Introduction: Dissociative disorder is a common and distressing condition seen in children and adolescents, especially in the Indian population. It is associated with impairment in routine functioning, school absenteeism, and a significant distress and economic burden on the caregivers. There is scarcity of outcome studies in the Indian population. Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the sociodemographic and clinical profile of children and adolescents with dissociative disorder and find the outcome with treatment as usual at the end of one month. Methods: This was an observational study conducted in a tertiary care hospital over a period of one year. Fifty-one children and adolescents with mean age 14.2 years (± 2.050) with dissociative disorder (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision [ICD-10]) were included in the study. Sociodemographic and clinical details were assessed using semi-structured proforma and Children Global Assessment Scale (CGAS), and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) were used to assess baseline functioning. After one month of treatment, as usual, outcome was assessed either face-to-face or through telecommunication using CGAS, CGI-S scales. Results: Dissociative stupor (37.3%) was the most common type of presentation followed by dissociative convulsions (21.6%). Most prevalent stressor was familial (39.2%) and parenting style was authoritative (19.6%). Slow-to-warm-up temperament was most frequent (39.2%) in study subjects. At the end of one month of treatment as usual on CGAS, the percentage of subjects with obvious or serious problems reduced to 7.9 from 35.3% which was statistically significant ( P <.05). On CGI-S 56.8% of the participants significantly improved on follow-up ( P < .05). On CGI-I, 51% had much improvement, 19.1% showed very much improvement from baseline, whereas, 31.4% had minimal improvement. Conclusion: Dissociative disorders are common in adolescent age and most commonly associated with familial stressors and authoritative parenting in our study. We found a significant number improved at the end of one month with treatment as usual indicating good short-term outcomes.
Read full abstract