Primary Care Encounters Research Articles

Evaluation and management of irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common diagnosis that providers encounter in primary and specialty care. IBS is characterized by chronic abdominal pain and altered bowel habits. The American College of Gastroenterology recently released an updated guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with IBS. According to the guideline, it remains important to confirm diagnosis based on criteria and lack of alarm signs; IBS should not be a diagnosis of exclusion. Management should be focused on addressing altered bowel habits and global symptoms using a multidisciplinary approach.

Nurse Practitioner Students' Knowledge Assessment and Perceived Preparedness to Triage Ophthalmology Complaints in a Primary Care Setting: An Educational Intervention.

Purpose In this proof-of-concept pilot study, we aimed to increase nurse practitioner (NP) student knowledge of ophthalmology to prepare NPs for encounters in primary care settings. The Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO) and the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) endorse core knowledge that medical students should achieve. We assess the effectiveness of an innovative ophthalmologist-led curriculum based on these competencies tailored to issues NPs encounter in primary care. Methods Johns Hopkins University NP students enrolled in a pre-post-cohort study and educational intervention. The didactic program was developed according to AUPO and AAO core ophthalmology content for medical students and was taught in-person by an ophthalmologist. Pre-post-assessments evaluated students' perceived readiness to encounter ophthalmic issues in the clinic and baseline knowledge of core competencies of ophthalmology. Results A total of 42 NP students were included in the analysis. NP students improved in core knowledge and readiness to encounter ophthalmology issues. After the educational event, there was a statistically significant improvement in students' ratings of preparedness to obtain a focused history, exam, perform initial management and decide the urgency of a referral for acute painless vision loss ( p < 0.001), chronic vision loss ( p < 0.001), or a patient with a red/painful eye ( p < 0.001). Students showed a statistically significant improvement in postdidactic event core ophthalmology knowledge assessment scores ( p = 0.002). Conclusion Primary care NPs are increasingly the initial point of contact for patients with ophthalmic complaints, and thus, high-quality and thorough education regarding ophthalmology triage and referral for NPs is necessary. NP student comfort with and knowledge of ophthalmic complaints and triage may be improved by a brief educational intervention taught by an ophthalmologist early in the NP curriculum.

Lost to follow-up: Post-operative polysomnography in at-risk, pediatric obstructive sleep apnea

Analyze adherence to AASM recommendations for post-operative polysomnography in eligible pediatric patients.Retrospective Cohort.Tertiary, Outpatient Sleep Lab.We conducted a retrospective analysis of pediatric patients, ages 1-17, previously diagnosed with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea that completed a surgical intervention. Chart review included demographic data, a co-morbidity of interest, the presence of an otolaryngology, primary care, or sleep medicine encounter, time to follow-up, the presence of a post-operative polysomnography, time to post-operative polysomnography, and the presence of an annual follow-up with any provider.Of the 373 patients, 67 patients met inclusion criteria. Fifty-nine followed-up with any provider, with 21 completing post-operative polysomnography. Patients with residual or recurrent symptoms (p < 0.01) and all patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (p = 0.04) were more likely to complete post-operative polysomnography (PSG). Sub-analysis across at-risk categories (isolated moderate, isolated severe, moderate & a co-morbidity, and severe & a co-morbidity) revealed patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea & a co-morbidity completed a follow-up PSG more often than isolated moderate obstructive sleep apnea (p = 0.01). There was a difference in follow-up with sleep medicine across at-risk categories (p < 0.01).Recurrent symptoms and increasing disease severity were associated with obtaining post-operative polysomnography. However, variability existed for which patients completed post-operative polysomnography. We speculate an inconsistent standard across disciplines, inadequate post-operative obstructive sleep apnea management education, and uncoordinated systemic processes contribute to this discrepancy. Our findings support a standardized, multi-disciplinary care pathway for the management of at-risk, pediatric obstructive sleep apnea.

Prevalence ofNeck Pain inSoldiers as a Result ofMild Traumatic Brain Injury-Associated Trauma.

Many of the injury mechanisms that cause mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) also create forces commonly associated with whiplash, resulting in cervical pain injury. The prevalence of associated neck pain with mTBI is not well established. There is a strong indication that injury to the cervical spine may aggravate, cause, and/or impact recovery of symptoms and impairments associated with the concussive event and its primary effect on the brain. The purpose of this study is to help identify the prevalence of ensuing cervical pain within 90 days of a previously documented mTBI and to examine the role of neck pain during concurrent concussive symptoms, in a military population stationed at a large military installation. This retrospective design utilized a de-identified dataset using predetermined search and filter criteria, which included male active duty service members (SMs), 20 to 45 years of age, who received medical care at any clinic on Fort Liberty (Fort Bragg, NC) during fiscal year (FY) 2012 to FY 2019, with documented cervicalgia and mTBI (via the International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes), verified using electronic medical records. The final dataset served as the basis for subject sampling and was analyzed to determine the total number of documented cervicalgia and mTBI diagnoses. Results are presented as descriptive statistics. Approval for this study was received from the Andrews University Office of Research (18-097) and the Womack Army Medical Center Human Protections Office. Between FY 2012 and FY 2019, 14,352 unique SMs accessed a Fort Bragg, NC health care facility, at least once(TableI). Overall, 52% of SMs diagnosed with cervicalgia were found to have a previously diagnosed mTBI during the 90 days before the cervicalgia diagnosis. In contrast, the prevalence of same-day cervicalgia and mTBI diagnosis was <1% (TableIV). The prevalence of isolated cervicalgia diagnosis at any time during the reporting period was 3%, whereas isolated mTBI diagnosis was 1% (TableIII). Over 50% of SMs diagnosed with cervicalgia had sustained a documented mTBI within 90 days prior, whereas less than 1% were diagnosed with cervicalgia at the time of initial primary care or emergency room encounter following the mTBI event. This finding suggests that the close anatomical and neurophysiological connections between the head and the cervical spine are both likely to be impacted through the same mechanism of injury. Delayed evaluation (and treatment) of the cervical spine may contribute to lingering post-concussive symptoms. Limitations of this retrospective review include the inability to assess the causality of the relationship between neck pain and mTBI, as only the existence and strength of the prevalence relationship can be identified. The outcome data are exploratory and intended to identify relationships and trends that may suggest further study across installations and across mTBI populations.

1797-PUB: Perspectives of Primary Care Providers on the Acceptability of a Brief Video to Decrease the Use of Diabetes-Stigmatizing Language

Diabetes stigma is recognized to negatively impact health-related outcomes and quality of life in adults living with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The American Diabetes Association provides guidance for health care providers to decrease the use of diabetes-stigmatizing language. The aim of this qualitative study is to explore primary care providers’ (PCPs’) perspectives on the acceptability of a brief video that we developed to decrease the use of diabetes-stigmatizing language in patient-PCP encounters. PCPs were recruited online from professional organizations and via snowball sampling to participate in a single individual interview via Zoom (December 2021- October 2022). Trained interviewers conducted the interviews via Zoom using a semi-structured interview guide. A qualitative descriptive approach was used in the analysis. Eighteen PCPs were interviewed (44% aged 30-39 years old, 78% female, 78% non-Hispanic White, and 50% nurse practitioners). Qualitative description resulted in 3 major themes. Some PCPs perceive that the language used in patient-PCP encounters appears to play an outsized role in the culture of the clinic as far as endorsing or confronting diabetes stigma. Some PCPs perceive that they already advocate for decreasing the use of diabetes-stigmatizing language by being a role model for fellow PCPs and other colleagues. Some PCPs voiced their perspectives about the potential barriers to shifting PCPs away from the use of diabetes-stigmatizing language, including differing points of view regarding practices for establishing authority and the difficulties of breaking engrained habits. These findings support the acceptability of the video among PCPs for addressing diabetes-stigmatizing language in patient-provider encounters in primary care. Disclosure K.Joiner: None. A.Agapiou: None. M.Adams: None. G.Piatt: None.

Comparative effectiveness of safety planning intervention with instrumental support calls (ISC) versus safety planning intervention with two-way text message caring contacts (CC) in adolescents and adults screening positive for suicide risk in emergency departments and primary care clinics: Protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

BackgroundSuicide is a leading cause of death in adolescents and adults in the US. Follow-up support delivered when patients return home after an emergency department (ED) or primary care encounter can significantly reduce suicidal ideation and attempts. Two follow-up models to augment usual care including the Safety Planning Intervention have high efficacy: Instrumental Support Calls (ISC) and Caring Contacts (CC) two-way text messages, but they have never been compared to assess which works best. This protocol for the Suicide Prevention Among Recipients of Care (SPARC) Trial aims to determine which model is most effective for adolescents and adults with suicide risk. MethodsThe SPARC Trial is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of ISC versus CC. The sample includes 720 adolescents (12–17 years) and 790 adults (18+ years) who screen positive for suicide risk during an ED or primary care encounter. All participants receive usual care and are randomized 1:1 to ISC or CC. The state suicide hotline delivers both follow-up interventions. The trial is single-masked, with participants unaware of the alternative treatment, and is stratified by adolescents/adults. The primary outcome is suicidal ideation and behavior, measured using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) screener at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include C-SSRS at 12 months, and loneliness, return to crisis care for suicidality, and utilization of outpatient mental health services at 6 and 12 months. DiscussionDirectly comparing ISC and CC will determine which follow-up intervention is most effective for suicide prevention in adolescents and adults.

Predicting emergency department visits among children with asthma in two academic medical systems

Objective: To develop and validate a predictive algorithm that identifies pediatric patients at risk of asthma-related emergencies, and to test whether algorithm performance can be improved in an external site via local retraining. Methods: In a retrospective cohort at the first site, data from 26 008 patients with asthma aged 2–18 years (2012–2017) were used to develop a lasso-regularized logistic regression model predicting emergency department visits for asthma within one year of a primary care encounter, known as the Asthma Emergency Risk (AER) score. Internal validation was conducted on 8634 patient encounters from 2018. External validation of the AER score was conducted using 1313 pediatric patient encounters from a second site during 2018. The AER score components were then reweighted using logistic regression using data from the second site to improve local model performance. Prediction intervals (PI) were constructed via 10 000 bootstrapped samples. Results: At the first site, the AER score had a cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.768 (95% PI: 0.745–0.790) during model training and an AUROC of 0.769 in the 2018 internal validation dataset (p = 0.959). When applied without modification to the second site, the AER score had an AUROC of 0.684 (95% PI: 0.624–0.742). After local refitting, the cross-validated AUROC improved to 0.737 (95% PI: 0.676–0.794; p = 0.037 as compared to initial AUROC). Conclusions: The AER score demonstrated strong internal validity, but external validity was dependent on reweighting model components to reflect local data characteristics at the external site.

Disparities in Referral Initiation and Completion at an Urban FQHC Look-alike (FQHC-LA) Clinic.

The purpose of this study was to determine referral initiation and completion disparities across primary care encounters at the Hope Family Care Center (HFCC) in Kansas City, MO, by payor type (primary insurance): private insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, and self-pay. Data were collected and analyzed for all encounters (N = 4,235) over a 15-month period, including payor type, referral initiation and completion, and demographics. Referral initiation and completion were calculated by payor type and differences analyzed using Chi-square tests and t-tests. Logistic regression examined payor type association with referral initiation and completion, accounting for demographic variables. Our analysis showed a meaningful difference in rate of referral to specialists by payor type. The Medicaid encounter referral initiation rate was higher than rates for all other payor types (7.4% vs. 5.0%), and self-pay encounters' referral initiation rate was lower than rates for all other payor types (3.8% vs. 6.4%). Using logistic regression, Medicaid encounters had 1.4 greater odds, and self-pay encounters 0.7 greater odds, of initiating a referral compared to private insurance encounters. There was no difference in referral completion by payor type or demographic category. Equal referral completion rates across payor types suggested HFCC may have had well-established referral resources for patients. Higher referral initiation rates for Medicaid and lower for self-pay may suggest that insurance coverage offered financial confidence when seeking specialist care. Higher odds of Medicaid encounters initiating a referral could imply greater health needs among Medicaid patients.

Public health nurses experience of mental health encounters in the context of primary health care: a constructivist grounded theory study

BackgroundIn primary health care people with mental health needs are often overlooked or masked with physical complaints. It has been suggested that public health nurses lack sufficient knowledge when encountering people with mental health problems. Low levels of mental health literacy among professionals are associated with negative patient outcome. There is a need to understand public health nurses process and strategies used when encountering a person with mental health problems in order to promote mental health. This study aimed to construct a theory that explains the process of public health nurses experience when encountering people with mental health problems based on their knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about mental health.MethodsA constructivist grounded theory design was used to meet the aim of the study. Interviews were conducted with 13 public health nurses working in primary health care between October 2019 and June 2021, and the data analysis was performed according to the principles of Charmaz.ResultsThe core category, “Public health nurses as a relationship builder – to initiate the dialogue” reflected the process while the main categories “Being on your own”, “Being on top of things- knowing your limits”, and “Professional comfort zone” reflected conditions that were decisive for initiating a dialogue.ConclusionManaging mental health encounters in primary health care was a personal and complex decision-making process that depends on the public health nurses’ professional comfort zone and acquired mental health literacy. Narratives of the public health nurses helped to construct a theory and understand the conditions for recognizing, managing and promoting mental health in primary health care.

The Association of Mobility, Social Deprivation, and Pediatric Primary Care Outcomes in Community Health Centers

To examine how social deprivation and residential mobility are associated with primary care use in children seeking care at community health centers (CHCs) overall and stratified by race and ethnicity. We used electronic health record open cohort data from 152 896 children receiving care from 15 US CHCs belonging to the OCHIN network. Patients were aged 3-17years, with ≥2 primary care visits during 2012-2017 and had geocoded address data. We used negative binomial regression to calculate adjusted rates of primary care encounters and influenza vaccinations relative to neighborhood-level social deprivation. Higher rates of clinic utilization were observed for children who always lived in highly deprived neighborhoods (RR=1.11, 95% CI=1.05-1.17) and those who moved from low-to-high deprivation neighborhoods (RR=1.05, 95% CI=1.01-1.09) experienced higher rates of CHC encounters compared with children who always lived in the low-deprivation neighborhoods. This trend was similar for influenza vaccinations. When analyses were stratified by race and ethnicity, we found these relationships were similar for Latino children and non-Latino White children who always lived in highly deprived neighborhoods. Residential mobility was associated with lower rates of primary care. These findings suggest that children living in or moving to neighborhoods with high levels of social deprivation used more primary care CHC services than children who lived in areas with low deprivation, but moving itself was associated with less care. Clinician and delivery system awareness of patient mobility and its impacts are important to addressing equity in primary care.

The impact of COVID-19 on psychiatric clinical encounters among low-income racially-diverse children.

There is a lack of longitudinal data to examine the impact of COVID-19 on all types of clinical encounters among United States, underrepresented BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and people of color), children. This study aims to examine the changes in all the outpatient clinical encounters during the pandemic compared to the baseline, with particular attention to psychiatric encounters and diagnoses. This study analyzed 3-year (January 2019 to December 2021) longitudinal clinical encounter data from 3,394 children in the Boston Birth Cohort, a US urban, predominantly low-income, Black and Hispanic children. Outcomes of interest were completed outpatient clinical encounters and their modalities (telemedicine vs. in person), including psychiatric care and diagnoses, primary care, emergency department (ED), and developmental and behavioral pediatrics (DBP). The study children's mean (SD) age is 13.9 (4.0) years. Compared to 2019, psychiatric encounters increased by 38% in 2020, most notably for diagnoses of adjustment disorders, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorders (PTSD). In contrast, primary care encounters decreased by 33%, ED encounters decreased by 55%, and DBP care decreased by 16% in 2020. Telemedicine was utilized the most for psychiatric and DBP encounters and the least for primary care encounters in 2020. A remarkable change in 2021 was the return of primary care encounters to the 2019 level, but psychiatric encounters fluctuated with spikes in COVID-19 case numbers. Among this sample of US BIPOC children, compared to the 2019 baseline, psychiatric encounters increased by 38% during 2020, most notably for the new diagnoses of adjustment disorder, depression, and PTSD. The 2021 data showed a full recovery of primary care encounters to the baseline level but psychiatric encounters remained sensitive to the pandemic spikes. The long-term impact of the pandemic on children's mental health warrants further investigation.

“Can you hear me now?”: a qualitative exploration of communication quality in virtual primary care encounters for patients with intellectual and developmental disabilities

BackgroundHigh quality communication is central to effective primary care. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a dramatic increase in virtual care but little is known about how this may affect communication quality. Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) can experience challenges communicating or communicate in non-traditional ways. This study explored how the use of virtual modalities, including telephone and video, affects communication in primary care interactions for patients with IDD.MethodsThis qualitative descriptive study included semi-structured interviews with a multi-stakeholder sample of 38 participants, including 11 adults with IDD, 13 family caregivers, 5 IDD support staff and 9 primary care physicians. Interviews were conducted in Ontario, Canada between March and November 2021 by video-conference or telephone. A mixed inductive and deductive thematic analysis approach was used to code the data and identify themes. Themes were reviewed and refined with members of each stakeholder group.ResultsFour elements of communication were identified that were affected by virtual care: (1) patient engagement in the virtual appointment; (2) the ability to hear other participants and have the time and space to be heard; (3) the ability to use nonverbal communication strategies; and (4) the ability to form trusting relationships. In some cases, the virtual platform hindered these elements of communication. Video offered some advantages over telephone to support nonverbal communication, and stimulate engagement; though this could be limited by technical challenges. For adults with IDD who find it difficult to attend in-person appointments, virtual care improved communication quality by allowing them to participate from a space where they were comfortable.ConclusionThough there are circumstances in which virtual delivery can improve communication for patients with IDD, there are also challenges to achieving high quality patient-provider communication over telephone and video. Improved infrastructure and training for providers, patients and caregivers can help improve communication quality, though in some cases it may never be appropriate. A flexible patient-centred approach is needed that includes in-person, telephone and video options for care.

Encouragement of patients’ self-management in primary care for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases (DECADE): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

IntroductionCardiovascular diseases are the most common cause of death in Germany and among the most frequent reasons for encounters in primary care. Most patients with cardiovascular risks (CVRs) have difficulties...

Mental Health Diagnoses, Health Care Utilization, and Placement Stability on Antipsychotic Prescribing Among Foster Care Youth.

This study sought to examine how mental health diagnoses, health care utilization and foster care placement instability affect antipsychotic prescribing and how these factors may contribute to disproportionate antipsychotic prescribing among youth in foster care. This retrospective cohort study utilized EHR data that were linked to administrative child welfare data. Two outcome variables were analyzed: 1) any antipsychotic prescription documented and 2) number of antipsychotic prescriptions documented. Predictor variables included foster care status, number of unique mental health diagnoses, counts of health care encounters over the study period, and counts of foster care placements. Covariates included gender, persons of color, and age in years. Models were estimated using logistic regression for the dichotomous outcome and Poisson regression for the count outcome. Increased antipsychotic prescribing among children in foster care persists even after accounting for mental health diagnoses and health care utilization. However, the number of placements modified the effect of foster care involvement on antipsychotic prescribing such that after 2 placement changes, the odds of being prescribed an antipsychotic surpassed the effect of foster care involvement. More mental health diagnoses, more inpatient and emergency health care encounters, and more foster care placements were associated with an increased odds of being prescribed an antipsychotic and an increased count of antipsychotic prescriptions. Decreased primary care encounters were associated with increased odds of antipsychotic prescriptions, and decreased specialty encounters were associated with higher counts of antipsychotic prescriptions. Placement instability is associated with disproportionate antipsychotic prescribing among youth in foster care.

Food Insecurity Screening in Primary Care: Patterns During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Encounter Modality

Screening for food insecurity in clinical settings is recommended, but implementation varies widely. This study evaluated the prevalence of screening for food insecurity and other social risks in telehealth versus in-person encounters during the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in screening before versus after widespread COVID-19 vaccine availability. These cross-sectional analyses used electronic health record and ancillary clinic data from a national network of 400+ community health centers with a shared electronic health record. Food insecurity screening was characterized in 2022 in a sample of 275,465 first encounters for routine primary care at any network clinic during March 11, 2020-December 31, 2021. An adjusted multivariate multilevel probit model estimated screening prevalence on the basis of encounter mode (in-person versus telehealth) and time period (initial pandemic versus after vaccine availability) in a random subsample of 11,000 encounters. Encounter mode was related to food insecurity screening (p<0.0001), with an estimated 9.2% screening rate during in-person encounters, compared with 5.1% at telehealth encounters. There was an interaction between time period and encounter mode (p<0.0001), with higher screening prevalence at in-person versus telehealth encounters after COVID-19 vaccines were available (11.7% vs 4.9%) than before vaccines were available (7.8% vs 5.2%). Food insecurity screening in first primary care encounters is low overall, with lower rates during telehealth visits and the earlier phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research should explore the methods for enhancing social risk screening in telehealth encounters.

The Impact of an Electronic Portal on Patient Encounters in Primary Care: Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.

Electronic patient portals are online applications that allow patients access to their own health information, a form of asynchronous virtual care. The long-term impact of portals on the use of traditional primary care services is unclear, but it is an important question at this juncture, when portals are being incorporated into many primary care practices. We sought to investigate how an electronic patient portal affected the use of traditional, synchronous primary care services over a much longer time period than any existing studies and to assess the impact of portal messaging on clinicians' workload. We conducted a propensity-score-matched, open-cohort, interrupted time-series evaluation of a primary care portal from its implementation in 2010. We extracted information from the electronic medical record regarding age, sex, education, income, family health team enrollment, diagnoses at index date, and number of medications prescribed in the previous year. We also extracted the annual number of encounters for up to 8 years before and after the index date and provider time spent on secure messaging through the portal. A total of 7247 eligible portal patients and 7647 eligible potential controls were identified, with 3696 patients matched one to one. We found that portal registration was associated with an increase in the number of certain traditional encounters over the time period surrounding portal registration. Following the index year, there was a significant jump in annual number of visits to physicians in the portal arm (0.42 more visits/year vs control, P<.001) but not for visits to nurse practitioners and physician assistants. The annual number of calls to the practice triage nurses also showed a greater increase in the portal arm compared to the control arm after the index year (an additional 0.10 calls, P=.006). The average provider time spent on portal-related work was 5.7 minutes per patient per year. We found that portal registration was associated with a subsequent increase in the number of some traditional encounters and an increase in clerical workload for providers. Portals have enormous potential to truly engage patients as partners in their own health care, but their impact on use of traditional health care services and clerical burden must also be considered when they are incorporated into primary care.

Alcohol treatment discussions and clinical outcomes among patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis

BackgroundAlcohol cessation is the cornerstone of treatment for alcohol-related cirrhosis. This study evaluated associations between medical conversations about alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment, AUD treatment engagement, and mortality.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included all patients with ICD-10 diagnosis codes for cirrhosis and AUD who were engaged in hepatology care in a single healthcare system in 2015. Baseline demographic, medical, liver disease, and AUD treatment data were assessed. AUD treatment discussions and initiation, alcohol cessation, and subsequent 5-year mortality were collected. Multivariable models were used to assess the factors associated with subsequent AUD treatment and 5-year mortality.ResultsAmong 436 patients with cirrhosis due to alcohol, 65 patients (15%) received AUD treatment at baseline, including 48 (11%) receiving behavioral therapy alone, 11 (2%) receiving pharmacotherapy alone, and 6 (1%) receiving both. Over the first year after a baseline hepatology visit, 37 patients engaged in AUD treatment, 51 were retained in treatment, and 14 stopped treatment. Thirty percent of patients had hepatology-documented AUD treatment recommendations and 26% had primary care-documented AUD treatment recommendations. Most hepatology (86%) and primary care (88%) recommendations discussed behavioral therapy alone. Among patients with ongoing alcohol use at baseline, AUD treatment one year later was significantly, independently associated with AUD treatment discussions with hepatology (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 3.23, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.58, 6.89) or primary care (aOR: 2.95; 95% CI: 1.44, 6.15) and negatively associated with having Medicaid insurance (aOR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.93). When treatment was discussed in both settings, high rates of treatment ensued (aOR: 10.72, 95% CI: 3.89, 33.52). Over a 5-year follow-up period, 152 (35%) patients died. Ongoing alcohol use, age, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma were significantly associated with mortality in the final survival model.ConclusionAUD treatment discussions were documented in less than half of hepatology and primary care encounters in patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis, though such discussions were significantly associated with receipt of AUD treatment.

"Mm-hm," "Uh-uh": are non-lexical conversational sounds deal breakers for the ambient clinical documentation technology?

Ambient clinical documentation technology uses automatic speech recognition (ASR) and natural language processing (NLP) to turn patient-clinician conversations into clinical documentation. It is a promising approach to reducing clinician burden and improving documentation quality. However, the performance of current-generation ASR remains inadequately validated. In this study, we investigated the impact of non-lexical conversational sounds (NLCS) on ASR performance. NLCS, such as Mm-hm and Uh-uh, are commonly used to convey important information in clinical conversations, for example, Mm-hm as a "yes" response from the patient to the clinician question "are you allergic to antibiotics?" In this study, we evaluated 2 contemporary ASR engines, Google Speech-to-Text Clinical Conversation ("Google ASR"), and Amazon Transcribe Medical ("Amazon ASR"), both of which have their language models specifically tailored to clinical conversations. The empirical data used were from 36 primary care encounters. We conducted a series of quantitative and qualitative analyses to examine the word error rate (WER) and the potential impact of misrecognized NLCS on the quality of clinical documentation. Out of a total of 135647 spoken words contained in the evaluation data, 3284 (2.4%) were NLCS. Among these NLCS, 76 (0.06% of total words, 2.3% of all NLCS) were used to convey clinically relevant information. The overall WER, of all spoken words, was 11.8% for Google ASR and 12.8% for Amazon ASR. However, both ASR engines demonstrated poor performance in recognizing NLCS: the WERs across frequently used NLCS were 40.8% (Google) and 57.2% (Amazon), respectively; and among the NLCS that conveyed clinically relevant information, 94.7% and 98.7%, respectively. Current ASR solutions are not capable of properly recognizing NLCS, particularly those that convey clinically relevant information. Although the volume of NLCS in our evaluation data was very small (2.4% of the total corpus; and for NLCS that conveyed clinically relevant information: 0.06%), incorrect recognition of them could result in inaccuracies in clinical documentation and introduce new patient safety risks.

Disparities in Use of Virtual Primary Care During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic increased the use of virtual health care. However, certain factors may disparately affect some patients' utilization of virtual care. Associations between age, racial categories (White or Black), and socioeconomic disadvantage were evaluated during the early COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This cross-sectional retrospective study included adult patients with virtual or in-person primary care encounters at a large, midwestern hospital system with widespread urban and suburban offices between March 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020. Virtual visits included synchronous video and telephone visits and asynchronous patient portal E-visits. Chi-squared tests and multivariable logistic analysis assessed the associations between ages and racial categories, and area deprivation index with the use of virtual versus in-person primary care. Results: Of 72,153 patient encounters, 43.0% were virtual visits, 54.6% were White patients, and 45.4% were Black. Across equivalent age ranges, black patients were slightly less likely to utilize virtual care than similarly aged White patients, but not consistently across virtual modalities. Women were more likely to use virtual care across all modalities, and individuals >65 years were more likely to use telephone visits and less likely to use video and E-visits, regardless of race. Patients residing in areas with the greatest socioeconomic advantage were more likely to utilize video and E-visits. Conclusions: Differential patterns of utilization emerged across racial categories and age ranges, suggesting that racial disparities are exacerbated depending upon patient age and mode of utilization.

The Diagnostic Value of the Patient's Reason for Encounter in Primary Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Context Knowledge of incidence, prevalence and trends in morbidity support the diagnostic process of general practitioners (GPs). GPs use estimated probabilities of probable diagnoses to guide their policy on testing and referral. However, GPs estimations often are implicit and imprecise. The International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) has the potential to incorporate the doctor and patient's perspective within a clinical encounter. The patient perspective is reflected in the Reason for encounter (RFE) which is the 'literal uttered reason' of the patient to contact the GP and comprises the patient's priority for seeking care. Previous research showed the predictive value of some RFEs in diagnosing cancer. Objective Our aim is to analyze the predictive value of the RFE for the final diagnosis, taking into account patient's age and sex. Study Design and Analysis In this cohort study, we determined the relationship between RFE, age, sex and the final diagnosis with multilevel analysis and distribution analysis. We focused on the top 10 most common RFEs. Dataset FaMe-Net database, containing coded routine health data from GP registration network (7 GP practices; 40.000 patients). GPs code the RFE and diagnosis of all contacts with patients, using the ICPC-2 within an episode of care (EoC) structure. An EoC is defined as a health problem in an individual from the first encounter until completion in the last encounter. Population Studied We used data from 1989-2020 and selected all patients with a RFE in the top 10 most common RFEs and the corresponding final diagnoses. Outcome Measures The predictive value is shown in odds risk and frequencies. Results We included 162,315 contacts from 37,194 patients. Multilevel analysis showed significant impact of the additional RFE on the final diagnosis (p<0.05). For example, patients presenting with RFE cough had a 5.6% chance of pneumonia, while it rose to 16.4%, when cough and fever were mentioned as RFE. Age and sex were also of significant impact on the final diagnosis(p<0.05), except for sex in case of fever(p 0.332) and throat symptoms(p 0.616). Conclusions Additional RFE, age and sex are of significant impact on the final diagnosis. Other patient factors might also have relevant predictive value. Artificial intelligence can be beneficial to add more variables to build a diagnostic prediction model. This model can support GPs in the diagnostic process and can help students and residents in training.