Prevalence Of Group B Streptococcus Colonization Research Articles

Group B Streptococci recto-vaginal colonization, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern, and associated factors among pregnant women at selected health facilities of Wolaita Sodo Town, Southern Ethiopia.

Streptococcus agalactiae or Group B Streptococcal colonization of the gastrointestinal and genital tracts of pregnant women usually remains asymptomatic, even though it is the critical determinant of infection in neonates and young infants. It causes early and late onset of invasive Group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease manifesting as septicemia, meningitis, and pneumonia. Now it is recognized as an important cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in many parts of the world including Ethiopia, where the magnitude of the problem has been little studied. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of GBS colonization and to identify associated risk factors and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among pregnant women at selected health facilities of Wolaita Sodo Town, Southern Ethiopia. A health-facility-based cross-sectional study design was conducted at WSUCSH & Wolaita Sodo Health Center from June to August, 2022. A total of 279 pregnant women who were in ANC follow-up at 35-37 weeks of gestation were included. For GBS isolation, recto-vaginal swabs were inoculated in 1 mL Todd-Hewitt broth medium supplemented with 10 μg/mL colistin and 15 μg/mL nalidixic acid, followed by identification of isolates based on colonial morphology, gram stains, catalase reaction, and CAMP tests. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using a modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. All collected data were entered in Epi info 4.6.0.2, then transferred and tabulated using SPSS version 20. Logistic regression analysis was used to see the association between variables. Finally, a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. In the present study, 279 pregnant mothers, aged between 15 to 38 years with a mean of 26.5 ± 4.5 years, were included. Of all participants, the highest proportion (120) (43.01%) were housewives. The overall carriage rate of GBS was 67 (24.0%). GBS colonization showed a statistically significant association with college and above levels of maternal education [AOR = 6.610, 95% CI (1.724-25.349), p = 0.01]. High susceptibility of GBS isolate was seen with Penicillin G & Chloramphenicol (92.5%), Ampicillin, Ceftriaxone (89.6%), Vancomycin (74.62%), and Erythromycin (77%). Relatively, GBS showed high resistance to Tetracycline (88%). In this study, the overall prevalence of GBS colonization was 24.0%. College and above educational level was statistically significant with GBS colonization. This study aimed to draw attention to the management of Group B Streptococci in pregnant women by making GBS culture one of the routine diagnoses during ANC follow-up and to prevent infection with early detection.

Distribution and Prevalence of Serotypes of Group B Streptococcus Isolated from Pregnant Women in 30 Countries: A Systematic Review

Abstract Objective This review aimed to compile scientific data on the distribution and prevalence of group B Streptococcus (GBS) serotypes isolated from pregnant women across 30 countries from 2010 to 2019. Methods This was a systematic review that addresses the distribution and prevalence of GBS in pregnant women. The search included studies published between January 2010 and December 2019 in PubMed, Virtual Health Library (BVS), ScienceDirect, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and LILACS databases. We also surveyed relevant articles published in English, Spanish, and Portuguese between February and April 2020. Original articles, communication, short report, theses, and dissertations were included. The prevalence of GBS colonization, method for capsular serotyping, antimicrobial resistance, distribution and prevalence of serotypes were extracted from each study. Results In all, 795 publications were identified. After applying the eligibility criteria, 48 articles were included for the final systematic analysis; most articles were from Asia and were published during the years 2014 to 2017. For the identification of serotypes, most studies used the polymerase chain reaction technique. There were records of all 10 GBS serotypes, namely, Ia, Ib, and II–IX, among the countries analyzed. GBS susceptibility and resistance to antibiotics were addressed in 37.5% of the publications analysed. Conclusion This review showed that GBS serotypes are distributed differently in the 30 analyzed countries, with serotypes Ia, Ib, and II to V being the most prevalent. Furthermore, our results highlighted the relationship of GBS with maternal colonization, implications for neonates, and antibiotic resistance.

Adherence to recommendations for preventing early neonatal sepsis associated with Streptococcus agalactiae colonization in a referral center in Bogotá, Colombia, 2019

To assess adherence to screening recommendations for the prevention of neonatal sepsis, and describe the prevalence of colonization by Group B streptococcus (GBS) as well as the perinatal outcomes associated with colonization by this bacterium. Retrospective cohort study that included pregnant women at term and their newborns, seen at a private high-complexity clinic in Bogota, between July 1 and December 31, 2019. Adherence to screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis in pregnant women colonized with group B streptococcus, as well as the prevalence of colonization and early adverse perinatal outcomes were assessed. Overall, 1928 women were included. Adherence to screening was 68.0 % (95 % CI: 66-70.1) and 87.9 % to intrapartum antibiotic administration (95 % CI: 87.8-88); non-indicated use of antibiotics occurred in 14.7 % of the women, for 86.3 % final adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis. The prevalence of GBS colonization was 12.5 % (95 % CI: 10.7-14.3); the incidence of neonatal hospitalization was 27.5 % (95 % CI: 16.3-33.7). There were no cases of mortality or early neonatal sepsis attributable to screening status, colonization or prophylactic antibiotics for GBS. Additional studies in other centers are required in order to determine adherence to this guideline, particularly in those that receive users affiliated to the subsidized regime which covers the most vulnerable population. Also, new population studies of GBS prevalence and cost-effectiveness of universal screening compared to risk factor-based antibiotic prophylaxis are needed.

Group B Streptococcus among Pregnant Women and Neonates in Saudi Arabia: A Systemic Review.

Sepsis caused by Group B Streptococcus (GBS) continues to cause mortality and morbidity in newborns, especially in developing countries. Bacterial sepsis in newborns varies nationally and even within countries. Developing countries have reported 34 deaths per 1000 live births compared to 5 in developed countries. This systemic review aimed to assess the prevalence of GBS colonization among pregnant women and the incidence of neonatal GBS sepsis in Saudi Arabia. A literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE Ovid, and Google Scholar was conducted. A total of 21 studies were found: 15 described maternal GBS colonization and 6 studies described neonatal GBS infections. The GBS colonization prevalence among pregnant women ranged from 2.1% to 32.8%. Inconsistencies in the reporting method for neonatal GBS infection rates were observed. Only two studies have the incidence of neonatal GBS as the primary outcome. No national multicenter studies exist on the GBS rates among neonates. Nationwide studies are warranted to assess the burden of GBS infections in neonates. These studies would guide appropriate GBS screening strategies during pregnancy for application in a national public health program.

Prevalence of Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant Women

Objective: To find out the prevalence of group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization in women in 3rd trimester of pregnancy. Study Design: A cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of the Study: This study was done at The Department of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, The Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Risalpur, Pakistan from 1st July 2021 to 31st December 2021. Material and Methods: We included a total of 261 pregnant women in 3rd trimester aged between 18 to 40 years irrespective of parity or gravidity status. Age, area of residence, parity status and gestational age were noted. During the vaginal examination of the pregnant women, vaginal swabs using sterilized cotton swabs were acquired from all study participants. All acquired vaginal swabs were sent to institutional pathological laboratory. Prevalence of GBS colonization was noted. Results: In a total of 261 pregnant women, mean age was 28.4±6.2 years while 178 (68.2%) women were aged between 20 to 30 years. Area of residence was rural in 162 (62.1%) women. There were 146 (55.9%) women with gestational age between 30 to 35 weeks. Majority of the women, 195 (74.7%) were multiparous. Vaginal discharge was reported in 112 (42.9%) pregnant women. Prevalence of GBS colonization was noted in 48 (18.4%) pregnant ladies. Vaginal discharges was observed to have statistically significant association with the presence of GBS colonization (p=0.0388). Conclusion: Prevalence of GBS colonization was high in pregnant ladies visiting a tertiary care hospital during 3rd trimester of pregnancy. Pregnant women with vaginal discharges were observed to have statistically significant association with the presence of GBS colonization. Keywords: Group B streptococcus, 3rd trimester, vaginal discharge, vaginal swab.

Vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal compared with vaginal-rectal culture-based screening for Group B Streptococci (GBS) colonization during the third trimester of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundScreening for maternal anogenital Group B streptococci (GBS) colonization in pregnancy with initiation of intravenous intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis as indicated has led to a significant reduction in the incidence of neonatal GBS infection. This study aims to evaluate the agreement between vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal culture and the more typically used vaginal-rectal culture for screening for maternal anogenital GBS colonization in the third trimester of pregnancy.MethodsEligible English-language studies published until January 2020 were retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Studies were compiled that assessed for GBS colonization utilizing vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal culture and vaginal-rectal culture during the third trimester of pregnancy. Nonoriginal research articles and studies that did not assess pregnant patients, did not use culture-based screening, or did not compare vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal culture with vaginal-rectal culture were excluded. The search identified 559 articles with three prospective cohort studies that met inclusion criteria, including 643 participants. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Patient characteristics and associated pain with specimen collection were abstracted. Meta-analyses of both the raw agreement and the Cohen’s kappa statistic were performed.ResultsWithin the three included studies, the range of GBS detection was 17.6–34.0%, consistent with the anticipated prevalence of GBS colonization reported in earlier publications. For both raw agreement and Cohen’s kappa coefficient, the test for heterogeneity was not significant, indicating low heterogeneity among studies. The pooled estimate of the raw agreement was 0.97 (95%CI 0.95–0.98) and of the Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87–0.95), indicating (according to the Landis and Koch criteria) an “almost perfect” agreement between the compared clinical tests. In the two studies that assessed procedure-related patient discomfort, vaginal-rectal swabbing caused more discomfort.ConclusionUse of vaginal-perineal culture for assessment of maternal GBS colonization is comparable to the more typically utilized vaginal-rectal culture and is associated with less discomfort.

Prevalence of Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant Women at a University Hospital in Korea.

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization in pregnant women is a risk factor for causing infection in neonates; therefore, GBS screening tests are performed on them. Culture methods and molecular diagnostics are mainly performed for GBS detection; however, culture methods differ in the detection rate for GBS depending on the procedure of culture. The authors intended to confirm the difference in GBS colonization rate in the conventional culture method, enrichment culture method, and molecular genetic test as screening tests for GBS. Duplicate vagino-rectal swabs were collected from 371 pregnant women between the 35th and 37th week of gestation; one was used for conventional culture method and the other was frozen at -80℃, followed by enrichment culture method and molecular genetic test. The prevalence of GBS colonization identified by conventional culture, enrichment culture, and molecular genetic test was 4.35% (17/391), 8.95% (35/391), and 22.25% (87/391), respectively. The detection rate by enrichment culture method was 2.06 times higher (17/391 vs. 35/391) than that by conventional culture method. It was identified that there was a significant difference in the detection rates of GBS between the two methods (p < 0.001). The detection rate identified in molecular genetic test was much higher at 22.25% (87/391). The concordance rate of the results from three detection methods for GBS was 80.05% (313/391). All pregnant women colonized with GBS were given intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis using cefazolin and their neonates were confirmed not to be infected with GBS. Prevalence of GBS colonization in pregnant women is shown to vary depending on detection method. Particularly, it differs greatly depending on the use of enrichment media in the culture method. Therefore, it is necessary that the microbiological laboratory implements the culture method with supplementary procedures such as selective or enrichment media in order to improve the detection rate of GBS.

Prevalence of Group B Streptococcus Colonization among Pregnant Women and Feto-Maternal Outcomes in a Tertiary Health Institution, North-Western Nigeria

Background: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection is a major cause of bacterial infections in the peri-natal period. These include amnionitis, urinary tract infections and endometritis. At birth, 50-60% of the neonates born to colonized mothers have positive cultures taken from mucus membranes and the skin. Aim: The aim of this study is to determine prevalence of GBS colonization and compare the maternal and perinatal outcomes among GBS positive and GBS negative women within 7 days postpartum. Methodology: This was a longitudinal study among pregnant women between 35-37 weeks gestation attending antenatal clinic at Usman Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto. Vaginal and rectal swabs were taken from the participants and cultured for growth of Group B Streptococcus within 24 hours. The participants were followed up to 7 days post-delivery with their newborns to determine the maternal and early neonatal outcomes. Results: One hundred and eighty five (185) women were recruited and 159 (85.9%) participants were available for follow-up to determining feto-maternal outcomes. Among the participants, 3.8% (7) had GBS vaginal colonization. There was no single case of early neonatal infection, intensive neonatal resuscitation nor neonatal mortality among both GBS positive and GBS negative women. Conclusion: It has been found that the prevalence of maternal GBS colonization during pregnancy was low and neither GBS colonization nor GBS non-colonization was associated with poor maternal or poor fetal outcomes.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant Women: A Pilot Study in Palestine.

Background Maternal Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus (GBS)) colonization is an important cause of complications in mothers and neonates during gestation and after delivery. The data regarding GBS colonization among pregnant women in Palestine is scarce. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of GBS colonization, its associated risk factors, and the antibiotic sensitivity patterns in Nablus, West Bank, Palestine. Methods A cross-sectional, single center study conducted at Rafidia Governmental Hospital in Nablus, West Bank, Palestine. Samples were collected between November 2019 and January 2020. Vaginal swabs from 200 pregnant women (≥35 weeks of gestation) attending the labor and delivery department were plated directly on CHROMagarTM StrepB (CHROM agar, France) and placed in an incubator at 35–37°C. After 24 and 48 hours, the plates were checked for growth and classified into three categories: growth of GBS with mauve colonies on chromogenic media, no growth, or other growth. The identification of the mauve colonies was confirmed by the CAMP test. Identified GBS isolates were tested for susceptibility to vancomycin, ampicillin, clindamycin, cefotaxime, erythromycin, and levofloxacin using the disc diffusion method. Clinical and demographic information were collected using a questionnaire. Result The overall prevalence of GBS colonization was 12%. The median age of the study population was 27 years. GBS colonization was significantly associated with age (p=0.013), history of previous preterm delivery (p=0.013), and parity (p=0.015). No association was noted with smoking, previous abortion, previous history of fetal demise, vaginitis, or urinary tract infection. Resistance to ampicillin, vancomycin, cefotaxime, erythromycin, clindamycin, and levofloxacin was found to be 91.7%, 54.2%, 45.8%, 29.2%, 25%, and 8.3%, respectively. Conclusion The prevalence of vaginal GBS in this study was 12% from Nablus, West Bank. Further research is needed to determine the GBS serotypes common in West Bank and the burden they cause on the health system. Moreover, this study also highlights the need to establish a screening program suited to a developing country with low control on the antibiotic's prescription protocols.

Group B Streptococcus vaginal colonization in pregnant women living with HIV infection: prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility at HIV referral centers in Lagos, Nigeria

Objectives Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization of the genital tract is often asymptomatic yet associated with increased risks of maternal and neonatal morbidity especially amongst women living with HIV infection. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of GBS colonization of the genital tract in women living with HIV infection and antibiotic susceptibility of GBS in the genital tract. Method This cross-sectional study recruited 244 pregnant women (122 women living with HIV infection and 122 HIV-uninfected women) between 35 and 37 weeks of gestation. GBS colonization was determined by collecting lower vaginal and anal swabs at recruitment. Swabs were cultured in Todd Hewitt’s broth and confirmed by Christie, Atkins, and Munch-Peterson (CAMP) test. Most recent CD4 count and viral load estimates were retrieved from the women’s records. Maternal and neonatal outcomes and antibiotic susceptibility were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed at 95% confidence interval at a statistical significance of p < .005 Results The prevalence of GBS colonization of the genital tract in all participants was 3.3%; GBS was isolated in 4 (3.3%) of 122 pregnant women living with HIV. No woman with a GBS-colonized genital tract developed puerperal sepsis and no neonatal infection occurred in neonates born to GBS-positive women, irrespective of HIV infection status. In women living with HIV, GBS isolate was resistant to Ampicillin (100%), Ceftriaxone (100%), Vancomycin (100%), yet partially sensitive to Ciprofloxacin (50%). Conclusion Pregnant women living with HIV do not have an increased risk of genital GBS colonization. Vaginal GBS colonization was not associated with an adverse perinatal outcome. Antibiotic use for GBS colonization should be based on sensitivity pattern and not empiric.

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Maternal Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Madagascar and Senegal.

Maternal group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization is a major risk factor for neonatal GBS infection. However, data on GBS are scarce in low- and middle-income countries. Using sociodemographic data and vaginal swabs collected from an international cohort of mothers and newborns, this study aimed to estimate the prevalence of GBS colonization among pregnant women in Madagascar (n = 1,603) and Senegal (n = 616). The prevalence was 5.0% (95% CI, 3.9-6.1) and 16.1% (95% CI, 13.1-19.0) in Madagascar and Senegal, respectively. No factors among sociodemographic characteristics, living conditions, and obstetric history were found to be associated independently with GBS colonization in both countries. This community-based study provides one of the first estimates of maternal GBS colonization among pregnant women from Madagascar and Senegal.

Estimation of country-level incidence of early-onset invasive Group B Streptococcus disease in infants using Bayesian methods.

Neonatal invasive disease caused by Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is responsible for much acute mortality and long-term morbidity. To guide development of better prevention strategies, including maternal vaccines that protect neonates against GBS, it is necessary to estimate the burden of this condition globally and in different regions. Here, we present a Bayesian model that estimates country-specific invasive GBS (iGBS) disease incidence in children aged 0 to 6 days. The model combines different types of epidemiological data, each of which has its own limitations: GBS colonization prevalence in pregnant women, risk of iGBS disease in children born to GBS-colonized mothers and direct estimates of iGBS disease incidence where available. In our analysis, we present country-specific maternal GBS colonization prevalence after adjustment for GBS detection assay used in epidemiological studies. We then integrate these results with other epidemiological data and estimate country-level incidence of iGBS disease including in countries with no studies that directly estimate incidence. We are able to simultaneously estimate two key epidemiological quantities: the country-specific incidence of early-onset iGBS disease, and the risk of iGBS disease in babies born to GBS-colonized women. Overall, we believe our method will contribute to a more comprehensive quantification of the global burden of this disease, inform cost-effectiveness assessments of potential maternal GBS vaccines and identify key areas where data are necessary.

Group B streptococcal colonization in elderly women

BackgroundIn non-pregnant adults, the incidence of invasive Group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease is continuously increasing. Elderly and immunocompromised persons are at increased risk of infection. GBS commonly colonizes the vaginal tract, though data on colonization in the elderly are scarce. It is unknown whether the prevalence of GBS colonization is increasing in parallel to the observed rise of invasive infection. We conducted a three-year (2017–2019) prospective observational cross-sectional study in two teaching hospitals in Switzerland to determine the rate of GBS vaginal colonization in women over 60 years and i) to compare the proportions of known risk factors associated with invasive GBS diseases in colonized versus non-colonized women and ii) to evaluate the presence of GBS clusters with specific phenotypic and genotypic patterns in this population.MethodsGBS screening was performed by using vaginal swabs collected during routine examination from women willing to participate in the study and to complete a questionnaire for risk factors. Isolates were characterized for antibiotic resistance profile, serotype and sequence type (ST).ResultsThe GBS positivity rate in the elderly was 17% (44/255 positive samples), and similar to the one previously reported in pregnant women (around 20%). We could not find any association between participants’ characteristics, previously published risk factors and GBS colonization. All strains were susceptible to penicillin, 22% (8/36) were not susceptible to erythromycin, 14% (5/36) were not susceptible to clindamycin and 8% (3/36) showed inducible clindamycin resistance. Both M and L phenotypes were each detected in one isolate. The most prevalent serotypes were III (33%, 12/36) and V (31%, 11/36). ST1 and ST19 accounted for 11% of isolates each (4/36); ST175 for 8% (3/36); and ST23, ST249 and ST297 for 6% each (2/36). Significantly higher rates of resistance to macrolides and clindamycin were associated with the ST1 genetic background of ST1.ConclusionsOur findings indicate a similar colonization rate for pregnant and elderly women.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trial ISRCTN15468519; 06/01/2017

Poor Adherence to the Screening-Based Strategy of Group B Streptococcus Despite Colonization of Pregnant Women in Greece.

Group B streptococcus (GBS) is a leading cause of serious neonatal infections. Maternal GBS colonization is associated with early- and late-onset neonatal disease (EOD/LOD). In Greece, a screening-based strategy is recommended, in which concurrent vaginal-rectal cultures should be obtained between 36 0/7 and 37 6/7 weeks’ gestation. We sought to examine the level of adherence to the GBS screening guidelines and estimate the prevalence of GBS colonization among pregnant women. Although in Greece the screening-based strategy is followed, we also examined known EOD risk factors and linked them to GBS colonization. A cross-sectional study of 604 women postpartum in three hospitals and maternity clinics was conducted. Following written informed consent, data were collected via a short self-completed questionnaire and review of patients’ records. In 34.6% of the enrolled pregnant women, no culture had been taken. Of the remaining, 12.8% had proper vaginal-rectal sample collections. The overall maternal colonization rate was 9.6%. At least one risk factor for EOD was identified in 12.6% of participants. The presence of risk factors was associated with positive cultures (p = 0.014). The rate of culture collection did not differ between women with or without an EOD risk factor. Adherence to a universal screening of pregnant women with vaginal-rectal cultures was poor. Despite probable underestimation of GBS carrier status, almost 1 in 10 participants were GBS positive during pregnancy. Screening of women with risk factors for EOD should, at least, be prioritized to achieve prevention and prompt intervention of EOD.

Clinical Profile and Outcome of Group B Streptococcal Colonization in Mothers and Neonates in Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates: A Prospective Observational Study.

Background:Maternal Group B Streptococcus (GBS)/Streptococcus agalactiae colonization rates vary worldwide; however, no such recent data are available from the United Arab Emirates (UAE).Objective:The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of GBS colonization among pregnant women attending an antenatal clinic of a hospital in Ras Al Khaimah, UAE, along with the antibiotic sensitivity pattern, the clinical profile and pregnancy (maternal and fetal) outcome.Methods:This prospective observational study routinely offered rectovaginal swab for GBS to all women attending the antenatal clinic at 35–37 weeks of pregnancy between January and December 2019. MASTASTREP kit and Vitek-2 identification system was used for culture and identification. Women with positive cultures were followed up for any maternal and neonatal complications and the use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP).Results:A total of 2295 women were included, of which 158 (6.9%) had positive cultures for GBS colonization. The carriage rate was higher in women without any risk factors for early-onset GBS disease (EOGBS) (P < 0.01). The GBS isolates were about 97% susceptible to linezolid and vancomycin, 90% to benzyl penicillin and 95% to ampicillin. Resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, erythromycin, and levofloxacin were about 77%, 57%, 57%, and 10%, respectively. Urinary tract infection in GBS colonized women were more common in those aged ≤30 years (P = 0.009). Fetal outcome was favorable in women receiving IAP for GBS colonization. No neonate had culture proven EOGBS.Conclusion:The prevalence of GBS colonization in pregnant women as well as the overall maternal and neonatal complications is low in Ras Al Khaimah, UAE. IAP is effective in preventing early-onset sepsis in newborn, and thus should be initiated in those with GBS colonization. The cultured GBS showed sensitivity to most antibiotics.

Risk Factors for Group B &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Streptococcus&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; Colonization and Drugs Sensitivity Pattern in a Nigerian Obstetric Population

Background: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a major cause of bacterial infections in the perinatal period, of which colonization prevalence among Northern-Nigerian pregnant women is scarce. We attempted to determine 1) its prevalence, 2) risk factors for GBS colonization and 3) drugs-susceptibility. Methodology: This cross-sectional study involved 185 pregnant women between 35 - 37 weeks of gestation at tertiary health center of Sokoto, Nigeria. Vaginal/rectal swabs were collected, were cultured for GBS and tested for drug-susceptibilities. The study was conducted between December, 2017 and April, 2018. Results: One hundred and eighty five (185) pregnant women participated in this study. GBS vaginal-colonization-rate was 3.8% (7/185). A significance relationship was observed between GBS-colonization and socio-economic class, as 57.10% (4/7) of the GBS positive women were of low-socio economic class (p 0.035). No associations were observed between GBS-colonization and the followings: maternal age, parity, poor obstetric outcome-history. All the 7 GBS positive cultures were sensitive to Clindamycin. One was sensitive to both Clindamycin and Ceftriaxone. None was sensitive to Penicillin. Conclusion: The prevalence of GBS colonization was low in this area. Maternal socio-economic class is found to be a risk of GBS-colonization.

Differences in maternal group B Streptococcus screening rates in Latin American countries

ObjectiveTo determine rates and results of maternal Group B streptococcus (GBS) screening during pregnancy and identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with GBS screening in Latin American countries. BackgroundGBS is a primary cause of morbidity and mortality in neonates and is prevented by screening pregnant women for GBS before delivery and intrapartum antibiotic treatment. Yet, data regarding national GBS screening practices and the epidemiology of maternal GBS colonization in Latin America are limited. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study using de-identified records of pregnant women in six Latin American countries from a regional database. 460,328 collected from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2012 met study criteria and were included. Maternal screening rates for GBS were determined, association of demographic variables (ethnicity, age, education level, and civil status) with maternal GBS screening was determined using logistic regression, odds ratios were calculated comparing incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes (sepsis, pneumonia, and meningitis) between countries with high and low rates of GBS screening, maternal GBS colonization prevalence was determined by year and association of demographic variables with maternal GBS colonization was determined using logistic regression. ResultsMaternal GBS screening was less than 15% in each country, except Uruguay which screened greater than 65% of women. The final regression model examining maternal screening rates and demographic variables included the covariates ethnicity, maternal age group, education level and civil status. Countries with lower rates of maternal GBS screening had increased odds of neonatal sepsis [OR 23.3; 95% CI (15.2–35.9)] and pneumonia [OR 19.9; 95% CI (12.1–32.6)]. In Uruguay, GBS prevalence over the study period was 18.5%. Black women, older women and women without a primary education had higher rates of GBS colonization (21.3%, 20.4% and 21.9% respectively). ConclusionsOur study highlights the need for national policy and investments to increase maternal GBS screening and better understand the prevalence of maternal GBS colonization in Latin America. Further research on the burden of neonatal GBS disease within Latin America is needed to inform the introduction of a maternal GBS vaccine, when available.

Prevalence, antimicrobial patterns, serotypes and risk factors for GBS rectovaginal isolates among pregnant women at Kenyatta Hospital

Background: Estimates of group B streptococcus (GBS) disease burden, antimicrobial susceptibility, and serotypes in pregnant women are limited for many resource-limited countries including Kenya. These data are required to inform recommendations for prophylaxis and treatment of infections due to GBS. Methods and materials: We evaluated the prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, serotypes, and risk factors associated with rectovaginal GBS colonization among pregnant women receiving antenatal care at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH) between August and November 2017. In this cross-sectional study, consenting pregnant women between 12 and 40 weeks of gestation were enrolled. Interview-administered questionnaires were used to assess risk factors associated with GBS colonization. An anorectal swab and a lower vaginal swab were collected and cultured on Granada agar for GBS isolation. Positive colonies were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility to penicillin G, ampicillin, vancomycin, and clindamycin using disk diffusion method. Serotyping was performed by latex agglutination. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with GBS colonization. Results: A total of 292 women were enrolled. Their median age was 30 years (Interquatile range {IQR} 26–35) with a median gestational age of 35 weeks (IQR 30–37). Overall GBS was identified in 60/292 (20.5%) of participants. Among the positive isolates, resistance was detected for penicillin G in 42/60 (72.4%) isolates, ampicillin in 32/60 (55.2%) isolates, clindamycin in 14/60 (30.4%) isolates, and vancomycin in 14 (24.1%) isolates. All ten GBS serotypes were isolated, and 37/53 (69.8%) of GBS positive participants were colonized by more than one serotype. None of the tested risk factors was associated with GBS colonization. Conclusion: The prevalence of GBS colonization was high among mothers attending antenatal clinic at KNH. In addition, a high proportion of GBS isolates were resistant to commonly prescribed intrapartum antibiotics. Hence, other measures like GBS vaccination is a potentially useful approaches to GBS prevention and control in this population. Screening of pregnant mothers for GBS colonization should be introduced and antimicrobial susceptibility test performed on GBS positive samples to guide antibiotic prophylaxis.

Prevalence and factors associated with group B streptococcal colonization in pregnant women

Abstract Objectives: to estimate the prevalence and the factors associated with the colonization by group B streptococcus (GBS) in pregnant women from the urban area attended at health units in a municipality in northeastern Brazil. Methods: it is a cross-sectional study conducted from January 2017 to March 2018. Vagino-rectal swabs were collected from 210 pregnant women between 32 and 40 weeks of gestation. The swabs were seeded on 5% sheep blood agar and on chromogenic agar. For confirmatory identification of GBS, the CAMP test and latex agglutination were used. Descriptive analysis and univariate and multivariate association analysis were performed using a multinomial logistic model. Results: the prevalence of GBS colonization among pregnant women was 18.1% (n = 38), and a statistically significant association (p&lt;0.05) was found for income and parity variables in the group of older women in the univariate analysis, and for skin color, age and parity in the final multivariate analysis. Conclusions: the prevalence of maternal colonization by GBS was similar to that described in other studies. Although some risk factors, such as skin color, age and parity, were associated with colonization, other studies are essential to establish more information on pregnant women more likely to be colonized by GBS.

Meta-analysis on prevalence of vaginal group B streptococcus colonization and preterm births in India

Objective Preterm birth is a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Vaginal colonization of Group B Streptococci (GBS) is associated with increased risk of preterm birth. However, the association of GBS colonization and preterm births in the Indian context remains an unrecognized problem. Data sources Data was collected using various online search tools from 36 (1981–2019) Indian studies comprising 9778 cases. Method of study selection Studies reporting the prevalence of GBS colonization in the Indian population were included. Tabulation, Integration, and Results The prevalence of GBS colonization in pregnant Indian women was estimated to be 7.8% (763/9778) with wide heterogeneity across studies. The prevalence of GBS was 7.4% when culture methods were used and 11.6% with use of immunological methods. The detection rate of GBS almost doubled when enrichment was used in the culture method (8.1 vs. 5%). The risk of preterm delivery was higher (OR 7.9) among women with GBS colonization as compared to those without GBS. Conclusions As compared to the western population, there is low prevalence of GBS colonization among Indian pregnant women; however, the risk of preterm births with GBS colonization is higher. There is a need to implement a universal GBS screening program prior to intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis in women experiencing preterm births.