Study objectives: The National Institutes of Health National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines recommend chronic use of controller medications such as inhaled corticosteroids for all persistent asthmatic patients (step II or higher). Previous studies have demonstrated poor compliance with controller medication use in emergency department (ED) asthmatic patients. The purpose of this study is to determine whether discharging patients with a written asthma action plan from the ED will improve long-term compliance with controller medications. Methods: A prospective, grant-funded study of ED wheezing patients has been in place since November 2002. In phase II of this study, prospectively enrolled wheezing patients older than 12 months were treated for acute wheezing in an unrestricted fashion. For those discharged from the ED, parents were given a written asthma action plan along with other optional educational tools such as an asthma educational video while in the ED. Patients were later contacted by telephone to assess use of controller medications. Results: Of the 719 encounters (596 subjects) enrolled in phase I, 68 (9%) had written asthma action plans. Three hundred ninety-five encounters were assessed as persistent (step II or higher), and of these, 15% were using controller medications correctly, 12% were using controller medications intermittently, and 73% were not receiving controller medications. Two hundred forty-six patients were interviewed by telephone 2 to 4 weeks after the ED visit, and of these, 14% were using controller medications and 86% were not. The ED encounter alone failed to increase the appropriate use of controller medications. Among the first 160 patients enrolled in phase II, only 15 patients had written asthma action plans at the ED visit. One hundred fifty-two patients received a color-coded written asthma action plan on ED discharge, which clearly recommends inhaled corticosteroids even during well periods (color coded as green). For the 78 patients assessed as persistent asthmatics (step II or higher), the appropriate use of controller medications improved 2 to 4 weeks later, assessed during a telephone interview compared with controller medication use before the ED visit as follows: using controller medications appropriately (41% versus 18% previously), using controller medications intermittently (13% versus 21% previously), and not using controller medications at all (46% versus 62% previously). Conclusion: Appropriate controller medication compliance rates have increased with the interventions initiated in phase II of this study. The most consistent intervention in this cohort is a written asthma action plan provided from the ED. Although the long-term management of a chronic disease such as asthma is more optimally managed by primary care physicians, asthmatic patients who utilize the ED might have poorer access to or poorer compliance with primary care, and for these reasons, methods to improve long-term controller medication compliance can be enhanced by educational tools such as written asthma action plans provided by the ED and are faster and preferable.