Prevention Of Infective Endocarditis Research Articles

Infective endocarditis: complications, clinical features in various population groups, treatment, prevention. Literary review

The literature review presents an analysis of domestic and foreign publications, modern clinical guidelines for infective endocarditis. Based on the analysis of literature data, the main directions of examination of patients with infective endocarditis, including complicated forms of the disease, were determined. Approaches to the treatment and prevention of infective endocarditis are analyzed. Modern aspects of surgical treatment of this pathology are considered.

Infective Endocarditis in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis: A Current Review

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Cardiovascular and infective complications are commonly observed in patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) with cardiovascular events and infection-related complications being the first and second leading causes of death. Infective endocarditis (IE) is characterized by inflammation of the endocardium caused by infection, typically affecting the cardiac valves and can be in acute, subacute, or chronic forms. It is a serious complication within the HD population due to their predisposition for both infection and valvular damage. Considering the frailty and burden of comorbidities in those receiving HD, management of IE in the HD population is very challenging. There has been continuous discussion and debate on optimizing the diagnostic and treatment approach of IE in this patient group to improve their clinical outcomes. Currently, reported outcomes are relatively poor and there are updates from numerous guidelines relating to advances in IE management. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> In this review, we will evaluate the evidence in relation to the epidemiology of HD-associated IE and discuss the important risk factors of IE in patients requiring dialysis. We will also evaluate the current recommendations regarding diagnosis and treatment for suspected or confirmed IE cases amongst HD patients and present the updated data regarding clinical outcomes relating to HD-associated IE. <b><i>Key Messages:</i></b> The incidence of IE in HD patients is expected to increase going forward as HD becomes more easily accessible alongside an emerging uptake of home HD. A more thorough insight into this topic is required to improve clinical practice relating to IE prevention and management in the HD population, given relatively poor clinical outcomes.

Prevention of infective endocarditis in at-risk patients: how should dentists proceed in 2024?

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines are ambiguous over the need for patients at increased risk of infective endocarditis (IE) to receive antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) prior to invasive dental procedures (IDPs), and this has caused confusion for patients and dentists alike. Moreover, the current law on consent requires clinicians to ensure that patients are made aware of any material risk they might be exposed to by any proposed dental treatment and what can be done to ameliorate this risk, so that the patient can decide for themselves how they wish to proceed. The aim of this article is to provide dentists with the latest information on the IE-risk posed by IDPs to different patient populations (the general population and those defined as being at moderate or high risk of IE), and data on the effectiveness of AP in reducing the IE risk in these populations. This provides the information dentists need to facilitate the informed consent discussions they are legally required to have with patients at increased risk of IE about the risks posed by IDPs and how this can be minimised. The article also provides practical information and advice for dentists on how to manage patients at increased IE risk who present for dental treatment.

Antibiotic-Prescribing Habits in Dentistry: A Questionnaire-Based Study.

A ten-question survey was administered to a group of Italian dentists. The participants were asked about their preferences for antibiotic administration for the prevention of infective endocarditis, the administration of antibiotics to patients allergic to penicillin, the insertion of implants, and the extraction of third molars. The retrieved data were screened and analyzed. A total of 298 surveys were filled out. The most-prescribed antibiotic was amoxicillin or amoxicillin with clavulanic acid or macrolides for allergic patients. The administration of two grams of amoxicillin one hour before surgery was the most widely used prescriptive protocol for prophylaxis. International guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis for infective endocarditis were only partially followed. The most heterogeneous results emerged for prophylaxis associated with dental implants or provided prior to surgical third-molar extraction. The present study shows widespread antibiotic prescriptive heterogeneity among the sample of dentists analyzed, especially in conditions where international guidelines are lacking. An evidence-based consensus on prescriptive modalities in dentistry would be desirable in the near future.

Infective Endocarditis Antibiotic Prophylaxis: Review of the Evidence and Guidelines.

The question of antibiotic prophylaxis and its role in prevention of infective endocarditis (IE) remains controversial, with differing recommendations from international societies. The aim of this review was to compare and contrast current recommendations on antibiotic prophylaxis for IE by the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and highlight the evidence supporting these recommendations. International guidelines for administration of antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of IE are largely unchanged since 2009. Studies on the impact of the more restrictive antibiotic prophylaxis recommendations are conflicting, with several studies suggesting lack of adherence to current guidance from the ESC (2015), NICE (2016), and AHA (2021). The question of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with IE remains controversial, with differing recommendations from international societies. Despite the change in guidelines more than 15years ago, lack of adherence to current guidelines persists. Due to the lack of high-quality evidence and the conflicting results from observational studies along with the lack of randomized clinical trials, the question of whether to recommend antibiotic prophylaxis or not in certain patient populations remains unanswered and remains largely based on expert consensus opinion.

Nondental Invasive Procedures and Risk of Infective Endocarditis: Time for a Revisit: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association.

There have been no published prospective randomized clinical trials that have: (1) established an association between invasive dental and nondental invasive procedures and risk of infective endocarditis; or (2) defined the efficacy and safety of antibiotic prophylaxis administered in the setting of invasive procedures in the prevention of infective endocarditis in high-risk patients. Moreover, previous observational studies that examined the association of nondental invasive procedures with the risk of infective endocarditis have been limited by inadequate sample size. They have typically focused on a few potential at-risk surgical and nonsurgical invasive procedures. However, recent investigations from Sweden and England that used nationwide databases and demonstrated an association between nondental invasive procedures, and the subsequent development of infective endocarditis (in particular, in high-risk patients with infective endocarditis) prompted the development of the current science advisory.

Aortic Valve Reinterventions after Ozaki: Clinical Case Series from Four Centers

Introduction. One of surgical methods for treatment of aortic valve (AV) pathology is Aortic Valve Neocuspidalization Ozaki procedure (AVNeo). Thus, according to the latest systematic review, freedom from reoperation within one, three, five years after AVNeo was 98%, 97% and 96%. Available references provide few descriptions of reoperations after AVNeo. Aim. To analyze the immediate results of AV reinterventions after AVNeo. Materials and methods. In the medium term, reinterventions after AVNeo were necessary for 11 patients (4.3%). The age of patients ranged from 26 to 69 years. 11 patients who underwent surgery included 6 males and 5 females. Four patients had class III-IV CHF, according to NYHA classification. Three patients had previously been operated on for infective endocarditis (IE), and five patients had bicuspid aortic valve. The duration of follow-up, from AVNeo surgery to reinterventions, ranged from 3 to 43 months. Results and discussion. All patients underwent an isolated AV intervention. The main causes of dysfunction were IE (six patients) and leaflet rupture in the commissural area (five patients). Seven patients underwent aortic valve replacement with mechanical valves, one patient — with aortic homograft valve, one patient — with tissue valve and two patients underwent valve repair. In the early postoperative period, one patient had bleeding with the development of cardiac tamponade and one patient had a haemorrhagic stroke. No patients had ARF, perioperative myocardial damage, sternal infection or permanent pacemaker implantation. Two patients died during the hospital period. Conclusions. AV reinterventions are associated with a high incidence of complications and deaths. Therefore, prevention of IE and commissure enhancement should reduce the frequency of repeated interventions, which is to be confirmed by prospective studies in large cohorts of patients.

Assessment of the current knowledge about infective endocarditis prevention among dental hygienists in Italy: A national survey.

To date, there is a lack of data regarding the acceptance of the guidelines for infective endocarditis (IE) prevention among dentists in Italy, and similarly, there are no data on the understanding and compliance of those among dental hygienists (DH). Thus, we tried to assess the ability of DH to recognize and manage categories of patients at high risk of EI, to identify which dental procedures are at increased risk and to assess the level of knowledge of doses and how antibiotic prophylaxis should be administered in specific cases. An anonymous questionnaire was prepared and made accessible online by sharing a Google Forms® link; general personal data and educational background information were collected to obtain a profile of the participants. A total of 362 DH answered to our web-based survey, showing a prevalent female percentage (86.7%) and the most represented age group of 30-39 years old (43.1%). Regarding the gender differences, there were not overall statistically significant differences; similarly, we did not find any differences regarding the overall number of wrong questions if considering the different ages of the participant and the year of graduation. Graduates in Northern Italy have mistaken fewer questions than graduates in other geographical areas. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest survey about the knowledge of IE for DH ever performed. Because the overprescription of antibiotics contributes to the development of drug resistance, antibiotic stewardship should be at the forefront of patient care. Our data reflect the need for placing a greater emphasis on IE prophylaxis education in training and during continuing professional development events for DH.

Antibiotics for Dental Implant Surgery: Extracting Available Evidence, Risks, Benefits, and Insights to Consider.

Antibiotics for Dental Implant Surgery: Extracting Available Evidence, Risks, Benefits, and Insights to Consider.

Platelet Activation and Aggregation Induced by Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus Complex.

Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex (SBSEC) is a common cause of infective endocarditis (IE). For IE-pathogens, the capacity to activate and aggregate platelets is believed to be an important virulence mechanism. While the interactions between bacteria and platelets have been described in detail for many Gram-positive pathogens, little research has been carried out with SBSEC in this respect. Twenty-six isolates of the four most common species and subspecies of SBSEC identified in bacteremia were collected, and interactions with platelets were investigated in platelet rich plasma (PRP) from three donors. Aggregation was studied using light-transmission aggregometry and platelet activation using flow cytometry detecting surface upregulation of CD62P. Platelets and serum were treated with different inhibitors to determine mechanisms involved in platelet aggregation and activation. Twenty-two of 26 isolates induced aggregation in at least one donor, and four isolates induced aggregation in all three donors. In PRP from donor 1, isolate SL1 induced a rapid aggregation with a median time of 70 s to reach 50% aggregation. Blockade of the platelet Fc-receptor or enzymatic cleavage of IgG abolished platelet activation and aggregation. The capacity for bacteria-induced platelet aggregation was also shown to be transferable between donors through serum. SBSEC mediates platelet aggregation in an IgG and IgG-Fc-receptor dependent manner. Bacterial activation of platelets through this pathway is common for many bacteria causing IE and could be a potential therapeutic target for the prevention and treatment of this infection. IMPORTANCE The capacity of bacteria to activate and aggregate platelets is believed to contribute to the pathogenesis of IE. The Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex (SBSEC) contains known IE-pathogens, but there is limited research on the different subspecies ability to interact with platelets and what signaling pathways are involved. This study reports that 22 of 26 tested isolates of different subspecies within SBSEC can induce aggregation, and that aggregation is host dependent. The Fc-IgG-receptor pathway was shown essential for platelet activation and aggregation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that reports on platelet interactions of SBSEC-isolates other than Streptococcus gallolyticus subspecies gallolyticus as well as the first study to report of mechanisms of platelet interaction of SBSEC-isolates. It adds SBSEC to a group of bacteria that activate and aggregate platelets via the platelet Fc-receptor. This could be a potential therapeutic target for prevention of IE.

Association of Intravenous Drug Use and Length of Stay Following Infective Endocarditis

IntroductionIntravenous drug use (IVDU) and associated infective endocarditis (IE) has been on the rise in the US since the beginning of the opioid epidemic. IVDU-IE has high morbidity and mortality, and treatment can be lengthy. We aim to quantify the association between IVDU and length of stay (LOS) in IE patients. MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample database was used to identify IE patients, which was then stratified into IVDU-IE and non-IVDU-IE groups. Weighted values of hospitalizations were used to generate national estimates. Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were applied to estimate the effects of IVDU on LOS. ResultsWe identified 1,114,257 adult IE patients, among which 123,409 (11.1%) were IVDU-IE. Compared to non-IVDU-IE patients, IVDU-IE patients were younger, had fewer comorbidities, and had an overall longer LOS (median [interquartile range]: 10 [5-20] versus 7 [4-13] d, P < 0.001), with a greater percentage of patients with a LOS longer than 30 d (13.7% versus 5.7%, P < 0.001). After adjusting for multiple demographic and clinical factors, IVDU was independently associated with a 1.25-d increase in LOS (beta-coefficient = 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-1.54, P < 0.001) and 35% higher odds of being hospitalized for more than 30 d (odds ratio = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.27-1.44, P < 0.001). ConclusionsAmong IE patients, being IVDU has associated with a longer LOS and a higher risk of prolonged hospital stay. Steps toward the prevention of IE in the IVDU population should be taken to avoid an undue burden on the healthcare system.

Management of Infective Endocarditis in People Who Inject Drugs: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

The American Heart Association has sponsored both guidelines and scientific statements that address the diagnosis, management, and prevention of infective endocarditis. As a result of the unprecedented and increasing incidence of infective endocarditis cases among people who inject drugs, the American Heart Association sponsored this original scientific statement. It provides a more in-depth focus on the management of infective endocarditis among this unique population than what has been provided in prior American Heart Association infective endocarditis-related documents. A writing group was named and consisted of recognized experts in the fields of infectious diseases, cardiology, addiction medicine, and cardiovascular surgery in October 2021. A literature search was conducted in Embase on November 19, 2021, and multiple terms were used, with 1345 English-language articles identified after removal of duplicates. Management of infective endocarditis in people who inject drugs is complex and requires a unique approach in all aspects of care. Clinicians must appreciate that it requires involvement of a variety of specialists and that consultation by addiction-trained clinicians is as important as that of more traditional members of the endocarditis team to improve infective endocarditis outcomes. Preventive measures are critical in people who inject drugs and are cured of an initial bout of infective endocarditis because they remain at extremely high risk for subsequent bouts of infective endocarditis, regardless of whether injection drug use is continued.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis Against Infective Endocarditis Before Invasive Dental Procedures

BackgroundAntibiotic prophylaxis (AP) before invasive dental procedures (IDPs) is recommended to prevent infective endocarditis (IE) in those at high IE risk, but there are sparse data supporting a link between IDPs and IE or AP efficacy in IE prevention. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate any association between IDPs and IE, and the effectiveness of AP in reducing this. MethodsWe performed a case-crossover analysis and cohort study of the association between IDPs and IE, and AP efficacy, in 7,951,972 U.S. subjects with employer-provided Commercial/Medicare-Supplemental coverage. ResultsTime course studies showed that IE was most likely to occur within 4 weeks of an IDP. For those at high IE risk, case-crossover analysis demonstrated a significant temporal association between IE and IDPs in the preceding 4 weeks (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.59-2.52; P = 0.002). This relationship was strongest for dental extractions (OR: 11.08; 95% CI: 7.34-16.74; P < 0.0001) and oral-surgical procedures (OR: 50.77; 95% CI: 20.79-123.98; P < 0.0001). AP was associated with a significant reduction in IE incidence following IDP (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.29-0.85; P = 0.01). The cohort study confirmed the associations between IE and extractions or oral surgical procedures in those at high IE risk and the effect of AP in reducing these associations (extractions: OR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.03-0.34; P < 0.0001; oral surgical procedures: OR: 0.09; 95% CI: 0.01-0.35; P = 0.002). ConclusionsWe demonstrated a significant temporal association between IDPs (particularly extractions and oral-surgical procedures) and subsequent IE in high–IE-risk individuals, and a significant association between AP use and reduced IE incidence following these procedures. These data support the American Heart Association, and other, recommendations that those at high IE risk should receive AP before IDP.

Risk of infective endocarditis associated with invasive dental procedures in patients with cardiac rhythm devices.

The incidence of infective endocarditis related to cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has gradually increased. The risk associated with dental procedures in patients with CIED implantation and the need for prevention of infective endocarditis remain unclear. The present study investigated the incidence and risk of infective endocarditis associated with invasive dental procedures in patients with CIEDs. We analysed a nationwide population-based cohort of patients with CIEDs who underwent dental procedures. We performed a self-controlled case series analysis and evaluated the incidence rate ratio of infective endocarditis 3 months after dental procedures. Of a total of 62 019 patients who underwent CIED implantation, 32 536 patients underwent at least one dental procedure during follow-up, and the mean number of dental procedures was 3.4 per patient. They were 152 infections with an incidence of 445 per 100 000 person-years in the dental procedure period and 500 events at an incidence of 255 per 100 000 person-years in the non-dental procedure period. The CIED-related infective endocarditis in the dental procedure period occurred significantly more frequently than during non-dental procedure periods (odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-2.05; P < 0.001). The mean time interval from dental procedure to infective endocarditis was 59.6 ± 47.3 days. Invasive dental procedures are associated with an increased risk of infective endocarditis in those who underwent CIED implantation. Appropriate preventive therapy might be needed in these patients.

Ticagrelor prevents infective endocarditis by mitigating Staphylococcus aureus virulence

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a deadly disease mainly caused by the gram-positive and highly virulent bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (SA). Due to lack of efficacy of current antibiotic therapy, there is an urgent need to discover new strategies that could prevent this disease. To assess the ability of the antiplatelet drug ticagrelor, which also displays antibacterial activity against gram-positive bacteria, to prevent SAIE. We used a mouse model of infective endocarditis induced by a SAIE clinical isolate. Ticagrelor was administered orally at a conventional dosage (3 mg/kg, single dose) prior to infection and local histamine infusion on the aortic valve. Infected vegetation presence was determined by Gram staining on heart sections after three days. Antibacterial effect of ticagrelor at dosages equivalent to plasma levels achieved in patients (0.75–1.25 μg/mL) was assessed in vitro in human blood. Ticagrelor significantly prevented the formation of infected vegetation, with IE in only 14.3% of ticagrelor-treated mice ( n = 21) compared to 52.3% of vehicle-treated mice ( n = 37). Ex vivo ADP-induced platelet aggregation assays confirmed rapid reversibility of antiplatelet activity (4 hours), which made it unlikely that solely the antiplatelet effect would explain IE prevention by ticagrelor. Bacterial survival in blood was not diminished three days post-infection. We therefore assessed whether ticagrelor could affect bacterial virulence. We found that growing SA in the presence of 1.25 μg/mL ticagrelor inhibited a-toxin RNA expression and protein secretion, which was corroborated with drastically reduced hemolysis and platelet aggregation induced by bacterial supernatants. Ticagrelor-treated bacteria could no longer adhered to fibrinogen, and in whole blood perfusion experiments, flow-dependent bacterial adhesion on activated endothelial cells was severely impaired. Our study demonstrates the unprecedented ability of ticagrelor to prevent IE by a novel mechanism of directly mitigating bacterial virulence. Hence, clinical trials using ticagrelor as adjunct therapy to antibiotics in patients at risk for IE are warranted.

Prevention of Infective Endocarditis of Oral Origin in Children: A Call for Pediatric Dentists–Pediatric Cardiologists’ Collaboration in Egypt

To assess knowledge and practices of some Egyptian pediatric dentists and pediatric cardiologists/cardiac surgeons regarding prevention of infective endocarditis (IE) from oral origin in children. Pediatric dentists or pediatric cardiologists/cardiac surgeons having their practice in Egypt were conveniently selected. An online questionnaire was constructed for each specialty practitioner in English using a web-based platform. Each survey tool collected data about demographics, knowledge, and practices concerning the prevention of IE of oral origin. Surveys were disseminated to potential respondents using direct messaging or posting surveys' links on high-traffic areas (blogs, groups, or pages) of commonly known social media platforms. Two-hundred and thirty-nine pediatric dentists and 71 pediatric cardiologists/cardiac surgeons' responses were included in analysis. Some shortage in oral health knowledge and deviations in management protocol from known guidelines were evident in cardiologists' responses, whereas 66.2 and 64.8% reported encountering IE of oral origin or canceling a cardiac surgery due to oral infection, respectively. Most pediatric dentists (65.7%) rely on physician referral before managing children at risk of IE despite following recognized guidelines for IE prevention which may reflect difficulty in understanding such guidelines. Ninety percent of children with heart diseases visit a dentist due to oral complaint and not for checkup. Identification of disparities and pitfalls in management of children with heart diseases, if appropriately addressed by pediatric dentists and cardiologists, may reduce the risk of IE from an oral origin. Health education of both specialists and development of national guidelines based on national epidemiology and clinical experience of cardiologists are strongly needed to decrease oral disease burden, allow for a consensus of patient management, and minimize the need for cross-referral, thus facilitating dental management without undue delays.

A Bug in the System—Is Limiting the Use of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Prevention of Infective Endocarditis Really a Good Idea?

In 2009, the European Society of Cardiology made updates to recommendations regarding antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of infective endocarditis (IE), effectively limiting indications for prophylaxis to only the highest risk patients undergoing dental procedures with expected manipulation of the gingiva or periapical regions of the teeth.1 Specifically, high-risk patients were defined as those with prosthetic valves or prosthetic materials in the heart, patients with previous IE, and patients with congenital heart disease.

Factors that affect dentists’ use of antibiotic prophylaxis: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network questionnaire

BackgroundLittle is known about factors that influence dentists’ decision making concerning antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) prescribing. The objective of this study was to determine factors that influence dentists’ AP prescribing habits in patients at risk of developing infective endocarditis and prosthetic joint infections. MethodsA questionnaire was administered to 3,584 dentist members of The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. In addition to descriptive statistics, ordinal regression models were used to determine the factors most likely to impact dentists’ decisions to prescribe AP. ResultsOverall, 2,169 (61%) dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Resesarch Network responded. Responders’ decisions to prescribe antibiotics were influenced primarily by official guidelines, scientific literature, and physician or medical specialist opinion. Regarding potential risks, the greatest level of concern was for the development of infective endocarditis or prosthetic joint infections. Although litigation was deemed problematic, more than 90% of responders indicated a strong concern for the best course of action for the patient’s health. Dentists also indicated a high level of concern about the potential for generating antibiotic-resistant bacteria with AP use and increased risk of adverse drug reactions. ConclusionsDentists’ AP decision making seems most influenced by official guidelines, scientific literature, and advice from a physician or medical specialist. Practical ImplicationsThese results suggest that one of the most effective means for promoting concordance of dentists clinical practice with the scientific basis for AP is to emphasize the importance and clarity of American Heart Association and American Dental Association recommendations and antimicrobial stewardship regarding prevention of infective endocarditis and prosthetic joint infections.

Infective Endocarditis Among High-risk Individuals Before and After the Cessation of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Dentistry: A National Cohort Study.

BackgroundA few years after the publication of the British guidelines, national recommendations were published by the Swedish Medical Products Agency in October 2012, promoting the cessation of antibiotic prophylaxis in dentistry for the prevention of infective endocarditis (IE). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the incidence of oral streptococcal IE increased among high-risk individuals after October 2012.MethodsThis nationwide cohort study included all adult individuals (>17 years) living in Sweden from January 2008 to January 2018, with a diagnose code or surgical procedure code indicating high risk of IE. Cox proportional hazard models were performed to calculate adjusted ratios of oral streptococcal IE before and after October 2012 between high-risk individuals and references.ResultsThis study found no increased incidence of oral streptococcal IE among high-risk individuals during the 5 years after the cessation, compared with before. Hazard rate ratios were 15.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.3–28.5) before and 20.7 (95% CI: 10.0–42.7) after October 2012 for prevalent high-risk individuals. Corresponding ratios for incident high-risk individuals were 66.8 (95% CI: 28.7–155.6) and 44.6 (95% CI: 22.9–86.9). Point estimates for interaction with time period were 1.4 (95% CI: .6–3.5) and 0.8 (95% CI: .5–1.3) for prevalent and incident high-risk individuals, respectively.ConclusionThe results suggest that the current Swedish recommendation not to administer antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of IE in dentistry has not led to an increased incidence of oral streptococcal IE among high-risk individuals.

Dentists' knowledge and practices about infective endocarditis antibiotics prophylaxis among children in aseer region, Southwestern Saudi Arabia.

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a disease endangering human lives. Therefore, several prophylactic measures are required to improve the protection of endocarditis-prone patients from bacteremia resulting from various dental actions. These measures range from developing the dental hygiene to trials of different antimicrobial agents. To examine the knowledge and practices of dentists in Aseer Region, Saudi Arabia, regarding antibiotic prophylaxis against IE. Cross-sectional study. Aseer Region, Saudi Arabia. The participants were interviewed at their workplaces and the data collection sheet was constructed based on the guidelines of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC, 2017). The examination of the data gathered was calculated using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 25) such as to test the significance of variation in dentists' mean knowledge scores as per their personal characteristics. An output with P values <0.05 was statistically significant. 182 Dentists. Dentists' mean knowledge score was 17.5 ± 3.7 (out of 24). The least correct responses regarding dental procedures that require prophylactic antibiotics were "root canal treatment" (30.8%). Regarding cardiac conditions that require prophylactic antibiotics, dentists' least correct responses were "heart failure" (50%). Dentists' mean knowledge scores differed significantly according to their age groups (P = 0.032), nationality (P = 0.002), education/qualification (P = 0.002). Mean knowledge scores differed significantly according to dentists' years of experience (P = 0.018) and sources of information (P < 0.001). Amoxicillin was the most regularly recommended antibiotic (90.7%), while 86.8% correctly stated 30--60 min. before the procedure as the time for prophylactic antibiotic administration. The knowledge of dentists in Aseer Region regarding the use of preventive drugs for the control and prevention of IE is suboptimal. The inclusion of the latest AHA guidelines into the dentistry curricula is highly recommended. Outcome are simultaneously assessed.