Primary Care Physicians Research Articles

Patterns and correlates of traumatic stress, depression, anxiety, and moral injury in U.S. health care providers late in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Providing health care during the COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with a high mental health burden for health care providers. This study examined patterns of responses and correlates of class membership across commonly assessed mental health symptoms, psychosocial functioning, and moral injury for providers in the United States in Fall 2022. A convenience sample of 1,504 primary care physicians, pediatricians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants who had been in practice for three or more years (Mage = 46.1 years, SDage = 11.3, 58% male) completed self-report measures in an online, opt-in panel survey from September to November 2022. Using latent class analysis, three classes were identified: No/Low Symptoms (64.8%), High Moral Injury (19.9%), and Elevated Symptoms (15.2%). Several factors were correlated with class membership including age, sex, social support, personal risk of COVID-19, pandemic-related work stressors, proportion of COVID-19 patients seen at the height of the pandemic, and death of a patient due to COVID-19. This study found high levels of mental health symptoms, and problems with psychosocial functioning and moral injury in health care providers well past the pandemic's peak. The results also demonstrated the importance of considering the unique contribution of moral injury to psychosocial functional difficulties experienced by health care providers during the pandemic given their defined role as essential workers. These findings have implications for preventing and managing mental health problems and burnout among providers postpandemic as well as for future pandemics at both the organizational and individual levels. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

The Relationship of Chronic Disease Burden and Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Depression Treatment.

Chronic disease and depression are closely related, and depression, if left untreated, can worsen physical disease symptoms. Furthermore, treating depression can improve patient outcomes. Generally, treatment for depression is lower in minority groups. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between chronic disease burden and depression treatment and whether that relationship differs between white to non-white patient visits to primary care physicians. We conducted a quantitative secondary data analysis using data from 2014-2019 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS). Visits by adults with depression to primary care physicians (n = 3832). Logistic regressions estimated the odds of medication treatment, mental health counseling treatment, and any treatment. Visits by patients with 3 or more chronic conditions had 1.39 times the odds of receiving medication treatment (p-value = 0.06). However, when examining treatment by race, visits by white patients with 1-2 chronic conditions had 3.04 times the odds of receiving mental health treatment (p-value = 0.09) compared to visits by non-white patients and 2.09 times the odds of receiving any treatment (p-value = 0.08) compared to visits by non-white patients. Although not significant at the p < .05 level, the results suggest that the odds of depression treatment is greater during visits by patients with multiple co-occurring chronic conditions compared to visits by people without chronic conditions. It appears that this effect is larger for visits by white patients compared to visits by non-white patients. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine how this association impacts minorities distinctly and what could be the reason behind the disparity. These findings could help physicians be aware of ongoing disparities in depression treatment and provide more equitable depression treatment.

Pre-implementation planning for a sepsis intervention in a large learning health system: a qualitative study

BackgroundSepsis survivors experience high morbidity and mortality. Though recommended best practices have been established to address the transition and early post hospital needs and promote recovery for sepsis survivors, few patients receive recommended post-sepsis care. Our team developed the Sepsis Transition and Recovery (STAR) program, a multicomponent transition intervention that leverages virtually-connected nurses to coordinate the application of evidence-based recommendations for post-sepsis care with additional clinical support from hospitalist and primary care physicians. In this paper, we present findings from a qualitative pre-implementation study, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), of factors to inform successful STAR implementation at a large learning health system prior to effectiveness testing as part of a Type I Hybrid trial.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews (n = 16) with 8 administrative leaders and 8 clinicians. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed in ATLAS.ti using a combination deductive/inductive strategy based on CFIR domains and constructs and the Constant Comparison Method.ResultsSix facilitators and five implementation barriers were identified spanning all five CFIR domains (Intervention Characteristics, Outer Setting, Inner Setting, Characteristics of Individuals and Process). Facilitators of STAR included alignment with health system goals, fostering stakeholder engagement, sharing STAR outcomes data, good communication between STAR navigators and patient care teams/PCPs, clinician promotion of STAR with patients, and good rapport and effective communication between STAR navigators and patients, caregivers, and family members. Barriers of STAR included competing demands for staff time and resources, insufficient communication and education of STAR’s value and effectiveness, underlying informational and technology gaps among patients, lack of patient access to community resources, and patient distrust of the program and/or health care.ConclusionsCFIR proved to be a robust framework for examining facilitators and barriers for pre-implementation planning of post-sepsis care programs within diverse hospital and community settings in a large LHS. Conducting a structured pre-implementation evaluation helps researchers design with implementation in mind prior to effectiveness studies and should be considered a key component of Type I hybrid trials when feasible.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT04495946. Registered August 3, 2020.

Evaluation of the post-COVID multidisciplinary outpatient clinic at the Pulmonary Division of the Cantonal Hospital Winterthur from the patient's perspective: a mixed-methods study.

This prospective study, conducted with patients from the multidisciplinary post-COVID outpatient clinic at the Pulmonary Division of the Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, aimed to investigate changes in patients' main symptoms, elements that aided in coping with the condition and satisfaction with the consulting and therapeutic interventions. After obtaining ethical approval, fifty patients were consecutively included in this longitudinal study, which incorporated three survey times post-consultation: t1 (0-7 days), t2 (4-8 weeks) and t3 (4-6 months). The survey comprised standardised questionnaires, including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status scale and the Chalder Fatigue scale, along with study-specific questions regarding symptoms and reasons for consulting the post-COVID outpatient clinic. Additionally, ten patients were invited to participate in qualitative individual interviews at t2 and t3. The study was conducted between November 2021 and February 2023. The median age of the 50 participants was 47 years (IQR: 36-55), with 66% (33/50) being female. Most participants (66% or 33/50) reported no pre-existing conditions prior to COVID-19 infection, and only six patients required hospitalisation during the acute phase of their infection. Visits to the multidisciplinary post-COVID clinic occurred approximately eight months post-infection, with referrals primarily made by primary care physicians (82% or 41/50). The majority of patients experienced persistent tiredness, exhaustion and fatigue (94% or 47/50), along with reduced physical performance (82% or 41/50), while pain or breathing difficulties were less frequently mentioned. At t1, around half of the patients were fully or partially unable to work, a proportion that reduced to around a third by t3. Symptoms generally decreased over time, with significant improvements observed between t2 and t3. However, subjectively perceived cognitive limitations worsened or were reported more frequently over time. Most patients (96% or 48/50) felt well cared for throughout their consultations. In qualitative interviews, patients highlighted the medical staff's attentiveness and the time dedicated to consultations, which made them feel that their complaints were taken seriously and that they received appropriate information. The results confirmed that the multidisciplinary post-COVID outpatient clinic met most respondents' expectations. Patients found that the attentive interprofessional coaching was most helpful in coping with their illness. However, participants also noted long waiting times and expressed a desire for earlier admission to the clinic.

Relationship between continuity of primary care and hospitalisation for patients with COPD: population-based cohort study from South Korea

ObjectivesThe existing evidence for the impacts of continuity of care (COC) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is low to moderate. This study aimed to investigate the associations...

Prevalence of Lifestyle Factors Among Primary Care Physicians: A Cross-Sectional Study in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.

Introduction The importance of a healthy lifestyle has grown in significance on a global scale, as it offers a vital means of preventing and managing a range of related illnesses. Consequently, maintaining a healthy lifestyle is of paramount importance for the prevention and management of non-communicable diseases. The lifestyle behaviors of healthcare workers exert a significant influence on their attitudes and counseling methods, as they play a pivotal role in the promotion of health and the dissemination of lifestyle education to patients and the general population. Objective The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of lifestyle factors among primary care physicians in Al-Ahsa Governorate, including smoking, body mass index, nutrition, physical activity, and caffeine consumption. Methods The study was conducted between December 2023 and February 2024. A total of 233 primary care physicians in Al-Ahsa were selected through a probability multistage clustering sampling method. Data were collected via the distribution of a self-administered questionnaire to the primary care physicians and were analyzed using the chi-square test. Results A greater proportion of primary care physicians exhibited multiple unhealthy lifestyle factors (166/233, 71.2%). The most prevalent lifestyle factor was low physical activity (169/233, 73%), followed by poor nutrition (121/233, 52%), obesity (120/233, 51.51%), smoking (37/233, 15.88%), and caffeine consumption (22/233, 9%). The majority of primary care physicians with optimal health status are employed in primary healthcare (PHC) facilities situated in the eastern region followed by the southern region in Al-Ahsa Governorate. Conclusion The study findings revealed a prevalence of unhealthy lifestyle factors among the majority of primary care physicians in the Al-Ahsa Governorate. The most prevalent unhealthy lifestyle factor among the participants was low physical activity.

Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids: A Nationwide Survey Study to Understand Perspectives in Primary Care.

The expansion of over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids has raised inquiries regarding primary care physicians' (PCP) knowledge, perspective, and perceived roles. We aimed to understand PCP perspectives on OTC hearing aids via nationwide online surveys. RedCap survey was distributed to PCPs via online forums and public mailing lists. Outcomes included PCPs' attitudes toward, perceived role surrounding, confidence managing, and knowledge of OTC hearing aids. Regression analyses were performed to identify associated factors including demographics and practice characteristics. Cohort included 111 PCPs primarily working in non-rural (83.8%) outpatient academic medical centers (47.5%), with a mean (SD) of 16.9 (11.6) years practicing. Most reported unfamiliarity (61.3%) with OTC hearing aids but viewed them positively (91.9%). They often perceived themselves as poor sources of OTC hearing aid information (63.1%) but desired involvement (90.1%) and believed associated knowledge is important (98.2%). Rural practice environment was associated with less familiarity toward OTC hearing aids (β = -0.72, [95% CI -1.40 to -0.04]). Respondents answered 5.0 (2.4) of 10 OTC hearing aid knowledge questions correctly. Using 5-point Likert scale, participants reported most confidence recognizing signs/symptoms of hearing loss 3.71 (0.84), but less confidence educating 1.68 (0.96) about and determining candidacy 1.72 (1.05) for OTC hearing aids. Participants reported continuing medical education courses and published guidelines would effectively improve their OTC hearing aid knowledge. PCPs displayed positive attitudes toward OTC hearing aids and valued involvement. Addressing unfamiliarity/knowledge gaps surrounding OTC hearing aids through courses and published guidelines may help clarify misconceptions and promote hearing health care. NA Laryngoscope, 2024.

Physician EHR Time and Visit Volume Following Adoption of Team-Based Documentation Support

Physicians spend the plurality of active electronic health record (EHR) time on documentation. Excessive documentation limits time spent with patients and is associated with burnout. Organizations need effective strategies to reduce physician documentation burden; however, evidence on team-based documentation (eg, medical scribes) has been limited to small, single-institution studies lacking rigorous estimates of how documentation support changes EHR time and visit volume. To analyze how EHR documentation time and visit volume change following the adoption of team-based documentation approaches. This national longitudinal cohort study analyzed physician-week EHR metadata from September 2020 through April 2021. A 2-way fixed-effects difference-in-differences regression approach was used to analyze changes in the main outcomes after team-based documentation support adoption. Event study regression models were used to examine variation in changes over time and stratified models to analyze the moderating role of support intensity. The sample included US ambulatory physicians using the EHR. Data were analyzed between October 2022 and September 2023. Team-based documentation support, defined as new onset and consistent use of coauthored documentation with another clinical team member. The main outcomes included weekly visit volume, EHR documentation time, total EHR time, and EHR time outside clinic hours. Of 18 265 physicians, 1024 physicians adopted team-based documentation support, with 17 241 comparison physicians who did not adopt such support. The sample included 57.2% primary care physicians, 31.6% medical specialists, and 11.2% surgical specialists; 40.0% practiced in academic settings and 18.4% in outpatient safety-net settings. For adopter physicians, visit volume increased by 6.0% (2.5 visits/wk [95% CI, 1.9-3.0]; P < .001), and documentation time decreased by 9.1% (23.3 min/wk [95% CI, -30.3 to -16.2]; P < .001). Following a 20-week postadoption learning period, visits per week increased by 10.8% and documentation time decreased by 16.2%. Only high-intensity adopters (>40% of note text authored by others) realized reductions in documentation time, both for the full postadoption period (-53.9 min/wk [95% CI, -65.3 to -42.4]; 21.0% decrease; P < .001) and following the learning period (-72.2 min/wk; 28.1% decrease). Low adopters saw no meaningful change in EHR time but realized a similar increase in visit volume. In this national longitudinal cohort study, physicians who adopted team-based documentation experienced increased visit volume and reduced documentation and EHR time, especially after a learning period.

Influence path of work-family conflict on primary care physicians' resignation intention: Data from a Chinese cross-sectional survey.

Primary care physicians and their teams are the leading force in constructing primary medical services, undertaking the critical responsibility of residents' essential health, and also related to realizing the national health goal. However, primary care physicians generally have a high turnover rate due to problems such as high work pressure, low salary levels, and limited career development. Therefore, exploring primary care physicians' resignation intentions plays a vital role in promoting the construction of primary care physicians' health service system. This study explores the factors influencing the resignation intentions of primary care physicians, specifically examining the roles of work-family conflict, job satisfaction, professional identity, and emotional exhaustion. By understanding these dynamics, the research aims to inform strategies that can enhance the stability and effectiveness of primary care services, ultimately contributing to the improvement of public health infrastructure and achieving national health goals. This investigation will utilize structural equation modeling to analyze the interrelationships among the identified variables, thereby providing a comprehensive framework for addressing the high turnover rates among primary care physicians. This study uses the work-family conflict, job satisfaction, professional identity, and emotional exhaustion scales. The data comes from a cross-sectional survey in Zhejiang Province, China, in 2022. Using SPSS 27 and Mplus8.3 software to analyze 1205 primary care physicians and their team members, the selected cases all answered the relevant questions of resignation intention. The potential relationship among work-family conflict, job satisfaction, professional identity, emotional exhaustion, and family doctor resignation intention was explored by constructing structural equations. Work-family conflict can directly and positively affect primary care physicians' resignation intention (β = -0.546, p < 0.001). The results of the mediation model found that job satisfaction, professional identity, and emotional exhaustion were significantly related to work-family conflict, and primary care physicians' resignation intention has a significant mediating effect. It mainly includes six intermediary approaches: one is through the independent intermediary effect of job satisfaction; the second is through the independent intermediary effect of professional identity; the third is through the chain intermediary effect between Job satisfaction and professional identity; the fourth is through the intermediary effect of Job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion chain intermediary; fifth is through the chain intermediary of professional identity and emotional exhaustion; sixth is through the complex chain intermediary of job satisfaction, professional identity, and emotional exhaustion. Primary care physicians have a high score in resignation intention, which deserves continuous attention. Relevant department can help primary care physicians balance work and family roles, provide them with appropriate resources and rewards, as well as a good working environment and career development opportunities, to improve their job satisfaction and professional identity and reduce emotional exhaustion, thereby reducing the risk of resignation intention.

Physicians’ Self-Reported Knowledge and Behaviors Related to Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain and Diagnosing Opioid Use Disorder, DocStyles, 2020

IntroductionIn 2016, CDC released the Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain (2016 CDC Guideline) to improve opioid prescribing while minimizing associated risks. This analysis sought to understand guideline-concordant knowledge and self-reported practices among primary care physicians (PCPs). MethodsData from Spring DocStyles 2020, a cross-sectional, web-based survey of practicing U.S. physicians was analyzed in 2022 and 2023. Demographic, knowledge, and practice characteristics of PCPs overall (N=1,007) and among specific subsets 1) PCPs who provided care for patients with chronic pain (n=600), 2) PCPs that did not provide care for patients with chronic pain (n=337), and 3) PCPs who reported not obtaining or seeking a buprenorphine waiver (n=624) were examined. ResultsA majority of physicians (72.6%) were unable to select a series of options consistent with diagnostic criteria for opioid use disorder (OUD); of those physicians, almost half (47.9%) reported treating at least one patient with medications for OUD. A minority of physicians (17.5%) reported having a buprenorphine prescribing waiver. Among physicians who prescribed opioids for chronic pain (88.5%), 54.4% concurrently prescribed benzodiazepines. About one-third (33.5%) reported not taking patients with chronic pain. ConclusionsThere were critical practice gaps among PCPs related to 2016 CDC Guideline topics. Increasing knowledge of CDC's opioid prescribing recommendations can benefit physician practice, patient outcomes, and public health strategies in addressing the opioid overdose crisis and implementing safer and more effective pain care.

Diagnosis journey for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a qualitative study

ObjectiveThe objective is to explore the journey to diagnosis and referral pathway from the onset of symptoms to the initial assessments at paediatric rheumatology (PR) centres, based on the experience...

Has cross-level clinical coordination changed in the context of the pandemic? The case of the Catalan health system

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic triggered numerous changes in health services organisation, whose effects on clinical coordination are unknown. The aim is to analyse changes in the experience and perception of cross-level clinical coordination and related factors of primary (PC) and secondary care (SC) doctors in the Catalan health system between 2017 and 2022.MethodsComparison of two cross-sectional studies based on online surveys by means of the self-administration of the COORDENA-CAT (2017) and COORDENA-TICs (2022) questionnaires to PC and SC doctors. Final sample n = 3308 in 2017 and n = 2277 in 2022. Outcome variables: experience of cross-level information and clinical management coordination and perception of cross-level clinical coordination in the healthcare area and related factors. Stratification variables: level of care and year. Adjusting variables: sex, years of experience, type of specialty, type of hospital, type of management of PC/SC. Descriptive bivariate and multivariate analysis using Poisson regressions models to detect changes between years in total and by levels of care.ResultsCompared with 2017, while cross-level clinical information coordination remained relatively high, with a slight improvement, doctors of both care levels reported a worse experience of cross-level clinical management coordination, particularly of care consistency (repetition of test) and accessibility to PC and, of general perception, which was worse in SC doctors. There was also a worsening in organisational (institutional support, set objectives, time available for coordination), attitudinal (job satisfaction) and interactional factors (knowledge between doctors). The use of ICT-based coordination mechanisms such as shared electronic medical records and electronic consultations between PC and SC increased, while the participation in virtual joint clinical conferences was limited.ConclusionsResults show a slight improvement in clinical information but also less expected setbacks in some dimensions of clinical management coordination and in the perception of clinical coordination, suggesting that the increased use of some ICT-based coordination mechanisms did not counteract the effect of the worsened organisational, interactional, and attitudinal factors during the pandemic. Strategies are needed to facilitate direct communication, to improve conditions for the effective use of mechanisms and policies to protect healthcare professionals and services in order to better cope with new crises.

Hypertension Prevalence, Treatment, and Control 90 Days After Acute Stroke Among Mexican American and Non-Hispanic White Adults.

High blood pressure (BP) increases recurrent stroke risk. We assessed hypertension prevalence, treatment, control, medication adherence, and predictors of uncontrolled BP 90 days after ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke among 561 Mexican American and non-Hispanic White (NHW) survivors of stroke from the BASIC (Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi) cohort from 2011 to 2014. Uncontrolled BP was defined as average BP ≥140/90 mm Hg at 90 days poststroke. Hypertension was uncontrolled BP or antihypertensive medication prescribed or hypertension history. Treatment was antihypertensive use. Adherence was missing zero antihypertensive doses per week. We investigated predictors of uncontrolled BP using logistic regression adjusting for patient factors. Median (interquartile range) age was 68 (59-78) years, 64% were Mexican American, and 90% of strokes were ischemic. Overall, 94.3% of survivors of stroke had hypertension (95.6% Mexican American versus 92.0% non-Hispanic White; P=0.09). Of these, 87.9% were treated (87.3% Mexican American versus 89.1% non-Hispanic White; P=0.54). Among the total population, 38.3% (95% CI, 34.4%-42.4%) had uncontrolled BP. Among those with uncontrolled BP prescribed an antihypertensive, 84.5% reported treatment adherence (95% CI, 78.8%-89.3%). Uncontrolled BP 90 days poststroke was less likely in patients with stroke who had a primary care physician (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.45 [95% CI, 0.24-0.83]; P=0.01), greater stroke severity (aOR per-1-point-higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.99]; P=0.02), or more depressive symptoms (aOR per-1-point-higher Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale-8 score, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92-0.99] among those with a history of hypertension at baseline; P=0.009). Greater than one third of survivors of stroke have uncontrolled BP at 90 days poststroke in this population-based study. Interventions are needed to improve BP control after stroke.

Diagnosis of wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy by primary care physicians in Saint Petersburg. Literature review and clinical case

Diagnosis of wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy by primary care physicians in Saint Petersburg. Literature review and clinical case

An increasing number of states filled Conrad 30 waivers for recruiting international medical graduates.

To address physician shortages in the United States, Congress created the Conrad 30 visa waiver program allowing non-citizen international medical graduates to obtain visas to practice medicine in underserved areas. There is little information on whether states have effectively used the program. To fill the gap, we examined the growth and distribution of Conrad physicians between 2001 and 2020. We found that the number of states filling all of their annual allocated Conrad slots increased over the last two decades, yet one-half of the states still did not fill their allowed slots in 2020. Our analysis also revealed substantial variations across states in the number of Conrad physicians by specialty (eg, primary care physicians and psychiatrists), geography (eg, rural vs urban areas and physician shortage vs non-shortage areas). Our findings suggest that states can better use the Conrad program to meet healthcare needs across specialties and geographic areas.

Exploring the Challenges of Recruiting Older People for a Randomised Trial Assessing the Feasibility of Treating White Coat Hypertension in the UK General Practices: A Mixed-methods study.

There is a recognised association between white coat hypertension (WCH) and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in older adults. However, there is no consensus on the management of WCH in this group. The objective of the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET-2) study was to assess the feasibility of randomising 100 patients > 75years with WCH from General Practice in the UK to treatment or usual care. The study did not randomise any patients. In this follow-up study, we sought to explore the reasons for not recruiting. Furthermore, using a mixed-methods study design, staff from 29 General Practice (GP) sites and the Clinical Research Network (CRN) in Kent, Surrey, and Sussex (KSS), UK, were sent an online questionnaire about local research facilities and infrastructure, and HYVET-2 study methodology and target population demographics. Nineteen (19) individuals responded to the online questionnaires (15 primary care staff, 4 CRN staff). Moreover, using a framework approach, we identified six themes summarising challenges to HYVET-2 recruitment. These themes are established approaches of primary care towards managing WCH in older people, target patient demographics, study design complexity, patient- facing study documents, limited research resources in primary care, and identification of eligible patients using existing coding. Our experience showed that recruiting older people from primary care to a WCH study was not feasible. A national scoping survey amongst primary care physicians in the UK, as well as robust patient and public involvement (PPI) targeting older people with WCH, might improve recruitment in future studies addressing the management of WCH in older people.

Primary care physicians’ experiences of video and online chat consultations: a qualitative descriptive study

Objectives To explore the perceptions and views of remote consultations and patient care of primary care physicians (PCPs) who work remotely regularly and have experience performing remote consultations. Design A qualitative study using thematic analysis. Setting Four online focus group interviews with 17 PCPs, working with one private health care provider, with public and private primary care patients. Subjects PCPs who had performed video or online chat consultations with primary care patients for at least 6 months. Main outcome measurements PCPs’ perceptions and views working remotely in online chat and video consultations. Results Two main themes describing how PCPs perceived remote consultations emerged: 1) remote consultations have an impact on the way physicians work, and 2) remote consultations have an impact on the service system and patients. The subthemes of the first main theme included the physicians’ new way of working, impacts on physicians’ well-being, and impacts on communication and physician competences. The subthemes for the second main theme were the importance of smoothness of services for the patients, patient suitability, and technical liabilities. Conclusion Remote consultations provide PCPs with a new way of working that could improve work-life balance. However, it is important to maintain sufficient clinical competence through versatile work. Digital consultations can make contacting healthcare smoother and easier for patients if the patient selection is performed carefully. Online chat seems suitable for singular contacts and simple issues, but remote consultations could be used to sustain continuity of care.

More doctors, better health? A generalised synthetic control approach to estimating impacts of increasing doctors under Brazil's Mais Medicos programme

Worldwide, there are an insufficient number of primary care physicians to provide accessible, high-quality primary care services. Better knowledge on the health impacts of policies aimed at improving access to primary care physicians is important for informing future policies.Using a generalised synthetic control estimator (GSC), we estimate the effect of the increase in primary care physicians from the Programa Mais Médicos in Brazil. The GSC allows us to estimates a continuous treatment effects which are heterogenous by region. We exploit the variation in physicians allocated to each Brazilian microregion to identify the impact of an increasing Mais Médicos primary care physicians. We explore hospitalisations and mortality rates (both total and from ambulatory care sensitive conditions) as outcomes. Our analysis differs from previous work by estimating the impact of the increase in physician numbers, as opposed to the overall impact of programme participation. We examine the impact on hospitalisations and mortality rates and employ a panel dataset with monthly observations of all Brazilian microregion over the period 2008–2017.We find limited effects of an increase in primary care physicians impacting health outcomes - with no significant impact of the Programa Mais Médicos on hospitalisations or mortality rates. Potential explanations include substitution of other health professionals, impacts materialising over the longer-term, and poor within-region allocation of Mais Médicos physicians.

Metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD): assessing the knowledge and practice of primary care doctors in Seremban District, Negeri Sembilan.

Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is the liver manifestation of metabolic syndrome, which is commonly seen in primary care settings. This study aimed to determine the knowledge and practice of primary care physicians regarding MAFLD in Seremban District, Negeri Sembilan. This cross-sectional study was conducted among medical officers in 14 health clinics in Seremban District, using a validated, self-administered online questionnaire. A total of 240 medical officers from 14 health clinics in Seremban District, participated in this study. Most participants (85.4%) passed the knowledge test. Their practice was acceptable, but only a minority were familiar with non-invasive testing of liver fibrosis (e.g. APRI or FIB-4), medication and specific diet for the treatment of MAFLD. Most primary care physicians in Seremban District are knowledgeable in identifying risk factors and managing patients with MAFLD. However, there are still areas to improve in terms of management, particularly regarding the use of silymarin, vitamin E and pioglitazone.

Diabetes Management Based on the Phenotype and Stage of the Disease: An Expert Proposal from the AGORA Diabetes Collaborative Group.

Diabetes is a complex and rapidly growing disease with heterogeneous clinical presentations. Recent advances in molecular and genetic technologies have led to the identification of various subtypes of diabetes. These advancements offer the potential for a more precise, individualized approach to treatment, known as precision medicine. Recognizing high-risk phenotypes and intervening early and intensively is crucial. A staging system for type 1 diabetes has been proposed and accepted globally. In this article, we will explore the different methods for categorizing and classifying type 2 diabetes (T2D) based on clinical characteristics, progression patterns, risk of complications, and the use of molecular techniques for patient grouping. We, as a team of experts, will also present an easy-to-follow treatment plan and guidance for non-specialists, particularly primary care physicians, that integrates the classification and staging of diabetes. This will help ensure that the most suitable therapy is applied to the different types of T2D at each stage of the disease's progression.