Prevention Of Migraine In Adults Research Articles

Nonspecific oral medications versus anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for migraine: Asystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

To compare calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) versus nonspecific oral migraine preventives (NOEPs). Insurers mandate step therapy with NOEPs before approving CGRP mAbs. Databases were searched for class I or II randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CGRP mAbs or NOEPs versus placebo for migraine prevention in adults. The primary outcome measure was monthly migraine days (MMD) or moderate to severe headache days. Twelve RCTs for CGRP mAbs, 5 RCTs for topiramate, and 3 RCTs for divalproex were included in the meta-analysis. There was high certainty that CGRP mAbs are more effective than placebo, with weighted mean difference (WMD; 95% confidence interval) of -1.64 (-1.99 to -1.28) MMD, which is compatible with small effect size (Cohen's d -0.25 [-0.34 to -0.16]). Certainty of evidence that topiramate or divalproex is more effective than placebo was very low and low, respectively (WMD -1.45 [-1.52 to -1.38] and -1.65 [-2.30 to -1.00], respectively; Cohen's d -1.25 [-2.47 to -0.03] and -0.48 [-0.67 to -0.29], respectively). Trial sequential analysis showed that information size was adequate and that CGRP mAbs had clear benefit versus placebo. Network meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between CGRP mAbs and topiramate (WMD -0.19 [-0.56 to 0.17]) or divalproex (0.01 [-0.73 to 0.75]). No significant difference was seen between topiramate or divalproex (0.21 [-0.45 to 0.86]). There is high certainty that CGRP mAbs are more effective than placebo, but the effect size is small. When feasible, CGRP mAbs may be prescribed as first-line preventives; topiramate or divalproex could be as effective but are less well tolerated. The findings of this study support the recently published 2024 position of the American Headache Society on the use of CGRP mAbs as the first-line treatment.

Real-life experiences with galcanezumab and predictors for treatment response in Turkey

BackgroundThe complexity of clinical practice extends far beyond the controlled settings of trials, and there is a need for real-world studies aimed at identifying which patients will respond to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in different countries. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab in treating migraine in a real-life setting in Turkey, as well as identify predictors of treatment response.MethodsA total of 476 patients who diagnosed with migraine according to ICHD-3 criteria and treated with galcanezumab by headache specialists were voluntarily participated in this cross-sectional study. Galcanezumab is indicated for the prevention of migraine in adults who have at least 4 monthly migraine days in Turkey. All patients filled out a survey on Google Form that comprised 54 questions, addressing various aspects such as demographics, migraine characteristics, previous use of acute symptomatic medication, failures with preventive drug classes, comorbidities, most bothersome symptoms, as well as the interictal burden of migraine.ResultsAmong the participants, 89.3% reported that galcanezumab treatment was beneficial for them. A decrease in the frequency (80.0%), severity (85.7%), and acute medication usage for migraine attacks (71.4%) was reported with galcanezumab treatment. An adverse effect related to galcanezumab was reported in 16.3% of cases, but no serious adverse reactions were observed. Remarkably, 14.3% of participants reported no longer experiencing any headaches, and 18.9% did not require any acute treatment while receiving galcanezumab treatment. A logistic regression model showed that male gender, lack of ictal nausea, and previous failure of more than 2 prophylactic agents may predict the non-responders.ConclusionsThe first large series from Turkey showed that galcanezumab treatment is safe and effective in most of the patients diagnosed with migraine by headache experts in the real-life setting. Patients reported a significant decrease in both ictal and interictal burden of migraine and expressed satisfaction with this treatment.

Conventional and unconventional treatments for migraine

Migraine is one of the leading causes of disability in humans. It causes significant deterioration in patients' lives and prevents daily functioning. Its main symptoms include photophobia, an enormous stabbing headache, nausea and vomiting. In addition, it can be accompanied by tinnitus, visual disturbances or dizziness. Before diagnosing migraine, serious intracranial pathology or other neurological conditions should be ruled out. Treatment of acute migraine is difficult due to significant rates of nonresponse to medications and the difficulty in predicting individual response to a particular agent or dose. A new class of drugs, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists, has been approved for the prevention of migraine in adults. In contrast, effective first-line therapies for mild to moderate migraine are over-the-counter nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and combination analgesics containing paracetamol, aspirin and caffeine.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) Monoclonal Antibodies in Preventing Migraines: A Systematic Review.

The neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is an essential pathophysiological treatment for migraines. A unique class of medications called CGRP monoclonal antibodies target CGRP and its receptor and have demonstrated promising benefits in the treatment and prevention of migraines. This study sought to identify and assess the quality of existing systematic reviews about the effectiveness of CGRP antibodies for preventing migraines, as well as systematically review and synthesize the evidence on these topics. This included the four Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and eptinezumab. The effectiveness and safety of these monoclonal antibodies in preventing migraines should also be examined in light of patient characteristics, and any gaps in the body of knowledge should be noted in order to suggest new lines of investigation. Data gathering included a thorough search of internet databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus) for relevant research released between 2018 and 2023. The findings imply that CGRP monoclonal antibodies are efficient and secure for preventing migraines and may be considered a first-line alternative for treating migraines and drug misuse. The results further imply that combination treatment with CGRP antibodies and onabotulinumtoxinA may enhance the prevention of migraine in adults. With suggestions for more studies to find and address these variables, the significance of genetic and epigenetic factors in the progression of pediatric patients' acute postoperative pain to chronic postsurgical pain is underlined. All four anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies, erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab, were shown to be safe and effective for the prevention of migraine when the research additionally looked at their individual effectiveness and safety. Additionally, the study discovered considerable variances in effectiveness amongst various groups. However, further investigation is required to establish the best time and dosage and the effect of patient characteristics on the effectiveness and safety of these medications.

Melatonin for migraine prevention in children and adolescents: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial after single-blind placebo lead-in.

Melatonin is effective for migraine prevention in adults. We hypothesized that melatonin would also be effective for migraine prevention in children and adolescents. This was a randomized, double-blind trial of melatonin (3 mg or 6 mg) versus placebo for migraine prevention in 10-17 year-olds with 4-28/28 headache days at baseline. Participants were recruited from the UCSF Child & Adolescent Headache Program, UCSF child neurology clinic, and social media advertisements. Migraine diagnosis was confirmed by a headache specialist. Participants completed an 8-week single-blind placebo run-in. Those meeting randomization criteria (≥4 headache days and ≥23/28 electronic diary entries during weeks 5-8) were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo:melatonin 3 mg:melatonin 6 mg nightly for 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was migraine days in weeks 5-8 of randomized treatment between melatonin (combined 6 mg + 3 mg) versus placebo. We aimed to enroll n = 210. The study closed early due to slow enrollment (n = 72). Two participants were in the single-blind phase when the study closed, therefore the meaningful n = 70. Sixteen percent (11/70) were lost to follow-up during the single-blind phase. An additional 21% (15/70) did not meet randomization criteria (<4 headache days: n = 5, <23/28 diary days: n = 7, both: n = 3). Sixty-three percent (44/70) were eligible to randomize, of whom 42 randomized (n = 14 per arm). Taking another preventive at enrollment (OR 8.3, 95% CI 1.01 to 68.9) was the only variable associated with meeting randomization criteria. Of those randomized, 91% (38/42) provided diary data in the final 4-weeks. However, given the amount of missing data, only those with ≥21/28 diary days were analyzed-7/14 (50%) in the placebo group, and 20/28 (71%) in the melatonin groups combined. Median (IQR) migraine/migrainous days in weeks 5-8 of double-blind treatment was 2 (1-7) in the placebo group versus 2 (1-12) in the melatonin groups combined; the difference in medians (95% CI for the difference) was 0 days (-9 to 3). There were no differences in adverse events between groups. When compared to recall at enrollment, headache days decreased across the single-blind placebo phase and the double-blind phase. There was no suggestion of superiority of melatonin; however, given the substantial portion of missing data, numerically higher in the placebo arm, and underpowering, this should not be interpreted as proof of inefficacy. Melatonin was generally well tolerated with no serious adverse events. Future migraine preventive trials in this age group may find this trial helpful for anticipating enrollment needs if using a single-blind placebo run-in. Enriching for those already on a migraine preventive may improve randomization rates in future trials, though would change the generalizability of results.

Comparison table: Some drugs for migraine prevention in adults.

Comparison Table: Some Drugs for Migraine Prevention in Adults

Early Clinical Experience With Eptinezumab From a Retrospective, Observational Study of Real-World Patient Response (P6-12.008)

<h3>Objective:</h3> To describe the patient response, including effects on disability and function, to eptinezumab in a real-world setting after 6 months of preventive migraine treatment. <h3>Background:</h3> The anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody eptinezumab is approved for the prevention of migraine in adults. Evidence from post-marketing studies is needed to better understand how eptinezumab prevents migraine in the real-world setting. <h3>Design/Methods:</h3> This retrospective chart review examined data from adults who initiated preventive treatment and received at least 2 infusions of eptinezumab (100mg or 300mg) at headache clinics between April and October 2020. Demographic information, treatment history, migraine and headache frequency, disease characteristics, and disability assessment scores (e.g., Migraine Disability Assessment [MIDAS], Headache Impact Test [HIT-6]) were collected using standardized case-report forms completed by physicians. These report forms measured patient and clinician perspectives on eptinezumab treatment response. <h3>Results:</h3> This analysis includes data from 31 patients with migraine (mean age, 50.7 years; 100% white [27/27]; 81.5% female [22/27]; 93.5% chronic migraine [29/31]) had been collected across 8 sites. Relative to baseline, 6 months of preventive treatment with eptinezumab reduced mean monthly headache days (23.5 at baseline, 16.3 at Month 6), mean monthly migraine days (17.9 at baseline, 9.1 at Month 6), and patient-reported disability (50.0% [11/22] severe at baseline per MIDAS and/or HIT-6, 36.8% [7/19] severe at Month 6). Eptinezumab treatment was also associated with reduced acute headache medication use (16.7 mean acute medication days per month in the last 3 months prior to treatment and 8.3 at Month 6). Clinicians reported that treatment was well-tolerated (96.8%) and improved disability/function (77.4%) after 6 months of use. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Early clinical experience with eptinezumab and the magnitude of improvement is consistent with results reported in controlled clinical trials, with reductions in headache frequency and associated disability evident during the first 6 months of treatment. <b>Disclosure:</b> Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Amgen. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Axsome Therapeutics. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Lundbeck. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving as a Consultant for Med-IQ. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Medscape. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Satsuma. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Neurolief. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Abbvie. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Everyday Health. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Allergan. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for WebMD. Steven Kymes has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Lundbeck. Steven Kymes has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for American Journal of Ophthalmology. Steven Kymes has received research support from Emmes Corporation. Divya Asher has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Lundbeck. Divya Asher has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of AbbVie. Seema Soni-Brahmbhatt has nothing to disclose. Meghana Karnik-Henry has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Lundbeck.

Investigating the Risk of Hypertension After Initiation of Erenumab in the Post-Market Setting (S47.009)

Investigating the Risk of Hypertension After Initiation of Erenumab in the Post-Market Setting (S47.009)

Effectiveness of Fremanezumab for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine: Second Interim Analysis of the Observational PEARL Study (P12-12.002)

Effectiveness of Fremanezumab for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine: Second Interim Analysis of the Observational PEARL Study (P12-12.002)

Lack of “wearing off” effect with eptinezumab in the preventive treatment of migraine (P13-12.009)

Lack of “wearing off” effect with eptinezumab in the preventive treatment of migraine (P13-12.009)

Eptinezumab (Vyepti)

&#x0D; CADTH reimbursement reviews are comprehensive assessments of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, as well as patient and clinician perspectives, of a drug or drug class.&#x0D; The assessments inform non-binding recommendations that help guide the reimbursement decisions of Canada's federal, provincial, and territorial governments, with the exception of Quebec.&#x0D; This review assesses eptinezumab (Vyepti), 100 mg/mL solution for IV infusion.&#x0D; Indication: Indicated for the prevention of migraine in adults who have had at least 4 migraine days per month.&#x0D;

Real-world experience of erenumab in patients with chronic or episodic migraine in the UAE

BackgroundErenumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody and a highly potent, first-in-class calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor inhibitor approved for migraine prevention in adults. Randomised, placebo-controlled trials show that erenumab treatment results in clinically meaningful responses, including significant reductions in monthly migraine days. Real-world evidence of the effectiveness of erenumab in patients with migraine is accruing, but gaps remain, and findings may vary according to region. We evaluated the usage patterns and effectiveness of erenumab in real-world settings in patients with migraine in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).MethodsThis retrospective, observational real-world study enrolled patients ≥ 18 years with migraine who were prescribed erenumab in the UAE. Data were collected at baseline and Months 1, 3 and 6. The primary study objective was to characterise usage patterns of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine (CM) or episodic migraine (EM) in real-world settings in the UAE.ResultsOf the 166 patients, 124 (74.7%) were females. The mean (standard deviation) age at migraine onset was 29 (7.93) years. Seventy-one patients (42.8%) had CM and 95 (57.2%) had EM.In the overall population, the mean monthly headache/migraine days (MHD) at baseline was 15.7 (8.45) and mean change from baseline was − 8.2 (8.83) at Month 1, − 11.0 (9.15) at Month 3 and − 11.3 (8.90) at Month 6. The mean change from baseline in monthly acute migraine-specific medication days (MSMD) was − 9.0 (8.07) at Month 1, − 9.7 (8.73) at Month 3 and − 10.7 (8.95) at Month 6. At all time points, most patients achieved at least 50% reduction in MHD (80%–91%) and MSMD (84%–94%).Similar reductions in MHD and MSMD and clinical benefit in CM or EM were seen with erenumab monotherapy or erenumab add-on therapy, with or without dose escalation and for treatment naïve or ≥ 1 previous preventive treatment failures, with additional clinical benefit in the erenumab add-on therapy and dose escalation to 140 mg subgroups.ConclusionIn this real-world study on erenumab use in the UAE, patients prescribed erenumab achieved clinically meaningful reductions in MHD and MSMD at all assessed time points. Erenumab was well tolerated with no new safety events.

Safety and efficacy of eptinezumab for migraine prevention in patients with two-to-four previous preventive treatment failures (DELIVER): a multi-arm, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial

The monoclonal antibody eptinezumab, which targets calcitonin gene-related peptide, has shown migraine preventive effects starting the day following infusion and acceptable safety and tolerability in phase 3 trials, but benefits in the subpopulations of patients with previous preventive treatment failures were not examined. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of eptinezumab for migraine prevention in adults with migraine and two-to-four previous preventive treatment failures. DELIVER was a multicentre, multi-arm, phase 3b trial comprising a 24-week double-blind, placebo-controlled period and a 48-week dose-blinded extension. We recruited adults with episodic or chronic migraine with at least 4 monthly migraine days (as per International Headache Society guidelines) and documented evidence of two-to-four previous preventive treatment failures within the past 10 years, from 96 study locations across Europe (n=93) and the USA (n=3). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) via a centralised randomisation system, stratified by baseline monthly headache days and country, to eptinezumab 100 mg, eptinezumab 300 mg, or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days (captured using a daily electronic diary) in weeks 1-12, assessed in the full analysis set. All participants and study personnel were masked to study drug assignments. The dose-blinded extension period is ongoing. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04418765, and EudraCT, 2019-004497-25. Between June 1, 2020, and Oct 7, 2021, 891 individuals were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of study drug (safety population; eptinezumab 100 mg n=299 [34%], eptinezumab 300 mg n=294 [33%], placebo n=298 [33%]). 865 patients completed the placebo-controlled period. The change from baseline to weeks 1-12 in mean monthly migraine days was -4·8 (SE 0·37) with eptinezumab 100 mg, -5·3 (0·37) with eptinezumab 300 mg, and -2·1 (0·38) with placebo. The difference from placebo in change in mean monthly migraine days from baseline was significant with eptinezumab 100 mg (-2·7 [95% CI -3·4 to -2·0]; p<0·0001) and eptinezumab 300 mg (-3·2 [-3·9 to -2·5]; p<0·0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 127 (42%) of 299 patients in the eptinezumab 100 mg group, in 120 (41%) of 294 in the eptinezumab 300 mg group, and in 119 (40%) of 298 in the placebo group. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was COVID-19 (20 [7%] of 299 patients in the eptinezumab 100 mg group, 17 [6%] of 294 in the eptinezumab 300 mg group, and 16 [5%] of 298 in the placebo group). Serious adverse events were uncommon (five [2%] of 299 in the eptinezumab 100 mg group, seven [2%] of 294 in the eptinezumab 300 mg group, four [1%] of 298 in the placebo group) and included anaphylactic reaction (eptinezumab 300 mg n=2) and COVID-19 (eptinezumab 100 mg n=1 and eptinezumab 300 mg n=1). In adults with migraine and two-to-four previous preventive treatment failures, eptinezumab provided significant migraine preventive effects compared with placebo, with acceptable safety and tolerability, indicating that eptinezumab might be an effective treatment option for this patient population. The dose-blinded extension period will provide additional long-term safety data in patients with migraine and previous preventive treatment failures. H Lundbeck.

A real-world study of acute and preventive medication use, adherence, and persistence in patients prescribed fremanezumab in the United States

BackgroundFollowing approval of fremanezumab for the prevention of migraine in adults, health care decision makers are interested in understanding real-world clinical characteristics and treatment patterns among patients initiating fremanezumab therapy.MethodsData were obtained for this retrospective (pre-post) study from the Veradigm Health Insights database. The study period was January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2019. Patients were included if they were aged ≥ 18 years; had ≥ 1 migraine diagnosis during the study period; and had a medication record for fremanezumab on or after diagnosis during the identification period (September 1, 2018–December 31, 2018). Treatment patterns, including adherence, persistence, and utilization of acute and preventive migraine medication prescriptions, were evaluated.ResultsOf 987 patients initiating fremanezumab during the study period, 738 (74.8%) were adherent to fremanezumab by proportion of days covered (PDC; ≥ 80%) and 780 (79.0%) were adherent by medication possession ratio (MPR; ≥ 80%). A total of 746 (75.6%) patients were persistent for ≥ 6 months. Quarterly fremanezumab (n = 186) was associated with higher rates of adherence versus monthly fremanezumab (n = 801) by PDC (quarterly, 91.3%; monthly, 84.9%; P < 0.001) and MPR (quarterly, 92.2%; monthly, 87.9%; P = 0.006) and higher persistence at ≥ 6 months (quarterly, 82.8%; monthly, 73.9%; P = 0.011). After fremanezumab initiation, patients who were persistent for ≥ 6 months experienced significant reductions from baseline in the mean monthly number of acute and preventive migraine medication prescriptions (P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses in patients with comorbid depression and anxiety showed meaningful real-world benefits based on significant reductions in the number of patients who were prescribed antidepressants (baseline, 68.6%; follow-up, 56.4%; P = 0.0025) and anxiolytic medications (baseline, 55.0%; follow-up, 47.2%; P = 0.037), respectively. In a subgroup of patients with comorbid hypertension at baseline, fremanezumab treatment resulted in nonsignificant reductions in blood pressure.ConclusionsOverall, adherence and persistence to fremanezumab in this real-world study was high in patients with migraine, with higher rates observed for quarterly fremanezumab. Patients who were persistent for ≥ 6 months experienced significant reductions in acute and preventive migraine medication use, while a subgroup of migraine patients with comorbid depression and anxiety at baseline showed significant reductions in antidepressant and anxiolytic medication use.

Galcanezumab (Emgality)

&#x0D; CADTH reimbursement reviews are comprehensive assessments of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, as well as patient and clinician perspectives, of a drug or drug class.&#x0D; The assessments inform non-binding recommendations that help guide the reimbursement decisions of Canada's federal, provincial, and territorial governments, with the exception of Quebec.&#x0D; This review assesses galcanezumab (Emgality), 120 mg/mL solution for subcutaneous injection.&#x0D; Indication: For the prevention of migraine in adults who have at least 4 migraine days per month.&#x0D;

The preventive effect of the combination of atorvastatin and nortriptyline in migraine-type headache: a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial

ABSTRACT Background and purpose Migraine ranked as the eighth cause of disability worldwide. Statins with anti-inflammatory and vasodilatory endothelial effects have been introduced as an option for the prevention of migraine-type headaches. The current study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of atorvastatin for the prevention of migraine in adults. Method This prospective, triple-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial was performed in adult migraineurs from mid-July 2019 to late-April 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to receive atorvastatin or placebo in combination with nortriptyline for 24-weeks. The frequency of headache was the primary outcome, and intensity of the headache and quality of life (QOL) were the secondary outcomes for this study. Results With 34 patients in each arm, 68 patients with migraines based on the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria were enrolled in the study. At week 24, patients in the atorvastatin group experienced significantly fewer migraine attacks than the placebo group (P-value = 0.004). Moreover, there were significant differences between the two groups in QOL at follow-up intervals of 14 (P-value = 0.001) and 24 (P-value < 0.001) weeks. However, no significant difference was observed in the intensity of headache was observed in both groups (P-value > 0.05). The most common adverse effects in intervention and control groups were constipation and insomnia, respectively. Conclusion In patients with migraine, prophylaxis with atorvastatin significantly improved the frequency of headache and QOL over 24 weeks compared with placebo with no effect on the intensity of headache. Statins seem to be a potential promising drug for prophylaxis of migraine headaches.

Real-world impact of fremanezumab on migraine symptoms and resource utilization in the United States

BackgroundFremanezumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2Δa) that selectively targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), is approved for migraine prevention in adults. Real-world data on the effectiveness of fremanezumab are limited. This retrospective, observational cohort study assessed patient-reported migraine symptoms, health care resource utilization (HCRU), and direct medical costs before and after fremanezumab treatment initiation.MethodsData were extracted from September 2018 through June 2020 from the Midwest component of EMRClaims+®, an integrated health services database containing > 20 million medical records from national commercial insurance claims, Medicare claims, and regional electronic medical records. Patients included in the cohort analysis were aged ≥ 18 years and were administered fremanezumab, with enrollment or treatment history for ≥ 6 months prior (pre-index) to initiating fremanezumab (index date) and ≥ 1 month after the index date (post-index), and without pregnancy or pregnancy-related encounters during the study period. Patient-reported headache frequency, migraine pain intensity (MPI), composite migraine symptoms, and HCRU were assessed pre-index and ≥ 1 month after fremanezumab initiation. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare means of migraine symptoms and outcomes and HCRU before and after fremanezumab initiation.ResultsOverall, 172 patients were eligible for analysis. Of patients who self-reported (n = 129), 83.7% reported improvement in headache frequency or symptoms after fremanezumab treatment. Specifically, headache frequency decreased by 63% after fremanezumab initiation: mean (standard deviation) headache frequency was 22.24 (9.29) days per month pre-index versus 8.24 (7.42) days per month post-index (P < 0.0001). Mean MPI also decreased by 18% after fremanezumab initiation: MPI was 5.47 (3.19) pre-index versus 4.51 (3.34) post-index (P = 0.014). Mean emergency room (ER) visits per month decreased from 0.72 to 0.54 (P = 0.003), and mean outpatient visits per month decreased from 1.04 to 0.81 (P < 0.001). Mean hospitalizations per month decreased, but the results did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.095). Hospitalization and ER costs decreased, while outpatient costs increased, from pre-index to post-index, but differences were not statistically significant (P ≥ 0.232).ConclusionsSignificant reductions in headache frequency, MPI, and HCRU were observed after fremanezumab initiation in patients with migraine in a US real-world setting.

Pooled analysis of safety and efficacy of fremanezumab in different racial and ethnic subgroups of patients with migraine

Fremanezumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2Δa) that selectively targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), has proven efficacy for migraine prevention in adults. These pooled analyses evaluated the safety and efficacy of fremanezumab in racial/ethnic subgroups.

Effects of Intravenous Eptinezumab vs Placebo on Headache Pain and Most Bothersome Symptom When Initiated During a Migraine Attack

Intravenous eptinezumab, an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide antibody, is approved for migraine prevention in adults. It has established onset of preventive efficacy on day 1 after infusion. To evaluate the efficacy of and adverse events related to eptinezumab when initiated during a migraine attack. Phase 3, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted from November 4, 2019, to July 8, 2020, at 47 sites in the United States and the country of Georgia. Participants (aged 18-75 years) with a greater than 1-year history of migraine and migraine on 4 to 15 days per month in the 3 months prior to screening were treated during a moderate to severe migraine attack. Eptinezumab, 100 mg (n = 238), or placebo (n = 242), administered intravenously within 1 to 6 hours of onset of a qualifying moderate to severe migraine. Co-primary efficacy end points were time to headache pain freedom and time to absence of most bothersome symptom (nausea, photophobia, or phonophobia). Key secondary end points were headache pain freedom and absence of most bothersome symptom at 2 hours after start of infusion. Additional secondary end points were headache pain freedom and absence of most bothersome symptom at 4 hours and use of rescue medication within 24 hours. Of 480 randomized and treated patients (mean age, 44 years; 84% female), 476 completed the study. Patients treated with eptinezumab vs placebo, respectively, achieved statistically significantly faster headache pain freedom (median, 4 hours vs 9 hours; hazard ratio, 1.54 [P < .001]) and absence of most bothersome symptom (median, 2 hours vs 3 hours; hazard ratio, 1.75 [P < .001]). At 2 hours after infusion, in the respective eptinezumab and placebo groups, headache pain freedom was achieved by 23.5% and 12.0% (between-group difference, 11.6% [95% CI, 4.78%-18.31%]; odds ratio, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.39-3.72]; P < .001) and absence of most bothersome symptom by 55.5% and 35.8% (between-group difference, 19.6% [95% CI, 10.87%-28.39%]; odds ratio, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.55-3.25]; P < .001). Results remained statistically significant at 4 hours after infusion. Statistically significantly fewer eptinezumab-treated patients used rescue medication within 24 hours than did placebo patients (31.5% vs 59.9%, respectively; between-group difference, -28.4% [95% CI, -36.95% to -19.86%]; odds ratio, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.21-0.45]; P < .001). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 10.9% of the eptinezumab group and 10.3% of the placebo group; the most common was hypersensitivity (eptinezumab, 2.1%; placebo, 0%). No treatment-emergent serious adverse events occurred. Among patients eligible for preventive migraine therapy experiencing a moderate to severe migraine attack, treatment with intravenous eptinezumab vs placebo shortened time to headache and symptom resolution. Feasibility of administering eptinezumab treatment during a migraine attack and comparison with alternative treatments remain to be established. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04152083.

PEARL study protocol: a real-world study of fremanezumab effectiveness in patients with chronic or episodic migraine.

Fremanezumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2Δa) that selectively targets calcitoningene-related peptide and isapproved in Europe for migraine prevention in adults with ≥4 migraine days/month. The Pan-European Real Life (PEARL) study is a 24-month, prospective, observational study of fremanezumab in chronicor episodic migraine. End points include proportion of patients with ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine daysduring 6months of treatment (primary); changes in monthly migraine days, disability scores and acute headache medication use; adherence and persistence; and effectiveness in patients switching from another calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway-targeting monoclonal antibody. PEARL is being conducted in approximately 100 centers in 11 European countries (estimated n =1100). PEARL will generate important real-world data on effectiveness of fremanezumab and treatment patterns in patients with chronic migraine or episodic migraine.