Primary Care Patients Research Articles

Relationship between visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and depressive mood in Korean primary care patients

BackgroundHigh blood pressure variability (BPV) increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and may be better prognostic factor than blood pressure. Depressive mood is a common symptom among patients visiting primary care. This study aimed to investigate the association between depressive mood and high BPV among Korean primary care patients.MethodsThe Family Cohort Study in Primary Care (FACTS), conducted from April 2009 to November 2017, utilized a prospective cohort of Korean primary care patients, with a median follow-up period of 7.25 years. Depressive mood was assessed as a score of 21 points or more on the Korean-type Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale. BP was measured at the initial visit and first and second follow-up visit. Visit-to visit SBP variability was analyzed using four metrics: intra-individual standard deviation, coefficient of variation, variation independent of mean, and average real variability. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association of high BPV with depressive mood and other variables.ResultsAmong 371 participants, 43 (11.6%) had depressive mood based on depression scores. Older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–1.07) were associated with high SBP variability regardless of taking antihypertensive medication. Among participants taking antihypertensive medication, those with depressive mood had twice the risk of high SBP variability compared with those who did not (OR: 2.95, 95% CI: 1.06–8.20).ConclusionsDepressive mood was associated with high visit-to-visit SBP variability in primary care patients taking antihypertensive medication, potentially indicating increased cardiovascular risk. Primary care physicians should therefore closely monitor BPV in patients with depressive symptoms and provide appropriate interventions.

Access to primary health care: perspectives of primary care physicians and community stakeholders

BackgroundAction on the social determinants of health is important to strengthen primary health care and promote access among underserved populations. We report on findings from stakeholder consultations undertaken at one of the Canadian sites of the Innovative Models Promoting Access-to-Care Transformation (IMPACT) program, as part of the development of a best practice intervention to improve access to primary health care. The overarching objective of this qualitative study was to understand the processes, barriers, and facilitators to connect patients to health enabling community resources (HERs) to inform a patient navigation model situated in primary care.MethodsFocus groups and interviews were conducted with primary care physicians, and community health and social service providers to understand their experiences in supporting patients in reaching HERs. Current gaps in access to primary health care and the potential of patient navigation were also explored. We applied Levesque et al., (2013) access framework to code the data and four themes emerged: (1) Approachability and Ability to Perceive, (2) Acceptability and Ability to Seek, (3) Availability and Accommodation, and Ability to Reach, and (4) Appropriateness.ResultsDeterminants of access included patient and provider awareness of HERs, the nature of the patient-provider relationship, funding of HERs, integration of primary and community care services, and continuity of information. Participants’ perspectives about the potential scope and role of a patient navigator provided valuable insight for the development of the Access to Resources in the Community (ARC) navigation model and how it could be embedded in a primary care setting.ConclusionAdditional consultation with key stakeholders in the health region is needed to gain a broader understanding of the challenges in caring for primary care patients with social barriers and how to support them in accessing community-based primary health care to inform the design of the ARC intervention.

An Electronic Health Record Model for Predicting Risk of Hepatic Fibrosis in Primary Care Patients.

One challenge for primary care providers caring for patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is to identify those at the highest risk for clinically significant liver disease. To derive a risk stratification tool using variables from structured electronic health record (EHR) data for use in populations which are disproportionately affected with obesity and diabetes. We used data from 344 participants who underwent Fibroscan examination to measure liver fat and liver stiffness measurement [LSM]. Using two approaches, multivariable logistic regression and random forest classification, we assessed risk factors for any hepatic fibrosis (LSM > 7kPa) and significant hepatic fibrosis (> 8kPa). Possible predictors included data from the EHR for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, FIB-4, body mass index (BMI), LDL, HDL, and triglycerides. Of 344 patients (56.4% women), 34 had any hepatic fibrosis, and 15 significant hepatic fibrosis. Three variables (BMI, FIB-4, diabetes) were identified from both approaches. When we used variable cut-offs defined by Youden's index, the final model predicting any hepatic fibrosis had an AUC of 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.84), NPV of 91.5% and PPV of 40.0%. The final model with variable categories based on standard clinical thresholds (i.e., BMI ≥ 30kg/m2; FIB-4 ≥ 1.45) had lower discriminatory ability (AUC 0.65), but higher PPV (50.0%) and similar NPV (91.3%). We observed similar findings for predicting significant hepatic fibrosis. Our results demonstrate that standard thresholds for clinical risk factors/biomarkers may need to be modified for greater discriminatory ability among populations with high prevalence of obesity and diabetes.

Current utility of first-line FT4 and TSH in screening for central hypothyroidism.

Thyroid testing strategies vary across laboratories. First-line combined thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and freeT4 (FT4) have historically been preferred by many laboratories as this detects individuals with undiagnosed central hypothyroidism who can be missed with a first-line TSH-only strategy. However, an up-to-date evaluation of the utility of this approach is lacking. We investigated the clinical utility of first-line TSH and FT4 in the detection of central hypothyroidism in current day practice. The All-Wales laboratory information system was queried to identify thyroid function tests in patients aged ≥16 years with decreased FT4 and inappropriate TSH (low-FT4). The 1-year incidence of low-FT4 was determined using mid-year population data. Clinical information of patients with low-FT4 was reviewed to determine causes of low-FT4 and the incidence of central hypothyroidism. The incidence of low-FT4 varied according to FT4 assay method (range: 98-301 cases/100,000 population/year). Fifteen new cases of central hypothyroidism were detected in two health boards, equivalent to 2 cases/100,000 population/year. Positive predictive value of low-FT4 for central hypothyroidism was 2%-4%. In a cross-section of primary care patients, low-FT4 was detected in 0.5% of all thyroid tests with assay-related differences in detection rates. Although low-FT4 is a common laboratory finding, the incidence of central hypothyroidism remains rare. With the currently increased rates of thyroid testing and increased use of medications that decrease FT4, low-FT4 has a much lower predictive value for central hypothyroidism than previously reported. Thyroid screening strategies will need to balance the yield from first line TSH and FT4 testing with the cost of investigating individuals with non-pathological laboratory abnormalities.

Assessing Advance Care Planning Fidelity within the Context of Cognitive Impairment: The SHARE Trial

ContextAdvance care planning (ACP) is critical among primary care patients with cognitive impairment, but few interventions have tested ACP with this population. ObjectiveDescribe the development and evaluation of a tool for assessing ACP fidelity within the context of cognitive impairment, including inter-rater reliability, convergent validity, and overall fidelity using clinical trial data. DesignSHARE is a multicomponent intervention inclusive of facilitated ACP conversations. From a two group, single blind, randomized controlled trial, recorded ACP conversations were rated for fidelity. 145 primary care patients and their care partners were randomized to receive the intervention. Participating patients were 80+ years, had a care partner, and indications of cognitive impairment. An ACP Fidelity Checklist was developed with three subscales: Meeting Set-Up; ACP Meeting Topics; and Communication Skills. Scores were converted to percentages (100% = perfect fidelity) with a target of ≥80% fidelity. A post-ACP meeting report completed by ACP facilitators was used to assess convergent validity of the checklist. Intra-class correlation (ICC) was to evaluate inter-rater reliability. ResultsACP conversations averaged 33.6 minutes (SD = 14.1). The mean fidelity score across N = 91 rated meetings was 82.9%, with a range of 77.3%-90.6% for subscales. 63.7% of meetings achieved a rating of ≥80%. Cognitive function was positively associated with patient participation (rho = .59, P < 0.001). For checklist items, ICC scores ranged from 0.43–0.96. Post-ACP meeting form scores were correlated with the checklist Meeting Topics subscale (r = 0.36, P = 0.001). ConclusionsAssessing the fidelity of ACP conversations involving primary care patients living with cognitive impairment and their care partners is feasible.

Evaluating palliative care case conferences in primary care for patients with advanced non-malignant chronic conditions: a cluster-randomised controlled trial (KOPAL).

Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and dementia are underrepresented in specialist palliative home care (SPHC). However, the complexity of their conditions requires collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and SPHC teams and timely integration into SPHC to effectively meet their needs. To facilitate joint palliative care planning and the timely transfer of patients with advanced chronic non-malignant conditions to SPHC. A two-arm, unblinded, cluster-randomised controlled trial. 49 GP practices in northern Germany were randomised using web-based block randomisation. We included patients with advanced CHF, COPD and/or dementia. The KOPAL intervention consisted of a SPHC nurse-patient consultation followed by an interprofessional telephone case conference between SPHC team and GP. The primary outcome was the number of hospital admissions 48weeks after baseline. Secondary analyses examined the effects on health-related quality of life and self-rated health status, as measured by the EuroQol 5D scale. A total of 172 patients were included in the analyses. 80.4% of GP practices had worked with SHPC before, most of them exclusively for cancer patients. At baseline, patients reported a mean EQ-VAS of 48.4, a mean quality of life index (EQ-5D-5L) of 0.63 and an average of 0.80 hospital admissions in the previous year. The intervention did not significantly reduce hospital admissions (incidence rate ratio = 0.79, 95%CI: [0.49, 1.26], P= 0.31) or the number of days spent in hospital (incidence rate ratio = 0.65, 95%CI: [0.28, 1.49], P= 0.29). There was also no significant effect on quality of life (∆ = -0.02, 95%CI: [-0.09, 0.05], P= 0.53) or self-rated health (∆ = -2.48, 95%CI: [-9.95, 4.99], P= 0.51). The study did not show the hypothesised effect on hospitalisations and health-related quality of life. Future research should focus on refining this approach, with particular emphasis on optimising the timing of case conferences and implementing discussed changes to treatment plans, to improve collaboration between GPs and SPHC teams.

The role of primary care in rare disorders: A qualitative study of parents and patients managing complex vascular anomalies

ABSTRACT Background: Patients with complex rare disorders often require the care of multiple specialists. Effective coordination between primary and specialty care is needed to ensure patients receive high-quality care. Previous research has documented the importance of primary care clinicians providing referrals to specialty care and the importance of specialists in helping patients reach a diagnosis. However, little is known about primary care clinicians’ roles in the ongoing care of patients with rare disorders. In the current study, we explored the role of primary care clinicians in the care of rare and complex vascular anomalies. Materials and Methods: Data were collected using semi-structured qualitative interviews with 34 parents and 25 adult patients recruited from advocacy groups for patients with complex vascular anomalies participated. We asked participants about their diagnosis, care experiences, and communication with clinicians. We used thematic analysis to identify themes illustrating the roles of primary care clinicians. Results: PCC roles were characterized by four behaviors. Supporting behaviors included learning more about vascular anomalies and asking participants about the care they received from specialists. Facilitating included providing referrals, ordering tests, and engaging in problem-solving. Interfering included failing to provide referrals or help participants coordinate care, ordering incorrect tests, or making inappropriate recommendations. Disregarding included focusing narrowly on primary care needs and not showing concern about the vascular anomaly. Conclusions: The results reveal opportunities to improve primary care for patients with vascular anomalies. Disregarding and interfering behaviors furthered the division between primary and specialty care for patients with vascular anomalies and prevented patients from receiving comprehensive primary care. Supporting and facilitating behaviors convey genuine interest in the care of the vascular anomaly and a commitment to helping the patient and parent.

Perceived quality of care in patients with high blood pressure in primary health care

Background: the study analyzed the quality of care perceived by patients with high blood pressure in a health center in Ecuador, considering dimensions such as accessibility, opportunity, continuity, comprehensiveness, and cultural competence of the services. Hypertension in older adults represents a public health problem in the region. Objective: To analyze the quality of care perceived in patients with Arterial Hypertension in Primary Health Care. Methods: quantitative, transversal, and descriptive design. The sample was 40 patients over 65 years of age with HTN. A validated 10-item questionnaire was applied to perceived quality in several dimensions: accessibility, opportunity, continuity, comprehensiveness, and cultural competence. Results: limitations were evident in the capacity to respond to urgent needs, lack of continuity in care by the same professional, deficiencies in mental health counseling, and moderate dissatisfaction with services. Conclusions: there are significant gaps in the quality of primary care for hypertensive patients regarding accessibility, opportunity, comprehensiveness, and cultural competence. Improvements are required in these areas to ensure more responsive and patient-centered care.

Proposing a novel research method for acupoint selection

IntroductionAcupoint selection in both clinical trials and practice is predominantly informed by traditional theory and experience rather than clinical or mechanistic research. In-clinic acupoint testing methods are used by some practitioners to help determine acupoint selection based on patient feedback but to date no quantitative data on these approaches has been published. This paper reports preliminary data where an acupoint testing method was utilised to help inform acupoint selection. These results were then used to develop a theoretical framework to validate the acupoint testing approach as a novel research method. MethodsPreliminary data on the acupoint testing method was collected as part of a routine clinic audit from a single private practice in the UK using an electronic health record (EHR) and included; patient clinical demographic data, health complaints categorised according to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2) codes and patient outcomes using a Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale. The acupoint testing method used acupressure and/or acupuncture on acupoints to establish whether there was an immediate positive therapeutic effect for a patient for either; i) local areas of pain, ii) restricted/painful range of movements (ROM) and/or iii) acute symptoms related to a patients’ health complaint. ResultsA total of 506 acupoint tests were recorded from 398 treatments delivered to 74 patients (63.5% f, 36.5% m, mean age 58) presenting with predominantly chronic (77.1%) musculoskeletal (65.7%) issues. Tests were recorded for 61/74 (82.4%) patients and the mean number of tests per patient was 8.3. The majority of test results were positive (78.5%). For most patients at least one positive and negative test was recorded (52.5%). Solely positive tests were recorded for 44.3% of patients and soley negative tests were recorded for 3.3% of patients. The mixture of positive and negative test results suggests acupoint specificity may be clinically relevant. ConclusionPreliminary data suggests the testing method was versatile and useful for informing acupoint selection in clinical practice. Further research is required to establish its validity and reliability. The acupoint testing approach may represent a valuable new research method to help inform acupoint selection for both clinical trials and practice.

Brief modular anxiety intervention for primary care: Hybrid I pilot randomized controlled trial of feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness, and implementation potential

BackgroundAnxiety is highly prevalent, but undertreated, in primary care. Brief, non-pharmacological interventions are needed. Modular Anxiety Skills Training (MAST), a cognitive-behavioral anxiety intervention, was developed for primary care and tailored for a Veteran sample (MAST-V). The purpose of this mixed methods pilot study was to evaluate MAST-V's feasibility, acceptability, and implementation potential, and preliminarily examine its effectiveness compared to Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) usual care. MethodsThis hybrid I randomized controlled trial (conducted 2019–2021) assigned 35 primary care patients (Mage = 47, 17 % female, 27 % racial/ethnic minority) with clinically significant anxiety symptoms to receive MAST-V or PCBH usual care. Participants completed validated measures of anxiety symptoms and functional impairment at 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks. ResultsParticipants attended more sessions in MAST-V than usual care. After necessary adjustments to reduce session duration, MAST-V will likely fit within PCBH practice parameters. Participants in both conditions valued treatment, but treatment satisfaction, credibility, and therapeutic alliance were higher for MAST-V. Study therapists achieved high treatment fidelity and rated MAST-V as highly feasible, acceptable, and appropriate for PCBH. They identified ways to address potential barriers to implementation. MAST-V was more effective than usual care in reducing anxiety symptoms and impairment. LimitationsThis was a small pilot study at a single site using study therapists. Results should be considered preliminary until replicated in a full-scale clinical trial. ConclusionsThis brief modular anxiety intervention, which was designed with implementation in mind, may help to address the anxiety treatment gap in primary care.

Screening for Unhealthy Alcohol Use Among Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions in Primary Care

IntroductionUnhealthy alcohol use (UAU) increases risk for and exacerbation of chronic health conditions. As such, screening, prevention, and management of UAU is especially critical to improving health outcomes for patients with multiple physical or mental chronic health conditions (MCC). It is unclear to what extent multiple chronic condition (MCC) status is a barrier to screening for UAU in the primary care setting. We hypothesized that patients with MCC would be at lower odds of being screened for UAU compared with patients with no MCC. MethodsWe performed a secondary analysis of electronic health record data for patients from 67 primary care practices in Virginia (2020-2023). Using the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ chronic disease framework, we classified patients by MCC status: no MCC, physical MCC (P-MCC), mental health MCC (MH-MCC), and physical & mental health MCC (P&MH-MCC). We used multiple logistic regressions with an added practice-level random effect to analyze the relationship between MCC status and odds of receiving an alcohol-related assessment, of being screened for UAU with a U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)-recommended instrument, and of screening positive for UAU within the past 2 years. ResultsWithin a final cohort of n= 11,789, a total of 6796 patients (58%) had MCC (29% P-MCC, 4% MH-MCC, and 25% P&MH-MCC). In all, 69% of patients were screened for UAU, while 16% were screened with a USPSTF-recommended instrument and 7% screened positive for UAU. Relative to those with no MCC, patients with P&MH-MCC had 0.9 times lower odds of receiving any screening for UAU [95% CI: (0.8, 1.0), p = 0.0240], while patients with only P-MCC or only MH-MCC had similar odds. There was no difference in odds of being screened with a USPSTF-recommended instrument based on MCC status. Patients with MH-MCC and P&MH-MCC had 1.8 and 1.5 times greater odds, respectively, of screening positive for UAU [95% CI: (1.3, 2.7), p= 0.0014) and 95% CI: (1.2, 1.8), p=0.0003)]. ConclusionAlthough patients with chronic mental health conditions were more likely to screen positive for UAU than patients without MCC, Virginia primary care patients with P&MH MCC were less likely to receive an alcohol-related assessment during the past 2 years. Given the overall modest rate of screening with a USPSTF-recommended instrument, further efforts are needed to create the conditions for high quality alcohol-related preventive service delivery in primary care, particularly for patients with high complexity and/or mental health conditions.

Management of macrovascular diabetic complications: a single-center case series analysis of consecutively attending patients in primary care

Management of macrovascular diabetic complications: a single-center case series analysis of consecutively attending patients in primary care

A substance use disorder training curriculum for internal medicine residents using resident-empaneled patients.

Internal Medicine (IM) residents frequently encounter, but feel unprepared to diagnose and treat, patients with substance use disorders (SUD). This is compounded by negative regard for patients with SUD. Optimal education strategies are needed to empower IM residents to care for patients with SUD. The objective of this study was to evaluate a brief SUD curriculum for IM residents, using resident-empaneled patients as an engaging educational strategy. Following a needs assessment, a 2-part SUD curriculum was developed for IM residents at the University of Chicago during the 2018-2019 academic year as part of the ambulatory curriculum. During sessions on Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) and Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), a facilitator covered concepts about screening, diagnosis, and treatment. In session, residents completed structured worksheets applying concepts to one of their primary care patients. A post-session assessment included questions on knowledge, preparedness & attitudes. Resident needs assessment (n = 44/105, 42% response rate) showed 86% characterized instruction received during residency in SUD as none or too little, and residents did not feel prepared to treat SUD. Following the AUD session, all residents (n = 22) felt prepared to diagnose and treat AUD. After the OUD session, all residents (n = 19) felt prepared to diagnose, and 79% (n = 15) felt prepared to treat OUD. Residents planned to screen for SUD more or differently, initiate harm reduction strategies and increase consideration of pharmacotherapy. A brief curricular intervention for AUD and OUD using resident-empaneled patients can empower residents to integrate SUD diagnosis and management into practice.

Computerized clinical decision support to improve stroke prevention therapy in primary care management of atrial fibrillation: a cluster randomized trial

Despite guidelines supporting antithrombotic therapy use in atrial fibrillation (AF), under-prescribing persists. We assessed whether computerized clinical decision support (CDS) would enable guideline-based antithrombotic therapy for AF patients in primary care. This cluster randomized trial of CDS versus usual care (UC) recruited participants from primary care practices across Nova Scotia, following them for 12 months. The CDS tool calculated bleeding and stroke risk scores and provided recommendations for using oral anticoagulants (OAC) per Canadian guidelines. From June 14, 2014 to December 15, 2016, 203 primary care providers (99 UC, 104 CDS) with access to high-speed Internet were recruited, enrolling 1,145 eligible patients (543 UC, 590 CDS) assigned to the same treatment arm as their provider. Patient mean age was 72.3 years; most were male (350, 64.5% UC, 351, 59.5% CDS) and from a rural area (298, 54.9% UC, 315, 53.4% CDS). At baseline, a higher than anticipated proportion of patients were receiving guideline-based OAC therapy (373, 68.7% UC, 442, 74.9% CDS; relative risk [RR] 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-1.07; P = .511)). At 12 months, prescription data were available for 538 usual care and 570 CDS patients, and significantly more CDS patients were managed according to guidelines (415, 77.1% UC, 479, 84.0% CDS; RR 1.08 (95% CI, 1.01-1.15; P = .024)). Notwithstanding high baseline rates, primary care provider access to the CDS over 12 months further optimized the prescribing of OAC therapy per national guidelines to AF patients potentially eligible to receive it. This suggests that CDS can be effective in improving clinical process of care. Clinical Trials NCT01927367. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01927367?term=NCT01927367&draw=2&rank=1.

Advancing social care integration in health systems with community health workers: an implementation evaluation based in Bronx, New York

BackgroundIn recent years, health systems have expanded the focus on health equity to include health-related social needs (HRSNs) screening. Community health workers (CHWs) are positioned to address HRSNs by serving as linkages between health systems, social services, and the community. This study describes a health system’s 12-month experience integrating CHWs to navigate HRSNs among primary care patients in Bronx County, NY.MethodsWe organized process and outcome measures using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) implementation framework domains to evaluate a CHW intervention of the Community Health Worker Institute (CHWI). We used descriptive and inferential statistics to assess RE-AIM outcomes and socio-demographic characteristics of patients who self-reported at least 1 HRSN and were referred to and contacted by CHWs between October 2022 and September 2023.ResultsThere were 4,420 patients who self-reported HRSNs in the standardized screening tool between October 2022 and September 2023. Of these patients, 1,245 were referred to a CHW who completed the first outreach attempt during the study period. An additional 1,559 patients self-reported HRSNs directly to a clinician or CHW without being screened and were referred to and contacted by a CHW. Of the 2,804 total patients referred, 1,939 (69.2%) were successfully contacted and consented to work with a CHW for HRSN navigation. Overall, 78.1% (n = 1,515) of patients reported receiving social services. Adoption of the CHW clinician champion varied by clinical team (median 22.2%; IQR 13.3–39.0%); however, there was no difference in referral rates between those with and without a clinician champion (p = 0.50). Implementation of CHW referrals via an electronic referral order appeared successful (73.2%) and timely (median 11 days; IQR 2–26 days) compared to standard CHWI practices. Median annual cost per household per CHW for the intervention was determined to be $184.02 (IQR $134.72 – $202.12).ConclusionsWe observed a significant proportion of patients reporting successful receipt of social services following engagement with an integrated CHW model. There are additional implementation factors that require further inquiry and research to understand barriers and enabling factors to integrate CHWs within clinical teams.

Prevalence and distributions of severely elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) according to age, gender and clinic location among patients in the Malaysian primary care

BackgroundAdults with severely elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) may have familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) and are at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The prevalence of elevated LDL-c in primary care clinics in Malaysia is not known. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and distributions of severely elevated LDL-c among adult patients attending public primary care clinics in Malaysia. MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at 11 public primary care clinics in the central states of Malaysia, among adults ≥18 years old with LDL-c recorded in the electronic medical record. Sociodemographic and LDL-c data from 2018 to 2020 were extracted. Severely elevated LDL-c was defined as ≥4 mmol/L, which were further classified into: 4.0–4.9, 5.0–5.9, 6.0–6.9 and ≥ 7 mmol/L. ResultsOut of 139,702 patients, 44,374 (31.8 %) had severely elevated LDL-c of ≥4 mmol/L of which the majority were females (56.7 %). The mean (±SD) age of patients with severely elevated LDL-c was younger at 56.3 (±13.2) years compared to those with LDL-c of <4.0 mmol/L at 59.3 (±14.5) years. In terms of LDL-c levels, 30,751 (69.3 %), 10,412 (23.5 %), 2,499 (5.6 %) and 712 (1.6 %) were in the 4.0–4.9, 5.0–5.9, 6.0–6.9 and ≥ 7 mmol/L categories, respectively. ConclusionThe prevalence of severely elevated LDL-c of ≥4.0 mmol/L among adult patients in public primary care clinics was high. These patients need to be further investigated for secondary and inherited causes such as FH. Therapeutic lifestyle modification and pharmacological management are pivotal to prevent ASCVD in these patients.

Top tips for managing the bleeding patient in primary care.

Top tips for managing the bleeding patient in primary care.

Testing a new model of telehealth-delivered treatment for primary care patients with alcohol use disorder: A randomized controlled trial protocol

BackgroundThe majority of adults suffering from alcohol use disorders (AUD) do not receive treatment. To address this gap in care, we must develop new models to increase identification, engagement and delivery of accessible and effective treatment. This paper describes the protocol for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) testing a novel telehealth treatment model for primary care patients with untreated AUD. MethodsWe aim to recruit 300 adults across 2 healthcare systems for this two-arm RCT. Participants, initially identified for recruitment based on AUD-related indicators in their electronic health record (EHR), are RCT-eligible if they meet AUD criteria (mild, moderate, severe), report ≥ 3 drinking days/week in past 30 days, and have not received AUD psychotherapy in the past 90 days. Participants are randomized to an intervention or enhanced usual care control (EUC) condition, both individually-delivered. The intervention includes a telephone-delivered motivational interviewing (MI) engagement session and 8 sessions of MI-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MI-CBT). EUC involves AUD psychoeducation, advice to reduce drinking and seek treatment, and provision of community resources. Outcomes will be measured at 3-, 6-, and 12-months; primary outcomes include: AUD psychotherapy initiation and engagement (within the study and external community) and alcohol consumption (percent drinking days and heavy drinking days). ConclusionsThis study addresses whether proactive patient identification and engagement and delivery of patient-centered telehealth psychotherapy to patients with untreated AUD is effective in increasing treatment use and improving alcohol outcomes. If effective, this could be a highly scalable model for reducing the public health impact of AUD. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov # NCT05410561. University of Michigan HUM00204315. Ann Arbor VA IRB #1655886.

P185 Anatomical patterns of pain in primary care patients with polymyalgia rheumatica compared to the general population

Abstract Background/Aims Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is common in older adults, causing severe pain and stiffness, particularly in the shoulder and hip girdles. A tapered course of glucocorticoids is recommended, but not always straightforward, with frequent symptom recurrence. Reasons are unclear, but partial masking of painful comorbidities (e.g., osteoarthritis) may play a part. Methods 652 people with incident PMR were recruited from English general practice (2012-2014) to a postal survey study (questionnaires at diagnosis, 1, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, [mean] 61 months). Surveys included a body manikin (front and back views). Participants were asked to shade anywhere they experienced pain &amp;gt;1 day in the last month. 44 mutually exclusive areas were defined as painful or not. For comparison, an age-gender matched random sample of 652 people was selected from a general population survey in North Staffordshire that used the same manikins. Pain prevalence was compared between the 2 studies. Results In the PMR study, surveys were completed by 244 participants at 24 months and 197 at 61 months. Pain was reported in a mean of 17.1 areas at diagnosis (Table). Bilateral shoulder and hip pain were present in the majority at diagnosis (shoulder 81%; hips 59%) and in around a third and a fifth of patients respectively throughout the study. The prevalence of bilateral shoulder and hip pain remained higher than in the general population sample, while unilateral pain in these areas was less common. Bilateral hand (27%) and knee (45%) pain were also common at diagnosis. After 1 month, the mean number of pain areas was 7 - similar to the general population. However, prevalence of bilateral shoulder and hip pain remained higher than the general population throughout follow-up. Unilateral hip and knee pain were persistently less common in those with PMR, whilst unilateral hip pain was more common. Conclusion Bilateral pain was reported more commonly across the disease course in people with PMR than the general population. Causes of pain cannot be accurately attributed, but are likely multifactorial, including PMR disease activity, treatment and painful comorbidities. However, the persistence of bilateral pain suggests untreated PMR symptoms, requiring further research. Disclosure N. Hammad: None. R. Partington: None. S. Hider: None. H. Butt: None. T. Helliwell: None. C. Mallen: None. S. Muller: None.

Preventing Iatrogenic Injury to the Vertebral Artery in Cervical Spine Surgery: A Case Report.

Iatrogenic injury of the vertebral artery (VA) in the context of surgical approaches to the cervical spine has been cited as a relatively rare complication with varying degrees of severity ranging from minimal injury to acute stroke and can result in death. It is estimated that ~50% of cases of iatrogenic VA injury are preventable after postoperatively examining a patient's preoperative imaging. Despite the low incidence (<2%) of this complication, the potential associated morbidity demonstrates the importance of meticulous preoperative vascular consideration. This study aims to emphasize the importance of preoperative vascular screening during anterior cervical access planning visualized through a rare case of a VA aberration in a 47-year-old patient. This study is designed as a retrospective case report. A thorough chart review was performed for this subject including all prior medical records, imaging studies, imaging reports, operative notes, and communication records. The subject was found to have a history of patent foramen ovale (PFO) repair with a rare vertebral artery malformation described as a medial transposition of the vertebral artery out of the vertebral artery foramen between C3 and C4. Consideration of cervical anatomy, particularly the VA, is key to minimizing the risk of adverse surgical outcomes in both anterior and posterior approaches to the cervical spine. During the workup process, the patient's primary care providers, radiologists, and surgeons should be aware of the potential variations of the VA with particular attention given to the course of the VA on MR imaging. Level IV.