Primary Care Clinics Research Articles

Use of a Handheld Ultrasonographic Device to Identify Heart Failure and Pulmonary Disease in Rural Africa

Agreement in lung ultrasonography findings between clinicians using a handheld ultrasonographic device and expert sonographers using a high-end ultrasonographic machine has not been studied in sub-Saharan Africa. To determine the agreement in ultrasonographic findings and diagnoses between primary care clinicians trained in lung ultrasonography, board-certified expert sonographers, and senior physicians. This cross-sectional single-center study was conducted from February 1, 2022, to April 30, 2023 at a referral center in rural Tanzania. Individuals 5 years or older with respiratory symptoms and at least 2 distinct respiratory signs or symptoms were eligible. A total of 459 individuals were screened. Participants provided their medical history and underwent a clinical examination and lung ultrasonography performed by a clinician, followed by a lung ultrasonography performed by an expert sonographer, and finally chest radiography and a final evaluation performed by a senior physician. Other tests, such as echocardiography and Mycobacterium tuberculosis testing, were conducted on the decision of the physician. Clinicians received 2 hours of instruction and three 2-hour sessions of clinical training in the use of a handheld lung ultrasonographic device; expert sonographers were board-certified. Percentage agreement and Cohen κ coefficient for sonographic findings and diagnoses compared between clinicians and expert sonographers, and between clinicians and senior physicians. The median (IQR) age of 438 included participants was 54 (38-66) years, and 225 (51%) were male. The median (range) percentage agreement of ultrasonographic findings between clinicians and expert sonographers was 93% (71%-99%), with κ ranging from -0.003 to 0.83. Median (range) agreement of diagnoses between clinicians and expert sonographers was 90% (50%-99%), with κ ranging from -0.002 to 0.76. Between clinicians and senior physicians, median (range) agreement of diagnoses was 89% (55%-90%), with κ ranging from -0.008 to 0.76. Between clinicians and senior physicians, diagnosis agreements were 85% (κ, 0.69) for heart failure, 78% (κ, 0.57) for definite or probable tuberculosis, 50% (κ, 0.002) for viral pneumonia, and 56% (κ, 0.06) for bacterial pneumonia. In this cross-sectional study, the agreement of ultrasonographic findings between clinicians and sonographers was mostly substantial. Between clinicians and senior physicians, agreement was substantial in the diagnosis of heart failure, moderate in the diagnosis of tuberculosis, but slight in the diagnosis of pneumonia. These findings suggest that handheld ultrasonographic devices used in addition to clinical examination may support clinicians in diagnosing cardiac and pulmonary diseases in rural sub-Saharan Africa.

Construction of an instrument to enable the assessment of the risk of falls in older outpatients: A quantitative methodological study.

To develop an instrument to facilitate the risk assessment of falls in older outpatients. A quantitative methodological study using the cross-sectional data. This study enrolled 1988 older participants who underwent comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in an outpatient clinic from May 2020 to November 2022. The history of any falls (≥1 falls in a year) and recurrent falls (≥2 falls in a year) were investigated. Potential risk factors of falls were selected by stepwise logistic regression, and a screening tool was constructed based on nomogram. The tool performance was compared with two reference tools (Fried Frailty Phenotype; CGA with 10 items, CGA-10) by using receiver operating curves, sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), and area under the curve (AUC). Age, unintentional weight loss, depression measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2, muscle strength measured by the five times sit-to-stand test, and stand balance measured by semi- and full-tandem standing were the most important risk factors for falls. A fall risk screening tool was constructed with the six measurements (FRST-6). FRST-6 showed the best AUC (Sen, Spe) of 0.75 (Sen = 0.72, Spe = 0.69) for recurrent falls and 0.65 (Sen = 0.74, Spe = 0.48) for any falls. FRST-6 was comparable to CGA-10 and outperformed FFP in performance. Age, depression, weight loss, gait, and balance were important risk factors of falls. The FRST-6 tool based on these factors showed acceptable performance in risk stratification. Performing a multifactorial assessment in primary care clinics is urgent for falls prevention. The FRST-6 provides a simple and practical way for falls risk screening. With this tool, healthcare professionals can efficiently identify patients at risk of falling and make appropriate recommendations in resource-limited settings. No patient or public contribution was received, due to our study design.

Protocol for the ONLOOP trial: pragmatic randomized trial evaluating a province-wide system of personalized reminders for evidence-based surveillance tests in adult survivors of childhood cancer in Ontario

BackgroundChildhood cancer treatment while often curative, leads to elevated risks of morbidity and mortality. Survivors require lifelong periodic surveillance for late effects of treatment, yet adherence to guideline-recommended tests is suboptimal. We created ONLOOP to provide adult survivors of childhood cancer with detailed health information, including summaries of their childhood cancer treatment and recommended surveillance tests for early detection of cardiomyopathy, breast cancer, and/or colorectal cancer, with personalized reminders over time.MethodsThis is an individually randomized, registry-based pragmatic trial with an embedded process and economic evaluation to understand ONLOOP’s impact and whether it can be readily implemented at scale. All adult survivors of childhood cancer in Ontario overdue for guideline-recommended tests will be randomly assigned to one of two arms: (1) intervention or (2) delayed intervention. A letter of information and invitation will detail the ONLOOP program. Those who sign up will receive a personalized toolkit and a screening reminder 6 months later. With the participants’ consent, ONLOOP will also send their primary care clinician a letter detailing the recommended tests and a reminder 6 months later.The primary outcome will be the proportion of survivors who complete one or more of the guideline-recommended cardiac, breast, or colon surveillance tests during the 12 months after randomization. Data will be obtained from administrative databases. The intent-to-treat principle will be followed. Based on our analyses of administrative data, we anticipate allocating at least 862 individuals to each trial arm, providing 90% power to detect an absolute increase of 6% in targeted surveillance tests completed. We will interview childhood cancer survivors and family physicians in an embedded process evaluation to examine why and how ONLOOP achieved success or failed. A cost-effectiveness evaluation will be performed.DiscussionThe results of this study will determine if ONLOOP is effective at helping adult survivors of childhood cancer complete their recommended surveillance tests. This study will also inform ongoing provincial programs for this high-risk population.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05832138.

Caregiver Preferences for Primary Care Clinic-Based Food Assistance: A Discrete Choice Experiment

ObjectiveThe American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that pediatric providers screen families for food insecurity and connect them to appropriate resources. However, it is unclear how clinics can best provide families with resources consistent with their needs and preferences. In this study, we elicited caregiver preferences for clinic-based food assistance. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional discrete choice experiment in which caregivers at 2 pediatric primary care clinics were asked to choose between hypothetical food programs. Programs varied across 4 categories: 1) resources provided (eg, food delivery, food in clinic, assistance enrolling in benefits); 2) support staff providing resources (eg, social worker, community health worker, physician, or nurse); 3) outreach modality (eg, phone, email, text); and 4) outreach frequency. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess caregiver preferences within each category and the relative importance of each category to caregiver decisions. ResultsWe surveyed 142 caregivers who were predominantly Black (87%) and Medicaid-insured (90%). Caregiver preferences for food programs were most strongly influenced by the food resources provided. Caregivers preferred food delivery over other forms of food supports, such as food provided in clinic. They preferred assistance from a benefits enrollment specialist, community health worker, or social worker to assistance from a physician or nurse. ConclusionsPediatric clinics serving families at risk of food insecurity should use caregiver preferences to inform the design of family-centered interventions. Clinics should consider connecting caregivers with food delivery programs, and pediatric payors should adopt reimbursement models that support multidisciplinary team-based care to address food insecurity.

COVID-19 VACCINE UPTAKE AMONG OPULENT VS SLUMS OF URBAN SETTING IN KARACHI, PAKISTAN

Background: COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and acceptability are critical for a number of important outcomes, including symptomatic COVID-19, severe illnesses, and COVID-19-related mortality. Aim: To assess the immunization status regarding age, gender, and living standards and the reason for non-compliance to the Covid-19 vaccine among people of urban opulent and slums areas of a single city, i.e., Karachi, Pakistan. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2022 to January 2023 in Karachi, Pakistan. Data were collected through social media websites, including WhatsApp and Facebook, telephonic interviews from opulent urban areas, and direct contact during the visit to primary health care clinics in urban slum areas. STATA software was used for data analysis. Result: Of 1265 respondents from slums and opulent areas, 15.8% were non-vaccinated slums, whereas 14.16% belonged to opulent areas needing vaccination with adjusted OR 95% is 0.74(0.41-0.95). Of 1265 respondents, 825(65%) were females, and 440 (34.7%) were male. The vaccine compliance among females was 49%, and 32% among male respondents with adjusted OR 95% 1.84(1.12-3.03). Only 6% of the slums area were vaccinated with the required shots of vaccine (2 doses and one booster) compared to opulent areas, i.e., 20%. Conclusion: Our research at the population level adds to the knowledge we now have from patient data and demonstrates how aggregated data from fully functioning epidemic surveillance and monitoring may provide information about the possible effects of extended COVID on national and international public health.

Comparison of Clinical Decision Support Tools to Improve Pediatric Lipid Screening

ObjectiveTo test whether different clinical decision support tools increase clinician orders and patient completions relative to standard practice and each other. Study designA pragmatic, patient-randomized clinical trial in the electronic health record was conducted between October 2019 and April 2020 at Geisinger Health System in Pennsylvania, with four arms: care gap—a passive listing recommending screening; alert—a panel promoting and enabling lipid screen orders; both; and a standard practice—no guideline-based notification—control arm. Data were analyzed for 13,346 9 to 11 year-old patients seen within Geisinger primary care, cardiology, urgent care, or nutrition clinics, or who had an endocrinology visit. Principal outcomes were lipid screening orders by clinicians and completions by patients within one week of orders. ResultsActive (care gap and/or alert) versus control arm patients were significantly more likely (p<.05) to have lipid screening tests ordered and completed, with odds ratios ranging from 1.67 (95% CI: 1.28–2.19) to 5.73 (4.46–7.36) for orders and 1.54 (1.04–2.27) to 2.90 (95% CI: 2.02–4.15) for completions. Alerts, with or without care gaps listed, outperformed care gaps alone on orders, with odds ratios ranging from 2.92 (95% CI: 2.32–3.66) to 3.43 (2.73–4.29). ConclusionsElectronic alerts can increase lipid screening orders and completions, suggesting clinical decision support can improve guideline-concordant screening. The study also highlights electronic record-based patient randomization as a way to determine relative effectiveness of support tools.

Barriers and Facilitators to High Emergency Department Use Among Patients with Mental Disorders: A Qualitative Investigation.

This qualitative study explored reasons for high emergency department (ED) use (3 + visits/year) among 299 patients with mental disorders (MD) recruited in four ED in Quebec, Canada. A conceptual framework including healthcare system and ED organizational features, patient profiles, and professional practice guided the content analysis. Results highlighted insufficient access to and inadequacy of outpatient care. While some patients were quite satisfied with ED care, most criticized the lack of referrals or follow-up care. Patient profiles justifying high ED use were strongly associated with health and social issues perceived as needing immediate care. The main barriers in professional practice involved lack of MD expertise among primary care clinicians, and insufficient follow-up by psychiatrists in response to patient needs. Collaboration with outpatient care may be prioritized to reduce high ED use and improve ED interventions by strengthening the discharge process, and increasing access to outpatient care.

The effectiveness of a suicide prevention program in primary care clinics supported by community public health resources: A difference-in-differences analysis

The importance of appropriate and intensive follow-up management for individuals identified with suicide risk through screening is highlighted. The Link between Primary Care Clinic and Public Health Resources Intervention(LinkPC-PH), a suicide prevention program in primary care clinics supported by community public health resources, was implemented at the district level in 2017. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the LinkPC-PH intervention by comparing suicide rates before(2014-2016) and after(2017-2019) implementation of the intervention using a difference-in-differences design. The LinkPC-PH comprises several dimensions of intervention including screening, risk assessment of suicidality, and referral in primary care clinics and crisis contact within 24 hours, case management, and safety planning led by public health professionals. After adjustment for district-level confounders, an intervention-implemented district had 2.87 fewer suicide deaths per 100,000 people in a population sample at post-intervention than would have been expected from the same trend in suicide rates as non-implemented intervention districts. In other words, the suicide rate in the intervention area decreased by 25% following the intervention. These results empirically substantiate suicide prevention programs in primary care clinics by community public health resources for reduced suicide rates to support effective community-based suicide prevention interventions.

Relationship between facility number of clinicians and prescribing intensity of psychotropic medications, opioids, and antibiotics in ambulatory practice

BackgroundPromoting appropriate pharmacotherapy requires understanding the factors that influence how clinicians prescribe medications. While prior work has focused on patient and clinician factors, features of the organizational setting have received less attention, though identifying sources of variation in prescribing may help identify opportunities to improve patient safety and outcomes.ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between the number of clinicians who prescribe medications in a facility and facility prescribing intensity of six individual medication classes by clinician specialty: benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, antiepileptics, and antidepressants by psychiatrists and antibiotics, opioids, antiepileptics, and antidepressants by primary care clinicians (PCPs).DesignWe used 2017 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) administrative data.SubjectsWe included patient-clinician dyads of older patients (> 55 years) with an outpatient encounter with a clinician in 2017. Patient-clinician data from 140 VHA facilities were included (n = 13,347,658). Analysis was repeated for years 2014 to 2016.Main measuresFor each medication, facility prescribing intensity measures were calculated as clinician prescribing intensity averaged over all clinicians at each facility. Clinician prescribing intensity measures included percentage of each clinician’s patients prescribed the medication and mean number of days supply per patient among all patients of each clinician.Key resultsAs the number of prescribing clinicians in a facility increased, the intensity of prescribing decreased. Every increase of 10 facility clinicians was associated with a significant decline in prescribing intensity for both specialties for different medication classes: for psychiatrists, declines ranged from 6 to 11%, and for PCPs, from 2 to 3%. The pattern of more clinicians less prescribing was significant across all years.ConclusionFuture work should explore the mechanisms that link the number of facility clinicians with prescribing intensity for benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, antiepileptics, antidepressants, antibiotics, and opioids. Facilities with fewer clinicians may need additional resources to avoid unwanted prescribing of potentially harmful or unnecessary medications.

Multilevel approaches to address disparities in lung cancer screening: a study protocol

BackgroundLow-dose computed tomography (lung cancer screening) can reduce lung cancer-specific mortality by 20–24%. Based on this evidence, the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends annual lung cancer screening for asymptomatic high-risk individuals. Despite this recommendation, utilization is low (3–20%). Lung cancer screening may be particularly beneficial for African American patients because they are more likely to have advanced disease, lower survival, and lower screening rates compared to White individuals. Evidence points to multilevel approaches that simultaneously address multiple determinants to increase screening rates and decrease lung cancer burden in minoritized populations. This study will test the effects of provider- and patient-level strategies for promoting equitable lung cancer screening utilization.MethodsGuided by the Health Disparities Research Framework and the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model, we will conduct a quasi-experimental study with four primary care clinics within a large health system (MedStar Health). Individuals eligible for lung cancer screening, defined as 50–80 years old, ≥ 20 pack-years, currently smoking, or quit < 15 years, no history of lung cancer, who have an appointment scheduled with their provider, and who are non-adherent to screening will be identified via the EHR, contacted, and enrolled (N = 184 for implementation clinics, N = 184 for comparison clinics; total N = 368). Provider participants will include those practicing at the partner clinics (N = 26). To increase provider-prompted discussions about lung screening, an electronic health record (EHR) clinician reminder will be sent to providers prior to scheduled visits with the screening-eligible participants. To increase patient-level knowledge and patient activation about screening, an inreach specialist will conduct a pre-visit phone-based educational session with participants. Patient participants will be assessed at baseline and 1-week post-visit to measure provider-patient discussion, screening intentions, and knowledge. Screening referrals and screening completion rates will be assessed via the EHR at 6 months. We will use mixed methods and multilevel assessments of patients and providers to evaluate the implementation outcomes (adoption, feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity).DiscussionThe study will inform future work designed to measure the independent and overlapping contributions of the multilevel implementation strategies to advance equity in lung screening rates.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04675476. Registered December 19, 2020.

Scaling care coordination through digital engagement: stepped-wedge trial assessing readmissions.

Transitions of care are pivotal, vulnerable times as patients are discharged from the hospital. Telephonic care coordination is standard care, but labor intensive. We implemented a patient postdischarge digital engagement (PDDE) program to scale coordination. We hypothesized that PDDE could reduce readmissions for low-risk patients and supplement care coordination for medium- and high-risk patients. Pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomization trial with 5 implementation waves based upon primary care clinic region. All inpatient hospital discharges between March 2020 and November 2020 were stratified by readmission risk. Low-risk patients were offered access to PDDE, and moderate-risk and high-risk patients were offered access to PDDE and care coordination. Readmission was defined as an unplanned inpatient admission within 30 days from discharge. An intention-to-treat primary analysis was conducted using mixed-effects logistic regression clustering for wave; a treatment-on-the-treated analysis was also conducted to assess the impact among program users. A total of 5490 patient discharges were examined (2735 control; 2755 intervention); 1949 patients were high risk, 2032 were medium risk, and 1509 were low risk. PDDE intervention did not significantly affect readmission among low-risk (95% CI, -0.23 to 0.90; P = .23), medium-risk (95%CI, -0.14 to 0.60; P = .21), and high-risk (95% CI, -0.32 to 0.64; P = .48) groups after adjustment for time and patient factors. In a treatment-on-the-treated analysis, among patients who activated the PDDE program, readmission was also similar among the low-, medium-, and high-risk cohorts. Our study expanded resource-limited care coordination by offering low-risk patients a service they were unable to receive previously while having no impact on readmission. PDDE efficiently provided additional touch points between patients and providers.

The salience of structural barriers and behavioral health problems to ART adherence in people receiving HIV primary care in South Africa

ABSTRACT Multilevel factors (individual and structural) influence adherence to antiretroviral therapy, particularly in high HIV prevalence areas such as South Africa. The present study examined the relative importance of structural barriers to HIV care and behavioral health factors, depression and alcohol use, in Khayelitsha, Cape Town, South Africa. People receiving HIV care in six primary care clinics in Khayelitsha (N = 194) completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, the Structural Barriers to Medication Taking questionnaire, and a qualitative rating of past-two-week adherence. Correlations were employed to examine associations among these variables, and hierarchical regression analysis was used to examine the unique effects of structural barriers over and above depression and alcohol use as predictors of adherence. Participants were primarily Black South African (99%) women (83%), and 41 years old on average. All four variables were significantly correlated. The hierarchical regression analysis showed that among behavioral health predictors, alcohol use alone significantly predicted ART adherence (b = -.032, p = .002). When structural barriers was added to the model, it was the only significant unique predictor of ART adherence (b = −1.58, p < .001). Findings highlight the need to consider structural vulnerabilities in HIV care in South Africa when developing behavioral health interventions.

Exploring Patients' and Chaplains' Perspectives About a Spiritual Care Program in the Primary Care Setting.

Spirituality is an important component of social and cultural identity that influences health-related beliefs, decision-making, and coping behaviors. Despite the importance of addressing spirituality in healthcare, research about its impact is limited, especially in the primary care setting. This study aimed to explore patients' and chaplains' experiences of receiving or providing spiritual care in the primary care setting. We conducted an in-depth interview qualitative research study. Participants included patient informants, a chaplain, and chaplains-in-training who participated in a spiritual care program at a primary care clinic. Interviews were transcribed and coded. Conventional qualitative research content analysis was performed. Eleven interviews were conducted - 7 with patient informants, 1 with a chaplain, and 3 with chaplains-in-training. Informants reported that in their experience spiritual care increased trust in their provider, made them feel safe to ask or share anything, improved their satisfaction with care, helped sustain healthy behavior change, and improved coping with chronic illness. Participants specifically attributed these positive experiences to chaplains' ability to respect and attend to patients' spirituality, create a safe space, help patients see the connection between their spirituality and health, and help patients tap into their own spirituality as a healthy means of coping. Spiritual care, when integrated into the primary care setting, has the potential, according to the report of our informants, to help achieve important health-related objectives, such as increased trust in their providers, sustained healthy behavior change, and happiness in spite of chronic illness. Now, more than ever, when our society is hurting from mistrust of our profession secondary to disinformation and discrimination, spiritual care has an important role to play in our efforts to gain our patients' trust so that we can support their healing.

The Characteristics of Epitaxis Patients at Sumedang Regional Public Hospital Emergency Departement in 2021-2022

Epitaxis is a term from Greek, epistaizein, which means bleeding from the nose. Epitaxis is common problem ranging from minor traces of blood or clot to isolated massive bleeds that may be life-threatening and one of the common ear, nose, throat emergencies that present to emergency department or the primary care clinic . From an epidemiological of view, the lifetime incidence of epitaxis has been reported to be as high as 60% people worldwide during their lifetime. However, a real number is difficult to be estimated as only a very small proportion requires specialist management and therefore many cases escape to evaluation. Only 10% of patients with epitaxis will present to a physician. This study aims the characteristics of epitaxis patients in Emergency Departement of Sumedang Regional Public Hospital from January 2021 to December 2022. This study was designed as a retrospective descriptive study. Research used medical records on patients diagnosed with epitaxis. The research's results showed that there are 74 patients in that period with 7 patients experiencing recurrent epitaxis, 2 patients with hypotension and 27 patients with anemia. The incidence in male is higher than female. Patients with epitaxis more common in the age group &gt;45 years. The most common cause of epitaxis is by systemic cause.

Duplex Vertical-Flow Rapid Tests for Point-of-Care Detection of Anti-dsDNA and Anti-Nuclear Autoantibodies.

The goal of this study is to develop a rapid diagnostic test for rheumatic disease and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) screening. A novel rapid vertical flow assay (VFA) was engineered and used to assay anti-nuclear (ANA) and anti-dsDNA (αDNA) autoantibodies from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and healthy controls (HCs). Observer scores and absolute signal intensities from the VFA were validated via ELISA. The rapid point-of-care VFA test that was engineered demonstrated a limit of detection of 0.5 IU/mL for ANA and αDNA autoantibodies in human plasma with an inter-operator CV of 19% for ANA and 12% for αDNA. Storage stability was verified over a three-month period. When testing anti-dsDNA and ANA levels in SLE and HC serum samples, the duplex VFA revealed 95% sensitivity, 72% specificity and an 84% ROC AUC value in discriminating disease groups, comparable to the gold standard, ELISA. The rapid αDNA/ANA duplex VFA can potentially be used in primary care clinics for evaluating patients or at-risk subjects for rheumatic diseases and for planning follow-up testing. Given its low cost, ease, and rapid turnaround, it can also be used to assess SLE prevalence estimates.

How low can you go? Titrating the lowest effective dose of cyproterone acetate for transgender and gender diverse people who request feminizing hormones

Background: Administration of cyproterone acetate (CPA), to reduce the production and effects of testosterone, is often part of clinical regimens for trans individuals seeking feminization. Due to the potency of CPA, there are dose-related side effects and over-suppression of testosterone that can occur. Aim: This study aimed to determine the lowest possible dosing of CPA to reduce dose-related side effects while still achieving patient goals. Methods: This uncontrolled intervention study recruited participants seeking full-dose feminizing hormone treatment from across six study sites in Australia (primary care and sexual health clinics). Administration of CPA was defined using a titration protocol to achieve the target testosterone range (0.5–1.5 nmol/L). Descriptive analysis was conducted to investigate various factors of interest that pertained to the aims of the study. Results: A total of 74 participants commenced the study. There was a high rate of loss to follow-up with 62.2% (46/74) completing the protocol endpoint. Of participants who completed the protocol, 74.0% (34/46) were able to achieve the target T-range (0.5–1.5 nmol/L) and 41.3% (19/46) were titrated to the lowest CPA level (12.5 mg cyproterone twice weekly). Discussion: This study provided clinical evidence that lower and alternate-day dosing CPA can achieve adequate testosterone suppression in individuals undergoing feminizing gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT). This provides promising evidence of the acceptability of lowering CPA dosing to reduce the impacts of CPA-related side effects and improve the outcomes and experiences of individuals undergoing GAHT.

Association of Neighborhood Opportunity with Infant Brain Activity and Cognitive Development.

Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with lower neurocognitive scores and differences in brain structure among school-age children. Associations between positive neighborhood characteristics, infant brain activity, and cognitive development are underexplored. We examined direct and indirect associations between neighborhood opportunity, brain activity, and cognitive development. This longitudinal cohort study included infants from 2 primary care clinics in Boston and Los Angeles. Using a sample of 65 infants, we estimated path models to examine associations between neighborhood opportunity (measured by the Child Opportunity Index), infant electroencephalography (EEG) at 6 months, and infant cognitive development (measured using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning) at 12 months. A mediation model tested whether EEG power explained associations between neighborhood opportunity and infant cognition. Neighborhood opportunity positively predicted infant absolute EEG power across multiple frequency bands: low (b = 0.12, 95% CI 0.01-0.24, p = 0.04, = 0.21); high (b = 0.11, 95% CI 0.01-0.21, p = 0.03, = 0.23); (b = 0.10, 95% CI 0.00-0.19, p = 0.04, = 0.20); and (b = 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.22, p = 0.02, = 0.24). The results remained statistically significant after applying a Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate of 0.10 to adjust for multiple comparisons. No significant associations emerged between neighborhood opportunity, relative EEG power, and infant cognition. Mediation was not significant. Neighborhood opportunity is positively associated with some forms of infant brain activity, suggesting that positive neighborhood characteristics may play a salient role in early development.

Temporal Trends in Practice Patterns After Introduction of Pediatric Hypertension Guidelines in Canada

In 2016 and 2017, respectively, new Canadian and US guidelines for diagnosis and management of pediatric hypertension (HTN) were published. Six years after their publication, it is unknown whether the recommendations have led to changes in primary care practice patterns. To determine whether HTN guidelines are associated with changes in practice patterns among primary care clinicians. This retrospective, multicenter, population-based cohort study was conducted across 3 phases: January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2015 (era 1), January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017 (washout period), and January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019 (era 2). Data were collected from 7 Canadian provinces using the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network Electronic Medical Record database. Eligible participants included children and adolescents (aged ≥3 to <18 years) with 1 or more encounters in the database. Data analysis was conducted from February 2022 to February 2023. Implementation of the 2016 Hypertension Canada and 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines. The primary outcomes were annual BP screening documentation, high BP follow-up documentation at 6 months and 1-year, HTN prevalence, laboratory testing rates, and medication prescription rates. Interrupted time series analysis was used to assess the association of the introduction of the Canadian and US guidelines with outcomes. The study included 343 191 children and adolescents (mean [SD] age at first encounter, 6.7 (4.6) years; 173 290 female [50.5%]; 169 901 male [49.5%]), including 235 094 patients in era 1 and 193 473 patients in era 2. In era 1, 55 550 patients (23.6%) had at least 1 BP measurement, and in era 2, 45 006 patients (23.3%) had at least 1 BP measurement. There was a significant increase in BP screening in era 2 from 26 876 of 148 554 screenings (18.1%) to 28 556 of 141 192 screenings (20.2%; β = 0.202; 95% CI, 0.009 to 0.390; P = .04), and the increasing trend was sustained. There was a significant decrease in the trend of follow-up of high BP measurement at 6 months (1265 of 4941 patients with BP measurements [25.6%] to 1718 of 7321 patients with BP measurements [23.5%]; β = -0.490; 95% CI, -0.758 to -0.223; P = .001) and 1 year (1974 of 4941 measurements [40.0%] to 2314 of 7321 measurements [31.6%]; β = -1.392; 95% CI, -1.573 to -1.212; P < .001) in era 2. The proportion of patients meeting HTN criteria significantly increased from 2540 of 55 550 patients (4.6%) in era 1 to 5690 of 45 006 patients (12.6%) in era 2 (β = 0.0210; 95% CI, 0.0021 to 0.0410; P = .03). There was no significant change in the trend of laboratory testing rates in era 2 (949 of 4941 patients tested [19.2%] to 1149 of 7321 patients tested [15.7%]; β = -0.159; 95% CI, -0.364 to 0.046; P = .12). The trend in prescribing of medications to patients with HTN also decreased in era 2 (1305 of 4941 patients prescribed medication [26.4%] to 1415 of 7321 patients prescribed medication [19.3%]; β = -0.605; 95% CI, -0.830 to -0.358; P < .001). The findings of this cohort study within the Canadian primary care setting suggest that there was a significant increase in BP screening and HTN prevalence after the publication of national and international HTN guidelines; however, the follow-up of high BP was still suboptimal. Increasing rates of pediatric HTN emphasize the need for better adherence to pediatric HTN guidelines to improve care and outcomes.

Buprenorphine Receipt and Retention for Opioid Use Disorder following an Initiative to Increase Access in Primary Care

Objectives Buprenorphine, a medication for opioid use disorder (OUD), is underutilized in general medical settings. Further, it is inequitably received by racialized groups and persons with comorbidities. The Veterans Health Administration launched an initiative to increase buprenorphine receipt in primary care. The project's objective was to identify patient-related factors associated with buprenorphine receipt and retention in primary care clinics (n = 18) participating in the initiative. Methods Retrospective cohort quality improvement evaluation of patients 18 years or older with 2 or more primary care visits in a 1-year period and an OUD diagnosis in the year before the first primary care visit (index date). Buprenorphine receipt was the proportion of patients with OUD who received 1 or more buprenorphine prescriptions from primary care providers during the post–index year and retention the proportion who received buprenorphine for 180 days or longer. Results Of 2880 patients with OUD seen in primary care, 11.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6%–12.9%) received buprenorphine in primary care, 58.2% (95% CI, 52.8%–63.3%) of whom were retained on buprenorphine for 180 days or longer. Patients with alcohol use disorder (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.39; 95% CI, 0.27–0.57), nonopioid drug use disorder (AOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45–0.93), and serious mental illness (AOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37–0.97) had lower buprenorphine receipt. Those with an anxiety disorder had higher buprenorphine receipt (AOR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.04–1.95). Buprenorphine receipt (AOR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35–0.87) and 180-day retention (AOR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19–0.84) were less likely among non-Hispanic Black patients. Conclusions Further integration of addiction services in primary care may be needed to enhance buprenorphine receipt for patients with comorbid substance use disorders, and interventions are needed to address disparities in receipt and retention among non-Hispanic Black patients.

Pediatric Tuberculosis Infection Care Facilitators and Barriers: A Qualitative Study.

A total of 700 000 US children and adolescents are estimated to have latent tuberculosis (TB) infection. Identifying facilitators and barriers to engaging in TB infection care is critical to preventing pediatric TB disease. We explored families' and clinicians' perspectives on pediatric TB infection diagnosis and care. We conducted individual interviews and small group discussions with primary care and subspecialty clinicians, and individual interviews with caregivers of children diagnosed with TB infection. We sought to elicit facilitators and barriers to TB infection care engagement. We used applied thematic analysis to elucidate themes relating to care engagement, and organized themes using a cascade-grounded pediatric TB infection care engagement framework. We enrolled 19 caregivers and 24 clinicians. Key themes pertaining to facilitators and barriers to care emerged that variably affected engagement at different steps of care. Clinic and health system themes included the application of risk identification strategies and communication of risk; care ecosystem accessibility; programs to reduce cost-related barriers; and medication adherence support. Patient- and family-level themes included TB knowledge and beliefs; trust in clinicians, tests, and medical institutions; behavioral skills; child development and parenting; and family resources. Risk identification, education techniques, trust, family resources, TB stigma, and care ecosystem accessibility enabled or impeded care cascade engagement. Our results delineate an integrated pediatric TB infection care engagement framework that can inform multilevel interventions to improve retention in the pediatric TB infection care cascade.