Prevention Of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Research Articles

Lipoprotein Metabolism, Dyslipidemia, and Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Women: A Comprehensive Review.

Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is a cornerstone of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention. Although LLT might lead to different reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in women and men, LLT diminishes cardiovascular risk equally effectively in both sexes. Despite similar LLT efficacy, the use of high-intensity statins, ezetimibe, and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors is lower in women compared to men. Women achieve the guideline-recommended LDL-C levels less often than men. Greater cholesterol burden is particularly prominent in women with familial hypercholesterolemia. In clinical practice, women and men with dyslipidemia present with different cardiovascular risk profiles and disease manifestations. The concentrations of LDL-C, lipoprotein(a), and other blood lipids differ between women and men over a lifetime. Dissimilar levels of LLT target molecules partially result from sex-specific hormonal and genetic determinants of lipoprotein metabolism. Hence, to evaluate a potential need for sex-specific LLT, this comprehensive review (i) describes the impact of sex on lipoprotein metabolism and lipid profile, (ii) highlights sex differences in cardiovascular risk among patients with dyslipidemia, (iii) presents recent, up-to-date clinical trial and real-world data on LLT efficacy and safety in women, and (iv) discusses the diverse medical needs of women and men with dyslipidemia and increased cardiovascular risk.

The LDL cumulative exposure hypothesis: evidence and practical applications.

The trapping of LDL and other apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins within the artery wall causes atherosclerosis. As more LDL becomes trapped within the artery wall over time, the atherosclerotic plaque burden gradually increases, raising the risk of an acute cardiovascular event. Therefore, the biological effect of LDL on the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) depends on both the magnitude and duration of exposure. Maintaining low levels of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) over time decreases the number of LDL particles trapped within the artery wall, slows the progression of atherosclerosis and, by delaying the age at which mature atherosclerotic plaques develop, substantially reduces the lifetime risk of ASCVD events. Summing LDL-C measurements over time to calculate cumulative exposure to LDL generates a unique biomarker that captures both the magnitude and duration of exposure, which facilitates the estimation of the absolute risk of having an acute cardiovascular event at any point in time. Titrating LDL-C lowering to keep cumulative exposure to LDL below the threshold at which acute cardiovascular events occur can effectively prevent ASCVD. In this Review, we provide the first comprehensive overview of how the LDL cumulative exposure hypothesis can guide the prevention of ASCVD. We also discuss the benefits of maintaining lower LDL-C levels over time and how this knowledge can be used to inform clinical practice guidelines as well as to design novel primary prevention trials and ASCVD prevention programmes.

Coexistence of Standard Modifiable, Other Classical, and Novel and Classical Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Middle Eastern Young Women.

The coexistence of multiple standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs),classical and novel risk factors (RFs) for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is common in the Middle East (ME). There is a paucity of data on the coexistence of these RFs in ME young women. Comparing the prevalence and the statistical patterns of the SMuRFs, classical and novel RFs in target population. In this case-control (1:2) study, consecutive young women aged 18-50 years were enrolled in 12 centers (July 2021 to October 2023). Prevalence and coexistence of 19 RFs were compared between cases with ASCVD and their controls. The RFs included SMuRFs (hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and cigarette smoking), other classical RF (obesity, family history of premature ASCVD, and physical inactivity), novel RFs and social determinants of health (health insurance, place of residence, depression, and level of education). The study included 627 subjects; 209 had ASCVD (median age 46 years, IQR 49-42 years) and 418 controls (median age 45 years, IQR 48-41 years). The presence of 1-2 RFs; (ASCVD: 63.2%, Control: 54.1%, p=0.037) and 3-4 RFs; (ASCVD: 27.8%, Control: 3.3%, p < 0.001) SMuRFs was more prevalent in women with ASCVD. Similarly, the presence of 4-5 RFs; (ASCVD: 40.7%, Control: 14.6%, p<0.001), and 6-7 (ASCVD: 10.5%, Control: 1%, p < 0.001). The classical RF were also significantly common in these women. The distribution of multiple novel RF was not statistically significant across both groups. Finally, regarding the socioeconomic RFs in women with ASCVDs, the presence of 1-2 RFs (ASCVD: 59.8%, Control: 76.1%, p < 0.001) was significantly less common while the presence of 3-4 RFs (ASCVD: 39.2%, Control: 21.8%, p < 0.001) was vastly more common. An elevated rate of coexistence of classical RF in the case group, mainly socioeconomic and SMuRFs. By managing them primary and secondary ASCVDs prevention attained.

Prescription patterns of statins in cirrhotic patients: a survey among primary care physicians and cardiologists

Background Statin therapy is widely utilized for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, both as a primary and secondary measure. Despite the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases’ endorsement of statin use in cirrhotic patients, practitioners exhibit hesitancy, primarily due to concerns regarding hepatotoxicity. This study aimed to evaluate statin prescription patterns in cirrhotic patients by primary care physicians (PCPs) and cardiologists through a survey. Methods A voluntary survey via Survey Monkey with nine objective-type questions was sent to 220 PCPs and 75 cardiologists within Allegheny Health Network. Survey results were collected, and a chi square test was used to compare the two groups. A P value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 64 PCPs (29.1%) and 15 cardiologists (20%) completed the survey. Overall, 12.6% did not prescribe statins for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in compensated cirrhotic patients. While all cardiologists prescribed statins for secondary prevention, over 50% preferred lower-intensity options. Conversely, 14.1% of PCPs avoided statin prescriptions for secondary prevention. Cardiologists were significantly more inclined to prescribe statins, especially for cirrhosis due to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease compared to PCPs (73.3% vs 45.3%, P = 0.05). Conclusions Despite increasing evidence favoring use of statins in cirrhosis for improving portal hemodynamics and decreasing ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma, and mortality, there is still hesitation on the part of prescribers for the fear of worsening liver disease. Wider dissemination of current guidelines and education practices may help to bridge this gap.

Association of triglyceride-glucose index and its related parameters with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: evidence from a 15-year follow-up of Kailuan cohort

BackgroundTriglyceride glucose (TyG) index and its related parameters have been introduced as cost-effective surrogate indicators of insulin resistance, while prospective evidence of their effects on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remained scattered and inconsistent. We aimed to evaluate the association of TyG and its related parameters with new-onset ASCVD, and the predictive capacity were further compared.MethodA total of 95,342 ASCVD-free participants were enrolled from the Kailuan study. TyG and its related parameters were defined by fasting blood glucose, triglyceride, body mass index (BMI), waist circumstance (WC) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). The primary outcome was incident ASCVD, comprising myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic stroke (IS). Cox proportional hazard models and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were adopted to investigate the association between each index and ASCVD. The C-index, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were used for comparison of their predictive value for ASCVD.ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 15.0 years, 8,031 new cases of ASCVD were identified. The incidence rate of ASCVD increased along with elevated levels of each index, and the relationships were found to be nonlinear in the RCS analyses. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for ASCVD was 1.39 (1.35, 1.43), 1.46 (1.41, 1.50), 1.50 (1.46, 1.55), and 1.52 (1.48, 1.57) per 1 IQR increase of baseline TyG, TyG-BMI, TyG-WC, and TyG-WHtR, respectively, and the association were more pronounced for females and younger individuals aged < 60 years (Pfor interaction<0.05). Using the updated mean or time-varying measurements instead of baseline indicators did not significantly alter the primary findings. Additionally, TyG-WC and TyG-WHtR showed better performance in predicting risk of ASCVD than TyG, with the IDI (95% CI) of 0.004 (0.001, 0.004) and 0.004 (0.001, 0.004) and the category-free NRI (95% CI) of 0.120 (0.025, 0.138) and 0.143 (0.032, 0.166), respectively. Similar findings were observed for MI and IS.ConclusionsBoth the TyG index and its related parameters were significantly and positively associated with ASCVD. TyG-WC and TyG-WHtR had better performance in predicting incident ASCVD than TyG, which might be more suitable indices for risk stratification and enhance the primary prevention of ASCVD.

Paraoxonase 1: evolution of the enzyme and of its role in protecting against atherosclerosis.

To review the discoveries which led to the concept that serum paraoxonase 1 (PON1) is inversely related to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) incidence, how this association came to be regarded as causal and how such a role might have evolved. Animal models suggest a causal link between PON1 present on HDL and atherosclerosis. Serum PON1 activity predicts ASCVD with a similar reliability to HDL cholesterol, but at the extremes of high and low HDL cholesterol, there is discordance with PON1 being potentially more accurate. The paraoxonase gene family has its origins in the earliest life forms. Its greatest hydrolytic activity is towards lactones and organophosphates, both of which can be generated in the natural environment. It is active towards a wide range of substrates and thus its conservation may have resulted from improved survival of species facing a variety of evolutionary challenges. Protection against ASCVD is likely to be the consequence of some promiscuous activity of PON1, but nonetheless has the potential for exploitation to improve risk prediction and prevention of ASCVD.

Cardiovascular Risk in Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Challenges and Future Directions.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of non-cancer related mortality and morbidity among people living with or cured from cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are systemic anti-cancer therapies that have revolutionised the treatment of numerous cancers, even achieving durable long-term responses among patients with metastatic disease. However, the pro-inflammatory effects of ICIs have been postulated to increase the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in cancer survivorship. Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors can further contribute to ASCVD risk during cancer survivorship but are not routinely screened and are often untreated in patients with cancer. With the expanding use of ICIs leading to improved cancer survivorship, cardiovascular risk identification and prevention will be paramount in the care of patients with cancer. This review highlights the practical challenges associated with ASCVD prevention among the growing number of patients treated with ICIs for cancer, including balancing competing mortality risks from cancer and ASCVD, the lack of ICI-specific cardiovascular risk stratification tools, potential interactions between cardiovascular and oncological therapies, and barriers to implementation of cardiovascular screening and prevention within existing healthcare systems.

Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Primary and Secondary Prevention in Latino Subgroups.

Studies assessing equity in the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) for Latinos living in the USA collectively yield mixed results. Latino persons are diverse in many ways that may influence cardiovascular health. The intersection of Latino nativity and ASCVD prevention is understudied. To determine whether disparities in ASCVD screening, detection, and prescribing differ for US Latinos by country of birth. A retrospective cohort design utilizing 2014-2020 electronic health record data from a network of 320 community health centers across 12 states. Analyses occurred October 1, 2022, to September 30, 2023. Non-Hispanic White and Latino adults age 20-75years, born in Cuba, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, and the USA. Ethnicity and country of birth. Outcome measures included prevalence of statin eligibility, of having insufficient data to establish eligibility, odds of having a documented statin prescription, and rates of statin prescriptions and refills. We used covariate-adjusted logistic and generalized estimating equations logistic and negative binomial regressions to generate absolute and relative measures. Among 108,672 adults, 23% (n = 25,422) were statin eligible for primary or secondary prevention of ASCVD using American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. Latinos, born in and outside the USA were more likely eligible than Non-Hispanic White patients were (US-born Latino OR = 1.55 (95% CI = 1.37-1.75); non-US-born Latino OR = 1.63 (95% CI = 1.34-1.98)). The eligibility criteria that was met differed by ethnicity and nativity. Latinos overall were less likely missing data to establish eligibility and differences were again observed by specific non-US country of origin. Among those eligible, we observed no statistical difference in statin prescribing between US-born Latinos and non-Hispanic White persons; however, disparities varied by specific non-US country of origin. Efforts to improve Latino health in the USA will require approaches for preventing and reversing cardiovascular risk factors, and statin initiation that are Latino subgroup specific.

Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

During the past 30 years, several developments have occurred in the antiplatelet field, including the role of aspirin in primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. There have been several attempts to develop antiplatelet drugs more effective and safer than aspirin and a shift in emphasis from efficacy to safety, advocating aspirin-free antiplatelet regimens after percutaneous coronary intervention. Evidence supporting a chemopreventive effect of low-dose aspirin against colorectal (and other digestive tract) cancer has also strengthened. The aim of this article is to revisit the role of aspirin in the prevention of atherothrombosis across the cardiovascular risk continuum, in view of developments in the antiplatelet field. The review will offer a clinical perspective on aspirin's mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. This will be followed by a detailed discussion of its clinical efficacy and safety.

Breaking down statin myopathy: understanding the self-limited and autoimmune subtypes.

Statins are widely used crucial drugs for the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Although generally well tolerated, statin intolerance can unfortunately limit statin use, with statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) being the most common side effect associated with its discontinuation. Statin intolerance is an inability to tolerate a dose of statin required to sufficiently reduce an individual's cardiovascular risk, limiting the effective treatment of patients at risk of or with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Statin myopathy is a broad entity encompassing self-limited/toxic and autoimmune aetiologies. As statins are a mainstay of therapy in those with or at risk for CVD and offer a mortality benefit, it is critical to determine whether one's symptoms are truly statin-associated before discontinuing the drug. This review article aims to provide an update on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, evaluation and management of statin myopathy and to elucidate key differences between autoimmune and self-limited types.

LDL-C target attainment in the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in Albania: barriers and strategies to reach the goals

LDL-C target attainment in the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in Albania: barriers and strategies to reach the goals

Implementation of a Pharmacist-Driven Aspirin Deprescribing Protocol Among Older Veterans in a Primary Care Setting.

Background Recent cardiovascular guideline updates recommend against the use of aspirin for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in older people. However, aspirin use remains common in this population. Objective To implement and evaluate the benefit of a pharmacist-driven aspirin deprescribing protocol compared with primary care provider (PCP) education-only in a primary care setting. Methods This prospective, cohort project targeted deprescribing for patients prescribed aspirin for primary prevention of ASCVD. Patients were included if they received primary care services at the Milwaukee Veterans Health Administration Medical Center (VHA) and were 70 years of age or older. Criteria for exclusion were aspirin obtained outside the VHA system, aspirin prescribed for a non-ASCVD-related condition, and/or a history of ASCVD. Active deprescribing by pharmacists and PCP education took place in the intervention group with PCP education only in the standard-of-care group. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had aspirin deprescribed in each group. Secondary outcomes included patient acceptability of the intervention and barriers to implementation. Results A total of 520 patients were prescribed aspirin in the intervention group versus 417 in the education-only group. Sixty-five patients met intervention criteria and were contacted for aspirin deprescribing. The pharmacist-led active deprescribing group led to a higher rate of aspirin deprescriptions versus the education-only group (54% vs 18%; P = 0.0001) for patients who met criteria. Conclusion A pharmacist-led aspirin deprescribing protocol within a primary care setting significantly decreased the number of aspirin prescriptions compared with PCP education only.

Evaluation of Aspirin Prescribing and Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Adults 60 Years of Age and Older in a Large, Academic Health System.

Background National guidelines no longer recommend adults 60 years of age and older to begin treatment with low-dose daily aspirin for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to a lack of proven net benefit and a higher risk of bleeding. Objective The objective of this cross-sectional retrospective analysis was to evaluate the appropriateness of low-dose aspirin prescribing and subsequent gastrointestinal bleeding in older persons receiving primary care in a large academic health system. Setting Large, academic health system within Colorado. Patients Patients with an active order for daily low-dose aspirin as of July 1, 2021, were assessed for appropriateness based on indication (primary vs secondary prevention) and use of a concomitant proton-pump inhibitor (PPI). Incident gastrointestinal bleeds (GIBs) in the subsequent 12 months and GIB risk factors were also evaluated. Results A total of 19,525 patients were included in the analysis. Eighty-nine percent of patients identified as White and 54% identified as male. Of the total cohort, 44% had CVD and 19% were co-prescribed a PPI. GIB occurred in 247 patients (1.27%) within the subsequent year. Risk factors significantly associated with a GIB within 1 year included: history of GIB, history of peptic ulcer disease, other esophageal issue (esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, Mallory Weiss tears, etc.), 75 years of age or older, and history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Conclusion This evaluation found that many older persons at this institution may be inappropriately prescribed aspirin, providing opportunities for pharmacists to improve medication safety by deprescribing aspirin among primary prevention patients or potentially co-prescribing a PPI in secondary prevention patients.

Pharmacist-Led Deprescribing of Aspirin in Older People in an Outpatient Setting.

Background In 2019, the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association updated their joint guidelines stating low-dose aspirin should not be used on a routine basis for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) among people older than 70 years of age because of increased bleeding risk.1 In addition to these updated guidelines, a statement released by the US Preventive Services Task Force in April 2022 recommends against the initiation of low-dose aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in people 60 years of age or older.² Despite these updated recommendations, aspirin continues to be a common medication older patients take, providing an opportunity for a clinical pharmacist deprescribing intervention. Objective To identify the role of a pharmacist-led aspirin deprescribing intervention within a safety-net health system in the outpatient setting. Methods This project included patients 70 years of age and older who had aspirin listed as an active medication without documented ASCVD. This project assessed aspirin deprescribing rates, time spent on pharmacist outreach, and reasons for patient and/or provider refusal to discontinue aspirin. Results One hundred thirty-one eligible patients were contacted. Of those, 78 (60%) patients discontinued aspirin after speaking with the pharmacist, and 8 patients discontinued aspirin after a clinical pharmacist recommendation to the patient's primary care provider (PCP). The median time spent on outreach was approximately eight minutes. Of the 6 patients who consented to the project but declined to discontinue aspirin therapy based on pharmacist intervention, 5 preferred to discuss the issue with their PCP, while 1 patient was told by an outside provider to take aspirin. Conclusion Results indicate the successful impact a clinical pharmacist may have in deprescribing aspirin in a high-risk population. These data may also suggest that an active and intentional approach to deprescribing is likely to be more effective than a written recommendation to providers.

Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer in Veterans undergoing lung cancer screening who were not prescribed statins despite U.S. Preventative Services Task Force recommendations.

e20583 Background: It is well established that Veterans eligible for lung cancer screening (LCS) are also at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) due to smoking. Current concepts suggest that statins could play a role in lung cancer prevention and treatment. Accordingly, the purpose of this retrospective, quality improvement project was to determine whether newly diagnosed stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NCSLC) rate is higher in Veterans undergoing LCS who were not prescribed statins despite U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations. Methods: Electronic health records of Veterans undergoing LCS and subsequently diagnosed with NSCLC at the Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois between 2021 and 2023 were reviewed. In each case, pertinent demographic, clinical, pathological, and pharmacy data were retrieved. The American College of Cardiology’s ASCVD Risk Estimator was used to assess the Veteran’s 10-year risk for a first ASCVD event. Data are presented as means ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t- and chi-squared tests as indicated. P &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 57 Veterans diagnosed NSCLC, 33 (all males; 71±6 years; 28 African Americans) were prescribed and 24 (21 males, 3 females; 70±7 years; 18 African Americans) were not prescribed statins. Body mass index was similar in both groups (26.6±6.0 and 26.0±6.0 kg/m2, respectively; p = 0.73). Twenty one out of 24 Veterans (88%) not prescribed statins were eligible according to USPSTF recommendations (10-year calculated risk, 15.23%±6.9%). Stage IV NSCLC was diagnosed in 7/33 (21%) Veterans prescribed statins and in 10/21 (48%) USPSTF-eligible Veterans not prescribed statins (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: Clinicians should assess the needfor a statin for primary prevention of ASCVD in each Veteran undergoing LCS. Stage IV NSCLC is more prevalent in Veterans with ASCVD risk who were not prescribed statins despite USPSTF recommendations. A larger, multi-site study is warranted to support or refute these initial observations.

Inclisiran: the preclinical discovery and development of a novel therapy for the treatment of atherosclerosis

ABSTRACT Introduction Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. Lipid lowering therapy (LLT) constitutes the cornerstone of ASCVD prevention and treatment. However, several patients fail to achieve therapeutic goals due to low treatment adherence or limitations of standard-of-care (SoC) LLTs. Inclisiran represents a pivotal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering agent aiming to address current unmet needs in LLT. It is the first available small interfering RNA (siRNA) LLT, specifically targeting PCSK9 mRNA and leading to post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) of the PCSK9 gene. Areas covered Promising phase III trials revealed an ~ 50% reduction in LDL-C levels with subcutaneous inclisiran administration on days 1 and 90, followed by semiannual booster shots. Coupled with inclisiran’s favorable safety profile, these findings led to its approval by both the EMA and FDA. Herein, the authors highlight the preclinical discovery and development of this agent and provide the reader with their expert perspectives. Expert opinion The evolution of gene-silencing treatments offers new perspectives in therapeutics. Inclisiran appears to have the potential to revolutionize ASCVD prevention and treatment, benefiting millions of patients. Ensuring widespread availability of Inclisiran, as well as managing additional healthcare costs that may arise, should be of paramount importance.

Trends in statin use for the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease among US adults by demographic characteristics, 1999-2020.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Statins, which are effective in preventing ASCVD, are underused, particularly for primary prevention. This study examined trends in statin use for primary ASCVD prevention from 1999 to 2020, focusing on demographic variations. Utilizing data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the present study includes individuals aged 18 years and older who had a greater than 10% risk of ASCVD over 10 years, and excluded patients with existing ASCVD. Subgroup analyses by demographic categories were performed. We calculated the changes in statin usage and used linear and quadratic tests to assess the linear and nonlinear trends in those changes. A total of 10,037 participants were included. Statin usage increased from 16.16% in 1999 to 36.24% in 2010, and 41.74% in 2020 (quadratic P-value < 0.001). In the 18-44 years age group, statin usage increased from 2.52% in 1999 to 8.14% in 2020 (linear P-value = 0.322), showing no significant linear trend. In the "never-married" group, statin usage increased from 19.16% in 1999 to 30.05% in 2020 (linear P-value = 0.256). Statin usage has shown a positive trend among populations requiring primary prevention for ASCVD. Currently, health policies are proving effective. However, the overall statin usage rate remains less than 50%. Additionally, young and never-married individuals should also receive special attention regarding statin usage as primary treatment for ASCVD.

The role of periodontitis in the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in participants with the components of metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is important in individuals with metabolic syndrome components (MetS), and periodontitis may play an important role in this process. This study aims to evaluate the association between periodontitis and ASCVD in participants with the components of MetS, including obesity, dysglycemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. This study conducted followed the MOOSE reporting guidelines and the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed and OpenGrey were searched for observational studies about the linkage of periodontitis to ASCVD in people with MetS components up to April 9, 2023. Cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies were included after study selection. Quality evaluation was carried out using the original and modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale as appropriate. Random-effects model was employed for meta-analysis. Nineteen studies were finally included in the quality analysis, and all of them were assessed as moderate to high quality. Meta-analyses among fifteen studies revealed that the participants with periodontitis were more likely to develop ASCVD in those who have dysglycemia (RR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.13-1.37; p < 0.05), obesity (RR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.02-1.24; p < 0.05), dyslipidemia (RR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.13-1.65; p < 0.05), or hypertension (1.20, 95% CI = 1.05-1.36; p < 0.05). Periodontitis promotes the development of ASCVD in participants with one MetS component (obesity, dysglycemia, hypertension or dyslipidemia). In people with MetS components, periodontitis may contribute to the ASCVD incidence.

Review of Evolocumab for the Reduction of LDL Cholesterol and Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.

Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a major causal factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Statins are the recommended first-line lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) for patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and established ASCVD, with LLT intensification recommended in the substantial proportion of patients who do not achieve levels below guideline-recommended LDL-C thresholds with statin treatment alone. The proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor monoclonal antibody evolocumab has demonstrated significant LDL-C reductions of 60% in the clinical trial and open-label extension settings, with LDL-C reductions observed early post-evolocumab initiation and maintained long term, during up to 8.4 years of follow-up. Evolocumab therapy, when added to a statin, also conferred a significant reduction in major cardiovascular (CV) events, including a 20% reduction in the composite of CV death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. The absolute benefits were enhanced among various patient types at high and very high risk for secondary ASCVD (e.g., with recent MI, multiple events or peripheral artery disease). Importantly, evolocumab treatment resulted in incremental CV risk reductions during the extended follow-up, including a 23% reduction in CV mortality and no apparent LDL-C level below which there is no further CV risk reduction. Hence, the evolocumab clinical data support the need for early and significant LDL-C lowering, especially in vulnerable ASCVD patients, in order to derive the greatest benefit in the long term. Importantly, evolocumab had no impact on any treatment emergent adverse events apart from a small increase in local injection site reactions. A growing body of real-world evidence (RWE) for evolocumab in heterogeneous populations is consistent with the trial data, including robust LDL-C reductions below guideline-recommended thresholds, a favourable safety profile even at the lowest levels of LDL-C achieved, and a high treatment persistence rate of 90%. Altogether, this review highlights findings from 50 clinical trials and RWE studies in 51,000 patients treated with evolocumab, to demonstrate the potential of evolocumab to address the healthcare gap in LDL-C reduction and secondary prevention of ASCVD in a variety of high- and very high-risk patients.

Mediating effect of diabetes on the relationship between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a prospective cohort study.

This study explored the mediating effect of diabetes on the relationship between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). In this prospective community cohort study, 82 975 participants were enrolled, with the primary outcome being the incidence of new-onset ASCVD. Using the Cox proportional hazards model, the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for ASCVD occurrence were computed between NAFLD and non-NAFLD groups. The correlation between NAFLD and diabetes was assessed using a binary logistic regression model, and that between NAFLD, diabetes and ASCVD using a mediation model. During follow-up, 9471 ASCVD cases were observed. Compared with individuals without NAFLD, those with NAFLD showed an increased ASCVD risk (HR: 1.424; 95% CI: 1.363-1.488; P < 0.001). Stratifying NAFLD based on metabolic subphenotypes revealed a higher ASCVD risk in the NAFLD combined with diabetes subgroup than in the non-NAFLD subgroup (HR: 1.960; 95% CI: 1.817-2.115; P < 0.001). NAFLD was positively associated with baseline diabetes (odds ratio: 2.983; 95% CI: 2.813-3.163; P < 0.001). Furthermore, NAFLD severity was positively correlated with diabetes risk. Mediation analysis indicated that diabetes partially mediated the effect of NAFLD on ASCVD incidence, accounting for 20.33% of the total effect. NAFLD is an independent predictor of increased ASCVD risk, which may be slightly mediated by diabetes in patients with NAFLD. Evaluating NAFLD and diabetes may be crucial in the early screening and prevention of ASCVD.