an increased incidence of disabling stroke or death in the short term. Further study of longer-term safety outcomes is warranted. (Funded by Balt USA; STEM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04410146.).

Stepped-Care Web-Based Parent Support Following Congenital Heart Disease: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Early neurodevelopmental risks, compounded with traumatic medical experiences, contribute to emotional and behavioral challenges in as many as 1 in 2 children with congenital heart disease (CHD). Parents report a strong need for supports; yet, there remains a lack of accessible, evidence-based behavioral interventions available for children with CHD and their families. I-InTERACT-North is a web-based stepped-care mental health program designed to support family well-being and reduce behavioral concerns through positive parenting for children with early medical complexity. In previous pilot studies, the program was effective in increasing positive parenting skills and decreasing child behavior problems, with high parent-reported acceptability. This paper presents the protocol for the first randomized study of stepped-care parent support for families of children with CHD. This study will involve a single-site, 2-arm, single-blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate (1) the feasibility and acceptability of a web-based stepped-care parent support program (I-InTERACT-North) and (2) the effectiveness of the program in enhancing positive parenting skills and reducing behavioral concerns among families of children with CHD. Families will be randomized (1:1) to either receive treatment or continue with care as usual for 12 months. Randomization will be stratified by child's sex assigned at birth and baseline parent-reported child behavior intensity. Primary outcomes include positive parenting skills and child behavior at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Secondary outcomes include parental mental health, quality of life, service usage, and feasibility including program reach and adherence. A sample size of 244 families will provide >95% power to detect an effect size of d=0.64. Based on attrition data from pilot studies, a target of 382 families will be enrolled. Parent reports of acceptability, adoption, and suggested adaptability of the program will be examined using cross-case thematic analyses. Primary efficacy analysis will be conducted using an intent-to-treat approach. Generalized estimating equations will be used to examine changes in positive parenting. Child behavior, quality of life, and parent mental health will be tested with repeated-measures analyses. Additional sensitivity and replication analyses will also be carried out. Recruitment began in February 2024, and recruitment and follow-up will continue until January 2029. We anticipate results in late 2029. This study aims to test the effectiveness of I-InTERACT-North web-based stepped-care parent support in improving positive parenting skills and reducing child behavior problems in families of children with CHD compared with a care as usual control group. Results will inform future clinical implementation and expansion of this program among families of children with early medical conditions. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06075251; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06075251. DERR1-10.2196/64216.

Mepolizumab in CRSwNP/ECRS and NP: the phase III randomised MERIT trial in Japan, China, and Russia.

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 52-week Phase III study (MERIT; NCT04607005) assessed mepolizumab efficacy and safety in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP)/eosinophilic CRS (ECRS) in Japan, Russia, and China, for which data are limited. Eligible patients (enrolled at 60 centres) had blood eosinophil count >2%, endoscopic bilateral NP score ≥5, nasal obstruction visual analogue scale (VAS) score >5, ≥2 sinonasal symptoms, and either previous sinus surgery or systemic corticosteroid use/intolerance. Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneously or placebo every 4 weeks, plus standard of care. Co-primary endpoints: change from baseline in total endoscopic NP score (ENPS) (Week 52) and nasal obstruction VAS score (Weeks 49-52). Post hoc analyses conducted in a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population excluded patients from two study sites, related to Good Clinical Practice violations by the Site Management Organisation overseeing these sites. These were considered the primary efficacy analyses. In the mITT population, mepolizumab (n=80) versus placebo (n=83) significantly improved nasal obstruction VAS score from baseline to Week 49-52 and was associated with a trend of total ENPS improvements at Week 52. Mepolizumab/placebo on-treatment adverse events (AEs) occurred in 68/84 and 65/85 patients in the safety population (treatment-related AEs: 2/84 and 5/85, respectively), and on-treatment serious AEs in 0/84 and 4/85 patients, respectively (no fatalities reported). Mepolizumab was effective and well-tolerated in patients with CRSwNP/ECRS from Japan, Russia, and China.

Safety and efficacy of rodatristat ethyl for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (ELEVATE-2): a dose-ranging, randomised, multicentre, phase 2b trial

The role of serotonin in pulmonary arterial hypertension has been extensively studied in recent decades, with preclinical data strongly indicating involvement in disease pathogenesis; however, clinical studies have yielded mixed results. ELEVATE-2 was a phase 2b dose-ranging, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial investigating rodatristat ethyl as a treatment for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The study was conducted at 64 sites across 16 countries in Europe and North America. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, had pulmonary arterial hypertension with WHO functional class II or III symptom severity, and had received a stable dose and regimen of one or more pulmonary arterial hypertension treatments for at least 12 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive two placebo tablets, one placebo and one rodatristat ethyl 300 mg tablet, or two rodatristat ethyl 300 mg tablets twice daily using an interactive response system. Participants, investigators, site personnel, and sponsors were masked to treatment allocation. Participants who completed the 24 week treatment period were invited to continue in an open-label extension. The primary endpoint was percent change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) from baseline to week 24. Primary efficacy analyses were conducted on the intention-to-treat population and analyses of harms were conducted in the safety population, which included all patients who received any amount of the study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04712669, and is now complete. Between March 18, 2021 and Dec 13, 2022, 108 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned. 36 participants received placebo, 36 received rodatristat ethyl 300 mg, and 36 received rodatristat ethyl 600 mg twice daily. Overall, 85 (79%) of participants were female and 23 (21%) were male. The mean age was 52·8 years (SD 14·7) in the full analysis set. In the open-label extension phase, 62 (82%) of participants were female and 14 (18%) were male, and the mean age was 52·8 years (SD 14·7); this phase was terminated following sponsor review of unmasked main study results. Least-squares mean percent change in PVR from baseline to week 24 favoured placebo and was 5·8% (SE 18·1) for the placebo group, 63·1% (18·5) for the rodatristat ethyl 300 mg group, and 64·2% (18·0) for the rodatristat ethyl 600 mg group. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were reported for 29 (81%) patients in the placebo group, 33 (92%) patients in the rodatristat ethyl 300 mg group, and all 36 (100%) patients in the rodatristat ethyl 600 mg group. TEAE leading to study discontinuation were reported for three (8%) patients in the placebo group, four (11%) patients in the rodatristat ethyl 300 mg group, and four (11%) in the rodatristat ethyl 600 mg group. There was one (3%) TEAE leading to death in the rodatristat ethyl 300 mg group. Our results indicate that reducing peripheral serotonin concentrations via rodatristat ethyl has a negative effect on pulmonary haemodynamics and cardiac function in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. This finding suggests that manipulating this pathway might not be a suitable option for pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy. Enzyvant Therapeutics (now Sumitomo Pharma America).

Datopotamab-deruxtecan in early-stage breast cancer: the sequential multiple assignment randomized I-SPY2.2 phase 2 trial.

Among the goals of patient-centric care are the advancement of effective personalized treatment, while minimizing toxicity. The phase 2 I-SPY2.2 trial uses a neoadjuvant sequential therapy approach in breast cancer to further these goals, testing promising new agents while optimizing individual outcomes. Here we tested datopotamab-deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in the I-SPY2.2 trial for patients with high-risk stage 2/3 breast cancer. I-SPY2.2 uses a sequential multiple assignment randomization trial design that includes three sequential blocks of biologically targeted neoadjuvant treatment: the experimental agent(s) (block A), a taxane-based regimen tailored to the tumor subtype (block B) and doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (block C). Patients are randomized into arms consisting of different investigational block A treatments. Algorithms based on magnetic resonance imaging and core biopsy guide treatment redirection after each block, including the option of early surgical resection in patients predicted to have a high likelihood of pathological complete response, the primary endpoint. There are two primary efficacy analyses: after block A and across all blocks for the six prespecified breast cancer subtypes (defined by clinical hormone receptor/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and/or the response-predictive subtypes). We report results of 103 patients treated with Dato-DXd. While Dato-DXd did not meet the prespecified threshold for success (graduation) after block A in any subtype, the treatment strategy across all blocks graduated in the hormone receptor-negative HER2-Immune-DNA repair deficiency- subtype with an estimated pathological complete response rate of 41%. No new toxicities were observed, with stomatitis and ocular events occurring at low grades. Dato-DXd was particularly active in the hormone receptor-negative/HER2-Immune-DNA repair deficiency- signature, warranting further investigation, and was safe in other subtypes in patients who followed the treatment strategy. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01042379 .

Datopotamab-deruxtecan plus durvalumab in early-stage breast cancer: the sequential multiple assignment randomized I-SPY2.2 phase 2 trial.

Sequential adaptive trial designs can help accomplish the goals of personalized medicine, optimizing outcomes and avoiding unnecessary toxicity. Here we describe the results of incorporating a promising antibody-drug conjugate, datopotamab-deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in combination with programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitor, durvalumab, as the first sequence of therapy in the I-SPY2.2 phase 2 neoadjuvant sequential multiple assignment randomization trial for high-risk stage 2/3 breast cancer. The trial includes three blocks of treatment, with initial randomization to different experimental agent(s) (block A), followed by a taxane-based regimen tailored to tumor subtype (block B), followed by doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (block C). Subtype-specific algorithms based on magnetic resonance imaging volume change and core biopsy guide treatment redirection after each block, including the option of early surgical resection in patients predicted to have a high likelihood of pathologic complete response, which is the primary endpoint assessed when resection occurs. There are two primary efficacy analyses: after block A and across all blocks for six prespecified HER2-negative subtypes (defined by hormone receptor status and/or response-predictive subtypes). In total, 106 patients were treated with Dato-DXd/durvalumab in block A. In the immune-positive subtype, Dato-DXd/durvalumab exceeded the prespecified threshold for success (graduated) after block A; and across all blocks, pathologic complete response rates were equivalent to the rate expected for the standard of care (79%), but 54% achieved that result after Dato-DXd/durvalumab alone (block A) and 92% without doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (after blocks A + B). The treatment strategy across all blocks graduated in the hormone-negative/immune-negative subtype. No new toxicities were observed. Stomatitis was the most common side effect in block A. No patients receiving block A treatment alone had adrenal insufficiency. Dato-DXd/durvalumab is a promising therapy combination that can eliminate standard chemotherapy in many patients, particularly the immune-positive subtype.ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01042379 .

Localized Nicardipine Release Implants for Prevention of Vasospasm After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Cerebral vasospasm largely contributes to a devastating outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), with limited therapeutic options. To investigate the safety and efficacy of localized nicardipine release implants positioned around the basal cerebral vasculature at risk for developing proximal vasospasm after aSAH. This single-masked randomized clinical trial with a 52-week follow-up was performed between April 5, 2020, and January 23, 2023, at 6 academic neurovascular centers in Germany and Austria. Consecutive patients with World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade 3 or 4 aSAH due to a ruptured anterior circulation aneurysm requiring microsurgical aneurysm repair participated. During aneurysm repair, patients were randomized 1:1 to intraoperatively receive 10 implants at 4 mg of nicardipine each plus standard of care (implant group) or aneurysm repair alone plus standard of care (control group). The primary end point was the incidence of moderate to severe cerebral angiographic vasospasm (aVS) between days 7 and 9 after aneurysm rupture as determined by digital subtraction angiography. Of 41 patients, 20 were randomized to the control group (mean [SD] age, 54.9 [9.1] years; 17 female [85%]) and 21 to the implant group (mean [SD] age, 53.6 [11.9] years; 14 female [67%]). A total of 39 patients were included in the primary efficacy analysis. In the control group, 11 of 19 patients (58%) developed moderate or severe aVS compared with 4 of 20 patients (20%) in the implant group (P = .02). This outcome was paralleled by a lower clinical need for vasospasm rescue therapy in the implant group (2 of 20 patients [10%]) compared with the control group (11 of 19 patients [58%]; P = .002). Between days 13 and 15 after aneurysm rupture, new cerebral infarcts were noted in 6 of 19 patients (32%) in the control group and in 2 of 20 patients (10%) in the implant group (P = .13). At 52 weeks, favorable outcomes were noted in 12 of 18 patients (67%) in the control group and 16 of 19 patients (84%) in the implant group (P = .27). The adverse event rate did not differ between groups. These findings show that placing nicardipine release implants during microsurgical aneurysm repair can provide safe and effective prevention of moderate to severe aVS after aSAH. A phase 3 clinical trial to investigate the effect of nicardipine implants on clinical outcome may be warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04269408.

Leadless Ultrasound-Based Cardiac Resynchronization System in Heart Failure

Approximately 40% of patients with heart failure (HF) who are eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) either fail to respond or are untreatable due to anatomical constraints. To assess the safety and efficacy of a novel, leadless, left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing system for patients at high risk for a CRT upgrade or whose coronary sinus (CS) lead placement/pacing with a conventional CRT system failed. The SOLVE-CRT study was a prospective multicenter trial enrolling January 2018 through July 2022, with follow-up at 6 months. Data were analyzed from January 17, 2018, through February 15, 2023. The trial combined data from an initial randomized, double-blind study (n = 108) and a subsequent single-arm part (n = 75). It took place at 36 centers across Australia, Europe, and the US. Participants were nonresponders, previously untreatable (PU), or high-risk upgrades (HRU). All participants contributed to the safety analysis. The primary efficacy analysis (n = 100) included 75 PU-HRU patients from the single-arm part and 25 PU-HRU patients from the randomized treatment arm. Patients were implanted with the WiSE CRT System (EBR Systems) consisting of a leadless LV endocardial pacing electrode stimulated with ultrasound energy delivered by a subcutaneously implanted transmitter and battery. The primary safety end point was freedom from type I complications. The primary efficacy end point was a reduction in mean LV end systolic volume (LVESV). The study included 183 participants; mean age was 68.1 (SD, 10.3) years and 141 were male (77%). The trial was terminated at an interim analysis for meeting prespecified stopping criteria. In the safety population, patients were either New York Heart Association Class II (34.6%) or III (65.4%). The primary efficacy end point was met with a 16.4% (95% CI, -21.0% to -11.7%) reduction in mean LVESV (P = .003). The primary safety end point was met with an 80.9% rate of freedom from type I complications (P < .001), which included 12 study device system events (6.6%), 5 vascular events (2.7%), 3 strokes (1.6%), and 7 cardiac perforations which mostly occurred early in the study (3.8%). The SOLVE-CRT study has demonstrated that leadless LV endocardial pacing with the WiSE CRT system is associated with a reduction in LVESV in patients with HF. This novel system may represent an alternative to conventional CRT implants in some HF patient populations. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0292203.

Efficacy of soothing cream gel in the range of motion and chronic pain at the shoulder and elbow: protocol of a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

IntroductionUpper limb problems have a significant impact on the global population leading to pain and restricted joint mobility, ultimately impacting their quality of life. Traditional treatments, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory...

O-280 Vaginal microbiota transplant (VMT) without antibiotic pretreatment reveals changes in vaginal microbiota and immune profile in women with asymptomatic dysbiosis – a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Abstract Study question Investigate the safety of VMT and explore its effects on the vaginal microbiomes and local inflammation in healthy, asymptomatic volunteer women screened for vaginal dysbiosis Summary answer We demonstrate safety and engraftment of donor bacteria in 50% of recipients, and a distinct shift in local inflammatory markers following resolution of vaginal dysbiosis What is known already Dominance by a subset of vaginal Lactobacillus species is considered healthy. Dysbiosis characterized by high abundance of anaerobic species is observed in around one third of women, and affects fertility, pregnancy outcomes, risk of STIs and UTIs, and potentially cancer treatment. Current use of antibiotics is often insufficient with high recurrence rates and potentially antibiotic resistance. There is a clear need for alternatives and recently it was shown that VMT following antibiotic treatment resulted in long-lasting improvements in symptoms of bacterial vaginosis in four out of five patients, but RCTs without the use of antibiotics remain to be reported. Study design, size, duration We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blinded trial in 34 recipients randomized in an active:placebo 3:1 ratio. Subjects in the active arm received VMTs from donor cervicovaginal secretions (CVS) while placebo participants received saline. All recipients were dosed on 3 consecutive days with active arm recipients receiving all 3 VMTs originating from the same donor. All recipients were followed for safety and efficacy assessments for 6 menstrual cycles after dosing. Participants/materials, setting, methods Donors: CVS was obtained from healthy subjects screened to be negative for a broad panel of infections and having lactobacilli-dominant vaginal microbiomes. RCT: Healthy, asymptomatic women aged 18 to 45 whose vaginal microbiome had combined lactobacilli relative abundance &amp;lt;10% and combined relative abundance of dysbiosis-associated bacteria &amp;gt;20% were included. VMTs were applied vaginally on three consecutive days. Follow-up visits were performed 1 week after the last VMT and then once every cycle for 6 cycles. Main results and the role of chance Here, we report the successful implementation of a donor program to obtain screened, frozen, and banked donor CVS to be used in the first VMT intervention RCT. In the ITT population, the primary efficacy analysis showed statistically significant increase from baseline in relative abundance of vaginal lactobacilli to follow-up timepoints 1 week and 3 cycles post intervention in the active arm, while no statistical significant change was observed in the placebo arm at any follow-up timepoint. Also, time-resolved metagenomic analysis showed that 50% of women treated with VMT displayed a shift of the vaginal microbiome toward the Lactobacillus-dominated donor CVS sample, confirmed with strain-level engraftment analysis. We observed no serious treatment-associated adverse events and the intervention was well tolerated. Further, the successful “twinning” of the recipient to match the donor microbiome post-VMT also led to a dramatic shift toward an anti-inflammatory environment based on transcriptomic analysis of CVS. Limitations, reasons for caution Recipients were asymptomatic and mainly Caucasian, which limits generalizability to other ethnicities and the symptomatic spectrum of vaginal dysbiosis. Due to COVID-19-related recruitment issues, the cohort size ended below the targeted number of n = 40. Future studies will aim to identify factors driving engraftment and its impact on clinical outcomes. Wider implications of the findings Vaginal microbial interventions including VMT have great potential as the first therapeutic intervention that provides effective and long-term vaginal microbiota restoration, positively impacting a wide variety of diseases and conditions affecting the female reproductive tract. Trial registration number NCT05114031

Cumulative Benefit Over 52Weeks With Deucravacitinib Versus Apremilast in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: POETYK PSO-1 Post Hoc Analysis.

Deucravacitinib demonstrated superior efficacy to apremilast in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in the POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 clinical trials. In the study reported here, we aimed to determine the overall 52-week cumulative clinical benefit of treatment initiated with deucravacitinib versus apremilast and to compare the 52-week cumulative benefit of initiating and staying on deucravacitinib versus initiating apremilast and continuing or switching to deucravacitinib at week 24 of treatment. This post hoc analysis of POETYK PSO-1 data (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03624127) determined the cumulative clinical benefit of deucravacitinib 6mg once daily and apremilast 30mg twice daily in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Patients treated with apremilast who did not achieve a 50% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) at week 24 were switched to deucravacitinib. The cumulative clinical benefit of deucravacitinib versus apremilast over 52weeks was based on cumulative measures of ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in PASI score (PASI 75) and the proportion of patients with a static Physician Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (sPGA 0/1). Ratios of area under the curve estimates between treatments were calculated and compared based on analysis of covariance regression models. Patients initiating deucravacitinib (N = 332) had a greater cumulative benefit as measured by the PASI 75 and sPGA 0/1 than those initiating apremilast (N = 168). Over 52weeks, those initiating deucravacitinib experienced 50% more benefit as measured by PASI 75 and 58% more benefit as measured by sPGA 0/1 than those initiating apremilast. Results were consistent with the primary analysis when patients were classified by prior systemic and prior biologic therapy exposure. Results from this analysis corroborate the primary efficacy analysis supporting the use of deucravacitinib compared with apremilast for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, regardless of prior systemic or biologic use.

Minimally invasive surgeries for spontaneous hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (MISICH): a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BackgroundIntracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a common stroke type with high morbidity and mortality. There are mainly three surgical methods for treating ICH. Unfortunately, thus far, no specific surgical method has been proven to be the most effective. We carried out this study to investigate whether minimally invasive surgeries with endoscopic surgery or stereotactic aspiration (frameless navigated aspiration) will improve functional outcomes in patients with supratentorial ICH compared with small-bone flap craniotomy.MethodsIn this parallel-group multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted at 16 centers, patients with supratentorial hypertensive ICH were randomized to receive endoscopic surgery, stereotactic aspiration, or craniotomy at a 1:1:1 ratio from July 2016 to June 2022. The follow-up duration was 6 months. Patients were randomized to receive endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration, or small-bone flap craniotomy. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0–2 at the 6-month follow-up.ResultsA total of 733 patients were randomly allocated to three groups: 243 to the endoscopy group, 247 to the aspiration group, and 243 to the craniotomy group. Finally, 721 patients (239 in the endoscopy group, 246 in the aspiration group, and 236 in the craniotomy group) received treatment and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Primary efficacy analysis revealed that 73 of 219 (33.3%) in the endoscopy group, 72 of 220 (32.7%) in the aspiration group, and 47 of 212 (22.2%) in the craniotomy group achieved favorable functional outcome at the 6-month follow-up (P = .017). We got similar results in subgroup analysis of deep hemorrhages, while in lobar hemorrhages the prognostic outcome was similar among three groups. Old age, deep hematoma location, large hematoma volume, low preoperative GCS score, craniotomy, and intracranial infection were associated with greater odds of unfavorable outcomes. The mean hospitalization expenses were ¥92,420 in the endoscopy group, ¥77,351 in the aspiration group, and ¥100,947 in the craniotomy group (P = .000).ConclusionsCompared with small bone flap craniotomy, endoscopic surgery and stereotactic aspiration improved the long-term outcome of hypertensive ICH, especially deep hemorrhages.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02811614.

A phase III randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of suvemcitug combined with chemotherapy for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (SCORES).

LBA5516 Background: Suvemcitug is a new-generation recombinant humanized anti-VEGF rabbit monoclonal antibody. In the previous P1b study, Suvemcitug demonstrated its favorable safety profile and efficacy signals when combo with chemotherapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC). SCORES is the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial to confirm the efficacy of Suvemcitug combo with chemo in PROC, whether or not previously received antiangiogenic agents or PARP inhibitors. Methods: Eligible patients had progressed during platinum-based therapy or within 6 months after ≥4 cycles of platinum-based therapy with at least one measurable lesion. After the investigators chose chemotherapy (CT) (weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/ m2 d1, 8, 15 &amp; 22 q4w, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 d1 q4w or topotecan 4 mg/m2 d1, 8 &amp; 15 q4w), patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to either Suvemcitug (1.5 mg/kg q2w) or placebo combine with CT until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent review committee (BIRC) according to the RECIST 1.1. Key secondary end point is the overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 421 patients were enrolled between June 2021 and June 2023 in China. As the data cut off of the primary efficacy analysis (8 December 2023), 197 PFS events (70.1%) in Suvemcitug arm and 111 PFS events (79.3%) in placebo arm had occurred with the median follow-up of 14.36 and 14.26 months, respectively. The median PFS by BIRC was 5.49 months in Suvemcitug arm versus 2.73 months in placebo arm (hazard ratio[HR] 0.46, p&lt;0.0001). OS data are immature. 42.7% and 50.7% of patients are deceased in Suvemcitug arm or placebo arm respectively, and there is a trend of OS benefit trend: median OS 16.07 months vs. 14.88 months, HR 0.79, p=0.1244. Efficacy results are summarized below. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in all patients in Suvemcitug arm, with the most common being neutrophil count decreased, white blood cell count decreased and platelet count decreased. No Suvemcitug-related grade 5 TEAE occurred. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first double-blinded phase III study demonstrated promising antitumor activity of anti-angiogenic agent in patients with PROC. The improvement in PFS, ORR and DCR gained by adding Suvemcitug to single-agent CT was observed with no new safety concern. Clinical trial information: NCT04908787 . [Table: see text]