Prevalence Of Lymphedema Research Articles

Self-reported lower extremity lymphedema and quality of life after surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma: A population based cross-sectional study

ObjectivesSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) has replaced lymphadenectomy in staging of endometrial carcinoma. The aims of the study were to explore the prevalence of self-reported lymphedema (LEL), identify factors associated with LEL, compare quality of life (QoL) scores using thresholds of clinical importance, and assess correlation between different questionnaires. MethodsWomen who underwent staging for endometrial carcinoma from 2006 to 2021 were invited to complete the Lower Extremity Lymphedema Screening Questionnaire (LELSQ), EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-EN24 and EQ-5D-5L. ResultsOf 2156 invited survivors, 61% participated in the study, whereof 1127 were evaluable by LELSQ. The LEL prevalence was 51%, 36% and 40% after lymphadenectomy, SLN and hysterectomy, respectively (p < 0.001). Higher BMI, undergoing lymphadenectomy and receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with LEL; odds ratios 1.07 (95% CI 1.05–1.09), 1.42 (95% CI 1.03–1.97) and 1.43 (95% CI 1.08–1.89) respectively. QoL was lower for women with LEL compared to those without. In women with musculoskeletal complaints the prevalence of LEL was 59%, 50% and 53% after lymphadenectomy, SLN and hysterectomy (p = 0.115), respectively, compared to 39%, 17% and 18% (p < 0.001) in women without musculoskeletal complaints. Spearman's correlation was moderate to strong between the questionnaires. ConclusionSLN implementation is not associated with increased LEL prevalence compared to hysterectomy alone, but is associated with a significantly lower prevalence compared to lymphadenectomy. LEL is associated with lower QoL. Our study demonstrates moderate to strong correlation between self-reported LEL and QoL scores. Available questionnaires may not distinguish between symptoms caused by LEL and musculoskeletal disease.

Parental perspectives on Phelan-McDermid syndrome: Results of a worldwide survey

Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMS) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by hypotonia, speech problems, intellectual disability and mental health issues like regression, autism and mood disorders. In the development, implementation and dissemination of a new clinical guideline for a rare genetic disorder like PMS, the parental experienced perspective is essential. As information from literature is scarce and often conflicting the European Phelan-McDermid syndrome guideline consortium created a multi-lingual survey for parents of individuals with PMS to collect their lived experiences with care needs, genotypes, somatic issues, mental health issues and parental stress. In total, we analysed 587 completed surveys from 35 countries worldwide. Based on parental reporting, PMS appeared to be caused by a deletion of chromosome 22q13.3 in 78% (379/486) of individuals and by a variant in the SHANK3 gene in 22% (107/486) of the individuals. Parents reported a wide variety of developmental, neurological, and other clinical issues in individuals with PMS. The most frequently experienced issues were related to speech and communication, learning disabilities/intellectual disability, and behaviour. While most reported issues were present across all age groups and genotypes, the prevalence of epilepsy, lymphoedema, and mental health issues do appear to vary with age. Developmental regression also appeared to begin earlier in this cohort than described in literature. Individuals with PMS due to a 22q13.3 deletion had a higher rate of kidney issues and lymphoedema compared to individuals with SHANK3 variants. Parental stress was high, with specific contributing factors being child and context related in accordance with the PMS phenotype. The survey results led to various validated recommendations in the European PMS guideline including an age specific surveillance scheme, specific genetic counselling, structured healthcare evaluations on sleep and communication and a focus on family well-being.

D84. Pre-operative Lymphedema Risk Factors in Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Optimizing Patient Selection for LYMPHA

PURPOSE: LYMPHA (Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach) is increasingly offered for prevention of upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer treatment, which develops in up to 47% of breast cancer patients. Prior studies have focused on intraoperative and postoperative lymphedema risk factors. This study aimed to identify preoperative risk factors, when the decision to perform LYMPHA must be made. METHODS: Retrospective review of a dedicated inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) program database was conducted. The primary outcome was self-reported lymphedema development. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify preoperative lymphedema risk factors, while controlling for number of lymph nodes removed during axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), number of positive lymph nodes, residual disease on final pathology, and need for adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of 356 patients with IBC, 134 (mean age 51 years, range 22-89 years) had complete data. Forty-seven percent developed lymphedema. Obesity (BMI>30) (OR 2.7, CI 1.2-6.4, p=0.02) and non-white race (OR 4.5, CI 1.2-23, p=0.04) were preoperative risk factors for lymphedema development. CONCLUSION: Patients with IBC are at high risk for developing lymphedema, due to their need for ALND, radiation, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study identified non-white race and obesity as additional risk factors. Due to the high prevalence of lymphedema, LYMPHA should be considered for all patients with inflammatory breast cancer. Larger prospective studies should evaluate potential racial disparities in lymphedema development.

Prevalence of lymphedema among Anderson-Fabry disease patients: A report from the Fabry registry.

Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD) is a rare X-linked lysosomal storage disease due to a genetic variation in the α-galactosidase A (GLA) gene. As a result, the activity of the α-galactosidase A (AGAL-A) enzyme is reduced or absent, which causes sphingolipid deposition within different body parts. AFD typically manifests with cardiovascular, renal, cerebrovascular, and dermatologic involvement. Lymphedema is caused by sphingolipid deposition within lymphatics. Lymphedema can cause intolerable pain and limit daily activities. Very limited data exist on lymphedema in AFD patients. Using data from the Fabry Registry (NCT00196742) with 7671 patients included (44% males and 56% females), we analyzed the prevalence of lymphedema among AFD patients who were ever assessed for lymphedema and studied the age of first reported lymphedema. Additionally, we assessed whether patients received AFD-specific treatment at some point during their clinical course. The data was stratified by gender and phenotype. Our study showed that lymphedema occurred in 16.5% of the Fabry Registry patients who were ever assessed for lymphedema (n = 5487). Male patients when compared to female patient have higher prevalence (21.7% vs 12.7%) and experienced lymphedema at a younger age (median age at first reported lymphedema of 43.7 vs 51.7 years). When compared to other phenotypes, classic phenotype has the highest prevalence of lymphedema with the earliest reported lymphedema. Among those who reported lymphedema, 84.5% received AFD-specific treatment during their clinical course. Lymphedema is a common manifestation of AFD in both genders, with a tendency to present later in female patients. Recognition of lymphedema can offer an important opportunity for intervention and potential impact on associated morbidity. Additional future studies are needed to characterize the clinical implications of lymphedema in AFD patients and identify additional treatment options for this growing population.

Abstract P2-14-10: Axillary Reverse Mapping Aids in Reducing the Rates of BCRL in Underserved Ethnically Diverse Population

Abstract Background: Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema (BCRL), is a long-term side effect affecting the patient’s quality of life after lymph node surgery. Historically BCRL is seen in 5-7% and 15-40% of patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) respectively; with the risk increasing two-fold in low-income and ethnic minority groups. Axillary Reverse Mapping (ARM) is a novel technique to distinguish drainage pathways of the arm and breast, and prior studies have reported significantly lower rates of BCRL with ARM. Lymphatic re-approximation can prevent and/or reduce lymphedema rates in cases where crossover nodes are encountered. Furthermore, blue nodes can be preserved during ALND; however, if resected during ALND, lymphatic venous (LYMPHA) procedure can help to restore lymphatic flow. However, there is a paucity of literature looking at the utility of ARM in ethnically minority groups. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of lymphedema in our patient population with breast cancer undergoing SLNB and ALND using ARM and in turn compare these findings to historical controls. Materials &amp; Methods: A retrospective study was carried out on patients who underwent axillary surgery with ARM from January 2019 to July 2021. Patient demographics such as age, BMI, gender, and ethnicity were recorded. Patients undergoing mastectomy vs breast conservation with SLNB ± ALND associated with ARM were monitored for lymphedema for a year at 3-month intervals using SOZO® scores, and then for another 2 years clinically. At each follow-up, SOZO® scores were computed using bioimpedance spectroscopy and compared to preoperative baseline scores. Results: A total of 142 patients’ data was evaluated, of which 83.8% belonged to the minority group (African American = 46, Hispanic = 63, Asian = 10). Mean BMI accounted for 29.1+5.31. Breast conservation surgery and mastectomy were performed in 71.8% (n=102) and 28.1% (n=40) of patients respectively. SLNB was performed on 88.7% (n=126) of the patients and ALND was carried out on 11.3% (n=16). Furthermore, 73.9% (n=105) of the patients underwent radiation therapy. Positive lymph nodes were identified in 24.6% (n=35) of patients. Blue nodes and blue lymphatics were encountered in 17.6% (n=25) and 32.4% (n=46) of patients respectively. Out of the blue nodes identified (n=25), 44% (n=11) were excised and 32% (n=8) were diagnosed as crossover nodes. All the crossover nodes were resected but none of them contributed to the development of lymphedema. Moreover, 90.9% of the patients with blue lymphatics underwent lymphatic re-approximation after excision of the blue nodes. Of the 142 patients, 59 had a three-month follow-up of which 2 patients (3.4%) developed clinical lymphedema diagnosed via SOZO® who had undergone SLNB which resolved by 6-month follow-up. Additionally, compared to the historical incidence of BCRL which accounts for up to 40.4% in ethnic minorities, we found a significantly lower incidence of lymphedema (p&amp;lt; 0.001) in our patient population. Moreover, in our study, ALND and radiation therapy did not contribute to lymphedema rates. Conclusion: ARM procedure can significantly lower BCRL even in ethnically minority groups. 3.4% of patients undergoing SLNB developed BCRL, which was significantly lower than historically reported data. Furthermore, in our study, no patients who underwent ALND developed lymphedema. Also, crossover nodes or radiation therapy did not contribute to the development of lymphedema after surgery demonstrating the effectiveness of ARM technique. Further studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up duration are necessary to better understand the utility of ARM technique in this population. Table 1 Baseline characteristics and follow-up data of the patients undergoing Axillary Reverse Mapping with SLNB ± ALND Citation Format: Fardeen Bhimani, Maureen McEvoy, Kelly Johnson, Sheldon Feldman. Axillary Reverse Mapping Aids in Reducing the Rates of BCRL in Underserved Ethnically Diverse Population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-14-10.

Prevalence and determinants of lymphedema in newly diagnosed Nigerian breast cancer patients using bioimpedance estimations.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is common and has significant impact on quality of life. Very little is known about BCRL in sub-Saharan Africa. Generally, BCRL has been mostly evaluated post treatment, with very limited data on the prevalence of pre-treatment BCRL at baseline. This study presents the prevalence and clinical associations of lymphedema among newly diagnosed, treatment-naive breast cancer patients in a Nigerian cohort using bioimpedance estimations. Consecutively consenting, newly diagnosed, treatment-naive breast cancer patients were assessed for upper limb lymphedema using bioimpedance measurements of the extracellular fluid and the single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis value at 5 kHz. Patients were classified as having lymphedema if there was >10% difference in arm measurements or if the ratios of the arm measurements were >3 SD above a normative mean generated from representative controls. Regression analysis was performed to determine clinical variables associated with lymphedema. There were 154 breast cancer patients with a median age of 47 (40.0-56.8) years and a body mass index of 27 (23.5-30.9) kg/m2. The majority (70%) had stage III disease. All measurements were significantly higher in cases than controls. Using various definitions, the prevalence of lymphedema was between 11.7% and 14.3%. Various clinical variables relating to clinical stage were significantly associated with lymphedema. The predominance of locally advanced disease in the Nigerian setting is associated with high pre-treatment lymphedema rates. This may set the stage for higher rates in the post-operative setting. Management of lymphedema should be incorporated into the treatment planning.

Lymphatic endothelial cell RXRα is critical for 9-cis-retinoic acid-mediated lymphangiogenesis and prevention of secondary lymphedema.

Secondary lymphedema is a debilitating disease characterized by abnormal soft tissue swelling and caused by lymphatic system dysfunction. Despite a high prevalence of secondary lymphedema after cancer treatments, current management is supportive and there are no approved therapeutic agents that can thwart disease progression. We have previously demonstrated that 9-cis-retinoic acid (9-cisRA) has the potential to be repurposed for lymphedema as it mitigates disease by promoting lymphangiogenesis at the site of lymphatic injury. Although the efficacy of 9-cisRA has been demonstrated in previous studies, the mechanism of action is not completely understood. In this study, we demonstrate that when RXRα is specifically deleted in lymphatic endothelial cells, 9-cisRA fails to induce lymphangiogenesis in vitro and prevent pathologic progression of postsurgical lymphedema in vivo. These findings demonstrate that downstream nuclear receptor RXRα plays a critical role in the therapeutic efficacy of 9-cisRA in postsurgical lymphedema.

The Prevalence of Lower Limb and Genital Lymphedema after Prostate Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review.

(1) Background: Secondary lymphedema is a chronic, progressive, and debilitating condition with an important impact on quality of life. Lymphedema is a frequently reported complication in oncological surgery but has not been systematically studied in the setting of prostate cancer. (2) Methods: Pubmed/MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched to identify articles reporting on lower limb or genital lymphedema after primary treatment (surgery of radiation therapy) of the prostate and the pelvic lymph nodes in men with prostate cancer. Primary outcome was the prevalence of lower limb and genital lymphedema. (3) Results: Eighteen articles were eligible for qualitative synthesis. Risk of bias was high in all included studies, with only one study providing a prespecified definition of secondary lymphedema. Eleven studies report the prevalence of lower limb (0-14%) and genital (0-1%) lymphedema after radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) Seven studies report a low prevalence of lower limb (0-9%) and genital (0-8%) lymphedema after irradiation of the pelvic lymph nodes. However, in the patient subgroups that underwent pelvic irradiation after staging pelvic lymph node dissections, the prevalence of lower limb (18-29%) and genital (2-22%) lymphedema is substantially elevated. (4) Conclusion: Prostate cancer patients undergoing surgery or irradiation of the pelvic lymph nodes are at risk of developing secondary lymphedema in the lower limbs and the genital region. Patients receiving pelvic radiation after pelvic lymph node dissection have the highest prevalence of lymphedema. The lack of a uniform definition and standardized diagnostic criteria for lower limb and genital lymphedema hampers the accurate estimation of their true prevalence. Future clinicals trials are needed to specifically evaluate secondary lymphedema in patients undergoing prostate cancer treatments, to identify potential risk factors and to determine the impact on quality of life.

Role of weight lost in breast cancer-related lymph

ObjectiveAnalysis of data collected in routine clinical practice of the combined impact of both physical activity and decrease in body mass index (BMI) on a minor prevalence of lymphedema in post-breast cancer patients. MethodsAnalysis of data obtained by the specialized rehabilitation unit, from 99 female patients for 18 months, after a specific diet, sports program and complete decongestive therapy (CDT) was indicated. Personal data, affected organ volume, weight, physical activity level and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Questionnaire for Breast Cancer (FACT-B+4) were collected in follow-up visits. ResultsAlthough the average of body-mass index showed no change during the assessment period, about 13% of patients in the second follow-up visit and 30% in the third one had lost weight. Women experiencing weight-loss in the third follow-up visit presented a reduced volume of the affected organ [−50 (−248 to 141) ml vs. 130 (−148 to 355) ml, p<0.05] as compared to weight-gaining patients. No relationship was established between physical activity and lymphedema volume changes. ConclusionsApart from the conventional treatment with orthotics and manual lymph drainage, BCRL prevention and treatment needs to focus – right from the start – on weight management or weight-loss in obese patients.

Getting Ready for Wound Certification: Factors Impeding Wound Healing.

Getting Ready for Wound Certification: Factors Impeding Wound Healing.

Paediatric lymphoedema: An audit of patients seen by the paediatric and primary lymphoedema group of vascular European Reference Network (VASCERN)

Little is known about the overall prevalence of lymphoedema in children and the types of paediatric lymphoedema seen by specialist centres. Therefore, this study was aimed to provide a profile of children with primary or secondary lymphoedema seen by the expert centres of the paediatric and primary lymphoedema working group (PPL-WG) of VASCERN and to compare the profile between the different countries.A retrospective review of all children (aged up to 18 years) seen for the first time by the expert centres over one year (2019) was carried out. Lymphoedema-, patient- and genetics-related data was collected and described for the whole group and compared between the different European countries/UK.In 2019, a total of 181 new children were seen by eight expert centres. For primary lymphoedema, the phenotype was based on the St George's classification of lymphatic anomalies. The percentages diagnosed according to each category were: 7.2% for syndromic lymphoedema, 2.8% for systemic/visceral involvement, 30.4% for congenital, 35.9% for late-onset lymphoedema and 19.3% for vascular/lymphatic malformations. 4.4% had secondary lymphoedema. Nearly 10% of all children had had at least one episode of cellulitis. The median delay from onset of symptoms to being seen by an expert centre was 2.4 years. In 44.4% of the children with primary lymphoedema a genetic test was performed, of which 35.8% resulted in a molecular diagnosis. Across the different centres, there was a wide variety in distribution of the different categories of paediatric lymphoedema diagnosed and the frequency of genetic testing.In conclusion, this paper has demonstrated that there is a large delay between the onset of paediatric lymphoedema and the first visit in the expert centres and that an episode of cellulitis is a relatively common complication. Diagnostic variation across the centres may reflect different referral criteria. Access to genetic testing was limited in some centres. It is recommended that these issues are addressed in the future work of the PPL-WG to improve the referral to the expert centres and the consistency in service provision for paediatric lymphoedema in Europe.

Impact of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy on Upper Limb Morbidity in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

To evaluate the impact of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) on upper limb (UL) morbidity in breast cancer patients. Axillary de-escalation is motivated by a desire to reduce harm of ALND. Understanding the impact of axillary surgery and disparities in operative procedures on postoperative arm morbidity would better direct resources to the point of need and cement the need for de-escalation strategies. Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were searched from 1990 until March 2020. Included studies were randomized-controlled and observational studies focusing on UL morbidities, in breast surgery patients. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The prevalence of UL morbidity comparing SLNB and ALND at <12 months, 12 to 24 months, and beyond 24 months were analyzed. Sixty-seven studies were included. All studies reported a higher rate of lymphedema and pain after ALND compared with SLNB. The difference in lymphedema and pain prevalence between SLNB and ALND was 13.7% (95% confidence interval: 10.5-16.8, P <0.005) and 24.2% (95% confidence interval: 12.1-36.3, P <0.005), respectively. Pooled estimates for prevalence of reduced strength and range of motion after SLNB and ALND were 15.2% versus 30.9% and 17.1% versus 29.8%, respectively. Type of axillary surgery, greater body mass index, and radiotherapy were some of the predictors for UL morbidities. Prevalence of lymphedema after ALND was higher than previously estimated. ALND patients experienced greater rates of lymphedema, pain, reduced strength, and range of motion compared with SLNB. The findings support the continued drive to de-escalate axillary surgery.

Prevalence and management of filarial lymphoedema and its associated factors in Lindi district, Tanzania: A community-based cross-sectional study.

To determine the burden and management of filarial lymphoedema and its associated factors in Lindi district, Tanzania. Cross-sectional study involving 954 community members who were screened for filarial lymphoedema by using a checklist. Moreover, lymphoedema patients were examined for the presence of entry lesions, staging of disease, and interviewed on acute dermatolymphangioadenitis (ADLA) attacks, and their current practices on lymphoedema management. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were performed. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The prevalence of filarial lymphoedema was 7.8%, with the majority in the early stage of lymphoedema (78.4%). The large majority (98.6%) of the patients had lower limb lymphoedema and 46% of lymphoedema patients had entry lesions. More than a half (60.8%) of those lymphoedema patients had experienced ADLA attacks; close to two-thirds (64.8%) had one or two attacks in the past 6 months. Generally, patients had inappropriate hygiene care practices for filarial lymphoedema management. Inappropriate hygiene care practice for lymphoedema management was associated with an increased risk for the development of advance stage of lymphoedema (adjusted odds ratio=7.379, 95%, confidence interval: 3.535-16.018, p=0.04). Though lymphatic filariasis transmission has drastically declined, chronic manifestations of lymphoedema persist in Lindi district. The recommended disease management practices are deficient, which calls for a programmatic approach for mapping the burden of lymphoedema and implementing its management.

High recurrence of lymphedema and influencing factors in discharged breast cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multicenter, cross-sectional survey.

BackgroundThere has been a delay in the detection and treatment of lymphedema in breast cancer patients during the lockdown owing to quarantine and limited social activity. Moreover, this scenario has caused psychosocial issues in these patients. Given that there is scarce information on the prevalence and influence of lymphedema during the coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) pandemic, we aimed to estimate the prevalence of lymphedema recurrence and its influencing factors among discharged breast cancer patients during the COVID‐19 pandemic.MethodsThis was a multicenter, cross‐sectional, hospital‐based survey of discharged breast cancer patients was conducted during the COVID‐19 pandemic in eight first‐class hospitals in Wuhan, China. The Norman Questionnaire was used to assess lymphedema. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors influencing moderate or severe lymphedema. Differences in living characteristics, anxiety, and depression were compared between the no/mild lymphedema group and the moderate/severe lymphedema groups. Preferences for lymphedema management during the pandemic were determined.ResultsOverall, 202 patients were included in this study, and 191 of them reported recurrent lymphedema (prevalence: 94.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 90.5% to 97.3%). Among them, 134 and 57 had mild and moderate/severe lymphedema, respectively. In 191 patients, the main symptoms were swelling (140; 69.3%) and pain (56, 27.7%). Multivariable regression showed that older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02–1.10), radical surgery (OR = 4.35, 95% CI: 1.54–12.50), and fully complete radiotherapy (OR = 2.62, 95% CI: 1.17–5.87, p = 0.019) were associated with an elevated risk of moderate/severe lymphedema. The moderate/severe lymphedema group experienced a higher rate of anxiety and depression than the no/mild lymphedema group did. Patients equally preferred treatment in the hospital and self‐care at home.ConclusionDuring the COVID‐19 pandemic, high prevalence of lymphedema was observed in patients Age, radical surgery and fully completed radiotherapy were associated with increased risk of severer lymphedema. Meanwhile, the patients with severe lymphedema experienced psychological distress. While the Covid‐19 pandemic was still raging, continuous efforts should be made to identify patient at risk of lymphedema and distribute feasible guidance and education for self‐management in lymphedema.

Lymphedema After Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: Prevalence and Risk Factors-A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Background: Lymphedema may develop when axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) injures and obstructs the lymph ducts in the upper limb. In patients with breast cancer, lymphedema is difficult to treat and can cause arm swelling, heaviness, and restricted movement. We aimed to identify the prevalence and risk factors for lymphedema after ALND in patients with breast cancer. Methods and Results: This retrospective study included 175 patients with breast cancer who underwent ALND in the Nagasaki University Hospital, Japan, between 2005 and 2018. Lymphedema was defined as symptomatic arm swelling with a >2-cm difference in the arm circumference between the affected and contralateral arms. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of lymphedema. Surgical and pathological findings were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, including the chi-square test, Student's t-test, and logistic regression analysis. Lymphedema was prevalent in 20% of the study participants, and the mean time interval from surgery to development of lymphedema was 479 days. In the univariate analysis, a body mass index of >26 kg/m2, smoking, radiotherapy (RT), and dissection of >18 axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) significantly increased the risk of lymphedema. In the multivariate analysis, smoking, RT, and dissection of >18 ALNs significantly increased the risk of lymphedema. Conclusions: The prevalence of lymphedema in our study was 20%. Our findings suggest that smoking, RT, and dissection of >18 ALNs are risk factors for lymphedema. Aggressive and empiric ALND might be associated with axillary lymph duct damage.

Prospective Surveillance for Breast Cancer-Related Arm Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The call to integrate prospective surveillance for lymphedema into cancer care pathways is building momentum to enable early intervention and prevent the progression of the condition. We offer a critical evaluation of the literature on prospective surveillance and early management for cancer-related lymphedema and evaluate the effect of such programs in preventing chronic lymphedema (CRD42019137965). Five databases and two registries were searched for randomized controlled trials or observational studies that assessed the incidence or prevalence of lymphedema associated with participation in a prospective surveillance program, published until February 26, 2021. Numbers triggered for early lymphedema management, resolved, and chronic lymphedema were extracted. Pooled relative risk (trials) and pooled rate (cumulative incidence; observational studies) of chronic lymphedema was calculated. Subgroup analyses assessed the effect of study design, length of follow-up, and extent of axillary surgery. Twenty-three studies were included, of which 21 studies evaluated breast cancer-related arm lymphedema (BCRaL). Participation in prospective surveillance with early management reduced the risk of chronic BCRaL versus usual care (relative risk 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.95; two randomized controlled trials; N = 106). The pooled rate of chronic BCRaL was 4% (95% CI, 3 to 6; 15 observational studies; N = 3,545), and 6% (95% CI, 4 to 9) when restricted to participants with axillary lymph node dissection (12 studies; N = 1,527). The findings suggest that participation in prospective surveillance with early management reduces the risk of chronic BCRaL. Only a minority of patients at high risk of lymphedema because of axillary surgery developed chronic lymphedema. More robust research is needed to determine whether prospective surveillance with early management can reduce the risk of chronic lymphedema, particularly among cancer survivors other than breast cancer.

Evaluation of Relative Abundance of Lymphedema after Reverse Axillary Mapping in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Background:The axillary reverse mapping (ARM) technique identifies and preserves arm nodes during sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Here, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of lymphedema following ARM.Materials and Methods:This is a clinical trial that was performed in 2019-2020 in Isfahan on patients with breast cancer in the early stages. Demographic and initial information of all cases including age and body mass index (BMI) was collected. Patients were then underwent SLNB ± ALND associated with ARM and were followed up for lymphedema every 6 months to a year. The occurrence of lymphedema was assessed.Results:By evaluating data of 102 patients, we found that 10 patients (9.8%) had lymphedema and patients with lymphedema had significantly higher age (P = 0.004), higher BMI (P = 0.001), larger tumor size (P = 0.018), and longer surgery duration (P < 0.001). The frequency of menopausal women was higher in patients with lymphedema compared to other cases (P = 0.001).Conclusion:The prevalence of lymphedema was high among patients undergoing ARM that was associated with factors including higher age, higher BMI, prolonged surgery duration, larger tumor size, and menopause. We believe that further comparative studies should be conducted on this issue.

Prevalence and Impact of Chronic Edema in Bariatric Patients: A LIMPRINT Study.

Background: Chronic edema (CO) is a complex condition, arising from different factors, including immobility and obesity. Edema and obesity can have a significant impact on quality of life of patients and their families. Understanding how to manage edema in obese patients is an increasing challenge for both patients and clinicians. As effective treatment options are limited for this population, it is more cost-effective for patients to lose weight before starting treatment. When patients cannot maintain weight loss, one option is to have bariatric surgery. This study was part of LIMPRINT: Lymphedema IMpact and PRevalence INTernational, a study with the aim of identifying the prevalence and impact of CO in different countries and health care settings. Study Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence and impact of CO among patients in a United Kingdom bariatric surgical service. Methods and Results: The gold standard pitting test assessed the presence of edema. General (EuroQOL-5 Dimensions [EQ-5D], RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, Version 1.0 [SF-36], Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale [GAD-7] and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]), and edema-specific (Lymphedema Quality of Life [LYMQOL]) quality-of-life questionnaires were used to evaluate impact of edema. The prevalence of edema was 52.1% (25 of 48 participants had edema), potentially linked to obesity, immobility, and medications. Most participants had International Society of Lymphology (ISL) Stage I edema. There were no statistically significant differences between the quality of life of participants with and without edema. However, comparing SF-36 results and normative population data indicated that quality of life was much lower than those in the normative population. Conclusions: This study highlights the high prevalence of edema and low quality of life of this bariatric population. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03154593.

The prevalence of arm lymphedema after radiation treatment in patients with breast cancer

AbstractAim:To evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of arm lymphedema in patients with breast cancer.Materials and methods:Between 2006 and 2017, we investigated patients with breast cancer after breast surgery who received adjuvant radiotherapy at the breast or chest wall, and/or adjuvant radiotherapy at regional lymph nodes, and standard systemic chemotherapy depending on disease stage and risk factors. We assessed arm lymphedema using arm circumference measurement differences on the treated side compared with the opposite arm (≥2 cm measurements at any one position). Associations between arm lymphedema and potential risk factors were identified using statistical analysis.Results:In 308 patients, arm lymphedema prevalence was 6·2%. Patients having ≥20 lymph nodes removed (hazard ratio (HR) = 3·29; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1·12–8·87), undergoing regional lymph node irradiation (HR = 1·81; 95% CI: 1·09–13·28), and no arm and shoulder exercises after treatment (HR = 3·16; 95% CI: 1·89–5·26) had a higher risk of arm lymphedema.Findings:Arm lymphedema is a serious breast cancer complication and is a preventable morbidity. Planning arm and shoulder exercises in line with adjuvant treatments and increasing clinical awareness of early indications could help lower the risk of occurrence.

Body Fluid Trend and Prevalence of Lymphedema After Gynecological Cancer Surgery.

Background: This study aimed at understanding the trend in extracellular fluid (ECF) change and estimating the efficacy of the early complex decongestive therapy (CDT) program in terms of prevalence of lower limb lymphedema, as well as at identifying the quality of life (QoL) associated with response to CDT after gynecological cancer therapy. Methods and Results: Thirty-one patients undergoing gynecological cancer treatment were enrolled and randomly assigned to the CDT and control groups. In the CDT group, CDT was started within 2 weeks after surgery for 30 minutes a day, for 2 weeks (5 days per week). The patients' QoL was assessed through the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire; version 3. Inbody S10® (Biospace, Seoul, South Korea) was used to calculate the ECF. The assessment was performed at pre- and post-surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Statistically significant differences, in favor of the CDT group, were encountered at the 3-month follow-up visit, especially with respect to the QoL score. Regarding the prevalence of lymphedema, no significant difference was observed between groups. The mean value of the impedance ratio was low in the CDT group during the entire 12 month follow-up. Conclusions: The results of the present study show that early CDT had a positive effect on the prevalence of lymphedema and body composition. Long-term follow-up studies with a larger sample size are needed to warrant the time-group effect of early rehabilitation.