Previous Stent Research Articles

Tracheal Resection after Previous Treatment Provides Comparable Outcome to Primary Surgery.

Tracheal and laryngotracheal surgery provides both excellent functional results and long-term outcomes in the treatment of tracheal stenosis. Consequently, challenging re-resections are rarely necessary. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of (laryngo-)tracheal re-resection and surgery after bronchoscopic interventions with that of primary surgery. Patients undergoing resection for benign tracheal stenosis at our center between 1/2016 and 4/2020 were included. Perioperative characteristics and functional outcomes of patients were used for statistical analysis. Sixty-six patients who underwent (laryngo-)tracheal resection were included (previous resection [A = 6], previous stent [B = 6], previous bronchoscopic intervention w/o stenting [C = 19], untreated [D = 35]). Baseline parameters were largely comparable between groups with exception from group B that had significantly worse lung function. Group A necessitated more complex reconstructions (end-to-end: n = 1: 17%| cricotracheal n = 2: 33%| cricotracheal with mucosectomy n = 2: 33%| laryngoplasty: n = 1: 17%) than patients in group D (end-to-end n = 21: 60%| cricotracheal n = 14: 40%). Postoperative outcomes were comparable throughout groups (intensive care unit: 1[1-18] days; hospital stay: 8[5-71] days). Anastomotic complications were higher after previous stenting (A: 0%; B: 33.3%; C: 10.5%; D: 2.9%; B/D p = 0.008| surgical revisions: A: 16.7%; B: 33.3%; C: 0%; D: 5.7%; B/D, p = 0.035). Overall, postoperative lung function was significantly better (forced expiratory volume in 1 second: 63% ± 24 vs. 75% ± 20; p = 0.001 | PeakEF 3.3 ± 1.9 vs. 5.0 ± 2.2L; p = 0.001). No 90-day mortality was observed in any group. Median follow-up was 12(1-47) months. In carefully selected patients treated in a specialized center, tracheal or laryngotracheal resection after previous tracheal interventions provides comparable outcome to primary surgery.

Initial Results of Antegrade Laser Fenestrations Using Image Fusion Guidance and Company Manufactured Stent Grafts in Complex Aortic Aneurysm Repair

The aim was to describe initial outcomes of physician modified stent grafts using antegrade laser fenestrations and image fusion guidance (LEVAR) and company manufactured custom made (CM) stent grafts for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAAs), thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) and type I endoleaks (T1ELs). This was a retrospective single centre study. All LEVAR and Zenith (Cook) CM stent graft procedures between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2018 were reviewed. Endpoints included intra-operative adverse events (IOAEs), in hospital mortality, re-interventions, target vessel patency, and 12 month outcomes (overall survival, freedom from re-intervention, target vessel patency). Outcomes at 12 months were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A hundred patients were identified and included in the study. All patients were deemed unfit for open repair. The cohort included 22 LEVAR and 78 CM stent grafts. LEVAR cases included painful aneurysms (n= 5), > 65 mm aneurysms (n= 10), anatomical constrains and/or presence of previous renal stents (n= 7) or cases declined by the manufacturer planning centre (n= 2). IOAEs were recorded in 41% of cases (n= 9) in the LEVAR group vs. 10% (n= 8, p= .002) in the CM group. The in hospital mortality rate in the LEVAR group was 9% (n= 2) vs. 4% (n= 3, p= .30) in the CM group. The median follow up duration was 22 months (7 - 38) in the LEVAR group and 28 months (11 - 78) in the CM group. The estimate of overall survival at one year was 91% in both groups. The freedom from re-intervention rate at one year was 58% in the LEVAR group vs. 87% in the CM group. The target vessel patency rates at one year were 95% in both groups. In high risk patients deemed unfit for open repair, LEVAR may provide satisfactory 12 month overall survival and target vessel patency rates, though reported IOAE, mortality, and re-interventions rates were high thus requiring close and extensive follow up.

Effect of ischemia–reperfusion on outcomes after open mesenteric bypass for chronic mesenteric ischemia

ObjectiveSignificant physiologic perturbations can occur in patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) undergoing open mesenteric bypass (OMB). These events have frequently been attributed to ischemia–reperfusion events and have been directly implicated in the occurrence of multiple organ dysfunction (MOD). Scoring systems (MOD score [MODS] and sequential organ failure assessment [SOFA]) have been derived within the critical care field to provide a composite metric for these pathophysiologic changes. The purpose of the present study was to describe the early pathophysiologic changes that occur after OMB for CMI and determine whether these are predictive of the outcomes. MethodsPatients with CMI who had undergone elective OMB from 2002 to 2018 at a single institution were reviewed. Changes in the hemodynamic, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, and hematologic parameters in the first 96 hours postoperatively were analyzed. The MODSs and SOFA scores were calculated. Cox regression was used to determine the association of the MODSs and SOFA scores with the outcomes. ResultsThe use of OMB was analyzed for 72 patients (age, 66 ± 11 years; 68% women; body mass index, 23.8 ± 6 kg/m2; 48 ± 34-lb weight loss in 59%). Previous mesenteric stent placement or bypass had been performed in 39% [stenting in 21; bypass in 8; (one patient had both)]. An antegrade configuration (93%) was most common (retrograde configuration, 7%), with revascularization of the superior mesenteric artery/celiac vessels in 85% (superior mesenteric artery only in 15%). Postoperative pathophysiologic and metabolic changes were common, and the mean MODSs and SOFA scores were 3.6 ± 2.4 (range, 1-10) and 4.0 ± 2.7 (range, 1-13), respectively. The median length of stay was 14 days (interquartile range, 9-21). The 30-day mortality was 4% (n = 3) and in-hospital morbidity was 53% (n = 38; gastrointestinal, 25%; infectious, 22%; cardiac, 18%; pulmonary, 18%; renal, 11%). The clinical follow-up period was 16 ± 20 months. The MODSs and SOFA scores correlated linearly with overall mortality (MODS: odds ratio [OR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-1.7; P < .01; SOFA score: OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.7; P < .01 per unit), with a score of ≥5 the inflection point most predictive of mortality (MODS: OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.6-9.9; P ≤ .01; SOFA score: OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.6; P = .02). The 1- and 3-year primary bypass patency and freedom from reintervention was 91% ± 5% and 83% ± 7%, respectively, with no association with the MODSs or SOFA scores. The 1- and 3-year survival was 86% ± 4% and 71% ± 6% with significantly worse outcomes for patients with higher MODSs and/or SOFA scores. ConclusionsMost CMI patients undergoing OMB will experience significant metabolic derangements resulting from sequelae of the ischemia–reperfusion phenomenon postoperatively. These can be objectively assessed in the early postoperative period using simply applied scoring systems to reliably predict the early and long-term outcomes. A derivation of the MODS and/or SOFA score after OMB for CMI can identify the most vulnerable patients at the greatest risk of mortality.

Previous Stenting Doesn't Affect Outcome of Extensive Endarterectomy for Diffuse Coronary Artery Total Occlusions: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Extensive diffuse coronary artery total occlusions (CTOs) constitute a challenging surgical problem. Extensive coronary endarterectomy (CE) combined with CABG was suggested as a revascularization technique. It was claimed that previous stenting may affect outcome. The present study aimed to report the outcome of LAD endarterectomy for CTO and to determine the effect of previous stenting on this outcome. The present retrospective study was conducted on 194 patients with CTO indicated for left anterior descending artery (LAD) endarterectomy. To reduce the bias related to unbalanced patients selection, propensity score matching analysis was used. According to the propensity score, 194 patients were included in the analysis. They comprised 66 patients with previous stent and 128 patients without previous stent. Patients were followed for a median (range) of 74.0 (6.0-149.0) months. The primary study outcome was LAD graft patency. Other outcome parameters included postoperative complications, hospital and ICU stay, and mortality. Comparison between the studied groups regarding outcome parameters revealed no significant differences regarding graft patency (93.9% versus 89.1%; P = .27), graft survival (median [95% CI]: 134.3 months [127.0-141.5] versus 135.2 months [128.4-142.0]; P = .35), patients' survival (93.9% versus 91.4%) and patients' survival time (median [95% CI]: 132.3 months [125.0-139.5] versus 138.0 months [132.0-144.1]; P = .75]. The present study supports using CE as an adjuvant technique with CABG in patients with TCOs. Patients and methods: The present retrospective study was conducted on 194 patients with CTO indicated for left anterior descending artery (LAD) endarterectomy. To reduce the bias related to unbalanced patients selection, propensity score matching analysis was used. According to the propensity score, 194 patients were included in the analysis. They comprised 66 patients with previous stent and 128 patients without previous stent. Patients were followed for a median (range) of 74.0 (6.0-149.0) months. The primary study outcome was LAD graft patency. Other outcome parameters included postoperative complications, hospital and ICU stay and mortality. Results: Comparison between the studied groups regarding outcome parameters revealed no significant differences regarding graft patency (93.9 % versus 89.1; p=0.27), graft survival [median (95% CI): 134.3 months (127.0-141.5) versus 135.2 months (128.4-142.0); p=0.35], patients' survival (93.9 % versus 91.4 %) and patients' survival time [median (95% CI): (132.3 months (125.0-139.5) versus 138.0 months (132.0-144.1); p= 0.75]. Conclusions: The present study supports use CE as an adjuvant technique with CABG in patients with TCOs.

ST-segment elevation in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause a wide range of cardiovascular diseases, including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and STEMI-mimickers (such as myocarditis, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, among others). We performed a systematic review to summarize the clinical features, management, and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 who had ST-segment elevation. We searched electronic databases from inception to September 30, 2020 for studies that reported clinical data about COVID-19 patients with ST-segment elevation. Differences between patients with and without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) on coronary angiography were evaluated. Forty-two studies (35 case reports and seven case series) involving 161 patients were included. The mean age was 62.7 ± 13.6 years and 75% were men. The most frequent symptom was chest pain (78%). Eighty-three percent of patients had obstructive CAD. Patients with non-obstructive CAD had more diffuse ST-segment elevation (13% versus 1%, p = 0.03) and diffuse left ventricular wall-motion abnormality (23% versus 3%, p = 0.02) compared to obstructive CAD. In patients with previous coronary stent (n = 17), the 76% presented with stent thrombosis. In the majority of cases, the main reperfusion strategy was primary percutaneous coronary intervention instead of fibrinolysis. The in-hospital mortality was 30% without difference between patients with (30%) or without (31%) obstructive CAD. Our data suggest that a relatively high proportion of COVID-19 patients with ST-segment elevation had non-obstructive CAD. The prognosis was poor across groups. However, our findings are based on case reports and case series that should be confirmed in future studies.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11239-021-02411-9.

The Global Limb Anatomic Staging System is associated with outcomes of infrainguinal revascularization in chronic limb threatening ischemia

ObjectiveThe Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) has been proposed to facilitate clinical decision-making regarding revascularization for chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). The purpose of the present study was to define its relationship to the treatment outcomes in CLTI. MethodsConsecutive patients who had undergone peripheral angiography for rest pain or tissue loss from January 2017 to July 2019 at a tertiary referral center with a dedicated limb preservation program were reviewed. Subjects with significant aortoiliac disease, previous infrainguinal stenting or functioning bypass grafts, or GLASS stage 0 were excluded. The GLASS score was assigned from the preintervention angiography findings, and the treating surgeon determined the primary infrapopliteal target artery pathway for the limb at risk. The demographic data, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. ResultsThe study cohort included 167 patients and 194 limbs, of which 175 of 194 limbs (90%) had presented with tissue loss and 149 of 182 limbs (83%) with WIfI (Wound, Ischemia and foot Infection) stage 3 or 4. The GLASS stage was GLASS 1 in 14%, GLASS 2 in 18%, and GLASS 3 in 68%. GLASS 3 anatomy was present in 85% of 52 limbs treated by bypass and 55% of 108 limbs treated by endovascular intervention (EVI; P < .001). Revascularization was not performed in 34 limbs, most of which were GLASS 3 (85%). Immediate technical failure for EVI (ie, failure to establish target artery pathway) occurred exclusively in the setting of GLASS 3 anatomy (n = 13; 22%). After a median follow-up of 10 months, limb-based patency after EVI was significantly lower in GLASS 3 than in GLASS 1 or 2 limbs (42% vs 59%; P = .018). GLASS 3 was associated with reduced major adverse limb events-free survival in both the EVI group (P = .002) and the overall revascularized cohort (P = .001). GLASS 3 was also associated with significantly reduced overall survival, amputation-free survival, and reintervention-free survival. In a Cox proportional hazards model, GLASS 3 (hazard ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-4.24; P = .005) and WIfI wound grade 3 (hazard ratio, 2.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-5.53; P = .010) were independent predictors of reduced major adverse limb events-free survival after revascularization. ConclusionsGLASS stage 3 was strongly associated with major adverse clinical outcomes after revascularization in patients with CLTI.

Trans-urethral snare stent removal: a novel, self-constructed innovation for simultaneous ureteral stent removal and safety guidewire insertion.

Ureteral stent insertion and subsequent removal remains one of the most common procedures performed in endourology. We aimed to evaluate a novel, one-step method, permitting simultaneous stent removal and guidewire passage using a self-constructed suture snare via standard cystoscopy. This method should be used prior to ureteroscopy, in cases of minimal stent encrustation and peri-ureteral mucosal oedema, where identification and subsequent cannulation of the ureteral orifice may be a challenge. A self-constructed suture snare is constructed using an open-ended ureteral catheter to facilitate this novel 'Switch' technique. Operative duration, cost feasibility and potential complications with this novel method were assessed in patients with an indwelling stent duration above 100 days. Age inclusion in this study ranged from 21 to 35 years, with kidney, ureter and bladder scores below 6, in the five patients assessed. Previous ureteral stent indwelling time ranged from 106 to 315 days. Reasons for (pre-stented) ureteroscopy were mostly stone related. The overall recorded procedure time for the Switch technique was successfully performed in less than 96 s (range 68-95 s) in all cases within this series. No procedure-related complications were reported. Utilizing the suture snare, the novel Switch technique was successfully performed in all cases assessed. This method is both time and cost feasible and could be easily utilized in resource-limited areas, regional centres or in cases where a stent grasper is not available, may have malfunctioned or cannot adequately approximate due to distal ureteral stent encrustation.

Antegrade and retrograde in‐stent tibial artery chronic total occlusion recanalization with double kiss crush (DK crush) stenting of previous stent

Below the knee (BTK) peripheral arterial disease often presents with critical limb ischemia (CLI) clinically with involvement of more than one tibial vessels. Drug eluting stent (DES) technology for treatment of BTK disease has shown promising long-term durable results; however, currently only coronary DESs are available for application in the United States. Although coronary bifurcation stenting techniques are backed by extensive data in literature, there is a scarcity of data for the treatment of tibial bifurcation disease. Bifurcation angles in the tibials are similar to those in the coronaries and therefore the same two stent bifurcation technique can be applied in BTK disease. Double Kiss crush (DK crush) stenting has superior outcomes when compared to provisional or culotte stenting in randomized coronary trials (based on Medina classification). We present a case of BTK CLI with tibial bifurcation chronic total occlusion treated with two stent DK crush technique using coronary DES.

Early stent thrombosis confirmed in a cancer patient receiving regorafenib, despite triple antithrombotic therapy: a case report

BackgroundWhile developments in oncology have lengthened survival in patients with cancer, such patients often develop cardiovascular diseases. Thus, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is frequently undertaken in them. Although stent thrombosis remains a fatal complication in stent-based PCI, worldwide consensus panels tend to recommend shorter duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy. This is based on its clinical efficacy that has resulted from technological innovation. However, there is insufficient discussion on the risk of stent thrombosis in cancer patients with coronary artery disease, especially in those undergoing chemotherapeutic regimens that have a risk for thrombosis, such as regimens with the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. Presented here is a case of early stent thrombosis that occurred in a cancer patient on regorafenib, despite the administration of triple antithrombotic therapy.Case presentationA 66-year-old Japanese male patient received regorafenib for metastatic colorectal carcinoma and apixaban for deep vein thrombosis. Coronary angiography revealed severe stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending artery. A sirolimus-eluting stent was implanted, without malapposition and under-expansion, under intravascular ultrasound guidance while administering a triple antithrombotic therapy (aspirin: 100 mg/day, prasugrel: 3.75 mg/day, and apixaban: 5 mg/day). However, he was admitted to the hospital for exacerbation of heart failure 1 month after PCI. Coronary angiography revealed contrastive defects in the previous stent. Optical frequency domain imaging confirmed stent thrombosis. PCI was successfully performed with perfusion balloon long-inflation. Antithrombotic therapy was enhanced (aspirin: 100 mg/day, ticagrelor: 120 mg/day, and apixaban: 10 mg/day) and regorafenib was discontinued permanently. While ischemic events did not occur thereafter, the patient died due to metastatic carcinoma progression.ConclusionsThis case suggests that anti-vascular endothelial growth factor might contribute to early stent thrombosis, despite triple antithrombotic therapy. Further discussion is needed on the surveillance and management of cancer patients with coronary artery disease receiving chemotherapy, which carries a risk of thrombosis.

Most deaths in low-risk cardiac surgery could be avoidable

It is observed that death rates in cardiac surgery has decreased, however, root causes that behave like triggers of potentially avoidable deaths (AD), especially in low-risk patients (less bias) are often unknown and underexplored, Phase of Care Mortality Analysis (POCMA) can be a valuable tool to identify seminal events (SE), providing valuable information where it is possible to make improvements in the quality and safety of future procedures. Our results show that in São Paul State, only one third of AD in low-risk cardiac surgery was related to specific surgical problems. After a revisited analysis, 75% of deaths could have been avoided, which in the pre-operative phase, the SE was related judgment, patient evaluation and preparation. In the intra-operative phase, most occurrences could have been avoided if other surgical technique had been used. Sepsis was responsible for 75% of AD in the intensive care unit. In the ward phase, the recognition/management of clinical decompensations and sepsis were the contributing factors. Logistic regression model identified age, previous coronary stent implantation, coronary artery bypass grafting + heart valve surgery, ≥ 2 combined heart valve surgery and hospital-acquired infection as independent predictors of AD.

P31 Resection of a Large Mycotic Aneurysm of the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery

A 50-year-old Indigenous female, on home haemodialysis, was found to have a large mycotic aneurysm of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery at the site of a previous drug eluting stent. Blood cultures grew methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. She underwent a complex operation involving resection of the mycotic aneurysm, removal of the stent and a coronary artery bypass graft to the distal LAD using the left internal mammary artery. She had a complicated ICU admission with pericardial tamponade on day one post-operatively requiring reopening and removal of clot and type 1 respiratory failure requiring re-intubation on day 10 post-operatively. Once extubated, she developed prolonged hyperactive delirium and significant decline in mobility. Over the course of a six-week hospital admission, she received extensive multidisciplinary care and was discharged for rehabilitation to a peripheral hospital. She made a remarkable recovery and was discharged home after rehabilitation with ongoing follow up with infectious diseases.

Surgical treatment of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and ischaemic heart disease

Presented herein are the results of treatment of 137 patients with infrarenal aneurysms of the abdominal portion of the aorta in a combination with ischaemic heart disease. Severity of lesions to the coronary bed and the risk of cardiac complications were assessed according to the SYNTAX score. Depending on severity of angina pectoris and the clinical course of infrarenal aortic aneurysms, we used different tactical approaches to operative treatment of patients. In a low risk of coronary complications, we performed isolated prosthetic repair or endoprosthetic reconstruction of the abdominal aorta. In patients with haemodynamically significant lesions of the coronary bed and positive non-invasive tests, the first stage consisted in coronary artery bypass grafting or stenting of coronary arteries taking into account the risk of cardiac complications according to the SYNTAX Score. The second stage consisted in prosthetic repair or endoprosthetic reconstruction of the abdominal aorta. The terms of the second stage differed and were determined by the course of abdominal aortic aneurysms. In symptomatic large aneurysms (more than 8 cm), prosthetic repair of the abdominal aorta was carried out within 2 weeks after previous stenting of coronary arteries. Simultaneous myocardial revascularization and abdominal aortic reconstruction were performed only in patients with severe angina pectoris, lesions of the trunk of the left coronary artery, three-vessel lesions of the coronary bed, high risk of cardiac complications according to the SYNTAX Score and a complicated or symptomatic course of an infrarenal aortic aneurysm. During implantation of stent grafts into the abdominal aorta there were neither lethal outcomes nor cardiac complications. In open operations, the 30-day mortality rate amounted to 2.2%, with the 5-year survival rate of 92%.

Chest Pain, Statins, Troponin Elevation, and Myopathy: A Diagnostic and Management Dilemma

A 64-year-old man with known ischemic heart disease and previous myocardial infarction and stent implantation presented to the Emergency Department with bilateral arm pain and chest discomfort with mixed features. He described a dull, central sensation within the chest, which did not radiate to the neck, jaw, or back. Additionally, he had a 3-week history of fatigue and intermittent myalgias, predominantly affecting the shoulders on exertion. Cardiac risk factors included hypertension and hypercholesterolemia.

Coronary blood flow in myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries

Abstract Background Myocardial infarction (MI) is mainly caused by atherosclerotic plaque thrombosis but several registries show that in 1–13% of cases MI occurs in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) utilizing the conventional cut-off of &amp;lt;50% stenosis. MINOCA is generally related to coronary arteries abnormalities (epicardial or microvascular dysfunction – MINOCA-co). However, non-coronary conditions may underlie MINOCA as a consequence of supply-demand mismatch (MINOCA-nco). The TIMI flow gradient (TFG) and the corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) are established methods able to respectively provide a qualitative and semiquantitative estimation of epicardial blood flow at rest. No studies have yet evaluated these indices in patients with MINOCA. Purpose To evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with MINOCA and the angiographic indices in MINOCA-co versus MINOCA-nco. Methods Among all consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiogram at our Centre for MI based on the 4th Definition of Myocardial Infarction, the ones showing &amp;lt;50% coronary artery stenosis were retrospectively analyzed; patients with previous coronary stenting were excluded from the study. According to the presence or absence of pre-specified criteria of supply-demand mismatch (SAP &amp;gt;180 mmHg, DAP &amp;gt;110 mmHg, HR &amp;gt;110 bpm, Hb &amp;lt;6 gr/dl, SatO2 &amp;lt;91% or P/F ratio &amp;lt;300), the study cohort was divided into MINOCA-nco and MINOCA-co, respectively. We defined as slow flow phenomenon a TFG &amp;lt; = 2 and/or a CTFC &amp;gt;40 for the left anterior descending artery, &amp;gt;27 for the right coronary artery and &amp;gt;24 for the left circumflex. Results 453 patients were retrospectively evaluated and 112 (24.7%) met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 68±13.2 years and 41 (36.6%) were males. MINOCA-co was the more prevalent entity accounting for 73 (65.2%) patients while 39 (34.8%) were MINOCA-nco. The two subgroups presented similar baseline characteristics with regards to gender and classic cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes and smoking habit. Peripheral vasculopathy was more prevalent in MINOCA-nco patients (MINOCA-nco=15.4% vs. MINOCAco= 4.2%; p=0.04). Regarding the angiographic indices, there was no statistically significant difference in TFG between subgroups; conversely, the number of patients with a slow flow phenomenon as defined by CTFC was significantly higher in the MINOCA-nco group (MINOCAnco= 25.7% vs. MINOCA-co=9.8%; p=0.039). Conclusions Our data suggest that among patients with MINOCA clinical characteristics were not useful in differentiating between the two disease entities (MINOCA-nco vs. MINOCA-co). However, MINOCA-nco patients had higher coronary flow impairment as evaluated by CTFC. The pathophysiological reason is still not clear; we hypothesized that, in this clinical setting, an increased heart rate, systemic arterial pressure or low oxygen supply might worsen unbalanced coronary perfusion. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke: collaboration between neurologists and cardiologists in a single center

Abstract Background Several randomized trials have indicated a benefit from endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. In some centers, interventional cardiologists with previous large carotid stenting experience can play significant role for this treatment. Objectives We present retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of endovascular treatment of stroke (EVTS) performed by interventional cardiologists in collaboration with neurologists in 46 patients in single center. Methods Between 2014 and 2017 46 consecutive AIS patients underwent EVT, men 69.7% (7 with posterior circulation stroke and 5 with wake-up stroke), with mean age 64.6±13 years and average National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 12.2±5 at presentation. During the same period of time 20 patients, 16 men, at mean age 69.4±12, and NIHSS score 11.8±7 received IVT. In the EVT group two methods were applied: Method 1, Supraselective intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) alone or IAT plus balloon angioplasty (PBA); Method 2, Aspiration with Penumbra aspiration system (PAS) or Combination of PAS plus low dose IAT. Results The mean symptoms onset-to-treatment (needle) time (ONT) in the EVT group was 221.7±121.5 minutes, and 185.5±34.9 in the IVT group (p=0.19T). Conscious sedation and local anesthesia was used in 84.7% of the patients (40), general anesthesia in 15.2%; preprocedural MRI was performed in 58.7% and CT in 71.7% of the patients. In the EVT group successful reperfusion (TICI 2b-3 flow) was achieved in 35 (76.1%) patients: in 73.9% with Method 1 and in 86.7% with Method 2 (p=0.44). Poor or no recanalization (TICI 0–1-2a) was observed in 26.1%. Twenty six of 46 patients (56.5%) treated with endovascular methods and respectively 9 (45%) with IVT demonstrated favorable clinical outcome of mRS score 0–2 at 90 days (p=0.91). The overall 3-month mortality was 15.2%, 13% after EVT and 20% after IVT (p=0.48). Conclusions Our initial experience with EVT of AIS performed by trained cardiologists with carotid experience is encouraging, with a relatively moderate to high rate of successful angiographic recanalization and good clinical results. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Safety and efficacy of an endovascular-first approach to acute limb ischemia

BackgroundThe optimal techniques to manage acute limb ischemia (ALI) remain unclear. Previous reports have suggested that the decreased morbidity and mortality of endovascular approaches are mitigated by the limited technical success rates relative to open or hybrid approaches for ALI. However, these data failed to include newer technologies that might improve the technical success rates. We, therefore, sought to describe the current outcomes for an endovascular-first approach to ALI. MethodsWe performed a single-center, single-arm, retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with ALI from 2015 to 2018. Technical success, limb salvage, survival, patency, and length of stay were quantified using Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis. Cox regression analysis was used to identify the predictors of amputation-free survival. ResultsDuring the 3 years, 60 consecutive patients (39 men [65%]; median age, 65 years) presented with ALI. The Rutherford class was I in 15 patients (25%), IIa in 23 (38%), IIb in 13 (22%), and III in 9 patients (15%). Of the 60 patients, 34 had a history of previous failed ipsilateral revascularization (56%), including open bypass for 8 (13%), endovascular for 8 (13%), and both open and endovascular intervention for 18 (30%). The endovascular-first approach procedures included catheter-directed thrombolysis only (n = 19; 3%), catheter-directed thrombolysis plus aspiration and/or rheolytic thrombectomy (n = 19; 32%), and aspiration and/or rheolytic thrombectomy (n = 16; 26%). Six patients (10%) underwent covered stent placement only. The underlying occlusive process was most often thrombosis of a previous bypass graft or stent in 32 patients (53%), followed by native vessel thrombosis in 15 (25%). ALI had resulted from embolism in 13 patients (21.7%), including 2 (3%) with embolization to occlude a previous bypass graft or stent. Technical success was achieved in 58 patients (97%), with open conversion required in two patients (3%). At 30 days postoperatively, 52 patients (87%) survived, and 53 (88%) had successful limb salvage. Five patients (8%) had required four-compartment fasciotomy. No major hemorrhagic complications developed. The median length of stay overall and in the intensive care unit was 9 days (interquartile range, 4-14 days) and 2 days (interquartile range, 1-5 days), respectively. At 1 year, the KM estimates were as follows: amputation-free survival, 58% ± 0.08%; limb salvage, 74.3% ± 0.07%; and survival, 73.3% ± 0.07%. The 1-year KM estimates for primary and secondary patency were 39.4% ± 0.08% and 78.2% ± 0.07%, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, only age independently predicted for death and/or amputation at the last follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.10; P = .01). ConclusionsThe current endovascular approaches to ALI have high technical success rates. Survival, limb salvage, perioperative complications, and length of stay were similar to those from previous reports of historical open cohorts. Further prospective, appropriately powered, multicenter cohort studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of endovascular vs open approaches to ALI.

Stenting with Acclino (flex) for symptomatic intracranial stenosis as secondary stroke prevention

Background and purposeStroke recurrence is high in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis despite best medical treatment. Based on evidence from past studies using previous stent generations, elective intracranial stenting (eICS)...

Carotid endarterectomy remains safe in high-risk patients

ObjectiveCarotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a proven intervention for stroke risk reduction in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. High-risk patients are often offered carotid stenting to minimize the risk and optimize the outcomes. As a referral center for high-risk patients, we evaluated and analyzed our experience with high-risk CEA patients. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who had undergone CEA at a tertiary referral center. The demographics, indications for surgery, physiologic and anatomic risk factors, intraoperative surgical management, perioperative complications, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. The high-risk physiologic factors identified included an ejection fraction <30%, positive preoperative stress test results, and compromised pulmonary function test results. The high-risk patients included those requiring home oxygen, those with a partial pressure of oxygen of <60 mm Hg, and patients with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second of <30%. The high-risk anatomic factors identified included previous head and/or neck radiation, a history of ipsilateral neck surgery, contralateral nerve palsy, redo CEA, previous ipsilateral stenting, contralateral occlusion, contralateral CEA, nasotracheal intubation, and digastric muscle division. After propensity score matching, patients with and without high-risk physiologic and anatomic factors were compared. The primary outcomes were a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were cranial injury and surgical site infection. ResultsDuring a 10-year period, 1347 patients had undergone CEA at the Cleveland Clinic main campus. Of the 1347 patients, 1152 met the criteria for analysis. Propensity score matching found adequate matches for 424 high-risk patients, with 173 patients having at least one physiologic high-risk factor and 293 at least one anatomic high-risk factor. No significant differences were found in the primary composite outcome or any of its components. Overall, the stroke rate for the standard-risk and high-risk patients was 1.9% and 1.4%, respectively. The high-risk patients were significantly more likely to have experienced a cranial nerve injury, although most were temporary. When patients with one or multiple risk factors were analyzed, no significant difference was found in the primary composite outcome or any of its components. Patients with two or more risk factors were significantly more likely to have experienced a cranial nerve injury, with most being temporary. ConclusionsIn our large series, CEA remained a viable and safe surgical solution for patients with high-risk anatomic and physiologic risk factors, with acceptable stroke, myocardial infarction, and 30-day mortality rates.

Effect of previous coronary stenting on subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes

ObjectivesThe effect of previous coronary stenting on subsequent coronary artery bypass graft is inconclusive. MethodsWe used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Database to retrospectively evaluate patients with multivessel coronary artery bypass graft between January 2000 and December 2013. Overall, 32,335 patients who received coronary artery bypass graft were included, of whom 3028 had previous coronary stenting. Propensity-score matching yielded 2977 cases each for evaluation under the previous stenting and no stenting groups. The 30-day mortality and major adverse cardiac events, including all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, and revascularization, were considered primary outcomes. ResultsThe number of coronary artery bypass grafts decreased per year. However, the percentage of patients who had previous coronary stent implantation before coronary artery bypass graft increased steadily (P for trend <.001), and the average number of stents implanted in a patient also increased per year (P for trend <.001). The previous stent group had a significantly greater 30-day mortality rate than did the no-stent group (7.2% vs 5.0%; odds ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.82). The previous stent group had a greater rate of revascularization (14.4% and 10.0%; subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.74) in the last follow-up at year 13. ConclusionsPrevious coronary stenting before coronary artery bypass graft for multivessel coronary artery disease significantly increased 30-day mortality but did not affect late survival. However, patients who had coronary stenting before coronary artery bypass graft experienced more revascularization events during late follow-up.

Revascularization of a single-kidney occluded stent for renal salvage complicated by guide wire distal artery perforation and reperfusion injury

BackgroundThe complexity of the case, including the rarefied simultaneous occurrence of complications—iatrogenic, as well as reperfusion injury, invite reporting and publication.Case presentationA 39-year-old woman with a single-functioning left kidney, previous left renal artery stenting (RAS), and known hypercoagulopathy was hospitalized for flash pulmonary edema, elevated serum creatinine (9.7 mg/dl), and refractory hypertension. She was subsequently referred to our center [2] for endovascular treatment of acute renal ischemia (AKI) due to RAS occlusion.Periprocedural complications of guide-wire arterial perforation and reperfusion injury resulted in life-threatening hemorrhage.ConclusionsFollowing more than 48 h of hypoperfusion of the left kidney, revascularization of the thrombosed RAS was successfully attempted with selective, trans-catheter thrombolysis, and balloon angioplasty. Ultra-selective, nephron-sparing coil embolization was successfully performed. The patient’s creatinine level decreased to 2.8 mg/dl at 12 days and to 1.5 mg/dl at 3 months. After 1 year of follow-up, the stent remains patent, and the patient is asymptomatic with stable renal function.