<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> Facet joint interventions include medial branch blocks (MBB), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and facet joint intra-articular injections (IA). Currently, American Society for Regional Anesthesia (ASRA) guidelines list these procedures as intermediate risk for the cervical and thoracic spine and low risk for lumbar spine. Accordingly, these guidelines recommend many anticoagulation (AC) medications and antiplatelet (AP) medications to be held or consideration made to hold for these procedures, presumably to mitigate the theoretical risk of a major bleeding complication. This is despite the fact there are few if any reports of serious bleeding complications that occur with these procedures, regardless of a patients AP or AC status. On the other hand, there is growing evidence suggests that the thrombotic complication risk of stopping these AC/AP medications for patients undergoing these facet joint interventions may exceed the hemorrhagic risk of maintaining them. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> The primary objective is to determine the risk of serious bleeding complications in patients undergoing facet targeted injections. The secondary objective is to determine if this is affected by the management of AC/AP medications. <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Retroscpective observational study. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> A total of 6,598 facet joint interventions. <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> Bleeding or hemorrhagic complications within 90 days of intervention. <h3>METHODS</h3> A retrospective observational study was conducted in a private pain practice. Consecutive patients were identified between September 19, 2009 and June 16, 2017, and it was noted if they were taking AC/AP medications prior to a procedure and how these medications were managed. In patients on AC/AP medications, charts were thoroughly reviewed for thrombotic and/or hemorrhagic complications occurring within 90 days of the procedure. For all other patients not on AC/AP medications, only the rate of clinically significant hemorrhagic events were considered given there is no inherent risk of thrombosis related to facet targeted interventions. <h3>RESULTS</h3> A total of 6,598 facet joint interventions were identified. No clinically significant bleeding complications were noted noted. Of the patient sample, 581 interventions were performed on patients prescribed AC/AP medications, with only one patient was lost to follow up. In 126 of these cases, they were performed after patients ceased AC/AP medications, with no complications noted. AC/AP medications were continued in 455 cases, also with no bleeding complications noted. Interestingly, of the 581 cases three thrombotic complications were noted in the group that had maintained AC/AP medications. <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> In this large cohort of 6,598 cervical, thoracic, and lumbar facet targeted interventions, no cases of clinically significant bleeding complications were noted. This include no cases of clinically significant bleeding in the 581 cases in which patients were on AC/AP medications, of which 455 were continued on such medications. This suggests the overall risk of significant bleeding complications with these procedures is exceedingly low. This must be considered when managing patients on AC/AP medications, as while preventing bleeding complications is important, the risk of thrombotic complications in this patient populations may be higher. This data builds upon previous research and supports individualized perioperative risk assessment when making the decision to stop or continue AC/AP medications. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Read full abstract