Prevalence Of Pelvic Floor Disorders Research Articles

Childhood nocturnal enuresis\u2014a marker for pelvic floor disorders and urinary tract symptoms in women?

Introduction and hypothesisA systematic survey on the association between childhood nocturnal enuresis (CNE) and adult pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) has not been presented previously. The aim was to describe the prevalence of PFDs and lower urinary tract symptoms in nulliparous women, with or without a history of CNE, at the age of ≥ 5 years.MethodsThis national survey of urinary (UI) and fecal incontinence (FI) and symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse (sPOP) was a random sample of 20,000 nulliparous women aged 25–64 years conducted in 2014. Women ≥ 5 years of age having CNE were compared with those without the condition. Fisher’s exact test and logistic regression adjusted for BMI and age were used to analyze differences between groups.ResultsThe response rate was 52% and 10.2% of adult women reporting CNE. One or more PFDs occurred in 38.3% of women with CNE compared to 23.8% in those without CNE (p < 0.0001). Mixed UI had the strongest association with CNE, odds ratio (OR) 2.63 (95% CI 2.03–3.40). The rate of FI was 11.2% in the non-CNE group and 16.8% in those with CNE (p < 0.0001) and sPOP 2.6% in the non-CNE and 4.8% in the CNE group (p = 0.0004), respectively. The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms was consistently higher in women with a history of CNE: overactive bladder 32.6% versus 18.4% (OR 2.34 95% CI 2.03–3.40), daytime micturition ≥ 8/day 29.6% versus 24.0% (p < 0.0001), and nocturia ≥ 2/night 12.4% versus 7.8% (p < 0.0001) in the CNE group.ConclusionPFDs and lower urinary tract symptoms in nulliparous women were approximately doubled in women with a history of CNE and could therefore act as a strong confounding factor.

Pelvic floor disorders in women with premature ovarian insufficiency: a cross-sectional study.

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of self-reported main pelvic floor disorders (PFD) (urinary incontinence [UI], pelvic organ prolapse [POP], and fecal incontinence [FI]) and its associated factors in women with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and a control group. This was a cross-sectional study wherein two groups were interviewed from August, 2017 to November, 2018-women with POI (n = 150) and a control group matched for age and body weight (n = 150). Sociodemographic variables and two questionnaires validated in Brazilian Portuguese language for PFD (Kings Health Questionnaire [KHQ] and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 [PFDI-20]) were used. Laycock's power, endurance, repetitions, fast contractions, every contraction timed (PERFECT) scale for pelvic floor muscle assessment was used in both groups. The prevalence of self-reported UI was 27.33% and 37.33% for POI and control groups (P > 0.05), respectively. There was no perceived difference regarding the prevalence of POP (9.33% POI group vs 8% control group; P = 0.682) and FI (8% POI vs 4% control group; P = 0.145). The P (power) (P = 0.46), E (endurance) (P = 0.91), R (repetitions) (P = 0.88), and F (fast contractions) (P = 0.19) values were statistically similar in both the groups. Multivariate analysis (n = 141) showed that higher weight (odds ratio [OR] 1.047 [1.018-1.076]; P < 0.001) and gravidity rates (OR 1.627 [1.169-2.266]; P < 0.01) were risk factors for UI and higher weight (OR 1.046 [1.010-1.084]; P = 0.01), and presence of comorbidities (OR 8.75 [1.07-71.44]; P < 0.01) were risk factors for POP in the POI group; there was no variable that was associated with FI. Women with POI did not have significant differences when compared with the control group regarding the prevalence of PFD and pelvic floor muscle assessment. Having higher weight and gravidity rates were associated with self-reported UI, while the presence of comorbidities and higher weight were risk factors for POP in the POI group. : Video Summary:http://links.lww.com/MENO/A555.

The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and degree of bother among women attending primary care clinics in Armenia

ObjectiveTo explore the prevalence of various Pelvic Floor Disorders (PFD) and the degree of symptom bother in a convenience sample of Armenian women in the Republic of Armenia. MethodsFifty women ages 20-85 years from each Armenian region (Marz) were included in the study. The survey included the validated Armenian version of the Global Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire (PFBQ) and general questions on demographics and comorbidities related to these disorders. ResultsA total of 540 women (90%) attending primary care clinics completed the validated PFBQ questionnaire. Initial analysis showed that the PFBQ score was significantly higher in older women, and those with higher vaginal parity and BMI. Women with prior hysterectomy (37.1+22.4) and prior pelvic prolapse or anti-incontinence surgeries (40.6+21.6) had significantly higher PFBQ scores than women without prior surgeries (18.8+20,0 and 19.4+19.7) and were associated with an increased odds of developing pelvic prolapse symptoms and obstructed defecation. ConclusionsPFD symptoms were observed to be common and significantly correlated with demographic characteristics and self-reported comorbidities in Armenian women. We need to start promoting proper training of physicians in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery.

Meshy business: MRI and ultrasound evaluation of pelvic floor mesh and slings.

Pelvic floor disorders are a complex set of conditions including but not limited to stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse that generally affect older and multiparous women. Of the several surgical options available for treatment of these conditions, synthetic mid-urethral slings for stress urinary incontinence and vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse are amenable to imaging evaluation by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Ultrasound can evaluate the sub- and immediate peri-urethral portions of sling due to its ability to differentiate synthetic material from native tissues with real-time imaging, while MRI is able to better depict the global pelvic floor anatomy and assess the more distant components of mesh and slings material. Given the high prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and complications after surgical repair, it is important that radiologists familiarize themselves with normal and abnormal imaging findings after these procedures. This article provides a review of the spectrum of imaging findings in patients after pelvic floor repair with synthetic mid-urethral slings and vaginal mesh.

MRI of the Male Pelvic Floor.

The pelvic floor is a complex structure that supports the pelvic organs and provides resting tone and voluntary control of the urethral and anal sphincters. Dysfunction of or injury to the pelvic floor can lead to gastrointestinal, urinary, and sexual dysfunction. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders is much lower in men than in women, and because of this, the majority of the published literature pertaining to MRI of the pelvic floor is oriented toward evaluation of the female pelvic floor. The male pelvic floor has sex-specific differences in anatomy and pathophysiologic disorders. Despite these differences, static and dynamic MRI features of these disorders, specifically gastrointestinal disorders, are similar in both sexes. MRI and MR defecography can be used to evaluate anorectal disorders related to the pelvic floor. MRI can also be used after prostatectomy to help predict the risk of postsurgical incontinence, to evaluate postsurgical function by using dynamic voiding MR cystourethrography, and subsequently, to assess causes of incontinence treatment failure. Increased tone of the pelvic musculature in men secondary to chronic pain can lead to sexual dysfunction. This article reviews normal male pelvic floor anatomy and how it differs from the female pelvis; MRI techniques for imaging the male pelvis; and urinary, gastrointestinal, and sexual conditions related to abnormalities of pelvic floor structures in men.Online supplemental material is available for this article.©RSNA, 2019.

Age-associated changes in the mechanical properties of human cadaveric pelvic floor muscles

Proper function of the female pelvic floor requires intact pelvic floor muscles (PFMs). The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) increases substantially with age, in part due to clinically identified deterioration of PFM function with age. However, the etiology of this decline remains largely unknown. We previously demonstrated that PFMs undergo age-related fibrotic changes. This study sought to determine whether aging also impacts PFMs’ passive mechanical properties that are largely determined by the intramuscular extracellular matrix. Biopsies from younger (≤52y) and older (>52y) female cadaveric donors were procured from PFMs, specifically coccygeus (C) and two portions of the levator ani - iliococcygeus (IC) and pubovisceralis (PV), and the appendicular muscles - obturator internus (OI) and vastus lateralis (VL). Muscle bundles were subjected to a passive loading protocol, and stress-sarcomere length (Ls) relationships calculated. Muscle stiffness was compared between groups using 2-way ANOVA and Sidak pairwise comparisons, α < 0.05. The mean age was 43.4 ± 11.6y and 74.9 ± 11.9y in younger (N = 5) and older (N = 10) donors, respectively. In all PFMs, the quadratic coefficient of parabolic regression of the stress-Ls curve, a measure of stiffness, was lower in the younger versus older group: C: 33.7 ± 13.9 vs 87.2 ± 10.7, P = 0.02; IC: 38.3 ± 12.7 vs 84.5 ± 13.9, P = 0.04; PV: 24.7 ± 8.8 vs 74.6 ± 9.6, P = 0.04. In contrast, non-PFM stiffness was not affected by aging: OI: 14.5 ± 4.7 vs 32.9 ± 6.2, P = 0.8 and VL: 13.6 ± 5.7 vs 30.1 ± 5.3, P = 0.9. Age-associated increase in PFM stiffness is predicted to negatively impact PFM function by diminishing muscle load-bearing, excursional, contractile, and regenerative capacity, thus predisposing older women to PFDs.

Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic floor disorders during early and late pregnancy in a cohort of Austrian women

PurposeTo investigate the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) in a cohort of Austrian women either during their early or late pregnancy and to search for clinical risk factors which correlate with pelvic floor symptoms during pregnancy.MethodsA prospective study was conducted and 200 pregnant women answered the validated German pelvic floor questionnaire during their first or third trimenon of gestation. Furthermore, a multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine independent risk factors for PFDs after adjusting for confounders.Results96/200 (48%) women reported psychological strain in at least 1 of the 4 pelvic floor domains while the remaining 104 women (52%) were asymptomatic. Affected women showed a significant higher BMI, a more frequent positive family history and a higher rate of multiple pregnancies was noted compared to asymptomatic women (p < 0.05). Furthermore, a statistically significant positive correlation could be observed between BMI, smoking and mean bladder score as well as mean prolapse score, signifying more symptom bother from bladder and prolapse in smokers with high BMI. A significant positive correlation was also detected between mean bowel score and parity. In the multivariate model, high BMI (CI 1.013–1.143), positive family history (CI 0.044–0.260) and multiple pregnancies (CI 0.011–0.244) remained independently associated with pelvic floor symptoms (p < 0.05).ConclusionOur results demonstrate that pelvic floor-related quality of life during pregnancy is a prevalent condition which is strongly affected by the expectant mother’s weight as well as her family history. In addition, women with multiple pregnancies seem to be at increased risk.

Prevalence of Pelvic Floor Disorders in Female CrossFit Athletes.

This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders by symptoms in female CrossFit athletes in the United States and characterize subjects reporting pelvic organ prolapse symptoms, urinary incontinence, and fecal incontinence. A 27-question anonymous questionnaire was distributed to owners of CrossFit-affiliated gyms. Select questions from validated questionnaires were used to define symptoms. Positive responses with "moderate, or quite a bit" bother defined the presence of urinary incontinence (with stress or urgency). A response of "yes" to "having a bulge or something falling out" defined the presence of pelvic organ prolapse. A response of "yes" to "lose stool beyond your control" questions defined the presence of fecal incontinence. Three hundred fourteen respondents had mean age of 36 ± 10 years and a mean body mass index of 25.2 ± 4 kg/m. Forty-four percent reported ≥1 vaginal delivery. For each workout, respondents reported lifting mean weights of 91 to 217 lb, and 90% reported participation in ≥3 CrossFit workouts per week. Pelvic floor disorder symptoms reported included the following: pelvic organ prolapse, 3.2% (10/314); urinary incontinence, 26.1% (82/314); and fecal incontinence, 6% (19/314). Higher age, parity, and number of vaginal deliveries were associated with urinary incontinence. Higher parity and number of vaginal deliveries were associated with prolapse. Fecal incontinence was not associated with age, body mass index, or obstetric history. The prevalence of pelvic floor symptoms in female CrossFit athletes from the general population is likely similar to the general population; however, the prevalence of bothersome urinary incontinence is higher than the general population in women younger than 40 years.

Prevalence of Pelvic Floor Disorders in the Fibromyalgia Population: A Systematic Review.

This study aimed to review the literature to establish the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in the fibromyalgia population. A systematic literature search through computerized databases including PubMed and EMBASE was completed using medical subject heading (MeSH) terms from January 1, 1990 to November 1, 2017. Articles were included if the focus was prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in the population of persons with fibromyalgia. To provide consistency of diagnosis, use of the American College of Rheumatology 1990 or 2010 criteria was required. Evidence was graded according to Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care and Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scales. A total of 11 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion from 1024 articles initially identified. Only one study used the most recent 2010 American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria. There was significant heterogeneity in the reporting of fibromyalgia populations. Outcomes reported were variable and not consistent across studies; thus, data could not be pooled. There appears to be a high prevalence of gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and gynaecological dysfunction. In case-control studies, these dysfunctions appeared to be more prevalent in the fibromyalgia group than in the control populations. However, this difference could not be quantified more specifically. In conclusion, the small number of eligible studies and the variety of pelvic floor outcomes reported limited formation of conclusive prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in the fibromyalgia population. From the small number of studied patients, there may be a higher prevalence of gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and gynaecological concerns in women with fibromyalgia.

Treatment patterns of primary care physicians vs specialists prior to subspecialty urogynaecology referral for women suffering from pelvic floor disorders.

BACKGROUNDThere are approximately 25% of women in the United States suffering from pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) and this number is predicted to rise. The potential complications and increasing healthcare costs that exist with an operation indicate the importance of conservative treatment options prior to attempting surgery. Considering the prevalence of PFDs, it is important for primary care physician and specialists (obstetricians and gynecologists) to be familiar with the initial work-up and the available conservative treatment options prior to subspecialist (urogynecologist) referral.AIMTo assess the types of treatments that specialists attempted prior to subspecialty referral and determine the differences in referral patterns.METHODSThis is a retrospective cohort study of 234 patients from a community teaching hospital referred to a single female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) provider for PFD. Specialist vs primary care provider (PCP) referrals were compared. Number, length and treatment types were studied using descriptive statistics.RESULTSThere were 184 referrals (78.6%) by specialists and 50 (21.4%) by PCP. Treatment (with Kegel exercises, pessary placements, and anticholinergic medications) was attempted on 51% (n = 26) of the PCP compared to 48% (n = 88) of the specialist referrals prior to FPMRS referral (P = 0.6). There was no significant difference in length of treatment prior to referral for PCPs vs specialists (14 mo vs 16 mo, respectively, P = 0.88). However, there was a significant difference in the patient’s average time with the condition prior to referral (35 mo vs 58 mo for PCP compared to specialist referrals) (P = 0.02).CONCLUSIONOne half of the patients referred to FPMRS clinic received treatment prior to referral. Thus, specialists and generalists can benefit from education regarding therapies for PFD before subspecialty referral.

Urinary incontinence and quality of life in endometrial cancer patients after robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymph node dissection

To determine the long-term effects of lymph node dissection on lower urinary tract symptoms in patients treated for endometrial cancer. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 74 patients with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage I endometrial cancer who underwent surgical intervention with and without lymph node dissection, and evaluated them with the Urinary Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7). Patients who underwent lymph node dissection reported higher but not statistically different rates of bother by lower urinary tract symptoms compared to those without lymph node dissection. The scores for the lymph node dissection group and the control group were a mean IIQ-7 score of 14.9 ± 23 and 10.5 ± 22.9 (p=.419) and a mean UDI-6 score of 30.0 ± 25.3 and 20.7 ± 22.9 (p=.104), respectively. Lymph node dissection at the time of robotic-assisted surgery did not have a significant effect on lower urinary tract symptoms nor did it affect patient responses on quality of life questionnaires.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? The aetiology of urinary incontinence is multifactorial and there has been debate on how a patient’s surgical history affects their risk of developing urinary incontinence. Prior studies have highlighted the relationship between hysterectomy and urinary incontinence (Milsom et al. 1993). Additional research has also been done to elucidate the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in patients who have been surgically treated for endometrial cancer (Erekson et al. 2009; Nosti et al. 2012). There is limited information on how robotic-assisted lymphadenectomy during surgical staging for endometrial cancer affects patients’ urinary function and their quality of life.What do the results of this study add? In this manuscript, we demonstrate that patients who underwent robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) with lymphadenectomy neither had significant difference in lower urinary tract symptoms nor on quality of life questionnaires as compared to those who did not undergo lymphadenectomy. Worsening of quality of life in regards to urinary incontinence should not be considered a factor of long term surgical morbidity associated with lymph node dissection.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? There is a need for further studies that focus on the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in patients after undergoing surgical staging for endometrial cancer and potential interventions that may address these issues.

Parity: a risk factor for decreased pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance in middle-aged women.

The incidence of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) dysfunction increases rapidly with menopause and aging. Despite the raised magnitude and prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in middle-aged women, the risk factors underlying PFM dysfunction still remain to be identified. PFM function can be clinically measured as the maximum strength and endurance using manometry. The aim of this study was to evaluate PFM function in terms of strength and endurance by perineometer and to assess the risk factors that decrease PFM strength and endurance in middle-aged women. This was a cross-sectional study. Overall, 125 parous women (age 40-60years) completed the study. A questionnaire was used to collect information on several demographic and obstetric variables. The Peritron perineometer measured PFM strength and endurance. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the effects of sociodemographic variables on PFM function. Both average strength of PFMs and maximum muscle strength significantly reduced as the number of parity increased. Average and maximum strength of PFMs showed a significant difference between women with parities of two and one (β = -0.435, p < .001; β = -0.441, p < 0.001, respectively). Both were even more influenced in women with parity of three (β = -0.503, p < .001; β = -0.500, p < .001). However, PFM endurance did not decrease with increasing parity number until the parity of two; however, it decreased in women with parity of three (β = -0.302, p < 0.05). Parity appeared to have a dominant influence on weakness of PFM, and strength was more significantly associated with parity than endurance in middle-aged women.

Pelvic floor disorders and health-related quality of life in older women: Results from the Women’s Gynaecological Health study in Lieto, Finland

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to analyse the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and to describe health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among older women. We also compared participants' HRQoL with the age-matched general female population and analysed factors associated with HRQoL. Study designThis is a population-based study of a cohort of women born in 1948 and in 1950 (n = 143) which is also part of the Women's Gynaecological Health study in Lieto, Finland. MethodsThe data were collected by questionnaires which pertained to socio-demographics, health-related variables, pelvic floor disorders and HRQoL (15D). Linear model was conducted to estimate a model of factors that associated with HRQoL. ResultsThe prevalence of urinary incontinence, faecal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse was 50%, 13% and 12%, respectively. The overall HRQoL score of the study cohort is broadly similar to that of the agematched general Finnish female population (mean±SD15D scores 0.905±0.084 vs 0.912±0.077). Higher number of medications was the most important explanatory factor for lower HRQoL. ConclusionUrinary incontinence was common; however, the impact on HRQoL was minor. The overall HRQoL score of the study cohort was broadly similar to that of age-matched general female population. Women who used a higher number of medications had lower HRQoL compared to women who used fewer medications.

Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry in functional anorectal disorders: results from a large observational cohort study.

The aim of the study was to describe the results of 3D high-resolution anorectal manometry (3DHRAM) in a large cohort of patients with functional anorectal disorders. In this single-center retrospective study, all consecutive patients referred for investigation of fecal incontinence (FI) or dyssynergic defecation (DD) underwent 3DHRAM. The parameters analyzed were usual manometric data, repartition of dyssynergic patterns, and the prevalence of a new "muscular subtype classification" underlying dyssynergia, anal sphincter defects, and pelvic floor disorders. Final analyses were performed in 1477 patients with a mean age 54 ± 16years; 825 patients suffered from DD, and 652 patients suffered from FI. Among these patients, 86% met the diagnostic criteria for dyssynergia. Type II dyssynergia was the most frequently observed (56%) in women and men suffering from FI and in women with DD. Type I was the most frequently observed in men with DD (49%). Regarding the muscle type subgroups, combined puborectalis muscle involvement with an external anal sphincter profile was the most frequently observed. The global prevalence of rectal intussusception and excessive perineal descent were 12% and 21%, respectively. Type III dyssynergia was more frequently associated with pelvic floor disorders than were other types of dyssynergia (p < 0.001). This large cohort study provides reference values for 3DHRAM in patients with functional anorectal disorders. Further studies are necessary to assess the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in healthy volunteers and to develop new scores and classifications including all of these new parameters.

Prevalence of neuropathic pain and pelvic floor disorders among females seeking physical therapy for chronic low back pain.

Aims:Female patients often seek physical therapy (PT) for chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of pelvic floor disorder (PFD) and the association between PFD and neuropathic pain (NP) in a population of women referred to PT for CLBP, as these parameters are rarely investigated in this context.Materials and Methods:This cross-sectional survey study included women aged 30–60 years who were referred to PT for CLBP. In addition to demographic and clinical information, the patients completed structured assessment questionnaires such as the validated Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), which was used to determine the prevalence of PFD, and the self-completed Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs to differentiate nociceptive pain from NP.Results:Among the 225 women included in the study, the mean body mass index was 31.6 ± 4.7 and the mean age was 46.7 ± 7.7 years (~79% were older than 40 years). The majority were not employed (i.e., homemakers), currently married, and sexually active. In addition, almost all had children (approximately 69% were grand multiparous), the majority of whom had been delivered through spontaneous vaginal delivery. Approximately 33% of women were postmenopausal and only 3% used hormone replacement therapy. Slightly more than half suffered from NP and approximately 43% experienced at least one PFD. Notably, patients with NP had significantly higher PFDI-20 overall and subscale scores, compared to those without NP.Conclusions:Although PFD and NP are not routinely assessed in PT practice, both conditions are prevalent among and may interact in women with CLBP.

Factors associated with pelvic floor disorders in Kersa District, eastern Ethiopia: a community-based study

Pelvic floor disorders, which diminish the quality of life, disproportionally affect women in developing countries. However, there is a knowledge gap in the understanding of the factors associated with the problem in many countries including Ethiopia. Therefore, we aimed to assess the factors associated with pelvic floor disorders in Ethiopia. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 3432 ever-married women selected through a stratified multistage sampling procedure from the Kersa Health and Demography Surveillance System. Data were collected using structured questionnaires through face-to-face interviews. A Poisson regression model with robust variance estimation was used to investigate the association of the independent variable with pelvic floor disorder. The results are reported in adjusted prevalence ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Overall, the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders was 20.5% (95% CI: 19%-22%). Women who had no education (APR = 1.47; 95% CI: 1.06, 2.04) or had undergone five or more vaginal deliveries (APR = 1.56; 95% CI: 1.18, 2.05), an abortion (APR = 1.85; 95% CI: 1.43, 2.38) or episiotomy (APR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.90) were independently associated with having pelvic floor disorders. Obstetric events are strongly associated with pelvic floor disorders. This finding highlights the greater need for policies to focus on prevention, diagnosis and treatment services to mitigate women's suffering from pelvic floor disorders.

Strengthening validity in studies of pelvic floor disorders through qualitative research: an example from Ethiopia.

This formative qualitative follow-up study addresses validity concerns in the Dabat Incontinence and Prolapse (DABINCOP) study, which aimed to determine the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in north-west Ethiopia. A pilot study using a questionnaire validated by pelvic exam showed severe underreporting of clinically relevant pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The objective of the follow-up study was to explore the reasons behind the underreporting and to gather information to strengthen the sensitivity and local relevance of the questionnaire to be employed in the main study. A qualitative formative study nested within the DABINCOP study was carried out in rural and semiurban communities using an interpretive approach and in-depth qualitative interviews. Women (5) who had not self-reported POP in the pilot but were diagnosed with severe prolapse after pelvic examination, and health-care workers in the research team (7) were interviewed individually within 1 year of the pilot. Systematic text condensation was used in the analysis. The women explained that shame and fear of social exclusion, lack of trust in the study and data collectors, and lack of hope for cure prevented them from disclosing. The health-care workers reported weaknesses in the questionnaire and the research approach. Time pressure and competition among data collectors may have compromised women's motivation to disclose. The study indicates that qualitative research may fruitfully be employed in the formative phase of an epidemiological study on sensitive reproductive health problems to enhance local relevance of the tool and overall validity of the study.

Assessment of the Prevalence of Pelvic Floor Disorders in Both Vaginal and Cesarean Deliveries and Their Impact on the Quality of Life

Background: Pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) occurring in women comprises a broad range of clinical scenarios such as pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Aim of the work: The objectives of the present study were to estimate differences in the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders (POP & SUI) in Egyptian women by mode of delivery and their impact on patients’ quality of life using assessment questionnaire. Materials and Methods: This observational (non-interventional) cohort study was conducted on 464 parous women from the gynecologic out-patient clinic of Ain Shams Maternity University Hospital for measuring the prevalence of POP and UI regards the mode of delivery in women delivered 5 years back or more and its impact on the quality of their lives. Pelvic organ support was assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification method (POP-Q), and pelvic floor symptoms were evaluated using assessment questionnaire. Results: Our study found that compared to Cesarean Section (CS; 32.8%), vaginal delivery (VD) was associated with statistically significant increase in the occurrence (43.5%) and severity (Moderate-to-severe UI [39.6% in VD vs. 10.5% in CS]) of UI especially SUI (VD vs. CS: 62.4% vs. 51.3%). Vaginal delivery was associated with more than double the occurrence of POP (19.4% vs. 8.2% in CS), and more than triple the concomitant occurrence of both POP and SUI (9.9% vs. 2.6% in CS). Conclusion: There is a positive correlation between the mode of delivery - as an independent factor - and the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders (both pelvic organs prolapse & urinary incontinence) in parous women.

Workforce Analysis of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, 2015 to 2045.

The aim of this study was to assess how the projected increase in prevalence of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) will impact the number of patients per female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) subspecialist between 2015 and 2045. We performed a workforce analysis of FPMRS subspecialists in the United States by developing a model to predict the number of FPMRS subspecialists in 5-year increments from 2015 to 2045. Our model allowed for selection of the number of current FPMRS subspecialists, the number and sex of new FPMRS subspecialists added per year, and retirement age of FPMRS subspecialists. The number of women with PFDs from 2015 to 2045 was then predicted by applying published, age-specific prevalence rates to the 2012 US Census Projections for women aged 20 years or older. For our primary outcome, we divided the projected number of patients by the projected number of FPMRS subspecialists every 5 years from 2015 to 2045. The model predicts the number of FPMRS subspecialists will increase from 1133 to 1514 with a sex shift from 46% female to 81% female between 2015 and 2045. The number of women with ≥1 PFD is predicted to increase from 31.4 million in 2015 to 41.9 million in 2045. For our primary outcome, the number of patients per FPMRS subspecialist is projected to range from 27,870 in 2015 to 27,650 in 2045. The current ratio of patients per FPMRS subspecialist appears high and is predicted to remain near current levels over the next 30 years. These projections support the need for continued training of physicians skilled in treating PFDs.

Triathlete Risk of Pelvic Floor Disorders, Pelvic Girdle Pain, and Female Athlete Triad.

Our primary objective was to describe the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), pelvic girdle pain (PGP), and the female athlete triad (disordered eating, menstrual irregularities, and osteoporosis) in a female triathlete population. We also evaluated for an association between these conditions. We administered an online survey to women who self-identified as female triathletes. Using validated questionnaires, Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence Questionnaire and Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire, along with the female athlete triad questionnaire, we identified the prevalence of PFDs, PGP, and female athlete triad in this specific population. Demographic and exercise intensity were also queried to characterize these female triathletes. Three hundred eleven female triathletes responded to the Internet survey. There was a significant prevalence of PFDs with stress urinary incontinence and anal incontinence symptoms being most common (37.4% and 28%, respectively). Urgency urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse were less common (16% and 5%, respectively). Stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse were more common in parous triathletes (P = 0.001, P = 0.05). Pelvic girdle pain was noted in 18% of these triathletes but was not disabling. Twenty-four percent of participants screened positive for at least 1 arm of the female athlete triad. No association was found between the female athlete triad and PFDs. Pelvic floor disorders are common and bothersome in female triathletes. Pelvic girdle pain, while present, does not limit these athletes from their training. These female triathletes may be at risk for the female athlete triad. Female triathletes may be at risk for both metabolic and PFDs and should be screened when identified.