Primary Care Community Health Centers Research Articles

Perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare providers toward interprofessional collaboration in chronic disease management in Hue, Vietnam

ABSTRACT In Vietnam, each primary care community health center (CHC) consists of a multi-professional team with six disciplines, including a physician, assistant physician, nurse, pharmacist, midwife, and Vietnamese traditional physician, who are able to meet the majority of patient’s needs at the primary care level. How they collaborate, especially in chronic disease management (CDM), is still limited described in the literature. This study aims to gain insight into the perceptions and the experiences of primary health care providers (PHCPs) toward interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in CDM in CHCs in (Hue) Vietnam. A qualitative study of descriptive phenomenology was performed using two focus groups and 15 semi-structured interviews with PHCPs from six professions relevant to CDM in CHCs. The data were analyzed using NVivo 12.0 with a thematic analysis method by a multiprofessional research team. From the analysis, the data were classified into three main themes: “lack of collaborative practice,” “knowledge,” and “facilitators and barriers to IPC.” This study provided evidence of the awareness that actual collaboration in daily care is fragmentarily organized and that PHCPs try to finish their tasks within their profession. PHCPs work multiprofessionally and lack shared decision-making in patient-centered care. There is a need to develop an interprofessional education program and training to address these deficiencies in the Vietnamese context to improve interprofessional collaboration in health care.

Patient-Reported Social Risks and Clinician Decision Making: Results of a Clinician Survey in Primary Care Community Health Centers.

To assess the extent that patients' social determinants of health (SDOH) influence safety-net primary care clinicians' decisions at the point of care; examine how that information comes to the clinician's attention; and analyze clinician, patient, and encounter characteristics associated with the use of SDOH data in clinical decision making. Thirty-eight clinicians working in 21 clinics were prompted to complete 2 short card surveys embedded in the electronic health record (EHR) daily for 3 weeks. Survey data were matched with clinician-, encounter-, and patient-level variables from the EHR. Descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equation models were used to assess relationships between the variables and the clinician reported use of SDOH data to inform care. Social determinants of health were reported to influence care in 35% of surveyed encounters. The most common sources of information on patients' SDOH were conversations with patients (76%), prior knowledge (64%), and the EHR (46%). Social determinants of health were significantly more likely to influence care among male and non-English-speaking patients, and those with discrete SDOH screening data documented in the EHR. Electronic health records present an opportunity to support clinicians integrating information about patients' social and economic circumstances into care planning. Study findings suggest that SDOH information from standardized screening documented in the EHR, combined with patient-clinician conversations, may enable social risk-adjusted care. Electronic health record tools and clinic workflows could be used to support both documentation and conversations. Study results also identified factors that may cue clinicians to include SDOH information in point-of-care decision-making. Future research should explore this topic further.

Group Acupuncture Therapy With Yoga Therapy for Chronic Neck, Low Back, and Osteoarthritis Pain in Safety Net Settings for an Underserved Population: A Feasibility Pilot Study.

Acupuncture and yoga have both been shown to be effective in chronic pain. Underrepresented populations have poorer pain outcomes with less access to effective pain care. To assess the feasibility of bundling group acupuncture with yoga therapy for chronic neck, back or osteoarthritis pain in safety net settings. This was a feasibility pilot in Bronx and Harlem primary care community health centers. Participants with chronic neck, back or osteoarthritis pain received acupuncture and yoga therapy over a 10-week period. Participants received 10weekly acupuncture treatments in group setting; with Yoga therapy sessions beginning immediately following the 3rd session. Primary outcome was pain interference and pain intensity on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI); Outcomes were measured at baseline, 10-week close of intervention, and 24-week follow-up. 93 patients were determined to be eligible and completed the baseline interview. The majority of participants were non-White and Medicaid recipients. 78 (84%) completed the intervention and 10-week survey, and 58 (62%) completed the 24-week post intervention survey. Participants received an average number of 6.5 acupuncture sessions (out of a possible 10), and 4 yoga sessions (out of a possible 8) over the 10-week intervention. Patients showed statistically significant improvements in pain at the close of the intervention and at a somewhat lesser rate, at 24-weeks post intervention. Challenges included telephone outreach and site coordination integrating acupuncture with yoga therapy. The trial also had to be stopped early due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Bundling acupuncture therapy and yoga therapy is feasible for an underrepresented population with chronic pain in urban community health centers with preliminary indications of acceptability and benefit to participants.

Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion and access to primary-care based smoking cessation assistance among cancer survivors: an observational cohort study

BackgroundSmoking among cancer survivors can increase the risk of cancer reoccurrence, reduce treatment effectiveness and decrease quality of life. Cancer survivors without health insurance have higher rates of smoking and decreased probability of quitting smoking than cancer survivors with health insurance. This study examines the associations of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid insurance expansion with smoking cessation assistance and quitting smoking among cancer survivors seen in community health centers (CHCs).MethodsUsing electronic health record data from 337 primary care community health centers in 12 states that expanded Medicaid eligibility and 273 CHCs in 8 states that did not expand, we identified adult cancer survivors with a smoking status indicating current smoking within 6 months prior to ACA expansion in 2014 and ≥ 1 visit with smoking status assessed within 24-months post-expansion. Using an observational cohort propensity score weighted approach and logistic generalized estimating equation regression, we compared odds of quitting smoking, having a cessation medication ordered, and having ≥6 visits within the post-expansion period among cancer survivors in Medicaid expansion versus non-expansion states.ResultsCancer survivors in expansion states had higher odds of having a smoking cessation medication order (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.54, 95%CI = 1.61-4.03) and higher odds of having ≥6 office visits than those in non-expansion states (aOR = 1.82, 95%CI = 1.22-2.73). Odds of quitting smoking did not differ significantly between patients in Medicaid expansion versus non-expansion states.ConclusionsThe increased odds of having a smoking cessation medication order among cancer survivors seen in Medicaid expansion states compared with those seen in non-expansion states provides evidence of the importance of health insurance coverage in accessing evidence-based tobacco treatment within CHCs. Continued research is needed to understand why, despite increased odds of having a cessation medication prescribed, odds of quitting smoking were not significantly higher among cancer survivors in Medicaid expansion states compared to non-expansion states.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Acute Care Use for Pediatric Asthma.

Previous work has shown that asthma-related emergency department (ED) use is greatest among Black and Latine populations, but it is unknown whether health care use for exacerbations differs across settings (outpatient, ED, inpatient) and correlates with use of routine outpatient services. We aimed to measure disparities by race, ethnicity, and language in pediatric acute asthma care using data from US primary care community health centers. In an observational study using electronic health records from community health centers in 18 states, we compared non-Hispanic Black, English-preferring Latine, Spanish-preferring Latine, and non-Hispanic White children aged 3 to 17 years on visits for clinic-coded asthma exacerbations (2012-2018). We further evaluated asthma-related ED use and inpatient admissions in a subsample of Oregon-Medicaid recipients. Covariate-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and rate ratios (RRs) were derived using logistic or negative binomial regression analysis with generalized estimating equations. Among 41,276 children with asthma, Spanish-preferring Latine children had higher odds of clinic visits for asthma exacerbation than non-Hispanic White peers (OR = 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.18). Among the subsample of 6,555 children insured under Oregon-Medicaid, non-Hispanic Black children had higher odds and rates of asthma-related ED use than non-Hispanic White peers (OR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.04-1.89 and RR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.09-2.04, respectively). We observed no differences between groups in asthma-related inpatient admissions. This study is the first to show that patterns of clinic and ED acute-care use differ for non-Hispanic Black and Spanish-preferring Latine children when compared with non-Hispanic White peers. Non-Hispanic Black children had lower use of clinics, whereas Spanish-preferring Latine children had higher use, including for acute exacerbations. These patterns of clinic use were accompanied by higher ED use among Black children. Ensuring adequate care in clinics may be important in mitigating disparities in asthma outcomes.VISUAL ABSTRACT.

Comparison of hepatitis C treatment outcomes between primary care and specialty care.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections have increased significantly in the United States recently, having tripled by 2014. Seventy-five percent of those with HCV are aging baby boomers, which places increased pressure on the medical system to provide treatment. There are not enough specialists available to treat everyone infected with HCV. The aim of this research was to determine whether treatment of hepatitis C with new direct-acting antivirals in primary care settings resulted in equivalent cure rates when compared with those patients treated by specialists. A retrospective cohort design was used. Participants were those treated for hepatitis C in specialty care at large public hospitals by gastroenterologists and/or hepatologists and those treated in two primary care community health centers in Seattle. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine differences of sustained virologic response between those treated in primary care and those treated in specialty care. Treatment failure and those lost to follow-up were combined into one category. Failure rates were only 4% in primary care and 1.1% in specialty care. After adjustment, patients treated in primary care were statistically significantly less likely to have failure/lost to follow-up than those treated in specialty care. Hepatitis C treatment can be successfully provided in primary care with equivalent treatment outcomes. Primary care advanced practice nurses are in a good position to identify and treat hepatitis C. In addition, as patients are typically more engaged with their primary care provider, follow-up rates may be better versus referring these patients to a specialty provider.

Abstract A029: Promising effects of a culturally tailored multilevel pilot intervention to increase HPV vaccination uptake among Asian American female and male adolescents

Abstract Background: HPV vaccination is recommended for female and male adolescents in the U.S. to prevent HPV-related cancer, yet the uptake remains suboptimal nationwide. Compared with other racial/ethnic groups, Asian American adolescents have the lowest HPV vaccination rates. Successful HPV vaccine depends heavily on parents' attitudes, perceptions, and willingness to have their adolescents vaccinated. Objective: This pilot study aimed to examine the intervention effect on the primary outcome of a provider-based, culturally tailored, multilevel intervention to promote HPV vaccination. Method: A total of 180 parents (110 for intervention group and 70 for control group) with 290 adolescents aged 11 to 18 (170 for intervention group, 120 for control group) were recruited from primary care community health centers in Philadelphia and NYC from 2015 to 2017. Specifically, we compared the uptake of first shot of HPV vaccination at the 6-month post-intervention assessment and completion rate of three shots. Results: The uptake of at least 1 shot of HPV vaccine was significantly higher among the intervention group (76.36%) than the control (10.00%). The difference between intervention and control group remained statistically significant (odds ratio = .38.47, 95% 13.99 - 105.80) even when we controlled for demographics and health-related covariates, lending support to the significant and strong effects of our intervention on vaccination uptake. Conclusion: Our finding indicates that provider-based, culturally tailored, multilevel intervention showed promising effect of HPV vaccination uptake among Asian American adolescents. Greater effort and measures are needed for broader implementation of such intervention. Future research is also necessary to explore the application to ethnic minority populations to prevent cancer and reduce health disparities. Acknowledgement: This project was supported by National Outreach Network (NON) - Community Health Educator (CHE) supplement grant funded by Center for Reduce Cancer Health Disparities (CRCHD)-National Cancer Institute (NCI) (Grant Number: U54CA153513; PI: Grace X. Ma, PhD). The authors wish to thank clinical collaborator Chinatown Medical Services (CMS) and their staff for their support and collaboration. Citation Format: Grace X. Ma, Shumenghui Zhai, Lin Zhu, Philip Siu, Yin Tan, Sarah Lai, Ivette Astudillo, Safa S. Ibrahim, Ming-Chin Yeh, Min Qi Wang. Promising effects of a culturally tailored multilevel pilot intervention to increase HPV vaccination uptake among Asian American female and male adolescents [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2018 Nov 2-5; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl):Abstract nr A029.

Individual vs. Group Delivery of Acupuncture Therapy for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Urban Primary Care\u2014a Randomized Trial

BackgroundAcupuncture has been shown to be effective for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal back, neck, and osteoarthritis pain. However, access to acupuncture treatment has been limited in medically underserved and low-income populations.ObjectiveAcupuncture therapy delivered in groups could reduce cost and expand access. We compared the effectiveness of group versus individual acupuncture for pain and function among ethnically diverse, low-income primary care patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.DesignThis was a randomized comparative effectiveness non-inferiority trial in 6 Bronx primary care community health centers. Participants with chronic (> 3 months) back, neck, or osteoarthritis pain were randomly assigned to individual or group acupuncture therapy for 12 weeks.ParticipantsSeven hundred seventy-nine participants were randomized. Mean age was 54.8 years. 35.3% of participants identified as black and 56.9% identified as Latino. Seventy-six percent were Medicaid insured, 60% reported poor/fair health, and 37% were unable to work due to disability.InterventionsParticipants received weekly acupuncture treatment in either group or individual setting for 12 weeks.Main MeasuresPrimary outcome was pain interference on the Brief Pain Inventory at 12 weeks; secondary outcomes were pain severity (BPI), physical and mental well-being (PROMIS-10), and opiate use. Outcome measures were collected at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks.Key Results37.5% of individual arm and 30.3% in group had > 30% improvement in pain interference (d = 7.2%, 95% CI − 0.6%, 15.1%). Non-inferiority of group acupuncture was not demonstrated for the primary outcome assuming a margin of 10%. In the responder analysis of physical well-being, 63.1% of individual participants and 59.5% of group had clinically important improvement at 12 weeks (d = 3.6%, 95% CI − 4.2%, 11.4%).ConclusionsBoth individual and group acupuncture therapy delivered in primary care settings reduced chronic pain and improved physical function at 12 weeks; non-inferiority of group was not shown.Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov # NCT02456727

Comprehensive geriatric assessment in a marginal community of Ecuador

Background: older adults suffer from diseases that can affect their functional, psychological and social parameters. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is used as an evaluation tool for these parameters through the use of validated, simple and easy-to-apply instruments. Objective: to report the health status of older adults who attend a primary care center in an urban-marginal area of Guayaquil (Ecuador) through CGA, as a first step in order to establish a coordinated care plan in the areas studied. Material and Methods: a cross-sectional assessment of 196 aged subjects with a median age of 70.9 years (83 % females) who attended a Primary Care Community Health Center in Guayaquil. Nutritional, social, demographic, functional, and cognitive variables were assessed. Results: participants had a mean age of 70.9 ± 7.1 years. Demographic variables: 73 % were Afro-Ecuadorian, 69 % had basic education, and 57 % performed no physical activity. Clinical assessment: 47.4 % presented with vision impairment, and 37.8 % with hearing problems; 52 % had nutritional risk and 6 % malnutrition. Social valuation: 13 % had severe social deterioration; 40 % had some cognitive impairment, and 8.2 % had depression; 46.9 % were functionally dependent, and 16.8 % had dynapenia. Conclusions: CGA allows to identify major health problems in this population, which is why it is considered a practical and easy tool to apply in primary care centers in marginal urban populations as a first step to improve health status for this older population, which in recent years is growing significantly in developing countries such as Ecuador.

Integration of Hepatitis C Treatment in a Primary care Federally Qualified Health Center; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2015-2017.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a pressing public health issue. Identification of long term infection in primary care settings and community health centers can facilitate patients’ access to appropriate care. Given the increase in HCV prevalence in the United States, improving the HCV care continuum and expanding medication access to disproportionately affected populations can help reduce disease burden, health care system costs, and transmission. Innovative treatment programs developed in the primary care setting are needed to deliver quality care to meet the demand of those engaging in treatment. This article describes an HCV treatment program developed within a primary care federally qualified health center (FQHC) using physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) to address the high number of HCV positive patients identified at the clinic. An interdisciplinary care team was established to optimize patient experience around HCV care and treatment, using on-site primary care behavioral health consultants, an HCV treatment coordinator, and a 340B contracted specialty pharmacy. From January 2015 to April 2017, the Public Health Management Corporation (PHMC) Care Clinic medical providers referred 189 patients for HCV treatment. Of those referred, 102 patients successfully obtained a sustained virologic response (SVR), representing a 53.7% success rate from referral to cure. This treatment program successfully integrated HCV treatment in a patient population heavily affected by substance use and mental illness. Support and adoption of similar programs in primary care community health centers testing for HCV can help meet the clinical/behavioral needs of these marginalized populations.

The Impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid Expansion on Visit Rates for Diabetes in Safety Net Health Centers.

To (1) compare clinic-level uninsured, Medicaid-insured, and privately insured visit rates within and between expansion and nonexpansion states before and after the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion among the 3 cohorts of patient populations; and (2) assess whether there was a change in clinic-level overall, primary care visits, preventive care visits, and diabetes screening rates in expansion versus nonexpansion states from pre-ACA to post-ACA Medicaid expansion. Electronic health record data on nonpregnant patients aged 19 to 64 years, with ≥1 ambulatory visit between 01/01/2012 and 12/31/2015 (n = 483,912 in expansion states; n = 388,466 in nonexpansion states) from 198 primary care community health centers were analyzed. Using a difference-in-difference methodology, we assessed changes in visit rates pre-ACA versus post-ACA among a cohort of patients with diabetes, prediabetes, and no diabetes. Rates of uninsured visits decreased for all cohorts in expansion and nonexpansion states. For all cohorts, Medicaid-insured visit rates increased significantly more in expansion compared with nonexpansion states, especially among prediabetic patients (+71%). In nonexpansion states, privately insured visit rates more than tripled for the prediabetes cohort and doubled for the diabetes and no diabetes cohorts. Rates for glycosylated hemoglobin screenings increased in all groups, with the largest changes among no diabetes (rate ratio, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.97-2.56) and prediabetes cohorts (rate ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.80-2.19) in expansion states. The ACA reduced uninsurance and increased access to preventive care for vulnerable patients, especially those with prediabetes. These findings are important to consider when making decisions regarding altering the ACA.

Medicaid coverage accuracy in electronic health records

Health insurance coverage facilitates access to preventive screenings and other essential health care services, and is linked to improved health outcomes; therefore, it is critical to understand how well coverage information is documented in the electronic health record (EHR) and which characteristics are associated with accurate documentation. Our objective was to evaluate the validity of EHR data for monitoring longitudinal Medicaid coverage and assess variation by patient demographics, visit types, and clinic characteristics. We conducted a retrospective, observational study comparing Medicaid status agreement between Oregon community health center EHR data linked at the patient-level to Medicaid enrollment data (gold standard). We included adult patients with a Medicaid identification number and ≥1 clinic visit between 1/1/2013–12/31/2014 [>1 million visits (n = 135,514 patients)]. We estimated statistical correspondence between EHR and Medicaid data at each visit (visit-level) and for different insurance cohorts over time (patient-level). Data were collected in 2016 and analyzed 2017–2018. We observed excellent agreement between EHR and Medicaid data for health insurance information: kappa (>0.80), sensitivity (>0.80), and specificity (>0.85). Several characteristics were associated with agreement; at the visit-level, agreement was lower for patients who preferred a non-English language and for visits missing income information. At the patient-level, agreement was lower for black patients and higher for older patients seen in primary care community health centers. Community health center EHR data are a valid source of Medicaid coverage information. Agreement varied with several characteristics, something researchers and clinic staff should consider when using health insurance information from EHR data.

Abstract B14: Promising effects of a culturally tailored pilot intervention to increase HPV vaccination uptake among female and male adolescents

Abstract Background: HPV vaccination is recommended for female and male adolescents in the U.S. to prevent HPV-related cancer, yet the uptake remains suboptimal nationwide. Asian American female adolescents have the lowest HPV vaccine rates. Successful HPV vaccine depends heavily on parents' attitudes, perceptions, and willingness to have their adolescents vaccinated. Objective: This study was designed to test the feasibility and outcomes of a provider-based culturally tailored intervention among Asian American parents and their eligible adolescents. Methods: Asian American parents (n=120) who had adolescent girls and boys aged 11 to 18 (n=170) were recruited from a primary-care community health center. The primary outcome was first and second shots of HPV vaccination uptake 6 months following the intervention. Secondary outcomes included third shot of HPV vaccine at 6 months after the intervention for adolescents over the age of 12, increase in knowledge and belief in HPV vaccine, and engagement of adolescents in decision-making at post intervention. Results: Among 170 adolescents, 68% of them received first and second shots of HPV vaccine (73% for girls vs 63% for boys). Among 81 adolescents over the age of 12, 63% of them received third shot (63% for girls vs 76% for boys). Parents' (n=120) knowledge and belief in HPV vaccine and engagement of adolescents in decision-making have significantly increased from baseline to post intervention (p<0.001). Conclusion: A culturally tailored pilot intervention in a clinical setting demonstrated promising effects, which can potentially yield significant increase in HPV vaccine uptake among Asian American and other underserved ethnic minority female and male adolescents to prevent cancer. Citation Format: Grace X. Ma, Yin Tan, Shumenghui Zhai, Philip Siu, Sarah Lai, Lin Zhu, Adeodat Ilboudo, Min Qi Wang. Promising effects of a culturally tailored pilot intervention to increase HPV vaccination uptake among female and male adolescents [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr B14.

Management of Back Pain-related Disorders in a Community With Limited Access to Health Care Services: A Description of Integration of Chiropractors as Service Providers

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate a chiropractic service for back pain patients integrated within a publicly funded, multidisciplinary, primary care community health center in Cambridge, Ontario, Canada. MethodsPatients consulting for back pain of any duration were referred by their medical doctor or nurse practitioner for chiropractic treatment at the community health center. Patients completed questionnaires at baseline and at discharge from the service. Data were collected prospectively on consecutive patients between January 2014 and January 2016. ResultsQuestionnaire data were obtained from 93 patients. The mean age of the sample was 49.0 ± 16.27 years, and 66% were unemployed. More than three-quarters (77%) had had their back pain for more than a month, and 68% described it as constant. According to the Bournemouth Questionnaire, Bothersomeness, and global improvement scales, a majority (63%, 74%, and 93%, respectively) reported improvement at discharge, and most (82%) reported a significant reduction in pain medication. More than three-quarters (77%) did not visit their primary care provider while under chiropractic care, and almost all (93%) were satisfied with the service. According to the EuroQol 5 Domain questionnaire, more than one-third of patients (39%) also reported improvement in their general health state at discharge. ConclusionImplementation of an integrated chiropractic service was associated with high levels of improvement and patient satisfaction in a sample of patients of low socioeconomic status with subacute and chronic back pain.

Influence of an Interdisciplinary Diabetes Specialist Team on Short-Term Outcomes of Diabetes at a Community Health Center

To assess the effect on short-term diabetes outcomes of intervention with an interdisciplinary diabetes specialist team at a primary-care community health center in East Harlem, New York City. An interdisciplinary diabetes specialist team, consisting of a diabetologist, a bicultural certified diabetes nurse-educator, and a nutritionist, attended weekly clinics at a primary-care community health center in East Harlem. Emphasis was placed on communicating in the patient's primary language and providing nutritional counseling, diabetes education, and diabetes management. After 1 year, a retrospective review of medical records for patients seen by the diabetes team was performed to assess the influence of this intervention on performance of home glucose monitoring (HGM), frequency of hypoglycemia, and changes in diabetes treatment regimens. Of 70 patients referred to the diabetes team by their primary-care providers, 50 underwent follow-up for at least 6 months and were included in the statistical analysis. Of the 50 study patients, 94% had type 2 diabetes, with a mean duration of 11.2 years. Eighty-two percent were Hispanic, and 18% were Afro-American. The mean age was 54.6 years. Microvascular complications were present in 44%, and macrovascular complications were present in 22%. HGM was done by 13 patients (26%) before and 33 patients (66%) after diabetes team intervention (P<0.001). Before intervention by the diabetes team, 14 patients (28%) were having episodes of unrecognized hypoglycemia. Unrecognized hypoglycemia resolved after intervention in all but two patients with type 1 diabetes (P<0.001). Before intervention, diabetes treatment was dietary in 6 patients, a sulfonylurea in 19, and insulin in 25; after intervention, 5 patients had dietary management of their diabetes, 14 were taking a sulfonylurea, and 31 were receiving insulin (P<0.05). Providing access to an interdisciplinary diabetes specialist team at the site of primary care had a beneficial effect on short-term diabetes outcomes in inner-city Hispanic and Afro-American patients with diabetes. Providing specialty care in the primary-care setting may be one model for improving the quality and long-term outcomes of diabetes care, particularly in high-risk populations.

Nurse-Managed Primary Care

A nurse-managed primary care community health center, Abbottsford Community Health Center (ACHC), provides highly accessible, quality, cost-effective care to the residents of the Abbottsford Community. Data revealed that, in comparison to the aggregate family practices in an HMO, ACHC has achieved better outcomes in areas such as emergency department visits, inpatient days and client care costs. The nurse manager's roles and responsibility are critical in achieving this success.

The Person with AIDS

This book serves as a resource for nurses providing care to persons with HIV/AIDS across the spectrum of HIV disease and across a variety of practice settings. The expert contributors provide up-to-date information on the HIV pandemic, including HIV/AIDS as a chronic condition internationally served most by primary care community health centers. The book introduces the nurse clinician to the complex concepts, unique issues, and current treatments central to caring for persons with HIV/AIDS from an international nursing perspective. Contributors offer recommendations for nursing assessment, intervention, and evaluation of HIV care in the context of advanced therapies that have prolonged the lives of persons with HIV/AIDS.