Previous Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Research Articles

Evaluation of Cesarean section scar using saline contrast sonohysterography in women with previous Cesarean scar pregnancy.

To evaluate Cesarean scar defects using saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) in women with a history of Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). A cohort of 38 non-pregnant women with a history of CSP treated with combined local and systemic methotrexate was investigated prospectively by SCSH. For the purpose of analysis, they were classified, according to the modified Delphi consensus criteria for CSP in early gestation, into three subgroups based on the depth of the gestational sac herniation in the midsagittal plane. Subgroup A included eight (21.1%) cases, in which the largest part of the gestational sac protruded towards the uterine cavity; Subgroup B included 20 (52.6%) cases, in which the largest part of the gestational sac was embedded in the myometrium; and Subgroup C included 10 (26.3%) cases, in which the gestational sac was located partially outside the outer contour of the cervix or uterus. SCSH revealed that all women in Subgroup C had a uterine niche. The median niche length (P = 0.006) and depth (P = 0.015) were significantly greater in Subgroup C than in Subgroups A or B. The median residual myometrial thickness (RMT) was significantly lower in Subgroup C than in Subgroups A or B (P = 0.006). Women with prior CSP who had a gestational sac protruding beyond the serosal line had a significantly greater niche length and depth, and lower RMT. This knowledge may guide individualized risk counseling. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Clinical efficacy and re-pregnancy outcomes of patients with previous cesarean scar pregnancy treated with either high-intensity focused ultrasound or uterine artery embolization before ultrasound-guided dilatation and curettage: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundCesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) treated with either high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation (HIFU-a) or uterine artery embolization (UAE) combined with ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage (USg-D&C) was effective. However, there is insufficient comparative research evidence on clinical efficacy and subsequent pregnancy outcomes after previous CSP treatment. This study aims to investigate the efficacy, safety, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes of HIFU-a compared to UAE before USg-D&C for the treatment of CSP.MethodsBetween January 2016 and July 2020, a total of 272 patients received the pretreatment with HIFU-a or UAE(HIFU-a group: n = 118; UAE group: n = 154). The clinical characteristics, treatment success rate, postoperative pregnancy rate and outcome of the two groups were compared and analyzed.ResultsThe demographic characteristics of the two groups were similar. After pretreatment, the adverse events rate of HIFU-a group was lower than that of UAE group (10.40% (16/154) vs. 40.70% (48/118), P = 0.00). All patients received the USg-D&C. The HIFU-a group was of less intraoperative blood loss (10.00 (5.00–20.00) vs. 12.50 (5.00–30.00) ml, P = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in success rates. However, the HIFU-a group was of a shorter duration of postoperative vaginal bleeding (12.00 (9.00–13.00) vs. 14.00 (12.00–15.00) days, P = 0.00). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of subsequent pregnancy rates (P = 0.317). However, the recurrent CSP (rCSP) rate in the HIFU-a group was lower than that in the UAE group (7.70% (6/78) vs. 19.70%(13/66), P = 0.03).ConclusionsCSP treated with either HIFU-a or UAE combined with USg-D&C was safe and effective. Although no significant difference was found in the subsequent pregnancy outcomes of the two groups, the rCSP was more common in the UAE group. So, we recommend HIFU-a combined with USg-D&C treatment modality.

Reproductive outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancies treated with uterine artery embolization combined with curettage

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to review the reproductive outcomes of women with a cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) treated with dilation and curettage (D&C) after uterine artery embolization (UAE). Materials and methodsThis was a retrospective study to review women who received UAE followed by D&C for CSP between January 2010 and December 2019 at the Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua in Taiwan. Data were collected from both electronic and paper medical records. Patients were contact via phone call to follow up reproductive outcomes between January 2021 and March 2021. These subsequent reproductive outcomes (including pregnancy rate, secondary infertility rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate, and recurrent CSP rate) were recorded and analyzed. ResultsA total of 53 cases of women who received UAE followed by D&C for CSP were identified. The women's average age was 34.8 ± 5.1 years. The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 6.2 ± 1.1 weeks. The mean level for human chorionic gonadotropin was 23,407.7 ± 29,105.5 mIU/ml. The average of blood loss during D&C was 19.2 ± 43.6 ml. The average hospitalization time after D&C was 3.5 ± 1.1 days. Of the 53 cases, 10 patients were lost to follow-up and 43 patients agreed to follow-up on reproductive outcomes in 2021. Twenty-three patients who desired to conceive were analyzed. Nineteen out of these 23 women (82.6%) succeeded in conceiving again and gave birth to 15 healthy babies (78.9%). Only one woman (1/19, 5.3%) experienced recurrence of CSP. The average time interval between previous CSP treatment and subsequent conception was 10.4 ± 6.7 months. ConclusionUAE combined with curettage treatment in CSP patients results in a positive rate of subsequent pregnancy outcomes. This minimally invasive procedure may be considered as one of the treatment options for CSP, as it enables preservation of fertility after treatment.

Single-dose methotrexate-based protocol for the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy and successive pregnancy outcomes

The incidence of caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) increases in recent years. Yet, the best mode of treatment and its effects on successive pregnancies is not well established. The aim of this study was to investigate the success rate of single-dose methotrexate (MTX) in the management of CSP, and the outcomes of subsequent pregnancies in a retrospective cohort study. All women who were treated for CSPs between the years 2011 and 2019 were included. Treatment included systemic MTX and ultrasound-guided needle aspiration (UGNA) in cases with active foetal heartbeat. Overall, 34 women were diagnosed with CSP, of whom 31 were treated with systemic MTX. Twelve patients (38.7%) needed additional curettage or hysteroscopy. The only identified risk factor for failure of MTX-based treatment was time interval between the previous caesarean delivery and CSP (22 vs 34 months, p = 0.04). Twelve women had a subsequent pregnancy. Five pregnancies ended in term delivery, three in preterm delivery, three in abortion and one woman had a recurrent CSP. The study conclusion is that a single dose MTX with UGNA in cases of active heartbeat is an effective mode of treatment in cases of CSP with good sequential pregnancy outcomes. Longer time interval from the previous caesarean delivery was identified as a risk factor for failure of conservative management.

Recurrent Cesarean scar pregnancy: case series and literature review.

To determine the rate of recurrent Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) in our clinical practices and to evaluate whether the mode of treatment of a CSP is associated with the risk of recurrent CSP, as well as to review the published literature on recurrent CSP. We performed a retrospective search of our six obstetric and gynecological departmental ultrasound databases for all CSPs and recurrent CSPs between 2010 and 2019. We extracted various data, including number of CSPs with follow-up, number of cases attempting and number achieving pregnancy following treatment of CSP and number of recurrent CSPs, as well as details of the treatment of the original CSP. After analyzing the clinical data, we evaluated whether the mode of treatment terminating the previous CSP was associated with the risk of recurrent CSP. We also performed a PubMed search for: 'recurrent Cesarean scar pregnancy' and 'recurrent Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy'. Articles were reviewed for year of publication, and extraction and analysis of the same data as those obtained from our departmental databases were performed. Our database search identified 252 cases of CSP. The overall rate of clinical follow-up ranged between 71.4% and 100%, according to treatment site (mean, 90.9%). Among these, 105 women had another pregnancy after treatment of the previous CSP. Of these, 36 (34.3%) pregnancies were recurrent CSP, with 27 women having a single recurrence and three women having multiple recurrences, one with two, one with three and one with four. We did not find any particular single or combination treatment mode terminating the previous CSP to be associated with recurrent CSP. The literature search identified 17 articles that yielded sufficient information for us to evaluate their reported prevalence of recurrent CSP. These reported 1743 primary diagnoses of CSP, of which 944 had reliable follow-up. Data were available for 489 cases that attempted to conceive again after treatment of a previous CSP, and on the 327 pregnancies achieved. Of these, 67 (20.5%) were recurrent CSP. On the basis of our pooled clinical data and review of the literature, recurrent CSP is apparently more common than was previously assumed based upon mostly single-case reports or series with few cases. This should be borne in mind when counseling patients undergoing treatment for CSP regarding their risk of recurrence. We found no obvious causal relationship or association between the type of treatment of the previous CSP and recurrence of CSP. Patients who become pregnant after treatment of a CSP should be encouraged to have an early (5-7-week) first-trimester transvaginal scan to determine the location of the gestation. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Subsequent Fertility in Women Treated for Caesarean Scar Pregnancy With Hysteroscopy: A 5-Year Follow-Up Descriptive Study in a Tertiary Hospital.

ObjectiveThe outcomes of subsequent pregnancies and fertility in women with a history of caesarean scar pregnancy have not been well described. In this study, we followed up 149 women with a history of caesarean scar pregnancy and analysed the effect on their fertility.Methods149 women with a history of caesarean scar pregnancy were followed up for five years. Of them, 53 women had unprotected sexual intercourse attempting to become pregnant again. Data including clinical parameters and treatment options at the time of diagnosis of caesarean scar pregnancy, and the outcomes in subsequent pregnancy were collected. In addition, a questionnaire about the menstrual cycle after treatment was voluntarily completed by these women.ResultsOf the 53 women, 46 (84%) women had a subsequent pregnancy, while seven (14%) women did not. There was no association between the clinical parameters in previous caesarean scar pregnancy or treatment and future fertility. From the questionnaire, there was no difference seen in the length of the menstrual cycle and menses between the two groups. However, a higher number of women with light menstrual bleeding were seen in women without a subsequent pregnancy (67%), compared with women who did (28%). In addition, six women (13%) who had a subsequent pregnancy experienced foetus death in the first trimester.ConclusionWe reported that 14% of women with a history of cesarean scar pregnancy did not have a subsequent pregnancy, after unprotected sexual intercourse for more than two years. Light menstrual bleeding after treatment may be associated with this adverse effect. Our findings need to be further investigated with large sample size.

Evaluation of treatment of previous cesarean scar pregnancy with methotrexate: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundPrevious caesarean scar pregnancy is one type of ectopic pregnancy in myometrium and fibrous tissue of previous caesarean scar. One of the therapeutic methods of this type of ectopic pregnancy is treatment with methotrexate. Given various findings on the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy with methotrexate and lack of global report in this regard, we aimed to achieve a global report on the treatment of CSP with methotrexate through related literature review and analysis of the results of the studies, to enable more precise planning to reduce complications of CSP.MethodThis review study extracted information through searching national and international databases of SID،, Embase, ScienceDirect, ، Scopus, ، PubMed, Web of Science (ISI) between 2003 and January 2020. To perform the meta-analysis, random-effects model and heterogeneity of the studies with I2 index were investigated. Data were sanalysed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 2.ResultsIn total, 26 articles with a sample size of 600 individuals were enrolled in the meta-analysis. According to the results of the study, the mean level of β-hCG was 28,744.98 ± 4425.1 mIU/ml before the intervention and was 23,836.78 ± 4533.1 mIU/ml after the intervention. The mean intraoperative blood loss (ml) was 4.8 ± 3.76 ml, mean hospital stay (days) was 11.7 ± 1.2 days, mean time for serum-hCG normalization (days) was 41.6 ± 3.2 days, success was 90.7% (95% CI: 86.7–93.5%), and complication was 9% (95% CI: 6.3–12.8%).ConclusionThe results of the current study show methotrexate significantly reduces β-hCG levels and can be effective in treating caesarean scar pregnancy and its complications.

Early first-trimester transvaginal ultrasound is indicated in pregnancy after previous Cesarean delivery: should it be mandatory?

Early first-trimester transvaginal ultrasound is indicated in pregnancy after previous Cesarean delivery: should it be mandatory?

Caesarean scar pregnancy: time to explore indications of the caesarean sections?

A retrospective study was conducted in women with history of a caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) to explore the possible causative mechanisms. Over a period of 40 months, a total of 16,926 deliveries and 3554 caesarean sections (CS) occurred in our hospital. Nine cases of CSP were identified at an incidence of 1:1880 births and 0.25% of all CS. Analysis of the indications of the previous CS revealed that 88.8% of women with known indication had undergone CS without labour. Out of them, 75% underwent CS at preterm gestation and 25% had term elective procedure for breech presentation. Of the patients, 77.7% had multiple CS. Conservation of the uterus was possible in 77.7% of patients utilising non-radical forms of treatment. As most of the women underwent CS with a non-contractile uterus without labour, we believe that the risk of CSP may be related to the indications of the previous CS as the number of CS alone could not explain the occurrence of CSP. It is time to explore this area so that screening strategies can be developed to detect CSP at the earliest possible gestation and to prevent life-threatening complications such as uterine rupture and severe hemorrhage. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? A caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a life-threatening condition that can result in uterine rupture and in severe haemorrhage. Although the diagnostic criteria for the CSP have been established, the risk factors that favour the condition are not well understood. We know that the incomplete healing of the lower uterine segment (LUS) from poor vascularisation can create a microscopic dehiscent tract through which the blastocyst enters the myometrium. Some have postulated that the healing processes following the elective procedures, such as for breech deliveries performed in a non-developed LUS, might facilitate this process. What do the results of this study add? In this study, analysis of the indications of the previous CS revealed that majority of women with a known indication had undergone CS without labour, either at preterm gestation or term elective procedure for breech presentation. We have postulated the possible causative mechanisms in relation to the physiology of LUS development. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that has looked specifically at the relationship between the indications of previous CS and CSP. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Further studies exploring the indications of the previous CS are recommended so that early first-trimester screening strategies can be generated towards this subgroup of patients to detect CSP at the earliest possible gestation.

EP17.08: Evaluate of the LSCS scars in the uterus using 2‐dimensional (2D) and 3‐dimensional (3D) ultrasound

Lower segment Caesarean section (LSCS) scars are always seen on ultrasound examinations in patients who had undergone LSCS delivery. It is located at the site of hysterotomy, on the lower anterior wall of corpus or anterior wall of the uterine isthmus, upper anterior wall of cervix and also mid-uterine body. This study is to evaluate the LSCS scars in the uterus using 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound. 120 women who turned up for gynecological examinations were recruited. The scars were evaluated using the following techniques: (i) 2D ultrasound on sagittal, transverse planes and oblique planes, (ii) 3D volume was collected for all patients. Offline evaluation 3D rendering with multiplanar and surface modes were performed. HDlive silhouette enhancement was also utilised (iii) there were also few collections with cine clips. 40 women were in menstrual phase, 30 women is proliferative phase and 50 women in secretory phase of the cycle. 87 LSCS scars were located on lower anterior wall, 10 at lower anterior wall and extending to internal os, and 11 at upper anterior wall of cervix. 80 scars are well-heated, 5 of them had calcifications, Scars defects which presented as fluid-filled areas were detected in 33 women. The defects presented with different shapes – triangle, semicircle, irregular, oval, tubular (fistula) and round (inclusion cysts). The 3D rendering provided additional information from the coronal plane. In 6 women, the scars were like a communicating network of channels. There were two fistulas in the cohort. In one of the fistula, the cine clip showed sliding movements of the walls of the fistula. 3 women had previous Caesarean scar pregnancy. Two of them had scar defects at lower anterior wall and one at internal os. 20 women also complained of dysmenorrhea. Ultrasonography is effective in characterisation of LSCS scars, providing useful information for clinicians.

Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study

To investigate risk factors for infertility and recurrent cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) after previous CSP. A retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1). University hospital. Between January 2007 and April 2016, a total of 650 patients were included, all diagnosed with CSP and treated by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and uterine artery embolization (UAE), followed by suction curettage under hysteroscopic guidance. None. Follow-up of the reproductive outcomes ended in June 2017. A total of 135 of the 650 patients with CSP were involved in the study, among whom 32 became infertile, 78 had an intrauterine pregnancy, and 25 had recurrent CSP after previous CSP. Age (≥35 years; odds ratio [OR], 4.252; p = .002), β-human chorionic gonadotropin (≤5000 mIU/mL; OR, 3.778; p = .011), and longer duration of amenorrhea (>56 days; OR, 2.507; p = .05) were risk factors for infertility. Treatment with UAE (OR, 5.796; p = .003), more abortions (≥4; OR, 2.851; p = .022), and being asymptomatic (OR, 4.175; p = .039) were risk factors for recurrent CSP. There was no statistically significant difference in the subsequent outcomes of pregnant women in the HIFU and UAE groups (p >.05). More attention should be given to subsequent reproductive outcomes after CSP, not only for intrauterine pregnancy, but also for infertility and recurrent CSP. Early diagnosis and treatment of CSP could reduce the risk of infertility and recurrent CSP. HIFU seemed to be superior to UAE in reducing the risk of recurrent CSP. Patients with CSP should adhere to strict contraception if they do not desire more children.

Reproductive outcomes following women with previous cesarean scar pregnancy

Objective: To investigate the reproductive outcomes after the previous cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). Methods: The clinical data of 138 patients with CSP in Tianjin Medical University General Hospital from January 2011 to March 2016 were collected and analyzed.Fifty-four cases underwent uterine artery embolization+ dilation & curettage (UAE+ D&C) surgery, 41 cases underwent D&C surgery, and 43 cases underwent laparoscopic surgery.Reproductive outcomes were followed up and analyzed. Results: All women were followed up for (46±17) months.It was encouraging that 37 women got 42 spontaneous pregnancies among 50 women with fertility plan, and the subsequent spontaneous pregnancy rate was 74.0%(37/50). Unfortunately, 6 women experienced recurrence of CSP (RCSP) in the subsequent pregnancies, and the RCSP rate was 14.3%(6/42). There were no significant differences with regard to spontaneous pregnancy rate and RCSP rate among the 3 groups (P>0.05). Nineteen women had led to a live delivery indeed without the presence of placenta previa, placenta accrete, uterine rupture and postpartum hemorrhage in the perinatal period. Conclusion: The reproductive outcomes following the previous CSP include the intrauterine pregnancy, spontaneous abortion and RCSP.The individualized treatments on CSP had no significant differences to the subsequent spontaneous pregnancy rate which was favorable in the future fertility plan.The incidence of RCSP was not significantly reduced by laparoscopic uterine scar repair.The risk of RCSP appeared to be increased in the subsequent pregnancies, and early diagnosis and treatment were needed to exclude the abnormal CSP.The overall perinatal outcomes were favorable.

Ectopic Pregnancy in Previous Caesarean Scar, Management with Methotrexate and Hysteroscopy

Ectopic Pregnancy in Previous Caesarean Scar, Management with Methotrexate and Hysteroscopy

Reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy – a case series and review of the literature

ObjectiveTo assess the reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) in our center and review of published literature on CSP and subsequent reproductive issues. MethodsOver a 3-year period, 28 cases of CSPs were diagnosed in our hospital. Follow up data of 22 cases were available which included the gestational age at diagnosis of CSP, treatments employed and outcomes of previous cesarean scar pregnancy. We also had details on subsequent fertility outcomes in these women, which included intervals between the previous CSP and subsequent pregnancy, maternal and neonatal outcomes of these subsequent pregnancies and mode of delivery. ResultsEight women desired to conceive and amongst them, seven women manage to conceive spontaneously. There were five pregnancies delivered at term, two miscarriages and one recurrent CSP. One patient had placenta accreta diagnosed at cesarean section at term and had massive hemorrhage. The remaining 4 term pregnancies were delivered uneventfully by elective cesarean sections. The mean interval between the cesarean scar pregnancy and subsequent pregnancy was 24.6 months (range 9–48 months). One patient experienced secondary infertility and despite thorough investigations, no abnormalities were detected. One of the women who did not desire future fertility conceived spontaneously at 9 and 18 months respectively after one CSP and had induced abortions twice. There were 3 women who had uterine scar defect repaired, only 1 resulted in a live birth but had placenta accreta with a lower uterine segment defect and suffered from massive hemorrhage, one woman had a subsequent miscarriage with a diverticulum in the lower uterine segment, and one woman had unexplained secondary infertility. ConclusionMost women were able to conceive following CSPs. Reproductive outcomes included normal intrauterine term pregnancy, miscarriage, recurrent CSP, and infertility. Placenta accreta, which could be misdiagnosed antenatally, was a serious complication in subsequent pregnancies. Diverticulum or defect in the lower uterine segment could happen after CSP. Repair of the uterine defect, following a CSP neither guaranteed the healing of the scar, nor the ability to ensure a safe pregnancy outcome. Appropriate counseling to women desiring fertility with a history of CSP is essential and once they conceive early referral to tertiary centers for follow up is pertinent.

Reproductive outcomes after previous cesarean scar pregnancy: Follow up of 189 women

ObjectiveTo investigate the reproductive and pregnancy outcomes of women after previous Cesarean Scar Pregnancy. Materials and methodsFrom January 2009 to December 2013, a total of 214 patients with CSP received surgical evacuation treatment by means of dilation and suction evacuation and local resection of the ectopic gestational mass. A telephone follow-up was conducted every year after CSP treatment. The follow-up was ended on December 2014. ResultsTwenty-five patients were lost to follow-up due to loss of contacts. The previous medical records of the remaining 189 women were reviewed. Fifty-eight women wished to give birth again. However, 48 (82.8%, 48/58) of them stopped the attempts to get pregnant because they were afraid of recurrent CSP and the high risk of uterine rupture during the subsequent pregnancy. The other 10 women spontaneously attempted to get pregnant again, among whom 6 (60%, 6/10) succeeded with the birth of 7 healthy babies. A total of 32 women conceived again, either in plan or by chance. Five women (15.6%, 5/32) experiencing recurrent CSP. ConclusionEven though our result did not necessarily represent the true recurrence rate, our study provided some evidence about the likelihood of fertility and recurrence risk for future pregnancies after previous CSP.

The Rendez-vous technique for treatment of caesarean scar defects: a novel combined endoscopic approach

A caesarean scar defect is a late complication of caesarean birth with a wide range of prevalence between 56 and 84% depending on which diagnostic tool and which definition is used. The referred symptoms which include postmenstrual spotting and infertility are fortunately rare. Moreover, severe complications such as caesarean scar pregnancy and uterine rupture in the following pregnancy may occur. Given the increasing incidence of caesarean births, the potential morbidity associated with caesarean scars is likely to become more important. Recently, a few repair techniques were described in the literature including the hysteroscopic resection of scarred tissue or the laparoscopic repair with or without robotic assistance. Between June 2009 and February 2014, 21 women with caesarean scar defects were operated with the Rendez-vous technique, a minimally invasive surgery combining the laparoscopic and hysteroscopic approach. Data were retrospectively collected. The indications for this surgery included secondary infertility, previous caesarean scar pregnancy, recurrent miscarriage and postmenstrual spotting. Prior to operation, a transvaginal ultrasound was performed to examine the uterine wall defect. The patient characteristics are provided in Table 1. In all cases, the operation was successfully completed laparoscopically. The median operation time was 125 min. One case was complicated by recurrence of the scar defect 6 weeks after the operation. No other intra- or post-operative complications were observed, and the median in-patient stay was 3 days. The benefits of the technique include the feasibility and safety of the procedure, the "Halloween sign" (Fig. 1) which indicates the exact extent and localization of the scar defect and the immediate assessment of repair through the hysteroscopy at the end of the surgery. However, before further studies evaluate the efficacy of this method, the routine repair of caesarean scar defects cannot be recommended. A video of the technique is presented.

A Report of Four Cases of Caesarean Scar Pregnancy in a Period of 24 Months

Abstract The implantation of a pregnancy within the scar of a previous caesarean delivery is the rarest of ectopic pregnancy locations. If it is diagnosed early, treatment options are capable of preserving the uterus and subsequent fertility. Objective: Pregnancy in previous caesarean scar is the rarest form of ectopic pregnancy. We aimed to present 4 cases of caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy and assess the potential role of three dimensional ultrasonography in the diagnosis. Design: We report 4 cases of caesarean scar pregnancies; one of them was initially mistaken for a viable intrauterine pregnancy. Results: 2 cases had transcervical aspiration of the gestational sac and two by open surgery. One underwent hysterectomy and the other laparotomy and excision of the pregnancy located in the CS scar. Conclusions: We report on four cases of caesarean scar pregnancy with different modes of treatment. The three dimensional ultrasound improved visualisation of the caesarean scar pregnancy. Care should be taken in the diagnosis of caesarean scar twin pregnancy by a transvaginal ultrasonography in order to not mistake a caesarean scar pregnancy for an intrauterine pregnancy.

Laparoscopic repair of uterine scar dehiscence after previous cesarean scar pregnancy: A case report.

Laparoscopic repair of uterine scar dehiscence after previous cesarean scar pregnancy: A case report.

Fertility Performance and Obstetric Outcomes Among Women With Previous Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

The purpose of this study was to assess fertility performance and obstetric outcomes after treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. We conducted a retrospective study in a large tertiary hospital in Israel. The study included 18 women with a diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy between 2000 and 2009. The incidence of cesarean scar pregnancy among our parturient patients was 1 per 3000 for the general obstetric population and 1 per 531 among those with at least 1 cesarean delivery. Sixteen were treated primarily with methotrexate. Two were treated primarily by surgery, and 2 more were treated by surgery after failed methotrexate treatment. After cesarean scar pregnancy treatment, 7 women conceived spontaneously, and 1 conceived by in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The remaining 10 (55%) did not wish to conceive again. Two of the women who became pregnant (25%) had recurrent cesarean scar pregnancy. This study shows encouraging results for fertility performance and obstetric outcomes after treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Nevertheless, the risk of recurrent cesarean scar pregnancy is not negligible.

Subsequent pregnancy outcome after conservative treatment of a previous cesarean scar pregnancy

To assess pregnancy course and outcome after conservative treatment of a cesarean scar pregnancy. During an 8-year period, 15 cases of cesarean scar pregnancies were diagnosed at our institution. Seven of the 14 patients for whom we successfully preserved the uterus became pregnant within 3 years after termination of the scar pregnancy. The year of diagnosis, conservative method and gestational age for these five patients were recorded. Delivery method, time interval between the scar pregnancy and subsequent pregnancy, and maternal and neonatal outcome were evaluated. Seven pregnancies (eight live and one dead baby) were noted. The mean interval between the ectopic pregnancy and subsequent pregnancy was 13.3 months (range 0-34 months). One patient, who became pregnant 3 months after the scar pregnancy was found, suffered uterine rupture at 38.3 weeks' gestational age. Two patients with placental accrete, and one of them who continued the existing intrauterine twin pregnancy after transvaginal sono-guided aspiration of the scar pregnancy received a cesarean hysterectomy at 32 weeks of gestation. The remaining four pregnancies were uneventful, followed by early cesarean sections at 36 weeks. The results of this first series of seven subsequent pregnancies after conservative treatment of scar pregnancies are promising. An early cesarean section before over-extension of the uterus and spontaneous labor can help to prevent uterine rupture. Placenta accrete is another severe morbidity of these patients in addition to uterine rupture. Thus a cesarean hysterectomy may be the choice of treatment.