Negative Pressure Wound Therapy In Prevention Research Articles

Does Preventive Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) reduce local complications following Lymph Node Dissection (LND) in the management of metastatic skin tumors?

Axillary and inguinal lymph node dissection (LND) are performed in metastatic skin tumors with several local complications, such as lymphorrhea, lymphoceles, and lymphedema. The purpose of this study is to determine whether negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) applied as a preventive measure could improve outcomes. A monocentric study included patients who underwent axillary or inguinal LND from May 2010 to March 2020, with a retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data. Patients were divided into two groups: the conventional wound care (CWC) and the NPWT groups. Patients were systematically reviewed at D7, D30, and at 1 year postoperative, and data regarding lymphorrhea, lymphoceles, and lymphedema were collected. A total of 109 axillary and inguinal LND were performed. NPWT was applied on 68 LND and CWC on 41 LND. The variables, diabetes, smoking, gender, associated treatments, and primary pathology (melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or Merkel tumors) were similar in both groups. Analyses have shown a significant difference in the rate of scar disunion during the first month between the two groups (p=0.045 between D1 and D7; p=0.011 between D8 and D30), as well as the presence of lymphorrhea (p=0.000 between D1 and D7; p=0.002 between D8 and D30). The rate of lymphoedema was significantly reduced in the NPWT group versus CWC (p=0.000 between D8 and D30; p=0.034 between D31 and 1 year). NPWT reduces local complications (scar disunion, lymphorrhea, and lymphedema) during the first year following LND in the management of node metastatic skin tumors.

Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy for Prevention of Sternal Wound Infection after Adult Cardiac Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The results of current studies are not conclusive on the efficacy of incisional negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for the prevention of sternal wound infection (SWI) after adult cardiac surgery. A systematic review of the literature was performed through PubMed, Scopus and Google to identify studies which investigated the efficacy of NPWT to prevent SWI after adult cardiac surgery. Available data were pooled using RevMan and Meta-analyst with random effect models. Out of 191 studies retrieved from the literature, ten fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. The quality of these studies was judged fair for three of them and poor for seven studies. Only one study was powered to address the efficacy of NPWT for the prevention of postoperative SWI. Pooled analysis of these studies showed that NPWT was associated with lower risk of any SWI (4.5% vs. 9.0%, RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34–0.84, I2 48%), superficial SWI (3.8% vs. 4.4%, RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.29–1.36, I2 65%), and deep SWI (1.8% vs. 4.7%, RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26–0.74, I2 0%), but such a difference was not statistically significant for superficial SWI. When only randomized and alternating allocated studies were included, NPWT was associated with a significantly lower risk of any SWI (3.3% vs. 16.5%, RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.08–0.62, I2 0%), superficial SWI (2.6% vs. 12.4%, RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06–0.69, I2 0%), and deep SWI (1.2% vs. 4.8%, RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03–0.95, I2 0%). This pooled analysis showed that NPWT may prevent postoperative SWI after adult cardiac surgery. NPWT is expected to be particularly useful in patients at risk for surgical site infection and may significantly reduce the burden of resources needed to treat such a complication. However, the methodology of the available studies was judged as poor for most of them. Further studies are needed to obtain conclusive results on the potential benefits of this preventative strategy.

Use of incisional preventive negative pressure wound therapy in open incisional hernia repair: Who benefits?

Complex surgery of abdominal wall hernia continues to bear the major concern of wound healing disorders. Technical modifications have not been able to sufficiently prevent wound healing impairments or infections, even in clean elective cases, especially when dealing with large-scale hernia defects. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) in its intentional use as a preventive tool has recently found its way from theoretical and experimental advantages to the clinical routine. Different indications have been defined but evidence is lacking. We performed a retrospective analysis (1/2014-5/2019) of all ventral hernia repairs (n=386) done in our institution as open sublay mesh reinforcement, partially requiring component separation (CS), receiving iNPWT in selected cases based on single surgeon experience. Pre- and perioperative data included patient and hernia characteristics as well as the employed mesh sizes. Postoperative follow-up (median 38.5months [interquartile range: 23.4, 53.3]) extended beyond patient dismissal and included the rate of re-admission due to wound healing disorders. The primary outcome was the incidence of surgical site occurrences (SSO). Secondary endpoints included wound-related readmissions, reoperations and recurrences. Patients were matched based on propensity scores in a 1:1 ratio. Propensity scores were calculated based on five preoperative variables, including sex, body-mass-index, American Society of Anesthesiology classification, recurrent hernia repair and operation technique, to identify significant parameters. The rate of SSO was 12% (n=46) for all operated cases, and the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) was 8.8% (n=34). In the subgroup of CS (n=40), the rate increased to 15% (n=6). The usage of iNPWT (n=54) led to an in-hospital SSO rate of 14.8% (n=8) but increased to 33.3% (n=18) when including the re-admission rate. The SSI rate for the iNPWT cohort was 14.8% (n=8) with a consecutive need for reoperation (Clavien-Dindo IIIb) in 87.5% (n=7). In the matched-pair analysis, the hernia-size and mesh-size were the main risk factors for SSO. The use of iNPWT significantly reduced this statistical effect (p=0.405). In a large and representative patient cohort, we were able to demonstrate that the advantage of iNPWT used after complex abdominal wall repair does not come first hand. Especially in the follow-up, we found a relevant increase in wound healing problems after dismissal. To proof the benefit of iNPWT in these heterogeneous patients, we could identify hernia size and mesh size as individual risk factors that were nihilated by the use of iNPWT. We found it to be favourable to use iNPWT when mesh-size exceeded 450 cm2 .

Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy for prevention of surgical site infection in abdominal surgery: a nationwide cross-sectional survey

Our objective was to determine current practice in Switzerland regarding the use of pNPWT in abdominal surgery. An online survey was carried out to evaluate the use of pNPWT among abdominal surgeons in Switzerland. One hundred and ten participants replied to the survey from 16.12.2019 to 15.01.2020. Eleven were excluded, leaving 99 responders for analysis. Seventy participants (70.7%) were using pNPWT, 3 (3%) have stopped using it and 26 (26.3%) have never used it. pNPWT was used on midline laparotomy by 63 responders (90%), closed stoma wounds by 21 (30%), closed perineal wounds by 20 (28.6%), Pfannenstiel incisions by 18 (23.7%), groin incisions by 16 (22.9%), subcostal incisions by 13 (18.6%), Mc Burney incisions by 3 (4.3%) and other incisions by 18 (25.7%). Forty-eight participants (68.6%) used pNPWT on less than 10% of patients, 14 (20%) on 10–25% of patients, six (8.6%) on 25–50% of patients and two (2.9%) on 75–100% of patients. Suggestions for improvement to pNPWT were: better sealing, recyclable system, better adaptation to the perineum, smaller device, reduced cost and possibility to check the surgical wound through the dressing. In conclusion, pNPWT is widely used among Swiss surgeons, mostly on midline incisions. However, most of them apply pNPWT on a small proportion of patients only. Suggestions for improvement were a better sealing for complex wounds, reduced cost and possibility to check the wound during the therapy.

A phase 3 randomized controlled trial of preventive negative pressure wound therapy in postoperative incision management

Objective: The aim of this study was to test whether preventive negative pressure wound therapy decreases the incidence of wound complications in patients of any weight or in those with morbid obesity and benign disease undergoing laparotomy for gynecologic malignancy.

Evaluation of negative-pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections after ileostomy closure in colorectal cancer patients: a prospective multicenter study.

Surgical site infection (SSI) occurs at a high rate after ileostomy closure. The effect of preventive negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on SSI development in closed wounds remains controversial. We conducted a prospective multicenter study to evaluate the usefulness of preventive NPWT for SSI after ileostomy closure. From January 2018 to November 2018, 50 patients who underwent closure of ileostomy created after surgery for colorectal cancer participated in this study. An NPWT device was applied to each wound immediately after surgery and then treatment was continued for 3days. The primary endpoint was 30-day SSI, and the secondary endpoints were the incidence of seroma, hematoma, and adverse events related to NPWT. No patients developed SSI, seroma, or hematoma. Adverse events that may have been causally linked with NPWT were contact dermatitis in two patients and wound pain in one patient, and there were no cases of discontinuation or decompression of NPWT. The use of NPWT following ileostomy closure may be useful for reducing the development of SSI in colorectal cancer patients. This is a prospective multicenter pilot study and we are planning a comparative study based on these successful results. Registration number: UMIN000032053 ( https://www.umin.ac.jp/ ).

The role of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of pilonidal disease

Pilonidal disease is a particularly difficult disorder to treat. Guidelines and recommendations for the treatment of pilonidal disease neglects the use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), but studies strongly support the role of NPWT in prevention of surgical site infection in high-risk groups.
 During a webinar on the pilonidal disease, we asked 51 participants to complete a questionnaire about the treatment of pilonidal disease. They answered questions about the way they treat their patients with pilonidal disease, and about using NPWT.
 The study showed that relatively large number of surgeons use NPWT to treat patients with pilonidal disease, the majority of them are satisfied at maintaining the tightness and effectiveness of a vacuum dressing and would use the single-use NPWT systems, if they was more available. It seems that the NPWT in the pilonidal disease is increasingly used and this method is gaining more and more popularity.

Effectiveness of Preventive Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Postoperative Wound Management in Cases of Lower Gastrointestinal Perforation

Effectiveness of Preventive Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Postoperative Wound Management in Cases of Lower Gastrointestinal Perforation

An Investigation into the Efficacy of Preventive Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Lower Gastrointestinal Perforation

An Investigation into the Efficacy of Preventive Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Lower Gastrointestinal Perforation

Negative-pressure wound therapy for prevention and treatment of surgical-site infections after vascular surgery.

Indications for negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in vascular surgical patients are expanding. The aim of this review was to outline the evidence for NPWT on open and closed wounds. A PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library search from 2007 to June 2016 was performed combining the medical subject headings terms 'wound infection', 'abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)', 'fasciotomy', 'vascular surgery' and 'NPWT' or 'VAC'. NPWT of open infected groin wounds was associated with shorter duration of wound healing by 47 days, and was more cost-effective than alginate dressings in one RCT. In one RCT and six observational studies, NPWT-related major bleeding and graft preservation rates were 0-10 and 83-100 per cent respectively. One retrospective comparative study showed greater wound size reduction per day, fewer dressing changes, quicker wound closure and shorter hospital stay with NPWT compared with gauze dressings for lower leg fasciotomy. NPWT and mesh-mediated fascial traction after AAA repair and open abdomen was associated with high primary fascial closure rates (96-100 per cent) and low risk of graft infection (0-7 per cent). One retrospective comparative study showed a significant reduction in surgical-site infection, from 30 per cent with standard wound care to 6 per cent with closed incisional NPWT. NPWT has a central role in open and infected wounds after vascular surgery; the results of prophylactic care of closed incisions are promising.

Preventive NPWT over closed incisions in general surgery: Does age matter?

Surgical site events (SSE), including surgical wound complications and surgical site infections, are a major concern in patients undergoing general surgery operations. These increase the costs of care, and can lead to prolonged hospital stay and need for further treatments, ultimately resulting in poor quality of life. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been recently reported as a preventive strategy to avoid SSE, but little is known on the topic, and particularly in geriatric population.Our primary aim was to assess the efficacy of NPWT by means of a pocket device (PICO, Smith & Nephew, London, UK) in preventing SSE compared with conventional dressings in patients undergoing surgery with primary wound closure for breast and for colorectal diseases in our Unit. Our secondary aims were to assess the efficacy and safety of PICO in elderly patients, and to seek for differences between breast and abdominal results.All consecutive patients undergoing breast and colorectal surgery in our Unit between September 2012 and May 2014 were prospectively enrolled in this open label controlled study. Breast patients receiving NPWT were assigned to group B1, those receiving conventional dressings were assigned to group B2. Colorectal patients were assigned to group C1 (NPWT) and C2 (conventional dressings) in similar fashion. Each group included 25 patients, and at least 10 (40%) patients aged over 65 years to allow sub-analyses.NPWT significantly reduced SSE in both breast and colorectal patients compared with controls. No significant differences were observed according to age. Similar benefits were observed in breast and colorectal patients.Our results suggest that PICO is an effective tool to prevent SSE in patients undergoing general surgery, irrespective of age. Its use is recommended in frail, elderly patients at risk of SSE.

Einsatz einer präventiven, epikutanen Unterdrucktherapie (Prevena™) bei offener Korrektur von Deformitäten der vorderen Brustwand reduziert das Auftreten von Wundheilungsstörungen

Pectus surgery can lead to postoperative wound complications in some cases. The purpose of this study is to determine whether preventive negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) could reduce wound complications after open pectus surgery. 100 patients after open procedure for the treatment of pectus excavatum or pectus carinatum in the years 2010 to 2012 were retrospectively analysed. 50 patients treated with Prevena™ (KCI Medical Products GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany) were compared with 50 patients whose wounds were covered with OPSITE® film (Smith & Nephew, Hamburg, Germany). Wound closure was performed following a standard procedure as well as the placement of subcutaneous drains. Therefore two comparable groups of patients were formed and analysed by standardised parameters. The wound dressing was placed epicutaneously immediately after wound closure in the operating room and removed after 5 days in each case. Follow-ups were performed immediately after removal of the wound dressing, at the time of discharge from hospital as well as 6 and 12 weeks after operation. The wounds were checked for tenderness, pain, secretion, redness and fistulas. The Prevena group showed 10 % wound complications which needed operative treatment, whereas the OPSITE group showed complications in 24 %. Some patients who were treated with Prevena showed superficial skin lesions at the rim of the foam and the film. All of these lesions healed well. Treating wounds postoperatively with preventive measures (NPWT) showed a remarkable reduction of wound complications following open pectus surgery whereas statistically the difference was not significant (p = 0.074).