Preventive Analgesia Research Articles

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study.

Background The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided (USG) subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and quadratus lumborum (QL) block as preventive analgesia methods after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods A total of 120 patients, 18–75 years of age, were separated into 2 groups preoperatively. Patients in group TAP (n = 60) received 0.3 ml/kg bupivacaine with USG bilateral subcostal TAP block; patients in group QL (n = 60) received 0.3 ml/kg bupivacaine with USG bilateral QL block. Patients were assessed 24 h postoperatively, and pain scores, time to first analgesia requirement, total analgesia dose, and postoperative complications during the first 24 h were recorded. Results Fifty-three patients in group TAP and 54 in group QL were ultimately evaluated. No statistically significant difference was found in at rest and dynamic visual analog scale scores between the groups. There was also no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to total analgesia consumption. Although the duration of anesthesia was significantly longer in group QL, no statistically significant difference was found in the duration of surgery between the groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions Results of this study demonstrated that USG subcostal TAP and QL blocks similarly reduced postoperative pain scores and analgesia consumption, with high patient satisfaction. However, subcostal TAP block could be considered preferable to QL block because it can be applied easily and in a shorter time.

Factors affecting phantom limb pain in patients undergoing amputation: retrospective study.

The efficacy of preemptive analgesia for prevention of phantom limb pain has been controversial although pain management before amputation is empirically important. The aim of this study was to determine the associated factors with perioperative phantom limb pain. Following approval by the Medical Ethics Committee in our university, medical records of patients receiving limb amputation surgery in our hospital between April 1, 2013 and October 31, 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. To determine which pre-operative factors could affect the development of phantom limb pain, we performed univariate analysis to find candidate factors (p < 0.05), and then did multivariate regression analysis. Incidence of phantom limb pain was 50% (22/44). There was no difference between the groups in types of anesthesia and post-operative pain levels. The multivariate logistic regression including possible confounders suggested that diabetes mellitus and uncontrollable preoperative pain with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were independently associated with the development of phantom limb pain (Adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.238 [95% confidential interval (CI) 0.0643-0.883], p = 0.032, Adjusted OR 6.360 [95% CI 1.280-31.50], p = 0.024, respectively). The types of anesthesia and the degree of postoperative pain were not related to the development of phantom limb pain. The present data suggest that insufficient preoperative pain with NSAIDs and diabetes mellitus would give an impact on the development of phantom limb pain.

The effect of various multimodal analgesia regimens during surgical treatment of patients with spinal stenosis on the rate of failed back surgery syndrome

To determine the effect of various methods of perioperative analgesia on the rate of failed back surgery syndrome in patients operated on for spinal stenosis. A total of 122 patients were operated on for spinal stenosis in 2010-2016. The patients were assigned to groups according to the type of received analgesia: Group K (n=19) underwent analgesia on-demand. Patients in the PMA group (n=21) received preventive multimodal analgesia (PMA) with ketoprofen, paracetamol and morphine. Patients in the PMA+PG (n=20) and PMA+N (n=20) groups additionally received pregabalin and nefopam, respectively. Patients in the PMA+E group (n=22) received continuous epidural analgesia with a combination of ropivacaine and morphine. In patients in the PMA+I group (n=20), the wound was infiltrated with ropivacaine and ketorolac. In Group K, analgesia was not adequate during five postoperative days. Analgesia with PMA resulted in significant pain reduction during three postoperative days compared to Group K. Wound infiltration in addition to PMA was followed by more significant pain relief during six postoperative hours (compared to the PMA group). Administration of pregabalin or nefopam, as well as epidural analgesia, did not improve quality of postoperative analgesia. Five to seven months after the surgery, 66% (57; 75%) of patients had low back and/or leg pain; 41% (32; 50%) of patients had leg pain. Among patients suffering from pain, 32-41% patients had the severe chronic pain syndrome that resulted in sleep disorder, disability and significant deterioration of quality of life. The rate of failed back surgery syndrome did not depend on the perioperative analgesia regimen.

Pre-emptive and preventive opioids for postoperative pain in adults undergoing all types of surgery.

Postoperative pain is a common consequence of surgery and can have deleterious effects. It has been suggested that the administration of opioid analgesia before a painful stimulus may improve pain control. This can be done in two ways. We defined 'preventive opioids' as opioids administered before incision and continued postoperatively, and 'pre-emptive opioids' as opioids given before incision but not continued postoperatively. Both pre-emptive and preventive analgesia involve the initiation of an analgesic agent prior to surgical incision with the aim of reducing intraoperative nociception and therefore postoperative pain. To assess the efficacy of preventive and pre-emptive opioids for reducing postoperative pain in adults undergoing all types of surgery. We searched the following electronic databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, and CINAHL (up to 18 March 2018). In addition, we searched for unpublished studies in three clinical trial databases, conference proceedings, grey literature databases, and reference lists of retrieved articles. We did not apply any restrictions on language or date of publication. We included parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only. We included participants aged over 15 years old undergoing any type of surgery. We defined postincision opioids as the same intervention administered after incision whether single dose (as comparator with pre-emptive analgesia) or continued postoperatively (as comparator with preventive analgesia) (control group). We considered studies that did and did not use a double-dummy placebo (e.g. intervention group received active drug before incision and placebo after incision; control group received placebo before incision and active drug after incision). We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcomes were: early acute postoperative pain (measured within six hours and reported on a 0-to-10 scale) and respiratory depression. Our secondary outcomes included: late acute postoperative pain (24 to 48 hours and reported on a 0-to-10 scale), 24-hour morphine consumption, and adverse events (intraoperative bradycardia and hypotension). We used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence for each outcome. We included 20 RCTs, including one unpublished study with 1343 participants. Two studies were awaiting classification as the full text for these studies was not available. One study evaluated pre-emptive opioids, and 19 studies evaluated preventive opioids. We considered only one study to be at low risk of bias for most domains. The surgeries and opioids used varied, although roughly half of the included studies were conducted in abdominal hysterectomy, and around a quarter used morphine as the intervention. All studies were conducted in secondary care.Pre-emptive opioids compared to postincision opioidsFor pre-emptive opioids in dental surgery, there may be a reduction in early acute postoperative pain (mean difference (MD) -1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.75 to -0.65; 40 participants; 1 study; low-quality evidence). This study did not report on adverse events (respiratory depression, bradycardia, or hypotension). There may be a reduction in late acute postoperative pain (MD -2.10, 95% CI -2.57 to -1.63; 40 participants; 1 study; low-quality evidence). This study did not report 24-hour morphine consumption.Preventive opioids compared to postincision opioidsFor preventive opioids, there was probably no reduction in early acute postoperative pain (MD 0.11, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.53; 706 participants; 10 studies; I2 = 61%; moderate-quality evidence). There were no events of respiratory depression in four studies (433 participants). There was no important reduction in late acute postoperative pain (MD -0.06, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.01; 668 participants; 9 studies; I2 = 0%; moderate-quality evidence). There may be a small reduction in 24-hour morphine consumption (MD -4.91 mg, 95% CI -9.39 mg to -0.44 mg; 526 participants; 11 studies; I2 = 82%; very low-quality evidence). There may be similar rates of bradycardia (risk ratio (RR) 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.88; 112 participants; 2 studies; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence) and hypotension (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.25 to 4.73; 88 participants; 2 studies; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). Due to the low quality of the evidence, we are uncertain whether pre-emptive opioids reduce postoperative pain. Based on the trials conducted thus far, there was no clear evidence that preventive opioids result in reductions in pain scores. It was unclear if there was a reduction in morphine consumption due to very low-quality of evidence. Too few studies reported adverse events to be able to draw any definitive conclusions. Once assessed, the two studies awaiting classification may alter the conclusions of the review.

Preventive Multimodal Analgesia Versus Morphine in Cancer Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgeries

AbstractBackground: Opioids are the corner stone for perioperative analgesia in major surgeries. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of preventive multimodal analgesia versus morphine on post-operative pain and total morphine consumption.Aim of Study: To compare the efficacy of preventive multimodal analgesia versus morphine in cancer patients undergoing major abdominal surgeries.Patients and Methods: This prospective randomized study was done from March 2018 to September 2018 after approval of the institutional board review of National Cancer Institute. Forty cancer patients were randomly allocated in the study; patients were divided into 2 groups; multimodal group (n=20) received Ketamine, magnesium, ketorolac, paracetamol, with TAB (transverse abdominis plane) block before surgical incision and morphine group (n=20) received morphine sul-phate 0.1mg/kg before surgical incision.Results: There was statistically significant difference in intraoperative fentanyl consumption p-value (<0.001) and total morphine consumption in the first 24 hours postopera-tively p-value (0.001) between the 2 studied groups being higher in the morphine group.Conclusion: Preventive multimodal analgesia has superior analgesic profile than morphine regarding perioperative analgesia and morphine consumption in the first 24 hours post-operatively.

The comparison of effectiveness of two variants of preventive anesthesia/analgesia in cancer surgery

Despite modern drugs and technologies in medicine, the questions of adequate analgesia in the postoperative period remain quite relevant. The effectiveness of preventive analgesia in the perioperative period remains a contentious issue.&#x0D; The study included 53 oncosurgical patients. Gr.1 received dexketoprofen in combination with paracetamol for perioperative analgesia before the operation, Gr.2 the same medication was given before closing the operating wound. Anesthesia in both groups included an inhaled (Sevoran) and an extended epidural.&#x0D; The study showed that the pain intensity on ANI monitoring and the total dose of fentanyl was less in Gr.1, compared to Gr.2. Cortisol plasma level and the level of glycemia in the perioperative period were less in patients in Gr.1 than in Gr.2. Pain intensity after surgery during first postoperative day was lower in Gr.1, then in Gr.2.&#x0D; The administration of multimodal analgesia with paracetamol and dexketoprofen prior to the surgical interventions provides for the best quality of perioperative analgesia in oncological surgical interventions.

The clinical effect of enhanced recovery after surgery to tibial plateau fractures patients applied arthroscopic minimally invasive treatment

Objective To explore and analyze the clinical effect of enhanced recovery after surgery to tibial plateau fractures patients applied arthroscopic minimally invasive treatment. Methods A total of 60 tibial plateau fractures patients were selected in our orthopedics department from January 2016 to July 2017 and who applied arthroscopic minimally invasive treatment, according to the last two-digit number of patient ID, divided them into observation group (n=30) and control group (n=30) randomly. The control group used regular perioperative strategies. The observation group used multidisciplinary cooperation fast track surgery idea, through preoperative assessment and education, nutrition and fasting, advance pre-rehabilitation and preventive analgesia; intraoperative optimization of anesthesia, body fluid management and body temperature control; postoperative nutritional support, multimodal analgesia, early ambulation and rehabilitation exercises, implied standardized and professional perioperative overall optimization management. The differences of the condition of 6 h, 12 h, 24 h after surgery, VAS score on discharge, time of first ambulation, active knee flexion 120° days; self-care ability at discharge and AKSS score one month after surgery between 2 groups were compared. Results The VAS scores 6 h, 12 h, 24 h after surgery and at discharge were 4.48±1.18, 3.81±1.68, 3.05±1.63, 2.65±1.65 in the observation group, and were 5.45±1.15, 4.15±1.05, 3.71±1.15, 3.23±1.68 in the control group. The differences were statistically significant (t= 0.796~0.902, P<0.05). The time of first ambulation, active knee flexion 120°days, self-care ability at discharge and AKSS scores one month after surgery were (5.61±1.4) hours, (4.01±1.1) days, 80.22±3.6, 71.89±6.56 and 64.13±6.15 in the observation group, and (35.8±8.1) hours, (6.82±1.6) days, 64.25±3.8, 63.45±8.36 and 60.95±8.98 in the control group. The differences were statistically significant (t=2.789~10.200, P<0.05). Conclusion Enhanced recovery after surgery to tibial plateau fractures patients applied arthroscopic minimally invasive treatment is worthy of being popularized as it’s beneficial to tibial plateau fractures patients. It can also fasten recovery and improve quality of life for postoperative patients. Key words: Enhanced recovery after surgery; Arthroscopy; Fracture of tibial plateau; Perioperative management

Perioperative predictors of moderate and severe postoperative pain in idiopathic scoliosis patients following spinal correction and fusion operations.

To investigate the predictive factors of pain intensity during the first 48 hours after spinal correction and fusion operations for idiopathic scoliosis patients.A total of 290 scoliosis patients who underwent posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion operations were enrolled in this study. A standard surgical and analgesic method was implemented for all participants and pain intensity was evaluated at fixed times within 48 hours after the operation. Variables including demographics (age, sex, body mass index [BMI], patient sources), surgical variables (procedure, duration of operation), intraoperative variables (total transfusion, autologous transfusion, heterogeneous transfusion, fluid intake, use of preventive analgesia) were investigated.On univariate analysis, BMI, transfusion type and not implementing preventive analgesia were associated with more serious pain after a scoliosis correction operation. Multivariate analysis indicated that receiving heterogeneous transfusion and not implementing preventive analgesia were significant predictive factors for moderate and severe pain after the spinal correction operation.Our research indicated that the type of transfusion and preventive analgesia were significantly associated with the severity of pain. Body mass and patient sources should be considered before surgery. For patients under high risk of moderate and severe pain, the type of transfusion must be taken into consideration. This study explored the influencing factors of postoperative pain from a novel perspective, but some limitations existed in this present study, and future studies are needed.

Lidocaine infusions and preventative analgesia: can the answer to our prayers be hiding right under our noses?

Lidocaine infusions and preventative analgesia: can the answer to our prayers be hiding right under our noses?

Acute pain and peripheral sensitization following cautery disbudding in 1- and 4-week-old calves

Acute pain and peripheral sensitization development after cautery disbudding was investigated in 33 calves administered preventive multimodal analgesia. The animals were assigned randomly to three groups: 1) Group SH (Control), undergoing sham disbudding at 1 and 4weeks of age; 2) Group ED (Early Disbudding), undergoing disbudding at 1week of age and sham disbudding at 4weeks of age; 3) Group LD (Late Disbudding), undergoing sham disbudding at 1week of age and disbudding at 4weeks of age. Physiological parameters (heart rate, respiratory rate, rectal temperature, invasive blood pressure, cortisol, β-endorphin, interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α and haptoglobin plasmatic concentration), local variables (tactile sensitivity score, pressure pain thresholds and horn temperature), behavior and pain scores [multidimensional pain scale and visual analogue scale (VAS)] were assessed at baseline and at several pre-determined time points until 24h after disbudding. Tactile sensitivity score significantly and equally increased in both groups ED and LD and pressure pain thresholds significantly decreased in group LD until 24h after disbudding compared to group SH. Pain and VAS scores significantly and equally increased in both groups ED and LD until 24h after disbudding compared to group SH. No significant differences in physiological parameters, behavior and horn temperature were detected among groups. The present study suggests that acute pain and peripheral sensitization develop and do not differ in calves disbudded at 1week and 4weeks of age. Moreover, the use of physiological and behavioral parameters as sole indicators of acute pain might lead to improper conclusions and should be reassessed.

Value of perioperative multimodal stratified analgesia guided by PPRS-CYMZ 2.0

Objective To evaluate the value of perioperative multimodal stratified analgesia guided by PPRS-CYMZ 2.0. Methods One hundred and sixteen patients of both sexes, aged 16-85 yr, of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ-Ⅲ, scheduled for elective surgery in our hospital in August 2016, were included in this study and assigned into empirical analgesia group(group E, n=79)and stratified analgesia group(group S, n=73). The risk of postoperative pain was estimated by an experienced associate chief anesthesiologist based on his clinical experience, and the perioperative analgesic protocol was determined in group E. The risk of postoperative pain was assessed using the perioperative pain risk scale PPRS-CYMZ 2.0 by another experienced associate chief anesthesiologist, the risk was stratified according to the scores, and the corresponding stratified analgesic protocol was determined in group S. Visual analog scale scores and parents′satisfaction with analgesia were recorded on postoperative day 30.The requirement for preventive analgesia, total pressing times of patient-controlled analgesia(PCA)pump in 0-6 h, 6-24 h and 24-72 h periods, PCA background infusion dose and consumption of rescue analgesics were recorded.The development of adverse events during postoperative hospital stay and postoperative recovery were also recorded.Analgesia-related parameters of medical economics were calculated. Results There was no significant difference in postoperative pain risk stratification between group E and group S(P>0.05), and the majority of patients were at moderate risk.Compared with group E, no significant change was found in visual analog scale scores on postoperative day 30, PCA background infusion dose or incidence of postoperative adverse effects(P>0.05), the requirement for preventive analgesia and satisfaction scores were significantly increased in high risk patients, the consumption of rescue analgesics was decreased in moderate risk patients(P 0.05), the total pressing times of PCA pump was significantly decreased, and the direct analgesic cost per patient and total analgesic cost were decreased in moderate and high risk patients, and the first ambulation time and length of postoperative hospital stay were shortened in high risk patients in group S(P<0.05). Conclusion PPRS-CYMZ 2.0 can achieve perioperative multimodal stratified analgesia and individualized treatment. Key words: Analgesia; Pain, postoperative; Risk assessment

Postoperative pain management in the postanesthesia care unit: an update.

Acute postoperative pain remains a major problem, resulting in multiple undesirable outcomes if inadequately controlled. Most surgical patients spend their immediate postoperative period in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), where pain management, being unsatisfactory and requiring improvements, affects further recovery. Recent studies on postoperative pain management in the PACU were reviewed for the advances in assessments and treatments. More objective assessments of pain being independent of patients’ participation may be potentially appropriate in the PACU, including photoplethysmography-derived parameters, analgesia nociception index, skin conductance, and pupillometry, although further studies are needed to confirm their utilities. Multimodal analgesia with different analgesics and techniques has been widely used. With theoretical basis of preventing central sensitization, preventive analgesia is increasingly common. New opioids are being developed with minimization of adverse effects of traditional opioids. More intravenous nonopioid analgesics and adjuncts (such as dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone) are introduced for their opioid-sparing effects. Current evidence suggests that regional analgesic techniques are effective in the reduction of pain and stay in the PACU. Being available alternatives to epidural analgesia, perineural techniques and infiltrative techniques including wound infiltration, transversus abdominis plane block, local infiltration analgesia, and intraperitoneal administration have played a more important role for their effectiveness and safety.

Preventive Analgesia: An Evidence-Based Alternative for Dentistry

The effective management of pain in dentistry increases the patient satisfaction, improves the treatment outcome and reduces the cost of care. To achieve this goal, different strategies are available for the administration of analgesics, such as preventive analgesia. The aim of this approach is to minimize sensitization induced by noxious perioperatory stimuli (both pre, intra and postoperatory). Available research support the favorable effect of preventive analgesia, although it also recognizes an important lack of high quality evidence to confirm its advantages. This new perspective article summarizes the preventive analgesia protocol, and its potential use in dentistry.

Clinical values of multimodal preventive analgesia in patients with partial hepatectomy for liver cancer

Objective: To investigate the clinical values of multimodal preventive analgesia in patients with partial hepatectomy for liver cancer. Methods: A perspective study was conducted to collect data of patients with liver cancer who underwent partial hepatectomy from March 2014 to March 2015.The 90 patients involved in the study were randomly divided into two groups as multimodal analgesia and control groups, and each group had 45 cases. In multimodal analgesia group, 40 mg parecoxib sodium was injected intravenously 30 minutes before anesthetic induction, and 0.375% ropivacaine 150 mg combined with dexamethasone 5 mg were applied to transversus abdominis plane block before closing abdomen.The patients in control group without above treatment. Patient controlled intravenous analgesia was used in all patients. Three days after surgery, 40 mg parecoxib sodium was injected intravenously, twice a day for all patients.Visual analogue scales (VAS) was used to evaluate postoperative pain, and postoperative adverse events were observed.The number of cases of postoperative ambulation (>6 h for every day), time of flatus and defecation, and duration of hospital stay were recorded in two groups.Pearson chi-square test was used to compare the rate or constituent ratio between two groups.Independent sample t test or Mann-Whitney U was used to analyzed the measurement data between two groups. Results: There were no difference between two groups in aging, gender, weight, body mass index, ASA classification, blood loss volume, time of operation(all P>0.05). The scores of VAS in multimodal analgesia group was significantly lower than that in control group(3.0±0.8 vs. 4.6±1.1, t=7.814, P<0.01 for day 1; 2.2±1.0 vs. 3.6±1.2, t=5.825, P<0.01 for day 2; 1.6±0.8 vs. 2.4±1.2, t=3.894, P<0.01 for day 3). The number of cases of postoperative ambulation(>6 h) in multimodal analgesia group was significantly more than that in control group (10 cases vs. 0 case, χ(2)=11.250, P<0.01 for day 1; 21 cases vs. 5 cases, χ(2)=13.846, P<0.01 for day 2; 28 cases vs. 17 cases, χ(2)=5.378, P =0.020 for day 3). The time of flatus and defecation, and duration of hospital stay were significantly shorter than that in control group((30.2±7.3) hours vs. (36.4±7.0)hours, t=4.115, P<0.01 for flatus; (50.9±5.2)hours vs. (60.7±7.3)hours, t=7.346, P<0.01 for defecation; (6.2±0.8)days vs. (9.6±1.1)days, t=16.615, P<0.01 for hospital stay). Conclusion: Multimodal preventive analgesia effectively alleviate the postoperative pain, benefits early ambulation, improves recovery of gastrointestinal function, and shortens duration of hospital stay in patients with partial hepatectomy for liver cancer.

A Prospective, Observational Study to Evaluate the Role of Gabapentin as Preventive Analgesic in Thyroidectomy under General Anesthesia.

Background:Effective management of postoperative pain is a part of well-organized perioperative care, which helps in reduced morbidity and improved patient satisfaction. Preventive analgesia can reduce acute and chronic pain by blocking the noxious inputs to pain pathways, preventing sensitization. Studies have reported efficacy of gabapentin as a preventive analgesic in perioperative pain. In this study, we aimed to determine whether preoperative gabapentin reduced postoperative pain and tramadol consumption after thyroidectomy under general anesthesia.Materials and Methods:Sixty patients scheduled for thyroidectomy were allocated to two groups of thirty each for this prospective, observational study. Patients in Group A and Group B received oral gabapentin 600 mg (6 × 10−4 kg) and diazepam 10 mg (1 × 10−5 kg), respectively, 2 h prior to surgery. Tramadol was given as rescue analgesic for postoperative pain with a verbal rating score of two. The analgesic efficacy of preoperative gabapentin was assessed in terms of postoperative pain scores at rest or swallowing, time to first rescue analgesic, and total tramadol consumption for 24 h. Ramsay sedation score and side effects of drug were also looked into.Results:Postoperative pain scores and total tramadol consumption were significantly lower in Group A during 24 h (P = 0.00). Time to first rescue analgesic was significantly prolonged in Group A (P = 0.001). Side effects were comparable.Conclusion:Oral gabapentin is effective as a preventive analgesic in reducing postoperative pain and tramadol consumption after thyroidectomy under general anesthesia.

An Update on Drugs Used for Lumbosacral Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia in Dogs.

This review aims to report an update on drugs administered into the epidural space for anesthesia and analgesia in dogs, describing their potential advantages and disadvantages in the clinical setting. Databases searched include Pubmed, Google scholar, and CAB abstracts. Benefits of administering local anesthetics, opioids, and alpha2 agonists into the epidural space include the use of lower doses of general anesthetics (anesthetic “sparing” effect), perioperative analgesia, and reduced side effects associated with systemic administration of drugs. However, the potential for cardiorespiratory compromise, neurotoxicity, and other adverse effects should be considered when using the epidural route of administration. When these variables are considered, the epidural technique is useful as a complementary method of anesthesia for preventive and postoperative analgesia and/or as part of a balanced anesthesia technique.

Propofol produces preventive analgesia via GluN2B-containing NMDA Receptor/ERK1/2 Signaling Pathway in a rat model of inflammatory pain.

Propofol, an intravenous anesthetic, has been shown to offer superior analgesic effect clinically. Whether propofol has preventive analgesic property remains unexplored. The present study investigated the antinociceptive effect of propofol and underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms via pre-emptive administration in a formalin-induced inflammatory pain model in rats. Male adult Sprague–Dawley rats were randomly allocated into four groups: naïve (Group Naïve), formalin injection only (Group Formalin), and formalin injection at 30 min (Group P-30 min) or 2 h (Group P-2 h) after intravenous infusion of propofol (0.6 mg kg−1 min−1) for 1 h. Nociceptive responses and protein expression of phosphorylated- or pan-GluN2B, ERK1/2, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase in the spinal dorsal horn were evaluated. Alteration of intracellular Ca2+ concentration induced by N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor agonists with or without pre-treatment of propofol was measured using fluorometry in SH-SY5Y cells while neuronal activation in the spinal dorsal horn by immunofluorescence. Pre-emptive propofol reduced pain with a delayed response to formalin and a reduction in hypersensitivity that lasted at least for 2 h. The formalin-induced activation of spinal GluN2B and ERK1/2 but not p38 or c-Jun N-terminal kinase was also diminished by propofol treatment. Preconditioning treatment with 3 µM and 10 µM of propofol inhibited Ca2+ influx mediated through NMDA receptors in SH-SY5Y cells. Propofol also reduced the neuronal expression of c-Fos and p-ERK induced by formalin. This study shows that pre-emptive administration of propofol produces preventive analgesic effects on inflammatory pain through regulating neuronal GluN2B-containing NMDA receptor and ERK1/2 pathway in the spinal dorsal horn.

Durerea acută postoperatorie

Acute postoperative pain is a personal unpleasant sensory and emotional experience with negative physiological and psychological effects. Severe acute pain may increase postoperative morbidity and mortality and is a risk factor for chronic pain incidence. We evaluate pain intensity using pain scales. Pain management includes preventive analgesia who interacts and modulates central sensitization response and multimodal analgesia which uses two or more different analgesic mechanisms agents for a superior analgesic effect. Effective pain management provide early postoperative recovery and decrease the incidence of chronic pain.

Evaluation of central (neuraxial) blocks effectiveness in patients with obesity and reducing of coronary flow reserve at abdominal delivery

The study was conducted to determine the most efficient and safe option of regional anesthesia applied abdominal delivery in obese patients (BMI - 35-39,9 kg/m2) and reduced coronary flow reserve. The study included 63 women. Depending on the anesthesia all the patients were divided into 3 groups. 1st group consisted of 21 women operated under spinal anesthesia, 2nd similar number of patients operated on epidural anesthesia, 3rd - 21 women operated on a balanced epidural anesthesia reduce the concentration of the local anesthetic combined with fentanylum and preventive analgesia. At the same time on the stages of anesthesia and surgery was studied central and peripheral hemodynamics, functional state of the sympathetic-adrenal and hypothalamic-pituitary system. It was found that the most efficient and safe way of pain relief in patients with obesity and reduced coronary flow reserve is reduced concentrations of epidural bupivacaine hydrochloride combined with fentanylum and preventive analgesia.

Peripheral KATP activation inhibits pain sensitization induced by skin/muscle incision and retraction via the nuclear factor-κB/c-Jun N-terminal kinase signaling pathway.

The aim of the current study was to assess the effect of pinacidil activation of ATP‑sensitive potassium (KATP) channels prior to skin/muscle incision and retraction (SMIR) surgery on peripheral and central sensitization, and investigate molecular interferential targets for preventive analgesia. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to one of the following five groups: Control, incision (sham surgery), incision plus retraction (SMIR) group, SMIR plus pinacidil (pinacidil) group and the SMIR plus pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC) group. The rats in the pinacidil and PDTC groups were intraperitoneally injected with pinacidil or PDTC, respectively, prior to the SMIR procedure. The mechanical withdrawal threshold (MWT) was determined. Western blotting was performed to detect the alterations in the subunits of the KATP channels, Kir6.1 and SUR2, levels of nuclear factor‑κB (NF‑κB) in the tissue around the incision and c‑Jun N‑terminal kinase (JNK) in the spinal cord. There was a significant increase observed in the levels of NF‑κB and JNK following SMIR surgery compared with the control group, and a significant reduction in MWT and the levels of Kir6.1 and SUR2. Additionally, intraperitoneal administration of pinacidil inhibited the reduction in MWT, and Kir6.1 and SUR2 levels. SMIR was observed to result in increases in the levels of NF‑κB and JNK. In addition, in the PDTC group, the alterations in MWT, NF‑κB, JNK, Kir6.1 and SUR2 resulting from SMIR were blocked. The results of the current study suggest that the deteriorations in the microenvironment resulting from the SMIR procedure can induce peripheral and central sensitization, and that the activation of peripheral KATP by pinacidil prior to SMIR is able to inhibit peripheral and central sensitization via the NF‑κB/JNK signaling pathway, thus resulting in preventive analgesia.